Knowledge

Talk:Space Jam

Source 📝

2702:"The structure of the article may also influence form. A basic cast list in a "Cast" section is appropriate for the majority of Stub-class articles. When the article is in an advanced stage of development, information about the cast can be presented in other ways. A "Cast" section may be maintained but with more detailed bulleted entries, or a table or infobox grouping actors and their roles may be placed in the plot summary or in the "Casting" subsection of a "Production" section. Use tables with care due to their complexity; they are most appropriate for developed, stable articles. (Tables are also recommended to display different casts, such as a Japanese-language voice cast and an English-language voice cast in a Japanese animated film.)": "A "Cast" section may be maintained but with more detailed bulleted entries, or a table or infobox grouping actors and their roles may be placed in the plot summary or in the "Casting" subsection of a "Production" section.": This seems to suggest it is okay to expand on the role of a character without detailing everything they do in the film. 3404: 1269: 731: 1126: 1095: 547: 526: 950: 557: 1922: 1136: 237: 2843:
it as two stars. One singular critic in one singular review can say some aspects were good (positive) and some were bad (negative). There is no confusion except on the part of you of what "negative to mixed" means. Also, nowhere in the policies that you've cited does it explicitly say to not have a lead-in sentence which almost every single film article's critical reception section contains. This is a pet agenda of yours, perhaps?
190: 926: 751: 974: 1229: 902: 374: 353: 1027: 1006: 3040:. Black Mass. 6.5/10, with a 92% approval rating, 12 reviews counted. If I got 65% on a math test when I was a kid, that would have made me happy, but my parents would have been pissed. No idea why that translates to a 92% approval rating and I doubt that anyone else here can properly interpret these averages sufficiently to draw a learned conclusion, be it "mixed" or "mixed to negative" or any such fluff. 818: 779: 384: 661: 633: 1241: 828: 3361: 1367:"Reviews of the movie were generally negative. Many critics compared it unfavorably to Who Framed Roger Rabbit, a popular film in which cartoon characters and live-action humans coexisted in the same film as well. Basketball fans thought the movie to be demeaning to the sport, and to Michael Jordan himself. Many of them also claim it was not canon, despite referencing real-life events." 1281: 671: 3873:
myself.'" Jones also added that, had the film been more true to the source material, Bugs Bunny would not have enlisted the help of Jordan or the other Looney Tunes characters to defeat the Monstars "and moreover, it wouldn't have taken him an hour and a half. Those aliens, whether they were tiny or colossal, would've been dealt with in short order come the seven minute mark."
322: 2638:, which discusses the inclusion of "the real-world context" of actors. There is absolutely no point in providing what the character did in the film - that is what the plot section is for. The cast list either provides a blank list of "Character A, Actor 1", or provides a brief outline, OR the real-life context (why that actor selected, preparations they underwent etc); 476: 458: 1996: 2864:
being described as "mixed". Can you substantiate this, please? That's only for my personal edification, as it's not relevant to this discussion and I'm happy to be wrong about that. You are carefully ignoring my other points which are (again) 1) The phrasing "negative to mixed" (and similar "mixed to
2842:
It seems like you simply don't understand the plain meaning of words. You say in an edit summary, "Might as well say "despite receiving all possible critical response" Mixed = positive and negative." -- This is patently false. A "mixed" review is a single review saying the film was middling, think of
3899:
In most of the scenes, Billy West voices Elmer Fudd, but in a few scenes, Greg Burson voices him. Burson also does most of Foghorn Leghorn's lines, while Bill Farmer (who's credited in voicing Foghorn in this movie) only does one line as Foghorn. I think Burson was going to voice Elmer and Foghorn,
3239:
This is ridiculous false equivalency and strawman arguments. Nobody ever said anything about GWTW or Wayne Knight any other nonsense you spew. First of all, there never has been a rule that fictional characters cannot be credited. You simply made that up. Second of all, Bugs Bunny is on the freaking
2916:
received a rating of 35%, based on 49 reviews, with an average rating of 5.1/10." (Minor point: We don't know that it "holds" the rating, only that it did at the moment we looked at it.) Why isn't that sufficient? If the "summary" of "negative to mixed" is plainly indicated by the score, the summary
2752:
I have already explained, as above. (MOS says no trivia sections; MoS says real-world context, not a full description of what the characters did). Having explained that to you before, and as the policies state that, you have now moved away from any thoughts of being a potentially constructive editor
2543:
Please do not carry out any further reverts without providing adequate sources. I do not not know where to locate such sources; since you are the editor adding unsourced content it is your job to find appropriate sources and if you cannot then the content obviously does not belong in the article. If
1872:
My memory is a bit fuzzy on this, but didn't the idea of Space Jam come from some commercials? I seem to remember some commercials for Nike that Michael Jordan appeared in, in the early 90s, alongside Bugs Bunny and Marvin the Martian. Marvin was, as usual, trying to destroy Earth, and Michael would
3872:
was critical of the film. In a 1998 interview, he expressed his views that the film was "terrible" and said, as a man who worked with the characters for almost thirty years, the story was deeply flawed. "I can tell you, with the utmost confidence," he said, "Porky Pig would never say 'I think I wet
2105:
The reception section is better, but can be expanded on. Siskel and Ebert's review needs a cite, as does Maltin's. Use a few of the reviews found on rottentomatoes to make a section with some positive and some negative reviews counterbalancing each other. It says that it received mixed reviews, but
2808:
because we are presumably combining multiple sources to arrive at "mixed to positive". RottenTomatoes doesn't say "negative to mixed". Rotten Tomatoes has a pass/fail system. So where did the wishy-washy "negative to mixed" come from? Doesn't "mixed" already connote positive and negative? Critical
1941:
We have a few suggestions to make this page better. For instance,we would like to make a few grammatical changes that we found.(jphodges,talesser,Rkharper8) Also we would like to add to the soundtrack heading, and find more information on the critic review.Additional feedback would be appreciated!
2948:
were somewhere better than average (somewhere between calling it the best film of all time and ever-so-slightly better than average) and 65% were somewhere below average (somewhere between calking it the worst ever and ever-so-slightly worse than average. Let's say it was 12 reviews, 33.3% and an
2968:
summary of the reviews they looked at. Why we would be summarizing summaries that we have already quoted is beyond me. Yes, some articles do this anyway. Others do not. Some articles do lots of things that others do not. Some articles are great. Some articles are horrible. The good articles have
2876:
What source are you quoting directly that describes the film as "negative to mixed"? From my perspective, your summary is synthesized. You are concluding, based on the eight or so cherrypicked reviews in the article, what the critical consensus was, and then using a problematic phrase to do
1330:
how old are you wack'd about wiki? This was a childrens movie and was aimed mainly towards them,note the comic actions and exaggerations done by the characters to show they're intentions. This was a great movie that iloved when iwas 4yrs old and still do. this movie beats shaq's Kazaam by a
3019:
At some point, a summary was re-added: "mixed to negative", then changed to "mixed". This is POV. Some editors feel the numbers indicate the reviews are "negative", others "mixed" and still others "mixed to negative". It is obvious that the sources do not clearly say any of these things. -
1405:
Alright, alright, I'm totally confused. The movie was successful or negative? The reception or the movie says that "Reviews of the movie were generally negative.", but the Looney Tunes article says that "Space Jam was somewhat succesful despite it's odd plot". Space Jam is good or bad?
1321:"One scene references Pulp Fiction, with Elmer Fudd and Yosemite Sam dressed as killers and "Misirlou" in the background. This is also presumably a reference to Men In Black." Didn't Men in Black come out in 1997? If so, how can this film, released in 1996, reference it? 2428:
Dan Castellaneta, better known as the voice of Homer Simpson, stars as the male fan who sits next to the aliens at the Basketball game. It is ironic that Castellaneta, who has won several Emmy awards for his voice work, stars in a live action role in an animated
1586:
plot points. I myself have attempted to do this several times, but the corrections are constantly being reverted by IP addresses. It would be wise to consider putting a protection lock on the page to keep unregistered users from undoing the improvements again.
2362:
What is wrong with listing the characters that make cameo appearances? What is wrong with having character descriptions? Okay, the bolding of the characters' names can come out. I was merely separating the live-action and animated characters from one another.
2115:
The NBA players section can be modified and expanded. I'm sure many of the players have commented on them either being part of their movie, or their playing in the film itself, for those that were bad. That would definitely make for an exciting
1669:
Well "bad" or not, those are the rules on Knowledge, and if you choose to continue not following them, then that technically makes you a vandal, which we try to keep out around here. So please start following the rules if you wish to stay here.
2917:
adds nothing. It would be redundant, repeating information that is already there, saying the same thing more than once, making the same point over and over again. Would you write, "Joe Blow liked the film, saying, 'I liked the film.'"?
2817:
does not mandate critical response summaries. It does, however, say that if any form of paraphrasing is in dispute (I have disputed the summaries), that sources be quoted directly. So who are we quoting when we say "negative to mixed"?
3945:, which is to say not at all. If there are reliable sources that describe it way, that's another story of course, but if there aren't, I don't think we should draw that conclusion on our own, and I don't think it'd be accurate anyway. 2086:
Most importantly, and what makes this an auto-fail, is that there's no production information. Any GA film article is going to have something on the cast selection, production development, etc. Take a look at different GAs, such as
2515:. Who is saying that it is "ironic"? You? Knowledge? Neither of these are acceptable. However, if the makers of the film stated they cast him for ironic purposes then it would be ok to mention that.": Where could one find that out? 1370:
Who claims it's not canon? Basketball fans? This appears to be saying that basketball fans refuse to accept that Space Jam actually happened to Michael Jordan. I'd change it, but I'm not even sure what it's supposed to be saying
2939:
be mixed, in a way: "It is an inspired, original treatment of the classic tale, with an energetic script. Purists will not like the departure from the original and may find the pace a bit too rapid..." (saying the movie is good
2300:
The lead sentence says that it mostly negative reviews, but thats not what the rest of the section feels like. Aside from the rotten tomatoes thing, it sounds positive, or at the very least mixed. Should this be changed?
2123:
While the article has a long way to go for a GA, I think that the above can make it a GA-quality article. It sounds like a lot, but once things start falling in place it should be a breeze. If you would like help, the
3197:
be discussed. (While it's early for a consensus, I think it'll snow soon enough.) If anyone feels strongly that Bugs should remain listed as a star pending the outcome of that discussion, feel free to restore it. -
2734:
Once again, I have red the links you have provided. I want you to explain how the revision of the article that I have been working on (not created by me that was Jdogno) breaches the Cast List and Trivia policies.
2969:
their flaws and the bad ones have their strengths. Following what "other articles" do does not ensure that those articles are right, only that this article will be as right or wrong on this one point as they are.
1961:
Does anyone know where the name "space jam" came from? I'd sort of assumed it was some basketball terminology, but it's not listed on the disambiguation page. It would be useful to add to the article if we know.
2894:
is strongly against them. You saying (paraphrased) "they're in every article/ever other article/almost every article" doesn't mean that everybody's on board with them, especially when the phrasing is so wonky.
2822:
is a real-life example of how we don't need to make proclamations about how a film was received. The summary in that article describes what was liked and disliked without deciding for the rest of the world how
2502:"Spotting references to other films is a form of analysis. Even if it is an obvious reference the connection to other films should still should be sourced, because when an editor makes such observations it is 2415:
Spotting references to other films is a form of analysis. Even if it is an obvious reference the connection to other films should still should be sourced, because when an editor makes such observations it is
153: 1483:
I think the Nerdlucks should have their own page. You know, with more specific character descriptions and pictures. I know there is a page for themselves along with the Monstars, but it's much too basic.--
2150:"Manner Washington as Jeffrey Jordan, Michael Jordan's oldest son. Eric Gordon as Marcus Jordan, Michael Jordan's youngest son." He has two sons. That should be older and younger. -est os for three or more. 1639:, because it clearly states that the plot summary should not cover every scene and every moment of a story. The goal is to summarize the story in a short and accessible manner, not regurgitate the details. 983: 801: 1077: 1503:
The movie's credits says the names of the five NERDLUCKS/MONSTARS are POUND, BLANKO, BUPKUS, NAWT and BANG. However, the article says that four of them are named NULL, NADA, ZILCH and VOID. I didn't get
2698:
I have red the links you have provided. I want you to explain how the revision of the article that I have been working on (not created by me that was Jdogno) breaches the Cast List and Trivia policies.
2441:. Who is saying that it is "ironic"? You? Knowledge? Neither of these are acceptable. However, if the makers of the film stated they cast him for ironic purposes then it would be ok to mention that. 4185: 4007: 1254: 1105: 911: 789: 2347:, but with the additional cameo additions, and the character descriptions. As well, there is improper formatting (the bolding of the character names) and the unexplained reordering of the cast. - 1806:
Excuse me, but does anyone know a source of reference for this supposed "Space Jam 2" that I read in this article? I find it hard to believe, and there aren't any references for it either... -
1518:
At over 1000 words, the "plot summary" was actually a blow-by-blow account of the film. I've replaced it with a more encyclopedic (and much briefer) one from an older revision of the article
2944:
bad). More often, reviews may be described as "mixed": there were good reviews and band reviews. "35%...5.1/10" does not tell us that this is the case. This tells us that 35% of the reviews
1043: 4200: 3941:
Hi, are there any sources that describe Space Jam as "semi-biographical"? Because I would say that, despite including some elements of a real person's life, it is about as biographical as
935: 793: 1438:
Actually, the film got negative reviews. The film itself grossed well over 90 million dollars, making it a success. However, negative and successful may lie in the eye of the journalist!
2874:"The overall critical response to a film should be supported by attributions to reliable sources. Avoid weasel words. If any form of paraphrasing is disputed, quote the source directly." 1721:
The Eric Gordon in this movie is not the basketball player for the Clippers. It's a totally different person. He's denied it several times, Michael Jordan has denied it several times.
4160: 2809:
response summaries can't be summaries of cherrypicked reviews. That would mean that anybody could pick a variety of good reviews and say "Critics loved this film!" Too susceptible to
988: 959: 797: 1166: 4120: 4045: 4030: 1294: 1109: 1034: 1011: 740: 643: 430: 760: 647: 4165: 4130: 1259: 916: 2407:
One scene references Pulp Fiction, with Elmer Fudd and Yosemite Sam dressed as killers and "Misirlou" in the background. This is also presumably a reference to Men In Black
1183: 2949:
average of 5/10. Now, was that 4 reviews that gave it a 10 and 8 that gave it 2.5? Maybe it was 4 reviews that gave it a 5.1 and 8 that gave it 4.95? Both would give the
4205: 4155: 3835:
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.
3266:. As explained there, there is indeed a fictional "Donald Kaufman" in that film. There is also an real person named Donald Kaufman who received an Oscar nomination. - 2088: 1299: 2098:
The cast section should be trimmed to focus on the main/secondary characters. Adding in nearly all of them doesn't help much. To throw another film GA out there, use
4135: 4095: 2034: 940: 147: 2651:
The information you are trying to add goes against the MOS, which is taken as the consensus of editors, and acts as a series of guidelines where disputes arise. -
4195: 4040: 1219: 1209: 4145: 964: 2260:
Hi - of of the key points of this film was the various Looney Tunes characters that made cameos in it. There should be a section here for that in the article.
4125: 4085: 3437: 2666:
How is the information miscellaneous? How does it go against the Knowledge MOS? What do you mean by "or provides a brief outline" in relation to characters?
2024: 1493:
Actually I think the Monstars page needs to be merged into here. This article is poorly written and way too long. It doesn't need sub-articles right now. --
4210: 4100: 2477:
How is this significant? It may be be worth mentioning in regards to the plot if it is crucial in some way, but beyond that it looks like a severe case of
1173: 4215: 4115: 3539: 2608:
is for": What do you mean "most of it is just regurgitated plot summary"? Well what is the cast list for besides saying who played which character? "The
1531:
Props to ya! Thanks; I couldn't seem to accomplish trimming down the plot "summary" myself, as I may be too close to the subject. Once again, thanks! —
892: 882: 79: 3900:
but the producers replaced him with West and Farmer respecially. I think it happened late in production, too. I think we should give credit as follows:
2800:, the following notes. "Mixed to positive" "negative to mixed" etc. is meaningless drivel that is shunned by the WikiProject Film community. Please see 2214:
should be merged with this artcle. -Expand the lead section, with a brief summary on the plot, development history, etc. -Find sources for the awards!!
2001: 4150: 4080: 3977:
for directing the film. Even if not credited on the poster, Cervone and Smith did direct a good portion of the film (the film's animation that is, as
440: 4090: 4065: 4055: 3441: 2935:
Rotten Tomatoes does not say "negative to mixed". It says "35%, based on 49 reviews, with an average rating of 5.1/10." (For the record, one review
2581:
The stuff you re-added to cast is debatable; personally I don't like it as most of it is just regurgitated plot summary which isn't really what the
2187:
Don't get discouraged. Looking through the article's history, I can see that it has definitely improved. There's just a little more work to go yet.
1932: 1178: 615: 605: 4190: 4170: 248: 3877:
I can't find any reliable source for this quote (only references are from wikia/fandom articles and blogs). Who was Jones being interviewed by?
1461:
I watched the Vcd yesterday and the final score of the basketball game between the Monstars and the Toon Squad was 77-78. How could it be 86-88?
1554:
The plot summary was brilliant. Whoever took the time to describe every detail of the movie, I appreciate you. Space Jam is a forgotten gem.
4140: 3604: 1751:
into this article - it's effectively orphaned, and only discusses the plot of the movie - i think it could have better usage in this article -
4070: 4035: 3565: 1636: 854: 492: 85: 4180: 4050: 1787: 1419: 1067: 858: 2719:
No, it doesn't say that at all. It talks about "the real-world context" of actors: not about what the characters have done in the film. -
2102:
as an example of what to make. Cites are not required for the cast and plot section unless a direct quote or controversial thing is noted.
2886:
Note also that the film community is divided on the inclusion of critical response summaries in these articles. I know that my colleague
2119:
The plot section is mostly fine. The lead is for now, but after everything else is fixed this will probably need expanding (do that last)
1596: 4110: 3338: 2261: 1876: 1852: 1679: 1648: 1570: 1149: 1100: 406: 263: 4011: 2912:
I don't see a problem with simply saying what the sources say: "On the critical response aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, the film
2382:
There has been a recent spate of edits adding a trivia section to the article. Please take note that each claim should be sourced to a
4105: 3982: 3700: 3094: 3037: 2604:
What do you find "debatable"? "personally I don't like it as most of it is just regurgitated plot summary which isn't really what the
2281: 2092: 1828: 1728: 1655: 1621: 1607: 1342: 1161: 258: 3471: 2520:"The movie was inspired by Nike commercials featuring Michael and Bugs against Marvin and an alien.": Where can that be sourced from? 4060: 3952: 3739: 3644: 3388: 2151: 2139: 2073: 44: 1582:
It doesn't matter. A plot summary that long violates Knowledge standards and should be trimmed down significantly to only include
3724: 2953:
reading from RT, thought the numbers are very different: The first set is sharply divided, the second set shows more agreement.
1543: 1382: 483: 463: 257:
at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
2006: 3942: 3263: 3221: 3190: 2029: 1039: 841: 784: 689: 254: 99: 30: 3248:
and other psuedonyms who have written or directed numerous well-received films. It's simply not a bone of contention. At all.
4075: 3570: 397: 358: 104: 20: 3240:
poster listed as a starring character! Third through fifty of all, fictional charcters have a long history in film credits.
1654:
I read the summary, and it's just as bad as your previous edit. Try going to my talk page and we'll discuss the situation.
1157:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
4175: 3670: 3147: 2099: 1928: 701: 693: 571: 531: 74: 1873:
help Bugs defeat him. When Space Jam came out, I remember thinking that the idea for it had come from those commercials.
3487: 1823: 333: 168: 4000:
Foghorn Leghorn Sounds More Like Greg Burson Can We Please Just Add Greg Burson Here In The Voice Cast Credits Please
2172:
I didn't just write the article alone -- a lot of people pitched in, but they just don't know what an encyclopedia is.
2082:
After reading through this article, I don't think it's ready for GA status yet. Here are the following issues I found:
2775: 2742: 2709: 2673: 2619: 2571: 2503: 2417: 236: 215: 135: 65: 3161:
Bugs Bunny is not a "principal performer". Yes, Donald Kaufman won the BAFTA Award for Best Adapted Screenplay (for
2386:(i.e. the editor should not interpret the film personally). It is important to supply sources so the informatiom is 3926: 2972:
Long story short: We do not have a source that says "negative to mixed". We have a source that says something that
2383: 697: 684: 638: 3452:
article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
3410:
it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.
3096:
Perhaps this article needs a 'Legacy' section on the movie's enduring influence on popular culture, or something.
581: 219: 2240: 3918: 3448:'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for 3416: 2512: 2438: 2399: 1791: 1423: 850: 2525:"Bill Murray keeps changing his mind about wanting to play in the NBA.": Can that be listed as a running gag? 1880: 1675: 1644: 1592: 1566: 3367: 3342: 2306: 2265: 1856: 1732: 109: 2109:
You write that it opened at #1 in the lead, but it's left out of the box office section; add that in there.
129: 3986: 3462: 3171:. The Donald Kaufman who won the BAFTA (and was nominated for an Oscar) is not the fictional character. - 2771: 2738: 2705: 2669: 2615: 2567: 2285: 2211: 2048: 1832: 1659: 1625: 1611: 1522: 1390: 1346: 1947: 3949: 3922: 3785: 3620: 3589: 3392: 3074: 3045: 3009: 2900: 2832: 2549: 2492: 2352: 2192: 2155: 1811: 1707: 1603: 1562: 1484: 339: 2095:
to get an idea of what's needed for that section. You kind of have a start with the cast section, but..
1462: 1372: 1332: 3313: 2866: 2545: 2488: 125: 4003: 3909:
Greg Burson as Elmer Fudd (several scenes, uncredited) and Foghorn Leghorn (most scenes, uncredited)
2458: 2387: 2277: 2246: 2222: 2177: 1897: 1848: 1783: 1724: 1558: 1539: 1450: 1415: 1407: 1141: 3594: 2683:
As I stressed above: you need to read the links I have provided. All is explained in those pages. -
2487:
This is not an exhaustive list but it should give an idea of some of the problems with the section.
1943: 321: 3970: 3839: 3411: 3253: 3116: 2848: 2805: 2594: 1752: 1691: 1322: 1268: 730: 223: 161: 55: 3649: 3224:. The issue will be resolved there and applied to this article. Please discuss the issue there. - 2529: 2449:
The movie was inspired by Nike commercials featuring Michael and Bugs against Marvin and an alien.
2364: 2325: 2112:
Pop culture sections are frowned upon. Even if they can be cited my suggestion would be to axe it.
1042:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
491:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
405:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3101: 2891: 2758: 2724: 2688: 2656: 2635: 2605: 2582: 2302: 2052: 1970: 1671: 1640: 1588: 1505: 300: 175: 70: 3675: 3467: 3220:
was cut off mid-thought. Please use talk pages for discussion. This topic is being discussed at
1125: 1094: 3974: 3705: 3492: 2869:
What alternative do you have for language that the film community is formally against? 2) From
3163: 2533: 2457:
This is an entirely appropriate inclusion in the article, but it needs to be sourced so it is
2368: 2329: 1770: 1386: 949: 51: 3946: 3513: 3070: 3041: 3005: 2896: 2828: 2643: 2609: 2586: 2348: 2344: 2188: 1807: 1703: 1246: 833: 198: 1921: 546: 525: 189: 3978: 3885: 3864: 3795: 3769: 3760: 3734: 3709: 3680: 3654: 3599: 3549: 3523: 3497: 3337:
There should probably be a production section for the film, like there is for most movies.
2478: 2242: 2218: 2173: 2128:
is one of our stronger ones, I'm sure one of them will be glad to give you some pointers.
1893: 1533: 389: 3729: 3518: 3836: 3790: 3544: 3249: 3213: 3112: 2857: 2844: 2819: 2810: 2789: 2590: 2129: 2125: 2063: 562: 141: 3816: 2564:
Sorry if I'm opening an old can of worms but was the problem with this past revision?
4024: 3811: 3625: 3097: 2981: 2929: 2754: 2720: 2684: 2652: 2395: 1964: 1699: 1695: 1154: 3150:
thinks it stars Cate Blanchett and Helena Bonham Carter, instead of... whatever the
3966: 3914: 3245: 2925: 2887: 2340: 1766: 925: 750: 2511:"Dan Castellaneta's role is already mentioned in the casting section. The rest is 1606:. Plus, that user clearly stated that your edits were not, in fact, improvements. 973: 3264:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#Bugs_Bunny_gets_a_starring_credit_in_Space_Jam.3F
3222:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#Bugs_Bunny_gets_a_starring_credit_in_Space_Jam.3F
3191:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#Bugs_Bunny_gets_a_starring_credit_in_Space_Jam.3F
2437:
Dan Castellaneta's role is already mentioned in the casting section. The rest is
1702:, who was the real-life Hornet coach around the period this would have covered. 688:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 3869: 1494: 1469: 1286: 1228: 901: 676: 3440:
to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for
2612:... no debate there. It's just bad news bears.": How is it "bad news bears"? 373: 352: 3881: 1276: 1236: 1131: 1026: 1005: 823: 666: 660: 632: 552: 488: 379: 3189:
I was unaware of the history of this issue when I edited. I've weighed in at
2544:
there is any further reverting administrator intervention will be requested.
3755: 3445: 3430: 1240: 846: 827: 817: 778: 24: 2055:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 1153:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 214:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 3093:
No mention of the Space Jam website? It's pretty notable in its own right:
2870: 2814: 1762: 1748: 705: 402: 3906:
Bill Farmer as Sylvester, Yosemite Sam, and Foghorn Leghorn (one line)
577: 475: 457: 2217:
Those are just a few of my suggestions. I'll work on finding sources.
1412:
In the article now it says "The films response was generally mixed".
2753:
to being a troll. There is nothing further for me to say here now. -
2469:
Bill Murray keeps changing his mind about wanting to play in the NBA.
1842: 1698:
lost his talent? I think it was an actor they used as a stand-in for
2646:, which states "Avoid creating lists of miscellaneous information" 3069:"Pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty much." - Larry David? -- 4015: 3990: 3955: 3930: 3889: 3844: 3685: 3421: 3396: 3346: 3326: 3306: 3276: 3257: 3234: 3208: 3181: 3120: 3105: 3078: 3064: 3049: 3030: 3013: 2994: 2904: 2852: 2836: 2779: 2762: 2746: 2728: 2713: 2692: 2677: 2660: 2623: 2598: 2575: 2553: 2537: 2496: 2372: 2356: 2333: 2310: 2289: 2269: 2250: 2226: 2196: 2181: 2159: 2145: 2079: 1975: 1951: 1901: 1884: 1860: 1836: 1815: 1795: 1774: 1755: 1736: 1711: 1663: 1629: 1615: 1574: 1548: 1525: 1508: 1497: 1487: 1472: 1427: 1394: 1375: 1350: 1335: 3036:
I just saw an RT review a few days ago—lessee...I think it was
2210:-Production history, especially!! -More reception -This film's 1468:
It's really a trivial detail- it's enough to say "they won". --
3355: 3242:
Donald Kaufman was even nominated for an Oscar for Adaptation!
2629:
Slowly - and you need to read the links I'm providing for you:
1931:
that ended on 17 November 2009. Further details are available
1916: 315: 184: 15: 3880:
Please reinstate if an appropriate reference is located. --
2890:
is strongly in favor of them. I know that another colleague
1267: 1227: 972: 948: 924: 900: 749: 729: 2792:
Regarding my recent removal of critical response summaries
1620:
Hmm, I seem to be getting no reply. Maybe no one's online.
845:, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to 3444:
in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of
576:, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to 1038:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 849:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can
3289: 3217: 3001: 2964:
critics, not "critics"). Sometimes Metacritic gives us
2801: 2797: 2793: 2321: 1519: 293: 3903:
Billy West as Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd (most scenes)
2960:
summary of the reviews they looked at (which, BTW, is
160: 2924:
obviously mean "negative to mixed", the "summary" is
1255:
WikiProject Animation - American animation work group
1052:
Knowledge:WikiProject National Basketball Association
853:
the article attached to this page, help out with the
4186:
WikiProject National Basketball Association articles
1449:
is both a critical failure and a financial success.
1055:
Template:WikiProject National Basketball Association
487:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 401:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 267:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
3706:"Bugs Bunny's 3rd Movie: 1001 Rabbit Tales (1982)" 3167:). "Donald Kaufman" was a fictional character in 3135:star Scarlett O'Hara and Rhett Butler? How about 2589:... no debate there. It's just bad news bears. 4201:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance 1821:That's totally dumb. You might be talking about 1341:Actually, I heard one person curse in the film. 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 3352:Semi-protected edit request on 13 December 2016 3054:"Reviews were an inch deep and a mile wide"? - 2089:Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events 1914:We are working on a project for english class. 1780:Yeah. They were really important to the film. 704:. To improve this article, please refer to the 4161:Mid-importance Warner Bros. Animation articles 3595:"Box Office by Studio – Warner Bros. All Time" 2343:, not only in the trivia section, which fails 1295:WikiProject Film - American cinema task force 174: 8: 4121:C-Class Animation articles of Low-importance 4046:Low-importance WikiProject Illinois articles 4031:Knowledge articles that use American English 3438:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting 3000:Another example of a summary being removed 1457:Final Score between Monstars and Toon Squad 1035:WikiProject National Basketball Association 4166:Warner Bros. Animation work group articles 4131:Mid-importance American animation articles 4001: 3650:"The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part (2019)" 3540:List of Warner Bros. Animation productions 2232:Actually, here's a page from the official 1984: 1381:Is this the Knowledge quote that inspired 1089: 1000: 773: 700:. To use this banner, please refer to the 627: 520: 452: 347: 272: 231: 202:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 3730:"Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed (2004)" 2980:describe as "negative to mixed". This is 2804:At the very least, the phrase represents 3895:Voices of Elmer Fudd and Foghorn Leghorn 4206:Mid-importance American cinema articles 4156:C-Class Warner Bros. Animation articles 4008:2001:8003:3353:5C01:C82D:1564:7A64:E610 3571:"Batman: Return of the Caped Crusaders" 2015: 1987: 1359:coach said "What the hell's going on?" 1091: 1002: 775: 629: 522: 454: 349: 319: 4136:American animation work group articles 4096:Mid-importance Animated films articles 3296:list fictional characters as stars. - 2873: 2506:.": Well how do you source those then? 2394:of the content so it does not violate 4196:Low-importance United States articles 4041:C-Class WikiProject Illinois articles 3742:from the original on November 7, 2016 3566:Batman: Return of the Caped Crusaders 3474:from the original on January 20, 2019 2274:I think that would be a great idea! 1694:coach whose reaction was shown after 1637:Knowledge:How to write a plot summary 984:the Warner Bros. Animation work group 222:, this should not be changed without 7: 4146:Mid-importance Looney Tunes articles 3607:from the original on August 16, 2017 3312:The solid consensus is now archived 2106:you don't feel that when reading it. 1765:should be merged into this article. 1147:This article is within the scope of 1032:This article is within the scope of 839:This article is within the scope of 682:This article is within the scope of 568:This article is within the scope of 481:This article is within the scope of 395:This article is within the scope of 4126:C-Class American animation articles 4086:American cinema task force articles 1927:This article was the subject of an 1910:Additional Changes to the Film Page 1194:Knowledge:WikiProject United States 338:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 4211:WikiProject United States articles 4101:Animated films work group articles 3701:List of Looney Tunes feature films 3244:This is to say nothing of all the 2093:Close Encounters of the Third Kind 1197:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 4216:Knowledge articles as assignments 4116:Low-importance Animation articles 3645:The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part 2785:Critical response summary removed 1841:Space Jam itself could recieve a 912:the American animation work group 758:This article is supported by the 738:This article is supported by the 4151:Looney Tunes work group articles 4081:C-Class American cinema articles 3725:Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed 3402: 3359: 3154:roles they provided voices for. 2865:positive", "mixed to negative") 2402:. To pick some random examples: 1920: 1690:Does anyone know who played the 1383:Barkley, Shut Up and Jam: Gaiden 1279: 1239: 1134: 1124: 1093: 1025: 1004: 826: 816: 777: 698:regional and topical task forces 669: 659: 631: 555: 545: 524: 501:Knowledge:WikiProject Basketball 474: 456: 382: 372: 351: 320: 235: 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 4091:C-Class Animated films articles 4066:Low-importance Chicago articles 4056:WikiProject Basketball articles 3943:Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter 3676:"Teen Titans Go! To the Movies" 3545:"The Lego Ninjago Movie (2017)" 3468:"Avengers: Infinity War (2018)" 1214:This article has been rated as 1072:This article has been rated as 1049:National Basketball Association 1012:National Basketball Association 887:This article has been rated as 867:Knowledge:WikiProject Animation 610:This article has been rated as 504:Template:WikiProject Basketball 435:This article has been rated as 4191:C-Class United States articles 4171:WikiProject Animation articles 3921:for additional information. – 3626:"The Lego Batman Movie (2017)" 3262:Discussion is taking place at 2976:be based on data that someone 870:Template:WikiProject Animation 415:Knowledge:WikiProject Illinois 253:nominee, but did not meet the 1: 4141:C-Class Looney Tunes articles 3973:should be credited alongside 3913:Content needs to be cited to 3854:I have removed this portion: 3671:Teen Titans Go! To the Movies 3422:15:23, 13 December 2016 (UTC) 3397:15:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC) 3148:Cinderella (2015 Disney film) 3121:16:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC) 3079:03:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC) 3065:02:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC) 3050:02:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC) 3031:01:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC) 2768:I concede. I understand now. 2160:01:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 2100:No Country for Old Men (film) 1952:19:55, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 1837:14:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC) 1796:17:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 1473:05:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 1395:17:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC) 1376:22:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 1336:19:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 1292:This article is supported by 1252:This article is supported by 1046:and see a list of open tasks. 981:This article is supported by 957:This article is supported by 936:the Animated films work group 933:This article is supported by 909:This article is supported by 590:Knowledge:WikiProject Chicago 495:and see a list of open tasks. 421:WikiProject Illinois articles 418:Template:WikiProject Illinois 409:and see a list of open tasks. 249:Media and drama good articles 42:Put new text under old text. 4071:WikiProject Chicago articles 4036:Former good article nominees 3991:16:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 3488:Independence Day (1996 film) 3347:07:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC) 2867:is shunned by the community. 2390:, but also to establish the 2197:02:19, 1 November 2010 (UTC) 2182:21:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 2146:04:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 2080:04:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 1976:14:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC) 1824:Looney Tunes: Back in Action 1816:04:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC) 1775:05:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 1756:19:22, 26 October 2008 (UTC) 1680:16:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 1664:13:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 1649:07:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 1630:23:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 1616:21:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 1597:18:59, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 1549:03:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 1526:03:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 1428:07:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 1385:? If so, this is legendary. 1351:21:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 593:Template:WikiProject Chicago 4181:Mid-importance NBA articles 4051:C-Class Basketball articles 3382:to reactivate your request. 3370:has been answered. Set the 3307:18:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 3277:13:39, 6 January 2016 (UTC) 3258:14:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 3235:03:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 3209:01:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 3182:01:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 3106:14:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC) 3014:16:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC) 2995:03:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC) 2905:16:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC) 2853:14:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC) 2837:21:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC) 2334:04:22, 19 March 2014‎ (UTC) 2311:04:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC) 2256:List of Looney Tunes cameos 2203:Improvements to the article 1635:I suggest you read through 960:the Looney Tunes work group 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 4232: 4111:C-Class Animation articles 4016:09:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC) 2554:15:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC) 2538:06:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC) 2497:04:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC) 2373:05:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC) 2357:04:33, 19 March 2014 (UTC) 1498:15:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 1488:07:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 1220:project's importance scale 1078:project's importance scale 893:project's importance scale 741:American cinema task force 714:Knowledge:WikiProject Film 616:project's importance scale 441:project's importance scale 261:. Editors may also seek a 4106:WikiProject Film articles 3961:Aniamtion director credit 3956:19:31, 18 July 2021 (UTC) 3931:01:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC) 3890:02:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC) 3845:22:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC) 3493:"Independence Day (1996)" 2634:1. The cast section. See 2270:06:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 1902:16:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC) 1885:13:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC) 1861:00:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC) 1712:16:40, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 1575:02:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 1275: 1235: 1213: 1150:WikiProject United States 1119: 1071: 1020: 980: 956: 932: 908: 886: 811: 761:Animated films task force 757: 737: 717:Template:WikiProject Film 654: 609: 582:Chicago metropolitan area 540: 469: 434: 367: 346: 275: 271: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 4061:C-Class Chicago articles 3919:Knowledge:Citing sources 3436:I check pages listed in 3327:03:54, 30 May 2016 (UTC) 2780:04:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC) 2763:06:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC) 2747:01:08, 18 May 2014 (UTC) 2729:13:57, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 2714:13:54, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 2693:12:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 2678:12:43, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 2661:12:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 2624:11:47, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 2599:10:28, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 2576:07:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC) 2290:14:23, 1 July 2012 (UTC) 2251:19:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC) 2227:19:11, 15 May 2011 (UTC) 2207:Here's what this needs: 1737:04:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC) 1434:Answer to your questions 1155:United States of America 3429:Orphaned references in 1747:i've suggested merging 1509:14:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 857:, or contribute to the 3463:Avengers: Infinity War 3456:Reference named "BOM": 2236:site. That could help: 1929:educational assignment 1272: 1232: 1200:United States articles 977: 953: 929: 905: 754: 734: 484:WikiProject Basketball 328:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 4076:C-Class film articles 3850:Chuck Jones interview 3786:Malcolm X (1992 film) 3621:The Lego Batman Movie 3590:Warner Bros. Pictures 3127:Starring "Bugs Bunny" 1445:Then, in conclusion, 1271: 1231: 976: 952: 928: 904: 842:WikiProject Animation 753: 733: 255:good article criteria 100:Neutral point of view 4176:C-Class NBA articles 2860:I've never heard of 2504:WP:Original research 2418:WP:Original research 1451:User:Leader Vladimir 1408:User:Leader Vladimir 1142:United States portal 398:WikiProject Illinois 301:Good article nominee 220:relevant style guide 216:varieties of English 105:No original research 3937:"semi-biographical" 3442:orphaned references 3152:fictional, animated 2920:If, OTOH, 35% does 2384:WP:Secondary source 1868:Origins of the film 1168:Articles Requested! 690:join the discussion 572:WikiProject Chicago 507:Basketball articles 218:. According to the 3791:"Malcolm X (1992)" 3519:"Smallfoot (2018)" 3290:apparent consensus 3133:Gone With the Wind 2320:What's wrong with 2141:Operation Big Bear 2075:Operation Big Bear 2053:Talk:Space Jam/GA1 1845:in 2012 or 2013. 1463:User: Ken Seng1991 1401:Success or Failure 1273: 1233: 978: 954: 930: 906: 873:Animation articles 755: 735: 334:content assessment 276:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 4018: 4006:comment added by 3386: 3385: 3193:where this issue 3164:Adaptation (film) 2862:one single review 2772:Michael Demiurgos 2739:Michael Demiurgos 2706:Michael Demiurgos 2670:Michael Demiurgos 2616:Michael Demiurgos 2568:Michael Demiurgos 2513:WP:Editorializing 2439:WP:Editorializing 2400:WP:INDISCRIMINATE 2341:original research 2280:comment added by 2043: 2042: 1974: 1939: 1938: 1851:comment added by 1786:comment added by 1739: 1727:comment added by 1692:Charlotte Hornets 1578: 1561:comment added by 1547: 1418:comment added by 1317:Reference to MIB? 1314: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1088: 1087: 1084: 1083: 999: 998: 995: 994: 772: 771: 768: 767: 692:and see lists of 626: 625: 622: 621: 519: 518: 515: 514: 451: 450: 447: 446: 314: 313: 310: 309: 230: 229: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 4223: 3923:wallyfromdilbert 3915:reliable sources 3842: 3831: 3829: 3827: 3807: 3805: 3803: 3781: 3779: 3777: 3751: 3749: 3747: 3720: 3718: 3716: 3696: 3694: 3692: 3666: 3664: 3662: 3640: 3638: 3636: 3616: 3614: 3612: 3585: 3583: 3581: 3561: 3559: 3557: 3535: 3533: 3531: 3514:Smallfoot (film) 3509: 3507: 3505: 3483: 3481: 3479: 3419: 3414: 3406: 3405: 3377: 3373: 3363: 3362: 3356: 3325: 3322: 3319: 3305: 3302: 3299: 3275: 3272: 3269: 3233: 3230: 3227: 3207: 3204: 3201: 3180: 3177: 3174: 3139:, starring God? 3063: 3060: 3057: 3029: 3026: 3023: 2993: 2990: 2987: 2324:of the article? 2292: 2142: 2136: 2126:Film WikiProject 2076: 2070: 1997:Copyvio detector 1985: 1968: 1957:Name of the film 1924: 1917: 1863: 1798: 1722: 1577: 1555: 1537: 1430: 1289: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1249: 1247:Animation portal 1244: 1243: 1202: 1201: 1198: 1195: 1192: 1144: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1128: 1121: 1120: 1115: 1112: 1097: 1090: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1050: 1029: 1022: 1021: 1016: 1008: 1001: 875: 874: 871: 868: 865: 836: 834:Animation portal 831: 830: 820: 813: 812: 807: 804: 781: 774: 722: 721: 718: 715: 712: 685:WikiProject Film 679: 674: 673: 672: 663: 656: 655: 650: 635: 628: 598: 597: 596:Chicago articles 594: 591: 588: 565: 560: 559: 558: 549: 542: 541: 536: 528: 521: 509: 508: 505: 502: 499: 478: 471: 470: 460: 453: 423: 422: 419: 416: 413: 392: 387: 386: 385: 376: 369: 368: 363: 355: 348: 331: 325: 324: 316: 296: 294:November 1, 2010 273: 239: 232: 199:American English 195:This article is 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 4231: 4230: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4021: 4020: 3998: 3979:Foghorn Leghorn 3963: 3939: 3897: 3865:Merrie Melodies 3852: 3840: 3825: 3823: 3821:Box Office Mojo 3817:"Storks (2016)" 3815: 3801: 3799: 3796:Box Office Mojo 3789: 3775: 3773: 3770:Box Office Mojo 3759: 3745: 3743: 3735:Box Office Mojo 3728: 3714: 3712: 3710:Box Office Mojo 3704: 3690: 3688: 3681:Box Office Mojo 3674: 3660: 3658: 3655:Box Office Mojo 3648: 3634: 3632: 3630:Box Office Mojo 3624: 3610: 3608: 3600:Box Office Mojo 3593: 3579: 3577: 3575:Box Office Mojo 3569: 3555: 3553: 3550:Box Office Mojo 3543: 3529: 3527: 3524:Box Office Mojo 3517: 3503: 3501: 3498:Box Office Mojo 3491: 3477: 3475: 3466: 3434: 3417: 3412: 3403: 3375: 3371: 3360: 3354: 3335: 3323: 3320: 3317: 3303: 3300: 3297: 3273: 3270: 3267: 3231: 3228: 3225: 3205: 3202: 3199: 3178: 3175: 3172: 3129: 3091: 3061: 3058: 3055: 3027: 3024: 3021: 2991: 2988: 2985: 2787: 2642:2. Trivia. See 2562: 2380: 2318: 2298: 2275: 2258: 2205: 2170: 2144: 2140: 2130: 2078: 2074: 2064: 2047:This review is 2039: 2011: 1983: 1959: 1912: 1870: 1846: 1804: 1781: 1745: 1719: 1688: 1556: 1516: 1481: 1459: 1436: 1413: 1403: 1365: 1319: 1285: 1280: 1278: 1245: 1238: 1199: 1196: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1174:Become a Member 1140: 1135: 1133: 1113: 1103: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1048: 1047: 1014: 872: 869: 866: 863: 862: 832: 825: 805: 787: 719: 716: 713: 710: 709: 675: 670: 668: 641: 595: 592: 589: 586: 585: 561: 556: 554: 534: 506: 503: 500: 497: 496: 420: 417: 414: 411: 410: 390:Illinois portal 388: 383: 381: 361: 332:on Knowledge's 329: 292: 224:broad consensus 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 4229: 4227: 4219: 4218: 4213: 4208: 4203: 4198: 4193: 4188: 4183: 4178: 4173: 4168: 4163: 4158: 4153: 4148: 4143: 4138: 4133: 4128: 4123: 4118: 4113: 4108: 4103: 4098: 4093: 4088: 4083: 4078: 4073: 4068: 4063: 4058: 4053: 4048: 4043: 4038: 4033: 4023: 4022: 3997: 3994: 3962: 3959: 3938: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3896: 3893: 3875: 3874: 3851: 3848: 3833: 3832: 3808: 3782: 3752: 3721: 3697: 3667: 3641: 3617: 3586: 3562: 3536: 3510: 3484: 3433: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3413:DRAGON BOOSTER 3384: 3383: 3364: 3353: 3350: 3334: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3187: 3159: 3158: 3144: 3143: 3128: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3090: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3017: 3016: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2827:critics felt. 2820:Jurassic World 2786: 2783: 2766: 2765: 2732: 2731: 2696: 2695: 2664: 2663: 2648: 2647: 2640: 2639: 2631: 2630: 2610:trivia section 2602: 2601: 2587:trivia section 2561: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2527: 2526: 2522: 2521: 2517: 2516: 2508: 2507: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2472: 2471: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2452: 2451: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2432: 2431: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2410: 2409: 2379: 2378:Trivia section 2376: 2360: 2359: 2339:It is full of 2317: 2314: 2297: 2294: 2257: 2254: 2238: 2237: 2204: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2169: 2163: 2138: 2121: 2120: 2117: 2113: 2110: 2107: 2103: 2096: 2072: 2058: 2057: 2041: 2040: 2038: 2037: 2032: 2027: 2021: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2012: 2010: 2009: 2007:External links 2004: 1999: 1993: 1990: 1989: 1982: 1979: 1958: 1955: 1937: 1936: 1925: 1911: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1869: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1839: 1803: 1800: 1788:202.163.72.150 1778: 1777: 1744: 1743:Merge proposal 1741: 1718: 1715: 1687: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1652: 1651: 1600: 1599: 1552: 1551: 1515: 1512: 1501: 1500: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1435: 1432: 1420:220.239.44.204 1402: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1364: 1361: 1327: 1318: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1303: 1300:Mid-importance 1291: 1290: 1274: 1264: 1263: 1260:Mid-importance 1251: 1250: 1234: 1224: 1223: 1216:Low-importance 1212: 1206: 1205: 1203: 1187: 1186: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1164: 1162:Template Usage 1158: 1146: 1145: 1129: 1117: 1116: 1114:Low‑importance 1098: 1086: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1074:Mid-importance 1070: 1064: 1063: 1061: 1044:the discussion 1030: 1018: 1017: 1015:Mid‑importance 1009: 997: 996: 993: 992: 989:Mid-importance 979: 969: 968: 965:Mid-importance 955: 945: 944: 941:Mid-importance 931: 921: 920: 917:Mid-importance 907: 897: 896: 889:Low-importance 885: 879: 878: 876: 838: 837: 821: 809: 808: 806:Low‑importance 782: 770: 769: 766: 765: 756: 746: 745: 736: 726: 725: 723: 681: 680: 664: 652: 651: 636: 624: 623: 620: 619: 612:Low-importance 608: 602: 601: 599: 567: 566: 563:Chicago portal 550: 538: 537: 535:Low‑importance 529: 517: 516: 513: 512: 510: 493:the discussion 479: 467: 466: 461: 449: 448: 445: 444: 437:Low-importance 433: 427: 426: 424: 407:the discussion 394: 393: 377: 365: 364: 362:Low‑importance 356: 344: 343: 337: 326: 312: 311: 308: 307: 304: 297: 289: 288: 285: 282: 278: 277: 269: 268: 240: 228: 227: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4228: 4217: 4214: 4212: 4209: 4207: 4204: 4202: 4199: 4197: 4194: 4192: 4189: 4187: 4184: 4182: 4179: 4177: 4174: 4172: 4169: 4167: 4164: 4162: 4159: 4157: 4154: 4152: 4149: 4147: 4144: 4142: 4139: 4137: 4134: 4132: 4129: 4127: 4124: 4122: 4119: 4117: 4114: 4112: 4109: 4107: 4104: 4102: 4099: 4097: 4094: 4092: 4089: 4087: 4084: 4082: 4079: 4077: 4074: 4072: 4069: 4067: 4064: 4062: 4059: 4057: 4054: 4052: 4049: 4047: 4044: 4042: 4039: 4037: 4034: 4032: 4029: 4028: 4026: 4019: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 3995: 3993: 3992: 3988: 3984: 3980: 3976: 3972: 3971:Bruce W Smith 3968: 3960: 3958: 3957: 3954: 3951: 3948: 3944: 3936: 3932: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3917:. Please see 3916: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3907: 3904: 3901: 3894: 3892: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3878: 3871: 3867: 3866: 3861: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3849: 3847: 3846: 3843: 3838: 3822: 3818: 3813: 3812:Storks (film) 3809: 3798: 3797: 3792: 3787: 3783: 3772: 3771: 3766: 3764: 3757: 3753: 3741: 3737: 3736: 3731: 3726: 3722: 3711: 3707: 3702: 3698: 3687: 3683: 3682: 3677: 3672: 3668: 3657: 3656: 3651: 3646: 3642: 3635:September 24, 3631: 3627: 3622: 3618: 3606: 3602: 3601: 3596: 3591: 3587: 3576: 3572: 3567: 3563: 3552: 3551: 3546: 3541: 3537: 3526: 3525: 3520: 3515: 3511: 3500: 3499: 3494: 3489: 3485: 3473: 3469: 3464: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3453: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3432: 3428: 3423: 3420: 3415: 3409: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3381: 3378:parameter to 3369: 3365: 3358: 3357: 3351: 3349: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3339:63.226.236.66 3332: 3328: 3315: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3295: 3291: 3278: 3265: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3153: 3149: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3138: 3134: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3103: 3099: 3095: 3088: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2970: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2954: 2952: 2947: 2943: 2938: 2933: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2918: 2915: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2893: 2892:SummerPhDv2.0 2889: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2875: 2872: 2868: 2863: 2859: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2821: 2816: 2812: 2807: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2784: 2782: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2700: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2611: 2607: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2585:is for. The 2584: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2560:Past revision 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2524: 2523: 2519: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2480: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2470: 2467: 2466: 2460: 2459:WP:Verifiable 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2450: 2447: 2446: 2440: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2419: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2408: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2388:WP:Verifiable 2385: 2377: 2375: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2322:this revision 2315: 2313: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2303:Wikipediman23 2295: 2293: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2262:96.238.196.23 2255: 2253: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2241: 2235: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2215: 2213: 2208: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2167: 2164: 2162: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2148: 2147: 2143: 2137: 2135: 2134: 2127: 2118: 2114: 2111: 2108: 2104: 2101: 2097: 2094: 2090: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2081: 2077: 2071: 2069: 2068: 2062: 2056: 2054: 2050: 2045: 2044: 2036: 2033: 2031: 2028: 2026: 2023: 2022: 2020: 2019: 2014: 2008: 2005: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1995: 1994: 1992: 1991: 1986: 1980: 1978: 1977: 1972: 1967: 1966: 1956: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1923: 1919: 1918: 1915: 1909: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1877:69.204.31.191 1874: 1867: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1853:74.142.141.65 1850: 1844: 1840: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1825: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1801: 1799: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1754: 1750: 1742: 1740: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1716: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700:Allan Bristow 1697: 1696:Muggsy Bogues 1693: 1686:Hornet coach? 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1604:Chachanandler 1602:I agree with 1598: 1594: 1590: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1563:Chachanandler 1560: 1550: 1545: 1541: 1536: 1535: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1524: 1520: 1513: 1511: 1510: 1507: 1506:Brazilian Man 1499: 1496: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1486: 1485:Sharpay Evans 1478: 1474: 1471: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1439: 1433: 1431: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1410: 1409: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1374: 1368: 1362: 1360: 1358: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1339: 1337: 1334: 1328: 1325: 1324: 1316: 1301: 1298:(assessed as 1297: 1296: 1288: 1277: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1258:(assessed as 1257: 1256: 1248: 1242: 1237: 1230: 1226: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1204: 1191:United States 1185: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1163: 1160: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1143: 1132: 1130: 1127: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1111: 1107: 1102: 1101:United States 1099: 1096: 1092: 1079: 1075: 1069: 1066: 1065: 1062: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1036: 1031: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1003: 990: 987:(assessed as 986: 985: 975: 971: 970: 966: 963:(assessed as 962: 961: 951: 947: 946: 942: 939:(assessed as 938: 937: 927: 923: 922: 918: 915:(assessed as 914: 913: 903: 899: 898: 894: 890: 884: 881: 880: 877: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 843: 835: 829: 824: 822: 819: 815: 814: 810: 803: 799: 795: 791: 786: 783: 780: 776: 763: 762: 752: 748: 747: 743: 742: 732: 728: 727: 724: 720:film articles 707: 703: 702:documentation 699: 695: 691: 687: 686: 678: 667: 665: 662: 658: 657: 653: 649: 645: 640: 637: 634: 630: 617: 613: 607: 604: 603: 600: 583: 579: 575: 574: 573: 564: 553: 551: 548: 544: 543: 539: 533: 530: 527: 523: 511: 494: 490: 486: 485: 480: 477: 473: 472: 468: 465: 462: 459: 455: 442: 438: 432: 429: 428: 425: 408: 404: 400: 399: 391: 380: 378: 375: 371: 370: 366: 360: 357: 354: 350: 345: 341: 335: 327: 323: 318: 317: 305: 303: 302: 298: 295: 291: 290: 286: 283: 280: 279: 274: 270: 266: 265: 260: 256: 252: 251: 250: 244: 241: 238: 234: 233: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 200: 194: 191: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 4002:— Preceding 3999: 3983:67.252.82.71 3967:Tony Cervone 3964: 3940: 3908: 3905: 3902: 3898: 3879: 3876: 3863: 3860:Looney Tunes 3859: 3853: 3834: 3824:. Retrieved 3820: 3800:. Retrieved 3794: 3774:. Retrieved 3768: 3762: 3746:November 25, 3744:. Retrieved 3733: 3715:February 14, 3713:. Retrieved 3691:November 22, 3689:. Retrieved 3679: 3659:. Retrieved 3653: 3633:. Retrieved 3629: 3609:. Retrieved 3598: 3578:. Retrieved 3574: 3554:. Retrieved 3548: 3528:. Retrieved 3522: 3502:. Retrieved 3496: 3476:. Retrieved 3455: 3454: 3449: 3435: 3407: 3387: 3379: 3368:edit request 3336: 3293: 3287: 3246:Alan Smithee 3241: 3218:edit summary 3194: 3168: 3162: 3160: 3151: 3145: 3136: 3132: 3130: 3092: 3018: 2977: 2973: 2971: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2956:RT gives us 2955: 2950: 2946:that RT used 2945: 2941: 2936: 2934: 2921: 2919: 2913: 2911: 2861: 2824: 2806:WP:SYNTHESIS 2802:the archives 2788: 2770: 2767: 2737: 2733: 2704: 2701: 2697: 2668: 2665: 2614: 2603: 2566: 2563: 2528: 2486: 2468: 2448: 2427: 2406: 2392:significance 2391: 2381: 2361: 2319: 2299: 2282:108.85.7.191 2276:— Preceding 2273: 2259: 2239: 2233: 2216: 2209: 2206: 2171: 2165: 2149: 2132: 2131: 2122: 2066: 2065: 2060: 2059: 2046: 2035:Instructions 1963: 1960: 1940: 1913: 1892:Of course!! 1875: 1871: 1829:99.19.92.173 1822: 1805: 1779: 1746: 1729:99.149.17.32 1720: 1689: 1672:Cat's Tuxedo 1656:99.19.92.173 1653: 1641:Cat's Tuxedo 1622:99.19.92.173 1619: 1608:99.19.92.173 1601: 1589:Cat's Tuxedo 1583: 1553: 1532: 1523:Tony Sidaway 1517: 1514:Plot summary 1502: 1482: 1460: 1446: 1440: 1437: 1411: 1404: 1387:Artartartart 1373:Lore Sjoberg 1369: 1366: 1356: 1354: 1343:99.19.92.173 1340: 1333:24.66.94.140 1329: 1326: 1320: 1293: 1253: 1215: 1179:Project Talk 1167: 1148: 1073: 1058:NBA articles 1033: 982: 958: 934: 910: 888: 840: 802:Warner Bros. 798:Looney Tunes 759: 739: 683: 611: 570: 569: 482: 436: 396: 340:WikiProjects 299: 264:reassessment 262: 247: 246: 242: 211: 207: 203: 196: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 3996:GREG BURSON 3981:would say) 3947:Writ Keeper 3870:Chuck Jones 3802:October 18, 3556:December 7, 3504:February 5, 3389:151.74.0.59 3146:Strangely, 3071:Cyphoidbomb 3042:Cyphoidbomb 3006:Cyphoidbomb 2897:Cyphoidbomb 2829:Cyphoidbomb 2636:WP:CASTLIST 2546:Betty Logan 2489:Betty Logan 2349:Favre1fan93 2189:Quadzilla99 2152:24.12.72.50 2049:transcluded 1847:—Preceding 1808:Smashman202 1802:Space Jam 2 1782:—Preceding 1723:—Preceding 1717:Eric Gordon 1704:WAVY 10 Fan 1557:—Preceding 1414:—Preceding 1287:Film portal 677:Film portal 259:renominated 197:written in 148:free images 31:not a forum 4025:Categories 3580:15 October 3530:January 7, 3478:August 19, 3372:|answered= 3333:Production 3169:Adaptation 3111:Write it. 2243:Railer-man 2219:Railer-man 2212:soundtrack 2174:Railer-man 2002:Authorship 1988:GA toolbox 1894:Railer-man 1534:Cinemaniac 859:discussion 855:open tasks 706:guidelines 694:open tasks 498:Basketball 489:Basketball 464:Basketball 306:Not listed 3975:Joe Pykta 3868:director 3837:AnomieBOT 3776:April 12, 3756:DC Comics 3611:15 August 3446:Space Jam 3431:Space Jam 3408:Not done: 3250:JesseRafe 3214:JesseRafe 3113:JesseRafe 2982:synthesis 2858:JesseRafe 2845:JesseRafe 2790:JesseRafe 2644:WP:TRIVIA 2606:cast list 2591:Millahnna 2583:cast list 2345:WP:TRIVIA 2296:Reception 2234:Space Jam 2133:Wizardman 2116:addition. 2067:Wizardman 2061:Reviewer: 2025:Templates 2016:Reviewing 1981:GA Review 1944:Rkharper8 1761:I agree, 1584:important 1479:Nerdlucks 1447:Space Jam 1331:thousand. 1106:Animation 864:Animation 847:animation 785:Animation 243:Space Jam 88:if needed 71:Be polite 25:Space Jam 21:talk page 4004:unsigned 3858:Veteran 3740:Archived 3605:Archived 3472:Archived 3098:Robofish 3038:this one 2871:MOS:FILM 2815:MOS:FILM 2755:SchroCat 2721:SchroCat 2685:SchroCat 2653:SchroCat 2479:WP:UNDUE 2316:Revision 2278:unsigned 2030:Criteria 1965:mattbuck 1849:unsigned 1784:unsigned 1763:Monstars 1749:Monstars 1725:unsigned 1571:contribs 1559:unsigned 1544:contribs 1416:unsigned 1323:Undersea 790:American 648:Animated 644:American 412:Illinois 403:Illinois 359:Illinois 212:traveled 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3965:I feel 3826:July 2, 3765:(2018)" 3763:Aquaman 3661:May 10, 3216:: Your 3089:Website 2888:Flyer22 2530:Jdogno5 2365:Jdogno5 2326:Jdogno5 2166:En fait 1767:Jlhiowa 1753:TinGrin 1218:on the 1076:on the 891:on the 614:on the 587:Chicago 580:or the 578:Chicago 532:Chicago 439:on the 330:C-class 284:Process 208:defense 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3292:is to 3195:should 2930:WP:SYN 2429:movie. 2396:WP:DUE 1843:sequel 1495:Wafulz 1470:Wafulz 1441:By JS 1338:hope. 1184:Alerts 1110:Cinema 336:scale. 287:Result 245:was a 126:Google 3882:Hazhk 3810:From 3784:From 3754:From 3723:From 3699:From 3669:From 3643:From 3619:From 3588:From 3564:From 3538:From 3512:From 3486:From 3461:From 3376:|ans= 3366:This 3131:Does 2978:might 2974:might 2966:their 2958:their 2926:WP:OR 2914:holds 2051:from 1363:Canon 1355:Yep, 794:Films 204:color 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 4012:talk 3987:talk 3969:and 3927:talk 3886:talk 3828:2018 3804:2008 3778:2020 3748:2016 3717:2019 3693:2018 3686:IMDb 3663:2019 3637:2017 3613:2017 3582:2016 3558:2017 3532:2019 3506:2009 3480:2019 3450:this 3393:talk 3343:talk 3316:. - 3314:here 3288:The 3254:talk 3137:Noah 3117:talk 3102:talk 3075:talk 3046:talk 3010:talk 3002:here 2984:. - 2962:some 2951:same 2901:talk 2849:talk 2833:talk 2798:here 2796:and 2794:here 2776:talk 2759:talk 2743:talk 2725:talk 2710:talk 2689:talk 2674:talk 2657:talk 2620:talk 2595:talk 2572:talk 2550:talk 2534:talk 2493:talk 2398:and 2369:talk 2353:talk 2330:talk 2307:talk 2286:talk 2266:talk 2247:talk 2223:talk 2193:talk 2178:talk 2156:talk 2091:and 1971:Talk 1948:talk 1933:here 1898:talk 1881:talk 1857:talk 1833:talk 1812:talk 1792:talk 1771:talk 1733:talk 1708:talk 1676:talk 1660:talk 1645:talk 1626:talk 1612:talk 1593:talk 1567:talk 1540:talk 1521:. -- 1424:talk 1391:talk 1347:talk 851:edit 711:Film 696:and 639:Film 281:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 3374:or 3324:PhD 3321:mer 3318:Sum 3304:PhD 3301:mer 3298:Sum 3294:not 3274:PhD 3271:mer 3268:Sum 3232:PhD 3229:mer 3226:Sum 3206:PhD 3203:mer 3200:Sum 3179:PhD 3176:mer 3173:Sum 3062:PhD 3059:mer 3056:Sum 3028:PhD 3025:mer 3022:Sum 2992:PhD 2989:mer 2986:Sum 2942:and 2937:can 2922:not 2877:so. 2825:all 2811:POV 2168:... 1542:• 1504:it. 1357:one 1210:Low 1068:Mid 1040:NBA 883:Low 606:Low 431:Low 176:TWL 4027:: 4014:) 3989:) 3929:) 3888:) 3819:. 3814:: 3793:. 3788:: 3767:. 3758:: 3738:. 3732:. 3727:: 3708:. 3703:: 3684:. 3678:. 3673:: 3652:. 3647:: 3628:. 3623:: 3603:. 3597:. 3592:: 3573:. 3568:: 3547:. 3542:: 3521:. 3516:: 3495:. 3490:: 3470:. 3465:: 3395:) 3380:no 3345:) 3256:) 3119:) 3104:) 3077:) 3048:) 3012:) 3004:. 2932:. 2903:) 2851:) 2835:) 2813:. 2778:) 2761:) 2745:) 2727:) 2712:) 2691:) 2676:) 2659:) 2622:) 2597:) 2574:) 2552:) 2536:) 2495:) 2371:) 2355:) 2332:) 2309:) 2288:) 2268:) 2249:) 2225:) 2195:) 2180:) 2158:) 1950:) 1942:-- 1900:) 1883:) 1859:) 1835:) 1827:. 1814:) 1794:) 1773:) 1735:) 1710:) 1678:) 1662:) 1647:) 1628:) 1614:) 1595:) 1573:) 1569:• 1426:) 1393:) 1349:) 1302:). 1262:). 1108:/ 1104:: 991:). 967:). 943:). 919:). 800:/ 796:/ 792:/ 788:: 646:/ 642:: 210:, 206:, 156:) 54:; 4010:( 3985:( 3953:♔ 3950:⚇ 3925:( 3884:( 3862:/ 3841:⚡ 3830:. 3806:. 3780:. 3761:" 3750:. 3719:. 3695:. 3665:. 3639:. 3615:. 3584:. 3560:. 3534:. 3508:. 3482:. 3424:. 3418:★ 3391:( 3341:( 3252:( 3115:( 3100:( 3073:( 3044:( 3008:( 2928:/ 2899:( 2847:( 2831:( 2774:( 2757:( 2741:( 2723:( 2708:( 2687:( 2672:( 2655:( 2618:( 2593:( 2570:( 2548:( 2532:( 2491:( 2481:. 2461:. 2420:. 2367:( 2351:( 2328:( 2305:( 2284:( 2264:( 2245:( 2221:( 2191:( 2176:( 2154:( 1973:) 1969:( 1962:- 1946:( 1935:. 1896:( 1879:( 1855:( 1831:( 1810:( 1790:( 1769:( 1731:( 1706:( 1674:( 1658:( 1643:( 1624:( 1610:( 1591:( 1565:( 1546:) 1538:( 1422:( 1389:( 1345:( 1222:. 1080:. 895:. 861:. 764:. 744:. 708:. 618:. 584:. 443:. 342:: 226:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Space Jam
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

American English
varieties of English
relevant style guide
broad consensus
Former good article nominee
Media and drama good articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.