Knowledge

Talk:Singular integral

Source đź“ť

84: 74: 53: 22: 223:. This may even deserve a direct comment. It is not used, for example, in any of the reference works cited on the subject. I was just trying to keep the standard terminology. Kernel function is acceptable. Springer's choice of "Kernel of an integral operator" I feel is great. The lead could use a little work, just trying to help. 174:
uses the term "Kernel of an integral operator". I strongly feel that some initial context-setting is needed before the term kernel is simply tossed out there in the lead. Prefacing it with "integral" is one way to do this, albeit an imperfect one.
196:
I have worked over the second and third sentence of the lead a bit to try to make it less awkward. It's still awkward, which probably means it needs to be rewritten, but I think it is an improvement nonetheless.
140: 251:) theorem. For one thing, we define coercive and use accretive. Also I seem to recall the paper we reference proves a more general theorem using para-accretive functions and requiring 166:'s edit summary, both terms are used. In fact, unless it is clear from context, the term "integral kernel" should be preferred because of possible confusion with the unrelated term 219:
I didn't mean to offend. I do not recall having encountered the phrase "integral kernel." I agree it should be made very clear that it is a distinct concept from
362: 130: 106: 357: 293: 97: 58: 33: 297: 204: 182: 39: 83: 289: 286:
What is going on with this business of a normalised bump of radius 10? Where did the 10 come from?
220: 167: 21: 338: 312: 272: 228: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89: 73: 52: 198: 176: 307:
There is nothing specific about 10. If I am not mistaken any absolute constant will do.
334: 308: 268: 224: 163: 351: 102: 326:
The link to BMO actually links to the Bank of Montreal. It needs some fixing!
79: 342: 316: 301: 276: 232: 212: 190: 267:) to be functions in BMO. I will have to check this out a bit later. 15: 333:
Thanks Jose! I have changed it to point to the correct place
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 243:There is something fishy about the statement of 8: 47: 49: 19: 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 363:High-priority mathematics articles 14: 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 135:This article has been rated as 277:11:19, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 109:and see a list of open tasks. 358:C-Class mathematics articles 317:09:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 302:05:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 172:Encyclopedia of Mathematics 158:Kernels or integral kernels 379: 213:19:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 191:19:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 343:12:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 141:project's priority scale 233:03:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 98:WikiProject Mathematics 28:This article is rated 221:kernel (mathematics) 168:kernel (mathematics) 121:mathematics articles 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 292:comment added by 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 370: 304: 209: 208: 201: 187: 186: 179: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 378: 377: 373: 372: 371: 369: 368: 367: 348: 347: 324: 287: 284: 241: 206: 205: 199: 184: 183: 177: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 376: 374: 366: 365: 360: 350: 349: 346: 345: 323: 320: 283: 280: 240: 237: 236: 235: 216: 215: 170:. Springer's 164:User:Thenub314 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 375: 364: 361: 359: 356: 355: 353: 344: 340: 336: 332: 331: 330: 327: 321: 319: 318: 314: 310: 305: 303: 299: 295: 294:76.210.76.193 291: 281: 279: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 239:T(b) theorem. 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 217: 214: 210: 202: 195: 194: 193: 192: 188: 180: 173: 169: 165: 157: 142: 138: 137:High-priority 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 62:High‑priority 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 328: 325: 306: 285: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 242: 200:silly rabbit 178:silly rabbit 171: 161: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 288:—Preceding 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 352:Categories 329:Jose Brox 282:Radius 10? 335:Thenub314 309:Thenub314 269:Thenub314 225:Thenub314 290:unsigned 162:Despite 139:on the 30:C-class 259:) and 36:scale. 339:talk 313:talk 298:talk 273:talk 229:talk 207:talk 185:talk 131:High 322:BMO 354:: 341:) 315:) 300:) 275:) 231:) 211:) 189:) 337:( 311:( 296:( 271:( 265:b 263:( 261:T 257:b 255:( 253:T 249:b 247:( 245:T 227:( 203:( 181:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
High
project's priority scale
User:Thenub314
kernel (mathematics)
silly rabbit
talk
19:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
silly rabbit
talk
19:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
kernel (mathematics)
Thenub314
talk
03:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Thenub314
talk
11:19, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
unsigned
76.210.76.193

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑