Knowledge

Talk:Stephanie Grisham

Source 📝

855: 901: 883: 681: 650: 1606:
job. The quote is from an opinion piece. It needs to be worked into the article and it should not be the opening sentence on a paragraph and presented as fact. The way that it is presented as fact and the quote is personal attack on Grisham. The presentation violates NPOV. Please do not restore the way that it is presented until you comment on this page and explain why it should be included and why it should be presented and how it should be presented.--
1568:
job. The quote is from an opinion piece. It needs to be worked into the article and it should not be the opening sentence on a paragraph and presented as fact. The way that it is presented as fact and the quote is personal attack on Grisham. The presentation violates NPOV. Please do not restore the way that it is presented until you comment on this page and explain why it should be included and why it should be presented and how it should be presented.--
1698:, because the presence of a lawsuit can give people a negative impression. But people sue and get sued all the time, often over the most trivial things. As this litigation is still in the filing stages and has not even gone to trial yet, it is too soon to tell if it really has any significance in Grisham's overall biography. It would be better to wait until the lawsuit has concluded to see whether any findings of significance arise. And if the material 618: 691: 441: 542: 515: 378: 552: 784: 796: 316: 292: 431: 410: 261: 190: 326: 1588:
Thia past week, there have been many significant articles characterizing her current job performance. My approach has been to cite 3rd and 4th party references. For example, two prime-time CNN segments by Anderson Cooper. Rather than quoting him directly, I've quoted major reviewers who independently
1671:
There continues to be removal of the litigation that Stephanie Grisham is currently in from her wiki page. The litigation stemmed from an opinion piece she authored in the Washington Post. The court rejected the dismissal of the case ruling in favor of the plaintiff, and against Grisham. The sources
1417:
And the edit commentary isn't helpful. These are details that explain the controversy. BTW, there's is nothing about this in Beto O'Roarke's article. Likewise, it is the fact that she got off very lightly after violating parole during her advocacy for Trump that make it so nationally controversial.
1605:
Your comments give the impression that you don't understand how the Knowledge process works. Your edits state a paragraph like the article is an essay. A Knowledge article is not an essay. You started one paragraph with a quote from an opinion piece that specifically says Grisham is not doing her
1567:
Your comments give the impression that you don't understand how the Knowledge process works. Your edits state a paragraph like the article is an essay. A Knowledge article is not an essay. You started one paragraph with a quote from an opinion piece that specifically says Grisham is not doing her
1229:
Although she gives several puff piece interviews with plenty of details about her children (consistent with her branding), I've narrowed this down to simply their names and years of birth. I've removed where they lived, and when they graduated. Note that she never gives the last name of the second
1273:
I've separated the Early Life from the Legal Issues. This gives a better chronological flow, and means we don't leap directly into controversy. I found a different Heavy.com article more focused on Early Life (specifically her marriage and children), and visually verified the original reporting
1133:
Of course we want reliable sources. However, I've mostly been moving other people's edits around into logical order, and updating refs with cite templates. Also reverting ridiculous claims of "partisan dog whistle" over the meaning of "TBD". The Heavy article was referenced later, but had this
1333:
Obviously, this is not partisan. "TBD" does not have anything to do with the Democratic Party. Contrary to the assertion that she "is in the position indefinitely", several articles indicate that she resigned the former position, but that no succesor has yet been named. Holding 2 positions is
1257:
I'm still concerned about the lack of the usual Early Life section. It (currently) just jumps into her Career, and that's not particularly flattering. The Heavy.com article is (currently) the best known reference; at least it's a secondary source and looks like it has done research of primary
1213:
I'd oppose that, as the article itself later notes the elder has graduated, and in several refs she uses the younger by name as part of her "brand" of busy single mom. We don't remove the names of other celebrity children, so no good reason to do so here. Let's keep it as encyclopedic as
1706:
does not belong in the lead. Also, Knowledge articles are intended to be timeless. To say that "Grisham is involved in a lawsuit" will be meaningless in 10 years. If we eventually reintroduce this material, it should be written as "in June 2022, Grisham was sued..."
1184:. There are at least 5 of these references (wagcenter, marriedbiography, factceleb, celebline, etc), but they all refer to Ancestry.com (or out of thin air). If Heavy.com isn't good enough, then we'll have to wait until some non-celebrity authority does the article. 1517:
moved the block quote into the article. It is a clear violation of BLP. It is written like an essay. Go to the talk page and create a consensus to make the edits wanted. But block quoting a personal attack on the Grisham is not appropriate, violates BLP and is not
1013:
There are quite a few articles/blogs/opinions on this subject. We try to keep to reliable and verifiable sources, without the opinions. Never-the-less, we also try not to whitewash a controversial subject, and correct statements that have generated the
1087:
To follow up, in several interviews she never gives the last name of Jake (born out of wedlock) nor names the father, so I've concluded that we shouldn't do that here either. If some reliable source publishes the research, then it might be time to
1048: 1327:
Removed non standard successor category. There is no precedent to elaborate upon "successor" when one is in the position indefinitely. It is not standard practice to designate a successor when a successor is not known nor is being actively
1070:
None of the articles mention the last name of the second son. He was born around the time of her short marriage to Grisham. Several articles mention that his father is unknown, the kind of detail that is unusual given that there are court
1117:
entry cautions, "When Heavy.com cites another source for their own article, it is preferable to cite the original source instead." Also, I couldn't find where the reference actually verified Grisham's birth name. Did I miss something?
1750:
page to remove the paragraph about the lawsuit in his "Personal life" section since it is already covered in the "Legal issues" section. I'm hesitant to keep the material there for the same reason I removed it here. But the fact that
1550:
As to the plaint that this should be taken to Talk, obviously several folks have already done so. S/he needs to come to Talk and achieve consensus for removal, as this style and these details have been present in the article for many
1383:
The guy didn't "get the chair", he was gasping for his life for 2 hours. Her controversial comments made national and international news. A cite specifically has the word "controversial" in the title, and the others have even more
1230:
child born out of wedlock, so we shouldn't do that here either. Nor is there a need to mention their pictures with Trump and playing with his child. Although that softened the tone of her articles, it really isn't about them.
957:
White House Press Secretary: Those ‘Against’ Trump Deserve to Be Called ‘Human Scum’; “The people who are against him, and who have been against him, and have been working against him since the day they took office are just
1505:
Again, CharlesShirley keeps making slightly different edits to remove white space and bury details into other paragraphs or subparagraphs. Several folks have reverted these variations, and I've reverted yet again today:
153: 1796: 392: 1460:(over 14 months ago), this serves as a transition highlighting the following content with a clear explanation. An alternative in each case might be to add a new subheading, providing an even stronger highlight. 1511:
That's the point entirely. It is undue weight. I have made a good faith edit to keep the information in the normal paragraph and not a block. You need to go to talk page and get consensus to make it blocked
1425:
states the biography should be in chronological order. With such a large number of controversies, it helps to make things nicer and neutral to have at least something near the top that is more pleasant to
1139:
Stephanie Grisham was previously Stephanie Ann Sommerville. A marriage record on Ancestry.com says she was married in Nevada to “Danny Don Marries” on April 7, 1997. He is the father of her son, Kurtis
1755:
has made the allegations by Grisham part of their profile about him, meaning that this particular legal issue already has had career ramifications for him, makes the story a bit different on his end.
1791: 1041: 1388:
in the body. I've tried to remove such labels during my cleanup, but the reader shouldn't have to click through to the ref to understand why it is there. We need to keep some level of detail.
1446:
Again, after a long absence, CharlesShirley removing white space between unrelated paragraphs (and a block quote that serves as a subparagraph heading) obscures the underlying controversy.
1866: 982:
I didn't add that because the truth could be considered biased but it is actually true. Please do not whitewash or lock this page and please do not use it as a chance to try and be funny.
387: 302: 1000:
I don't think anyone is going to add that. After reading this wiki of her, I honestly felt sad for her. She just seems so troubled. And trouble seems to find her wherever she turns.
721: 1547:
I've been careful to select major publications among the many that were in this page before I began cleaning up. This has resulted in a reviewed change from Starter to C class.
1891: 1801: 240: 147: 1841: 738: 632: 1626:
Suppose that I change this to 35th WH PS. Who is going to challenge my edit? I'll gladly list the prior 34. Someone needs to correct the miscounts going a long way back.
1258:
sources. This person has been in the news a lot lately (the only reason that I'd noticed the poor state of the cites), so we should at least make the article presentable.
1589:
decided what was the most important. Specific language was taken from 3rd and 4th party headlines and article content. Hopefully, this yields a more neutral perspective.
200: 627: 525: 1861: 1846: 864: 774: 764: 664: 1896: 1816: 497: 487: 1911: 1781: 983: 245: 1906: 1901: 1836: 728: 228:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 1821: 79: 956: 1886: 1876: 1831: 608: 598: 44: 1180:
I've restored the non-contentious edits (names of known husbands and children). But citing Ancestry.com would be against our longstanding policy on
733: 1484:, I've done my proposed alternative, divided into subsections, with the short quote at the top of the subsection. This will better provide clarity. 1856: 1806: 463: 344: 220: 1536:
or a reporter's name, seemingly to denigrate the statement by making it appear the source is a biased outlier. While this is one way of handling
1881: 1851: 1811: 814: 85: 1368: 348: 1540:, these are not biased opinions. This is a well documented controversy of national importance that has garnered considerable attention by 1916: 1786: 1627: 839: 704: 655: 574: 1871: 1826: 1113:
included using thefamouspeople.com and heavy.com as references. The consensus at RSN is that thefamouspeople.com is not reliable. The
716: 454: 415: 352: 343:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 917: 168: 1762: 1714: 1595: 1557: 1490: 1466: 1432: 1343: 1284: 1264: 1236: 1220: 1190: 1149: 1094: 1077: 1020: 339: 297: 99: 30: 135: 844: 808: 660: 565: 520: 104: 20: 712:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
984:
https://www.salon.com/2019/08/27/the-strange-saga-of-stephanie-grisham-maga-is-a-reward-program-for-mediocre-white-people/
74: 1724:
Does the same standard apply for that whom she is in litigation? That page is the basis for my material on the lawsuit.
1747: 1056: 272: 1649: 908: 888: 65: 1591: 1553: 1541: 1486: 1462: 1428: 1339: 1280: 1260: 1232: 1216: 1186: 1145: 1090: 1073: 1016: 129: 854: 196: 1371:), who removed important details that are necessary to understand controversy, with unhelpful comments such as: 1611: 1573: 1362: 125: 1631: 1052: 229: 109: 1657: 1537: 900: 882: 175: 278: 1421:
Finally, CharlesShirley has been moving things around out of order and removing paragraph white space.
1653: 1637: 990: 696: 239:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 1199:
Good work. I might remove the names of the children, who aren't notable, one of which is a minor. --
260: 189: 1607: 1569: 1477: 1358: 446: 161: 55: 916:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
573:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
462:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1741: 1725: 1689: 1673: 1379:(→Career: This article is about Grisham, not some guy that got the chair. Irrelevant. off topic.) 243:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 70: 680: 649: 1411:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Stephanie_Grisham&diff=927518626&oldid=927518346
1404:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Stephanie_Grisham&diff=927518346&oldid=927518244
1397:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Stephanie_Grisham&diff=927518244&oldid=927517889
1377:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Stephanie_Grisham&diff=927519226&oldid=927518998
141: 1110: 835: 51: 24: 1729: 1677: 1645: 1391:
Likewise, there are a series of edits to her criminal past that were edited into obscurity.
331: 617: 1532: 1385: 1334:
generally illegal (although there are exceptions where the 2nd position receives no pay).
1001: 986: 801: 557: 236: 1037:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
968: 1756: 1708: 1648:
is seen as 32nd (George Stephanopoulos and several others were acting or de facto, see
1204: 1163: 1123: 1530:
Moreover, the only recent difference seem to be embedding a named source in the text,
551: 541: 514: 377: 1775: 1695: 1524: 1314: 1275: 1181: 1114: 819: 709: 1413:(→Personal life: removed more needless wordiness and needless references to Trump.) 459: 1544:
in a time frame of over 6 months. There could be potentially dozens of citations.
1406:(→Personal life: removed more breathless wordiness. See Beto O'Rourke article.) 783: 315: 291: 791: 686: 547: 436: 430: 409: 321: 1200: 1159: 1119: 964: 1766: 1733: 1718: 1681: 1661: 1615: 1599: 1577: 1561: 1494: 1470: 1436: 1347: 1288: 1268: 1240: 1224: 1208: 1194: 1167: 1153: 1127: 1098: 1081: 1060: 1024: 1004: 994: 972: 708:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 822: 570: 1422: 1278:
in a less salacious manner, until another reporter picks up the thread.
1451:(→Trump campaign and administration: removed unnecessary block quote.) 1523:
Although each cleverly seems like a slightly different edit to avoid
1481: 351:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 913: 1033:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
1622:
Can we count? "served as the 30th White House press secretary"
254: 235:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
212: 184: 15: 1527:, they are really all the same change, as reported earlier. 853: 782: 616: 376: 1797:
Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
960:
Andrew Kirell, Updated 10.24.19 6:43PM ET Thedailybeast.com
1042:
Stephanie Grisham's 2013 and 2015 Arizona DUI Mugshots.jpg
1644:
Agreed, this needs some cleaning as her direct successor
1109:
Hi William Allen Simpson. I noticed your recent edits to
1304:
Added 2019-06-25T22:52:13 by User:Therequiembellishere:
1516: 1510: 1457: 1450: 1410: 1403: 1396: 1376: 1326: 1321: 1308: 160: 1418:
Anybody else would have spent years in the hoosegow.
1313:
After 5 months, has recently been removed twice by a
1792:
C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
912:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 569:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 458:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 813:, our collaboration to improve, create, and update 1158:It somehow didn't come up in my search. Thanks. -- 1867:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance 834:For questions about, or to make suggestions for 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1399:(→Personal life: removed breathless wordiness.) 1274:there. This is currently the only way to avoid 1137: 1134:particular detail, so I'd moved it to the top. 1047:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 174: 8: 1892:Unknown-importance U.S. Presidents articles 1802:Politics and government work group articles 1635: 1501:More merging details into other paragraphs 1357:Recently, there were a series of edits by 951:those "against" him are "human scum", add? 877: 828:To comment about this article, select the 644: 509: 404: 286: 1842:Low-importance American politics articles 1694:Current litigation is a tricky matter at 879: 646: 511: 406: 288: 258: 978:High School grad and a Convicted felon 388:the politics and government work group 1862:Low-importance United States articles 1847:American politics task force articles 1317:IP address located in Washington DC. 7: 1897:WikiProject U.S. Presidents articles 1817:Low-importance Conservatism articles 906:This article is within the scope of 865:WikiProject United States Presidents 702:This article is within the scope of 563:This article is within the scope of 452:This article is within the scope of 337:This article is within the scope of 1912:All WikiProject Women-related pages 1782:Biography articles of living people 749:Knowledge:WikiProject United States 277:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1907:C-Class WikiProject Women articles 1902:WikiProject United States articles 1837:C-Class American politics articles 752:Template:WikiProject United States 472:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism 199:on 28 October 2018. The result of 14: 1822:WikiProject Conservatism articles 1672:have been added but are removed. 1584:Maintaining neutral point of view 475:Template:WikiProject Conservatism 1887:C-Class U.S. Presidents articles 1877:Low-importance Colorado articles 1832:Low-importance politics articles 1640:comment added 21:12, 24 May 2020 899: 881: 794: 689: 679: 648: 550: 540: 513: 439: 429: 408: 324: 314: 290: 259: 218:This article must adhere to the 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 769:This article has been rated as 603:This article has been rated as 492:This article has been rated as 361:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 195:This article was nominated for 1857:C-Class United States articles 1807:WikiProject Biography articles 583:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 364:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 1882:WikiProject Colorado articles 1852:WikiProject Politics articles 1812:C-Class Conservatism articles 1696:biographies of living persons 1437:02:10, 23 November 2019 (UTC) 1353:Removals of important details 1348:05:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC) 1322:Removed partisan dog whistle. 1297:Repeated removal of Successor 1289:10:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC) 1269:08:13, 21 November 2019 (UTC) 1241:10:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC) 1225:08:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC) 1209:18:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC) 1195:04:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC) 1168:04:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC) 1154:04:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC) 1128:21:39, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 1099:10:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC) 1082:14:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 1061:19:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 995:18:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC) 920:and see a list of open tasks. 862:This article is supported by 807:This article is supported by 625:This article is supported by 586:Template:WikiProject Politics 577:and see a list of open tasks. 466:and see a list of open tasks. 385:This article is supported by 221:biographies of living persons 42:Put new text under old text. 1748:Max Miller (Ohio politician) 1616:20:15, 6 February 2020 (UTC) 1600:16:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC) 1578:20:15, 6 February 2020 (UTC) 1562:20:28, 6 February 2020 (UTC) 1495:10:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC) 1471:09:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC) 1442:More removals of white space 1105:Sources in Stephanie Grisham 1025:23:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC) 1005:00:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC) 973:00:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC) 628:American politics task force 349:contribute to the discussion 1662:19:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC) 1650:White House Press Secretary 926:Knowledge:WikiProject Women 233:must be removed immediately 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1933: 1917:WikiProject Women articles 1787:C-Class biography articles 1542:Knowledge:Reliable sources 932:WikiProject Women articles 929:Template:WikiProject Women 775:project's importance scale 609:project's importance scale 498:project's importance scale 1872:C-Class Colorado articles 1827:C-Class politics articles 894: 861: 790: 768: 705:WikiProject United States 674: 624: 602: 535: 491: 424: 384: 309: 285: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1767:12:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1734:12:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1719:11:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1682:02:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 1337:So, what do we do here? 845:We invite you to join us 710:United States of America 455:WikiProject Conservatism 1423:MOS:BLP#Order of events 303:Politics and Government 1142: 858: 787: 755:United States articles 621: 381: 267:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 1592:William Allen Simpson 1554:William Allen Simpson 1487:William Allen Simpson 1463:William Allen Simpson 1429:William Allen Simpson 1340:William Allen Simpson 1281:William Allen Simpson 1261:William Allen Simpson 1233:William Allen Simpson 1217:William Allen Simpson 1187:William Allen Simpson 1146:William Allen Simpson 1091:William Allen Simpson 1074:William Allen Simpson 1017:William Allen Simpson 857: 786: 620: 478:Conservatism articles 380: 340:WikiProject Biography 100:Neutral point of view 1301:|successor2 = TBD 810:WikiProject Colorado 697:United States portal 566:WikiProject Politics 105:No original research 1702:to be retained, it 1478:Template:Cquote/doc 840:project's talk page 723:Articles Requested! 447:Conservatism portal 1667:Current litigation 1458:previous quotation 1386:contentious labels 1053:Community Tech bot 859: 815:Knowledge articles 788: 622: 382: 367:biography articles 273:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1641: 1182:original research 1111:Stephanie Grisham 948: 947: 944: 943: 940: 939: 909:WikiProject Women 876: 875: 872: 871: 836:Colorado articles 823:State of Colorado 643: 642: 639: 638: 589:politics articles 508: 507: 504: 503: 403: 402: 399: 398: 253: 252: 211: 210: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 25:Stephanie Grisham 1924: 1759: 1745: 1711: 1693: 1646:Kayleigh McEnany 1115:WP:RSP#Heavy.com 934: 933: 930: 927: 924: 903: 896: 895: 885: 878: 848: 831: 826: 804: 799: 798: 797: 757: 756: 753: 750: 747: 699: 694: 693: 692: 683: 676: 675: 670: 667: 652: 645: 591: 590: 587: 584: 581: 560: 555: 554: 544: 537: 536: 531: 528: 517: 510: 480: 479: 476: 473: 470: 449: 444: 443: 442: 433: 426: 425: 420: 412: 405: 369: 368: 365: 362: 359: 345:join the project 334: 332:Biography portal 329: 328: 327: 318: 311: 310: 305: 294: 287: 270: 264: 263: 255: 241:this noticeboard 213: 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1932: 1931: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1772: 1771: 1765: 1757: 1739: 1717: 1709: 1687: 1669: 1624: 1586: 1538:WP:SUBSTANTIATE 1533:Washington Post 1503: 1444: 1355: 1299: 1107: 1068: 1066:Jake last name? 1049:nomination page 1035: 980: 953: 931: 928: 925: 922: 921: 843: 829: 818: 802:Colorado portal 800: 795: 793: 754: 751: 748: 745: 744: 743: 729:Become a Member 695: 690: 688: 668: 658: 588: 585: 582: 579: 578: 558:Politics portal 556: 549: 529: 523: 477: 474: 471: 468: 467: 445: 440: 438: 418: 366: 363: 360: 357: 356: 330: 325: 323: 300: 271:on Knowledge's 268: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1930: 1928: 1920: 1919: 1914: 1909: 1904: 1899: 1894: 1889: 1884: 1879: 1874: 1869: 1864: 1859: 1854: 1849: 1844: 1839: 1834: 1829: 1824: 1819: 1814: 1809: 1804: 1799: 1794: 1789: 1784: 1774: 1773: 1770: 1769: 1761: 1722: 1721: 1713: 1668: 1665: 1623: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1608:CharlesShirley 1590: 1585: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1570:CharlesShirley 1552: 1521: 1520: 1514: 1502: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1485: 1461: 1454: 1453: 1443: 1440: 1427: 1415: 1414: 1407: 1400: 1381: 1380: 1359:CharlesShirley 1354: 1351: 1338: 1331: 1330: 1324: 1315:single purpose 1311: 1310: 1298: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1279: 1259: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1231: 1215: 1185: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1136: 1135: 1106: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1089: 1072: 1067: 1064: 1045: 1044: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1015: 1008: 1007: 979: 976: 962: 961: 952: 949: 946: 945: 942: 941: 938: 937: 935: 918:the discussion 904: 892: 891: 886: 874: 873: 870: 869: 860: 850: 849: 833: 827: 806: 805: 789: 779: 778: 771:Low-importance 767: 761: 760: 758: 742: 741: 736: 731: 726: 719: 717:Template Usage 713: 701: 700: 684: 672: 671: 669:Low‑importance 653: 641: 640: 637: 636: 633:Low-importance 623: 613: 612: 605:Low-importance 601: 595: 594: 592: 575:the discussion 562: 561: 545: 533: 532: 530:Low‑importance 518: 506: 505: 502: 501: 494:Low-importance 490: 484: 483: 481: 464:the discussion 451: 450: 434: 422: 421: 419:Low‑importance 413: 401: 400: 397: 396: 393:Low-importance 383: 373: 372: 370: 336: 335: 319: 307: 306: 295: 283: 282: 276: 265: 251: 250: 246:this help page 230:poorly sourced 216: 209: 208: 201:the discussion 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1929: 1918: 1915: 1913: 1910: 1908: 1905: 1903: 1900: 1898: 1895: 1893: 1890: 1888: 1885: 1883: 1880: 1878: 1875: 1873: 1870: 1868: 1865: 1863: 1860: 1858: 1855: 1853: 1850: 1848: 1845: 1843: 1840: 1838: 1835: 1833: 1830: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1820: 1818: 1815: 1813: 1810: 1808: 1805: 1803: 1800: 1798: 1795: 1793: 1790: 1788: 1785: 1783: 1780: 1779: 1777: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1754: 1749: 1746:I edited the 1743: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1691: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1666: 1664: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1642: 1639: 1633: 1629: 1628:161.38.130.16 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1548: 1545: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1528: 1526: 1519: 1515: 1513: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1459: 1452: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1441: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1424: 1419: 1412: 1408: 1405: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1389: 1387: 1378: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1364: 1360: 1352: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1335: 1329: 1325: 1323: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1316: 1309: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1302: 1296: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1277: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1256: 1255: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1144: 1143: 1141: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1116: 1112: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1065: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1043: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1032: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1003: 999: 998: 997: 996: 992: 988: 985: 977: 975: 974: 970: 966: 959: 955: 954: 950: 936: 919: 915: 911: 910: 905: 902: 898: 897: 893: 890: 887: 884: 880: 867: 866: 856: 852: 851: 846: 841: 837: 824: 821: 816: 812: 811: 803: 792: 785: 781: 780: 776: 772: 766: 763: 762: 759: 746:United States 740: 737: 735: 732: 730: 727: 725: 724: 720: 718: 715: 714: 711: 707: 706: 698: 687: 685: 682: 678: 677: 673: 666: 662: 657: 656:United States 654: 651: 647: 634: 631:(assessed as 630: 629: 619: 615: 614: 610: 606: 600: 597: 596: 593: 576: 572: 568: 567: 559: 553: 548: 546: 543: 539: 538: 534: 527: 522: 519: 516: 512: 499: 495: 489: 486: 485: 482: 465: 461: 457: 456: 448: 437: 435: 432: 428: 427: 423: 417: 414: 411: 407: 394: 391:(assessed as 390: 389: 379: 375: 374: 371: 354: 353:documentation 350: 346: 342: 341: 333: 322: 320: 317: 313: 312: 308: 304: 299: 296: 293: 289: 284: 280: 274: 266: 262: 257: 256: 248: 247: 242: 238: 234: 231: 227: 223: 222: 217: 215: 214: 206: 202: 198: 194: 191: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1752: 1723: 1703: 1699: 1670: 1643: 1625: 1587: 1549: 1546: 1531: 1529: 1522: 1504: 1455: 1445: 1420: 1416: 1390: 1382: 1365: 1356: 1336: 1332: 1312: 1303: 1300: 1138: 1108: 1069: 1046: 1036: 1014:controversy. 981: 963: 907: 863: 838:, go to our 809: 770: 734:Project Talk 722: 703: 626: 604: 564: 493: 469:Conservatism 460:conservatism 453: 416:Conservatism 386: 338: 279:WikiProjects 244: 232: 225: 219: 205:no consensus 204: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1654:Voncken1996 1636:—Preceding 1002:WatchFan 07 830:New section 148:free images 31:not a forum 1776:Categories 1476:Reviewing 987:ExCITEable 832:tab above. 817:about the 665:Presidents 1758:WikiDan61 1710:WikiDan61 1704:certainly 1456:Like the 1214:possible. 358:Biography 298:Biography 237:libellous 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1763:ReadMe!! 1753:Politico 1715:ReadMe!! 1369:contribs 1328:pursued. 1140:Marries. 1088:revisit. 1071:records. 661:Colorado 580:Politics 571:politics 526:American 521:Politics 197:deletion 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1638:undated 1551:months. 773:on the 607:on the 496:on the 269:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1742:Jstew8 1726:Jstew8 1690:Jstew8 1674:Jstew8 1525:WP:3RR 1482:MOS:BQ 1276:WP:NOR 958:that.” 739:Alerts 275:scale. 126:Google 1518:NPOV. 1426:read. 923:Women 914:women 889:Women 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1730:talk 1678:talk 1658:talk 1632:talk 1612:talk 1596:talk 1574:talk 1558:talk 1512:out. 1491:talk 1480:and 1467:talk 1433:talk 1363:talk 1344:talk 1285:talk 1265:talk 1237:talk 1221:talk 1205:talk 1201:Ronz 1191:talk 1164:talk 1160:Ronz 1150:talk 1124:talk 1120:Ronz 1095:talk 1078:talk 1057:talk 1021:talk 991:talk 969:talk 820:U.S. 347:and 203:was 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1652:). 1051:. — 965:X1\ 765:Low 599:Low 488:Low 226:BLP 176:TWL 1778:: 1732:) 1700:is 1680:) 1660:) 1614:) 1598:) 1576:) 1560:) 1493:) 1469:) 1435:) 1346:) 1287:) 1267:) 1239:) 1223:) 1207:) 1193:) 1166:) 1152:) 1126:) 1118:-- 1097:) 1080:) 1059:) 1023:) 993:) 971:) 842:. 663:/ 659:: 635:). 524:: 395:). 301:: 156:) 54:; 1744:: 1740:@ 1728:( 1692:: 1688:@ 1676:( 1656:( 1634:) 1630:( 1610:( 1594:( 1572:( 1556:( 1489:( 1465:( 1431:( 1409:[ 1402:[ 1395:[ 1375:[ 1366:· 1361:( 1342:( 1283:( 1263:( 1235:( 1219:( 1203:( 1189:( 1162:( 1148:( 1122:( 1093:( 1076:( 1055:( 1019:( 989:( 967:( 868:. 847:! 825:. 777:. 611:. 500:. 355:. 281:: 249:. 224:( 207:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Stephanie Grisham
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion
biographies of living persons
poorly sourced
libellous
this noticeboard

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.