298:
277:
227:
209:
406:
486:
181:
119:
95:
498:
396:
366:
64:
129:
1243:
The problem is that because of both
British and American influences both date formats can be seen to be used in Canada, although the British format is falling out of favour is not seen as frequently. The official policy on Knowledge is that either may be use, but one must be dominant within any given
1091:
Why I deleted the infobox was already explained in the accompanying edit summary; that it took out a date in the process means nothing to this discussion. WP:STRONGNAT makes no mention of the subsequent deletion of infoboxes with dates in them by individuals who are not the first major contributor to
1025:
Apparently "statistics aren't evidence" unless they're statistics compiled by you. Regardless, the statistics you've gathered (minus all the speculation) still affirm that BiN was the first major contributor. The article follows the format predominantly employed by the first major contributor and, as
1228:
I always use yyyy-mm-dd (all numeric) format for retrieval dates, and being
British, dd mm yyyy format elsewhere. However, this article is about a Canadian, so I would suggest using the Canadian format within the text and to consider using yyyy-mm-dd for retrieval dates. If you find the yyyy-mm-dd
709:
one paragraph that in its references used the
American date format and an infobox, which according to you shouldn't have been added, which included the British date format. That date editor also used the British date format in the references. No consistency. The majority of edits are made to correct
587:
at which point the majority format was
American. It was your edit that made the change M. Please don't impose your date format preference to the article which was clearly in American format before you started tinkering. Also, take it to 3rd opinion and the Canadian list now because I don't have time
991:
In short I don't think it's the number of edits made, particularly when they are fixing the original material, it's the total of the edits. Most of the edits don't address the date format and only two editors do. One doesn't show a preference for one format or other while the other does. Given that
1123:
Not really needing third-party input since you assume first major editor was Be in Nepean when it could be, and has been, argued that it's anon. Also the tie-breaking procedure should then fall to the other guideline: "article has evolved using predominantly one format, the whole article should
537:
states "The date format chosen by the first major contributor in the early stages of an article should continue to be used, unless there is reason to change it based on strong national ties to the topic." The first major contributor in these early stages,
1258:
Since all the dates are connected with article retrievals, may I suggest standarising on yyyy-mm-dd. Otherwise I would suggest that it is up to each editor to enter the in whatever way they see fit - after all it is the date in
1054:
When I wrote "statistics aren't evidence" I should have clarified: just showing raw numbers isn't sufficient evidence. I don't think I added any speculation when I listed the edits. I still contend that the stub is in growth
1362:
1087:
Based on the edit history, it's clear (as no matter which way you look at it) there have been two major contributors to this article so far: the anon and BiN. BiN came before the anon, so he's the first major
1190:
Seems to me that BiN was the first major edit of the article, though they didn't definitively pick a side. The anon did, though, and chose to use the
American-style date formatting. I'd continue with that. —
1407:
1357:
190:
105:
1367:
1208:
Well, obviously not completely how I see it, but I understand the need for compromise and how you're aiming for it. So, okay; let's leave it as it is. Thanks for the input. --
43:
718:
who added only
American date references. The next editors on the first day of that article made no effort to unify the date formats. How would you define a major editor? --
1417:
466:
1397:
1095:
If you're going to hold firm to the argument that the first major contributor's use of one format more than another has no bearing on this matter, then you leave
348:
338:
1412:
1382:
1347:
452:
48:
1402:
1377:
31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
655:
where it's stabilized. At that point all the dates are in the references. Four dates are in the
American format and one in British/International format.
661:
The "article has evolved using predominantly one format, the whole article should conform to it". To-date, it's been primarily
American date format. --
648:
The editor appears to have modified existing templates to insert the information. Interesting that there is no consensus in first editor's additions.
1427:
314:
1392:
1372:
476:
147:
23:
1432:
1422:
783:
Given that evidence, are you still going to try to seriously contend that Be in Nepean was not the first major contributor to this page? --
151:
1387:
1352:
305:
282:
155:
1073:
deleted one of those date formats as not being valid makes it a 50/50 split. Anon was the first editor to show a clear preference. --
428:
146:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
243:
142:
100:
651:
There were four editors within the first twenty-four hours and then nothing for over two weeks. So it's really the article at
614:
says "the date format chosen by the first major contributor", not "the date format chosen in the first edit," and if you look
511:
376:
419:
371:
75:
1172:- Is the date even the right date (same as her husbands), or do we just have the year that was originally there 1943)?
234:
214:
1282:
1249:
1129:
1078:
1016:
1001:
723:
666:
593:
1295:
show differnet styles of date representation, but the format yyyy-mm-dd is the most common one for retrieval dates.
297:
276:
1011:
Even if Be in Nepean was the first major editor, both date formats are present so which is the preferred? --
32:
1278:
1245:
1210:
1140:
1125:
1105:
1074:
1036:
1012:
997:
785:
777:
719:
683:
662:
628:
589:
560:
226:
208:
1103:, which leaves us still at an impasse. I suppose this can only be broken, yet again, by outside input. --
765:
310:
81:
1292:
741:
42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
1309:
If any of you use RefTools, the autofill for retrieval date is DD MMMM YYYY (e.g. 9 August 2010). —
63:
1062:
contributor, just the first contributor. I suspect the next step is to count bytes added. Based on
658:
611:
534:
1069:
Regardless, as I pointed-out, the editor didn't have a preference. 60/40 split. And the fact that
427:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
313:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
242:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1300:
1268:
1234:
46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
1310:
1217:
1192:
1147:
1112:
1043:
792:
759:
735:
690:
635:
567:
539:
134:
554:
references three minutes later). Thus, the date format should not be changed, as was done
39:
581:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&action=edit&oldid=372439388
1174:
985:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372514609
972:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372514524
966:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372513517
953:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372513268
947:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372507930
941:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372507755
935:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372475872
922:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372465553
909:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372465265
900:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372460269
894:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372459644
888:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372457314
882:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372457217
876:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372454947
870:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372440024
857:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372439710
851:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372439710
845:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372439570
839:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372439452
833:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=next&oldid=372439388
827:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sharon_Johnston&diff=prev&oldid=372439388
503:
458:
180:
1341:
1296:
1264:
1230:
747:
411:
753:
485:
878:- splitting paragraph and adding profession (first consistent use of date format)
118:
94:
771:
493:
401:
395:
365:
124:
602:
There are clearly two date formats in the first edit, one in the infobox (
579:
The first date format is listed in the reference in the very first edit:
1320:
1304:
1286:
1272:
1253:
1238:
1223:
1202:
1180:
1153:
1133:
1118:
1082:
1049:
1020:
1005:
798:
727:
696:
670:
641:
597:
573:
732:
In order of appearance at this page, prior to this date format dispute:
424:
154:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
239:
1363:
Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
992:
evidence... . Particularly since Be in Nepean isn't the first
461:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
457:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
57:
38:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
15:
484:
179:
1277:
Again, not sure that complies with the manual of style. --
817:
Within the first day these are the edits and their nature
1229:
format distasteful, then again, use the Canadian format.
583:. October 7, 1998. Restored. The one in the info box was
984:
971:
965:
952:
946:
940:
934:
921:
908:
899:
893:
887:
881:
875:
869:
856:
850:
844:
838:
832:
826:
715:
706:
652:
615:
584:
580:
555:
551:
547:
1408:
Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
1358:
C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
423:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
309:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
238:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
705:was not a major contributor. He used both formats.
588:today to play your political games. Thank you. --
859:- removing an unused template and adding cats
8:
1368:Politics and government work group articles
360:
271:
203:
89:
996:editor, anon is making seven changes. --
1099:with no more valid reason for use than
362:
273:
205:
91:
61:
1418:Low-importance Canada-related articles
626:three times. Your comments on that? --
191:the politics and government work group
1398:Low-importance Women writers articles
7:
417:This article is within the scope of
303:This article is within the scope of
232:This article is within the scope of
140:This article is within the scope of
1413:Start-Class Canada-related articles
1383:All WikiProject Women-related pages
1348:Biography articles of living people
618:, the first major contributor used
323:Knowledge:WikiProject Women writers
80:It is of interest to the following
1403:WikiProject Women writers articles
1378:C-Class WikiProject Women articles
714:. The first major contributor was
459:project-independent quality rating
326:Template:WikiProject Women writers
14:
1026:I already pointed out, he put in
1066:anon was the first major editor.
896:- adding ref and fixing spelling
496:
404:
394:
364:
296:
275:
225:
207:
127:
117:
93:
62:
21:This article must adhere to the
1428:Low-importance Ontario articles
835:- insertion of missing brackets
471:This article has been rated as
343:This article has been rated as
164:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
1393:C-Class Women writers articles
1373:WikiProject Biography articles
1058:Be in Nepean wasn't the first
167:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
710:errors made. Therefore not a
509:This article is supported by
431:and see a list of open tasks.
317:and see a list of open tasks.
246:and see a list of open tasks.
188:This article is supported by
24:biographies of living persons
1433:All WikiProject Canada pages
1423:Start-Class Ontario articles
814:Statistics aren't evidence.
606:) and one in the reference (
548:the creation of this article
437:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
152:contribute to the discussion
440:Template:WikiProject Canada
252:Knowledge:WikiProject Women
36:must be removed immediately
1449:
1388:WikiProject Women articles
1353:C-Class biography articles
1321:12:52, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
1305:11:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
1287:19:00, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
1273:12:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
1254:18:57, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
1239:18:39, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
1224:14:07, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
1203:02:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
1181:22:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
1154:21:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
1134:21:23, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
1119:21:06, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
1083:19:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
1050:19:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
1021:18:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
1006:18:39, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
799:17:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
728:17:32, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
697:17:09, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
671:16:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
642:15:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
598:15:17, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
574:15:09, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
477:project's importance scale
349:project's importance scale
258:WikiProject Women articles
255:Template:WikiProject Women
677:What date format did the
492:
470:
456:
389:
342:
306:WikiProject Women writers
291:
220:
187:
112:
88:
884:- adding missing bracket
829:- creation of material.
679:first major contributor
443:Canada-related articles
106:Politics and Government
1138:Perhaps. Let's see. --
974:- removing designation
489:
329:Women writers articles
184:
70:This article is rated
979:Anon (206.53.153.121)
916:Anon (99.237.156.139)
681:predominantly use? --
488:
183:
143:WikiProject Biography
904:adding stub template
968:- removing template
911:- adding birth year
864:Anon (67.69.104.66)
778:User:Walter Görlitz
766:User:206.53.153.121
512:WikiProject Ontario
1124:conform to it". --
742:User:67.69.104.66
546:in the infobox at
490:
420:WikiProject Canada
185:
170:biography articles
76:content assessment
1064:your "statistics"
872:- fixing template
760:User:Miesianiacal
736:User:Be in Nepean
540:User:Be in Nepean
527:
526:
523:
522:
519:
518:
359:
358:
355:
354:
270:
269:
266:
265:
235:WikiProject Women
202:
201:
198:
197:
56:
55:
1440:
1317:
1314:
1222:
1220:
1215:
1199:
1196:
1177:
1152:
1150:
1145:
1117:
1115:
1110:
1048:
1046:
1041:
797:
795:
790:
695:
693:
688:
640:
638:
633:
572:
570:
565:
506:
501:
500:
499:
445:
444:
441:
438:
435:
414:
409:
408:
407:
398:
391:
390:
385:
382:
379:
368:
361:
331:
330:
327:
324:
321:
300:
293:
292:
287:
279:
272:
260:
259:
256:
253:
250:
229:
222:
221:
211:
204:
172:
171:
168:
165:
162:
148:join the project
137:
135:Biography portal
132:
131:
130:
121:
114:
113:
108:
97:
90:
73:
67:
66:
58:
44:this noticeboard
16:
1448:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1338:
1337:
1315:
1312:
1218:
1211:
1209:
1197:
1194:
1188:
1175:
1148:
1141:
1139:
1113:
1106:
1104:
1044:
1037:
1035:
1034:three times. --
890:- adding phrase
793:
786:
784:
691:
684:
682:
636:
629:
627:
568:
561:
559:
532:
502:
497:
495:
442:
439:
436:
433:
432:
410:
405:
403:
383:
380:
374:
328:
325:
322:
319:
318:
285:
257:
254:
251:
248:
247:
169:
166:
163:
160:
159:
133:
128:
126:
103:
74:on Knowledge's
71:
12:
11:
5:
1446:
1444:
1436:
1435:
1430:
1425:
1420:
1415:
1410:
1405:
1400:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1380:
1375:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1355:
1350:
1340:
1339:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1279:Walter Görlitz
1246:Walter Görlitz
1187:
1184:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1126:Walter Görlitz
1093:
1089:
1075:Walter Görlitz
1067:
1056:
1013:Walter Görlitz
998:Walter Görlitz
989:
988:
981:
980:
976:
975:
969:
962:
961:
957:
956:
950:
944:
938:
931:
930:
926:
925:
918:
917:
913:
912:
906:
897:
891:
885:
879:
873:
866:
865:
861:
860:
854:
853:- adding a ref
848:
847:- adding a ref
842:
841:- adding a ref
836:
830:
823:
822:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
781:
775:
769:
763:
757:
751:
745:
739:
733:
720:Walter Görlitz
707:He contributed
674:
673:
663:Walter Görlitz
656:
649:
590:Walter Görlitz
531:
528:
525:
524:
521:
520:
517:
516:
508:
507:
504:Ontario portal
491:
481:
480:
473:Low-importance
469:
463:
462:
455:
449:
448:
446:
429:the discussion
416:
415:
399:
387:
386:
384:Low‑importance
369:
357:
356:
353:
352:
345:Low-importance
341:
335:
334:
332:
315:the discussion
301:
289:
288:
286:Low‑importance
280:
268:
267:
264:
263:
261:
244:the discussion
230:
218:
217:
212:
200:
199:
196:
195:
186:
176:
175:
173:
139:
138:
122:
110:
109:
98:
86:
85:
79:
68:
54:
53:
49:this help page
33:poorly sourced
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1445:
1434:
1431:
1429:
1426:
1424:
1421:
1419:
1416:
1414:
1411:
1409:
1406:
1404:
1401:
1399:
1396:
1394:
1391:
1389:
1386:
1384:
1381:
1379:
1376:
1374:
1371:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1346:
1345:
1343:
1322:
1319:
1318:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1216:
1214:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1200:
1186:Third opinion
1185:
1183:
1182:
1179:
1178:
1171:
1155:
1151:
1146:
1144:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1116:
1111:
1109:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1047:
1042:
1040:
1033:
1029:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
986:
983:
982:
978:
977:
973:
970:
967:
964:
963:
959:
958:
954:
951:
948:
945:
942:
939:
936:
933:
932:
928:
927:
924:- adding cats
923:
920:
919:
915:
914:
910:
907:
905:
901:
898:
895:
892:
889:
886:
883:
880:
877:
874:
871:
868:
867:
863:
862:
858:
855:
852:
849:
846:
843:
840:
837:
834:
831:
828:
825:
824:
820:
819:
818:
815:
800:
796:
791:
789:
782:
779:
776:
773:
770:
767:
764:
761:
758:
755:
752:
749:
748:User:Rmachenw
746:
743:
740:
737:
734:
731:
730:
729:
725:
721:
717:
713:
708:
704:
700:
699:
698:
694:
689:
687:
680:
676:
675:
672:
668:
664:
660:
657:
654:
650:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
639:
634:
632:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
600:
599:
595:
591:
586:
585:later removed
582:
578:
577:
576:
575:
571:
566:
564:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
536:
529:
514:
513:
505:
494:
487:
483:
482:
478:
474:
468:
465:
464:
460:
454:
451:
450:
447:
430:
426:
422:
421:
413:
412:Canada portal
402:
400:
397:
393:
392:
388:
378:
373:
370:
367:
363:
350:
346:
340:
337:
336:
333:
320:Women writers
316:
312:
311:women writers
308:
307:
302:
299:
295:
294:
290:
284:
283:Women writers
281:
278:
274:
262:
245:
241:
237:
236:
231:
228:
224:
223:
219:
216:
213:
210:
206:
193:
192:
182:
178:
177:
174:
157:
156:documentation
153:
149:
145:
144:
136:
125:
123:
120:
116:
115:
111:
107:
102:
99:
96:
92:
87:
83:
77:
69:
65:
60:
59:
51:
50:
45:
41:
37:
34:
30:
26:
25:
20:
18:
17:
1311:
1291:Examples in
1260:
1219:MIESIANIACAL
1212:
1193:
1189:
1173:
1169:
1168:
1149:MIESIANIACAL
1142:
1114:MIESIANIACAL
1107:
1100:
1096:
1092:the article.
1088:contributor.
1070:
1063:
1059:
1045:MIESIANIACAL
1038:
1031:
1027:
993:
990:
960:Miesianiacal
955:- adding cat
949:- adding cat
903:
821:Be in Nepean
816:
813:
794:MIESIANIACAL
787:
754:User:Bearcat
712:major editor
711:
703:first editor
702:
692:MIESIANIACAL
685:
678:
659:WP:STRONGNAT
637:MIESIANIACAL
630:
623:
619:
612:WP:STRONGNAT
610:). However,
607:
603:
569:MIESIANIACAL
562:
543:
535:WP:STRONGNAT
533:
510:
472:
418:
344:
304:
233:
189:
141:
82:WikiProjects
47:
35:
28:
22:
1263:time zone.
1244:article. --
1097:MM DD, YYYY
1028:MM DD, YYYY
622:twice, but
620:MM DD, YYYY
608:MM DD, YYYY
552:when adding
550:(and again
530:Date format
381:Start‑class
1342:Categories
1293:WP:CITE/ES
1101:DD MM YYYY
1032:DD MM YYYY
987:- see also
937:- refactor
780:: 2 edits.
772:User:Dowew
762:: 2 edits.
756:: 2 edits.
750:: 2 edits.
744:: 7 edits.
738:: 6 edits.
653:this point
624:DD MM YYYY
604:DD MM YYYY
544:DD MM YYYY
1176:Connormah
774:: 1 edit.
768:: 1 edit.
161:Biography
101:Biography
40:libellous
1297:Martinvl
1265:Martinvl
1231:Martinvl
943:- redact
929:Rmachenw
1316:Annyong
1198:Annyong
1170:Comment
1030:twice,
542:, used
475:on the
377:Ontario
347:on the
72:C-class
434:Canada
425:Canada
372:Canada
78:scale.
1313:Hello
1261:their
1195:Hello
1060:major
1055:mode.
994:major
453:Start
249:Women
240:women
215:Women
1301:talk
1283:talk
1269:talk
1250:talk
1235:talk
1130:talk
1079:talk
1017:talk
1002:talk
724:talk
716:anon
701:The
667:talk
616:here
594:talk
558:. --
556:here
150:and
1071:you
467:Low
339:Low
29:BLP
1344::
1303:)
1285:)
1271:)
1252:)
1237:)
1132:)
1081:)
1019:)
1004:)
902:-
726:)
669:)
596:)
375::
104::
1299:(
1281:(
1267:(
1248:(
1233:(
1213:Ħ
1143:Ħ
1128:(
1108:Ħ
1077:(
1039:Ħ
1015:(
1000:(
788:Ħ
722:(
686:Ħ
665:(
631:Ħ
592:(
563:Ħ
515:.
479:.
351:.
194:.
158:.
84::
52:.
27:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
