71:
53:
22:
155:
81:
376:
Isn't the "opposite" (the word the article uses) of being self-critical being arrogant and irrationally self-assured, not just having "a coherent, comprehensive, and generally positive self-identity"? Sometimes you really are the problem and you need to change your behavior. "Self-criticism", a term
197:
Some political or religious cults also promote "self-criticism sessions" but these are more in the nature of a (possibly guilt-laden) "confession" or forced acknowledgment that one has made a mistake. However, if the self-criticism is "artificial" or forced, it is less likely to lead to correcting
397:
of irrational self-criticism. Lucky for us, most humanities majors would find such an idea way too anti-social to entertain it. But if it turns out that someone has entertained this idea before, then we would be forced to write an actual article. And that would be terribly annoying. We'd probably
299:
This should unquestionably have its own page. Framing an integral part of a political ideology espoused by hundreds of millions of people as akin to mental illness is insulting. Moreover, the sly introduction of a huge blurb about the CIA-run Khmer Rouge is pejorative on its face. Pol Pot was
261:
The section on communism in this page seems out of place, and contains almost entirely unsourced claims. Self-criticism may be a part of communist ideology but debating communist history is something that belongs on a different page. It should be either re-worked entirely or removed.
203:
If one is incapable of criticizing oneself at all, this can lead to a false sense of confidence. But if one is too self-critical, this may be mentally or emotionally paralysing, and destroy the confidence or certainty necessary to take the actions that will correct previous
392:
No, the term is also commonly used to refer to critical thinking. I shall expand the hatnote. Does critical thinking fully cover this topic? I don't think so. Worst case scenario, someone with a degree might write a book advocating
241:
This article could be improved by having more sources that are cited and cited sources that were used but not cited. It could also be improved by taking a more neutral stance than only having a one sided perspective.
192:
I know the current article is a stub but even with that in mind most of what is there is mostly opinion, of little worth, poorly phrased, unreferenced, and does
Knowledge no favours. I am deleting the following:
377:
which just as readily evokes rational, constructive self-evaluation, seems like a misnomer for something that is defined as pathological, maladaptive, and irrational. Is this really the only usage of the term?
403:
Furthermore, readers who are expecting to read about positive self-criticism probably aren't going to be satisfied by the critical thinking article. So really, my partial solution is actually no solution
361:
437:
127:
133:
356:
442:
432:
171:
103:
218:
Agreed. In fact the whole introductory paragraph should be deleted or thoroughly rewritten. I can not do the latter, not being an academic.
301:
183:
94:
58:
355:" («រៀនសុទ្ធ») literally means "pure learning" or "pure education". Can someone who has access to the source verify? —
33:
247:
278:
277:
This section is describing a real phenomenon, but I agree it should probably be in a separate article. Perhaps
21:
305:
209:
39:
382:
243:
267:
226:
186:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
102:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
290:
413:
336:
86:
282:
378:
340:
263:
222:
221:
Surely "self-criticism" and "self-knowledge" are cognate in meaning, if not in origin.
426:
286:
409:
339:
recalls observing the Khmer Rouge engaging in frequent self-criticism to reinforce
324:
70:
52:
99:
76:
344:
417:
386:
366:
309:
294:
271:
251:
230:
212:
285:(which seems to be a Chinese variant of basically the same thing).
149:
15:
198:
one's own mistakes, or to learning what ought to be learnt.
179:
175:
166:
161:
398:
have to create the world's worst disambiguation page.
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
132:This article has not yet received a rating on the
331:, meaning "religious education". In his memoir
8:
19:
153:
47:
327:, self-criticism sessions were known as
208:and making some minor literary changes.
160:Text and/or other creative content from
49:
438:Unknown-importance psychology articles
362:
7:
92:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
343:during his imprisonment in rural
172:Self-criticism (Marxism–Leninism)
112:Knowledge:WikiProject Psychology
79:
69:
51:
20:
443:WikiProject Psychology articles
433:Start-Class psychology articles
115:Template:WikiProject Psychology
1:
106:and see a list of open tasks.
213:19:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
418:01:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
367:21:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
310:23:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
295:15:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
252:07:03, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
459:
387:08:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
279:self-criticism (communism)
134:project's importance scale
170:was copied or moved into
131:
64:
46:
372:Always a negative thing?
272:04:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
231:20:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
281:, or just merged into
206:
200:
95:WikiProject Psychology
28:This article is rated
201:
195:
358:Nearly Headless Nick
178:. The former page's
237:Room For Improvment
184:provide attribution
118:psychology articles
300:America's puppet.
257:Communist Section?
34:content assessment
318:Under Khmer Rouge
190:
189:
148:
147:
144:
143:
140:
139:
87:Psychology portal
450:
364:
359:
283:struggle session
169:
157:
156:
150:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
458:
457:
453:
452:
451:
449:
448:
447:
423:
422:
374:
357:
320:
259:
244:AshleyHarper101
239:
165:
154:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
85:
80:
78:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
456:
454:
446:
445:
440:
435:
425:
424:
421:
420:
406:
405:
400:
399:
373:
370:
349:
348:
341:group cohesion
337:François Bizot
319:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
258:
255:
238:
235:
234:
233:
219:
188:
187:
182:now serves to
167:Self-criticism
158:
146:
145:
142:
141:
138:
137:
130:
124:
123:
121:
104:the discussion
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
455:
444:
441:
439:
436:
434:
431:
430:
428:
419:
415:
411:
408:
407:
402:
401:
396:
391:
390:
389:
388:
384:
380:
371:
369:
368:
365:
360:
354:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
321:
317:
311:
307:
303:
302:76.70.118.211
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:
274:
273:
269:
265:
256:
254:
253:
249:
245:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
216:
215:
214:
211:
210:82.43.195.131
205:
199:
194:
185:
181:
177:
173:
168:
163:
159:
152:
151:
135:
129:
126:
125:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
394:
375:
352:
350:
332:
328:
260:
240:
207:
202:
196:
191:
162:this version
93:
40:WikiProjects
404:whatsoever.
325:Khmer Rouge
323:'Under the
30:Start-class
427:Categories
379:WP Ludicer
351:The term "
109:Psychology
100:Psychology
59:Psychology
395:in favour
347:in 1971.'
264:Brighamhb
223:Janosabel
204:mistakes.
176:this edit
353:rien sot
345:Cambodia
333:The Gate
329:rien sot
287:Robofish
410:Dieknon
180:history
36:scale.
174:with
414:talk
383:talk
306:talk
291:talk
268:talk
248:talk
227:talk
363:{c}
164:of
128:???
429::
416:)
385:)
335:,
308:)
293:)
270:)
250:)
229:)
412:(
381:(
304:(
289:(
266:(
246:(
225:(
136:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
