Knowledge

Talk:Slice sampling

Source 📝

71: 53: 160:
realised that it meant the _actual_ y value of the function at some chosen x. The only sense in which the word 'maximum' applies is for the sampling in step 2. The inclusion of a reference to a 'chosen x' would also make sense of the Markov Chain nature of this procedure (which was also puzzling me), because the next iteration of the chain is then seen to depend on the x derived from step 4 of the procedure from the previous iteration. This also makes sense of later comments about dependence.
22: 163:
The motivation sentence that immediately follows the 4-step description also seems misleading. As specified, the probability of picking a point (or let's say a point within an interval of specific length in a slice) is greater the higher up the slice is, since the relevant length of each slice to be
159:
I found the initial description of slice sampling quite confusing. As I read the first of the numbered steps (1.Compute the maximum value of the distribution (i.e. its maximum y-position) ), I understood this to mean the mode of the PDF. It's only on working through the details much later on that I
139:
The example is close to being really helpful for understanding this method. There appears to be two steps to the algorithm, and it might be nice if the example followed that pattern including how the values are arrived at. It starts with x=0 and then does not go on from there with sepecific values.
117: 140:
Maybe making a specific and a general example would be a good way to go? i.e. an example that starts at zero and then draws a value and takes a step... and then one that is just general. Thanks!
197: 111: 202: 87: 192: 78: 58: 33: 174: 167:
I'm not an expert in this field and am loth to change it myself. Would very much appreciate an expert view.
170: 39: 70: 52: 21: 86:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
186: 145: 83: 141: 178: 149: 15: 82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 116:This article has not yet received a rating on the 164:sampled from is smaller the higher the slice. 8: 135:expansion of the example would be very nice 47: 49: 19: 198:Unknown-importance Statistics articles 7: 76:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 96:Knowledge:WikiProject Statistics 69: 51: 20: 203:WikiProject Statistics articles 99:Template:WikiProject Statistics 1: 90:and see a list of open tasks. 150:20:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 193:C-Class Statistics articles 219: 179:13:19, 26 July 2012 (UTC) 115: 64: 46: 79:WikiProject Statistics 28:This article is rated 155:Confusing description 102:Statistics articles 34:content assessment 171:Stephen Robertson 132: 131: 128: 127: 124: 123: 210: 118:importance scale 104: 103: 100: 97: 94: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 218: 217: 213: 212: 211: 209: 208: 207: 183: 182: 157: 137: 101: 98: 95: 92: 91: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 216: 214: 206: 205: 200: 195: 185: 184: 156: 153: 136: 133: 130: 129: 126: 125: 122: 121: 114: 108: 107: 105: 88:the discussion 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 215: 204: 201: 199: 196: 194: 191: 190: 188: 181: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 161: 154: 152: 151: 147: 143: 134: 119: 113: 110: 109: 106: 89: 85: 81: 80: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 169: 166: 162: 158: 138: 77: 40:WikiProjects 187:Categories 93:Statistics 84:statistics 59:Statistics 30:C-class 36:scale. 175:talk 146:talk 112:??? 189:: 177:) 148:) 173:( 144:( 142:0 120:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Statistics
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Statistics
statistics
the discussion
???
importance scale
0
talk
20:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Stephen Robertson
talk
13:19, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Categories
C-Class Statistics articles
Unknown-importance Statistics articles
WikiProject Statistics articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.