Knowledge

Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories

Source đź“ť

1219:
who are the leading Sandy Hook theorists, the operation is discussed at length. If we cut down on the number of nouns listed that is fine, but I think it's appropriate to demonstrate what full spectrum means (especially involvement of prosecutors, medical examiners, hospitals, media, etc.), since this wouldn't be clear to most readers. Exceedingly few theorists have claimed anytime recently (anytime after December 2012/January 2013) that children were actually killed by the government in a conventional false-flag shooting, certainly no high-profile theorists. Thus, the 'more common theory' warrants separation by a new paragraph. Slatersteven, what language are you unsure of?
1058: 1037: 496: 870: 703: 682: 1284:
anything untoward is another matter. I did remove the sections about the home sales pending this discussion (though I described it as the claim of Fetzer, who lost a lawsuit which may cast doubt on his credibility). I'm not making personal claims about the event, I'm stating what Fetzer Tracy and others' theories are, since that is relevant to the article. In every edit, it says Person X claimed, stated, asserted, argues, etc. Not that it is fact.
1068: 597: 332: 285: 929: 902: 250: 517: 713: 939: 220: 1005: 1175: 465: 368: 396: 814: 787: 1252:
people aren't aware of what that means, and it only takes up 1-1.5 lines to explain. EDIT: I'm assuming you're BLP concerns are referring to Fetzer claims about the parents. I'll remove those for now and restore what is in the lede, but they do accurately summate what is claimed in Fetzer's book, without stating they are factually true.
1803:
How is an explanation of the theories not relevant or informative in an article about the theories? How does it violate BLP if someone believed it was true (and it was noted that a jury found it to be false)? It's already stated in no uncertain terms here that the Sandy Hook CTs are false, but they
1768:
I'm fine with the break you put in. To tie up this discussion, I don't really think there are any BLP concerns around the home-sales thing, since it's clear that it's Fetzer's claim and comes from his book, and is not being presented as a generally accepted fact. It's also made clear in the article
1429:
It's silly to omit the 3-word name and say 'a canceled full-spectrum Iowa training exercise', when people have no idea what full-spectrum means. A detailed coverage of OCC as discussed in the sources would take several paragraphs, and this is one short clause that takes up 1.5 lines total. I'll see
1365:
I changed it to reflect both threats and outcry. I tightened it up and think it's fairly succinct (takes up one line). OCC needs to be mentioned since it is the real-world basis for theorists' training-exercise beliefs, which otherwise would just be products of imagination/out of left field. Almost
1299:
Its not suitable for the lede, the body maybe, but the lede if as a summary of the article, not for details that are not even in the article. And (As I said) the issue was how it was worded. We cannot use language that even implies this may be true. Please undo your addition to the lede and move it
1267:
Well for a start the claim it was "the shooting was modeled on Operation Closed Campus" has not been. As has the claim about house purchases, and people moving away from a place where their kids got shot...well that is odd. We need third party analysis of these claims, not just repeating them as if
1218:
Recent edits 'on the more common conspiracy theory' represent the leading theory, which is that the event was a (classified) training exercise modeled on 'full spectrum' or 'capstone' training exercises, most notably the canceled Operation Closed Campus. In the book co-authored by Fetzer and Tracy,
1251:
What is unsubstantiated? Fetzer and Tracy's book, which claims the shooting was modeled on Operation Closed Campus, was cited. The details of the operation (agencies/personnel involved, that it was canceled and why) are linked via three reliable sources. We could just say 'full-spectrum,' but most
1398:
It is absolutely relevant. The point is not whether it proves anything or convinces you or me or anyone else. The article is about Sandy Hook CTs. It is an exposition of the theories, an exposition of arguments against the theories, and societal context around the theories; it's supposed to be an
1621:
OK then if it's really a concern should we say 'primary' or main or whatever? Do you really want to have 50 citations after that statement (which would outweigh the small number of citations dealing with theories involving violence)? I think it's fine as is. There have been a handful of theories
1586:
The large majority of the sources cited deal with the theory that it never happened, which I'd estimate constitutes over 99% of the Sandy Hook CT content since early 2013. People believe the government has been involved in violent false flag operations, but rarely with respect to Sandy Hook. The
1283:
I didn't say it was modeled on it, I said Fetzer and Tracy, who are the most well known theorists, stated that it was modeled on it in the book that they published and I cited. Just read the source cited and you will see that I'm correct. I agree that it's odd, whether or not it's indicative of
1235:
I am unsure it is worded in a way that reflects the fact these are wholly unsubstantiated claims (and not uncovered facts). Nor do I think we need this level of details about one or two persons claims without third-party analysis of said claims (especially as this is a BLP about allegations of
1751:
I changed disseminated to adopted, to make the never-happened belief seem less tied to their actions/under their control. Much of Fetzer and Tracy's cited material goes into great detail on the exercise theory, including a 400-page book titled 'it was a FEMA drill' that was written by both of
1493:
It is an absolutely relevant, core fact about the CTs that takes up half a line. It is just as relevant as the fact that they believe it was a training exercise, since it directly inspired/caused the belief. I removed all the details about what the drill involved and put them in your new
1769:
that a jury disagreed with him about his overall beliefs. The home-sales parent-age/moving things are a significant part of Fetzer's theory (and are frequently cited by most other Sandy Hook theorists), so should be mentioned. If you have any concerns around that let me know.
1399:
objective look at the phenomenon, not a proving or debunking. Therefore, there can be some fundamental details given/introduced about the theories (again, it's one line) in the lede that are fleshed out more in the body, per typical style in encyclopedias and general writing.
378: 166: 1654:
To clarify, the 'more common' phrase refers to the general idea that it was faked/didn't happen, not necessarily to the training exercise theory (though in fact that is the most common theory), which is said to be specific to 'Fetzer Tracy and
57: 629:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the 1718:
OK, but it explicitly says who believes what, and what 'most common' is referring to. The training-exercise theory is a subcategory of never-happened and is not at odds with it. It's a long sentence but there is really no lack of
879: 797: 1460:
As I said, the entire basis of the main CT material is a COMPARISON of Sandy Hook and the OCC template, it's silly and inappropriate to exclude a few explanatory words from the lede (now half a line) on the grounds that it's
207: 203: 1685:
Yes it says that Fetzer Tracy and others most commonly believe it didn't happen, and that Fetzer and Tracy specifically believe it was a training exercise. Those two things aren't necessarily related, the way it
160: 1622:
involving violence which are mentioned beforehand in the first paragraph, but the large majority of the article deals with the never-happened theory, so it's appropriate to note its greater popularity.
860: 2083: 2128: 1191: 825:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 37: 422:
This is just disrespectful having all this here and is not fair on the families should they come across this on Knowledge. Anyo e in favor of this article being should be ashamed, period.
826: 1836:
may come into it, as this is what these are accusations of criminal activity. We cannot include this kind of accusation without explanation or commentary. We need RS to discuss this.
2073: 1098: 884: 2008: 2033: 1115: 821: 792: 664: 654: 211: 181: 338: 148: 2068: 2038: 1851:
It's extremely ridiculous to have an article about a subject (theories), but then you can't even explain what those theories are. I'll keep out the home-sales part.
618: 2123: 2063: 1979:
UNsure, I am not sure him or his views are all that relevant. But if we mention his views we should mention they have (successfully) challenged in a court of law.
1151: 1141: 850: 2103: 1019: 2048: 769: 759: 630: 2133: 2028: 2018: 1927: 1587:
overwhelming focus of counter-Sandy Hook CT organizations (e.g. HONR) mentioned is challenging the idea that it never happened (calling CTs 'hoaxers' etc).
1105: 1014: 912: 579: 569: 142: 92: 1366:
all of the CT material on the subject concentrates on attempting to draw parallels between OCC and like exercises and what they observed at Sandy Hook.
2108: 2093: 2053: 995: 985: 138: 2023: 2003: 1110: 2118: 2058: 625: 602: 188: 2113: 2098: 1954: 735: 1602:
What? What has this to do with the claim that the claim the training exercise is "the more common conspiracy theory" needs sourcing? And read
1478:
NOt unwieldy, not policy compliant, the lede is a summary, not a newspaper style leader. This is my last word on the subject, read the policy.
2043: 545: 98: 2013: 1081: 1042: 961: 154: 2088: 1203: 1093: 440: 2078: 726: 687: 524: 501: 266:
to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to
1988: 1973: 1942: 1875: 1860: 1845: 1813: 1797: 1778: 1761: 1745: 1728: 1712: 1695: 1679: 1664: 1648: 1631: 1615: 1596: 1577: 1503: 1487: 1470: 1454: 1439: 1423: 1408: 1392: 1375: 1359: 1340: 1325: 1309: 1293: 1277: 1261: 1245: 1228: 416: 256: 112: 43: 952: 907: 117: 33: 1089:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
346: 271: 87: 476: 446: 354: 267: 263: 1383:
In the body, the lede is a summary, only. And no we do not need to mention this, as it proves or demonstrates nothing.
426: 402: 310: 78: 234: 1331:
Give me a few minutes to make some changes. It seems to have been both threats and public outcry. Will mention both.
544:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
219: 198: 374: 314: 230: 1784:
I have nothing more to add to what I have said above, I do not agree its relevant or informative, and violated
122: 249: 1984: 1936: 1871: 1841: 1793: 1741: 1708: 1675: 1644: 1611: 1573: 1483: 1450: 1419: 1388: 1355: 1321: 1305: 1273: 1241: 434: 482: 1414:
Detail are for the body, and much of this is not even in the body (such as the name of the operation).
1856: 1809: 1774: 1757: 1724: 1691: 1660: 1627: 1592: 1499: 1466: 1435: 1404: 1371: 1336: 1289: 1257: 1224: 1073: 464: 367: 410: 350: 318: 174: 68: 1206:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
960:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
734:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
718: 342: 235: 83: 1832:. It does not matter what they think, what matters is what others think of their theories. Also 1057: 1036: 395: 1736:
I disagree, and as far as I can tell neither of the sources even mention the training exercise.
1980: 1931: 1867: 1837: 1789: 1737: 1704: 1671: 1640: 1607: 1569: 1479: 1446: 1415: 1384: 1351: 1317: 1301: 1269: 1237: 430: 64: 1822: 516: 495: 450: 293: 232: 284: 1852: 1833: 1825: 1805: 1770: 1753: 1720: 1687: 1656: 1623: 1588: 1495: 1462: 1431: 1400: 1367: 1332: 1285: 1253: 1220: 944: 869: 702: 681: 1347: 617: 596: 406: 357:
exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
938: 928: 901: 1997: 1785: 1086: 537: 533: 1959: 1829: 1603: 731: 1063: 934: 708: 541: 1568:
What sources say the training exercise is the most common conspiracy theory?
1445:
No "Omit" MOVE. And yes, we give details, if we mention it we need context.
1085:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 309:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 957: 1004: 529: 1821:
I think it is time for others to chip in now. I can't say more than
813: 786: 331: 1169: 458: 390: 362: 326: 279: 244: 236: 28: 15: 1003: 868: 1314:
And "Operation Closed Campus" was canceled (after threats)
1192:
Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories
349:. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If 38:
Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories
1199: 1195: 1186: 1181: 173: 956:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 730:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 528:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 835:Knowledge:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography 2084:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles 838:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography 2129:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance 270:regarding potentially objectionable content and 262:Images or details contained within this article 46:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1804:should be explained for informational purposes. 2074:Low-importance Serial killer-related articles 345:while commenting or presenting evidence, and 187: 8: 2009:Knowledge articles that use American English 1928:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Mcelite 1557:The following discussion has been closed. 1548: 1173: 1031: 896: 781: 676: 591: 490: 297:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 2034:Mid-importance Alternative Views articles 1552:Discussion with a now-blocked sockpuppet 264:may be graphic or otherwise objectionable 1953:This is in the news and should be added. 1180:Text and/or other creative content from 822:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography 377:on 16 January 2013 (UTC). The result of 1866:You do not have consensus, so stop now. 1033: 898: 783: 678: 639:Knowledge:WikiProject Alternative Views 593: 492: 462: 443:) on 18 December 2013 with the comment: 419:) on 18 December 2013 with the comment: 2069:C-Class Serial killer-related articles 2039:WikiProject Alternative Views articles 642:Template:WikiProject Alternative Views 2124:Low-importance United States articles 2064:Low-importance Crime-related articles 317:, this should not be changed without 7: 2104:Mid-importance gun politics articles 1346:It is still too much detail for the 1079:This article is within the scope of 950:This article is within the scope of 819:This article is within the scope of 724:This article is within the scope of 623:This article is within the scope of 522:This article is within the scope of 2049:Low-importance Connecticut articles 1703:They are part of the same sentence. 1126:Knowledge:WikiProject United States 481:It is of interest to the following 36:for discussing improvements to the 2134:WikiProject United States articles 2029:C-Class Alternative Views articles 2019:Low-importance Skepticism articles 1129:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 744:Knowledge:WikiProject Connecticut 2109:Gun politics task force articles 2094:Low-importance politics articles 2054:WikiProject Connecticut articles 1066: 1056: 1035: 937: 927: 900: 812: 785: 747:Template:WikiProject Connecticut 711: 701: 680: 616: 595: 554:Knowledge:WikiProject Skepticism 515: 494: 463: 394: 366: 330: 283: 248: 218: 58:Click here to start a new topic. 2024:WikiProject Skepticism articles 2004:Knowledge objectionable content 1430:if I can tighten it up anymore. 1146:This article has been rated as 990:This article has been rated as 855:This article has been rated as 798:Serial, mass, and spree killers 764:This article has been rated as 659:This article has been rated as 574:This article has been rated as 557:Template:WikiProject Skepticism 373:This article was nominated for 272:options for not seeing an image 2119:C-Class United States articles 2059:C-Class Crime-related articles 970:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 268:Knowledge's content disclaimer 1: 2114:WikiProject Politics articles 2099:C-Class gun politics articles 1012:This article is supported by 973:Template:WikiProject Politics 964:and see a list of open tasks. 877:This article is supported by 829:and see a list of open tasks. 738:and see a list of open tasks. 626:WikiProject Alternative views 548:and see a list of open tasks. 55:Put new text under old text. 2044:C-Class Connecticut articles 1300:to the appropriate sections? 880:the Serial Killer task force 832:Crime and Criminal Biography 793:Crime and Criminal Biography 447:Knowledge:Offensive material 347:do not make personal attacks 2014:C-Class Skepticism articles 1989:11:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC) 1974:07:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC) 63:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2150: 1639:NO, we need one saying it. 1152:project's importance scale 996:project's importance scale 861:project's importance scale 770:project's importance scale 665:project's importance scale 645:Alternative Views articles 580:project's importance scale 2089:C-Class politics articles 1949:Alex Jones loses lawsuits 1943:13:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC) 1876:17:42, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1861:17:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1846:17:08, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1814:16:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1798:16:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1779:16:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1762:16:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1746:16:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1729:16:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1713:16:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1696:16:22, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1680:16:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1670:That is not what it says. 1665:16:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1649:16:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1632:16:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1616:16:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1597:16:08, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1578:16:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1504:15:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1488:15:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1471:15:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1455:15:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1440:15:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1424:15:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1409:15:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1393:15:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1376:15:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1360:15:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1341:15:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1326:15:09, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1310:15:08, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1294:14:56, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1278:14:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1262:14:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1246:14:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1229:14:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC) 1190:was copied or moved into 1145: 1082:WikiProject United States 1051: 1011: 989: 922: 876: 854: 807: 763: 696: 658: 611: 573: 510: 489: 257:Knowledge is not censored 93:Be welcoming to newcomers 22:Skip to table of contents 2079:Serial Killer task force 1560:Please do not modify it. 1087:United States of America 21: 1316:], we need to say that. 1015:Gun politics task force 727:WikiProject Connecticut 1132:United States articles 1008: 873: 841:Crime-related articles 525:WikiProject Skepticism 471:This article is rated 88:avoid personal attacks 1007: 872: 403:proposed for deletion 212:Auto-archiving period 113:Neutral point of view 1198:. The former page's 1074:United States portal 953:WikiProject Politics 750:Connecticut articles 315:relevant style guide 311:varieties of English 118:No original research 1926:Sock edits struck ( 1204:provide attribution 1100:Articles Requested! 560:Skepticism articles 313:. According to the 1009: 874: 719:Connecticut portal 477:content assessment 99:dispute resolution 60: 1923: 1922: 1210: 1209: 1166: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1158: 1157: 1030: 1029: 1026: 1025: 976:politics articles 895: 894: 891: 890: 780: 779: 776: 775: 675: 674: 671: 670: 636:Alternative Views 603:Alternative Views 590: 589: 586: 585: 457: 456: 453: 423: 389: 388: 361: 360: 325: 324: 278: 277: 243: 242: 79:Assume good faith 56: 27: 26: 2141: 1969: 1967: 1966: 1939: 1934: 1562: 1549: 1189: 1177: 1176: 1170: 1134: 1133: 1130: 1127: 1124: 1076: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1060: 1053: 1052: 1047: 1039: 1032: 978: 977: 974: 971: 968: 947: 942: 941: 931: 924: 923: 918: 915: 904: 897: 843: 842: 839: 836: 833: 816: 809: 808: 803: 800: 789: 782: 752: 751: 748: 745: 742: 721: 716: 715: 714: 705: 698: 697: 692: 684: 677: 647: 646: 643: 640: 637: 620: 613: 612: 607: 599: 592: 562: 561: 558: 555: 552: 519: 512: 511: 506: 498: 491: 474: 468: 467: 459: 445: 421: 398: 391: 370: 363: 353:is not reached, 334: 333: 327: 294:American English 290:This article is 287: 280: 252: 245: 237: 223: 222: 213: 192: 191: 177: 108:Article policies 29: 16: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2140: 2139: 2138: 1994: 1993: 1964: 1962: 1960: 1951: 1937: 1932: 1558: 1547: 1268:they are facts. 1215: 1185: 1174: 1131: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1106:Become a Member 1072: 1067: 1065: 1045: 975: 972: 969: 966: 965: 945:Politics portal 943: 936: 916: 910: 840: 837: 834: 831: 830: 801: 795: 749: 746: 743: 740: 739: 717: 712: 710: 690: 644: 641: 638: 635: 634: 605: 559: 556: 553: 550: 549: 504: 475:on Knowledge's 472: 355:other solutions 319:broad consensus 239: 238: 233: 210: 134: 129: 128: 127: 104: 74: 12: 11: 5: 2147: 2145: 2137: 2136: 2131: 2126: 2121: 2116: 2111: 2106: 2101: 2096: 2091: 2086: 2081: 2076: 2071: 2066: 2061: 2056: 2051: 2046: 2041: 2036: 2031: 2026: 2021: 2016: 2011: 2006: 1996: 1995: 1992: 1991: 1950: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1765: 1564: 1563: 1554: 1553: 1546: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1312: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1202:now serves to 1178: 1164: 1163: 1160: 1159: 1156: 1155: 1148:Low-importance 1144: 1138: 1137: 1135: 1119: 1118: 1113: 1108: 1103: 1096: 1094:Template Usage 1090: 1078: 1077: 1061: 1049: 1048: 1046:Low‑importance 1040: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1020:Mid-importance 1010: 1000: 999: 992:Low-importance 988: 982: 981: 979: 962:the discussion 949: 948: 932: 920: 919: 917:Low‑importance 905: 893: 892: 889: 888: 885:Low-importance 875: 865: 864: 857:Low-importance 853: 847: 846: 844: 827:the discussion 817: 805: 804: 802:Low‑importance 790: 778: 777: 774: 773: 766:Low-importance 762: 756: 755: 753: 736:the discussion 723: 722: 706: 694: 693: 691:Low‑importance 685: 673: 672: 669: 668: 661:Mid-importance 657: 651: 650: 648: 621: 609: 608: 606:Mid‑importance 600: 588: 587: 584: 583: 576:Low-importance 572: 566: 565: 563: 546:the discussion 520: 508: 507: 505:Low‑importance 499: 487: 486: 480: 469: 455: 454: 444: 424: 420: 401:This page was 399: 387: 386: 379:the discussion 371: 359: 358: 335: 323: 322: 288: 276: 275: 261: 253: 241: 240: 231: 229: 228: 225: 224: 194: 193: 131: 130: 126: 125: 120: 115: 106: 105: 103: 102: 95: 90: 81: 75: 73: 72: 61: 52: 51: 48: 47: 41: 25: 24: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2146: 2135: 2132: 2130: 2127: 2125: 2122: 2120: 2117: 2115: 2112: 2110: 2107: 2105: 2102: 2100: 2097: 2095: 2092: 2090: 2087: 2085: 2082: 2080: 2077: 2075: 2072: 2070: 2067: 2065: 2062: 2060: 2057: 2055: 2052: 2050: 2047: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2032: 2030: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2020: 2017: 2015: 2012: 2010: 2007: 2005: 2002: 2001: 1999: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1955: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1935: 1929: 1925: 1924: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1766: 1764: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1566: 1565: 1561: 1556: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1544: 1506: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1313: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1213:Edits to lede 1212: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1188: 1183: 1179: 1172: 1171: 1168: 1153: 1149: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1136: 1123:United States 1117: 1114: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1088: 1084: 1083: 1075: 1064: 1062: 1059: 1055: 1054: 1050: 1044: 1043:United States 1041: 1038: 1034: 1021: 1018:(assessed as 1017: 1016: 1006: 1002: 1001: 997: 993: 987: 984: 983: 980: 963: 959: 955: 954: 946: 940: 935: 933: 930: 926: 925: 921: 914: 909: 906: 903: 899: 886: 883:(assessed as 882: 881: 871: 867: 866: 862: 858: 852: 849: 848: 845: 828: 824: 823: 818: 815: 811: 810: 806: 799: 794: 791: 788: 784: 771: 767: 761: 758: 757: 754: 737: 733: 729: 728: 720: 709: 707: 704: 700: 699: 695: 689: 686: 683: 679: 666: 662: 656: 653: 652: 649: 632: 628: 627: 622: 619: 615: 614: 610: 604: 601: 598: 594: 581: 577: 571: 568: 567: 564: 547: 543: 539: 538:pseudohistory 535: 534:pseudoscience 531: 527: 526: 521: 518: 514: 513: 509: 503: 500: 497: 493: 488: 484: 478: 470: 466: 461: 460: 452: 448: 442: 439: 436: 432: 428: 418: 415: 412: 408: 404: 400: 397: 393: 392: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 365: 364: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 329: 328: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 295: 289: 286: 282: 281: 273: 269: 265: 259: 258: 254: 251: 247: 246: 227: 226: 221: 217: 209: 205: 202: 200: 196: 195: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 133: 132: 124: 123:Verifiability 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 110: 109: 100: 96: 94: 91: 89: 85: 82: 80: 77: 76: 70: 66: 65:Learn to edit 62: 59: 54: 53: 50: 49: 45: 39: 35: 31: 30: 23: 20: 18: 17: 1981:Slatersteven 1958: 1957: 1952: 1868:Slatersteven 1850: 1838:Slatersteven 1802: 1790:Slatersteven 1767: 1750: 1738:Slatersteven 1717: 1705:Slatersteven 1684: 1672:Slatersteven 1653: 1641:Slatersteven 1620: 1608:Slatersteven 1585: 1570:Slatersteven 1567: 1559: 1545:Most commone 1492: 1480:Slatersteven 1459: 1447:Slatersteven 1428: 1416:Slatersteven 1397: 1385:Slatersteven 1364: 1352:Slatersteven 1330: 1318:Slatersteven 1302:Slatersteven 1282: 1270:Slatersteven 1250: 1238:Slatersteven 1236:wrongdoing). 1217: 1216: 1182:this version 1167: 1147: 1111:Project Talk 1099: 1080: 1013: 991: 951: 913:Gun politics 878: 856: 820: 765: 725: 660: 624: 575: 523: 483:WikiProjects 437: 431:SuperHamster 413: 383:no consensus 382: 337:Please stay 306: 302: 298: 291: 255: 215: 197: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 107: 32:This is the 741:Connecticut 732:Connecticut 688:Connecticut 292:written in 161:free images 44:not a forum 1998:Categories 1853:WillieP100 1806:WillieP100 1771:WillieP100 1754:WillieP100 1721:WillieP100 1688:WillieP100 1657:WillieP100 1624:WillieP100 1589:WillieP100 1496:WillieP100 1494:paragraph. 1463:WillieP100 1432:WillieP100 1401:WillieP100 1368:WillieP100 1333:WillieP100 1286:WillieP100 1254:WillieP100 1221:WillieP100 631:discussion 551:Skepticism 542:skepticism 502:Skepticism 1823:wp:fringe 1461:unwieldy. 1196:this edit 451:WP:CENSOR 427:contested 407:Wyatt 151 351:consensus 101:if needed 84:Be polite 34:talk page 1834:wp:crime 1826:wp:undue 1719:clarity. 1655:others.' 1187:InfoWars 967:Politics 958:politics 908:Politics 441:contribs 417:contribs 375:deletion 307:traveled 199:Archives 69:get help 42:This is 40:article. 1938:Neonate 1348:wp:lede 1200:history 1150:on the 994:on the 859:on the 768:on the 663:on the 578:on the 530:science 473:C-class 425:It was 303:defense 216:60 days 167:WP refs 155:scholar 1786:wp:blp 1686:reads. 1116:Alerts 479:scale. 449:& 139:Google 1933:Paleo 1830:wp:rs 1752:them. 1604:wp:or 1194:with 343:civil 299:color 182:JSTOR 143:books 97:Seek 1985:talk 1961:♦Ian 1930:), — 1872:talk 1857:talk 1842:talk 1828:and 1810:talk 1794:talk 1775:talk 1758:talk 1742:talk 1725:talk 1709:talk 1692:talk 1676:talk 1661:talk 1645:talk 1628:talk 1612:talk 1593:talk 1574:talk 1500:talk 1484:talk 1467:talk 1451:talk 1436:talk 1420:talk 1405:talk 1389:talk 1372:talk 1356:talk 1337:talk 1322:talk 1306:talk 1290:talk 1274:talk 1258:talk 1242:talk 1225:talk 540:and 435:talk 411:talk 381:was 341:and 339:calm 175:FENS 149:news 86:and 1184:of 1142:Low 986:Low 851:Low 760:Low 655:Mid 570:Low 429:by 405:by 189:TWL 2000:: 1987:) 1968:M♦ 1963:Ma 1956:-- 1941:– 1874:) 1859:) 1844:) 1812:) 1796:) 1777:) 1760:) 1744:) 1727:) 1711:) 1694:) 1678:) 1663:) 1647:) 1630:) 1614:) 1595:) 1576:) 1502:) 1486:) 1469:) 1453:) 1438:) 1422:) 1407:) 1391:) 1374:) 1358:) 1339:) 1324:) 1308:) 1292:) 1276:) 1260:) 1244:) 1227:) 1022:). 911:: 887:). 796:: 536:, 532:, 305:, 301:, 214:: 206:, 169:) 67:; 1983:( 1965:c 1870:( 1855:( 1840:( 1808:( 1792:( 1788:. 1773:( 1756:( 1740:( 1723:( 1707:( 1690:( 1674:( 1659:( 1643:( 1626:( 1610:( 1606:. 1591:( 1572:( 1498:( 1482:( 1465:( 1449:( 1434:( 1418:( 1403:( 1387:( 1370:( 1354:( 1350:. 1335:( 1320:( 1304:( 1288:( 1272:( 1256:( 1240:( 1223:( 1154:. 998:. 863:. 772:. 667:. 633:. 582:. 485:: 438:· 433:( 414:· 409:( 385:. 321:. 274:. 260:. 208:2 204:1 201:: 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 71:.

Index

Skip to table of contents
talk page
Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
2

Censorship warning
Knowledge is not censored

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑