1328:
name, he is free to deviate from those rules. Somebody explained that "Saša" should be spelled as "Sasha" in
English spelling. Well, what if mr Tuksar likes "Sasa" better? His tennis name as it is spelled on the ITF site and picked up there by English-language media, is fully under his own control. Anytime he can log on to IPIN and change his first name to "Sasha" if he wants. All English-language sources will then start using that name for him. We cannot reasonably make the case that the name is a "mistake" or "inaccurate" when it is the person's own choice. Then some basic respect should take precedence over spelling rules.
766:
1446:, i.e. it relates to titles/page names not first line of lede where BLP would prioritise accuracy. Personally I have no problem (as Kauffner) with the actual page being at a non-diacritic location, the issue for me (again as per Kauffner's edit and explanation above) is that the first line in the lede of a Spanish/Czech/Croat etc. Latin-alphabet BLP should give the most accurate form of the name of the BLP subject according to his/her current citizenship. ... moreover I'm fully in favour of
250:
229:
678:– Revert undiscussed move back to original title with correctly spelled name of living person. The reason the International Tennis Association removes the diacritics from all tennis players names may be because Wimbledon and French Open scoreboards only have 26 letters? I don't know. But whatever the reason, that doesn't automatically mean WP should be doing so. This name is an illustration of why not: the male name Saša (pronounced
545:
524:
369:
715:, if the English usage is without the accents, as seems to be claimed by the nominator, then it should not have accents. And since the French Open is in France, where many accents exist in the French language, and they don't use this accented form either, it doesn't seem to support using the proposed accented form, since even a place with a language that uses accents doesn't use accents for this person.
119:
95:
555:
64:
181:
914:. If he was worried about that name then he could have asked the ITF to change it to "Sasha Tuksar" anytime. WP policy doesn't ask us to put every article at the "real name", we are required to put it under the most common name that is connected with their notable activity. His "real name" in native spelling is given at the very start of the article, so there is no problem at all.
1661:
260:
193:
762:
129:
1396:. "Sasa Tuksar" is not favored by WP:UE, because it is not an anglicized spelling. It is also not a different name from the proper name, so it is not supported by WP:COMMONNAME. We should do what we and other English-language reference works normally do with foreign names; get the article right, as required by WP:BLP.
1174:"The use of modified letters (such as accents or other diacritics) in article titles is neither encouraged nor discouraged; when deciding between versions of a word which differ in the use or non-use of modified letters, follow the general usage in reliable sources that are written in the English language"
1892:
All the dicaritic RfCs held through the years have mostly fallen 50/50ish. Suddenly this one is skewed... why?... the RfC titling was on-sided and it was about a personal essay. The other editors who push to follow wiki policy and guidelines, as with
Djokovic, didn't care about this essay RfC. Not a
970:
best known as
Aleksandar Tuksar, that would have been a cause to invoke the common name policy. Here, you just want to strip diacritics for no real reason and the invocation of preponderance of English-language sources serves as a nice crutch to achieve a goal that those sources do not strive for. --
969:
No, it's a common rendering of his common name, one using
English alphabet only. If he called himself e.g. Jack Green at ITF, that would have been a cause to invoke the stage name policy. If he called himself e.g. Sasha Tuxar, that would have been a cause to invoke the use English policy. If he was
954:
Why does that matter? It's been like that since the 1920s plus all the other
English sources use Sasa Tuksar too. It's his common name in the English alphabet. Remember, wiki doesn't care a bit about what you think is right or what I think is right... wiki cares about what we can source. And that is
794:
anyway. The title should provide useful information to the reader by telling him how the subject is usually referred to in published
English. The version of the name with diacritics can be given on top of the box, as well as boldface in the opening, so no information regarding pronunciation is lost.
1977:
So, reliable Czech/Croat sources are not usable to determine what is the common name for
English WP. The reliable Czech language sources are useful to find the common name for Czech WP. The reliable Croat language sources are useful to find the common name for Croat WP. It has nothing to do with
1327:
Yes, but does that mean a person can be required to stick to those "book" rules when he spells his own name in
English? I don't think so. For ordinary words it makes sense to require that they are properly translated according to the rules that exist for the given language. As for a person's own
984:
You can use different semantics if you like. For whatever reason: the
English speaking world, the English press, All authoritative agencies of Tennis... these sources call him and spell his name as Sasa Tuksar. He is notable only for playing tennis or there wouldn't even be an article on him. He
793:
says to, "follow the general usage in reliable sources that are written in the
English language." Ideally, we should follow reference works rather than news accounts. This subject was not mentioned in any reference work that I checked, and sports reference works generally drop off the diacritics
1502:
which I think we've all agreed it isn't by now. Also as a secondary issue, thinking about my own rationale of accuracy of pronunciation (which is the only reason for a diacritic in the first place), I wonder do ESPN and other broadcasters make an effort to pronounce names correctly? For example
1922:
Hello Fyunck, with respect, how many times has it been stated that players with cyrillic names are not pertinent examples to Latin names. I myself have said it getting on for eight times I would think, and I've seen others say it as well, so why are you continuing to cite a cyrillic name as an
1782:
Yeah right. This was about the essay only, nothing more. It was mentioned on a couple talk pages near the bottom where votes were being cast and no one gave it any serious thought. I know I didn't. It's title was ridiculous and it's placement was laughable for anything other than that essay.
820:
in the first line. This is an improvement, but I can't actually see from the above why WP would want undiacritic as the page location for BLP, but diacritic in the first words in lede of BLP. Can you for my benefit state again why/where that is documented in MOS or BLP. Cheers.
1747:
The RfC was presented in bad faith. The proposer immediately voted against his own proposal. A rejected proposal is not a proper basis to take a positive action. We've had a whole series of RfCs on this issue, and this one is hardly the best reflection of editor opinion.
1724:
One thing to note for the closing administrator. That discussion is strictly for a particular essay and whether that essay should use "no-diacritics" regardless of sources. It was a very poor choice of wording for a rfc on that essay. Other huge debates at
1623:, irrespective of the Times and Telegraph inability to print "ł" or "ę" (both papers do now often use German and French accents, inconsistent on Spanish, rarely for Eastern Europeans). And the Times and Telegraph are a lot more WP:RS than ESPN or ITF.
1547:
if you want. According to the Talk page that article has also had some moves, but it is now kept at her stagename , which only differs in one diacritic from her "real name". We cannot argue that it is an "error". And this is an article with FA status.
1613:
Is that the British quality press - Guardian, Times, Telegraph and so on - for years as reliable sources had "Lech Walesa" (which was naturally misread by many people when Solidarity first appeared as "Letsch Wales-ah," except that the BBC pronounced
1245:
occasionally get into the act and spell it Sasa Tuksar. Knowledge (XXG) tells us it wants English sources and plenty of English sources we have here...plus some foreign ones. I don't know what more an administrative closer could want.
1542:
I think adding the pronunciation is always recommended in articles when there can be doubts about the pronunciation. As for the name minus an accent not being a STAGENAME, I wouldn't be too sure about that. Have a look at
1618:
correctly as "Lekh Va-wen-sa" , yet WP following the underlined guideline above maintains the full Polish spelling in (1) the lede and (2) title. This is a very potent and clear demonstration of WP practice with BLPs:
1191:, because it is a policy. Well, if we apply that to this tennis player then we find that common English-language usage in virtually all our sources is "Sasa Tuksar". So the concensus based on policy is very clear.
1665:
1349:
isn't spelling his own name that way. The Federation is. We have no way of knowing its his own choice, and failing any proof its his own choice it is a mistake and we need to go with proper spelling. -
1367:
I fail to see how the quoted guideline is relevant. Diacritics are a style issue. The current title is supported by dozens of sources. No RS has been cited to support the claim that it is inaccurate.
839:, which states: "While the article title should generally be the name by which the subject is most commonly known, the subject's full name should be given in the lead paragraph, if known." IMO, the "
2019:
211:
451:
2014:
1768:
The RFC is not about the essay, as the opening question and comments clearly show. The discussion was mentioned on several relevant talk pages; its actual location is largely meaningless.
1978:
Cyrillic names, we are looking for the common name in English sources because that's the name most English readers will look for when they try to find the article about a certain player.
1421:. It is angliciced but maybe not according to whatever "rules" exist for anglicization from the given language. That doesn't make it any less anglicized. Otherwise you could argue that
694:
have meaning, they tell readers how the names are pronounced, and this living Croatian gentleman's name is pronounced "Sasha" no matter that the Wimbledon scoreboards can cope with.
1519:
are never exact, but English speakers do say "Re-nay La-cost" not "Reen La-coast", "Byorn Borg" not "Ba-joorn Borg." To be quite honest in terms of BLP accuracy adding "(pronounced
936:
have any relevance to the fact that due to ITF regulations and technical issues with scoreboards ITF players are not allowed to register with their own names? You should be citing
43:
447:
1583:, however, is not an anglicization despite it being the common spelling in English, which is why it receives very little support in dictionaries and encyclopedias. Similarly,
1271:"Ambiguous or inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined by reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources."
955:
overwhelmingly Sasa Tuksar. We don't put things here at wikipedia at official names or unofficial names or nicknames or casual names. We put them at their most common name.
206:
105:
847:)" format is a most awkward way to begin an article, certainly not the way anyone off Wiki does it. None of the examples given in the guideline support doing it this way.
470:
1953:
The policy on using common names and on foreign names does not prohibit the use of modified letters, if they are used in the common name as verified by reliable sources.
1666:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Tennis/Tennis names#RfC: Can a wikiproject require no-diacritics names, based on an organisation's rule or commonness in English press?
1729:
have gone the other way. Otherwise thanks for taking the time to sift through all the stuff here. I 100% disagree with your choice, but I know it's a thankless job.
1129:
18:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC) PS: Moving this to "Sasa Tuksar" is particularly absurd, since "Sasa" and the real name are not pronounced the same. The current name is
1480:
as far as I know. But this discussion is about moving the page, so considerations about the lede are a moot point here. It can be addressed after the RM is closed.
48:
2024:
1528:)" to the lede line is more important than the hacek over the 's' in this case. Many people would see the hacek over the 's' and not know it was "sh" anyway.
2004:
1213:- we have the ITF (the governing body of tennis), ATP and Davis Cup all using Sasa Tuksar. We have many English sources that wikipedia tells us to use like:
655:. While the discussion is somewhat split, I'm moved by the overwhelmingly one sided decision on the RFC noted in the section immediately below this poll. -
31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
937:
738:
611:
1472:
You are quite right that the question of moving an article is a different issue from the question what should be in the lede. The latter is handled per
318:
147:
23:
1037:
reverted Fyunck's edit "Saša Tuksar, professionally known as Sasa Tuksar, (born 12 May 1983)" back to normal WP:MOS per Kauffner. Asked for advice on
1450:
for titles when it refers to non-BLPs. I've made many RMs to move Latin/Greek/Hebrew terms to English equivalents, as you can see from attempts like
1230:
775:
489:
2054:
601:
1495:
836:
2039:
2029:
308:
483:
388:
151:
2059:
2009:
1839:
Doesn't matter... it was a query about an essay and a badly written question at that. It's useless except for the essay it was referring to.
1425:(one of the examples given there) is also not anglicized spelling, because "Nürnberg" should be written "Nuernberg" or something like that.
577:
331:
2049:
2044:
428:
421:
284:
146:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
2034:
716:
466:
432:
1948:
contains the following which appears to support use of diacritics on the common name where there is a reliable Czech/Croat/etc. source:
155:
1870:
If a ban is rejected, that is not the same as a mandate to do anything. This is hardly the only diacritic-related RfC Wiki has held.
142:
100:
1713:
1690:
1273:
Just because the ITF incorrectly changes the names by just stripping the diacritics instead of translating doesn't mean we should. -
1155:
1124:
1587:
has not been established as an anglicized spelling, and the name should therefore be presented in the correct orthographic form.
1498:
relates more to the edit (corrected by Kauffner, in my view correctly) which makes it appear that the name minus the accent is a
1041:
discussion page. Also note question on Tennis Project page re claim that Britannica doesn't use diacritics for some Tennis BLP.
568:
529:
1575:
is an anglicized spelling as it has entered the English language, as documented by authoritative sources such as dictionaries.
440:
273:
234:
75:
395:
1454:(although that particular RM failed spectacularly because I bungled presentation of the Google hits) so I'm not against
1648:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
646:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
1066:
problem. The essentially one-editor essay/proposal on forcing all tennis player names to never use diacritics raises
1443:
32:
1458:
in titles, far from it. It's just that BLPs have the extra onus of accuracy in the lede, not necessarily title.
734:
712:
81:
1607:"Ambiguous or inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined by reliable sources, are often avoided
1962:
1898:
1844:
1788:
1734:
1628:
1533:
1463:
1251:
1214:
1046:
1017:
990:
960:
945:
866:
826:
745:
720:
699:
1945:
1875:
1602:
1266:
1169:
1099:
63:
1012:- this is the same typical tennis-specific trivial diacritic censorship we've seen plenty of times now at
1857:
matter. All the voters are sided with the use of diacritics and it's clear for anyone who reads the RfC.
1499:
1038:
933:
911:
790:
1983:
1703:
1680:
1553:
1485:
1430:
1333:
1196:
1145:
1114:
919:
576:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
283:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1822:
1814:
891:
781:
1222:
1939:
42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
1818:
1579:
is also an anglicized spelling as she adopted the diacriticless form after becoming a U.S. citizen.
1106:. It says very clearly that diacritics are "neither encouraged nor discouraged" by naming policy. —
1063:
381:
1726:
1473:
1095:
1958:
1894:
1883:
1840:
1784:
1753:
1730:
1624:
1529:
1459:
1451:
1372:
1296:
1247:
1042:
986:
956:
941:
862:
852:
822:
799:
741:
695:
659:
46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
1825:, among others. So far, everyone seems to have commented on the issue itself and not the essay.
1079:
1013:
770:
39:
1238:
1234:
1615:
1354:
1314:
1278:
495:
1477:
1075:
1059:
459:
1979:
1830:
1773:
1698:
1675:
1592:
1549:
1524:
1515:
1505:
1481:
1426:
1401:
1329:
1192:
1140:
1109:
915:
134:
1810:
1087:
1083:
1973:"...follow the general usage in reliable sources that are written in the English language"
1226:
1935:
1871:
1669:
1639:
1455:
1447:
1439:
1418:
1180:
1091:
1071:
637:
1185:"The choice between anglicized and local spellings should follow English-language usage"
910:
This person didn't play tennis under his "real name", he played tennis as "Sasa Tuksar"
249:
228:
1218:
675:
560:
368:
1923:
example? Could you try and keep any future discussion to Latin-alphabet names please?
1601:
Just to confirm that what Prolog says is in line with what Djsasso previously said re
1067:
1998:
1879:
1749:
1368:
1292:
1025:
975:
848:
795:
786:
656:
413:
401:
265:
198:
1510:
1350:
1310:
1274:
887:
409:
405:
1826:
1769:
1588:
1544:
1397:
671:
544:
523:
180:
118:
94:
1858:
1309:
Any book that tells you how to translate diacritic words into english words. -
895:
683:
550:
255:
188:
124:
1172:
is a guideline and if you want to cite then why not cite all relevant parts:
1422:
691:
277:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to
1242:
1020:
etc. There is no benefit to removing the diacritic in the person's name. --
940:, but it appears that the ITF regulation is distorting usage in this case.
1987:
1966:
1902:
1887:
1865:
1848:
1834:
1792:
1777:
1757:
1738:
1718:
1632:
1596:
1557:
1537:
1489:
1467:
1434:
1405:
1376:
1358:
1337:
1318:
1300:
1282:
1255:
1200:
1160:
1050:
1029:
994:
979:
964:
949:
923:
902:
870:
856:
830:
803:
749:
724:
703:
662:
1094:
and other problems, and certainly does not represent a consensus even at
1058:
Typographic jingoism has been rejected again and again and again. It's a
1021:
971:
886:
per encyclopedic consciousness over "ITF regulations". Also the same for
494:
Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every
259:
1291:
Has a reliable source stated that "Sasa Tuksar" is an inaccurate name?
573:
1930:
I generally thing you're right with non-BLPs, but the two guidelines:
279:
154:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1609:
even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources.
1134:
57:
38:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
15:
179:
1496:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual_of_Style/Biographies#First_mention
938:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual_of_Style_(proper_names)#Diacritics
739:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual_of_Style_(proper_names)#Diacritics
636:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
1494:
Fine. My reason for emphasizing Kauffner's point about
932:
MakeSense64 you've claimed stage name before, but does
357:
352:
347:
342:
1638:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
769:
of these use the diacritic, all of them non-English.
2020:
Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
572:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1971:In the first sentence of that policy you can read:
1203:(Note: I have no idea why this appears underlined)
1098:much less Knowledge (XXG)-wide. PS: People citing
416:– to be used as examples for ideal page structures
2015:Stub-Class biography (sports and games) articles
1951:
8:
1513:, Anglicizations of foreign pronunciations
1133:. Any well-read English speaker recognizes "
837:WP:Manual_of_Style/Biographies#First_mention
1938:cites on only one Latin-alphabet bio name,
1668:. This is directly relevant to the ongoing
1664:You are invited to join the discussion at
690:) when the "š" is changed to a "s". These
518:
376:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
326:
223:
89:
61:
812:Hi Kauffner - I see you've edited from "
1655:Proposal to require no-diacritics names
520:
225:
91:
765:Google News results for this subject.
1523:
1514:
1504:
164:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography
7:
2025:Sports and games work group articles
651:The result of the move request was:
566:This article is within the scope of
488:Tag more articles with our standard
271:This article is within the scope of
140:This article is within the scope of
2005:Biography articles of living people
586:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Croatia
80:It is of interest to the following
1239:Croation Open 2005 English version
293:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Tennis
14:
1417:That's a wrong interpretation of
1659:
1621:accuracy in WP:BLPs is paramount
553:
543:
522:
367:
258:
248:
227:
191:
127:
117:
93:
62:
21:This article must adhere to the
2055:Low-importance Croatia articles
1509:not Anglicized as "Sassa", for
606:This article has been rated as
313:This article has been rated as
207:the sports and games work group
2040:Low-importance tennis articles
2030:WikiProject Biography articles
1809:The discussion is linked from
1444:Knowledge (XXG):Article titles
737:cover diacritics in BLPs? See
431:and expand it, or peruse the
167:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
2060:All WikiProject Croatia pages
2010:Stub-Class biography articles
1695:18:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC) —
580:and see a list of open tasks.
287:and see a list of open tasks.
204:This article is supported by
24:biographies of living persons
1137:" and knows it means /sh/.—
816:(Croatian: Saša Tuksar)" to
589:Template:WikiProject Croatia
152:contribute to the discussion
2050:Stub-Class Croatia articles
2045:WikiProject Tennis articles
296:Template:WikiProject Tennis
36:must be removed immediately
2076:
2035:Stub-Class tennis articles
1988:13:11, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
1967:12:47, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
1903:18:37, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
1888:17:48, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
1866:16:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
1849:05:37, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
1835:19:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
1793:19:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
1778:17:55, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
1758:11:52, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
1739:19:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
1719:18:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
1633:02:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
1597:20:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
1558:11:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
1538:10:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
1490:09:39, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
1468:09:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
1435:05:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
1406:20:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1377:02:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
1359:17:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1338:16:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1319:16:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1301:16:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1283:15:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1256:08:54, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1201:05:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1161:18:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
1051:13:35, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
1030:19:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
995:09:38, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
980:09:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
965:03:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
950:03:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
924:07:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
903:07:22, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
871:13:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
857:04:33, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
831:03:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
804:04:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
750:03:14, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
725:04:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
704:18:24, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
663:15:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
612:project's importance scale
319:project's importance scale
1243:TennisLive Czech Republic
1231:the Sydney Morning herald
605:
538:
325:
312:
243:
187:
112:
88:
1853:As the outcome shows it
1645:Please do not modify it.
985:belongs at Sasa Tuksar.
789:all drop the diacritic.
643:Please do not modify it.
498:ATP and WTA tournament.
1955:
1503:Anglicized as "Sasha"
1233:. And even the French
1183:policy, which states:
184:
70:This article is rated
776:Sydney Morning Herald
387:Take an item off the
183:
143:WikiProject Biography
74:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1878:are still in force.
1227:Sunshine Cup juniors
1223:China people's daily
1179:We find the same in
1727:talk:Novak Djokovic
1577:Martina Navratilova
1215:Honolulu Advertiser
1131:directly misleading
569:WikiProject Croatia
1452:Passover sacrifice
835:I base my edit on
274:WikiProject Tennis
185:
170:biography articles
76:content assessment
1940:Søren Kierkegaard
1893:big enough deal.
1716:
1693:
1158:
1127:
1102:need to actually
1018:Talk:Saša Hiršzon
626:
625:
622:
621:
618:
617:
517:
516:
513:
512:
509:
508:
505:
504:
222:
221:
218:
217:
56:
55:
2067:
1862:
1717:
1712:
1711:
1709:
1694:
1689:
1688:
1686:
1663:
1662:
1647:
1527:
1518:
1508:
1159:
1154:
1153:
1151:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1120:
899:
682:) becomes sasa (
645:
594:
593:
592:Croatia articles
590:
587:
584:
563:
558:
557:
556:
547:
540:
539:
534:
526:
519:
490:project template
433:List of articles
371:
364:
363:
327:
301:
300:
297:
294:
291:
268:
263:
262:
252:
245:
244:
239:
231:
224:
201:
196:
195:
194:
172:
171:
168:
165:
162:
148:join the project
137:
135:Biography portal
132:
131:
130:
121:
114:
113:
108:
106:Sports and Games
97:
90:
73:
67:
66:
58:
44:this noticeboard
16:
2075:
2074:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2066:
2065:
2064:
1995:
1994:
1860:
1707:
1702:
1696:
1684:
1679:
1673:
1660:
1657:
1652:
1643:
1149:
1144:
1138:
1118:
1113:
1107:
1014:Talk:Mate Pavić
897:
641:
631:
591:
588:
585:
582:
581:
559:
554:
552:
532:
501:
486:of the project.
389:Cleanup listing
362:
299:tennis articles
298:
295:
292:
289:
288:
264:
257:
237:
197:
192:
190:
169:
166:
163:
160:
159:
133:
128:
126:
103:
71:
12:
11:
5:
2073:
2071:
2063:
2062:
2057:
2052:
2047:
2042:
2037:
2032:
2027:
2022:
2017:
2012:
2007:
1997:
1996:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1975:
1950:
1949:
1943:
1932:
1931:
1928:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1742:
1741:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1650:
1640:requested move
1635:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1409:
1408:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1362:
1361:
1341:
1340:
1322:
1321:
1304:
1303:
1286:
1285:
1259:
1258:
1237:and Croations
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1177:
1164:
1163:
1132:
1105:
1053:
1032:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
927:
926:
905:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
807:
806:
755:
754:
753:
752:
735:WP:Use English
728:
727:
713:WP:Use English
669:
667:
649:
648:
638:requested move
632:
630:
629:Requested move
627:
624:
623:
620:
619:
616:
615:
608:Low-importance
604:
598:
597:
595:
578:the discussion
565:
564:
561:Croatia portal
548:
536:
535:
533:Low‑importance
527:
515:
514:
511:
510:
507:
506:
503:
502:
500:
499:
493:
487:
482:*Sign up as a
474:
455:
446:Add photos to
436:
417:
391:
375:
373:
372:
361:
360:
355:
350:
345:
339:
336:
335:
323:
322:
315:Low-importance
311:
305:
304:
302:
285:the discussion
270:
269:
253:
241:
240:
238:Low‑importance
232:
220:
219:
216:
215:
212:Low-importance
203:
202:
186:
176:
175:
173:
139:
138:
122:
110:
109:
98:
86:
85:
79:
68:
54:
53:
49:this help page
33:poorly sourced
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2072:
2061:
2058:
2056:
2053:
2051:
2048:
2046:
2043:
2041:
2038:
2036:
2033:
2031:
2028:
2026:
2023:
2021:
2018:
2016:
2013:
2011:
2008:
2006:
2003:
2002:
2000:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1976:
1974:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1959:In ictu oculi
1957:
1956:
1954:
1947:
1946:WP:DIACRITICS
1944:
1941:
1937:
1934:
1933:
1929:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1895:Fyunck(click)
1891:
1890:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1876:WP:DIACRITICS
1873:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1864:
1863:
1856:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1841:Fyunck(click)
1838:
1837:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1785:Fyunck(click)
1781:
1780:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1731:Fyunck(click)
1728:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1715:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1692:
1682:
1678:
1677:
1671:
1667:
1654:
1649:
1646:
1641:
1636:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1625:In ictu oculi
1622:
1617:
1612:
1610:
1605:which states
1604:
1603:WP:COMMONNAME
1600:
1599:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1546:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1530:In ictu oculi
1526:
1522:
1517:
1512:
1507:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1460:In ictu oculi
1457:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1392:
1391:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1267:WP:COMMONNAME
1264:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1248:Fyunck(click)
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1209:
1208:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1187:. Notice the
1186:
1182:
1178:
1175:
1171:
1170:WP:USEENGLISH
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1162:
1157:
1147:
1143:
1142:
1136:
1130:
1126:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1103:
1101:
1100:WP:USEENGLISH
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1043:In ictu oculi
1040:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1008:
1007:
996:
992:
988:
987:Fyunck(click)
983:
982:
981:
977:
973:
968:
967:
966:
962:
958:
957:Fyunck(click)
953:
952:
951:
947:
943:
942:In ictu oculi
939:
935:
931:
930:
929:
928:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
906:
904:
901:
900:
893:
889:
885:
882:
881:
872:
868:
864:
863:In ictu oculi
860:
859:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:
832:
828:
824:
823:In ictu oculi
819:
815:
811:
810:
809:
808:
805:
801:
797:
792:
788:
784:
783:
778:
777:
772:
768:
764:
760:
757:
756:
751:
747:
743:
742:In ictu oculi
740:
736:
732:
731:
730:
729:
726:
722:
718:
717:70.24.251.224
714:
711:
708:
707:
706:
705:
701:
697:
696:In ictu oculi
693:
689:
686:, pronounced
685:
681:
677:
673:
668:
665:
664:
661:
658:
654:
647:
644:
639:
634:
633:
628:
613:
609:
603:
600:
599:
596:
579:
575:
571:
570:
562:
551:
549:
546:
542:
541:
537:
531:
528:
525:
521:
497:
491:
485:
481:
479:
475:
472:
468:
464:
462:
461:
456:
453:
452:Tennis people
449:
445:
443:
442:
437:
434:
430:
429:Start article
426:
424:
423:
418:
415:
414:Justine Henin
411:
407:
403:
402:Roger Federer
400:
398:
397:
392:
390:
386:
384:
383:
378:
377:
374:
370:
366:
365:
359:
356:
354:
351:
349:
346:
344:
341:
340:
338:
337:
333:
329:
328:
324:
320:
316:
310:
307:
306:
303:
286:
282:
281:
276:
275:
267:
266:Tennis portal
261:
256:
254:
251:
247:
246:
242:
236:
233:
230:
226:
213:
210:(assessed as
209:
208:
200:
199:Sports portal
189:
182:
178:
177:
174:
157:
156:documentation
153:
149:
145:
144:
136:
125:
123:
120:
116:
115:
111:
107:
102:
99:
96:
92:
87:
83:
77:
69:
65:
60:
59:
51:
50:
45:
41:
37:
34:
30:
26:
25:
20:
18:
17:
1972:
1952:
1927:Hi Kauffner,
1921:
1859:
1854:
1697:
1674:
1658:
1644:
1637:
1620:
1608:
1606:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1520:
1511:Sasha (name)
1500:WP:STAGENAME
1414:
1393:
1346:
1270:
1262:
1210:
1188:
1184:
1173:
1139:
1108:
1055:
1039:WP:STAGENAME
1034:
1009:
934:WP:STAGENAME
912:WP:STAGENAME
907:
896:
892:Nikola Čačić
888:Nikola Cacic
883:
844:
840:
817:
813:
791:WP:DIACRITIC
780:
774:
758:
709:
687:
679:
670:
666:
652:
650:
642:
635:
607:
567:
477:
476:
458:
457:
439:
438:
420:
419:
410:Rafael Nadal
406:Leander Paes
394:
393:
380:
379:
314:
278:
272:
205:
141:
82:WikiProjects
47:
35:
28:
22:
1980:MakeSense64
1699:SMcCandlish
1676:SMcCandlish
1672:, above. —
1616:Lech Wałęsa
1585:Sasa Tuksar
1581:Lech Walesa
1550:MakeSense64
1545:Celine Dion
1482:MakeSense64
1442:is part of
1427:MakeSense64
1330:MakeSense64
1269:which says
1241:and Czechs
1193:MakeSense64
1141:SMcCandlish
1110:SMcCandlish
916:MakeSense64
845:native name
841:common name
818:Saša Tuksar
814:Sasa Tuksar
676:Saša Tuksar
672:Sasa Tuksar
1999:Categories
1064:WP:SOAPBOX
785:, and the
692:diacritics
684:windflower
653:page moved
469:up to our
72:Stub-class
1573:Nuremberg
1474:WP:MOSBIO
1423:Nuremberg
1219:On Tennis
1096:WP:TENNIS
782:USA Today
471:standards
161:Biography
101:Biography
40:libellous
1880:Kauffner
1750:Kauffner
1714:Contrib.
1691:Contrib.
1525:/ˈsa:ʃə/
1369:Kauffner
1293:Kauffner
1156:Contrib.
1125:Contrib.
1080:WP:UNDUE
861:Thanks.
849:Kauffner
796:Kauffner
761:. I get
657:UtherSRG
496:Open Era
465:Bring a
454:articles
396:Copyedit
1516:/ˈsæʃə/
1506:/ˈsæʃə/
1478:WP:LEAD
1415:Comment
1394:Support
1351:DJSasso
1311:DJSasso
1275:DJSasso
1263:Support
1235:LeMonde
1104:read it
1076:WP:NPOV
1060:WP:BIAS
1056:Support
1035:Comment
1010:Support
908:Comment
884:Support
688:"sassa"
680:"Sasha"
610:on the
583:Croatia
574:Croatia
530:Croatia
427:Grab a
382:Cleanup
348:history
330:Tennis
317:on the
1827:Prolog
1823:WT:NCP
1815:WT:MOS
1811:WP:VPP
1770:Prolog
1589:Prolog
1398:Prolog
1211:Oppose
1189:should
1088:WP:NOT
1084:WP:NOR
759:Oppose
710:Oppose
660:(talk)
484:member
448:Tennis
422:Expand
290:Tennis
280:tennis
235:Tennis
78:scale.
1936:WP:UE
1872:WP:UE
1861:Lajbi
1819:WT:AT
1704:Talk⇒
1681:Talk⇒
1670:WP:RM
1521:Sasha
1456:WP:UE
1448:WP:UE
1440:WP:UE
1419:WP:UE
1181:WP:UE
1146:Talk⇒
1115:Talk⇒
1092:WP:AT
1072:WP:RS
898:Lajbi
733:Does
478:Other
460:Stubs
441:Photo
358:purge
353:watch
332:To-do
1984:talk
1963:talk
1899:talk
1884:talk
1874:and
1855:does
1845:talk
1831:talk
1821:and
1789:talk
1774:talk
1754:talk
1735:talk
1629:talk
1593:talk
1554:talk
1534:talk
1486:talk
1476:and
1464:talk
1431:talk
1402:talk
1373:talk
1355:talk
1334:talk
1315:talk
1297:talk
1279:talk
1265:per
1252:talk
1229:and
1197:talk
1068:WP:V
1062:and
1047:talk
1026:talk
1022:Joy
991:talk
976:talk
972:Joy
961:talk
946:talk
920:talk
867:talk
853:talk
827:talk
800:talk
771:ESPN
767:Four
746:talk
721:talk
700:talk
467:Stub
343:edit
150:and
1706:ɖ∘¿
1683:ɖ∘¿
1642:.
1148:ɖ∘¿
1117:ɖ∘¿
890:to
787:BBC
602:Low
450:or
309:Low
29:BLP
2001::
1986:)
1965:)
1901:)
1886:)
1847:)
1833:)
1817:,
1813:,
1791:)
1776:)
1756:)
1737:)
1631:)
1595:)
1556:)
1536:)
1488:)
1466:)
1433:)
1404:)
1375:)
1357:)
1347:He
1336:)
1317:)
1299:)
1281:)
1254:)
1225:,
1221:,
1217:,
1199:)
1090:,
1086:,
1082:,
1074:,
1049:)
1028:)
1016:,
993:)
978:)
963:)
948:)
922:)
894:.
869:)
855:)
829:)
802:)
779:,
773:,
763:96
748:)
723:)
702:)
674:→
640:.
412:,
408:,
404:,
214:).
104::
1982:(
1961:(
1942:.
1897:(
1882:(
1843:(
1829:(
1787:(
1772:(
1752:(
1733:(
1710:þ
1708:¤
1687:þ
1685:¤
1627:(
1611:"
1591:(
1552:(
1532:(
1484:(
1462:(
1429:(
1400:(
1371:(
1353:(
1332:(
1313:(
1295:(
1277:(
1250:(
1195:(
1176:.
1152:þ
1150:¤
1135:š
1121:þ
1119:¤
1078:/
1070:/
1045:(
1024:(
989:(
974:(
959:(
944:(
918:(
865:(
851:(
843:(
825:(
798:(
744:(
719:(
698:(
614:.
492:.
480::
473:.
463::
444::
435:.
425::
399::
385::
334::
321:.
158:.
84::
52:.
27:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
