510:
maintaining an overall uniform image density rather than logical connection to the text — this is a flaw, but a minor one. Most images are well below featured image quality but that is not an obstacle to GA. The one image that most catches my eye (and is noticeably higher quality than the others) is the aerial, "Surrogate's Court
Splendor". You could consider moving that up to lead image; however there's no actual problem with the current lead image, which appropriately depicts the whole building as it would be seen from street level, so this would be purely a discretionary change rather than something that should affect the GA review outcome.
526:
504:
482:
442:
416:
391:
370:
344:
323:
305:
275:
242:
199:
53:
247:
Article is not tagged as being in need of cleanup. Everything in the lead appears to be a proper summary of material expanded later, and does not need its own sourcing. No issues with peacock wording, fiction is irrelevant, and there are no incorporated lists. The overall organization of the article
509:
The overall level of illustration is appropriate to the article, and in sections where there is an obvious subtopic to be illustrated, an appropriate image has been chosen. The remaining images are a diverse enough selection to all be worth including, and their placement appears to be based on
280:
References are consistently formatted in
Citation Style 1 with short footnotes to a "sources" subsection for works that are repeatedly cited with different page numbers. This is a consistent citation style and one that is appropriate for the large number of
396:
Although the article does go into significant levels of detail about the decoration of the building and the politics of its construction, I think this level of detail is appropriate for its landmark status and the historical significance of those political
487:
All media are from commons. Some of them (e.g. the ceiling mosaic detail) display individual artwork rather than the overall building, which would be a problem for recent artworks, but given the date of construction I believe these works are all out of
310:
All references appear to be reliable sources, and there is no overreliance on any single source. Although some of this material appears to have been contentious at the time of construction, it is not so any more. All quotations are properly marked and
531:
A very smooth nomination. Almost nothing to do, and the only suggestions I have are so minor that I don't think approval needs to be delayed for them. Congratulations on a well-written article! —
58:
421:
Most of the article is purely factual, with the opinions reserved for the "Critical reception" section, and properly attributed and neutrally described within that section.
137:
232:
91:
133:
81:
63:
118:
472:
349:
Earwig found significant copying involving two web sites, but examining the dates and content shows that they copied from us rather than vice versa.
299:
236:
228:
110:
220:
294:, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
328:
All content appears to be properly referenced. Spot checking found that the content of our article was accurately sourced to its references.
167:
177:
295:
224:
204:
On the whole very good. I found a doubled period near the end of "Upper stories", a missing wikilink on the first occurrence of
86:
447:
The article underwent a major expansion by the nominator last
September. Both before and since then it has been quite stable.
317:
17:
37:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
554:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
126:
476:
494:
287:
216:
536:
464:
210:, and basically no other needed copyedits. These are so minor that I don't think they should block GA approval.
161:
103:
468:
385:
257:
381:
364:
248:
is logical and the standard sections that one would expect in any article are in their standard order.
338:
334:
532:
157:
498:
436:
298:, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
268:
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
456:
206:
540:
181:
171:
413:
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
406:
269:
291:
196:
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
435:
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
145:
114:
8:
384:without going into unnecessary detail (see
41:
72:
44:
7:
33:The following discussion is closed.
454:Is it illustrated, if possible, by
24:
550:The discussion above is closed.
524:
502:
480:
440:
414:
389:
368:
342:
321:
303:
273:
240:
197:
18:Talk:Surrogate's Courthouse
300:scientific citation guidelines
1:
541:02:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
525:
503:
481:
441:
415:
390:
369:
343:
322:
304:
274:
241:
198:
172:01:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
569:
375:No obvious topics missing.
270:the layout style guideline
473:valid fair use rationales
552:Please do not modify it.
215:B. It complies with the
35:Please do not modify it.
497:to the topic, and have
296:likely to be challenged
358:broad in its coverage
439:or content dispute:
382:focused on the topic
363:A. It addresses the
335:copyright violations
318:no original research
263:no original research
333:D. It contains no
237:list incorporation
36:
499:suitable captions
475:are provided for
288:in-line citations
100:
99:
34:
560:
528:
527:
506:
505:
484:
483:
477:non-free content
469:copyright status
444:
443:
418:
417:
393:
392:
372:
371:
346:
345:
325:
324:
307:
306:
292:reliable sources
277:
276:
244:
243:
207:New-York Tribune
201:
200:
150:
141:
122:
54:Copyvio detector
42:
568:
567:
563:
562:
561:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
316:C. It contains
219:guidelines for
217:manual of style
131:
108:
102:
96:
68:
39:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
566:
564:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
533:David Eppstein
523:Pass or Fail:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
493:B. Images are
491:
490:
489:
463:A. Images are
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
378:
377:
376:
367:of the topic:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
331:
330:
329:
314:
313:
312:
284:
283:
282:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
229:words to watch
213:
212:
211:
158:David Eppstein
151:
98:
97:
95:
94:
89:
84:
78:
75:
74:
70:
69:
67:
66:
64:External links
61:
56:
50:
47:
46:
40:
31:
30:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
565:
553:
542:
538:
534:
530:
529:
522:
521:
519:
516:
508:
507:
500:
496:
492:
486:
485:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
461:
459:
458:
453:
446:
445:
438:
434:
433:
431:
427:
420:
419:
412:
411:
409:
408:
403:
395:
394:
387:
386:summary style
383:
379:
374:
373:
366:
362:
361:
359:
355:
348:
347:
340:
336:
332:
327:
326:
319:
315:
309:
308:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
279:
278:
271:
267:
266:
264:
260:
259:
254:
246:
245:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
221:lead sections
218:
214:
209:
208:
203:
202:
195:
194:
192:
188:
187:
186:
185:
183:
180:review – see
179:
174:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
107:
106:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
77:
76:
71:
65:
62:
60:
57:
55:
52:
51:
49:
48:
43:
38:
26:
19:
551:
517:
455:
429:
405:
380:B. It stays
365:main aspects
357:
262:
256:
205:
191:well written
190:
184:for criteria
176:
175:
164:
154:
153:
146:
142:
128:Article talk
127:
123:
104:
101:
92:Instructions
32:
467:with their
281:references.
115:visual edit
488:copyright.
339:plagiarism
258:verifiable
59:Authorship
45:GA toolbox
397:disputes.
290:are from
155:Reviewer:
82:Templates
73:Reviewing
27:GA Review
495:relevant
437:edit war
182:WP:WIAGA
168:contribs
87:Criteria
518:Overall
407:neutral
286:B. All
233:fiction
138:history
119:history
105:Article
471:, and
465:tagged
457:images
430:stable
428:Is it
404:Is it
356:Is it
311:cited.
255:Is it
235:, and
225:layout
189:Is it
261:with
147:Watch
16:<
537:talk
337:nor
162:talk
134:edit
111:edit
388:):
539:)
520::
501::
479::
460:?
432:?
410:?
360:?
341::
320::
302::
272::
265:?
239::
231:,
227:,
223:,
193:?
178:GA
170:)
136:|
117:|
113:|
535:(
165:·
160:(
143:·
140:)
132:(
124:·
121:)
109:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.