860:
end. The argument that the current title is actually more common for this topic is not refuted. Some feel there is consistent naming convention applicable here with which the proposed title is consistent, but there is no consensus about the existence of such a convention, much less that the consistency should outweigh the common name. While the population in general may be more apt to recognize the proposed title, the scope of RECOGNIZABILITY is the subset of the population "that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize". So, with due respect, that argument must be discounted accordingly. The consensus here is clearly to stay put. I must say it is disappointing to see a repeat proposal so soon, especially with nothing new to present.
268:
247:
676:. Currently, this page is literally one of the ONLY Bilateral Relations page that doesn't follow the established pattern of the other Bilateral Relations page titles. (And secondly, it's not the relations between "those who are Chinese" and "those who are Soviet", it's about the relations between the countries of China and the Soviet Union themselves.) (And thirdly, if this page ISN'T being moved to the proposed title, it would open up a messy can of worms of page moves trying to put things in this bizarre format, which gets even messier for the countries without widely-known demonyms.)
173:
468:
1154:. Don't see why an Rfc would be needed when the IR project has pretty much settled on the naming of such articles. There hasn't been a backlash to the naming of other articles like this. If Sino was appropriate then the article should be Sino-United States relations and not Chian-United States relations. There won't be enough who would support that considering the massive wormhole it would open up. Not to mention the constant change it would require for navboxes and categories created for bilateral relations articles. --
882:– The names of the countries are China and Soviet Union. Not Sino or Soviet. Demonyms should not be used to title the article about the relationship between the governments that conduct the affairs of foreign relations. Any search results that use the current title in regard to articles on the web or scholarly sources don't factor in the name of the article because we use common names of countries. The common name of both countries is China and Soviet Union, respectively.
163:
142:
278:
740:
379:
352:
389:
22:
74:
53:
743:, and you'll get a lot of titles insisting on "Sino-Soviet" ("Sino-Soviet Relations", "Sino-Soviet Rivalry", "Sino-Soviet Split", "Sino-Soviet Alliance", "Sino-Soviet Dispute", "Sino-Soviet Competition", "Sino-Soviet Dialogue", "Sino-Soviet Friendship", etc.), and practically no titles using the phrase "China-Soviet".
1089:
Support moving the article to the proposed title. I don't get how anyone can say this is the proper title as others pointed out over the naming for relations articles. If the name of the categories has China and Soviet Union, then the name of the article should also reflect the categorization of such
1033:
Then all bilateral relations articles titles should be changed based on this logic. Then it would mean Soviet Union–United States relations should be changed to Soviet-American relations because Soviet and
American is the way to describe the relations. My explanation in the nomination reflects the
859:
Again. While the common names of the two countries in question are of course China and the Soviet Union respectively, the issue here is what is the common name of the title of this article's subject, which is not necessarily a simple mashup of the two country names and "relations" slapped onto the
1199:
So if the historical relations is the major concern, does that mean all bilateral articles for East
Germany, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, and Soviet Union should be changed to something like this? And relations that are "former" still have this form of article titles. For instance, Taiwan-related
579:– The last of such bilateral relations articles that uses the demonyms rather than the names of the countries. Sino and Soviet are not the names of the countries. It's China and Soviet Union. Had it changed at RM, but was changed over there back to Sino-Soviet since it needs a discussion.
777:: Consensus balanced about whether Sino-Soviet should be prefered because of common use among experts and consistency over other China/Soviet Union relation pages or whether China-Soviet Union should be prefered because of consistency over other countries bilateral relations.
1149:
There is consistency for bilateral relations articles. Take a look at all the other bilateral relations articles. And the Sino in other article titles has no bearing on this discussion. There was a discussion about this back from
January to February on
1034:
standard for bilateral relations articles. There seems to be some sort of contingency that belives some disaster is going to take place if it changes to the right name. Similar to the Greece-Turkey relations article move discussion. --
943:: The nominator proposed exactly the same move just a few months ago, and the result was "not moved". Has anything changed since then? This is a historical topic, so it's unlikely that common usage has changed so quickly. —
1180:
bilateral relations, have at it. But it is a bad precedent to demand it for historical relations, even in cases like this one where it is at least possible. There is no way "China–Roman Empire relations" is better than
736:
651:. Changing Sino-Roman wouldn't apply because that covers a wide range of historical relations of a historical period. This covers Rome's relations with many different Chinese states. Not just one. --
1004:
Sino-Soviet is clearly the standard and usual term used to describe relations between China and the Soviet Union. To advocate otherwise is like complaining that an irregular verb is irregular. —
1151:
1260:
477:
362:
1240:
124:
114:
1245:
90:
1235:
1295:
915:
1255:
219:
1305:
1275:
324:
544:
Participants are too split between which articles to be consistent with to decide on that ground. But Sino-Soviet seems to be favoured on common name grounds. —
987:
The nomination is sound. I don't think anybody refers to this article has having to do with Sino and Soviet culture which is what those terms tend to be for. --
732:
334:
81:
58:
1300:
1280:
648:
701:
621:, but should be Sino-Soviet with a hyphen. No need to enforce consistency designed for existing states on historical ones, else we might have to move
919:
724:
1290:
719:. The term "Sino-Soviet" is very commonly used in discussing relations between these two countries, to merit an exception to the general rule, e.g.
448:
1250:
458:
300:
1270:
501:
229:
644:
911:
1201:
1310:
846:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
531:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1265:
1091:
988:
291:
252:
954:
424:
1285:
195:
1204:. It's going to be very hard for an Rfc to convince the IR project that former relations should be changed to something else. --
728:
267:
246:
1020:
560:
824:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
706:
420:
402:
357:
33:
739:, etc. The proposed phrase would actually be awkward and anomalous in the literature. Put in "China-Soviet Union" in
186:
147:
907:
194:
related articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1176:
As I said in the last RM, there is no need to force consistency across time. If you want absolute consistency for
570:
837:
522:
1209:
1159:
1039:
887:
810:
696:
656:
584:
1137:
467:
86:
1129:
1095:
992:
1128:
I agree there is no consistency. There are quite a few articles with "sino" in the title like
History of
504:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
299:(USSR) on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1111:
on future RMs. The approach of the nominator appears to be to wear out supporters by repeated voting.
948:
873:
847:
532:
407:
39:
1182:
903:
864:
673:
622:
21:
1205:
1155:
1035:
883:
850:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
806:
748:
682:
652:
580:
535:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
283:
89:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1116:
1059:
are recognizability and naturalness, and readers are much more likely to recognize or search for
1056:
1015:
555:
765:
720:
162:
141:
1076:
944:
788:
605:
1190:
1133:
975:
927:
861:
630:
744:
678:
1229:
1112:
1010:
550:
505:
394:
761:
296:
178:
378:
351:
1213:
1194:
1163:
1140:
1120:
1099:
1081:
1073:
1043:
1024:
996:
979:
958:
931:
891:
867:
814:
794:
782:
769:
752:
711:
687:
660:
634:
611:
599:
564:
508:
1186:
971:
923:
626:
384:
273:
168:
643:
The same MOS exists for countries' relations that no longer exist such as
1067:, and also gives consistency with many other article titles that use
411:
419:
Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
1107:
per arguments in previous RM (i.e. that the sources use this) and
191:
1136:. We need a wider discussion/RfC to address this. —usernamekiran
737:
Sino-Soviet Treaty of
Friendship, Alliance and Mutual Assistance
73:
52:
15:
805:
the IR project. Could use their input for this discussion. --
466:
1152:
Knowledge talk:Naming conventions (country-specific topics)
760:. The term "Sino-Soviet" is very commonly used by experts.
295:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
878:
802:
575:
190:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1261:C-Class China-related articles of High-importance
916:Category:Bilateral relations of the Soviet Union
1241:Mid-importance International relations articles
733:Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance
99:Knowledge:WikiProject International relations
8:
1246:WikiProject International relations articles
102:Template:WikiProject International relations
836:The following is a closed discussion of a
521:The following is a closed discussion of a
500:There is a move discussion in progress on
346:
241:
136:
47:
1236:C-Class International relations articles
1296:High-importance C-Class Russia articles
348:
243:
138:
49:
19:
1256:High-importance China-related articles
502:Talk:Sino-Russian relations since 1991
1306:History of Russia task force articles
1276:High-importance Soviet Union articles
912:Category:Bilateral relations of China
649:Czechoslovakia–East Germany relations
7:
920:Soviet Union–United States relations
910:and virtually all other articles of
902:. This change would make this title
855:The result of the move request was:
725:Sino-Soviet relations from 1969–1991
540:The result of the move request was:
400:This article is within the scope of
289:This article is within the scope of
184:This article is within the scope of
79:This article is within the scope of
297:Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
82:WikiProject International relations
38:It is of interest to the following
309:Knowledge:WikiProject Soviet Union
14:
1301:C-Class Russia (history) articles
1281:WikiProject Soviet Union articles
645:Soviet Union–Yugoslavia relations
312:Template:WikiProject Soviet Union
1202:Solomon Islands–Taiwan relations
820:The discussion above is closed.
478:the history of Russia task force
387:
377:
350:
276:
266:
245:
171:
161:
140:
105:International relations articles
72:
51:
20:
1291:High-importance Russia articles
729:Sino-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact
453:This article has been rated as
329:This article has been rated as
224:This article has been rated as
119:This article has been rated as
1251:C-Class China-related articles
829:Requested move 19 October 2022
1:
1271:C-Class Soviet Union articles
475:This article is supported by
303:and see a list of open tasks.
198:and see a list of open tasks.
93:and see a list of open tasks.
1214:23:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
1200:bilateral articles. Such as
1195:22:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
1164:22:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
1141:09:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
1121:01:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
1100:01:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
1082:18:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
1044:17:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
1025:16:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
997:13:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
980:20:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
959:08:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
932:21:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
892:21:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
879:China–Soviet Union relations
868:06:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
587:) 00:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
576:China–Soviet Union relations
433:Knowledge:WikiProject Russia
1311:WikiProject Russia articles
1006:Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung
546:Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung
514:Requested move 30 June 2022
496:Move discussion in progress
436:Template:WikiProject Russia
204:Knowledge:WikiProject China
1327:
1266:WikiProject China articles
509:15:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
459:project's importance scale
335:project's importance scale
230:project's importance scale
207:Template:WikiProject China
125:project's importance scale
815:17:25, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
712:08:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
688:02:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
661:01:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
635:01:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
565:17:12, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
474:
452:
410:dedicated to coverage of
372:
328:
261:
223:
156:
118:
67:
46:
843:Please do not modify it.
822:Please do not modify it.
795:08:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
770:09:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
753:06:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
612:08:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
528:Please do not modify it.
292:WikiProject Soviet Union
1286:C-Class Russia articles
423:, or contribute to the
96:International relations
87:International relations
59:International relations
1130:Sino-Russian relations
908:China–Russia relations
471:
210:China-related articles
28:This article is rated
874:Sino-Soviet relations
571:Sino–Soviet relations
470:
315:Soviet Union articles
1183:Sino-Roman relations
970:. We just did this.
623:Sino-Roman relations
1109:one-year moratorium
695:per WP:CONSISTENT.
284:Soviet Union portal
670:Support (STRONGLY)
472:
425:project discussion
403:WikiProject Russia
34:content assessment
758:Oppose (strongly)
721:Sino-Soviet split
717:Oppose (strongly)
686:
614:
493:
492:
489:
488:
485:
484:
345:
344:
341:
340:
240:
239:
236:
235:
187:WikiProject China
135:
134:
131:
130:
1318:
881:
845:
793:
791:
785:
709:
704:
699:
677:
610:
608:
602:
588:
578:
530:
441:
440:
437:
434:
431:
397:
392:
391:
390:
381:
374:
373:
368:
365:
354:
347:
317:
316:
313:
310:
307:
286:
281:
280:
279:
270:
263:
262:
257:
249:
242:
212:
211:
208:
205:
202:
181:
176:
175:
174:
165:
158:
157:
152:
144:
137:
107:
106:
103:
100:
97:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1134:Sino-Indian War
877:
841:
831:
826:
825:
789:
783:
778:
775:Relister's note
707:
702:
697:
679:Paintspot Infez
606:
600:
595:
574:
526:
516:
498:
455:High-importance
439:Russia articles
438:
435:
432:
429:
428:
417:To participate:
393:
388:
386:
367:High‑importance
366:
360:
331:High-importance
314:
311:
308:
305:
304:
282:
277:
275:
256:High‑importance
255:
226:High-importance
209:
206:
203:
200:
199:
177:
172:
170:
151:High‑importance
150:
104:
101:
98:
95:
94:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1324:
1322:
1314:
1313:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1206:WikiCleanerMan
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1156:WikiCleanerMan
1144:
1143:
1123:
1102:
1084:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1036:WikiCleanerMan
1028:
1027:
999:
982:
961:
937:
936:
935:
934:
884:WikiCleanerMan
871:
853:
852:
838:requested move
832:
830:
827:
819:
818:
817:
807:WikiCleanerMan
797:
772:
755:
714:
690:
666:
665:
664:
663:
653:WikiCleanerMan
638:
637:
581:WikiCleanerMan
568:
538:
537:
523:requested move
517:
515:
512:
497:
494:
491:
490:
487:
486:
483:
482:
473:
463:
462:
451:
445:
444:
442:
415:
414:on Knowledge.
399:
398:
382:
370:
369:
355:
343:
342:
339:
338:
327:
321:
320:
318:
301:the discussion
288:
287:
271:
259:
258:
250:
238:
237:
234:
233:
222:
216:
215:
213:
196:the discussion
183:
182:
166:
154:
153:
145:
133:
132:
129:
128:
121:Mid-importance
117:
111:
110:
108:
91:the discussion
77:
65:
64:
62:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1323:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1304:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1272:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1231:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1179:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1088:
1085:
1083:
1080:
1078:
1075:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1051:
1050:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1012:
1007:
1003:
1000:
998:
994:
990:
986:
983:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
962:
960:
956:
953:
950:
946:
942:
939:
938:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
904:WP:CONSISTENT
901:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
889:
885:
880:
875:
870:
869:
866:
863:
858:
851:
849:
844:
839:
834:
833:
828:
823:
816:
812:
808:
804:
801:
798:
796:
792:
786:
776:
773:
771:
767:
763:
759:
756:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
715:
713:
710:
705:
700:
694:
691:
689:
684:
680:
675:
674:WP:CONSISTENT
671:
668:
667:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
641:
640:
639:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
617:
616:
615:
613:
609:
603:
594:
593:
586:
582:
577:
572:
567:
566:
562:
558:
557:
553:
552:
547:
543:
536:
534:
529:
524:
519:
518:
513:
511:
510:
507:
503:
495:
480:
479:
469:
465:
464:
460:
456:
450:
447:
446:
443:
426:
422:
418:
413:
409:
405:
404:
396:
395:Russia portal
385:
383:
380:
376:
375:
371:
364:
359:
356:
353:
349:
336:
332:
326:
323:
322:
319:
302:
298:
294:
293:
285:
274:
272:
269:
265:
264:
260:
254:
251:
248:
244:
231:
227:
221:
218:
217:
214:
197:
193:
189:
188:
180:
169:
167:
164:
160:
159:
155:
149:
146:
143:
139:
126:
122:
116:
113:
112:
109:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1177:
1125:
1108:
1104:
1092:72.229.44.69
1090:articles. --
1086:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1052:
1014:
1009:
1005:
1001:
989:70.23.37.163
984:
968:speedy close
967:
963:
951:
940:
899:
872:
856:
854:
842:
835:
821:
799:
774:
757:
716:
692:
669:
618:
591:
590:
569:
554:
549:
545:
541:
539:
527:
520:
499:
476:
454:
421:project page
416:
401:
330:
306:Soviet Union
290:
253:Soviet Union
225:
185:
179:China portal
120:
80:
40:WikiProjects
1057:WP:CRITERIA
945:Mx. Granger
848:move review
533:move review
408:WikiProject
1230:Categories
918:, such as
857:Not moved.
592:Relisting.
542:Not moved.
745:Walrasiad
1113:SnowFire
1055:The top
955:contribs
803:Notified
506:RMCD bot
1178:current
1087:Support
1074:Michael
1053:Support
941:Comment
900:Support
800:Comment
762:Rjensen
693:Support
457:on the
363:History
333:on the
228:on the
123:on the
30:C-class
1138:(talk)
1126:oppose
1105:Oppose
1002:Oppose
964:Oppose
784:Extorc
741:Gbooks
619:Oppose
601:Extorc
430:Russia
412:Russia
358:Russia
36:scale.
1187:Srnec
1069:China
1065:Sino-
1063:than
1061:China
1011:mello
972:Srnec
924:Pilaz
906:with
781:: -->
780:: -->
779:: -->
698:Super
627:Srnec
598:: -->
597:: -->
596:: -->
551:mello
201:China
192:China
148:China
1210:talk
1191:talk
1160:talk
1117:talk
1096:talk
1040:talk
993:talk
985:Move
976:talk
966:and
949:talk
928:talk
914:and
888:talk
811:talk
790:talk
766:talk
749:talk
683:talk
672:per
657:talk
631:talk
607:talk
585:talk
449:High
406:, a
325:High
220:High
1185:. —
1071:. —
1016:hi!
862:В²C
708:Dro
556:hi!
115:Mid
1232::
1212:)
1193:)
1162:)
1132:,
1119:)
1098:)
1042:)
1023:)
1021:投稿
1008:,
995:)
978:)
957:)
930:)
922:.
890:)
876:→
840:.
813:)
768:)
751:)
735:,
731:,
727:,
723:,
659:)
647:,
633:)
625:.
589:—
573:→
563:)
561:投稿
548:,
525:.
361::
1208:(
1189:(
1158:(
1115:(
1094:(
1079:.
1077:Z
1038:(
1019:(
991:(
974:(
952:·
947:(
926:(
886:(
865:☎
809:(
787:.
764:(
747:(
703:Ψ
685:)
681:(
655:(
629:(
604:.
583:(
559:(
481:.
461:.
427:.
337:.
232:.
127:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
