871:
and some of the right-wing viewers are getting very upset with what they see as P.E.T.A. trolling. The other possibility is that this is a far-left nut that took some of the exaggerations he saw on YouTube and got a little over-excited. I didn't do the reverts, but if you want, I can go back and explain on his talk page. (It appears he only created the account to make those 3 edits and hasn't been back since.) But basically, the info is bogus and they were right to revert it. –
953:
939:
829:
802:
792:
767:
753:
739:
237:
976:
853:
203:
42:
870:
As far as I know, the "Society for the
Protection Of Slow Lorises" does not exist, or if it does, it's not noteworthy. The way the insertion reads, it sounds like a smart-ass comment left by a viewer from YouTube. The Wiki articles have been mentioned and quoted a lot on the YouTube video comments,
861:
It appears that there has been some disruption in the edit history recently between a new user and several editors who have reverted him. However, there were no posts to the new editor's page attempting to explain what was wrong with his edits. He appears to be adding a paragraph that, although POV
390:
I'm still not completely understanding this sentence. Are you saying that a palm civet was offered a sample of this toxin and didn't eat it? The toxin was just in liquid form? Would anything eat a toxin offered in this state? Also, what does the second half of the sentence have to do with the first
516:
I removed the reference to Rowe, since that just duplicated the information in
Bearder. However, the other 2 refs are needed because they address the study in different levels of specificity - Nekaris/Bearder gives the precise percentages, but doesn't explcitly mention the gums. Bearder mentions
409:
I went back to the source (which took me a while to remember I viewed on Amazon's "Look inside" feature), and discovered I had mentioned the wrong details. I've added the 3 correct species that were tested, along with more details about the experiment. Just let me know if there are any lingering
597:
Diet, "may enhance their ability to feed on exudates: a long narrow tongue to make it easier to reach gum stashed in cracks and crevices; a large cecum to help the animal digest complex carbohydrates; and a short duodenum." For the first two adaptations you give a reason that a specific change is
577:
I reordered it a bit, moving the 1st 2 sentences of the 2nd paragraph to the end. Now the 1st paragraph introduces the topic and gives the dietary parameters for the larger slow lorises, and the 2nd paragraph concentrates on the dietary parameters of the pygmy slow loris (and the information on
631:
I was about to say the same thing... Osman Hill mentions the anatomy of the digestive tract, including the short duodenum, but does not discuss it it further than that. There may be something in Kubota and
Iwamoto 1966 (cited in Nekaris 2010) that we may want to try to dig up before the FAC.
448:
As far as I know, few scientists work with them, and when they do, I'm sure the animals are sedated. Even in captivity (for a handful of slender lorises), the goal is to not be bitten. The only sources I have seen say "maybe" and don't give anything definite either way. Keep in mind that
1082:
There is still one issue above that I would like to see resolved, but since it is very minor, I am passing the article to GA status as it currently stands. Very nice work on this, guys (and gals, if any of you are!), and I hope I will see it at FAC at some point in the future!
1004:
You're welcome! I've finished going through the rest of the article now, and made a few more comments above. I'm now placing the article on hold to allow the rest of the comments above to be addressed. It's a great article! Also, just as a note, I reviewed the
988:
Thanks for the review Dana. I've fixed some easy ones, and will leave the rest of the comments to VisionHolder, who either has the specific sources, or the primate knowledge to deal with them. Wasn't aware of the new user's additions, I'll leave him a note.
606:
I checked both refs, but the
Nekaris et al. ref only mentions the 3 adaptations (no explanation), while the Swapna et al. ref names and explains 2 of the 3. To be honest, I'm really not sure. Even my book on primate ecology doesn't go into it in detail.
1032:
mostly wrote it, so I left it for him. We didn't realize he was out of the country until yesterday, but it looks like Ucucha just got most of it taken care of. I just spoke to Jack and he said he'd visit to finish off the rest of the concerns. Thanks!
1023:
Thanks. I think someone else wrote most of the Diet section, so I will drop him a note and ask him to look those over. Unfortunately, I don't have access to some of those refs. Otherwise, I've fixed everything I can at the moment. As for
568:
they eat), but then switches back to diet composition, and then back to habits. I think it would make more sense to have all of the composition information together, then all of the habits information together. However, maybe that's just
439:
Behavior and ecology, "the closely related pottos and slender lorises may share the trait." We don't know? Seems like something that we would be quick to find out, if for nothing more than the health of the scientists that work with
862:
and unsourced, was well worded and obviously not straight-up vandalism. Has anyone attempted to contact him to explain what was wrong with his contributions and perhaps see if he has anything positive to contribute to the article?
245:
Lead, "used in personal, social grooming, and feeding." Perhaps "personal and social grooming and feeding"? As it is, "personal" as an independent piece of the sentence doesn't make sense. Same sentence and comment in
Description
482:
Thanks for catching the conflict. I'm not sure why the sources disagree, but it might be a difference between captivity (the longer time) and wild populations (the shorter time). Anyway, I've removed the older (captive) data.
563:
I'm a little confused at the layout of the Diet section. In the first paragraph it talks about the composition of their diet. The second paragraph starts off with a description of their eating habits (not the food itself, but
653:
and I are chatting in Gmail, and he looked up Kubota and
Iwamoto 1966 and said it only talked about the tongue. Unless we can find a general primate book that discusses such adaptations, I think we're at a dead end.
508:
Diet, "A 1984 study of the Sunda slow loris indicated that its diet consists of 71% fruit and gums and 29% insects and other animal prey." Why does this need three references to three different papers?
1009:
article a few days ago and placed it on hold. No-one has yet replied to any of the comments, so I'm hoping that someone watching this page might be interested in popping over there as well? Thanks,
306:
Description, "ranges between being perpendicular to pointing slightly backwards." Because you're taking about a range, I think that the "to" in this sentence should be changed to an "and".
598:
helpful, for the third (the duodenum) you just say it's different and leave it at that. Can we have some reason as to why a short duodenum is a good thing for their particular diet?
536:
Diet, "Slow lorises can eat while hanging upside down from a branch with both hands." They eat with both hands while hanging upside down, or they hang with both hands while eating?
80:
70:
474:
Behavior and ecology. One paragraph says "long weaning times (three to six months)" while the next says "wean at five to seven months." Standardize, please.
366:
Oops... I think I looked at the text when I was paraphrasing and rather than using the wording I was thinking about, I typed the word I was looking at. –
47:
683:
Wildlife trade, "Traditional medicine made from loris parts are thought to cure many diseases," medicine...are - singular/plural agreement.
126:
175:
52:
931:
122:
181:
75:
1062:
Thanks for the review, Dana boomer, and thanks for jumping on this quickly, Sasata. My comments and fixes are noted above. –
759:
107:
273:
Description, "The ears are reduced in size," Reduced from what? Also "their tail is greatly reduced" later in the section.
99:
281:
Fixed. Sorry, both the sources and I think in terms of related primates so the language tends to be comparative. –
209:
578:
exudates, which is primarily a pygmy slow loris issue). The last short paragraph deals with the eating habits.
359:
Behavior and ecology, "an
African palm civet (Nandinia binotata) averted a sample" I'm not sure what this means?
725:
229:
1070:
1041:
879:
699:
662:
615:
491:
457:
418:
374:
289:
1088:
1014:
900:
396:
164:
150:
1057:
1064:
1035:
873:
693:
656:
609:
583:
549:
522:
485:
451:
412:
368:
283:
1084:
1025:
1010:
1006:
994:
921:
896:
637:
392:
346:
319:
259:
217:
160:
146:
159:
Hi! I'll be reviewing this page for GA status and should have the full review up shortly.
115:
17:
1029:
815:
213:
449:
lorisiform primates (and prosimian primates in general) are very poorly understood. –
945:
333:
Behavior and ecology, "Slow lorises can produce" They can produce or they do produce?
225:
221:
745:
579:
545:
518:
990:
650:
633:
342:
315:
255:
92:
1092:
1077:
1048:
1018:
998:
904:
886:
706:
669:
641:
622:
587:
553:
526:
498:
464:
425:
400:
381:
350:
323:
296:
263:
168:
154:
134:
103:
517:the gums, but only gives approximate percentages.
8:
930:(images are tagged and non-free images have
30:
61:
33:
7:
544:The former. I reworded to clarify.
391:half, which talks about cat dander?
975:
925:, where possible and appropriate.
852:
202:
24:
974:
951:
937:
851:
827:
824:Fair representation without bias
800:
790:
765:
751:
737:
235:
201:
1:
952:
938:
828:
801:
791:
766:
752:
738:
236:
1028:, sorry for not replying.
1111:
1093:16:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
1078:23:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
1049:00:01, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
1019:22:49, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
999:19:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
905:16:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
887:23:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
707:00:01, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
670:01:24, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
642:01:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
623:01:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
588:00:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
554:00:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
527:00:34, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
499:23:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
465:23:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
426:00:44, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
401:16:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
382:23:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
351:19:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
324:19:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
297:23:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
264:19:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
169:17:48, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
155:17:48, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
191:reasonably well written
944:(appropriate use with
691:Fixed. Good catch. –
314:Changed as suggested.
919:It is illustrated by
816:neutral point of view
780:broad in its coverage
932:fair use rationales
848:No edit wars, etc.
721:factually accurate
1061:
946:suitable captions
89:
88:
1102:
1073:
1067:
1055:
1044:
1038:
1026:Sunda slow loris
1007:Sunda slow loris
978:
977:
955:
954:
941:
940:
882:
876:
855:
854:
831:
830:
804:
803:
794:
793:
769:
768:
755:
754:
746:reliable sources
741:
740:
702:
696:
665:
659:
618:
612:
494:
488:
460:
454:
421:
415:
377:
371:
292:
286:
239:
238:
205:
204:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1071:
1065:
1042:
1036:
880:
874:
813:It follows the
787:(major aspects)
700:
694:
663:
657:
616:
610:
492:
486:
458:
452:
419:
413:
375:
369:
290:
284:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
18:Talk:Slow loris
12:
11:
5:
1108:
1106:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1053:
1052:
1051:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
890:
889:
865:
864:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
744:(citations to
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
686:
685:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
645:
644:
626:
625:
601:
600:
593:
592:
591:
590:
572:
571:
559:
558:
557:
556:
539:
538:
532:
531:
530:
529:
511:
510:
504:
503:
502:
501:
477:
476:
470:
469:
468:
467:
443:
442:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
404:
403:
385:
384:
361:
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:
336:
335:
329:
328:
327:
326:
309:
308:
302:
301:
300:
299:
276:
275:
269:
268:
267:
266:
249:
248:
186:
185:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1107:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1068:
1059:
1058:edit conflict
1054:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1039:
1031:
1027:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
996:
992:
980:
979:
972:
969:
968:
966:
963:
957:
956:
949:
947:
935:
933:
927:
926:
924:
923:
918:
906:
902:
898:
895:Fair enough.
894:
893:
892:
891:
888:
885:
883:
877:
869:
868:
867:
866:
863:
859:
858:
857:
856:
849:
846:
845:
843:
839:
833:
832:
825:
822:
821:
819:
817:
812:
806:
805:
798:
788:
784:
783:
781:
777:
771:
770:
763:
761:
749:
747:
735:
731:
730:
728:
727:
722:
718:
708:
705:
703:
697:
690:
689:
688:
687:
684:
681:
680:
671:
668:
666:
660:
652:
649:
648:
647:
646:
643:
639:
635:
630:
629:
628:
627:
624:
621:
619:
613:
605:
604:
603:
602:
599:
595:
594:
589:
585:
581:
576:
575:
574:
573:
570:
567:
561:
560:
555:
551:
547:
543:
542:
541:
540:
537:
534:
533:
528:
524:
520:
515:
514:
513:
512:
509:
506:
505:
500:
497:
495:
489:
481:
480:
479:
478:
475:
472:
471:
466:
463:
461:
455:
447:
446:
445:
444:
441:
437:
436:
427:
424:
422:
416:
408:
407:
406:
405:
402:
398:
394:
389:
388:
387:
386:
383:
380:
378:
372:
365:
364:
363:
362:
358:
357:
352:
348:
344:
340:
339:
338:
337:
334:
331:
330:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
310:
307:
304:
303:
298:
295:
293:
287:
280:
279:
278:
277:
274:
271:
270:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
247:
243:
242:
241:
240:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
199:
195:
194:
192:
188:
187:
184:for criteria)
183:
179:
177:
173:
172:
171:
170:
166:
162:
157:
156:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
1066:VisionHolder
1063:
1037:VisionHolder
1034:
987:
970:
964:
943:
929:
920:
875:VisionHolder
872:
860:
847:
841:
823:
814:
796:
786:
779:
757:
743:
734:(references)
733:
724:
720:
695:VisionHolder
692:
682:
658:VisionHolder
655:
611:VisionHolder
608:
596:
565:
562:
535:
507:
487:VisionHolder
484:
473:
453:VisionHolder
450:
438:
414:VisionHolder
411:
370:VisionHolder
367:
332:
305:
285:VisionHolder
282:
272:
244:
207:
197:
190:
174:
158:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
1085:Dana boomer
1011:Dana boomer
897:Dana boomer
393:Dana boomer
222:word choice
161:Dana boomer
147:Dana boomer
104:visual edit
726:verifiable
410:issues. –
341:Reworded.
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
971:Pass/Fail
797:(focused)
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
246:section.
76:Criteria
965:Overall
580:Rlendog
546:Rlendog
519:Rlendog
440:them :)
254:Fixed.
226:fiction
198:(prose)
127:history
108:history
94:Article
991:Sasata
922:images
842:stable
840:It is
818:policy
778:It is
719:It is
651:Ucucha
634:Sasata
343:Sasata
316:Sasata
256:Sasata
228:, and
218:layout
189:It is
178:review
1072:talk
1043:talk
881:talk
701:talk
664:talk
617:talk
569:me...
493:talk
459:talk
420:talk
376:talk
291:talk
230:lists
180:(see
136:Watch
16:<
1089:talk
1030:Jack
1015:talk
995:talk
901:talk
723:and
638:talk
584:talk
550:talk
523:talk
397:talk
347:talk
320:talk
260:talk
214:lead
212:for
182:here
165:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
566:how
210:MoS
1091:)
1033:–
1017:)
997:)
973::
967::
950::
942:b
936::
928:a
903:)
850::
844:.
826::
820:.
799::
795:b
789::
785:a
782:.
764::
760:OR
756:c
750::
742:b
736::
732:a
729:.
654:–
640:)
607:–
586:)
552:)
525:)
483:–
399:)
349:)
322:)
262:)
234::
224:,
220:,
216:,
206:b
200::
196:a
193:.
176:GA
167:)
153:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
1087:(
1075:»
1069:«
1060:)
1056:(
1046:»
1040:«
1013:(
993:(
948:)
934:)
899:(
884:»
878:«
762:)
758:(
748:)
704:»
698:«
667:»
661:«
636:(
620:»
614:«
582:(
548:(
521:(
496:»
490:«
462:»
456:«
423:»
417:«
395:(
379:»
373:«
345:(
318:(
294:»
288:«
258:(
232:)
208:(
163:(
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.