Knowledge

Talk:Spin representation

Source 📝

290:
the same. So without a clear distinction between a group's finite and infinitesimal elements, there's a tendency to explain spin reps with lots of hand-waving and physical nonsense. The truth is that we are exploiting the fact that reps in QM are inherently projective (since a vector and any multiple are physically indistinguishable). So we can pass to the double cover of SO(3) which is SU(2). But this description is likely to be lost on physicists . The pic is misleading with respect to the topology, but is the only (non-trivial) dimension in which a visual depiction of an entire group and its double-cover is possible.
84: 74: 53: 22: 289:
Fair enough... Basically my goal is to help physicists gain some intuition for spin reps. Having a very clear feeling for the difference between SO(3) and SU(2) is important, and it is equally important to understand why this difference is neglected. Obviously the problem is that their algebras are
162:
The "Set up" section has a bit of an oversight in it. It talks about definite forms and double covers of their special orthogonal group, but then when it gets to the case of indefinite forms it does not describe the analogous construction. The fundamental group of these special orthogonal groups
198:
looks like it could be relevant, especially the section on the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition. Also there is some duplication with that article, which may not be a bad thing. Although I don't really have much of a grand vision for how this article and that one should look.
163:
isn't just cyclic anymore so you have to supply additional details to single-out a canonical 2-sheeted covering space. If I edited the page I'd probably go wild and change much of the exposition so I'd rather just leave it to the original authors.
213:
Some overlap is inevitable, as the articles concern closely related objects. The Clebsch-Gordan decomposition is essentially covered by the section "Symmetry and the tensor square", although the latter could be expanded to make this more explicit.
140: 432: 402: 357: 404:. Does this happen in the same way as if we used the form to define a Clifford algebra? The latter construction uses the form, but I thought that the construction of 480: 130: 106: 272:
The picture is missleading. dim 1 is the only dimension in which spin is not simply connected, but this is one of the main proberties of spin.
475: 97: 58: 306: 249: 204: 461: 443: 269:
This article is about the spin representation and not the spin group. Probably the picture would clarify something there.
33: 200: 216: 184: 39: 83: 294: 237: 298: 276: 241: 21: 302: 280: 245: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
407: 377: 332: 89: 233:
Hi there, I added the pic in the intro in the hopes of helping readers visualize this concept.
73: 52: 457: 439: 168: 469: 453: 435: 362:
I got lost (among other places) where in says that the quadratic form identifies
448:
I mean something like in the case of the Dirac algebra where the Lie algebra of
102: 310: 284: 253: 220: 208: 188: 172: 79: 164: 195: 15: 452:
can be formed by taking commutators of the Dirac matrices.
317: 182:
Any thoughts on what else needs to go in this article?
410: 380: 335: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 426: 396: 351: 8: 47: 415: 409: 385: 379: 340: 334: 49: 19: 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 481:Mid-priority mathematics articles 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 135:This article has been rated as 462:20:08, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 444:20:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 189:09:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 173:17:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 476:B-Class mathematics articles 427:{\displaystyle \wedge ^{2}V} 397:{\displaystyle \wedge ^{2}V} 352:{\displaystyle \wedge ^{2}V} 497: 311:18:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC) 285:21:34, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 254:00:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 194:Some of the stuff over at 221:20:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 209:23:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 141:project's priority scale 98:WikiProject Mathematics 428: 398: 353: 28:This article is rated 429: 399: 354: 408: 378: 333: 121:mathematics articles 229:So I added a pic... 424: 394: 349: 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 314: 297:comment added by 257: 240:comment added by 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 488: 433: 431: 430: 425: 420: 419: 403: 401: 400: 395: 390: 389: 358: 356: 355: 350: 345: 344: 313: 291: 256: 234: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 496: 495: 491: 490: 489: 487: 486: 485: 466: 465: 411: 406: 405: 381: 376: 375: 360: 336: 331: 330: 292: 263: 261:removed the pic 235: 231: 180: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 494: 492: 484: 483: 478: 468: 467: 423: 418: 414: 393: 388: 384: 359: 348: 343: 339: 316: 274: 273: 270: 262: 259: 230: 227: 226: 225: 224: 223: 201:Sławomir Biały 179: 176: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 493: 482: 479: 477: 474: 473: 471: 464: 463: 459: 455: 451: 446: 445: 441: 437: 421: 416: 412: 391: 386: 382: 373: 369: 365: 346: 341: 337: 328: 324: 320: 315: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 287: 286: 282: 278: 271: 268: 267: 266: 260: 258: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 228: 222: 219: 218: 212: 211: 210: 206: 202: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 187: 186: 177: 175: 174: 170: 166: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 449: 447: 371: 367: 363: 361: 326: 322: 318: 293:— Preceding 288: 275: 265:Removed it: 264: 236:— Preceding 232: 217:Geometry guy 215: 185:Geometry guy 183: 181: 161: 137:Mid-priority 136: 96: 62:Mid‑priority 40:WikiProjects 434:does not. 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 470:Categories 178:What else? 299:Sukarsono 277:MamboKurt 242:Sukarsono 158:Oversight 307:contribs 295:unsigned 250:contribs 238:unsigned 454:YohanN7 450:so(3;1) 436:YohanN7 374:) with 139:on the 30:B-class 196:spinor 36:scale. 458:talk 440:talk 329:) = 303:talk 281:talk 246:talk 205:talk 169:talk 165:Rybu 131:Mid 472:: 460:) 442:) 413:∧ 383:∧ 364:so 338:∧ 319:so 309:) 305:• 283:) 252:) 248:• 207:) 171:) 456:( 438:( 422:V 417:2 392:V 387:2 372:C 370:, 368:n 366:( 347:V 342:2 327:C 325:, 323:n 321:( 301:( 279:( 244:( 203:( 167:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Mid
project's priority scale
Rybu
talk
17:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Geometry guy
09:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
spinor
Sławomir Biały
talk
23:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Geometry guy
20:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
unsigned
Sukarsono
talk
contribs
00:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
MamboKurt

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.