Knowledge

Talk:Symmedian

Source đź“ť

191:
re-written and checked for clarity by a smart person who is not a mathematician. There is too much jargon that only mathematicians and geometers understand. For example, 50% of the opening paragraph is dedicated to establishing arcane trivia about who 'invented' these things (can you invent a geometric property?) The graphic is confusing to the point that it is useless. I can see that there are points K, I, and G in there somewhere, and that they are close but not colocated. How are they calculated? I am willing to bet my shirt each of these things can be coherently described without conjuring the name of a 19th century French dude. Simply state the geometric elements involved! Instead, there is a brief paragraph below that attempts to say something, but speaks in such cryptic jargon as to defeat any possible communication.
84: 74: 53: 22: 190:
I came to this page aiming to learn what a symmedian point of a triangle is, because it is apparently used in constructing Steiner points. This article only succeeds in frustrating me. If a PhD candidate in a technical field can't make heads or tails of this, I think it should probably be completely
217:) To construct one, start with a median of the triangle (a line connecting one vertex with the midpoint of the opposite side) then reflect it over the corresponding angle bisector (the line through the same vertex that divides the angle of the triangle there in two equal parts) ( 140: 284:
and unscientific. I don't see why someone added the expert tag- this seems like a simple enough concept for us common Wiki editors to handle.. I vote for deleting the expert tag. -
298:
I can't see why special would seem unscientific. There's no judgement implied in this word, there are a number of certain "special" point and lines in geometry, such as
346: 130: 341: 106: 192: 236: 182: 97: 58: 33: 255: 196: 21: 323: 240: 303: 163: 319: 289: 251: 178: 39: 250:
I find this an excellent article...the only unclear point is the word "reflect" - what does this mean ?
83: 174: 232: 170: 270: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89: 73: 52: 285: 281: 266: 335: 299: 265:
I agree, it's difficult. I tried rephrasing it but it's still not an easy read.
219:
First, this doesn't make any sense, and second it belongs in the second paragraph
307: 102: 311: 79: 315: 205:
I have a few problems with this opening... allow me to elaborate
327: 318:, and the word special is used with the same meaning there too. 293: 274: 259: 244: 200: 15: 229:
Well, actually it does make sense, but it could be clearer.
162:
I added some motivation to the beginning of the article. (
215:
What do you mean special?! What is the point of them
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 213:
geometrical lines associated with every triangle. (
8: 19: 47: 49: 221:) The resulting line is a symmedian ( 7: 314:. See, for instance, the article on 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 347:Low-priority mathematics articles 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 342:Start-Class mathematics articles 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 135:This article has been rated as 1: 280:"Special" does seem a little 201:15:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 363: 134: 67: 46: 328:22:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 294:17:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 275:17:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 260:15:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 245:02:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 141:project's priority scale 98:WikiProject Mathematics 304:perpendicular bisector 166:) 28 July 2012 (UTC) 28:This article is rated 209:Symmedians are three 121:mathematics articles 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 247: 235:comment added by 187: 173:comment added by 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 354: 252:Cinnamon colbert 230: 186: 167: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 362: 361: 357: 356: 355: 353: 352: 351: 332: 331: 168: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 360: 358: 350: 349: 344: 334: 333: 278: 277: 228: 208: 193:72.225.131.167 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 359: 348: 345: 343: 340: 339: 337: 330: 329: 325: 321: 320:Pablo.emanuel 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 296: 295: 291: 287: 283: 276: 272: 268: 264: 263: 262: 261: 257: 253: 248: 246: 242: 238: 237:24.218.18.121 234: 226: 224: 223:Gee thanks... 220: 216: 212: 206: 203: 202: 198: 194: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 165: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 300:circumcenter 297: 279: 249: 227: 222: 218: 214: 210: 207: 204: 189: 169:— Preceding 161: 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 308:orthocenter 231:—Preceding 175:Silversheep 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 30:Start-class 336:Categories 312:barycenter 316:triangles 267:Tempshill 158:Symmedian 233:unsigned 183:contribs 171:unsigned 211:special 139:on the 36:scale. 324:talk 310:and 290:talk 286:Eric 282:NPOV 271:talk 256:talk 241:talk 197:talk 179:talk 164:talk 225:). 131:Low 338:: 326:) 306:, 302:, 292:) 273:) 258:) 243:) 199:) 185:) 181:• 322:( 288:( 269:( 254:( 239:( 195:( 177:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
talk
unsigned
Silversheep
talk
contribs
72.225.131.167
talk
15:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
24.218.18.121
talk
02:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Cinnamon colbert
talk
15:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Tempshill
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑