74:
53:
84:
22:
315:
Please accept my apology for that revert. Sometimes, when you can spend just a few seconds on evaluating a revision and you evaluate hundreds of revisions in a row, mistakes happen. Thanks for your contributions! I am sorry you had to take your time to explain this situation. Ad
Orientem, thank you
250:
The template does not say discussion is needed. It states “clean up” and “lead too long”. So, I trimmed everything that was not related to the article, unsourced and most importantly, the
English written here is not even acceptable for primary school, let alone an encyclopedia. I have no issue, if
224:
I haven't reversed any edits. While you may have a good case for redacting uncited claims, in the case of large scale redactions you should open a discussion on the talk page first as these kinds of actions tend to get quick attention from various patrollers of recent edits. See also
265:
After looking at the redacted material in more depth, I think you are on solid ground here. I have removed the warning from your talk page. The redaction looks good to me and should not be reversed w/o improved referencing at the least.
188:
why are you guys reversing my edits? Even in the template it states the lead is poorly written, unsourced and is too long. Why reverse something that you guys are telling editors to fix? Please explain yourself.
288:
252:
211:
190:
167:
292:
256:
215:
194:
171:
364:
140:
130:
369:
106:
359:
210:
why did you reverse my edit? Did you read my explanation or see the template which states clean up is needed? Or, lede is too long?
310:
97:
58:
229:. That said, if there are controversial claims that are unsourced they can be removed until they are sourced per CITE and V. -
33:
166:, I have explained, the entire lede is very poorly written, and not sourced properly. Why is it being reversed?
251:
there is anything valid there, put it back, with proper grammar and
English acceptable for an encyclopedia.
271:
234:
39:
21:
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
325:
303:
282:
267:
245:
230:
183:
89:
73:
52:
287:
awesome! Thank you so much for understanding. I was just trying to help. Thanks again!
353:
226:
317:
205:
79:
102:
332:
296:
275:
260:
238:
219:
198:
175:
15:
316:
for removing warnings from the user's talk page. Best,
163:
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
8:
47:
49:
19:
311:2600:1001:B008:A8F9:4AB:F3FD:9FBF:F628
289:2600:1001:B008:A8F9:4AB:F3FD:9FBF:F628
253:2600:1001:B008:A8F9:4AB:F3FD:9FBF:F628
212:2600:1001:B008:A8F9:4AB:F3FD:9FBF:F628
191:2600:1001:B008:A8F9:4AB:F3FD:9FBF:F628
168:2600:1001:B008:A8F9:4AB:F3FD:9FBF:F628
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
365:Top-importance Sri Lanka articles
82:
72:
51:
20:
135:This article has been rated as
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Sri Lanka
370:WikiProject Sri Lanka articles
118:Template:WikiProject Sri Lanka
1:
333:23:19, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
297:20:43, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
276:20:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
261:20:36, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
239:20:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
220:20:22, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
199:20:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
176:20:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
162:Hello, people keep reversing
109:and see a list of open tasks.
386:
360:C-Class Sri Lanka articles
328:Do you have any questions?
141:project's importance scale
134:
67:
46:
28:This article is rated
98:WikiProject Sri Lanka
121:Sri Lanka articles
34:content assessment
330:
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
377:
329:
326:
323:
320:
314:
307:
286:
249:
209:
187:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
90:Sri Lanka portal
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
385:
384:
380:
379:
378:
376:
375:
374:
350:
349:
327:
321:
318:
308:
301:
280:
243:
203:
181:
160:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
383:
381:
373:
372:
367:
362:
352:
351:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
159:
156:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Top-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Top‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
382:
371:
368:
366:
363:
361:
358:
357:
355:
334:
331:
324:
312:
305:
300:
299:
298:
294:
290:
284:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
264:
263:
262:
258:
254:
247:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
222:
221:
217:
213:
207:
202:
201:
200:
196:
192:
185:
180:
179:
178:
177:
173:
169:
165:
157:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
161:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
304:Ad Orientem
283:Ad Orientem
268:Ad Orientem
246:Ad Orientem
231:Ad Orientem
184:Ad Orientem
354:Categories
158:Reversals
112:Sri Lanka
103:Sri Lanka
59:Sri Lanka
206:Tymon.r
139:on the
30:C-class
319:Tymon.
227:WP:BRD
36:scale.
293:talk
272:talk
257:talk
235:talk
216:talk
195:talk
172:talk
164:here
131:Top
356::
295:)
274:)
259:)
237:)
218:)
197:)
174:)
322:r
313::
309:@
306::
302:@
291:(
285::
281:@
270:(
266:-
255:(
248::
244:@
233:(
214:(
208::
204:@
193:(
186::
182:@
170:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
