853:
series off with traditional sci-fi and close it with sci-fi fantasy. This is the case with videogames as well. You can see the remarkable transitions americans make in Star wars to Halo to even Star trek. The character is in the centre role in sci-fi fantasy of which he is an underdog in scifi. However science fiction usually starts its theme with the underdog which sequels seem to slowly transition into as a major role. Starwars was different, the prequels were all sci-fi fantasy but the traditional 2 were pure science fiction. Some may contend rotj was sci-fi fantasy, however it was not, due to the canadian film industry having strong fantasy elements in sci-fi and sci-fi fantasy, empire strikes back was closer to this role (of which was not directed by lucas). I consider return of the jedi more scifi than sci-fi fantasy though not because of the strong magic theme, and love story around the centre character, but because the character never deviated from his role as an underdog..and the movie was just bad. I conjure that russian sci-fi has strong magical elements with a weak theme, it is very much on the borderline as empire strikes back was. Sci-fi fantasy in videogames is no different then the film industry at times.
915:). No organism can create a planet or become god-like unless its a case of forgery. Major themes like the human ship just navigating to the alien homeworld is very unusual indeed. Other themes include the fact that the alien race can become god-like and create multiple planets, or make a type of human ai with emotions and feelings...the flood themselves are zombies am i right? Def sci-fi fantasy. Alot of american movies tend to do this, they go their seperate ways in other genres. A prime example is the alien/predator series which is like sci-fi horror or sci-fi adventure. Avatar to is more like sci-fi fantasy then sci-fi adventure because life on other moons is not theoretically possible. Not really science fiction. this is like star trek next generation, instead of star trek..star trek did the same thing, star wars even, went into scifi adventure then scifi fantasy (see prequels). Predator and aliens is a case of flipping inbetween the scifi horror and scifi adventure themes.
1203:
stated explicitly in the lead paragraph. It should still be explained in more detail in the article body, because the article as stands assumes that the reader knows what that is. I'm relatively knowledgeable on the subject, and had never seen the term). However, if you think that all of science fiction boils down to "any fictional war that involves advanced technology in some form or another", you would do well to learn why the genre is called "science" fiction and not "space fantasy" fiction. Also, the sections you claim are OR and uncited actually contain many citations, and they appear to already have been present when you posted this. If you have suggestions for improvement, make them. If you just want to gripe, find a web forum somewhere and flame away.
1174:
as requiring 1.0 × 1038 joules of energy, or on the order of millions of times more than necessary to permanently break the planet apart at a slower rate. This is the equivalent of a mass between 1.1 × 1018 to 1.3 × 1019 tonnes of resting matter converted directly into energy (by Albert
Einstein's formula, E = mc²) with no losses. For reference, the mass of the moon is estimated to be 7.36 × 1022 kilograms (or roughly 7.36 × 1019 tonnes, only somewhat greater than the upper estimate of the mass needed to achieve the estimated energy).
911:
aliens whom mastered to created planets via halo rings. Halo for instance is about an evil galactic empire who has a primitive religion? An alien race that spans the galaxy and removes all hostile races with the most superior advanced technology, destroyed their homeworld, has a caste system akin to a aristocracy or a patriarch, is somehow praying to a primitive god? During mohamet's time, gods were a set of rules to control populations during great migrations (see the
156:
135:
377:
359:
89:
64:
261:
240:
271:
166:
1187:
the article's title to Future War, provide a working definition (whatever it means, I still have no idea other than wars in the future) and focus entirely on that instead. I would suggest not trying to do both. Again, I do not find any value in this article but I know it's policy to keep anything that might be fixable, so I offer these observations only as suggestions. Cheers!
33:
431:
1355:
1186:
Personally, I would vote to delete this article. Failing that, I would suggest removing the entire
Technology/Destruction of Planets and Stars/ Navy sections, since they are Original Research and uncited. I would keep the title of the article and focus entirely on warfare in space, or I would change
1173:
It has been calculated that overcoming the gravity holding together an Earth-sized planet takes on the order of 1032 joules of energy, or roughly the total output of the sun in a week. More detailed estimates place the violent destruction of
Alderaan (appearing in Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope)
910:
Halo science fantasy themes: It seems like sci-fi, the first one actually is...but if you delve deeper into the halo universe it turns into starship troopers, its believable to a certain extant, halo 1-scifi, halo 2-scifi fantasy, halo 3-scifi adventure, halo 4 scifi fantasy because the themes are
575:
which was part of the
Battlestar Galactica TV series broadcast in 1978. It does also link to a wikipedia article, to give more information about the source, but this is not part of the reference. I have restored this and several other similar references, along with a {{fact}} tag that was removed
1202:
The article is not perfect, but your assumptions do not constitute a rationale for deletion. From the context, it appears that "future war" is a historical literary concept that was a precursor to modern science fiction. This should be spelled out more clearly. (Edit: I hadn't noticed, but this is
852:
Space war is a major theme to videogame plots, especially in star wars. I presume make a videogame section on spacewar eg masseffect 3, halo etc. It helps differentiate between the mess the americans made of differing scifi fantasy from sci-fi genres. Alot of directors in america seem to start
1118:
What does Future War even mean? There is no definition and the examples given seem to indicate the editors are talking about any fictional war that involves advanced technology in some form or another, which is the entire genre of SciFi. I assumed, from the article's title,
1123:
that this would be about warfare occurring in space. Instead, it seems to be used as an umbrella phrase to talk about any random SciFi war that the editors assigned meaning to, all the while stating the obvious as if this were some sort of profound observation:
771:
Oh, I forgot about that part of Fair Use! As for the
Battlestar Galactica picture, I'm sure a better one could be found and uploaded, but as of right now it is the best one I could find (although I must admit, I'm fairly certain that I didn't
441:
745:
OTOH, I was talking about the battlestar galactica image. This also lacks a fair-use rationale, and it's much less clear what it contributes. It's a picture of some guns. What does the reader learn by looking at it?
665:
Why the
Enterprise's ability to stun targets on the surface of a planet is relevant. This is the only sentence that seems relevant to individual targets on a planet's surface, and it doesn't seem to fit to
1083:
What's the point of the
Blackmore quote, it doesn't seem to do anything or offer any insight or explanations. Its nothing more than a witty comment that lends little more to the article, so why is it here?
881:
Good point, It's not that we americans hav a 'go get em' type of att, its that we have a 'its our turn' type of attitude, because of history and culture all coming into one place from around the world.
979:
Joss Whedon's
Firefly features no sound in space battles (as it would be, with no medium to carry the sound). Is this the first show to do so, and, if not, what is and should it be included?
1422:
1366:
834:
should have a main article, and currently doesn't. If Space combat were tidied up, sourced and renamed to a better name, it would be an appropriate article for this task.
1397:
543:
212:
222:
463:) that, although not completely sourced as of yet, contains information on Space Warfare in fiction not (yet) covered here. Any help with the merge would be welcome.
1295:
1291:
1277:
1402:
392:
364:
679:
Why a fair-use image that provides no useful information to the article and has no fair-use rationale provided for use on this page shouldn't be removed.
188:
1392:
1133:"Some conclude that the human race will never be involved in actual space warfare because of the distances involved and logistical impracticalities."
596:
I think this should be structured more as a history of developments, rather than subsections for each show. So, we'd need to answer questions like:
1146:
ALL Science
Fiction is beyond our current abilities ... if we had master it then it wouldn't be Science Fiction any more, it would just be Fiction.
341:
1412:
662:
The relevance of star trek's handheld phasers to space warfare? I've never seen them used in the show for anything except hand-to-hand combat.
331:
673:
548:
179:
140:
95:
69:
1417:
986:
831:
632:
1348:
960:
788:
734:
before it can be used in the page, according to policy. And while it's relevant, I'm still not convinced it meets the requirement at
711:
503:
475:
1049:
306:
304:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the
1183:
What does this even mean? Why is this paragraph important to the article? The same goes for the last paragraph on Naval Warfare.
1407:
1374:
931:
898:
869:
620:
Uninteresting is, of course, your opinion (which I don't share). Q1 would also more then likely be highly unverifiable.
610:
I'm not sure the flat, uninteresting descriptions of the various weapons that are employed that we have here is useful.
284:
245:
44:
1192:
1164:
Oh really? So far not a single Knowledge editor has read that sentence sober and found nothing problematic with it?
641:
JulesH's suggestions would be a big step towards making that section appropriate for inclusion in an encyclopdeia.
171:
437:
1294:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
518:"Articles and posts on Knowledge, or other websites that mirror Knowledge content, may not be used as sources."
1370:
1227:
1255:
1155:"The energy required to destroy a planet or star is without a doubt well beyond our current scientific means"
990:
629:
1188:
955:
783:
706:
498:
470:
1063:
Support - the two are identical, or at least very similar. Space warfare in fiction is the better title.
1333:
1313:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1301:
1068:
1053:
626:
557:
50:
1044:
As many of the topics covered, if not the actual content itself, are similar or the same, I propose a
1208:
1103:
982:
919:
886:
857:
100:
74:
430:
32:
1084:
1020:
526:
460:
187:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1088:
1024:
735:
1298:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1378:
1341:
1314:
1212:
1196:
1107:
1092:
1072:
1057:
1028:
1014:
994:
966:
935:
902:
873:
842:
794:
750:
717:
687:
645:
636:
614:
585:
530:
509:
481:
1237:
950:
927:
894:
865:
778:
701:
493:
465:
17:
1329:
1064:
1010:
581:
515:
1321:
1245:
1204:
1099:
731:
566:
387:
184:
491:
Some of the referances go to Knowledge, which is against policy. They need to be fixed.
1280:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
642:
522:
1320:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1386:
1362:
540:
to Knowledge articles, but to primary source material. For instance, the reference "
276:
155:
134:
1038:
923:
890:
861:
822:
812:
383:
376:
358:
1287:
1006:
839:
747:
684:
611:
577:
301:
88:
63:
1286:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
696:
270:
266:
260:
239:
161:
1002:
165:
1256:
https://web.archive.org/20061128161919/http://www.theforce.net:80/swtc/ds/
1142:
We could say the same thing about any and all aspects of SciFi, because,
600:
What was the first depiction of a space battle in a film? On television?
1354:
1242:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
825:
is about games, which are different to fiction (although related to it)
297:
293:
606:
How has the development of special effects influenced what we've seen?
1259:
1250:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
912:
818:
I don't think this merge should happen, for a variety of reasons:
695:
To answer the last question, I believe that the photograph of the
289:
1048:
into this article in order to keep the redundancy to a minimum.
603:
What were particularly influential depictions at various times?
699:
is very relivant to the section on the destruction of plants.
425:
26:
1361:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
1353:
1265:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1019:
Didn't the original Battlestar also feature soundless space?
669:
The relevance of the colour of photon torpedoes to anything.
288:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
1098:
Deleted. It wasn't even coherent, as far as I could see.
1226:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
459:
I made a copy of the older versions of this page (found
1231:
828:
All the content there is unsourced, and potentially OR.
183:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1290:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
832:Category:Space trading and combat simulation games
1423:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
948:I agree with your assessment. Leave it as it is.
98:, a project which is currently considered to be
1276:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
676:shouldn't be included in the main body text.
402:Knowledge:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
565:Text "The Living Legend, Part 2" ignored (
405:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
353:
234:
129:
58:
683:Or should I just put my changes back in?
1398:High-importance science fiction articles
571:" is a reference to an episode entitled
355:
310:to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
236:
131:
60:
30:
730:Perhaps so, although it still needs a
555:
674:Battlestar Galactica (1978 TV series)
658:Could somebody please explain to me:
592:Reworking the TV & Movies section
197:Knowledge:WikiProject Science Fiction
110:Knowledge:WikiProject Popular culture
7:
1403:WikiProject Science Fiction articles
282:This article is within the scope of
200:Template:WikiProject Science Fiction
177:This article is within the scope of
113:Template:WikiProject Popular culture
94:This article is within the scope of
1005:preceded it. There may be others.
49:It is of interest to the following
440:on 2007 January 30. The result of
25:
1230:. Please take a moment to review
1393:C-Class science fiction articles
1260:http://www.theforce.net/swtc/ds/
776:find it. I merely put it back).
672:Why a link to the article about
536:The references you removed were
429:
375:
357:
269:
259:
238:
164:
154:
133:
87:
62:
31:
436:This article was nominated for
336:This article has been rated as
217:This article has been rated as
1213:02:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
1108:16:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
408:Guild of Copy Editors articles
1:
1413:Mid-importance novel articles
1342:12:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
995:08:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
751:09:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
738:in section 8 of contributing
718:01:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
688:13:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
191:and see a list of open tasks.
18:Talk:Space warfare in fiction
1093:09:42, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
1073:15:56, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
1029:09:39, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
1015:23:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
936:09:39, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
903:01:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
874:00:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
646:03:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
637:23:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
615:23:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
586:23:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
531:00:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
510:08:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
482:06:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
316:Knowledge:WikiProject Novels
1418:WikiProject Novels articles
1379:21:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
319:Template:WikiProject Novels
180:WikiProject Science Fiction
96:WikiProject Popular culture
1439:
1347:"Space cruiser" listed at
1307:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1248:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1223:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
843:12:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
342:project's importance scale
307:general Project discussion
223:project's importance scale
172:Speculative fiction portal
1197:12:59, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
1058:14:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
967:04:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
795:02:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
736:Knowledge:Fair use#Policy
549:Battlestar Galactica 1978
544:The Living Legend, Part 2
455:Merge with older versions
370:
335:
254:
216:
149:
82:
57:
1365:. Please participate in
1349:Redirects for discussion
1228:Space warfare in fiction
396:, on September 13, 2012.
203:science fiction articles
116:Popular culture articles
1369:if you wish to do so.
1367:the redirect discussion
1219:External links modified
1037:Proposal to Merge with
573:The Living Legen Part 2
1408:C-Class novel articles
1358:
39:This article is rated
1357:
1114:Future war? Say what?
576:without explanation.
399:Guild of Copy Editors
393:Guild of Copy Editors
365:Guild of Copy Editors
1288:regular verification
1273:to let others know.
1234:. If necessary, add
838:Any other comments?
1278:After February 2018
1269:parameter below to
1359:
1283:InternetArchiveBot
1079:Blackmore and Tech
732:fair use rationale
521:I'll remove them.
514:Yes, according to
390:, a member of the
285:WikiProject Novels
45:content assessment
1340:
1308:
1189:Chalchiuhtlatonal
997:
985:comment added by
939:
922:comment added by
906:
889:comment added by
877:
860:comment added by
848:Videogame section
452:
451:
424:
423:
420:
419:
416:
415:
382:This article was
352:
351:
348:
347:
233:
232:
229:
228:
128:
127:
124:
123:
16:(Redirected from
1430:
1336:
1335:Talk to my owner
1331:
1306:
1305:
1284:
1249:
1241:
980:
963:
958:
953:
938:
916:
905:
883:
876:
854:
791:
786:
781:
714:
709:
704:
654:Reverted changes
635:
570:
563:
561:
553:
516:Knowledge policy
506:
501:
496:
478:
473:
468:
433:
426:
410:
409:
406:
403:
400:
379:
372:
371:
361:
354:
324:
323:
320:
317:
314:
279:
274:
273:
263:
256:
255:
250:
242:
235:
205:
204:
201:
198:
195:
174:
169:
168:
158:
151:
150:
145:
137:
130:
118:
117:
114:
111:
108:
91:
84:
83:
78:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
1438:
1437:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1383:
1382:
1352:
1339:
1334:
1299:
1292:have permission
1282:
1243:
1235:
1221:
1116:
1081:
1042:
977:
961:
956:
951:
917:
884:
855:
850:
816:
789:
784:
779:
712:
707:
702:
656:
633:52278 Alpha 771
627:Fenton, Matthew
621:
594:
564:
554:
541:
504:
499:
494:
489:
487:Referance fixes
476:
471:
466:
457:
407:
404:
401:
398:
397:
321:
318:
315:
312:
311:
275:
268:
248:
219:High-importance
202:
199:
196:
194:Science Fiction
193:
192:
185:science fiction
170:
163:
144:High‑importance
143:
141:Science Fiction
115:
112:
109:
107:Popular culture
106:
105:
72:
70:Popular culture
43:on Knowledge's
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1436:
1434:
1426:
1425:
1420:
1415:
1410:
1405:
1400:
1395:
1385:
1384:
1351:
1345:
1332:
1326:
1325:
1318:
1263:
1262:
1254:Added archive
1220:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1144:by definition,
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1121:Space warfare,
1115:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1085:'''Aryeonos'''
1080:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1041:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1021:'''Aryeonos'''
976:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
942:
908:
907:
849:
846:
836:
835:
829:
826:
815:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
743:
723:
722:
721:
720:
681:
680:
677:
670:
667:
663:
655:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
608:
607:
604:
601:
593:
590:
589:
588:
488:
485:
456:
453:
450:
449:
442:the discussion
434:
422:
421:
418:
417:
414:
413:
411:
380:
368:
367:
362:
350:
349:
346:
345:
338:Mid-importance
334:
328:
327:
325:
322:novel articles
281:
280:
264:
252:
251:
249:Mid‑importance
243:
231:
230:
227:
226:
215:
209:
208:
206:
189:the discussion
176:
175:
159:
147:
146:
138:
126:
125:
122:
121:
119:
92:
80:
79:
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1435:
1424:
1421:
1419:
1416:
1414:
1411:
1409:
1406:
1404:
1401:
1399:
1396:
1394:
1391:
1390:
1388:
1381:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1363:Space cruiser
1356:
1350:
1346:
1344:
1343:
1337:
1330:
1323:
1319:
1316:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1303:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1279:
1274:
1272:
1268:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1239:
1233:
1229:
1224:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1184:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1156:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1145:
1134:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1122:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1040:
1036:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
999:
998:
996:
992:
988:
987:58.168.42.150
984:
974:
968:
965:
964:
959:
954:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
940:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
914:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
880:
879:
878:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
847:
845:
844:
841:
833:
830:
827:
824:
821:
820:
819:
814:
810:
796:
793:
792:
787:
782:
775:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
752:
749:
744:
741:
740:significantly
737:
733:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
719:
716:
715:
710:
705:
698:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
686:
678:
675:
671:
668:
664:
661:
660:
659:
653:
647:
644:
640:
639:
638:
634:
631:
628:
624:
619:
618:
617:
616:
613:
605:
602:
599:
598:
597:
591:
587:
583:
579:
574:
568:
559:
551:
550:
545:
539:
535:
534:
533:
532:
528:
524:
519:
517:
512:
511:
508:
507:
502:
497:
486:
484:
483:
480:
479:
474:
469:
462:
454:
447:
443:
439:
435:
432:
428:
427:
412:
395:
394:
389:
385:
381:
378:
374:
373:
369:
366:
363:
360:
356:
343:
339:
333:
330:
329:
326:
309:
308:
303:
302:short stories
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
278:
277:Novels portal
272:
267:
265:
262:
258:
257:
253:
247:
244:
241:
237:
224:
220:
214:
211:
210:
207:
190:
186:
182:
181:
173:
167:
162:
160:
157:
153:
152:
148:
142:
139:
136:
132:
120:
103:
102:
97:
93:
90:
86:
85:
81:
76:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
1360:
1327:
1302:source check
1281:
1275:
1270:
1266:
1264:
1225:
1222:
1185:
1182:
1172:
1163:
1154:
1143:
1141:
1132:
1120:
1117:
1082:
1045:
1043:
1039:Space battle
978:
949:
941:
918:— Preceding
909:
885:— Preceding
856:— Preceding
851:
837:
823:Space combat
817:
813:space combat
777:
773:
739:
700:
682:
657:
622:
609:
595:
572:
558:cite episode
547:
537:
520:
513:
492:
490:
464:
458:
445:
391:
337:
305:
283:
218:
178:
99:
51:WikiProjects
1065:Cyclopaedic
1050:74.170.91.7
981:—Preceding
811:Merge from
384:copy edited
1387:Categories
1205:Dementia13
1100:Dementia13
1001:I believe
952:S h a r k
780:S h a r k
774:originally
703:S h a r k
697:Death Star
630:Lexic Dark
495:S h a r k
467:S h a r k
388:Dementia13
298:novelettes
1322:this tool
1315:this tool
1003:Babylon 5
643:Pete.Hurd
523:Debresser
1328:Cheers.—
1238:cbignore
983:unsigned
957:f a c e
932:contribs
920:unsigned
899:contribs
887:unsigned
870:contribs
858:unsigned
785:f a c e
708:f a c e
500:f a c e
472:f a c e
438:deletion
294:novellas
101:inactive
75:inactive
1338::Online
1267:checked
1232:my edit
975:Firefly
924:Asfd666
891:Asfd666
862:Asfd666
340:on the
221:on the
41:C-class
1371:Zerach
1246:nobots
1007:JulesH
962:2 1 7
840:JulesH
790:2 1 7
748:JulesH
713:2 1 7
685:JulesH
623:thanks
612:JulesH
578:JulesH
505:2 1 7
477:2 1 7
313:Novels
290:novels
246:Novels
47:scale.
1046:merge
913:quran
1375:talk
1271:true
1209:talk
1193:talk
1104:talk
1089:talk
1069:talk
1054:talk
1025:talk
1011:talk
991:talk
928:talk
895:talk
866:talk
582:talk
567:help
527:talk
461:here
446:keep
444:was
300:and
213:High
1296:RfC
1258:to
666:me.
546:".
538:not
386:by
332:Mid
1389::
1377:)
1309:.
1304:}}
1300:{{
1244:{{
1240:}}
1236:{{
1211:)
1195:)
1106:)
1091:)
1071:)
1056:)
1027:)
1013:)
993:)
934:)
930:•
901:)
897:•
872:)
868:•
584:)
562::
560:}}
556:{{
529:)
296:,
292:,
1373:(
1324:.
1317:.
1207:(
1191:(
1102:(
1087:(
1067:(
1052:(
1023:(
1009:(
989:(
926:(
893:(
864:(
742:.
625:/
580:(
569:)
552:.
542:"
525:(
448:.
344:.
225:.
104:.
77:)
73:(
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
