558:
fans and critics, but in terms of overall impact he has not had anywhere near the notability of say George RR Martin, Robert Jordan or
Stephen Donaldson. I certainly would not rate him as a core fantasy writer at this time nor as one with a measurable impact at all on 'general literature'. He's a big fish in a small pond (epic fantasy) but has not had a big impact on the wider field. That said, the new additions and sources are all very well-done and add some needed critical assessment to the article. You may encounter some notability issues regarding blogs, though, since Knowledge (XXG) seems to have conflicting opinions over the viability of large blogs with large fanbases (like Pat's Fantasy Hotlist).--
733:. I only brought up this matter as you mentioned to another editor that I feel the article is ready for GA review, which is not the case with the sources as they are now. In fact, my recommendation is to remove the blog sources as well. As I mentioned elsewhere, there should be some good secondary sources available soon when the newest book is released next week, and at that time reviews, etc., can be used. In the meantime, as I have time, I'll add templates to the existing sources to move along the work. Thanks.
607:
fantasy series since Lord of the Rings, The Wheel of Time opened doors for a lot of fantasy epics that were larger than the standard three volumes. I vaguely remember something about Bantam looking for a huge fantasy epic of its own shortly before they signed Steven
Erikson, so it could be argued that the Malazan series itself was picked up when it was due to Jordan's influence. The fact that the WoT books themselves get pretty bad towards the end has no real bearing on the books' bearing on fantasy publishing.--
442:
265:
1011:. As soon as the book is released (next week) reviews will be available from reliable sources such as Publisher's Weekly, etc. Although, as I'm writing, I realise the release date in the US is later, but nonetheless, good sources will come available very soon. At that point, in my view, moving the YouTube interview to the EL section is also a good suggestion. I'll keep checking for reviews and add sources as they come available. Thanks to
21:
479:
919:). Given what the videos are being used for (claims by the author about his upcoming work), that the claims are not unduly self-serving, and that they're "factual" claims (in quotes because the work is not yet released) about what he expects to do, it seems to me that it's akin to using an author's blog. You'd use it for stuff like this and little else. Ideally, a text source would be better if found though. I've rewritten a bit.
203:
179:
328:
297:
338:
418:
148:
575:
the 250,000 number is a bit inaccurate - it is from 2006 I think - because I have noticed a lot more talk about him than before. However that sort of info doesn't seem to be a thing that publishers... publish. And with Pat's
Hotlist, I think it can be argued to keep it, as it is well regarded through the Fantasy genre. Thanks for the postive review of the edits. Regards.
213:
1078:
I realise the logic appears somewhat convoluted, but if "someone" were to use the YouTube material and publish in reputable journal/newspaper, that would be considered a secondary source which is preferable to using a primary source. In these articles the books themselves are the primary sources, but
574:
I agree with what you say, but I do have a couple of things I'd like to respond to. I hope you aren't arguing that Jordan should be considered important to the
Fantasy genre; if you've read them you'll know there kind of "throw away", in the sense that they haven't had any particular impact. I think
557:
I think the problem is that some of those changes you have made are subjective. Erikson has, in comparison to some other fantasy authors, not sold a vast number of books and his name is not normally dropped into conversation by other writers regularly. He is name-checked a lot by modern epic fantasy
1029:
Actually, there are reviews available already (two that I know off) - the publishers need to get people to make the comments that they shove on the covers. It isn't released until next year in
America and Canada. The only problem I have with wanting to replace the YouTube sources - especially those
947:
I think that that is a good point. What
Erikson says is both independently verifiable and "not unduly self-serving". And they are factually accurate - he has signed a contract, and there will be 6 new novels (two trilogies) and 3 new novellas. I don't know what the policy would say about the idea I
697:
surely suggests that this is reliable. It is from the most reliable source possible - nothing, absolutely nothing, is more reliable than what he himself says. How is a published source going to know more about a new contract than the man who signed the damn thing? Sorry if this seems brash - it has
606:
Cheers. Regarding the Jordan situation, his importance to the genre, irregardless of whatever critics make of his work, has been noted by many, including John Clute's
Encyclopedia of Fantasy and many writers, such as Guy Gavriel Kay and George RR Martin. Like or hate it, as the biggest-selling epic
527:
I upgraded
Erikson's literary importance level to high, from low, in general literature, and to core, from mid, in fantasy genre literature. I think this is justifiable, as many of his peers regard him as one of the greatest ever fantasy authors, and as one of the best living authors in any genre.
1155:
and the other review I thought I had is actually for a book of the same name by a different author. I know you're not being condescending, it has just been an annoying couple of days - still there for now, but what's more important is that we have a reliable source so the sooner we get a matching
652:
I'll state my view - the opposite of
Truthkeeper's - so that an outsider can make a decision. In my opinion, the YouTube sources are as reliable as sources come. The words are straight from the authors mouth, and although transcriptions might be useful normally, the sections are short (most sub 2
962:
I'd be much happier with a *good* text source, and throwing the
Youtube interviews in the EL section. If we've got a good source on the contract (Publisher's Weekly, Amazon, straight-up newspaper reporting) that's much better as a source. I will be pedantic here - these would not be considered
1048:
It may also be perhaps worth noting that a YouTube video of a Barack Obama speech is used as a reliable source on the Barack Obama page, in similar scenario to the Erikson page - i.e. a video where the subject of the page is announcing something about themselves.
1181:. The problem is that I'm seeing a whole lot of information on blogs, which don't fit wikipedia's guidelines for reliable sources. Some sites, though, like Pat's Fantasy Hotlist, seem pretty reliable. Is it ok to use a few like this to talk about the book?
528:
High acclaim for an author who is still writing his first series. He is an important figure in the literary world because he broke the mold in a sense. He went against tradition in the fantasy genre, to great success. Knowledge (XXG) uses "
1063:
And I realise that because something is used on another Wiki page, it doesn't mean it is right - however the Obama page gets 40 times the traffic the Erikson page does (and I checked, it is 40 times more visited).
1379:
279:
1132:
Thanks! Looking forward to the reviews! Also, I apologize if I sounded condescending. As it happens I understand your frustration, but in the grand scheme of things probably not worth being frustrated over--
653:
minutes) so people only need to listen to 2 minutes of speech to get the important info. Copyright isn't an issue as the copyright holder uploaded them, and they therefore become free use. I'd suggest that
535:" as one of the examples of a core piece of literature. I mention this because there are many cases where his peers and literary critics have said that his books are as well written, if not better, than
1374:
1083:
about primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. Also, if reviews are out (I haven't the time to check) can you post them here and I'll create a working references section in the article. Thanks.
1030:
on the contents of the trilogy - is that we will be simply be using a source where someone has written down the stuff from the YouTube video. We will just be using a transcript masquerading as a
797:
I've set up cite web templates; added syntax for multiples; and left in the information from Fantasybookreview. I have removed a source that was a bookstore, but I'll find another to replace it.
451:
311:
671:
Sorry, but I feel that YouTube is not a reliable source. It has all sorts of fraudulent videos and while the words might have come out of the author's mouth, I don't believe that it is a
274:
189:
897:
is that it is mainly a copyright issue. So you can't, for example, say that in television programme X, character Y does Z, and then link a clip from YouTube due to copyright breaches.
1419:
456:
967:
by my definition, I'd hesitate to use them for much else and I'd certainly rather replace them if possible. Ideally, these should be trusted about as much as a press release from
127:
1384:
427:
307:
32:
1409:
432:
1278:
1274:
1260:
1414:
132:
1364:
115:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
408:
231:
107:
1404:
725:
Hi Alan16. I'm sorry you've had an annoying day, but the fact is, author interviews exist on YouTube, but generally are not used here as sources per
1399:
1389:
1097:
I know all about primary and secondary sources, I was merely stating my frustration about the whole process. I'll post the reviews later tonight.
889:, then why not just leave them in, but double them up with another source. I still insist that these are the most reliable sources available, and
398:
1246:
235:
675:
and I'd rather not use it. Please find some other source. However, I'd advise you seek the help of someone more experienced like Kevin. Thanks.
47:
1359:
42:
1424:
1337:
373:
371:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the
230:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
1369:
239:
226:
184:
38:
1256:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
763:
Away from YouTube for a second, fantasybookreview.co.uk is a well respected site, and I think calling it a "blog" is a bit unfair.
41:
at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
1394:
351:
302:
159:
495:
1321:
20:
637:, the YouTube interview most likely is not a reliable source. I'm sure others can be found in their place. Thanks.
116:
987:
927:
1277:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
507:
1341:
1250:
1247:
https://archive.is/20130202022835/http://www.sfbc.com/ecom/pages/nm/product/productDetail.jsp?skuId=1000846474
948:
suggested - leave the YouTube in with a text source as well. Either way, IMNSHO they are completely reliable.
165:
1312:
1238:
1186:
1141:
1088:
1020:
802:
738:
642:
862:
1234:
1178:
1296:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1284:
875:
872:
682:
530:
1237:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
126:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
916:
894:
730:
654:
634:
147:
1152:
992:
971:
about the safety of their latest GMO crop, now featuring genes spliced from an angry catfish. We
932:
890:
694:
1182:
1137:
1084:
1016:
798:
734:
638:
612:
563:
513:
130:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
1281:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
441:
123:
1297:
1079:
in the main article about Erikson, Erikson himself would be considered the primary source. See
264:
589:
885:
The YouTube sources are verifiable. If people still don't think that the YouTube sources are
1161:
1102:
1069:
1054:
1039:
953:
902:
866:
840:
768:
703:
693:
I'm sorry, but this seems quite ridiculous. YouTube sources are generally not reliable, but
676:
662:
547:
509:
478:
218:
1304:
995:
935:
912:
657:
is really for people who upload clips of shows etc.. There is no problem with these links.
1031:
886:
726:
672:
630:
1263:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1230:
1207:
536:
1303:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1270:
1353:
984:
924:
608:
559:
343:
1177:
I found a whole lot of references to the new book by Erikson, the first of which is
1216:
1157:
1098:
1065:
1050:
1035:
949:
898:
836:
764:
699:
658:
576:
543:
368:
202:
178:
1269:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
337:
333:
327:
296:
208:
1251:
http://www.sfbc.com/ecom/pages/nm/product/productDetail.jsp?skuId=1000846474
511:
1012:
1008:
980:
968:
920:
835:
Ooops, so you have. My mistake. Nice work with the templates and stuff.
1345:
1326:
1190:
1165:
1145:
1106:
1092:
1073:
1058:
1043:
1024:
1002:
957:
942:
906:
880:
844:
806:
772:
742:
707:
688:
666:
646:
616:
597:
567:
551:
417:
364:
360:
979:
and what we've got here is about the very limit of their usefulness.
1153:
Here is one which is by a well known site but is "technically" a blog
539:, and are just as important, as fantasy was on a downward spiral.
238:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
356:
1080:
861:
To me it looks as though the issue should still be subject to
514:
472:
141:
122:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
99:
440:
416:
355:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
263:
1380:
Mid-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
1241:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1173:
Forge of Darkness by Steven Erikson (Kharkanas Trilogy #1)
1201:
77:
1336:
Why is there no section or even mention of criticism?
893:
tells me that they are reliable. My understanding of
51:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
1375:
B-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
1273:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1420:Low-importance Science fiction novels articles
1259:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
911:Youtube would probably best be described as
1385:Arts and entertainment work group articles
1229:I have just modified one external link on
291:
173:
56:
15:
1410:High-importance Fantasy fiction articles
1415:B-Class Science fiction novels articles
698:been a long and annoying day. Regards,
377:to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
293:
175:
145:
1204:I'll make a comment here later today.
1156:reliable source the better. Regards,
275:the arts and entertainment work group
248:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography
33:Language and literature good articles
7:
349:This article is within the scope of
224:This article is within the scope of
1365:Biography articles of living people
542:Anybody disagree with the changes?
164:It is of interest to the following
1135:and they're still in the article!!
383:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Novels
14:
1233:. Please take a moment to review
1405:B-Class Fantasy fiction articles
477:
336:
326:
295:
211:
201:
177:
146:
105:This article must adhere to the
19:
403:This article has been rated as
1400:High-importance novel articles
1390:WikiProject Biography articles
251:Template:WikiProject Biography
37:nominee, but did not meet the
1:
1327:14:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
915:(possibly more appropriate -
552:16:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
449:This article is supported by
425:This article is supported by
272:This article is supported by
108:biographies of living persons
1360:Former good article nominees
1346:23:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
1217:14:37, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
236:contribute to the discussion
1425:WikiProject Novels articles
1166:18:07, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
1146:20:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
1107:20:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
1093:19:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
1074:18:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
1059:18:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
1044:18:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
1025:17:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
1003:17:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
958:16:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
943:16:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
907:12:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
881:08:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
845:21:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
807:21:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
773:21:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
743:18:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
708:16:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
689:16:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
386:Template:WikiProject Novels
120:must be removed immediately
1441:
1370:B-Class biography articles
1290:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1226:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
667:18:50, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
647:18:42, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
452:Science fiction task force
409:project's importance scale
374:general Project discussion
45:. Editors may also seek a
1195:
1191:06:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
975:use them, but ideally we
617:19:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
598:22:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
568:22:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
448:
424:
402:
321:
271:
196:
172:
59:
55:
990:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
930:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
1222:External links modified
1007:I very much agree with
1395:B-Class novel articles
445:
421:
268:
190:Arts and Entertainment
154:This article is rated
1196:Donaldson's assesment
531:The Lord of the Rings
444:
420:
267:
227:WikiProject Biography
158:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
39:good article criteria
1271:regular verification
1151:Forgot to add them.
85:Good article nominee
1261:After February 2018
629:In my view, as per
1315:InternetArchiveBot
1266:InternetArchiveBot
446:
428:Fantasy task force
422:
352:WikiProject Novels
269:
254:biography articles
160:content assessment
60:Article milestones
1291:
1215:
1136:
1015:for the rewrite.
991:
931:
523:Importance Level.
520:
519:
501:
500:
471:
470:
467:
466:
463:
462:
290:
289:
286:
285:
140:
139:
98:
97:
94:
93:
1432:
1325:
1316:
1289:
1288:
1267:
1214:
1212:
1205:
1200:With respect to
1134:
999:
983:
965:reliable sources
939:
923:
869:
865:and similar. ::
687:
685:
679:
625:Reliable sources
593:
586:
581:
515:
492:
491:
481:
473:
391:
390:
387:
384:
381:
346:
341:
340:
330:
323:
322:
317:
314:
299:
292:
256:
255:
252:
249:
246:
232:join the project
221:
219:Biography portal
216:
215:
214:
205:
198:
197:
192:
181:
174:
157:
151:
150:
142:
128:this noticeboard
100:
80:
78:October 31, 2009
57:
23:
16:
1440:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1350:
1349:
1334:
1319:
1314:
1282:
1275:have permission
1265:
1239:this simple FaQ
1224:
1208:
1206:
1198:
1175:
1032:reliable source
1000:
997:
940:
937:
878:
867:
683:
681:
677:
673:reliable source
627:
596:
591:
582:
577:
525:
516:
510:
486:
433:High-importance
405:High-importance
388:
385:
382:
379:
378:
342:
335:
316:High‑importance
315:
305:
253:
250:
247:
244:
243:
217:
212:
210:
187:
155:
76:
12:
11:
5:
1438:
1436:
1428:
1427:
1422:
1417:
1412:
1407:
1402:
1397:
1392:
1387:
1382:
1377:
1372:
1367:
1362:
1352:
1351:
1338:142.181.247.43
1333:
1330:
1309:
1308:
1301:
1254:
1253:
1245:Added archive
1231:Steven Erikson
1223:
1220:
1197:
1194:
1174:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
996:
936:
913:self-published
876:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
626:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
601:
600:
588:
571:
570:
524:
521:
518:
517:
512:
508:
506:
503:
502:
499:
498:
488:
487:
482:
476:
469:
468:
465:
464:
461:
460:
457:Low-importance
447:
437:
436:
423:
413:
412:
401:
395:
394:
392:
389:novel articles
348:
347:
331:
319:
318:
300:
288:
287:
284:
283:
280:Mid-importance
270:
260:
259:
257:
223:
222:
206:
194:
193:
182:
170:
169:
163:
152:
138:
137:
133:this help page
117:poorly sourced
103:
96:
95:
92:
91:
88:
81:
73:
72:
69:
66:
62:
61:
53:
52:
27:Steven Erikson
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1437:
1426:
1423:
1421:
1418:
1416:
1413:
1411:
1408:
1406:
1403:
1401:
1398:
1396:
1393:
1391:
1388:
1386:
1383:
1381:
1378:
1376:
1373:
1371:
1368:
1366:
1363:
1361:
1358:
1357:
1355:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1331:
1329:
1328:
1323:
1318:
1317:
1306:
1302:
1299:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1286:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1262:
1257:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1221:
1219:
1218:
1213:
1211:
1203:
1193:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1183:Trevor coelho
1180:
1172:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1138:Truthkeeper88
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1085:Truthkeeper88
1082:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1017:Truthkeeper88
1014:
1010:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1001:
993:
989:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
961:
960:
959:
955:
951:
946:
945:
944:
941:
933:
929:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
909:
908:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
883:
882:
879:
873:
870:
864:
863:WP:Verifiable
860:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
808:
804:
800:
799:Truthkeeper88
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
774:
770:
766:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
744:
740:
736:
735:Truthkeeper88
732:
728:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
709:
705:
701:
696:
692:
691:
690:
686:
680:
674:
670:
669:
668:
664:
660:
656:
651:
650:
649:
648:
644:
640:
639:Truthkeeper88
636:
632:
624:
618:
614:
610:
605:
604:
603:
602:
599:
595:
594:
587:
585:
580:
573:
572:
569:
565:
561:
556:
555:
554:
553:
549:
545:
540:
538:
534:
532:
522:
505:
504:
497:
494:
493:
490:
489:
485:
480:
475:
474:
458:
455:(assessed as
454:
453:
443:
439:
438:
434:
431:(assessed as
430:
429:
419:
415:
414:
410:
406:
400:
397:
396:
393:
376:
375:
370:
369:short stories
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:
345:
344:Novels portal
339:
334:
332:
329:
325:
324:
320:
313:
309:
304:
301:
298:
294:
281:
278:(assessed as
277:
276:
266:
262:
261:
258:
241:
240:documentation
237:
233:
229:
228:
220:
209:
207:
204:
200:
199:
195:
191:
186:
183:
180:
176:
171:
167:
161:
153:
149:
144:
143:
135:
134:
129:
125:
121:
118:
114:
110:
109:
104:
102:
101:
89:
87:
86:
82:
79:
75:
74:
70:
67:
64:
63:
58:
54:
50:
49:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1335:
1313:
1310:
1285:source check
1264:
1258:
1255:
1228:
1225:
1209:
1202:this content
1199:
1176:
1131:
976:
972:
964:
891:common sense
695:common sense
628:
590:
583:
578:
541:
529:
526:
483:
450:
426:
404:
372:
350:
273:
225:
166:WikiProjects
131:
119:
112:
106:
84:
83:
48:reassessment
46:
31:
30:
26:
868:Kevinalewis
678:Pmlineditor
43:renominated
1354:Categories
1332:Criticism?
1322:Report bug
1210:Sandstein
917:WP:SELFPUB
895:WP:YOUTUBE
731:WP:YOUTUBE
655:WP:YOUTUBE
635:WP:YOUTUBE
365:novelettes
90:Not listed
1305:this tool
1298:this tool
977:shouldn't
537:Tolkien's
496:Archive 1
245:Biography
185:Biography
124:libellous
1311:Cheers.—
1179:this one
969:Monsanto
609:Werthead
560:Werthead
484:Archives
361:novellas
1235:my edit
998:complex
938:complex
407:on the
308:Fantasy
156:B-class
68:Process
1158:Alan16
1099:Alan16
1066:Alan16
1051:Alan16
1036:Alan16
950:Alan16
899:Alan16
877:(Desk)
837:Alan16
765:Alan16
700:Alan16
659:Alan16
544:Alan16
380:Novels
357:novels
312:Sci-fi
303:Novels
162:scale.
71:Result
29:was a
727:WP:RS
631:WP:RS
592:count
1342:talk
1187:talk
1162:talk
1142:talk
1103:talk
1089:talk
1081:here
1070:talk
1055:talk
1040:talk
1021:talk
954:talk
903:talk
841:talk
803:talk
769:talk
739:talk
729:and
704:talk
684:Talk
663:talk
643:talk
633:and
613:talk
579:Alan
564:talk
548:talk
399:High
367:and
234:and
65:Date
1279:RfC
1249:to
1013:WLU
1009:WLU
988:(c)
985:(t)
981:WLU
973:can
928:(c)
925:(t)
921:WLU
113:BLP
1356::
1344:)
1292:.
1287:}}
1283:{{
1189:)
1164:)
1144:)
1105:)
1091:)
1072:)
1057:)
1042:)
1034:.
1023:)
956:)
905:)
887:RS
871::
843:)
805:)
771:)
741:)
706:)
665:)
645:)
615:)
584:16
566:)
550:)
459:).
435:).
363:,
359:,
310:/
306::
282:).
188::
1340:(
1324:)
1320:(
1307:.
1300:.
1185:(
1168:.
1160:(
1140:(
1101:(
1087:(
1068:(
1053:(
1038:(
1019:(
994:/
952:(
934:/
901:(
874:/
839:(
801:(
767:(
737:(
710:.
702:(
661:(
641:(
611:(
562:(
546:(
533:'
411:.
242:.
168::
136:.
111:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
