Talk:Scottish Gaelic/Archive 6

507:

government department's website itself. This is especially the case when this government department is doing it's own research based on other sources in addition to its own. Therefore, NONE of you have provided a single reason to exclude the information from the Gaelic Affairs website, nor it's use as clearly stating that the Gaelic-speaking community in Nova Scotia is largely Scottish Gaelic speakers, as anyone with even basic knowledge on this subject knows full well. This is based on extensive census data which shows 1/3 of Nova Scotians have ancestors from the Scottish Highlands and Islands, wth an even alrger number from Scotland in general. There has never been a an Irish community in Nova Scotia even close to as large as the Scottish community. This is reflected in census data on ancestry today, as well as those in the past. THe largest ethnic group in "New Scotland" has been the Scots since the early 19th century, with specifically Gaelic-speaking Scots from the Highlands and Islands settling in the Gaelic-speaking communities that exist today. This dialect of "Canadian Gaelic" is a SCOTTISH Gaelic dialect, virtually indistinguishable from certain dialects in Scotland, like in the Western Isles. IT has nothing to do with Irish (Irish Gaelic). The Irish were never a large population component in Nova Scotia, but were a larger presence in Newfoundland. The Irish Gaelic that was once spoken in Canada was

165:, or bothered to read the information on the website with the link I provided, you'd see how most of original settlers in the 18th and 19th centuries were not only from Scotland, but a large portion of which were specifically from the Highlands and Islands, and were Gaelic-speaking. The source specifically mentions how in the early 20th century over 50,000 Nova Scotians were native Gaelic-speakers, while in the mid 19th century it was as high as 80,000. Combined with those speakers in Prince Edward Island and in Ontario, the total number in Canada in the mid-late 19th century was over 100,000. At one time, there was a (defeated) bill tabled in the Canadian parliament in the 1890's to make Gaelic the third official language of Canada (after English and French). I also described your edits as belligerent, not you as a person, so it was not a personal attack. 295:

articles are to be the only sources used. This is the official government office for the Scottish Gaelic (it is Scottish Gaelic, not "Canadian" Gaelic) community in Nova Scotia, and its information IS based on actual scholarly research, including that done by the government. The website is an important source stating that most of speakers are Scottish Gaelic speakers, and very few Irish Gaelic speakers were in Nova Scotia (most were in Newfoundland). That is the point of this reference, as it cites the enormous migration to Nova Scotia from the Highlands and Islands of Scotland, with 1/3 having descent from these Scottish Gaelic-speaking migrants. As for the genealogical information, I will change it to contain the information about the former number of Gaelic-speakers in Nova Scotia.

523:). Finally, the fact this OFFICIAL government office is "deeply connected" to those in the community it represents is irrelevant. Every specific government department is strongly connected to the industries and communities they represent, whether economic sectors, ethnic communities, constituencies, etc. Government officials are democratically elected by the people here in the west, while public servants are hired from our communities, so of course they are connected. Also, the "quality" of academic papers is irrelevant to their simple inclusion, if they are considered a valid, official or peer-reviewed source. Your personal issues, are again, not sufficient for their outright exclusion from being used in this article. 324:

they are L1 speakers; fluent; learned in high school for a year; can say 'hello' and 'goodbye'? What has being of Gaelic decent got to do with language speaking ability? In many cases, statistical census data is not a secondary source-it is primary-and as such is often used incorrectly to make unjustified statements of fact. The source material used is interesting and of use, but I think it would be better used elsewhere, and in a different way, within this article. More generally, this dispute neatly highlights the problem faced by many language articles in WP where editors try, in good faith, to highlight a particular language.

481:. If you drill down into some of these (I have read only a sample) there are citations of academic work. I suggest that the IP editor trawls through all these citations that appear relevant to the main parts of the website, read the cited works, and see which of them include facts that support their intended edits to this article. The next step is to judge the quality of those academic papers (the most obvious test is to see how often they are cited elsewhere). Then a decision can be taken on the accuracy of the information. That would leave ensuring appropriate balance in the article ( 351:

specific time. Like Catriona, you obviously did not read the actual source. I'm getting fed up with this. Your unwillingness to actually investigate included, official, valid sources based on statistical and other data, is not my concern or a relevant reason to override my edits. I already explained further above, if you actually bothered to read, the number of Gaelic-speakers in Nova Scotia in the recent past IS RELEVANT to this article, and thus the number of people who immigrated and who are descended from in the community today is a valid piece of information.

1852:, however the source is referring to all forms of Gaelic, not just Scottish Gaelic. I have a vague and possibly unreliable memory of hearing someone from the Gàidhealtachd (can't remember if they were a speaker or which area they were from), to my surprise, maintaining that their locale employed the "ˈɡeɪlɪk" pronunciation in English but otherwise have only ever heard "ˈɡalɪk" in Scotland. Is this correct and should not the text in this passage reflect only the Scottish pronunciation, referenced appropriately of course? 108:

The source also contains linguistic information about the Scottish Gaelic spoken in Nova Scotia. The genealogical information discusses how common Scottish Gaelic once was in Nova Scotia, with over 50,000 native speakers in the early 20th century in Nova Scotia alone, with one-third of the modern population descending from the originally Gaelic-speaking settlers who came from the Highlands and Islands of Scotland. She apparently didn't bother to read the source before making re-verts in a belligerent manner.

457:

would probably be easier to come to a consensus if we focused on a piece of it at a time. For instance, I think all of us would like to see historical statistics on the number of Gaelic speakers in Canada over time, so long as such statistics are cited to a scholarly source and put in perspective (i.e. L1 vs L2, doubts about survey methods (if applicable), and the distinction between Irish and Scottish Gaelic, which wasn't consistently applied on Canadian censuses).

1909:)) (There are other very favourable reviews of this book, including by Allan Macinnes - the credentials of this as a crucial work are well established.) So it may be right also to mention Devine's subsidiary points about improved communications into the Highlands by steamships, or the existence of English speaking towns, such as Inverness (in 1704), set in a Gaelic-speaking countryside. It would be wrong to ignore Devine's work on the subject - especially as 31: 1644:. If there is still no clear preference or if ambiguity will arise then spell it out: Irish Gaelic, Scottish Gaelic, with each article able to use a regional common use version, eg Irish or Gaelic, but that will be explained in the lead and be in context. The same reasoning should apply to redirects. Without a clear world-wide use preference Gaelic should not redirect to Scottish Gaelic but to a disambig site. 2038:, which is also what Oftedal used in his transcriptions. Even to me (someone whose initial voiceless stops aren't aspirated and still distinguish between voiced and voiceless stops) it sounds pretty much halfway between /g/ and /k/, which is true to initial Gaelic stops overall. That's an allophone level, though, so probably not something we should put in the introduction. 1905:: "Thirdly, the notion that the decline of Gaelic can be explained monocausally by reference to destructive alien forces neglects the important influence, clearly brought out here, of the integration of the Highlands and Highlanders in wider Scottish society."(Scottish Economic & Social History, Volume 15 Issue 1, Page 116-118, ISSN 0269-5030 Available Online Sep 2010 ( 552: 216:"In the early 1900s, as many as 50,000 Nova Scotians spoke Gaelic as their mother tongue...Gaelic language and culture remain distinct parts of Nova Scotia’s identity today. Many Nova Scotians are descendants of Gaelic settlers. The connection to Nova Scotia’s Gaelic heritage continues on. It is shared in traditions, heard in music, and experienced in communities." 491:: "Gaelic Affairs is deeply connected to the community it serves...". I think that acknowledges that those who work for this government initiative are strong advocates of the Gaelic language, which, whilst being commendable, also removes this organisation from being independent commentators on the subject. Hence the need to look at peer-reviewed academic work. 844: 602:

research, including the mere inclusion of Gaelic Affairs under the "External Links" section. I'm not sure where her hostility to Scottish Gaels and Scottish-Canadians comes from. It was myself who started this discussion here to point out her objections as irrelevant, while she never made a single attempt to start discussion.

2099:

Out of interest in not starting an edit war, the line indicating that Scottish Gaelic is "descended" from Middle Irish is blatantly untrue, while the two languages of Irish and Gaelic separated from each other in the Middle Irish period, Irish, Gaelic, and Manx are ultimately descendant of OLD Irish.

1596:

Eh, take it to talk on the page in question, not a personal talk page for starters. My view is, for "Gaelic" to redirect to a general page is accurate, for "Gaelic language" to do so you have to bring a really good case why you want to change something that has been stable a long time. Something that

656:

and demonstrated disregard and distortion of Knowledge policies on consensus, compromise and reliabile sources. (As per WP:NOT, even reliably sourced material can be removed if it is given undue weight or is irrelevant.) I cordially request that the IP editor review the associated Knowledge policies,

160:

relevant as it is based on official and accepted government statistics about those descended from originally Gaelic-speaking settlers from the Highland and Islands of Scotland. It provides information on how prevalent Scottish Gaelic once was on Nova Scotia, just as there is historical information in

1259:

If the material is sourced, why, despite several requests, have you not indicated what the source is? The next reference given in the text is to Broun. Can you clarify if you are claiming that the disputed text is supported by this reference and, if so, can you provide the passage which does? I have

1190:

If you are not making any change then there is no reason to continue this dispute. The content you dispute is clearly sourced. There is nothing bizarre about supported content with sources. Your assertion has been that this sourced content is incorrect. So you you need to show sources to prove this.

1171:

This is surreal. I'm not trying to change anything, as repeatedly mentioned I don't - factually - disagree with anything and I have not made an edit; solely talk page comments about your warring edits and bizarre demands, which fly in the face of policy on verifiability. What on earth do you want me

626:

I was not suggesting your use of multiple IPs was to game 3RR as it is evident to anyone that you are the same user (though signing up for an account would erase any doubt on the matter). That you evidently waited for exactly 24 hours before reverting is what raises the eyebrow. What's more, you did

550:

I'm NOT taking sides here, I feel both the IP editor and those being cautious about unverified claims should all have made more efforts to see if there ARE bona fide sources to back up the 50,000 figure rather than pouring effort into lengthy Talk posts. It took me about 5 minutes on the internet to

456:

before implementing a controversial change. That consensus has not been achieved, since both Roger and I have raised concerns about your edits. I'm requesting that you self-revert until we can come to a consensus as to the proposed changes. The change that you are applying is also very large, and it

350:

Your "wariness" is irrelevant to this discussion, or the factual information from valid sources. An official government body IS an acceptable source according to Knowledge policy. Your questions are irrelevant to a valid, reliable source stating there were 50,000 native speakers (mother tongue) at a

155:

from the Government of Nova Scotia which deals with the affairs of the Gaelic-speaking community in Nova Scotia, especially in Cape Breton, with regards to education, history, language revival, cultural heritage and concerns in general facing the community, including legal ones. There was no need to

123:

As a cultural website intended to promote tourism, I would be hesitant to consider the website as RS for genealogical information of descent. Its statement is also extremely vague, which does not lend me confidence in that regard. 1/3 have some Highland ancestry? 1/3 have entirely Highland ancestry?

1900:

There is no discussion of the view expressed by Tom Devine that much of preferential enthusiasm for learning English came from the Highland Gaelic-speaking population (as opposed to "the Celtic societies in the cities and the professors of Celtic at the Universities") This is closely related to the

768:

In the template itself, it has "States" (prints as "Native to") and "Regions" (prints as "Regions"). States is set to UK and Canada, Regions to Scotland and Nova Scotia. This organization makes sense to me, although I suppose we could change it so "States" is Scotland and Nova Scotia, "Regions" are

601:

My IP sometimes automatically changes, without my control. I did not do this to avoid 3RR. Furthermore, Catriona's re-verts are belligerent and uncompromising. She removed material that I didn't even enter without consensus herself, as well as a valid, official, government source based on extensive

1555:

talking about the Irish language. Ans to your point above, North Americans rarely refer to the Irish language as "the Gaelic language" but they do commonly refer to it as "Gaelic". I understand this may be a misnomer, but the whole point of hatnotes is to redirect confused laypersons, right? There

107:

An editor named Catriona keeps re-verting material that has long been in this article, and further clarifications I've added, because of her personal views on "vagueness". This is irrelevant to inclusion of an accepted, official government source on data of Scottish Gaelic speakers in Nova Scotia.

1502:

Only Scottish Gaelic is commonly referred to as "Gaelic", Irish Gaelic mostly is just called Irish and Manx Gaelic is usually just Manx, so redirecting Gaelic language to Scottish Gaelic is appropriate as it's the primary usage. For the same reason, the hatnote is also appropriate on the Scottish

323:

echoes my concerns. Being published by any form of government body does not necessarily make a source reliable. In this case the remarks are riddled with generalisations that are open to very wide interpretation. '50,000 people can speak Gaelic" is meaningless unless it is qualified. Does it mean

294:

Catriona, an official government source which is based on statistical and other official data IS a reliable source as per Knowledge policy. There is no "some cases" argument. It's a valid source, as are scholarly articles. There is nothing in Knowledge policy that says only peer-reviewed academic

1824:

says : "Irish is regarded as a Celtic language, belonging to the larger family of languages known as Indo-European. Irish belongs to the branch of Insular Celtic known as Goidelic, which comprises Irish-Gaelic, Scottish-Gaelic and Manx." I presume this is what is taught in Irish schools: a clear

1444:

and I have been discussing this. Akerbeltz mentions that "Only Scottish Gaelic is commonly referred to as 'Gaelic' so redirecting Gaelic language to Scottish Gaelic is appropriate as it's the primary usage". I believe Akerbeltz is Scottish, however, in my experience as a North American, speaking

2060:

Yes, that's definitely something for the Gaelic phonology page, not the lead. Especially since there's probably never going to be total agreement on vs - it obviously makes sense from a historic perspective but to be honest, i've always been rather perplexed about the difference in production

1896:

and the provision that compelled the eldest child of Highland landowners to be educated in English. The references for all except the last sentence of the first paragraph are: (1) a paper written in 1954 which therefore substantially predates the surge in the study of Scottish, and particularly

1536:

You will get different answers depending on whether you use "Gaelic" on its own or "the Gaelic language" as a string. If I search for "the Gaelic language" on Google, page 1 has just one result referring to Irish, page 2 and 3 none at all, page 4 has 3, page 5 none (one to Manx). You need to be

1467:

Speaking as an Irishman, Gaelic hasn't been used here to refer to Irish for about a century - the period immediately after independence marked the point when "Irish" became the general English language term for Gaeilge, largely as a political symbol of nationalism. Manx, as mentioned, is solely

940:

Is the change correct? Somebody can speak a language without being literate in it. A problem on wp is that the term 'can speak' is too ambiguous and can apply to a fluent native speaker and to someone who has learned a few sentences from their grandparents (the sort of speakers who might not be

274:

in the article, such as by including an entire paragraph of statistics in the lede, which is supposed to evenly reflect the entire contents of the article. You still haven't made the case that the genealogical statistics are relevant. Also, although the government website could be considered a

635:

indicates that it is you that ought to instigate discussion if your bold edit is reverted, continuing to war again anyway, then being warned for doing so. An assessment of your own behaviour may be worthwhile before handing out accusations of hostility and belligerence. Reverting your latest

506:

None of what was sad here overrides Knowledge policy, which clearly says government and official sources are valid, and allowed to be used in articles. There is nothing in Knowledge citation policy which says that the sources used on the government site have to be used directly, and not the

1229:

You are completely missing my point and are instead attributing opinions and actions to me that I have not expressed or taken. Are you confusing me with the other editor in this thread (and I am making no comment on their actions or opinions)? Have you read what I, alone, am actually

1517:

This may be true in Scotland, but in the U.S., Canada, and perhaps elsewhere, the Irish language is very commonly called "Gaelic", so I think you need to take a more global view on people's misconceptions and common confusions. Even just listening to the first 15 or so YouTube clips

270:. That said, the number of Gaelic speakers over time in Nova Scotia is certainly a relevant piece of information to include, although we should be careful to check the actual census questions to make sure that Irish Gaelic responses are not included, and avoid giving Canadian Gaelic 1374:

Mael Coluim son of Domnall reigned xi. years. With his army he crossed into Moreb and slew Cellach. In the vii year of his reign he plundered the English as far as the river Thesis and carried off many people and many droves of cattle, which raid the Scotti call the raid of

156:

remove the paragraph in the article introduction, which this source provides further clarification on with regards to how the Gaelic-speaking community in Nova Scotia ("New Scotland") are speakers of specifically Scottish Gaelic. As for genealogical information, it

1065:

The etymology of the word "Alba" is not under dispute. What the passage is saying is that it's historical usage is unclear from that point in time. You claim that this is inarticulate, so you need to show evidence to prove this, relative to that period in time.

807:

removed inclusion in the lead sentence of the alternative term "Scots Gaelic" based on the rationale that it is 'never referred to as "Scots Gaelic"'. On the contrary: A Google Books search turns up plenty of instances of this phrase, even in titles. Examples:

185:

Furthermore, why did you remove the office of Gaelic affairs in Nova Scotia from the list of external links? This was completely uncalled for. Do you have some bias against Scottish Gaels in Nova Scotia or something? That link will be restored to this article.

1767:

I disagree "Gaelic" is not a language, it is a language group. Extant Gaelic languages include Irish, Manx, and Scottish Gaelic. The argument of "common usage" is invalid. Encyclopedic material needs to be accurate, not a slave to popular misconception.

511:. Irish immigration to Canada was historically always very small compared to the enormous Scottish immigration to Canada (most of Canada's Prime Ministers and Fathers of Confederation, for example, have either been from Scotland or of Scottish descent - 2100:

Irish migrants to Scotland and Man were speaking Old Irish at the time of their migration, having the article read Middle Irish is blatantly untrue and confusing. As a professional in the field of Celtic Studies, this is the accepted understanding.

1784:

Based on my own personal experience, the idea that Irish people don't call Irish 'Gaelic' might be a bit of wishful thinking of educated, politicized middle classes. Along the same lines as the claim that Irish people don't call soccer 'football'.

784:

Thanks for that. Personally, I am happy to sit on the fence on this one. What I do see is another example of ambiguity caused by the use of terms that are open to different interpretations depending on the situation, eg: state, nation, country.

1561: 161:

the article about widespread prevalence of the language in Scotland in the past. In any case, your personal views on this are irrelevant to an official government source based on solid genealogical and statistical data. If you knew about the

828: 128:

to an article about language, especially since we already have statistics about the past and present speaking of the Gaelic language in Nova Scotia. Last, I would be wary of the "belligerent" language, which seems to fall foul of the

1683:

Where is your evidence to back those claims? A unreliable , but useful to an extent, check is to google Scotish gaelic (13.9m) and Irish Gaelic (6.3m.) That hardly makes 'Irish gaelic' rarely used. Never believe wikipedia, but the

2144:

Frankly the previous version of the article was also unsourced - I've attempted to be diplomatic by further correcting the article to indicate the language is descended from Old Irish but branched in the Middle Irish period.

1088:

Whatever the merits or otherwise of this particular text, the onus is on those advocating it to source it, not on those disputing it to disprove it. Rectify that and it'll be half the battle. This is fundamental stuff; check

1335:

Yes, unsourced material needs to be removed. But the material he is attempting to remove is well sourced. So he needs to provide a basis for its removal, a source. He has consistently refused to offer any such thing.

583:. A reversion to re-insert a contested edit, without having reached consensus, precisely 24 hours and 4 minutes after its removal does not indicate a willingness to resolve this issue in a co-operative manner. 1032:

in ancient Greco-Latin sources); only later did it become restricted to northern Britain - i.e., what was to become Scotland, in Late Old Irish. It was never the "name for the Picts" (but it had a derivative,

895:

My reversion of your edit was entirely accidental, presumably by a clumsy mouse click, so no comment on the edit. I don't know what the source says. You may not have noticed but I immediately self-reverted.

1702:

A more useful comparison would be search results for "Gaelic language", the term under discussion. I did a Google books search. Of the first ten results, only one refers to Irish and it's from 1808.

1350:

You keep saying it's "well sourced". What do you mean by that? What source are you referring to? The content being removed itself contains no source nor is it immediately or closely followed by one.

2188: 419: 352: 296: 1897:

Highland history that has occurred since then; and (2) a book written by someone who is neither a historian nor a linguist - so one wonders if there is a better, more authoritative source to use.

1468:

referred to as such, and while Gaelic is sometimes used for the Celtic language of Scotland, it's generally described in both languages of Ireland as Scottish Gaelic (Gaeilge na hAlban in Irish).

1640:

This should be viewed globally, not locally, so what is said in one place in the world is not relevant. Look at what reliable sources say. If there is a clear preference follow that. If not, use

279:

in some cases, it's best to cite scholarly sources that were written by an expert. I find it difficult to believe that there has been nothing published on the speakers of Gaelic in Nova Scotia.

997:

has me puzzled. If someone removes material because they dispute it and it is unsourced, the onus is fundamentally not on them to somehow provide sources to disprove the unsupported assertion.

579:

I also am not taking sides here. As the IP editor is editing from a variety of IP addresses and it is unclear if they would receive any messages on any of the user talk pages I will note here:

473:"This is the official government office for the Scottish Gaelic ... community in Nova Scotia, and its information IS based on actual scholarly research, including that done by the government." 227:"Estimates from the community indicate that there are approximately 2000 speakers of Gaelic in Nova Scotia today. Gaelic continues to be a strong part of the cultural fabric of the province. 1307:

makes no sense. That reversion re-introduced an unsourced assertion and doesn't at all jibe with the edit summary you left. I agree with Matt, this is perplexing and approaching surreal.--

1176:

isn't sourced, or at best the sourcing is unclear. Stop warring and either indicate the source for the contested text or revert yourself and remove it, unless and until it is supported.

1557: 2174:

Robert the Bruce called northern Ireland Scotia Major, so NO, Scottish Gaelic did not come from old Irish as there is no such thing as old Irish, simply Gaelic or Scottish Gaelic.

1317:

I agree with WilliamThweatt. Mediatech, you don't need a source to justify removing unsourced material. If you want to restore what has turned out to be a controversial inclusion,

836: 821: 813: 1855:

A quick web search has turned up support for this distinction for the Scottish pronunciation but I'm not sure that they are sufficiently authoritative and one is commercial:

2165:

So, Gaelic was brought from Scotia to Pictland by the Scotti people, this is the accuracy wiki should retain as this is what it says in our museums and on the wiki itself.

266:

and stop making baseless accusations that I'm biased against Canadian Gaelic or that I haven't examined your sources. You also seem to have a creative perspective on the

2192: 423: 356: 300: 681:

The words "this has not been mentioned in your ridiculous contentions, so do not remove this in any future re-verts" appear under user 174.119.80.219's edit commentary

684:. This edit commentary is unacceptable. Editors are free to remove this material if it is not suitable for the article. Elsewhere the words "WP policy is on my side" 1522:, you'll find Gaelic mostly referring to Irish culture and somewhat often the Irish language itself (including by one obvious Ulster speaker in clip #16). Thanks. 2016:

It's correct. Remember /k/ is not the same as in English /kʰæt/, it doesn't have the aspiration, which makes it sound like /g/ to native speakers of English.

1822: 1803:

As a native, I've never heard any Irish person refer to the language as 'Gaelic'- regardless of class, it's universally referred to simply as 'Irish'.

1141:

The section you are trying to change is already well sourced. The fact that you disagree with it is irrelevant to this fact. Source your edit please.

627:

so without attaining consensus on the matter; something which abundantly remains to be reached. Yes, you started the discussion here but only after

710:

Fold "Official Recognition", "Education", "Literature" and "Church" into one top-level heading: "Usage". Linguists will be familiar with the term "

2162:

I agree, the name Ireland did not exist until the 19th century was it, before that the people we're called Scotti in Latin or Scots in Saxon.

1453:, which covers both Irish and Scottish Gaelic. Akerbeltz disagrees; you can see our discussion at their talk page. Anyone else have thoughts? 1972: 1611:

The hatnote on Scottish Gaelic, imho, does a great job at redirecting the confused reader to other articles which they might be looking for.

636:

re-insertion of the contested text, pending a genuine establishment of consensus, would be a good start in establishing your own good faith.

2177:

Knowledge truly needs editors that align the wiki pages so they make sense as the majority look like personal opinions rather than factual.

603: 524: 187: 166: 109: 1658:

The use of "Gaelic language" for Irish is not correct, or particularly common, anywhere in the world. That's why it should redirect here.

1748:. I agree that this refers only to Scottish Gaelic. The language in Ireland is called "Irish" or "Irish Gaelic", but as Buidhe shows, 1565: 1873:, starting "The orig. Gael. pronunciation..." maybe indicates that both pronunciations be listed here but with an appropriate note. 687:

appear in the edit commentary. It says you should obtain consensus, and not make disruptive reverts. References should be on topic.

1870: 516: 249: 717:

Promote "Media" to an independent subsection of "Usage". The usage in the media is as least as significant as usage in churches.

1856: 1929:

I have now rewritten this section, trying to provide a balanced view of the causes of the replacement of Gaelic with English.

1791: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 706:

Personally, I think this article still suffers from too many top-level sections. Unless there are objections, I propose to:

1058: 267: 134: 2130: 1913:

is on the reading list of every university course that covers Highland social or economic history in any sort of detail.

1714: 1670: 1623: 558: 151:

I already explained to you that it is not simply a "cultural website", whatever you mean by that term, but it is an

1935: 1919: 1831: 497: 38: 1901:

need for Highlanders to work outside the Gaelic speaking areas. As Ewen Cameron puts it in his review of Devine's

1786: 1998: 1993: 1384:

It's been proposed that this is an indication of the Picts' name for themselves. It's discussed by Alex Woolf:

653: 628: 607: 528: 253: 191: 170: 113: 1569: 1693: 1649: 946: 790: 758: 652:

Personally, I am finding it increasingly difficult to assume good faith of the IP editor, in light of their

329: 2035: 1773: 1573: 1341: 1279: 1196: 1146: 1071: 967:

I failed to find the fact in question in the link to the source. Establishing that would be a good start.

711: 271: 162: 1037:, meaning "inhabitants of Alba" that became the word for the Scottish people after the semantic shift of 316: 1931: 1915: 1878: 1827: 1414: 1265: 1181: 1098: 1002: 972: 901: 641: 588: 493: 2171:

Ireland was called Scotland (Scotia), the wiki states this and there is evidence, so no not old Irish.

2118:) . Is there a published source which supports your change? If so, it should be added to the article. 774: 732: 662: 475:

is correct, then it should be possible to cite the scholarly research used to put together the website.

462: 284: 142: 2184: 1355: 1326: 1046: 858: 838:

The Other Tongues: An Introduction to Writing in Irish, Scots Gaelic and Scots in Ulster and Scotland

804: 692: 47: 17: 1892:

The Modern era section under History seems to have a number of problems. There is no mention of the

478:

I have taken a look at the Gaelic affairs website. It includes a section titled research and reports

2066: 2021: 1808: 1602: 1542: 1508: 1473: 1308: 1012:

The editor who keeps re-inserting this nonsense statement clearly has no knowledge of the subject.

931: 882: 747: 569: 453: 1761: 1689: 1685: 1645: 1496: 1450: 942: 786: 754: 508: 325: 206:

Since you do not bother to read the actual source, I will quote the specific information for you:

125: 1860: 1389: 2150: 2105: 1969: 1769: 1581: 1527: 1492: 1458: 1337: 1275: 1192: 1142: 1067: 1054: 917: 512: 1821:

I don't know what value you put on it, but an official Republic of Ireland education website

471:

In an attempt to add something to the discussion, if the statement on this talkpage (above):

2125: 2085: 2043: 2006: 1893: 1874: 1857:

https://www.nztcinternational.com/blog/irish-gaelic-and-scottish-gaelic-what-are-differences

1757: 1709: 1665: 1641: 1618: 1409: 1261: 1177: 1094: 1024:

word for Britain (and it comes directly from the earliest attested Celtic name for Britain,

998: 968: 897: 770: 728: 658: 637: 584: 458: 320: 280: 138: 1752:

is virtually never used to refer to Irish (nor to Manx) but frequently to Scottish Gaelic.

1744:" already redirects to disambig page, just as it should. Here, we are exclusive discussing 2114:

While your expertise is appreciated, on Knowledge we try to have sources for information (

1745: 1437: 1351: 1322: 854: 688: 555: 1445:

Gaelic is often used (and maybe it's just among us North Americans) to mean speaking the

2062: 2017: 1804: 1733: 1598: 1538: 1504: 1469: 1446: 1441: 927: 874: 565: 2196: 2154: 2136: 2109: 2089: 2070: 2047: 2025: 2010: 1939: 1923: 1882: 1835: 1812: 1796: 1777: 1720: 1697: 1676: 1653: 1632: 1606: 1585: 1546: 1531: 1512: 1477: 1462: 1426: 1359: 1345: 1330: 1311: 1283: 1269: 1200: 1185: 1150: 1102: 1075: 1006: 976: 950: 935: 921: 905: 887: 862: 794: 778: 762: 736: 696: 666: 645: 611: 592: 573: 551:

discover that the 50,000 figure is an estimate calculated by Jonathan Dembling (2006)

532: 501: 466: 427: 360: 333: 304: 288: 257: 195: 174: 146: 117: 751:

In what countries/regions the language is spoken, and how many people speak it there.

632: 520: 482: 449: 263: 130: 2146: 2101: 1577: 1523: 1488: 1454: 1050: 913: 276: 124:

We should be specific in an encyclopedia. Facts about genealogy are unlikely to be

564:

which I know as a bona fide publication, then the figure ought to be trustworthy.

2120: 2115: 2081: 2039: 2002: 1753: 1737: 1704: 1660: 1613: 1449:. Therefore, I feel that maybe "Gaelic language" might do better redirecting to 1090: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

993:

I have no knowledge on the matters of fact and take no side in that regard but

229:

There are approximately 230,000 people who are descendants of Gaelic settlers."

1966:

Clanship to Crofters' War: The social transformation of the Scottish Highlands

1906: 872:

As far as I know, literate means reading, fluent means speaking. Any comment?

657:

especially regarding respecting consensus rather than continuing an edit war.

1551:

That's why I gave you audio-in-context to listen to; some of those speakers

1021: 397:"In the early 1900s, as many as 50,000 Nova Scotians spoke Gaelic as their 1369:

This probably comes from a passage in the Chronicle of the Kings of Alba:

1519: 240: 1866: 557:. The full text (I haven't got time to go through it just now) is here 479: 1741: 1029: 489: 103:

Inclusion of information from Gaelic Affairs office for Nova Scotia

2168:

The reason nobody believes wiki is because it contradicts itself.

1848:

On the basis that it is supported by the source given, I support

1260:

not warned you for warring, yet but my patience is wearing thin.

2181:

Scottish Gaelic is the modern form of Primitive Scotti Gaelic.

1688:

site puts a lot of what's in this discussion in useful context.

830:

6000+ Vocabulary: English – Scots Gaelic, Scots Gaelic – English

1274:

You have only to look at the provided source. Have a nice say.

1172:

to source? How can you source the removal of something because

1321:

provide a source, rather than just asserting that one exists.

379:

Since Roger failed to actually read the source, or my content:

25: 1861:

https://cuhwc.org.uk/page/unofficial-guide-pronouncing-gaelic

823:

Webster's Scots Gaelic to English Crossword Puzzles: Level 2

1556:

are plenty of sources to confirm this lay use of "Gaelic":

1487:

Hi. Please let me know what you didn't like about my edit.

753:

No mention of sovereign state. What to do? Scotland or UK?

488:

One note of caution about the Gaelic Affairs site - it says

1825:

equivalence between "Irish-Gaelic" and "Scottish-Gaelic".

1124: 1849: 1304: 994: 721: 685: 682: 580: 1537:

careful about how you configure your search strings.

1959: 1957: 868:Literate means reading, fluent means speaking 8: 1396:, vol. 2, Edinburgh University Press, p. 179 1907:https://doi.org/10.3366/sesh.1995.15.15.116 815:Scots Gaelic: An Introduction to the Basics 2182: 1044: 562:Edinburgh Companion to the Gaelic Language 2061:between a devoiced and a voiceless stop. 1968:(2013 ed.). Manchester University Press. 2189:2A00:23C5:1F17:9600:40C4:540D:270D:D572 1953: 1117: 853:I've restored the term to the article. 560:but the my mind, if it's data cited in 420:2607:FEA8:1C5F:ECA3:1945:A173:E289:CDE0 353:2607:FEA8:1C5F:ECA3:1945:A173:E289:CDE0 297:2607:FEA8:1C5F:ECA3:1945:A173:E289:CDE0 746:See today's edits: The template guide 724:into Official Recognition and/or Media 714:", but that's technical in my opinion. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1997: 1992: 1394:The New Edinburgh History of Scotland 769:the Hebrides and Cape Breton Island. 7: 849:, part 3, "A Scots Gaelic Thesaurus" 720:Put some of the material deleted in 2001:to me. Is this definitely right? 1991:The sound clip really sounds like 1597:is specific to "Gaelic language". 1390:"From Pictland to Alba 789 - 1070" 24: 315:I viewed the recent additions by 1483:Copied from Akerbeltz' talk page 517:Alexander Mackenzie (politician) 29: 1436:"Gaelic language" redirects to 989:Dispute over unsourced material 654:history of disruptive behaviour 241:Our Community - Gaelic Affairs 153:official government department 1: 2197:21:11, 26 December 2019 (UTC) 2155:20:43, 15 December 2019 (UTC) 2137:20:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC) 2110:20:32, 15 December 2019 (UTC) 2034:If we're super precise, it's 977:11:43, 11 November 2018 (UTC) 951:11:27, 11 November 2018 (UTC) 936:10:58, 11 November 2018 (UTC) 922:10:56, 11 November 2018 (UTC) 906:10:59, 11 November 2018 (UTC) 888:10:52, 11 November 2018 (UTC) 1996:rather than the transcribed 1836:19:18, 19 January 2019 (UTC) 1813:22:02, 19 January 2019 (UTC) 1797:15:00, 19 January 2019 (UTC) 1778:15:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC) 1762:13:37, 19 January 2019 (UTC) 1721:11:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC) 1698:11:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC) 1677:09:53, 19 January 2019 (UTC) 1654:00:15, 19 January 2019 (UTC) 1633:16:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC) 1607:16:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC) 1586:15:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC) 1547:12:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC) 1532:00:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC) 1513:22:44, 13 January 2019 (UTC) 1497:17:14, 13 January 2019 (UTC) 1478:22:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 1463:14:14, 15 January 2019 (UTC) 1427:16:38, 5 December 2018 (UTC) 1360:00:22, 5 December 2018 (UTC) 1346:22:02, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 1331:21:04, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 1312:20:46, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 1284:20:03, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 1270:17:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 1201:16:42, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 1186:16:33, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 1151:15:14, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 1103:10:44, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 1076:03:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 1007:00:03, 4 December 2018 (UTC) 863:16:41, 12 October 2018 (UTC) 452:guideline, you need to find 1888:History: Modern era section 1865:The passage at the head of 1740:. Let's keep in mind that " 941:literate in that language) 2213: 2026:23:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC) 2011:20:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC) 1940:13:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 1924:20:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC) 795:22:56, 6 August 2018 (UTC) 779:21:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC) 763:21:36, 6 August 2018 (UTC) 737:18:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 268:no personal attacks policy 2090:21:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC) 2071:09:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC) 2048:00:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC) 1911:Clanship to Crofters' War 1903:Clanship to Crofters' War 1883:11:57, 8 March 2019 (UTC) 697:23:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 667:00:34, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 646:09:51, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 612:23:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC) 593:10:05, 15 July 2018 (UTC) 574:09:49, 15 July 2018 (UTC) 554:based on old census data 533:23:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC) 502:22:51, 14 July 2018 (UTC) 467:17:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC) 428:16:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC) 361:16:35, 14 July 2018 (UTC) 334:23:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC) 305:16:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC) 289:19:10, 13 July 2018 (UTC) 258:17:08, 13 July 2018 (UTC) 196:17:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC) 175:17:00, 13 July 2018 (UTC) 147:16:47, 13 July 2018 (UTC) 118:16:36, 13 July 2018 (UTC) 1482: 1028:, which was rendered as 319:with some wariness, and 1987:Sound clip at the start 1844:Nomenclature in English 926:Yes, your point being? 835:Agee and Cheape, 2013, 1125:http://www.dil.ie/2890 1042:Northern Britain : --> 677:Unseemly edit comments 163:History of Nova Scotia 42:of past discussions. 1964:Devine, T M (1994). 1787:Deacon of Pndapetzim 1388:Woolf, Alex (2007), 805:User:EosaphOScollain 18:Talk:Scottish Gaelic 1630:(formerly Catrìona) 742:Infobox - Native to 519:, even NDP founder 262:I suggest that you 135:no personal attacks 1686:Goidelic languages 1451:Goidelic languages 1379:that is nainndisi. 581:do not game WP:3RR 509:Newfoundland Irish 2199: 2187:comment added by 1974:978-0-7190-9076-9 1794: 1631: 1423: 1062: 1049:comment added by 995:this edit summary 513:John A. MacDonald 264:assume good faith 131:assume good faith 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2204: 2135: 2095:Old/Middle Irish 2037: 2000: 1995: 1979: 1978: 1961: 1932:ThoughtIdRetired 1916:ThoughtIdRetired 1894:Statutes of Iona 1828:ThoughtIdRetired 1790: 1719: 1675: 1629: 1628: 1422: 1421:and the soapdish 1419: 1417: 1412: 1404: 1403: 1401: 1127: 1122: 1016:(more properly, 886: 879: 846:Gaelic for Today 494:ThoughtIdRetired 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2212: 2211: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2119: 2097: 1989: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1975: 1963: 1962: 1955: 1890: 1846: 1750:Gaelic language 1746:Gaelic language 1703: 1659: 1612: 1485: 1438:Scottish Gaelic 1434: 1432:Gaelic language 1420: 1415: 1410: 1399: 1397: 1387: 1309:William Thweatt 1132: 1131: 1130: 1123: 1119: 1041:= Britain : --> 991: 875: 873: 870: 802: 744: 704: 679: 277:reliable source 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2210: 2208: 2180: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2096: 2093: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2029: 2028: 1988: 1985: 1981: 1980: 1973: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1945: 1943: 1942: 1930: 1914: 1889: 1886: 1850:this reversion 1845: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1826: 1816: 1815: 1800: 1799: 1781: 1780: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1484: 1481: 1447:Irish language 1433: 1430: 1382: 1381: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1129: 1128: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 990: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 910: 909: 908: 869: 866: 851: 850: 841: 833: 826: 818: 812:Argyll, 2001, 801: 800:"Scots Gaelic" 798: 782: 781: 743: 740: 726: 725: 718: 715: 703: 702:Reorganization 700: 678: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 650: 649: 648: 629:being informed 617: 616: 615: 614: 604:174.119.80.219 596: 595: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 525:174.119.80.219 492: 486: 476: 474: 472: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 363: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 317:174.119.80.219 308: 307: 250:174.119.80.219 246: 245: 244: 243: 235: 234: 233: 232: 221: 220: 219: 218: 210: 209: 208: 207: 201: 200: 199: 198: 188:174.119.80.219 180: 179: 178: 177: 167:174.119.80.219 110:174.119.80.219 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2209: 2200: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2178: 2175: 2172: 2169: 2166: 2163: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2134: 2133: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2123: 2117: 2116:Verifiability 2112: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2094: 2092: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2080:OK, thanks. 2072: 2068: 2064: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2004: 1999: 1994: 1986: 1976: 1971: 1967: 1960: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1898: 1895: 1887: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1863: 1862: 1858: 1853: 1851: 1843: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1823: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1798: 1793: 1788: 1783: 1782: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1732:I agree with 1722: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1707: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1690:Roger 8 Roger 1687: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1664: 1663: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1646:Roger 8 Roger 1643: 1639: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1621: 1617: 1616: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1595: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1554: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1503:Gaelic page. 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1480: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1443: 1439: 1431: 1429: 1428: 1425: 1424: 1418: 1413: 1405: 1395: 1391: 1385: 1380: 1378: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1310: 1306: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1126: 1121: 1118: 1114: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1093:if required. 1092: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1064: 1063: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1040: 1036: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 988: 978: 974: 970: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 952: 948: 944: 943:Roger 8 Roger 939: 938: 937: 933: 929: 925: 924: 923: 919: 915: 911: 907: 903: 899: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 884: 880: 878: 867: 865: 864: 860: 856: 848: 847: 843:McKay, 2007, 842: 840: 839: 834: 832: 831: 827: 825: 824: 819: 817: 816: 811: 810: 809: 806: 799: 797: 796: 792: 788: 787:Roger 8 Roger 780: 776: 772: 767: 766: 765: 764: 760: 756: 755:Roger 8 Roger 752: 748: 741: 739: 738: 734: 730: 723: 719: 716: 713: 709: 708: 707: 701: 699: 698: 694: 690: 686: 683: 676: 668: 664: 660: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 634: 630: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 613: 609: 605: 600: 599: 598: 597: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 577: 576: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 556: 553: 534: 530: 526: 522: 521:Tommy Douglas 518: 514: 510: 505: 504: 503: 499: 495: 490: 487: 484: 480: 477: 470: 469: 468: 464: 460: 455: 451: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 429: 425: 421: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 402: 400: 399:mother tongue 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 362: 358: 354: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 335: 331: 327: 326:Roger 8 Roger 322: 318: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 306: 302: 298: 293: 292: 291: 290: 286: 282: 278: 273: 269: 265: 260: 259: 255: 251: 242: 239: 238: 237: 236: 231: 230: 225: 224: 223: 222: 217: 214: 213: 212: 211: 205: 204: 203: 202: 197: 193: 189: 184: 183: 182: 181: 176: 172: 168: 164: 159: 154: 150: 149: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 127: 122: 121: 120: 119: 115: 111: 102: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2183:— Preceding 2179: 2176: 2173: 2170: 2167: 2164: 2161: 2131: 2126: 2121: 2113: 2098: 2079: 1990: 1965: 1948: 1944: 1910: 1902: 1899: 1891: 1864: 1854: 1847: 1770:Mediatech492 1749: 1731: 1715: 1710: 1705: 1671: 1666: 1661: 1637: 1624: 1619: 1614: 1552: 1486: 1466: 1435: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1398:, retrieved 1393: 1386: 1383: 1376: 1373: 1368: 1338:Mediatech492 1318: 1303:@Mediatech, 1302: 1276:Mediatech492 1193:Mediatech492 1173: 1143:Mediatech492 1120: 1112: 1068:Mediatech492 1045:— Preceding 1038: 1034: 1025: 1017: 1013: 992: 912:I agree. -- 876: 871: 852: 845: 837: 829: 822: 814: 803: 783: 750: 745: 727: 705: 680: 561: 549: 398: 396: 272:undue weight 261: 247: 228: 226: 215: 157: 152: 106: 78: 43: 37: 1875:Mutt Lunker 1262:Mutt Lunker 1178:Mutt Lunker 1095:Mutt Lunker 999:Mutt Lunker 969:Mutt Lunker 898:Mutt Lunker 638:Mutt Lunker 585:Mutt Lunker 448:As per the 36:This is an 1949:References 1867:this entry 1400:5 December 1352:Largoplazo 1323:Largoplazo 1113:References 1043:Scotland. 1020:) was the 855:Largoplazo 689:Travelmite 137:policies. 2063:Akerbeltz 2018:Akerbeltz 1805:Culloty82 1734:Akerbeltz 1642:weighting 1599:Akerbeltz 1539:Akerbeltz 1505:Akerbeltz 1470:Culloty82 1442:Akerbeltz 1022:Old Irish 928:Akerbeltz 883:reasoning 877:Abductive 722:this edit 566:Akerbeltz 454:consensus 95:Archive 9 90:Archive 8 85:Archive 7 79:Archive 6 73:Archive 5 68:Archive 4 60:Archive 1 2185:unsigned 1377:Albidosi 1059:contribs 1047:unsigned 1035:Albanach 771:Catrìona 729:Catrìona 659:Catrìona 459:Catrìona 321:Catrìona 281:Catrìona 139:Catrìona 126:relevant 2147:Ladysif 2102:Ladysif 1869:at the 1638:Comment 1578:Wolfdog 1524:Wolfdog 1489:Wolfdog 1455:Wolfdog 1411:Catfish 1230:saying? 1051:Cagwinn 914:Womtelo 712:domains 39:archive 2082:Epa101 2040:Jeppiz 2003:Epa101 1754:Jeppiz 1742:Gaelic 1738:Buidhe 1030:Albion 1026:Albiiū 820:2007, 749:says: 633:WP:BRD 483:WP:DUE 450:WP:BRD 631:that 248:174. 16:< 2193:talk 2151:talk 2127:uidh 2106:talk 2086:talk 2067:talk 2044:talk 2036:/ɡ̊/ 2022:talk 2007:talk 1970:ISBN 1936:talk 1920:talk 1879:talk 1832:talk 1809:talk 1792:Talk 1774:talk 1758:talk 1736:and 1711:uidh 1694:talk 1667:uidh 1650:talk 1603:talk 1582:talk 1543:talk 1528:talk 1520:here 1509:talk 1493:talk 1474:talk 1459:talk 1402:2018 1356:talk 1342:talk 1327:talk 1305:this 1280:talk 1266:talk 1197:talk 1182:talk 1147:talk 1099:talk 1091:WP:V 1072:talk 1055:talk 1039:Albu 1018:Albu 1014:Alba 1003:talk 973:talk 947:talk 932:talk 918:talk 902:talk 859:talk 791:talk 775:talk 759:talk 733:talk 693:talk 663:talk 642:talk 608:talk 589:talk 570:talk 529:talk 498:talk 463:talk 424:talk 357:talk 330:talk 301:talk 285:talk 254:talk 192:talk 171:talk 143:talk 133:and 114:talk 1871:DSL 1625:dhe 1564:, 1553:are 1416:Jim 1319:you 2195:) 2153:) 2108:) 2088:) 2069:) 2046:) 2024:) 2009:) 1956:^ 1938:) 1922:) 1881:) 1859:, 1834:) 1811:) 1795:) 1776:) 1760:) 1696:) 1652:) 1620:ui 1605:) 1584:) 1576:. 1572:, 1568:, 1560:, 1545:) 1530:) 1511:) 1495:) 1476:) 1461:) 1440:. 1392:, 1358:) 1344:) 1329:) 1282:) 1268:) 1199:) 1184:) 1174:it 1149:) 1101:) 1074:) 1061:) 1057:• 1005:) 975:) 949:) 934:) 920:) 904:) 861:) 793:) 777:) 761:) 735:) 695:) 665:) 644:) 610:) 591:) 572:) 531:) 515:, 500:) 485:). 465:) 426:) 401:." 359:) 332:) 303:) 287:) 256:) 194:) 173:) 158:is 145:) 116:) 64:← 2191:( 2149:( 2132:e 2122:b 2104:( 2084:( 2065:( 2042:( 2020:( 2005:( 1977:. 1934:( 1918:( 1877:( 1830:( 1807:( 1789:( 1772:( 1756:( 1716:e 1706:b 1692:( 1672:e 1662:b 1648:( 1615:b 1601:( 1580:( 1574:5 1570:4 1566:3 1562:2 1558:1 1541:( 1526:( 1507:( 1491:( 1472:( 1457:( 1354:( 1340:( 1325:( 1278:( 1264:( 1195:( 1180:( 1145:( 1097:( 1070:( 1053:( 1001:( 971:( 945:( 930:( 916:( 900:( 885:) 881:( 857:( 789:( 773:( 757:( 731:( 691:( 661:( 640:( 606:( 587:( 568:( 527:( 496:( 461:( 422:( 355:( 328:( 299:( 283:( 252:( 190:( 169:( 141:( 112:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index