519:
material without sourcing. I read the book "not a genuine black man", and while the book may have information on the details of the covenants (i dont recall the details given in it), it most assuredly did not take a positive approach to the covenants, which was the impression given by having long paragraphs with only 1 reference at the end, which may only have been a source for some statistics. any sourcing from that book would have to give page numbers, with inline citations for each statement. i left in the bare bones decade by decade population breakdown, with last statement needing a citation, but presumably correct. I have placed a tag cautioning editors about this controversial subject on the talk page. If material is added back without sourcing, i will remove it again, and if added back with sources, but without due weight being considered, I will add a tag to the article itself, but its not an issue now that i have removed it.
261:- if that's the right word, I'm trying to say it's written from a european/european-Amerrican viewpoint rather than an Indigineous Peoples/ Native American viewpoint. For example, The "History" section starts out "San Leandro was first discovered on March 20, 1772 by Spanish soldier..." but for anyone who has studied California, it's obvious that the whole bay area was "heavily populated", in terms of populations of Indiginous Peoples of the time, and going back several hundred if not thousands of years. I guess it's a question of Knowledge (XXG) style, and perhaps I should be looking at
174:
80:
53:
90:
22:
214:
162:
518:
in favor of such covenants, any sources which show such support for covenants would have to be balanced by sources which showed opposition to such covenants, so as to give due weight to both sides, both as they existed at the time, and how the debate is viewed today. Please do not simply add back the
513:
The material in this article on restrictive covenants (also known as racial covenants) and the history of san leandro was almost entirely unsourced, and was highly biased in its coverage. Anyone who wants to add back any of the statements i have removed needs to have sources from reliable, notable,
362:
Whoever has been maintaining this page is mis-representing the issues at SLHS. It is an inaccurate picture to only allow the "glowing" things to be presented. You should also include the statistics which shows the issues they face. Omitting these challenges is akin to allowing a drunk to ignore his
396:
I went ahead and tagged this with the copyvio tag since it's been raised twice now on the discussion page but the copyrighted content is still there intact. I checked and it is indeed copied verbatim from the city website. The city has copyrighted its page and reserved all rights so there is no
265:
instead of shooting my virtual mouth off here... but as an (originally) American phenomenon, how does
Knowledge (XXG) as an entity view the question of eurocentricity in articles such as this one? (Oh, so I did look, and it does not seem to be addressed... hmmm). I'm not
229:. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Knowledge (XXG)'s
187:
63:
374:. It should be rewritten and the information broadened to reflect something more than this mediocre writing. This page is also poorly referenced and a bit biased in some comments about racism etc.
348:
This section should be mostly eliminated by the creation of seperate entries for each of the high schools. I do not know much of anything about these schools, so am not the right person to do so.--
397:
rationale for the content's continued presence on this page. The article has other issues, including sourcing and NPOV, but removing the copyvio is a start. ferretstew 05:03, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
557:
192:
552:
562:
462:
text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of
152:
547:
142:
489:
for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators
451:
572:
324:
221:
567:
542:
288:
you are correct TZF. article could use more info on Native
American settlement and use. i shall try to find something, but it may take some time.
118:
497:
from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --
328:
230:
103:
58:
381:
413:
303:
The entirety of the first 5 paragraphs of the history section (save 1 sentence about natives) appears to be copied in toto from
246:
33:
514:
3rd party print or online publications, to justify the assertions. In addition, as the removed content was clearly taking a
179:
494:
262:
524:
226:
332:
39:
21:
459:
455:
401:
377:
385:
447:
308:
117:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
520:
507:
409:
498:
422:
438:
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from:
225:, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be
234:
95:
289:
515:
486:
405:
536:
439:
372:
304:
270:
presumptuous enough to edit the page on my own to try to remove or even mitigate the
371:
It looks like the history setoin was copied from the City of San
Leandro website at
528:
501:
425:
389:
352:
336:
311:
292:
282:
446:
it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
79:
52:
274:, but I find the topic interesting enough that I am jotting it down here... I'll
478:
be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original
349:
258:
482:
442:. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored,
169:
113:
108:
85:
363:
problem. It is only when the truth is known that the situation will improve.
279:
161:
208:
15:
160:
450:
if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
278:
this discussion page and see if anything comes of it.
233:. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise
307:
which specifically claims copyright to its content.
440:http://www.ci.san-leandro.ca.us/slcityhistory.html
305:http://www.ci.san-leandro.ca.us/slcityhistory.html
558:Mid-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
8:
317:San Leandro, California is in United States?
553:Start-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
243:Wondering how to edit this U.S. City Entry?
19:
563:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
47:
49:
257:Oh, the writing on this page is SOOOO
127:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject California
448:"using copyrighted works from others"
421:Thank you for taking care of that. --
358:Honesty about San Leandro High School
7:
573:Knowledge (XXG) controversial topics
101:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
548:Mid-importance California articles
14:
485:from that source. Please see our
188:San Francisco Bay Area task force
452:"donating copyrighted materials"
212:
172:
88:
78:
51:
20:
568:WikiProject California articles
543:Start-Class California articles
263:Knowledge (XXG):Manual_of_Style
147:This article has been rated as
130:Template:WikiProject California
1:
293:18:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
185:This article is supported by
180:San Francisco Bay Area portal
121:and see a list of open tasks.
474:. Accordingly, the material
337:03:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
312:03:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
299:Seems to be largely copyvio
589:
529:07:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
487:guideline on non-free text
390:06:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
353:14:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
153:project's importance scale
502:19:54, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
466:, but not as a source of
434:Copyright problem removed
426:19:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
283:18:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
168:
146:
73:
46:
247:WikiProject U.S. Cities
231:policies and guidelines
321:Has California moved?
249:standards might help.
165:
104:WikiProject California
64:San Francisco Bay Area
28:This article is rated
508:Restrictive covenants
327:comment was added by
164:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
222:controversial issues
220:This topic contains
458:, we cannot accept
133:California articles
166:
34:content assessment
454:if you are.) For
418:
404:comment added by
380:comment added by
367:Copyright Concern
340:
272:eurocentric angle
241:
240:
207:
206:
203:
202:
199:
198:
96:California portal
580:
417:
398:
392:
322:
216:
215:
209:
182:
177:
176:
175:
135:
134:
131:
128:
125:
98:
93:
92:
91:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
588:
587:
583:
582:
581:
579:
578:
577:
533:
532:
521:Mercurywoodrose
511:
436:
399:
375:
369:
360:
346:
344:Schools Section
323:—The preceding
319:
301:
255:
213:
178:
173:
171:
132:
129:
126:
123:
122:
94:
89:
87:
67:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
586:
584:
576:
575:
570:
565:
560:
555:
550:
545:
535:
534:
510:
505:
499:Moonriddengirl
435:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
423:Moonriddengirl
368:
365:
359:
356:
345:
342:
329:71.142.213.199
318:
315:
309:71.231.107.188
300:
297:
296:
295:
254:
251:
244:
239:
238:
217:
205:
204:
201:
200:
197:
196:
193:Mid-importance
184:
183:
167:
157:
156:
149:Mid-importance
145:
139:
138:
136:
119:the discussion
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
68:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
585:
574:
571:
569:
566:
564:
561:
559:
556:
554:
551:
549:
546:
544:
541:
540:
538:
531:
530:
526:
522:
517:
509:
506:
504:
503:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:legal reasons
453:
449:
445:
441:
433:
427:
424:
420:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
395:
394:
393:
391:
387:
383:
379:
373:
366:
364:
357:
355:
354:
351:
343:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
316:
314:
313:
310:
306:
298:
294:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
281:
277:
273:
269:
264:
260:
252:
250:
248:
236:
232:
228:
224:
223:
218:
211:
210:
194:
191:(assessed as
190:
189:
181:
170:
163:
159:
158:
154:
150:
144:
141:
140:
137:
120:
116:
115:
110:
106:
105:
97:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
512:
490:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
443:
437:
382:67.119.90.98
370:
361:
347:
320:
302:
275:
271:
267:
256:
253:Eurocentrism
242:
235:edit summary
219:
186:
148:
112:
102:
40:WikiProjects
464:information
460:copyrighted
400:—Preceding
376:—Preceding
290:Newarknanny
259:Eurocentric
30:Start-class
537:Categories
483:plagiarize
406:Ferretstew
124:California
114:California
109:U.S. state
59:California
468:sentences
414:contribs
402:unsigned
378:unsigned
325:unsigned
227:disputed
495:blocked
472:phrases
276:"watch"
151:on the
516:WP:POV
444:unless
350:Fizbin
36:scale.
268:quite
525:talk
491:will
410:talk
386:talk
333:talk
245:The
493:be
476:may
470:or
280:Tzf
143:Mid
111:of
539::
527:)
480:or
416:)
412:•
388:)
335:)
195:).
62::
523:(
408:(
384:(
339:.
331:(
237:.
155:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
