396:
1146:"Attitudes towards scientific subjects seem to be often caused by fear of rejection in social groups. For instance, climate change is perceived as a threat by only 22% of Americans on the right side of the political spectrum, but by 85% on the left. That is, if someone on the left would not consider climate change as a threat, this person may face contempt and be rejected in that social group. In fact, people may rather deny a scientifically accepted fact than lose or jeopardize their social status."
1193:"There are a lot of terms for this in modern psychology, political science, sociology, and so on—I prefer “tribal psychology,” but it’s also called “extreme partisanship,” “cultural cognition,” et cetera. Whatever the label, the latest evidence coming out of social science is clear: humans value being good members of their groups much more than they value being right, so much so that as long as the group satisfies those needs, we will choose to be wrong if it keeps us in good standing with our peers.
426:
1068:"Anti-science attitudes seem to be often caused by fear of rejection in social groups. For instance, climate change is perceived as a threat by only 22% of Americans on the right side of the political spectrum, but by 85% on the left. That is, if someone on the left would not consider climate change as a threat, this person may face contempt and be rejected in that social group. In fact, people may rather deny a scientifically accepted fact than lose or jeopardize their social status."
490:
748:
727:
699:
480:
459:
306:
758:
917:
899:
836:
852:
1329:
276:
417:
21:
601:
574:
963:
1643:
1374:
611:
1202:
So, while I think important claims like this could do with more rigorous sourcing than this, which is definitely anecdotal and narrative rather than wholly scientific itself—if this is the source we're writing from, "desire for acceptance" represents the text less well. More extreme versions of such
1183:
Humans aren’t just social animals; we are ultra-social animals. We are the kind of primate that survives by forming and maintaining groups. Much of our innate psychology is all about grouping up and then nurturing that group—working to curate cohesion. If the group survives, we survive. So a lot of
1280:
As this is an article of such a broad scope, I think it may be better to simply remove "current" stuff (such as the COVID and global warming controversies) and keep the article as timeless as possible. There are plenty of other articles with a more specific focus where those controversies can be
1184:
our drives, our motivations, like shame, embarrassment, ostracism, and so on, have more to do with keeping the group strong than keeping any one member, including ourselves, healthy. In other words, we are willing to sacrifice ourselves and others for the group, if it comes to that.
1567:
I mean, it is recognizable as related to/involving the common sense, but the term is used in a specific way and has a specific history, but I'm not quite sure whether that's enough to say it's not a "common word being used in a straightforward manner".
521:
186:
1725:
1011:
1790:
1050:
1765:
1281:
explained. I would also remove the table with the opinions on global warming divided by political party: that's just a controversy specific to the US and it is irrelevant elsewhere.
1715:
1700:
1730:
1740:
556:
546:
1770:
267:
1745:
395:
632:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
1760:
1071:
it seems like the opposite example would fit better with this sentence? This seems to imply that the 'anti-science attitude' is seeing climate change as a threat.
180:
1160:
Also maybe 'desire for acceptance' or something similar instead of 'fear of rejection', not for any specific reason but I think it carries a more neutral tone?
516:
1508:? That's the only reason why I unlinked it. I also believe that the average user would know what testable/testability means and how it is used in a sentence.
1755:
1735:
1198:
When I asked sociologist Brooke
Harrington her thoughts on all this, she summed it up by saying, if there was an E=mc of social science, it would be SD : -->
659:
928:
904:
669:
1229:
You seem to know more than I do so I'm going to bow out of this discussion, I was just trying to point out something in the article that felt off to me.
1045:
The article says that there are three main branches: the natural sciences, the social sciences and the formal sciences. Where do the literature sciences
112:
1710:
1174:
It should reflect what the source says, as neutral point of view is not "no point of view": Cracking open the source, though there's no page cited in
1780:
814:
804:
706:
584:
512:
503:
464:
379:
1720:
872:
39:
1695:
634:
118:
1750:
1086:
How about simply "attitudes about science", because that's what the data is actually saying, is that such attitudes are socially informed.
1785:
1026:
1015:
860:
780:
1010:
Just because history of science is about science doesn’t mean it’s science itself.Science describes studying nature of the universe.
1775:
1054:
1676:
624:
579:
430:
30:
1705:
132:
77:
63:
137:
53:
1458:
it's a very underdeveloped page though—which I do see as a potential reason one would link a related-enough page instead.
771:
732:
107:
439:
1672:
1208:
511:
content on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
508:
331:
201:
98:
1601:
from the incipit. Links to all relevant philosophical concepts are already present in
Philosophy of Science section.
1409:
In the first sentence of the page, from the words "testable hypotheses", it has rececently been removed the link to
168:
275:
223:
218:
868:
495:
335:
286:
1243:
I think you raised a good point! I was just giving my opinion, sorry if it came off a bit strong. Feel free to
1335:
1030:
988:
851:
263:
142:
1433:, but maybe the users that did the edits had good reasons to remove/change the link. What's your opinion?
1361:
1286:
1234:
1165:
1151:
1113:
1076:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
162:
445:
34:
1357:
1122:
I'm not sure how you could say that support of something and rejection of something aren't related.
416:
158:
1654:
1606:
1438:
996:
339:
194:
88:
779:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1627:
1580:
1537:
1491:
1470:
1308:
1255:
1219:
1130:
1094:
291:
103:
208:
1392:
1282:
1230:
1161:
1147:
1109:
1072:
995:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
616:
84:
1244:
975:
314:
288:
1356:
Add link to “physics” page in the list of natural sciences. (Sentence 2, just after ref.3)
305:
1598:
1430:
1418:
1204:
1671:
No strong opinions here; my only concern is that the testability article is very short.
747:
726:
1650:
1602:
1558:
1516:
1434:
763:
402:
698:
479:
458:
1689:
1617:
1570:
1527:
1481:
1460:
1449:
1301:
1297:
1248:
1212:
1123:
1087:
174:
1383:
923:
757:
916:
898:
1453:
1426:
1410:
1105:
1104:
I don't know that that makes sense, because the paragraph is from the article "
1140:
OH I thought you meant changing the entire paragraph. I see what you mean now.
753:
629:
606:
485:
1552:
1510:
864:
330:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
1296:
I agree partly, perhaps with COVID, but I think climate change is likely
20:
1505:
983:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
776:
628:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
57:
600:
573:
290:
1046:
1680:
1658:
1635:
1610:
1588:
1562:
1545:
1520:
1499:
1442:
1398:
1365:
1323:
1313:
1290:
1260:
1238:
1224:
1169:
1155:
1135:
1117:
1099:
1080:
1058:
1034:
1019:
957:
880:
The rationale behind the request is: "Level-1 vital article".
846:
830:
410:
300:
292:
48:
15:
871:
of this article to be created. For further information, see
697:
1199:
PD, “social death is more frightening than physical death.”
43:. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
515:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1203:
tone problems can be considered editorializing, and even
1422:
1414:
372:
1597:
Good point. I therefore propose to remove the link to
1456:
seems much more general and less potentially leading.
193:
1726:
Knowledge level-1 vital articles in
Physical sciences
775:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
680:
987:] The anchor (Elements of the scientific method)
1791:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
1417:, and subsequently another user added a link to
66:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1320:Semi-protected edit request on 8 September 2024
1108:". (unrelated, love the number theory userbox)
37:by Knowledge editors, which on 6 June 2024 was
1766:High-importance philosophy of science articles
1047:https://de.wikipedia.org/Literaturwissenschaft
1716:Knowledge vital articles in Physical sciences
1191:
1181:
522:History of Science Collaboration of the Month
207:
8:
1701:Knowledge articles that use American English
1731:B-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
1525:It's borderline as a term of art, I think.
1429:is a better explanation of "testable" than
938:Knowledge:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
403:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive
1741:Top-importance history of science articles
1041:Three main branches and literature science
941:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
893:
721:
677:
568:
453:
351:
347:
318:, which has its own spelling conventions (
1771:Philosophy of science task force articles
507:, an attempt to improve and organize the
1448:In the best-case scenario it's still an
531:Knowledge:WikiProject History of Science
1746:WikiProject History of Science articles
895:
723:
570:
534:Template:WikiProject History of Science
455:
414:
1761:B-Class philosophy of science articles
1012:2601:600:C881:6C10:BC2B:559A:3F41:1961
638:about philosophy content on Knowledge.
338:, this should not be changed without
7:
1051:2003:C5:8740:4F00:4D80:D5B8:EBF:82AB
769:This article is within the scope of
622:This article is within the scope of
1756:High-importance Philosophy articles
1736:B-Class history of science articles
56:for discussing improvements to the
14:
1711:Knowledge level-1 vital articles
1641:
1372:
1327:
1205:assigning undue weight to claims
961:
915:
897:
850:
834:
756:
746:
725:
644:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy
609:
599:
572:
488:
478:
457:
424:
415:
394:
304:
274:
78:Click here to start a new topic.
19:
1781:Top-importance science articles
1405:Testability or Verificationism?
809:This article has been rated as
664:This article has been rated as
647:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
551:This article has been rated as
1721:B-Class level-1 vital articles
1681:16:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
1659:13:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1636:14:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
1611:14:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
1589:14:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
1563:14:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
1546:13:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
1521:13:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
1500:13:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
1478:13:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
1443:12:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
944:Guild of Copy Editors articles
519:. You can also help with the
504:History of Science WikiProject
444:It is of interest to multiple
1:
1399:01:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1366:22:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
1178:, here's a pertinent excerpt:
1035:20:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
789:Knowledge:WikiProject Science
783:and see a list of open tasks.
405:for the week of May 29, 2007.
75:Put new text under old text.
1696:Old requests for peer review
1059:15:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
874:WikiProject Spoken Knowledge
792:Template:WikiProject Science
501:This article is part of the
1751:B-Class Philosophy articles
1350:to reactivate your request.
1338:has been answered. Set the
537:history of science articles
83:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1807:
1020:06:01, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
815:project's importance scale
670:project's importance scale
557:project's importance scale
1786:Spoken Knowledge requests
1628:
1581:
1538:
1492:
1471:
1314:14:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
1309:
1291:14:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
1261:23:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
1256:
1239:23:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
1225:22:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
1220:
1170:22:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
1156:22:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
1136:22:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
1131:
1118:22:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
1100:22:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
1095:
1081:22:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
910:
845:
808:
741:
705:
676:
663:
594:
550:
496:History of science portal
473:
452:
354:
350:
113:Be welcoming to newcomers
1776:B-Class science articles
1673:– Closed Limelike Curves
401:This article was on the
841:Other talk page banners
681:Associated task forces:
380:WikiProject peer review
1706:B-Class vital articles
1195:
1186:
1064:Anti-Science attitudes
1006:The History of Science
702:
625:WikiProject Philosophy
108:avoid personal attacks
1143:Maybe something like:
935:Guild of Copy Editors
929:Guild of Copy Editors
905:Guild of Copy Editors
707:Philosophy of science
701:
431:level-1 vital article
268:Auto-archiving period
133:Neutral point of view
1247:and make your edit.
1209:WP:original research
926:by a member of the
336:relevant style guide
332:varieties of English
138:No original research
1615:Makes sense to me.
772:WikiProject Science
650:Philosophy articles
334:. According to the
1550:It's an art term?
703:
635:general discussion
528:History of Science
509:history of science
465:History of Science
440:content assessment
355:Article milestones
119:dispute resolution
80:
1354:
1353:
1003:
1002:
978:in most browsers.
956:
955:
952:
951:
922:This article was
890:
889:
886:
885:
829:
828:
825:
824:
821:
820:
720:
719:
716:
715:
712:
711:
617:Philosophy portal
567:
566:
563:
562:
409:
408:
389:
388:
346:
345:
299:
298:
99:Assume good faith
76:
47:
46:
1798:
1649:
1645:
1644:
1634:
1632:
1626:
1622:
1587:
1585:
1579:
1575:
1561:
1544:
1542:
1536:
1532:
1519:
1498:
1496:
1490:
1486:
1477:
1475:
1469:
1465:
1395:
1391:
1389:
1380:
1376:
1375:
1345:
1341:
1331:
1330:
1324:
1311:
1306:
1258:
1253:
1222:
1217:
1176:How minds change
1133:
1128:
1097:
1092:
1025:and how is that
997:Reporting errors
989:has been deleted
965:
964:
958:
946:
945:
942:
939:
936:
919:
912:
911:
901:
894:
854:
847:
838:
837:
831:
797:
796:
795:science articles
793:
790:
787:
766:
761:
760:
750:
743:
742:
737:
729:
722:
688:
678:
652:
651:
648:
645:
642:
619:
614:
613:
612:
603:
596:
595:
590:
587:
576:
569:
539:
538:
535:
532:
529:
498:
493:
492:
491:
482:
475:
474:
469:
461:
454:
437:
428:
427:
420:
419:
411:
398:
375:
352:
348:
315:American English
311:This article is
308:
301:
293:
279:
278:
269:
212:
211:
197:
128:Article policies
49:
23:
16:
1806:
1805:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1686:
1685:
1642:
1640:
1624:
1618:
1616:
1599:Verificationism
1577:
1571:
1569:
1555:
1551:
1534:
1528:
1526:
1513:
1509:
1504:But what about
1488:
1482:
1480:
1479:
1467:
1461:
1459:
1431:Verificationism
1425:. I think that
1419:Verificationism
1407:
1393:
1384:
1382:
1373:
1371:
1343:
1339:
1328:
1322:
1302:
1249:
1213:
1124:
1088:
1066:
1043:
1008:
999:
981:
980:
979:
962:
943:
940:
937:
934:
933:
932:on August 2022.
882:
863:, submitted by
835:
794:
791:
788:
785:
784:
762:
755:
735:
686:
666:High-importance
649:
646:
643:
640:
639:
615:
610:
608:
589:High‑importance
588:
582:
536:
533:
530:
527:
526:
494:
489:
487:
467:
438:on Knowledge's
435:
425:
371:
340:broad consensus
295:
294:
289:
266:
154:
149:
148:
147:
124:
94:
12:
11:
5:
1804:
1802:
1794:
1793:
1788:
1783:
1778:
1773:
1768:
1763:
1758:
1753:
1748:
1743:
1738:
1733:
1728:
1723:
1718:
1713:
1708:
1703:
1698:
1688:
1687:
1684:
1683:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1553:
1511:
1457:
1406:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1352:
1351:
1332:
1321:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1211:on Knowledge.
1200:
1196:
1189:
1187:
1179:
1144:
1141:
1065:
1062:
1042:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1007:
1004:
1001:
1000:
994:
993:
992:
976:case-sensitive
970:
969:
968:
966:
954:
953:
950:
949:
947:
920:
908:
907:
902:
888:
887:
884:
883:
857:
855:
843:
842:
839:
827:
826:
823:
822:
819:
818:
811:Top-importance
807:
801:
800:
798:
781:the discussion
768:
767:
764:Science portal
751:
739:
738:
736:Top‑importance
730:
718:
717:
714:
713:
710:
709:
704:
694:
693:
691:
689:
683:
682:
674:
673:
662:
656:
655:
653:
621:
620:
604:
592:
591:
577:
565:
564:
561:
560:
553:Top-importance
549:
543:
542:
540:
500:
499:
483:
471:
470:
468:Top‑importance
462:
450:
449:
443:
421:
407:
406:
399:
391:
390:
387:
386:
383:
376:
368:
367:
364:
361:
357:
356:
344:
343:
309:
297:
296:
287:
285:
284:
281:
280:
214:
213:
151:
150:
146:
145:
140:
135:
126:
125:
123:
122:
115:
110:
101:
95:
93:
92:
81:
72:
71:
68:
67:
61:
45:
44:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1803:
1792:
1789:
1787:
1784:
1782:
1779:
1777:
1774:
1772:
1769:
1767:
1764:
1762:
1759:
1757:
1754:
1752:
1749:
1747:
1744:
1742:
1739:
1737:
1734:
1732:
1729:
1727:
1724:
1722:
1719:
1717:
1714:
1712:
1709:
1707:
1704:
1702:
1699:
1697:
1694:
1693:
1691:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1633:
1631:
1623:
1621:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1590:
1586:
1584:
1576:
1574:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1560:
1557:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1543:
1541:
1533:
1531:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1518:
1515:
1507:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1495:
1487:
1485:
1476:
1474:
1466:
1464:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1423:this revision
1420:
1416:
1415:this revision
1412:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1390:
1387:
1379:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1349:
1346:parameter to
1337:
1333:
1326:
1325:
1319:
1315:
1312:
1307:
1305:
1299:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1262:
1259:
1254:
1252:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1223:
1218:
1216:
1210:
1206:
1201:
1197:
1194:
1190:
1188:
1185:
1180:
1177:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1134:
1129:
1127:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1098:
1093:
1091:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1069:
1063:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1005:
998:
990:
986:
985:
984:
977:
973:
967:
960:
959:
948:
931:
930:
925:
921:
918:
914:
913:
909:
906:
903:
900:
896:
892:
881:
878:
876:
875:
870:
869:audio version
866:
862:
856:
853:
849:
848:
844:
840:
833:
832:
816:
812:
806:
803:
802:
799:
782:
778:
774:
773:
765:
759:
754:
752:
749:
745:
744:
740:
734:
731:
728:
724:
708:
700:
696:
695:
692:
690:
685:
684:
679:
675:
671:
667:
661:
658:
657:
654:
637:
636:
631:
627:
626:
618:
607:
605:
602:
598:
597:
593:
586:
581:
578:
575:
571:
558:
554:
548:
545:
544:
541:
524:
523:
518:
514:
510:
506:
505:
497:
486:
484:
481:
477:
476:
472:
466:
463:
460:
456:
451:
447:
441:
433:
432:
422:
418:
413:
412:
404:
400:
397:
393:
392:
384:
382:
381:
377:
374:
373:April 8, 2006
370:
369:
365:
362:
359:
358:
353:
349:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
310:
307:
303:
302:
283:
282:
277:
273:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
220:
216:
215:
210:
206:
203:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
160:
157:
156:Find sources:
153:
152:
144:
143:Verifiability
141:
139:
136:
134:
131:
130:
129:
120:
116:
114:
111:
109:
105:
102:
100:
97:
96:
90:
86:
85:Learn to edit
82:
79:
74:
73:
70:
69:
65:
59:
55:
51:
50:
42:
41:
36:
33:) received a
32:
31:final version
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1646:
1629:
1619:
1582:
1572:
1539:
1529:
1493:
1483:
1472:
1462:
1408:
1385:
1377:
1358:Secretary833
1355:
1347:
1336:edit request
1303:
1283:Cambalachero
1279:
1250:
1231:Sock-the-guy
1214:
1192:
1182:
1175:
1162:Sock-the-guy
1148:Sock-the-guy
1125:
1110:Sock-the-guy
1089:
1073:Sock-the-guy
1070:
1067:
1044:
1027:41.80.117.28
1009:
982:
974:Anchors are
971:
927:
891:
879:
873:
858:
810:
770:
665:
633:
623:
552:
520:
513:project page
502:
446:WikiProjects
429:
378:
327:
323:
319:
312:
271:
217:
204:
198:
190:
183:
177:
171:
165:
155:
127:
52:This is the
38:
26:
1454:Testability
1427:Testability
1411:Testability
1106:antiscience
1049:belong to?
924:copy edited
859:There is a
313:written in
181:free images
64:not a forum
35:peer review
1690:Categories
1340:|answered=
641:Philosophy
630:philosophy
580:Philosophy
517:discussion
1651:Fornaeffe
1603:Fornaeffe
1435:Fornaeffe
1245:WP:BEBOLD
867:, for an
434:is rated
121:if needed
104:Be polite
54:talk page
1620:Remsense
1573:Remsense
1530:Remsense
1484:Remsense
1463:Remsense
1304:Remsense
1251:Remsense
1215:Remsense
1126:Remsense
1090:Remsense
385:Reviewed
328:traveled
219:Archives
89:get help
62:This is
60:article.
40:archived
1506:MOS:SOB
861:request
813:on the
786:Science
777:Science
733:Science
668:on the
585:Science
555:on the
436:B-class
363:Process
324:defense
272:60Â days
187:WPÂ refs
175:scholar
58:Science
27:Science
1452:, but
1450:WP:EGG
1298:WP:DUE
442:scale.
366:Result
159:Google
1344:|ans=
1334:This
423:This
320:color
224:Index
202:JSTOR
163:books
117:Seek
1677:talk
1655:talk
1647:Done
1607:talk
1439:talk
1394:talk
1388:ecie
1378:Done
1362:talk
1287:talk
1235:talk
1166:talk
1152:talk
1114:talk
1077:talk
1055:talk
1031:talk
1016:talk
972:Tip:
865:Sdkb
660:High
360:Date
195:FENS
169:news
106:and
1421:in
1413:in
1386:mel
1381:đź’ś
1342:or
1207:or
805:Top
547:Top
209:TWL
1692::
1679:)
1657:)
1625:‥
1609:)
1578:‥
1559:'S
1535:‥
1517:'S
1489:‥
1468:‥
1441:)
1397:-
1364:)
1348:no
1300:.
1289:)
1237:)
1168:)
1154:)
1116:)
1079:)
1057:)
1033:)
1018:)
877:.
687:/
583::
326:,
322:,
270::
264:10
262:,
258:,
254:,
250:,
246:,
242:,
238:,
234:,
230:,
226:,
189:)
87:;
1675:(
1653:(
1630:论
1605:(
1583:论
1556:Z
1554:Z
1540:论
1514:Z
1512:Z
1494:论
1473:论
1437:(
1360:(
1310:诉
1285:(
1257:诉
1233:(
1221:诉
1164:(
1150:(
1132:诉
1112:(
1096:诉
1075:(
1053:(
1029:(
1014:(
991:.
817:.
672:.
559:.
525:.
448:.
342:.
260:9
256:8
252:7
248:6
244:5
240:4
236:3
232:2
228:1
221::
205:·
199:·
191:·
184:·
178:·
172:·
166:·
161:(
91:.
29:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
