Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Significance (magazine)

Source đź“ť

176: 155: 22: 74: 53: 252:: "Beginning with the September 2010 issue, the ASA and Royal Statistical Society (RSS) will collaborate on the publication of Significance, the magazine RSS established in 2004. This partnership is the realization of a dream held by both societies for an international outreach publication that will enhance both organizations and the statistics profession." 266:
Hello. Yes the partnership saw the first joint-issue with September 2010 issue and a new website. The magazine now has two editorial boards, one American-led and the other UK-led and they meet regularly to discuss strategy, ideas for articles, author-sourcing etc. The magazine goes out to all members
345:
may be closely connected to the RSS (as in employed by). This need not be, and doesn't appear to be, a problem here, as the article is OK. But I think that formallly we need a brief statement on this talk page stating this (or contradicting it), purely as a piece of information for other editors. I
320:
Actually, what the article says is this - "Significance, established in 2004, is a magazine published quarterly by the Royal Statistical Society ..." so what you wrote above is relevant only to your own comments on the discussion page. The point is that the article (not the discussion page) needs a
308:
Forgive me, I'm not getting your point - the magazine is 'published' by Wiley's but the content and editing of the magazine is done jointly by both the ASA and the RSS - that's why I stated the text that says 'the ASA and Royal Statistical Society (RSS) will collaborate on the publication of
292:
Still the article says nothing about the joint publication by the two societies. It says that it is a journal of RSS (only). Would someone like to revise the first paragraph to make it reflect the current status? (That is the point ...)
309:
Significance' - it carries both logos for each society and has two editorial boards etc etc. In that same sentence from the link above it only says 'the magazine RSS established in 2004' not that it is a Journal of the RSS. ] (
346:
certainly don't think the article is overstating the merits of the journal/magazine. On a different topic, it would be good if editors could make use of the edit-descriptor line, rather than leaving it blank.
226: 321:
clarification. The journal is jointly published by the two societies through Wiley. Both societies share in the cost of publication as well as the editorial function.
135: 124: 389: 216: 374: 114: 394: 384: 192: 379: 90: 369: 183: 160: 81: 58: 33: 283: 267:
of both Societies but the aim is to get it beyond the subscriber list. (braxxa 16:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC))
39: 21: 271: 191:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
175: 154: 342: 275: 351: 310: 279: 326: 298: 257: 363: 347: 355: 330: 314: 302: 261: 249: 322: 294: 253: 188: 73: 52: 86: 15: 187:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 8: 19: 149: 47: 140:for tips on how to improve this article. 151: 49: 201:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Statistics 99:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Magazines 7: 181:This article is within the scope of 136:WikiProject Magazines' writing guide 79:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 390:Low-importance Statistics articles 14: 375:Low-importance magazine articles 174: 153: 72: 51: 20: 395:WikiProject Statistics articles 385:Start-Class Statistics articles 221:This article has been rated as 204:Template:WikiProject Statistics 119:This article has been rated as 380:WikiProject Magazines articles 102:Template:WikiProject Magazines 1: 370:Start-Class magazine articles 356:12:11, 30 November 2010 (UTC) 331:23:51, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 315:14:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 195:and see a list of open tasks. 93:and see a list of open tasks. 303:23:53, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 262:15:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 411: 125:project's importance scale 220: 169: 131: 118: 67: 46: 248:From the ASA web page 184:WikiProject Statistics 28:This article is rated 82:WikiProject Magazines 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 207:Statistics articles 34:content assessment 288: 274:comment added by 241: 240: 237: 236: 233: 232: 148: 147: 144: 143: 105:magazine articles 402: 287: 268: 227:importance scale 209: 208: 205: 202: 199: 178: 171: 170: 165: 157: 150: 107: 106: 103: 100: 97: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 410: 409: 405: 404: 403: 401: 400: 399: 360: 359: 341:It seems that 339: 269: 246: 206: 203: 200: 197: 196: 163: 104: 101: 98: 95: 94: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 408: 406: 398: 397: 392: 387: 382: 377: 372: 362: 361: 338: 335: 334: 333: 306: 305: 245: 242: 239: 238: 235: 234: 231: 230: 223:Low-importance 219: 213: 212: 210: 193:the discussion 179: 167: 166: 164:Low‑importance 158: 146: 145: 142: 141: 129: 128: 121:Low-importance 117: 111: 110: 108: 91:the discussion 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 407: 396: 393: 391: 388: 386: 383: 381: 378: 376: 373: 371: 368: 367: 365: 358: 357: 353: 349: 344: 336: 332: 328: 324: 319: 318: 317: 316: 312: 304: 300: 296: 291: 290: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 264: 263: 259: 255: 251: 243: 228: 224: 218: 215: 214: 211: 194: 190: 186: 185: 180: 177: 173: 172: 168: 162: 159: 156: 152: 139: 138: 137: 130: 126: 122: 116: 113: 112: 109: 92: 88: 84: 83: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 340: 307: 265: 250:Significance 247: 222: 182: 134: 133: 120: 80: 40:WikiProjects 270:—Preceding 30:Start-class 364:Categories 198:Statistics 189:statistics 161:Statistics 96:Magazines 87:magazines 59:Magazines 348:Melcombe 284:contribs 272:unsigned 343:Abdelhk 311:Abdelhk 276:Abdelhk 225:on the 123:on the 36:scale. 337:COI ? 323:Run54 295:Run54 254:Run54 352:talk 327:talk 299:talk 280:talk 258:talk 132:See 244:ASA 217:Low 115:Low 366:: 354:) 329:) 313:) 301:) 286:) 282:• 260:) 350:( 325:( 297:( 278:( 256:( 229:. 127:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Magazines
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Magazines
magazines
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject Magazines' writing guide
WikiProject icon
Statistics
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Statistics
statistics
the discussion
Low
importance scale
Significance
Run54
talk
15:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
Abdelhk
talk
contribs
Run54
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑