Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Shocker (gesture)

Source 📝

584: 522: 464: 436: 74: 53: 84: 162: 835:. For one, it's not hand gesture, it's a sex act. Additionally, it has very little resemblence to the shocker and really doesn't apply to being a varient of the shocker. Finally, the description of the act referenced the ring finger as being both extended (with the middle finger) as well as bent down (with the pinky). Trying to find the correct arrangement of fingers revealed only one real reference ( 22: 2135: 1921:
I have twice removed the popular culture section. The first time it was sourced to an unreliable source. It was put back with the comment that three reliable sources were added. All three sources said the same thing, that according to the unreliable source this happened. The according to in the three
1773:
There's a buddhist handgesture that looks similar in principle. The right hand's ringfinger touches the tip of the thumb (forming a circle), with middle- and indexfinger held together and straight and the pinky also straight. The hand is hold at shoulder level. If my memory serves right, it should be
847:
I disagree, or at least, this information needs to be sourced. I have a picture of me doing the Shocker on the rock n roller coaster in Feb of 2005. In addition to the original disagreement I posted before (first sentence), I did a shocker on Space Mountain at Disneyland Park on October 5,2006 and it
256:
I disagree, simply because on reading the article, I was amused for a good five minutes. Knowledge (XXG) is certainly not free of adolescent toilet humor, and this is pop culture at its best/worst! If it needs to come out of this article, perhaps it could be listed as its own article. Articles aren't
1176:
the shocker? Do women like it? I see the gesture a lot, but in reality I think it's kind of impractical (sexually speaking). You can't ask your partner if she wants the shocker...that's the whole point! it's the SHOCKer. I tried it on my girlfriend once and she FREAKED (and I don't mean in a good
538:
The form with the blanks is a generalized form that describes almost all the variations of this saying. There are some who insist on putting in a less generalized, more specific form there which is less descriptive of the actual phenomenon. I would not be opposed to having 1-5 examples, e.g. "Two in
1293:
LOL, your g/f actually freaked out! Usually, people are too timid to get mad in bed. Maybe there was just too much shock factor in your shocker. I've been using it for years now, and just recently stumbled on this site. The ring finger has to be curled back to ovoid the perenium (taint). As long as
1323:. The titles are Teaser, Pleaser, Shocker, Spocker, Rocker, and Showstopper. Seems they're missing a few configurations (anal only, four in the vagina, fisting, anal fisting, double fisting, etc.) but they do cover what could be considered the more practical configurations/variations of the theme. 1191:
I believe the shocker was invented my www.collegehumor.com, but I can't find proof. True, there's a million guys out there claiming it was their idea. I'm in canada, and alot of people I know do know what the shocker is, so it's pop culture reference is spreading. We do need to find it's history
629:
Okay, I have added one example, which I feel is the most widely used one and probably about the only one from the list actually in wide usage. Googling "Two in the pink, one in the stink" yields 827 pages. The only other one I've heard in major usage, "Two in the coo, one in the poo" only yields 5
1029:
Yes, I saw the conversation, and was not moved by the arguments contained therein. I'll see if I can revert it. One things that's so infuriating about wikipedia is that the decisions seem to be made the the loudest, bullyingest, losers, with more time than I have to change things around to meet
484:
While I can also confirm that some of the terms on the previous list are used in actual conversations, especially on college campuses, this change is not about censorship. In my mind, this change was about whether an unnecessarily long list, which was 2-5 times larger than the article itself, was
1966:
Inside The Magic is a valid source since it's "been featured in the Orlando Sentinel, on FOX35 and Local 6 news in Orlando, and won Best Best Produced Podcast in the 2011 Podcast Awards". There "articles, photos, and videos have been referenced and linked to by popular web sites and news outlets
651:
I agree with the above comments, and think that "two in the pink, one in the stink" should be included. I think that stuff like this is what makes Knowledge (XXG) better than all other encyclopedias, because it has entries such as this one, documenting things that other encyclopedias would most
1671:
Quick summary: In 2000, 34 students were told all yearbook photos in which they appeared doing the shocker would be retaken-- not just without them doing the shocker, but without the offending students appearing whatsoever... and at their expense. They'd also have to do community service, and
1619:
The way I learned this, in the mid-90s, was with the thumb extended. THAT was the shocker. More of an electric shock than a shock of surprise. College Humor sort of pioneered the thumbless shocker (in my awareness), but it was always slightly annoying to my "real" shocker. No one else has this
1106:
Is the shocker a common gesture outside of the US? I have a non-American friend who displays the gesture proudly in photographs, which is quite dissonant with her other behavior and makes me wonder if she understands the meaning. Are there different meanings in other parts of the world?
1535:
instance of 'Occurrences in culture' unless it explicitly uses the word shocker with defining characteristics. As it is, I am not seeing that. I'll wait for a response, but understand that without incredibly convincing arguments otherwise, there doesn't seem a valid reason to retain it. -
988:
Who keeps taking off the list? It contains legitimate variants to the original. In fact, one who only searches for a variant will arrive at the original. Without the list of legitimate variations on the theme, it cannot be traced back to the shocker. I'll revert it if I can figure out
309:
I disagree with the removal of the list. It captures an essential form of Americana: the joyously prurient. That the Shocker is now widely in evidence at public sporting games speaks to its subversive nature, too, in a time of right wing repression. "One up the Cheney" indeed. :-)
1717: 1662:
I'm surprised this isn't mentioned-- I had been under the impression this was the origin of the shocker, though now I think I was wrong, as I don't see it claimed that this was the gesture's origin, and from other comments, it sounds like it appeared earlier elsewhere.
415:
I am not the one who enterd two in the pink one in the stink. Though there is no reason for this censorship. non-censorship is what the internet is about. These slang terms are used throughtout highschool and colleges all over, I should know, I live in one.
240:"There are a number of other terms for this hand gesture, most of which take the form "Two in the _______, one in the _______," where the first blank is filled with a slang term for vagina and the second blank is filled with a rhyming slang term for anus." 725:
It depends on the female who is recieving such an act, and the hand of her partnet, however it is usually possible. The total ignorance of the woman's clitoris is a blatant bit of ignorance, though. As well, not everyone appreciates standardized sex.
1201:
I've done some searching on the origins(as that's why I came to this article in the first place). I couldn't find anything verifiable. I suppose It will never be known, like who first uddered "pardon my french" or who first called the baseball
1318:
So my new girlfriend (lucky me, huh!) mentioned that there were variations on this theme for every hand configuration. I think this would be a decent addition to this page. I believe the original picture with the titles is on collegehumor.com:
1672:
absence from that service would mean not receiving their diplomas. Parents were so outraged with this punishment that the principal who imposed it eventually resigned. The hands doing the shocker were simply airbrushed out of the photos.
1235:
I'm 34 yrs old and we were throwing the shocker in college back in 1993. I still have a picture with a couple of buddies from 1994 as evidence. So it must have been around earlier than that. I'd love to see some research..... Domn8r59
867:
can be seen making the gesture during the preshow. Despite this fact, if a guest makes the gesture at one of its attractions where a souvenir photo is taken, the photo will not be displayed and it will not be allowed for purchase.
211:
American hair metal band Steel Panther have a song called "The Shocker" on their 2009 album "Feel The Steel" which makes direct reference to this gesture with the lyrics "two in the pink one in the stink thats called the shocker"
1082:
Should this nonsense really be the main direct for shocker? Wouldn't the Spider-Man villain and the horror movie be more relevant? I've never heard or seen this gesture before. There's not even a disambiguation page at the top.
924:
Hardy's hand signal is different. He touches his thumb to his ring finger, and spreads his index and middle fingers apart. It's not supposed to be a 'shocker', it's supposed to look like "V1" for "Version One", his nickname.
1953:
The article you linked to above says "According to the Inside the Magic site," It isn't Billboard saying this, if it was then it would be a reliable source. The whole thing is attributed to a single non reliable source.
1727: 1480:
use a gesture very much like this (with the thumb extended, it looks like a W). If not, it's a pretty cool coincidence that a team called the Shockers uses a hand gesture called the shocker that was named independently.
485:
worthy of keeping in an encyclopedia. I feel the current format gives you the basic layout of the term, with the generalized example (which I have to keep reverting) accounting for at least 90% of the variations.
1139:
It's used in Australia occasionally for the connotations expressed here, that is, as a general vulgar reference, just as the middle finger is...not as commonly, and generally in a humorous light rather than
911:
Where is the picture of the Wichita State cheerleader from ESPN? It was: 1) an actual display, which the article should have, and 2) cultural context and a visual "sourcing!" Jgates, 21:00 6 March 2007
848:
showed up fine. If it is something that is removed (and I am sure boob shots and middle fingers are), then the shocker must not be an official policy or needs to be sourced, so I removed the paragraph.
1172:
I'm sure there are about a million people who claim to have "invented" the shocker, but could there be a verifiable source concerning the origin of the gesture? Secondly...has anyone actually ever
2086:
The first source still exists; it appears that the newspaper's archives are not currently working. It is not "corrupt", and there is no reason to remove it. The second source is acceptable per
140: 2147: 2184: 130: 539:
the pink, one in the stink." However, I feel that if we allow any specific examples, the list will just repopulate itself, and we'll have the same problem all over again. Thoughts?
1939:
source isn't valid. I thought that fairly obvious information was accepted on Knowledge (XXG). Steven Tyler himself (verifiable) posted a tweet on twitter about the situation...
2189: 106: 2179: 1865: 1861: 1847: 1294:
you make it seem like an accident (sort of like the booby brush) you can get away with it. As for who invented the shocker, I'm sure even the ancient Romans used it =P
386:
As a hand gesture, I think the casual observer would understand this article better with a picture. Can anyone provide a good (non copyvio) picture to put on the page?
1712: 1596:
If you just spread your index and middle finger (while DISPLAYING the gesture, not actually performing the act, obviously), it becomes a W, signifying alliance to the
237:
In looking at the list, I think it is excessively long and does not add to the quality of the article. I think most of the list could be summarized by the following:
1722: 97: 58: 1936: 1406: 2009:
I have removed all three links, making this article up for speedy deletion. The first link is corrupt. The second link is an author's opinions, and not facts (
949: 1524:
Okay, following that reasoning, why the inclusion of the rap lyrics? As the word "shocker" is uttered nowhere in the song, it requires the editor to use
887: 1732: 1747:
Should it be mentioned, if nothing else, that this gesture has very different older meanings than the one currently described in the article?
324:
One way or another, if this is not on the original list then it should be on the next one: It goes, "Two in the bush, one in the tush." Enjoy.
1436:. Note the separation of all fingers. As illustrated on the Shocker page, the index and middle fingers are placed together. Class dismissed. 630:
Google hits. Most of the others from the list probably yield zero. Hopefully this 1 example won't increase the edits to repopulate the list.
2143: 2127: 741:
There is a variant known as the "Viper" which adds the thumb as "one for the bean". There's also the "Showstopper", which is simply a fist.
187: 1775: 1153: 473:
Many of you may not have noticed that this is an encyclopedia, and encyclopedias generally don't contain endless lists of dubious slang.
2112: 2096: 1601: 1271: 673: 2010: 1505:
However, these sections can attract non-notable entries, especially when they are in list format, and should be carefully maintained.
257:
just about noteworthy knowledge; a list of pop culture references like this, while silly, is something that should be archived here.
179: 1754: 891: 778: 1688: 2194: 1597: 33: 1507:
Carefully curating these sections (if we have them at all) means excluding references to non-notable media and entertainers.
1251: 1967:
including LA Times, New York Times, Fox News, USA Today, Yahoo!, MSN, Huffington Post, Boing Boing, and even Perez Hilton."
2070:
the article but not speedy delete it. I have been around long enough to know the reasons to keep or delete an article. --
1648: 1742: 1577: 502:
The list problem I can understand. But, why is "Two in the _______, one in the _______," being censored in the article?
583: 521: 463: 435: 1503:
suggests that these sections be carefully source additions, and not devolve into trivia and fancruft. It also states,
1343: 173: 1461: 2090:. NPOV applies to content, not sources. The third source is questionable and may require further review. Regards, 1825: 1453: 945: 856: 444:
I have reviewed the revision, and I agree that the list should be put back up. It sates the culture of the times.
1864:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
280:
used in real life? Or have people been just making them up? If so, it's not really a pop cultural reference.
270:
Get rid of the list, or at least greatly shorten with note that other terms are also used. Yeah its funny but:
2106:
I've provided an archived version of the first source and removed the third source as self-published. Regards,
1644: 1477: 1779: 1157: 39: 1275: 815:
section; I'm lazy, so I haven't checked anywhere else. Just don't mix that up—it sets a bad precedence. : -->
677: 1605: 1573: 1432:
The page has been protected because of repeat "haha, Bush did the shocker" insertions. Let's clarify this:
1351: 2139: 2048:
claims "If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Knowledge (XXG) should not have an article on it."
1758: 1750: 1500: 1267: 1239: 1149: 774: 669: 564:
I absolutely agree, we dont have to give a list. But "Two in the pink, one in the stink." should be shown.
21: 1922:
sources make then unreliable for this information. We would need a reliable source to say it happened. --
1797: 1709:
Wasn't this gesture originally a traditional Orthodox Christian sign of blessing used in icons? Examples:
1564: 1515: 1444: 1367: 782: 89: 1043: 941: 690: 1903: 1883:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1871: 1486: 1457: 1328: 1247: 895: 704: 325: 105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1108: 1093: 1084: 926: 2150:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
812: 715: 689:
This page is incomplete without a discussion of whether or not the shocker is anatomically possible.
373: 183: 83: 73: 52: 2161: 2053: 2022: 1976: 1944: 1324: 1243: 1182: 1092:
Searching for "shocker", and entering it after en.wikipedia.org/, now takes me to a redirect page.
714:
Have you EVER seen female anatomy? Why on earth would you think it wasn't anatomically possible? --
2014: 1047: 653: 2107: 2091: 1621: 1346: 1868:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1884: 1807: 1694: 1643:, which leads to 404. The reference should either be removed or the link corrected. Anyone? -- 1558: 1544: 1509: 1438: 1413: 1361: 1299: 852: 343: 2063: 1666: 2074: 2036: 1989: 1985:
It is a self published website with no editorial oversight. It is not a reliable source. --
1958: 1926: 1899: 1625: 1482: 1388: 1223: 1124: 1062: 1016: 970: 281: 2087: 2067: 2045: 1891: 1525: 1051: 182:
at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it,
1815: 1203: 1193: 742: 635: 544: 490: 391: 247: 102: 2151: 2049: 2018: 1972: 1940: 1850:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1264:
think some kid did it on conan obrien once. conan thought it was a gang sign at first
1178: 609: 474: 315: 298: 1890:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1857: 821: 400:
The picture on there now does not show the thumb extended as described in the text. --
2173: 1677: 1556:
Scrapping this (and any) pop culture/trivia section will draw no objections from me.
1002:
As for the list, see the above conversation, as that states why it shouldn't be here.
871: 258: 1600:. So I'm pretty sure that it is easy to accidentally do the shocker gesture, right? 1359:
He's most likely doing the Arizona Sun Devils "pitchfork" (see mention in article).
839:) on a college joke page and again, referenced it as a sex act, not a hand gesture. 1690: 1537: 1409: 1295: 1213: 1031: 990: 953: 860: 755: 339: 2148:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Shocker (hand gesture
1433: 1344:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/11/images/20081112_d-0077-5-515h.html
2071: 2033: 2032:
Removing the sources does not make the article eligible for speedy deletion. --
1986: 1955: 1923: 1384: 1218: 1119: 1057: 1011: 965: 727: 401: 221: 1826:
https://web.archive.org/20060515142711/http://www.fcnp.com:80/603/splinters.htm
1342:
GW Bush unwittingly making the gesture, plus a presumably public domain photo:
234:
In regards to whether this page should have a long list of names for the term:
1856:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1320: 631: 565: 540: 503: 486: 445: 417: 387: 363: 243: 79: 864: 2165: 2117: 2101: 2077: 2057: 2039: 2026: 1992: 1980: 1961: 1948: 1929: 1911: 1783: 1762: 1698: 1681: 1652: 1629: 1609: 1581: 1567: 1551: 1518: 1490: 1465: 1447: 1417: 1392: 1370: 1353: 1332: 1303: 1279: 1255: 1229: 1206: 1196: 1186: 1161: 1130: 1111: 1096: 1087: 1069: 1034: 1023: 993: 977: 956: 929: 899: 874: 836: 811:
I saw it misstated in the caption of the picture of the cheerleader in the
786: 745: 732: 718: 707: 693: 656: 638: 612: 587: 547: 525: 493: 477: 467: 439: 404: 394: 376: 372:
Why was it changed? It was much better before it all got taken out... From
366: 347: 318: 314:
That's nice, but this is an encyclopedia. Also, please sign your comments.
301: 284: 261: 250: 224: 1673: 818: 771:
Dude, if you can't figure it out, don't even attempt sex with a female.
2134: 1829: 1812:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
1640: 297:
I agree with the removal of the list. People just make these things up.
1968: 805:
it: to display it is just to show the gesture, but to deliver it is to
1737: 1667:
Rotten.com article about the Hanover High School shocker controversy
999:
For future reference, make all comments at the bottom of talk pages.
1820:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
1531:
Frankly, if we are going to be this stringent, I suggest we purge
751: 1146:
It is also called the 'barracuda' in Australia, after the fish.
1383:, and demonstrating that the fingers must be placed together. — 2138:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
1476:
Anyone know for sure where the name came from? I know that the
1456:
for more information to anyone that still does not understand.
1408:.. Sincerely, your bemused (and slightly horrified ) WikiGnome 156: 15: 273:
Looks like original research. Is there a citation for these?
1835:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
920:
He uses the shocker as his gesture, should this be on here?
1117:
The same gesture is the number 6 in sign language as well.
178:, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the 666:
The list is what makes this page even worth having._MRN_
362:
Who the hell made that list? Whoever did, good job! From
1796:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1801: 336: 195: 1379:
It could probably be worked in as an example of what
2044:
Sorry that was not the context I meant to push. But
1216:
was established), so that idea definitely is false.
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1860:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 950:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary
276:Even if there is, are all, or most, of these names 608:I would have no problem with one or two examples. 115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sexology and sexuality 2185:Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles 1846:This message was posted before February 2018. 1434:this is the Arizona State University pitchfork 1405:Revised archive link, for anyone who cares: 8: 1639:The reference number four contains the link 1212:It's been around far longer than 1999 (when 2190:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles 1321:http://www.collegehumor.com/picture:1750050 118:Template:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality 2180:Stub-Class Sexology and sexuality articles 1658:Most famous case(?) : Hanover High School 1005:Plus, there were no sources for the names. 47: 19: 1774:the "Gesture of Discord" or "Kartari". –– 1102:Strictly American, or more international? 837:http://www.collegehumor.com/jokes/24143/ 797:There's an important difference between 1641:"Picking Splinters March's Ls & Ws" 1528:to connect the word to the description. 807:actually put it in the bodily cavities. 761:Don't forget the Swirl at the end!  :-D 49: 1718:Saint Nazary Valaamsky making the sign 884:"two for the Pink, one for the stink" 2011:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view 1830:http://www.fcnp.com/603/splinters.htm 7: 1713:Saint Simeon Nemanja making the sign 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 2126:"Shocker (hand gesture" listed at 2017:, as it is a self-published book. 335:If anyone wants to see this list: 98:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality 14: 2013:). The third link is invalid per 1800:. Please take a moment to review 1054:. Keep the environment friendly! 2146:. This discussion will occur at 2133: 831:I just removed the reference to 827:Removed reference to six packing 582: 520: 462: 434: 160: 82: 72: 51: 20: 962:Agreed. I'll keep removing it. 135:This article has been rated as 121:Sexology and sexuality articles 1723:Saint Nicholas making the sign 1653:08:45, 20 September 2013 (UTC) 944:, since it obviously violates 699:Of course it is. How could it 680:) 18:53, August 29, 2007 (UTC) 1: 1763:03:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 1466:10:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 1448:00:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 1393:01:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 1371:00:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 1354:19:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 1304:12:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 1230:01:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 1162:13:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 946:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 657:05:20, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 377:20:03, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 367:20:03, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 319:00:10, 18 November 2005 (UTC) 302:07:48, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 285:20:17, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 2166:19:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC) 1912:06:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC) 1705:Use in Christian iconography 1682:21:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 1610:23:04, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 1491:20:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC) 1454:The Pitchfork (hand gesture) 1333:00:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 1256:01:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1046:. Also, please refrain from 900:23:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 639:08:02, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 613:07:51, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 588:00:08, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 548:21:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 526:19:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 494:18:42, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 478:08:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 468:07:32, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 440:07:13, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 395:04:44, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 262:23:14, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 251:03:44, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 225:10:32, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 2118:23:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 2102:23:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 2078:23:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 2058:23:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 2040:22:57, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 2027:22:53, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 1993:23:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 1981:23:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 1962:23:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 1949:22:56, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 1930:22:09, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 1733:Jesus making the sign again 1207:04:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1197:18:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 1187:06:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 875:16:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 193:Review: October 24, 2005. ( 2211: 2062:That would be a reason to 1877:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1818:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 1793:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1582:17:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1568:17:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1552:06:19, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1131:19:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1112:07:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1097:07:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 957:22:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 930:15:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 220:There are no references. 141:project's importance scale 1519:20:27, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 822:05:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 787:01:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 708:16:29, 9 April 2006 (UTC) 694:15:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC) 405:06:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 2128:Redirects for discussion 1784:17:43, 7 July 2015 (UTC) 1699:17:45, 25 May 2018 (UTC) 1630:00:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC) 1418:17:41, 25 May 2018 (UTC) 1280:14:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 1088:04:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 1070:16:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 1035:16:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 1024:22:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 994:22:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 978:14:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 843:Disney bans the Shocker? 793:Careful with 'delivery'! 792: 746:06:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC) 733:01:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 348:17:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC) 2142:and has thus listed it 1935:I'm not quite sure how 1917:Popular culture section 1789:External links modified 1496:Popular culture section 940:I removed the mnemonic 857:Rock 'n' Roller Coaster 719:19:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 2195:Delisted good articles 1798:Shocker (hand gesture) 1478:Wichita State Shockers 685:Anatomically possible? 652:certainly leave out. 112:Sexology and sexuality 90:Human sexuality portal 59:Sexology and sexuality 28:This article is rated 2140:Shocker (hand gesture 1728:Jesus making the sign 890:comment was added by 813:'Notable Appearances' 636:(Leave me a message!) 545:(Leave me a message!) 491:(Leave me a message!) 392:(Leave me a message!) 248:(Leave me a message!) 180:good article criteria 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 1858:regular verification 1843:to let others know. 1804:. If necessary, add 1848:After February 2018 1839:parameter below to 1645:White rotten rabbit 1853:InternetArchiveBot 1574:Sharksaredangerous 1501:Pop culture policy 34:content assessment 1910: 1878: 1753:comment added by 1549: 1282: 1270:comment added by 1258: 1242:comment added by 1192:and origins, tho. 1164: 1152:comment added by 1052:assume good faith 903: 853:Walt Disney World 789: 777:comment added by 750:Wasn't that what 681: 672:comment added by 204: 203: 200: 186:; it may then be 168:Shocker (gesture) 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 2202: 2158: 2137: 1906: 1905:Talk to my owner 1901: 1876: 1875: 1854: 1819: 1811: 1765: 1562: 1548: 1545: 1542: 1513: 1458:Cardsplayer4life 1442: 1381:is not a shocker 1365: 1265: 1237: 1226: 1221: 1147: 1129: 1127: 1122: 1068: 1067: 1065: 1060: 1048:personal attacks 1022: 1021: 1019: 1014: 976: 975: 973: 968: 885: 801:the shocker and 772: 730: 705:Cardsplayer4life 667: 586: 580: 577: 574: 571: 568: 524: 518: 515: 512: 509: 506: 466: 460: 457: 454: 451: 448: 438: 432: 429: 426: 423: 420: 198: 196:Reviewed version 192: 164: 163: 157: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2210: 2209: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2170: 2169: 2152: 2131: 2115: 2099: 2007: 1919: 1909: 1904: 1869: 1862:have permission 1852: 1813: 1805: 1791: 1771: 1748: 1707: 1660: 1637: 1617: 1594: 1592:West Coast sign 1560: 1546: 1538: 1511: 1498: 1474: 1440: 1430: 1363: 1340: 1316: 1224: 1219: 1170: 1125: 1120: 1118: 1104: 1080: 1063: 1058: 1056: 1055: 1017: 1012: 1010: 1009: 986: 971: 966: 964: 963: 938: 918: 909: 907:Picture removed 886:—The preceding 882: 845: 829: 795: 728: 716:Dogbreathcanada 687: 578: 575: 572: 569: 566: 516: 513: 510: 507: 504: 458: 455: 452: 449: 446: 430: 427: 424: 421: 418: 413: 384: 360: 232: 218: 209: 194: 161: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 103:human sexuality 88: 81: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 2208: 2206: 2198: 2197: 2192: 2187: 2182: 2172: 2171: 2144:for discussion 2130: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2111: 2095: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2006: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1969:read more here 1918: 1915: 1902: 1896: 1895: 1888: 1833: 1832: 1824:Added archive 1790: 1787: 1776:85.178.187.141 1770: 1769:Buddhist Mudra 1767: 1706: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1687:Archive link: 1659: 1656: 1636: 1633: 1616: 1613: 1593: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1529: 1497: 1494: 1473: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1374: 1373: 1339: 1336: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1233: 1232: 1169: 1166: 1154:210.49.142.197 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1134: 1133: 1103: 1100: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1027: 1026: 1006: 1003: 1000: 985: 982: 981: 980: 937: 934: 933: 932: 917: 914: 908: 905: 881: 878: 844: 841: 828: 825: 794: 791: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 736: 735: 722: 721: 711: 710: 691:140.247.248.52 686: 683: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 644: 643: 642: 641: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 531: 530: 529: 528: 497: 496: 481: 480: 412: 409: 408: 407: 383: 380: 374:User:RonMexico 371: 359: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 322: 321: 307: 306: 305: 304: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 274: 265: 264: 231: 228: 217: 214: 208: 205: 202: 201: 191: 165: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Low-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2207: 2196: 2193: 2191: 2188: 2186: 2183: 2181: 2178: 2177: 2175: 2168: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2157: 2156: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2136: 2129: 2125: 2119: 2114: 2109: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2098: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2079: 2076: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2038: 2035: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2004: 1994: 1991: 1988: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1960: 1957: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1928: 1925: 1916: 1914: 1913: 1907: 1900: 1893: 1889: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1873: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1849: 1844: 1842: 1838: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1809: 1803: 1799: 1794: 1788: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1768: 1766: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1745: 1744: 1740: 1739: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1689: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1669: 1668: 1664: 1657: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1634: 1632: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1614: 1612: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1602:24.189.87.160 1599: 1591: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1566: 1565: 1563: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1543: 1541: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1514: 1506: 1502: 1495: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1479: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1446: 1445: 1443: 1435: 1427: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1366: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1349: 1348:Modest Genius 1345: 1337: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1313: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1272:75.30.187.161 1269: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1231: 1228: 1227: 1222: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1205: 1199: 1198: 1195: 1189: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1175: 1167: 1165: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1132: 1128: 1123: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1110: 1101: 1099: 1098: 1095: 1090: 1089: 1086: 1077: 1071: 1066: 1061: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1033: 1030:their whims. 1025: 1020: 1015: 1007: 1004: 1001: 998: 997: 996: 995: 992: 983: 979: 974: 969: 961: 960: 959: 958: 955: 951: 947: 943: 935: 931: 928: 923: 922: 921: 915: 913: 906: 904: 901: 897: 893: 889: 879: 877: 876: 873: 869: 866: 862: 858: 854: 849: 842: 840: 838: 834: 826: 824: 823: 820: 814: 809: 808: 804: 800: 790: 788: 784: 780: 776: 760: 759: 757: 753: 749: 748: 747: 744: 740: 739: 738: 737: 734: 731: 724: 723: 720: 717: 713: 712: 709: 706: 702: 698: 697: 696: 695: 692: 684: 682: 679: 675: 674:12.171.146.74 671: 658: 655: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 640: 637: 633: 628: 627: 626: 625: 614: 611: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 589: 585: 581: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 549: 546: 542: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 527: 523: 519: 501: 500: 499: 498: 495: 492: 488: 483: 482: 479: 476: 472: 471: 470: 469: 465: 461: 442: 441: 437: 433: 410: 406: 403: 399: 398: 397: 396: 393: 389: 381: 379: 378: 375: 369: 368: 365: 357: 349: 345: 341: 337: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326:Sonusfaber808 320: 317: 313: 312: 311: 303: 300: 296: 295: 294: 293: 286: 283: 279: 275: 272: 271: 269: 268: 267: 266: 263: 260: 255: 254: 253: 252: 249: 245: 241: 238: 235: 229: 227: 226: 223: 215: 213: 207:Steel Panther 206: 197: 189: 185: 181: 177: 176: 175: 169: 166: 159: 158: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2154: 2153: 2132: 2008: 1920: 1897: 1872:source check 1851: 1845: 1840: 1836: 1834: 1795: 1792: 1772: 1749:— Preceding 1746: 1741: 1736: 1731: 1726: 1721: 1716: 1711: 1708: 1670: 1665: 1661: 1638: 1620:definition? 1618: 1595: 1557: 1539: 1532: 1508: 1504: 1499: 1475: 1437: 1431: 1380: 1360: 1347: 1341: 1317: 1234: 1217: 1214:CollegeHumor 1200: 1190: 1173: 1171: 1145: 1140:agressively. 1109:65.12.16.199 1105: 1094:65.12.16.199 1091: 1085:68.166.70.23 1081: 1044:WP:LISTCRUFT 1028: 987: 939: 927:74.70.171.36 919: 910: 883: 870: 861:Steven Tyler 850: 846: 832: 830: 810: 806: 802: 798: 796: 770: 700: 688: 665: 443: 414: 385: 370: 361: 323: 308: 277: 242: 239: 236: 233: 230:RfC Response 219: 210: 174:good article 172: 171: 167: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 2005:August 2016 1755:18.189.4.93 1635:Broken link 1483:skylights76 1266:—Preceding 1238:—Preceding 1148:—Preceding 892:69.2.54.228 833:six packing 817:<_< - 773:—Preceding 668:—Preceding 358:Dot Dot Dot 282:Herostratus 216:Delisted GA 188:renominated 2174:Categories 1598:West Coast 1428:Protection 1314:Variations 1204:T.o.anon84 1194:T.o.anon84 1179:Antimatter 936:List cruft 916:Matt Hardy 803:delivering 799:displaying 779:67.173.2.9 743:Counterfit 411:Censorship 338:WikiGnome 30:Stub-class 2155:Steel1943 2050:Hawkeye75 2019:Hawkeye75 2015:WP:RSSELF 1973:Hawkeye75 1941:Hawkeye75 1898:Cheers. — 1892:this tool 1885:this tool 1743:And again 1738:And again 1615:The Thumb 1526:synthesis 1472:Etymology 1078:Relevance 942:listcruft 880:"shocker" 865:Aerosmith 610:tregoweth 475:tregoweth 316:Tomsteele 299:Tomsteele 184:please do 2113:contribs 2097:contribs 1808:cbignore 1751:unsigned 1561:itsJamie 1512:itsJamie 1441:itsJamie 1364:itsJamie 1325:707l7r57 1268:unsigned 1252:contribs 1244:Domn8r59 1240:unsigned 1150:unsigned 1008:Cheers! 984:The List 888:unsigned 872:MikeSims 775:unsigned 670:unsigned 278:actually 2064:WP:PROD 1908::Online 1837:checked 1802:my edit 1691:Jimw338 1540:Arcayne 1410:Jimw338 1296:Paskari 1168:Origins 1121:hmwith 1032:Llamabr 991:Llamabr 954:Bkkbrad 754:did to 654:Kerkyra 382:Picture 340:Jimw338 139:on the 2088:WP:IRS 2068:WP:AFD 2046:WP:IRS 1816:nobots 1622:Mtkoan 1572:Done. 1385:Sladen 1220:нмŵוτн 1059:hmwith 1013:hmwith 967:hmwith 816:_: --> 756:Elaine 729:Canaen 402:Gbleem 222:slambo 170:was a 36:scale. 2108:James 2092:James 1533:every 1202:A-Rod 1177:way). 1174:Tried 1042:It's 752:Puddy 632:EWS23 541:EWS23 487:EWS23 388:EWS23 364:ChewT 244:EWS23 2162:talk 2054:talk 2023:talk 1977:talk 1945:talk 1937:this 1841:true 1780:talk 1759:talk 1695:talk 1678:talk 1649:talk 1626:talk 1606:talk 1578:talk 1559:OhNo 1510:OhNo 1487:talk 1462:talk 1439:OhNo 1414:talk 1389:talk 1362:OhNo 1338:Bush 1329:talk 1300:talk 1276:talk 1248:talk 1185:--- 1183:talk 1158:talk 1126:talk 1064:talk 1050:and 1018:talk 989:how. 972:talk 952:. -- 948:and 896:talk 783:talk 703:be? 678:talk 344:talk 259:Indy 2075:fan 2066:or 2037:fan 1990:fan 1959:fan 1954:-- 1927:fan 1866:RfC 1828:to 1674:M-1 1181:--- 863:of 855:'s 851:At 819:Dan 701:not 131:Low 2176:: 2164:) 2116:) 2110:(/ 2100:) 2094:(/ 2072:GB 2056:) 2034:GB 2025:) 1987:GB 1979:) 1971:. 1956:GB 1947:) 1924:GB 1879:. 1874:}} 1870:{{ 1814:{{ 1810:}} 1806:{{ 1782:) 1761:) 1697:) 1680:) 1651:) 1628:) 1608:) 1580:) 1547:() 1489:) 1464:) 1416:) 1391:) 1331:) 1302:) 1278:) 1254:) 1250:• 1160:) 898:) 859:, 785:) 758:? 634:| 543:| 489:| 390:| 346:) 246:| 199:). 2160:( 2052:( 2021:( 1975:( 1943:( 1894:. 1887:. 1778:( 1757:( 1693:( 1676:( 1647:( 1624:( 1604:( 1576:( 1485:( 1481:- 1460:( 1412:( 1387:( 1327:( 1298:( 1274:( 1246:( 1225:τ 1156:( 902:. 894:( 781:( 676:( 579:s 576:O 573:d 570:e 567:J 517:s 514:O 511:d 508:e 505:J 459:s 456:O 453:d 450:e 447:J 431:s 428:O 425:d 422:e 419:J 342:( 190:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Sexology and sexuality
WikiProject icon
icon
Human sexuality portal
WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
human sexuality
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
good article
good article criteria
please do
renominated
Reviewed version
slambo
10:32, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
EWS23
(Leave me a message!)
03:44, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Indy
23:14, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Herostratus
20:17, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Tomsteele
07:48, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Tomsteele

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.