292:
cannibalism was very behavioral. I added some grammatical errors such as “the coercive and the cooperative ways” and edited minor errors such as “ways of fighting different prey off as well” instead of predator. I removed “animals” from the “bites” header as it only included bites to humans. Overall I thought your article was very solid. One thing that could be changed is “social behavior.” A lot of the points written in that section appears to be equally relatable to mating behavior so the information under this subheader could be moved to mating behavior.
312:
online; in you last reference of the first section I show you an example of how to do it for you other references (see reference number 6 of your entry). I made some minor grammatical changes; I really like the way is written. Also, you should add the map of the distribution of this species, you say in your leading section that it is found in North
America, but I’m not sure you mean that it is found also in Canada and Mexico or only in the US.
157:
21:
208:
section up to the Lead
Section, since this is often what determines if the viewer will continue reading and catch their attention. I specified where in North America they are found. Under Webs, I added an explanation of "exploitative competition." Under Mate searching behavior, I included more information on cuticular hydrocarbons. Under Physiology, I added further explanation on hydraulic locomotion.
232:
67:
119:
98:
396:
207:
I thought that this article had a significant amount of detailed information! I italicized all of the scientific names throughout the article, embedded links on less well-known words, fixed some small typos, removed some unnecessary commas, and split up a couple run-on sentences. I moved the
Overview
359:
be at the imprecise vernacular name, that does not mean it is the only name that it should be referenced by. especially considering that "wolf spider" is not a precise name at all. as has been noted elsewhere, there is a major difference between brevity and conciseness. Stating the scientific name
291:
I thought this was a really solid
Knowledge article with really well written descriptions. I added some links on words such as “tufts” and “amputation” so that readers could better understand the article. I made the header “mating behavior” instead of just “mating” as the content, such as sexual
311:
I really like your entry; it is really well organized! I feel that this could be a “Good article” if you include more information in each of your sections. I have some suggestions: I went through your references and I realized they do not have the link to the website in which they are available
331:
adds duplicate specification of which family the species belongs to. We should not specify twice in the first sentence which family the species belongs to. Duplicate statements is almost allways wrong, especially in the very first sentence. Adding the scientific name of the family does not add
550:
Regrettably, I'll have to fail this nomination because there's been no engagement. (The nominator edited as part of a Wiki Ed class and has not been active in months.) The article really isn't all that far from GA status, so I hope that other contributors continue to improve it.
483:
I'll be glad to take a look at this article. Since this nomination appears to be the result of a Wiki Ed class, I'll just make a few preliminary comments for now. If you're still willing to work on the article, just respond to the comments and I'll keep on reviewing.
244:
585:
3a: Numerous paragraphs and sections are very short, suggesting to me that some necessary content is lacking. While I needn't decide one way or the other, future contributors are encouraged either to consolidate these paragraphs or to expand
360:
is being concise and not being duplicitous. Also it is false to say that "wikipedia" considers that the most natural name of the family. it only means the placement has not been questioned.--
174:
401:
536:, just in case the first notifications didn't go through. Let me know if you're still interested in working on this; otherwise I'll close the review in a few days.
434:
514:, it's preferable to be a bit more specific, like "According to biologist Mary Smith..." or "A 2016 study by arachnologists John Smith and Jane Johnson found..."
566:; the article ought to say when/by whom each fact was found. The information on melanization is found only in the lead; it should also appear in the body per
424:
504:
There are several short paragraphs of two or three sentences. If possible, I would recommend either expanding them or merging them with nearby paragraphs.
268:
646:
473:
164:
32:
406:
651:
636:
641:
555:
1a: The article could be written somewhat more formally (e.g. cut "you" and the contractions), but that's probably not a dealbreaker. A
135:
52:
429:
38:
297:
126:
103:
610:
541:
523:
489:
467:
371:
78:
452:
43:
507:
There are a few body paragraphs (e.g. in the "Molting" section) that lack citations but would seem to require them.
293:
256:
618:
606:
537:
519:
485:
463:
66:
448:
317:
213:
84:
340:, is therefore irrelevant. It is a personal view that is in contradiction with the Knowledge view. --
336:. This means that the Knowledge view is that that is the most natural name for it. The edit comment
134:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
614:
556:
533:
276:
248:
235:
This article was the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
201:
197:
48:
366:
345:
313:
260:
252:
209:
332:
information about the species. Knowledge has an article about this family. It is named
156:
630:
272:
338:
Most readers won't known the family name for wolf spiders, which is why it is stated
361:
341:
333:
231:
563:
511:
622:
545:
527:
493:
477:
374:
349:
301:
280:
217:
455:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
118:
97:
567:
196:
This article was created by the bot
Qbugbot. For more information, see
131:
613:) 05:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC) Hi, I will make these changes this week.
559:
copy-edit would likely be useful in ironing out the occasional typo.
518:
Once these issues are addressed, I'll have more to say. Cheers!
60:
15:
510:
You use the phrase "it was found" five times. According to
562:
1b: The phrase "was found" is used five times. This is a
328:
41:
at the time (April 6, 2021). There are suggestions on
226:
Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment
130:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
47:for improving the article. If you can improve it,
200:. For questions and comments, leave a message at
8:
576:2b: Four paragraphs lack citations entirely.
384:
92:
64:
269:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
415:
387:
267:Above undated message substituted from
94:
20:
7:
124:This article is within the scope of
83:It is of interest to the following
240:
236:
14:
243:. Further details are available
230:
155:
117:
96:
65:
19:
647:Low-importance Spiders articles
320:) 23:40, 3 November 2020 (CST)
169:This article has been rated as
1:
570:. (It also needs a citation.)
375:00:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
355:While the family article may
350:17:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
144:Knowledge:WikiProject Spiders
138:and see a list of open tasks.
33:Natural sciences good article
652:WikiProject Spiders articles
637:Former good article nominees
281:03:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
218:23:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
147:Template:WikiProject Spiders
642:Stub-Class Spiders articles
453:Talk:Schizocosa ocreata/GA1
302:19:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
668:
546:23:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
528:23:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
494:23:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
478:23:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
175:project's importance scale
37:, but it did not meet the
623:10:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
168:
112:
91:
598:6a: No apparent issues
73:This article is rated
592:4: No apparent issues
532:Here's another ping,
247:. Student editor(s):
39:good article criteria
324:Stating family twice
294:shutaro.hayashihara
257:Shutaro.hayashihara
127:WikiProject Spiders
29:was nominated as a
607:Extraordinary Writ
538:Extraordinary Writ
520:Extraordinary Writ
486:Extraordinary Writ
464:Extraordinary Writ
251:. Peer reviewers:
245:on the course page
79:content assessment
27:Schizocosa ocreata
443:
442:
237:15 September 2020
202:User:Qbugbot/talk
198:User:Qbugbot/info
189:
188:
185:
184:
181:
180:
59:
58:
51:; it may then be
659:
397:Copyvio detector
385:
369:
364:
283:
242:
241:17 December 2020
238:
234:
159:
152:
151:
150:Spiders articles
148:
145:
142:
121:
114:
113:
108:
100:
93:
76:
70:
69:
61:
23:
22:
16:
667:
666:
662:
661:
660:
658:
657:
656:
627:
626:
501:
447:This review is
439:
411:
383:
367:
362:
326:
309:
289:
266:
228:
194:
149:
146:
143:
140:
139:
106:
77:on Knowledge's
74:
44:the review page
12:
11:
5:
665:
663:
655:
654:
649:
644:
639:
629:
628:
603:
602:
599:
596:
593:
590:
587:
583:
580:
577:
574:
571:
564:weasel wording
560:
516:
515:
508:
505:
500:
497:
482:
458:
457:
441:
440:
438:
437:
432:
427:
421:
418:
417:
413:
412:
410:
409:
407:External links
404:
399:
393:
390:
389:
382:
379:
378:
377:
325:
322:
308:
305:
288:
285:
227:
224:
222:
193:
190:
187:
186:
183:
182:
179:
178:
171:Low-importance
167:
161:
160:
153:
136:the discussion
122:
110:
109:
107:Low‑importance
101:
89:
88:
82:
71:
57:
56:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
664:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
634:
632:
625:
624:
620:
616:
615:Wikispiders11
612:
608:
600:
597:
594:
591:
588:
584:
581:
578:
575:
572:
569:
565:
561:
558:
554:
553:
552:
548:
547:
543:
539:
535:
534:Wikispiders11
530:
529:
525:
521:
513:
509:
506:
503:
502:
498:
496:
495:
491:
487:
480:
479:
475:
472:
469:
465:
462:
456:
454:
450:
445:
444:
436:
433:
431:
428:
426:
423:
422:
420:
419:
414:
408:
405:
403:
400:
398:
395:
394:
392:
391:
386:
380:
376:
373:
370:
365:
358:
354:
353:
352:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
330:
323:
321:
319:
315:
306:
304:
303:
299:
295:
286:
284:
282:
278:
274:
270:
264:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:Wikispiders11
246:
233:
225:
223:
220:
219:
215:
211:
205:
203:
199:
191:
176:
172:
166:
163:
162:
158:
154:
137:
133:
129:
128:
123:
120:
116:
115:
111:
105:
102:
99:
95:
90:
86:
80:
72:
68:
63:
62:
54:
50:
46:
45:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
18:
17:
604:
549:
531:
517:
481:
470:
460:
459:
446:
435:Instructions
356:
337:
327:
310:
307:Student Edit
290:
287:Student Edit
265:
229:
221:
206:
195:
170:
125:
85:WikiProjects
42:
31:
30:
26:
557:WP:GOCE/REQ
449:transcluded
334:wolf spider
314:Salazarjhan
261:Salazarjhan
253:Mlschoening
210:Mlschoening
53:renominated
631:Categories
512:MOS:WEASEL
402:Authorship
388:GA toolbox
75:Stub-class
461:Reviewer:
425:Templates
416:Reviewing
381:GA Review
357:currently
329:This edit
49:please do
605:Cheers,
601:6b: Pass
589:3b: Pass
582:2d: Pass
579:2c: Pass
573:2a: Pass
568:MOS:LEAD
474:contribs
430:Criteria
273:PrimeBOT
192:Untitled
595:5: Pass
173:on the
141:Spiders
132:Spiders
104:Spiders
499:Review
342:Ettrig
81:scale.
451:from
619:talk
611:talk
586:them
542:talk
524:talk
490:talk
468:talk
346:talk
318:talk
298:talk
277:talk
239:and
214:talk
368:min
363:Kev
271:by
165:Low
633::
621:)
544:)
526:)
492:)
476:)
348:)
300:)
279:)
263:.
259:,
255:,
216:)
204:.
617:(
609:(
540:(
522:(
488:(
471:·
466:(
372:§
344:(
316:(
296:(
275:(
212:(
177:.
87::
55:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
