871:
end. The argument that the current title is actually more common for this topic is not refuted. Some feel there is consistent naming convention applicable here with which the proposed title is consistent, but there is no consensus about the existence of such a convention, much less that the consistency should outweigh the common name. While the population in general may be more apt to recognize the proposed title, the scope of RECOGNIZABILITY is the subset of the population "that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize". So, with due respect, that argument must be discounted accordingly. The consensus here is clearly to stay put. I must say it is disappointing to see a repeat proposal so soon, especially with nothing new to present.
279:
258:
687:. Currently, this page is literally one of the ONLY Bilateral Relations page that doesn't follow the established pattern of the other Bilateral Relations page titles. (And secondly, it's not the relations between "those who are Chinese" and "those who are Soviet", it's about the relations between the countries of China and the Soviet Union themselves.) (And thirdly, if this page ISN'T being moved to the proposed title, it would open up a messy can of worms of page moves trying to put things in this bizarre format, which gets even messier for the countries without widely-known demonyms.)
184:
479:
1165:. Don't see why an Rfc would be needed when the IR project has pretty much settled on the naming of such articles. There hasn't been a backlash to the naming of other articles like this. If Sino was appropriate then the article should be Sino-United States relations and not Chian-United States relations. There won't be enough who would support that considering the massive wormhole it would open up. Not to mention the constant change it would require for navboxes and categories created for bilateral relations articles. --
893:– The names of the countries are China and Soviet Union. Not Sino or Soviet. Demonyms should not be used to title the article about the relationship between the governments that conduct the affairs of foreign relations. Any search results that use the current title in regard to articles on the web or scholarly sources don't factor in the name of the article because we use common names of countries. The common name of both countries is China and Soviet Union, respectively.
174:
153:
289:
751:
390:
363:
400:
33:
85:
64:
754:, and you'll get a lot of titles insisting on "Sino-Soviet" ("Sino-Soviet Relations", "Sino-Soviet Rivalry", "Sino-Soviet Split", "Sino-Soviet Alliance", "Sino-Soviet Dispute", "Sino-Soviet Competition", "Sino-Soviet Dialogue", "Sino-Soviet Friendship", etc.), and practically no titles using the phrase "China-Soviet".
1100:
Support moving the article to the proposed title. I don't get how anyone can say this is the proper title as others pointed out over the naming for relations articles. If the name of the categories has China and Soviet Union, then the name of the article should also reflect the categorization of such
1044:
Then all bilateral relations articles titles should be changed based on this logic. Then it would mean Soviet Union–United States relations should be changed to Soviet-American relations because Soviet and
American is the way to describe the relations. My explanation in the nomination reflects the
870:
Again. While the common names of the two countries in question are of course China and the Soviet Union respectively, the issue here is what is the common name of the title of this article's subject, which is not necessarily a simple mashup of the two country names and "relations" slapped onto the
1210:
So if the historical relations is the major concern, does that mean all bilateral articles for East
Germany, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, and Soviet Union should be changed to something like this? And relations that are "former" still have this form of article titles. For instance, Taiwan-related
590:– The last of such bilateral relations articles that uses the demonyms rather than the names of the countries. Sino and Soviet are not the names of the countries. It's China and Soviet Union. Had it changed at RM, but was changed over there back to Sino-Soviet since it needs a discussion.
788:: Consensus balanced about whether Sino-Soviet should be prefered because of common use among experts and consistency over other China/Soviet Union relation pages or whether China-Soviet Union should be prefered because of consistency over other countries bilateral relations.
1160:
There is consistency for bilateral relations articles. Take a look at all the other bilateral relations articles. And the Sino in other article titles has no bearing on this discussion. There was a discussion about this back from
January to February on
1045:
standard for bilateral relations articles. There seems to be some sort of contingency that belives some disaster is going to take place if it changes to the right name. Similar to the Greece-Turkey relations article move discussion. --
954:: The nominator proposed exactly the same move just a few months ago, and the result was "not moved". Has anything changed since then? This is a historical topic, so it's unlikely that common usage has changed so quickly. —
1191:
bilateral relations, have at it. But it is a bad precedent to demand it for historical relations, even in cases like this one where it is at least possible. There is no way "China–Roman Empire relations" is better than
747:
662:. Changing Sino-Roman wouldn't apply because that covers a wide range of historical relations of a historical period. This covers Rome's relations with many different Chinese states. Not just one. --
1015:
Sino-Soviet is clearly the standard and usual term used to describe relations between China and the Soviet Union. To advocate otherwise is like complaining that an irregular verb is irregular. —
1162:
1271:
488:
373:
1251:
135:
125:
1256:
101:
1246:
1306:
926:
1266:
230:
1316:
1286:
335:
555:
Participants are too split between which articles to be consistent with to decide on that ground. But Sino-Soviet seems to be favoured on common name grounds. —
998:
The nomination is sound. I don't think anybody refers to this article has having to do with Sino and Soviet culture which is what those terms tend to be for. --
743:
345:
92:
69:
1311:
1291:
659:
712:
632:, but should be Sino-Soviet with a hyphen. No need to enforce consistency designed for existing states on historical ones, else we might have to move
930:
735:
1301:
730:. The term "Sino-Soviet" is very commonly used in discussing relations between these two countries, to merit an exception to the general rule, e.g.
459:
1261:
469:
311:
1281:
512:
240:
655:
922:
1212:
1321:
857:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
542:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1276:
1102:
999:
302:
263:
965:
435:
1296:
206:
1215:. It's going to be very hard for an Rfc to convince the IR project that former relations should be changed to something else. --
739:
278:
257:
1031:
571:
835:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
717:
431:
413:
368:
44:
750:, etc. The proposed phrase would actually be awkward and anomalous in the literature. Put in "China-Soviet Union" in
197:
158:
918:
205:
related articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1187:
As I said in the last RM, there is no need to force consistency across time. If you want absolute consistency for
581:
848:
533:
1220:
1170:
1050:
898:
821:
707:
667:
595:
1148:
478:
97:
1140:
1106:
1003:
1139:
I agree there is no consistency. There are quite a few articles with "sino" in the title like
History of
515:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
310:(USSR) on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1122:
on future RMs. The approach of the nominator appears to be to wear out supporters by repeated voting.
959:
884:
858:
543:
418:
50:
1193:
914:
875:
684:
633:
32:
1216:
1166:
1046:
894:
861:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
817:
759:
693:
663:
591:
546:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
294:
100:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1127:
1070:
are recognizability and naturalness, and readers are much more likely to recognize or search for
1067:
1026:
566:
776:
731:
173:
152:
1087:
955:
799:
616:
1201:
1144:
986:
938:
872:
641:
17:
755:
689:
1240:
1123:
1021:
561:
516:
405:
772:
307:
189:
389:
362:
1224:
1205:
1174:
1151:
1131:
1110:
1092:
1084:
1054:
1035:
1007:
990:
969:
942:
902:
878:
825:
805:
793:
780:
763:
722:
698:
671:
645:
622:
610:
575:
519:
1197:
982:
934:
637:
395:
284:
179:
654:
The same MOS exists for countries' relations that no longer exist such as
1078:, and also gives consistency with many other article titles that use
422:
430:
Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
1118:
per arguments in previous RM (i.e. that the sources use this) and
202:
1147:. We need a wider discussion/RfC to address this. —usernamekiran
748:
Sino-Soviet Treaty of
Friendship, Alliance and Mutual Assistance
84:
63:
26:
816:
the IR project. Could use their input for this discussion. --
477:
1163:
Knowledge talk:Naming conventions (country-specific topics)
771:. The term "Sino-Soviet" is very commonly used by experts.
306:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
889:
813:
586:
201:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
96:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1272:C-Class China-related articles of High-importance
927:Category:Bilateral relations of the Soviet Union
1252:Mid-importance International relations articles
744:Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance
110:Knowledge:WikiProject International relations
8:
1257:WikiProject International relations articles
113:Template:WikiProject International relations
847:The following is a closed discussion of a
532:The following is a closed discussion of a
511:There is a move discussion in progress on
357:
252:
147:
58:
1247:C-Class International relations articles
1307:High-importance C-Class Russia articles
359:
254:
149:
60:
30:
1267:High-importance China-related articles
513:Talk:Sino-Russian relations since 1991
1317:History of Russia task force articles
1287:High-importance Soviet Union articles
923:Category:Bilateral relations of China
660:Czechoslovakia–East Germany relations
7:
931:Soviet Union–United States relations
921:and virtually all other articles of
913:. This change would make this title
866:The result of the move request was:
736:Sino-Soviet relations from 1969–1991
551:The result of the move request was:
411:This article is within the scope of
300:This article is within the scope of
195:This article is within the scope of
90:This article is within the scope of
308:Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
93:WikiProject International relations
49:It is of interest to the following
320:Knowledge:WikiProject Soviet Union
25:
1312:C-Class Russia (history) articles
1292:WikiProject Soviet Union articles
656:Soviet Union–Yugoslavia relations
323:Template:WikiProject Soviet Union
1213:Solomon Islands–Taiwan relations
831:The discussion above is closed.
489:the history of Russia task force
398:
388:
361:
287:
277:
256:
182:
172:
151:
116:International relations articles
83:
62:
31:
1302:High-importance Russia articles
740:Sino-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact
464:This article has been rated as
340:This article has been rated as
235:This article has been rated as
130:This article has been rated as
1262:C-Class China-related articles
840:Requested move 19 October 2022
1:
1282:C-Class Soviet Union articles
486:This article is supported by
314:and see a list of open tasks.
209:and see a list of open tasks.
104:and see a list of open tasks.
1225:23:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
1211:bilateral articles. Such as
1206:22:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
1175:22:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
1152:09:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
1132:01:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
1111:01:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
1093:18:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
1055:17:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
1036:16:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
1008:13:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
991:20:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
970:08:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
943:21:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
903:21:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
890:China–Soviet Union relations
879:06:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
598:) 00:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
587:China–Soviet Union relations
444:Knowledge:WikiProject Russia
1322:WikiProject Russia articles
1017:Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung
557:Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung
525:Requested move 30 June 2022
507:Move discussion in progress
447:Template:WikiProject Russia
215:Knowledge:WikiProject China
1338:
1277:WikiProject China articles
520:15:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
470:project's importance scale
346:project's importance scale
241:project's importance scale
218:Template:WikiProject China
136:project's importance scale
18:Talk:Sino–Soviet relations
826:17:25, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
723:08:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
699:02:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
672:01:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
646:01:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
576:17:12, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
485:
463:
421:dedicated to coverage of
383:
339:
272:
234:
167:
129:
78:
57:
854:Please do not modify it.
833:Please do not modify it.
806:08:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
781:09:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
764:06:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
623:08:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
539:Please do not modify it.
303:WikiProject Soviet Union
1297:C-Class Russia articles
434:, or contribute to the
107:International relations
98:International relations
70:International relations
1141:Sino-Russian relations
919:China–Russia relations
482:
221:China-related articles
39:This article is rated
885:Sino-Soviet relations
582:Sino–Soviet relations
481:
326:Soviet Union articles
1194:Sino-Roman relations
981:. We just did this.
634:Sino-Roman relations
1120:one-year moratorium
706:per WP:CONSISTENT.
295:Soviet Union portal
681:Support (STRONGLY)
483:
436:project discussion
414:WikiProject Russia
45:content assessment
769:Oppose (strongly)
732:Sino-Soviet split
728:Oppose (strongly)
697:
625:
504:
503:
500:
499:
496:
495:
356:
355:
352:
351:
251:
250:
247:
246:
198:WikiProject China
146:
145:
142:
141:
16:(Redirected from
1329:
892:
856:
804:
802:
796:
720:
715:
710:
688:
621:
619:
613:
599:
589:
541:
452:
451:
448:
445:
442:
408:
403:
402:
401:
392:
385:
384:
379:
376:
365:
358:
328:
327:
324:
321:
318:
297:
292:
291:
290:
281:
274:
273:
268:
260:
253:
223:
222:
219:
216:
213:
192:
187:
186:
185:
176:
169:
168:
163:
155:
148:
118:
117:
114:
111:
108:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1145:Sino-Indian War
888:
852:
842:
837:
836:
800:
794:
789:
786:Relister's note
718:
713:
708:
690:Paintspot Infez
617:
611:
606:
585:
537:
527:
509:
466:High-importance
450:Russia articles
449:
446:
443:
440:
439:
428:To participate:
404:
399:
397:
378:High‑importance
377:
371:
342:High-importance
325:
322:
319:
316:
315:
293:
288:
286:
267:High‑importance
266:
237:High-importance
220:
217:
214:
211:
210:
188:
183:
181:
162:High‑importance
161:
115:
112:
109:
106:
105:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1335:
1333:
1325:
1324:
1319:
1314:
1309:
1304:
1299:
1294:
1289:
1284:
1279:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1259:
1254:
1249:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1217:WikiCleanerMan
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1167:WikiCleanerMan
1155:
1154:
1134:
1113:
1095:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1047:WikiCleanerMan
1039:
1038:
1010:
993:
972:
948:
947:
946:
945:
895:WikiCleanerMan
882:
864:
863:
849:requested move
843:
841:
838:
830:
829:
828:
818:WikiCleanerMan
808:
783:
766:
725:
701:
677:
676:
675:
674:
664:WikiCleanerMan
649:
648:
592:WikiCleanerMan
579:
549:
548:
534:requested move
528:
526:
523:
508:
505:
502:
501:
498:
497:
494:
493:
484:
474:
473:
462:
456:
455:
453:
426:
425:on Knowledge.
410:
409:
393:
381:
380:
366:
354:
353:
350:
349:
338:
332:
331:
329:
312:the discussion
299:
298:
282:
270:
269:
261:
249:
248:
245:
244:
233:
227:
226:
224:
207:the discussion
194:
193:
177:
165:
164:
156:
144:
143:
140:
139:
132:Mid-importance
128:
122:
121:
119:
102:the discussion
88:
76:
75:
73:Mid‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1334:
1323:
1320:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1310:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1293:
1290:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1280:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1268:
1265:
1263:
1260:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1248:
1245:
1244:
1242:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1135:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1086:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1018:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
994:
992:
988:
984:
980:
976:
973:
971:
967:
964:
961:
957:
953:
950:
949:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:WP:CONSISTENT
912:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
900:
896:
891:
886:
881:
880:
877:
874:
869:
862:
860:
855:
850:
845:
844:
839:
834:
827:
823:
819:
815:
812:
809:
807:
803:
797:
787:
784:
782:
778:
774:
770:
767:
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
726:
724:
721:
716:
711:
705:
702:
700:
695:
691:
686:
685:WP:CONSISTENT
682:
679:
678:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
652:
651:
650:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
628:
627:
626:
624:
620:
614:
605:
604:
597:
593:
588:
583:
578:
577:
573:
569:
568:
564:
563:
558:
554:
547:
545:
540:
535:
530:
529:
524:
522:
521:
518:
514:
506:
491:
490:
480:
476:
475:
471:
467:
461:
458:
457:
454:
437:
433:
429:
424:
420:
416:
415:
407:
406:Russia portal
396:
394:
391:
387:
386:
382:
375:
370:
367:
364:
360:
347:
343:
337:
334:
333:
330:
313:
309:
305:
304:
296:
285:
283:
280:
276:
275:
271:
265:
262:
259:
255:
242:
238:
232:
229:
228:
225:
208:
204:
200:
199:
191:
180:
178:
175:
171:
170:
166:
160:
157:
154:
150:
137:
133:
127:
124:
123:
120:
103:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
1188:
1136:
1119:
1115:
1103:72.229.44.69
1101:articles. --
1097:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1063:
1025:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1000:70.23.37.163
995:
979:speedy close
978:
974:
962:
951:
910:
883:
867:
865:
853:
846:
832:
810:
785:
768:
727:
703:
680:
629:
602:
601:
580:
565:
560:
556:
552:
550:
538:
531:
510:
487:
465:
432:project page
427:
412:
341:
317:Soviet Union
301:
264:Soviet Union
236:
196:
190:China portal
131:
91:
51:WikiProjects
1068:WP:CRITERIA
956:Mx. Granger
859:move review
544:move review
419:WikiProject
1241:Categories
929:, such as
868:Not moved.
603:Relisting.
553:Not moved.
756:Walrasiad
1124:SnowFire
1066:The top
966:contribs
814:Notified
517:RMCD bot
1189:current
1098:Support
1085:Michael
1064:Support
952:Comment
911:Support
811:Comment
773:Rjensen
704:Support
468:on the
374:History
344:on the
239:on the
134:on the
41:C-class
1149:(talk)
1137:oppose
1116:Oppose
1013:Oppose
975:Oppose
795:Extorc
752:Gbooks
630:Oppose
612:Extorc
441:Russia
423:Russia
369:Russia
47:scale.
1198:Srnec
1080:China
1076:Sino-
1074:than
1072:China
1022:mello
983:Srnec
935:Pilaz
917:with
792:: -->
791:: -->
790:: -->
709:Super
638:Srnec
609:: -->
608:: -->
607:: -->
562:mello
212:China
203:China
159:China
1221:talk
1202:talk
1171:talk
1128:talk
1107:talk
1051:talk
1004:talk
996:Move
987:talk
977:and
960:talk
939:talk
925:and
899:talk
822:talk
801:talk
777:talk
760:talk
694:talk
683:per
668:talk
642:talk
618:talk
596:talk
460:High
417:, a
336:High
231:High
1196:. —
1082:. —
1027:hi!
873:В²C
719:Dro
567:hi!
126:Mid
1243::
1223:)
1204:)
1173:)
1143:,
1130:)
1109:)
1053:)
1034:)
1032:投稿
1019:,
1006:)
989:)
968:)
941:)
933:.
901:)
887:→
851:.
824:)
779:)
762:)
746:,
742:,
738:,
734:,
670:)
658:,
644:)
636:.
600:—
584:→
574:)
572:投稿
559:,
536:.
372::
1219:(
1200:(
1169:(
1126:(
1105:(
1090:.
1088:Z
1049:(
1030:(
1002:(
985:(
963:·
958:(
937:(
897:(
876:☎
820:(
798:.
775:(
758:(
714:Ψ
696:)
692:(
666:(
640:(
615:.
594:(
570:(
492:.
472:.
438:.
348:.
243:.
138:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
