84:
74:
53:
22:
424:
I don't think any source has done that for
Sphenic numbers or mentioned the possibility so I don't think we should do it either. It's not common to do it for other sets than prime numbers. If we do it then it may seem like it should have some special significance for sphenic numbers but that is close
175:
it makes sense to me to have information about why notable alumni are notable but I wouldn't expect information completely unrelated to being an alumni listed, such as how many children they had, or where they were born. Information like that should be in the article about the person, and I feel the
157:
I object to Ams80 calling mathematical facts such as
Catalan numbers and pentagonality "pointless trivia"; facts such as these are extremely relevant to articles about numbers. But I don't object to Ams80 removing those facts from this page, since those facts at least are stated in the pages on the
365:
I changed the part " ...because one of every four consecutive integers is divisible by 4..." to "...because one of every four consecutive integers (except the numbers ranging from -3 up to 3) is divisible by 4..." simply because the statement was incorrect, though I don't like this solution, can
197:
Is it quite right to say "Currently, the largest known sphenic number is i.e., the product of the three largest known
Mersenne primes"? Would it not be better to say simply "Currently, the largest known sphenic number is i.e., the product of the three largest known primes" adding, if required
333:
distinct factors". Also if these are the only factors, we should say so as the article then implies they are: It says there are 8 factors of a sphenic number and then lists them. The definition is ambiguous. Anyway, I've "fixed" it and I hope it is correct!
377:. This seems a better solution to me. Sphenic numbers are defined as positive integers in the opening line. Limiting the argument to positive integers avoids an irrelevant discussion about negative numbers and the status of 0.
171:, is completely irrelevant to the topic of the page, that is why I viewed the entries as pointless trivia. I think that lists should only include information on the list elements if it is in some way relevant, for example at
166:
Maybe I should clarify, I didn't mean to say, and don't believe, that concepts such as
Catalan numbers and pentagonality are "pointless trivia". What I meant to say was that, for example, the fact that 105 is
344:
I am formulating the definition to simply say "the product of three distinct prime numbers". I think this is short and clear. If anyone is in doubt anyway, the next sentence says squares are not allowed.
251:
I find it hard to believe they were copying wikipedia back in 1964, as that would create a timelike-loop somewhere along the road; but still where *they* got the term is very curious, if not odd... --
140:
176:
same way about the numbers in this article, trivia unrelated to number x being a sphenic number should be in the article about number x (if anywhere). Just my opinions --
261:, meaning wedge. If one looks at the Greek delta (Δ) as a possible Greek conception of a wedge, it is not hard to conceive the origin of the connotation of the number 3.
306:
458:
130:
453:
229:
293:
Is this really a stub? It seems pretty much everything that can be said has been said (unless sphenic numbers have applications I'm not aware of).
106:
244:
perhaps most to blame for this article title being used here. The source *I* had for the term is the Funk & Wagnalls
Standard Dictionary (
410:
97:
58:
33:
172:
401:
The main article could be improved if there were a chart showing how sphenic numbers occur when plotted out on a
220:
21:
414:
434:
382:
350:
314:
279:
39:
83:
367:
374:
I changed it to " ...because one of every four consecutive positive integers is divisible by 4..."
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
199:
89:
73:
52:
366:
someone please create a better looking solution, or point out that the statement was correct?
274:
in Funk & Wagnalls, just included to catch other reference works pilfering from theirs. --
430:
402:
378:
346:
310:
275:
271:
252:
257:
I'm not sure anyone really knows the answer to this question, but the term comes from Gk
187:
Now I understand where you're coming from and I agree with you. Thanks for clarifying.
217:
447:
188:
159:
426:
296:
233:
222:
cuts this down to 109, and many of those seem to be based on
Knowledge. (sequence
406:
394:
335:
102:
262:
177:
79:
240:
To be quite frank, I would love to know the precise etymology myself. I am
438:
418:
386:
354:
338:
318:
299:
283:
265:
202:
15:
405:, sort of like the way prime numbers are distributed in an
224:
375:
270:
There is a small, but non nil, chance that that was a
219:
gives 1,710 hits most of which are
Knowledge clones.
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
8:
307:the last paragraph of this fine mini-essay.
19:
47:
370:10:37, 8 Apr 2009 (West-European Time)
49:
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
459:Low-priority mathematics articles
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
454:Start-Class mathematics articles
198:"(which are Mersenne primes)".
158:individual numbers in question.
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
361:Every four consecutive integers
135:This article has been rated as
319:00:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
284:06:22, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
109:and see a list of open tasks.
439:12:57, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
419:08:43, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
355:15:00, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
311:Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick.
276:Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick.
266:07:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
232:) does not use the word. --
339:10:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
300:20:39, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
203:21:23, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
475:
173:Trinity College, Cambridge
387:00:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
236:16:52, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
162:23:11, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC)
134:
67:
46:
191:17:18, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
180:00:10, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
141:project's priority scale
98:WikiProject Mathematics
28:This article is rated
246:International Edition
393:Connection with the
212:Where does the name
121:mathematics articles
329:Should say "three
325:Definition unclear
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
427:original research
305:I concur, as per
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
466:
403:rectangular grid
272:Fictitious entry
253:User:Cimon avaro
227:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
474:
473:
469:
468:
467:
465:
464:
463:
444:
443:
399:
363:
327:
291:
223:
210:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
472:
470:
462:
461:
456:
446:
445:
442:
441:
398:
391:
390:
389:
362:
359:
358:
357:
336:Paul Beardsell
326:
323:
322:
321:
290:
287:
242:
241:
209:
206:
195:
194:
193:
192:
182:
181:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
471:
460:
457:
455:
452:
451:
449:
440:
436:
432:
428:
423:
422:
421:
420:
416:
412:
411:216.99.198.25
408:
404:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
373:
372:
371:
369:
360:
356:
352:
348:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
332:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
303:
302:
301:
298:
294:
288:
286:
285:
281:
277:
273:
268:
267:
264:
260:
255:
254:
249:
247:
239:
238:
237:
235:
231:
226:
221:
218:
215:
207:
205:
204:
201:
200:Richard Pinch
190:
186:
185:
184:
183:
179:
174:
170:
165:
164:
163:
161:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
400:
364:
330:
328:
295:
292:
269:
258:
256:
250:
245:
243:
216:come from?
213:
211:
196:
168:
156:
137:Low-priority
136:
96:
62:Low‑priority
40:WikiProjects
431:PrimeHunter
407:Ulam spiral
395:Ulam spiral
379:PrimeHunter
347:PrimeHunter
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
30:Start-class
448:Categories
331:of its own
368:Blodskaal
169:12-agonal
208:Sphenic?
189:PrimeFan
160:PrimeFan
297:Meekohi
248:1964).
234:Henrygb
228:in the
225:A007304
214:sphenic
139:on the
36:scale.
289:Stub?
263:Lself
259:sphen
178:Ams80
435:talk
415:talk
409:.
383:talk
351:talk
315:talk
309:--
280:talk
230:OEIS
425:to
131:Low
450::
437:)
429:.
417:)
385:)
353:)
317:)
282:)
433:(
413:(
397:?
381:(
349:(
313:(
278:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
