Talk:Point Isabel Regional Shoreline

1156:

Its a living article, even if it became a feature article it very well may get messay once again if someone adds in new information due to the mere fact that time goes on and new information becomes available, just relax and chill. Interpretations can be wrong, i.e. getting a joke or not getting a joke, recognizing sarcasm or missing the point. Wow we really can't agree on anything can we? Huge mess? That B.S. and you know it, the only huge mess is your interpretation if this article. Of all the articles you edit, this is probably one of the better written ones. And quit your complaining all you do is renmove content without adding in anything meaningful or giving any useful commentary besides this article sucks, cholga you write like a Junior High School Kids, blah blah blah. Give it a rest and either help out, or stop detracting from constructive edits and get lost. All you say is so negative, wikipedia will never be a good encyclopedia nor will this article unless you stop calling wikipedia a touch feely social club, which is just incorrect in so many ways and focus on the positive, how can we improve, this is a gerund this is not, did you know that? would you like help with... But persisting here at Point Isabel which youve even said above on this page you don't even care about it at all and are not interested, why bother? what's your motivation besides your spite for me, somthing which many people have called you on? Anyways enough said, and sorry if anyone is offended none is intended; and also for the convoluted reply to both of you, the critizism is entirely directed at IL2BA.

1810:, she was from Modesto, was dumped in the Berkeley Marina and washed up at Point Isabel. The article on the book supsoatory and school where kennedy was shot mention it, because it was a major event, it amde national headlines and so did Laci. CNN is not a tabloid, and neither is NBC, ABC, CBC, MSNBC, CNBC, Univisión, Telemundo, PBS, the AP, Reuters, or any other news agency that covered her corpse washing up at this park, none of those are tabloids. Tabloids don't cover such facts, they make up conspiracies and myths to sell their rag-mags, if anything the tabloids might start to say her ghost is terrifying peoples dogs at the park, somthing silly like that. This is not just anything, this was probably the biggest case in the bay area since the zodiac murders, every site of each murder and body recovery who have an article mention what happened there. There is precedant for such inclusions. I think this will compell you to agree this does belong here. You are very mistaken if you think the Laci Peterson murder is a tabloid affair. Goggle her, you wont see many tabloid news coverage, youll see a lot of serious coverage, also see 1537:

sentance regarding bags used to collect the very contensious word I'm asking we both stop using towards or relating to one another in an unfriendly manner? I am still having trouble what you mean by a 50-cent word, because the link you gave me connected me to weasel words and that doesn't seem to be your use of the term 50-cent. Would you just break it down for me and explain what that term means to you so that you may get your point accross more effectively so we may quickly resolve this "point of centention" between us, and hopefully (pwwwease) civily? Well and what did you think that i said was ad hominem, that is bombastically argueing against you and not for the point-at-hand. Let's get along =)

999:

request that you try to refrain from being rude. I can accept that this person is generally not nice, but I can make my own conclusions, thank you. It's just not nice to insult people, whether the insult is true or not. I will be considerate and honest with everyone here, and I expect the same courtesy from ILike2BeAnonymous. I don't mean to be insulting: if I am I apologize immediatly. One more point is that the copy-edit template belongs on the article page. It's not really important, but still. I'm currently editing another article, but I'll get to this one in about half an hour, possibly more. Best regards.--

988:

award for best dog park. One user seems to think the word poop was innaproproate but was not bothered enough to remove it, i felt it was fine since other synomyms were exhauasted such as extrement, stool, feces, wastae etc. and the references San Francisco Chronicle uses it. I should warn you to watch out for ILike2BeAnonymous as S/he is a very crass editdor with poor diologue and consensus skills and is generally overbearing and arogant and this user is frequently warned for his frequently unfortunate choice of words and pompous editing

1141:

a little kid boys are mean to you if they like you, so that's my theory. But then again I might just be trying to make light of the situation with a joke (wink wink). IL2BA is generally just as rude to me as he is to anyone that disagrees with him, but there will be harmony someday. On the plus side all the arguing seems to result in near perfect writing, facts, sources... ... ... wait for it... ... ...wait for it... ... wait... wait...eventually. All theatrics aside and apparent agression aside this is just wikipedia even if it

1780:. If one goes by the standard that anything that happens in, or is associated with, a certain place is "notable", then yes, it should be included; if, however, one sets standards as to which things like this are worthy of mention and which are simply coincidences that really have nothing to do with the place itself (which is what I believe), then this doesn't belong here. To me, the Laci Peterson affair is on the level of tabloid news coverage, and therefore is not appropriate here. + 917:

love to never have to deal with you again, hows that sounf IL2BA No more Cholga Or QRC or Chris since you seem to think were all the same person, of course anyone that disagrees with you must be one person, multiple people would never dislike you, oh wait look at your talk page its full of warnings did I put them all there? Just go away or heres a thought don't be rude and confrontational and you recently called me ornery but youre the arguementative combative one not I.

1147:". Oh you kids! And you interperted it just fine, me and IL2BA are just probably polar opposites I reckon I was raised by nurturing/indulgant/negligent parents and he was raised by strict parents or some other dichotoy which makes us utterly incompatable with regards to chemistry and agreement. As for the edit wars, what edit wars, that died down a while ago here. Although I really hope fundraise vs. raise funds isn'nt blown up by him á la 174: 80: 53: 231: 210: 90: 162: 22: 396:. It's listed as 160 acres total, but that includes on-leash unfenced area. Using mapping tools I can say for sure that the off-leash completely fenced area is at least 60 and possibly as big as 75 sq. acres. I realize that's original research, however it's enough for me to remove the well-sourced, though incorrect statement that it's U.S.'s largest. 1797:

personal meter that should be used here. I also object to the notion that this is a factoid, its a notable event that happened at the park. the park happened to be where she washed up, the berkeley marina happened to be where she was dumped from, she happened to live in Modesto, shes mentioned in the

1140:

Well IL2BA is basically in love with me and that's why he follows me around some article I frequently edit or have created after a previous arguement has subsided so he can be close to me. Well thats one theory of mine, since he's very rude and crass...uncivil and beligerant to myself and when you're

977:

Actually, copy-editing involves fixing grammer, spelling, punctuation, and general content of the article. Nothing will be removed unless it violates NPOV, or is innapropriate. I will begin copy-editing in a short while, but just right now I would like to know if there is anything I need to watch out

673:

Thank you for your very helpful comments Fizbin I wish others would be as helpful in helping me with my Junior Highesque writting instead of relentlessly carrying on Elemantary Schoolesque vendettas and using smug pompous childish writting and antics to make themselves feel superior. I'll get to work

656:

Marin County mountains, San Francisco and the Golden Gate Bridge”, which are actually three viewable items (not to mention I’ve never really heard the term ‘Marin County mountains’ and would personally replace it with 'Mount Tamalpais'). (This could alternatively be read to mean that you can see both

651:

On the other hand, that said, this article does require extensive copy editing assistance. The first paragraph, for example, has a number of run-on sentences, including the very first one, that should be broken up with commas or split into multiple sentences. It (the first paragraph still) has a kind

1198:

Hey IL2BA I must insist that fundraise not only sounds better, but is just as gramatically correct as raise funds; and as such should be used as originally written. I know you are acting in good faith and must simply be misguided and think that it is not a word. You probably came to that belief at a

1122:

The average messiness of the article is not important (in this particular discussion). What I'm concerned about is the air of semi-hostility and tension here (no offence, that's just the vibes I'm getting). I am going to get around to working on the article, but I can't do that if there are going to

998:

Okay, thanks for that. I'll keep it in mind as I edit. I read over this page, and read ILike2BeAnonymous's talk page, and your talk page as well. (One of my habits. I get bored rapidly unless I have something to read. Nothing against you or ILike2BeAnonymous personally.) Warning noted, but I have to

732:

While I agreed that the article needs work, I did so in a much more helpful fashion than you ever do, using an encouraging tone and providing concrete examples. Just condescendingly indicating that an article needs work is not significantly furthering the process of developing well-written articles.

1828:

There is a disagreement wether this information should be included in this article between myself Cholga and ILike2BeAnonymous which opposes its inclusion. The rationales are apparant within recent edit summaries and the discussion above this section which has died. May we try and find a definitive

1531:

I'm sorry but on close inspection I don't see what part of my arguement you find to be an attack on you? I commented on how I believe that wikipedia doesn't use the standards of typical english usage rather is uses the most proper and accurate academic wordings whenever possible or it strives to do

1155:

owntown Richmond was. But even if it is, this is just wikipedia, its an arguement that may have to happen to reach consensus and prevent a real edit war. And what pray tell is so messy about this article at this point, I think it would reasonably get graded as B+ or A- if we were to use that scale.

1018:

to be on the article page, or is that just a general guideline and not a solid rule, do we have any leeway? I think most of those templates maybe excluding "copntrovertial" "grossly unreferenced" or "current" should go on talk pages instead since they are very visually distracting. Hmm maybe at the

806:

to avoid these squabbles? or do you enjoy them? I should point out that the template never belonged here until Fizbin made his suggestions for improvements because policy states that tags such as copyedit placed arbitralily on articles without talk page explanations may be removed if anyone objects

633:

which I think is fine. And the user that complained didn't seem to think it was an important enough detail to alter the word themselves so I don't see a point in a copyedit template for an article that's been copyedited a dozen times allready but not by the person who insists on adding the template.

632:

I can't believe we're still on this, a copedit template is not at all necessary at this point. I haven't seen one mistake pointed out, gramatical or spelling or otherwise its placement is entirely arbitrary at this point. The only thing that was not removed from previous complains was the word poop

916:

Never deal with vandalism, but you've accused me of vandalism and reverted it before. Four letter word that starts with an L, or am I refreshing your memory. Take a chill pill dude, turn your computer off for a few days and stay away from me when you come back, I'll stay away from you too! I would

1536:

interpretation instead of the general understanding. But i will take it with a grain of salt and hope both I and you may enjoy your advice and not go the ad hominem route, maybe we can avoid the use of the word "shit" and its derivatives too? Even if we are ironically debating the word usage in a

1424:

What do you mean by "slack cut" I am a native english speaker in addition to being a native spanish speaker. Typical usage seems very subjective to me and who decides what that is exactly? seems like OR to me dude. "What most people say" or rather how most people speak is not the form in which we

1761:

murder's disposal of a bodu occured here it would be important to mention. Maybe if someone was robber at the park in 1983 for 200$ in their wallet it wouldn't be, but this is well sourced information. Laci Peterson+Point Isabel gets a lot of google newshits 4 years later, not from some library

1044:

I was looking through this article, and it seems to me that it requires a lot more then just copy-editing. It needs major clean-up, rather then just spelling, grammer, and prose fixes. I'm going to change the template to read that. It's rather jumbled and confusing, and could easily be made into

987:

The only arguement was a ludacrous arguement over the park not being a dog park since people also go there. But this was only the strange observation of a single editor and consensus was that if its own website states it is the biggest off leash dog park in the world and that it had won the PETA

1145:

tense it's not a big deal in the whole scheme of daily life. Funny you should mention the random smile, I gave IL2BA one on his talk page as a peace offering but he removed it, and although its probably vandalism to remove that, It wasn't exactly a comment so I let it go, in any case just flip

1860:

Exclude. I agree that this is really trivia. As Milkbreath says, this will soon be forgotten and does not deserve to be immortalized in an encyclopedia article. Just because Ms. Peterson is mentioned in the article on the Berkeley Pier doesn't mean that the mistake should be repeated here.

548:

I replaced the template, since you didn't copy edit the page; all you did was correct spelling errors. There's lots more wrong: "dog poop"; run-on sentences; just plain bad writing. You should learn the difference between proofreading and fixing spelling errors and copy editing; two different

1410:

It's not the typical English usage of the term. If one is handing out things such as mutt mitts at a park, one provides or distributes them; most people would not say that they are being allocated. "Allocation" is used for such things as allocating money in a budget for a certain purpose, or

569:

Would you point out a run on? The San Francisco Chronicle uses the word poop, excrement, feces, and stool are also used in the article, using synonyms refreshes the tone and repetiveness dries it up. On another note I think we should move that template to the talk page since it is a visual

1672:

Nobody, so far as I know, assumes that this, or any other such figure here, is exact. And please show us one other article here that uses the "~" symbol in such a way to show approximation with figures such as these (measures of parks and similar areas). All such figures are assumed to be

1411:

allocating resources in a planning process, not giving small items out to the public. You need to go beyond just what the dictionary says about a particular term; there's the issue of context and conventions of usage. (Slack cut if you're not a native English speaker on this last point.) +

652:

of disjointed narrative about it. For example, there are multiple mentions of the dog park (largest, and the PETA ranking) separated by other random non-dog-park info. It (we are still on the first paragraph) includes other basic grammatical errors, such as the mention of “views of

674:

on those suggestions then. The sources say Marin County mountains that is why I used that term since in the past making simple and obvious assumptions such as Marin County mountains meaning Mt. Tam was used to accuse me of Original Research and then the whole comment was removed.

1706:

I don't think this is "tabloid trivia" rather since it is such a noted murder i think it should me mentioned in the article that her remains where found at point isabel. I remember seeing the reports, in fact i was at the park when reporters where there, whilst walking my

1842:

Exclude. Ten years from now nobody will know who the Petersons were. Their murders, however tragic, are not historically noteworthy. Sadly, that sort of thing happens all the time. When I read the section for the first time, that factoid seemed to come out of left field.

1019:

bottom of the page or maybe resize them considerablly with a small (save page) sized box with a show button, maybe every article should bundle multiple templates like that together? any thoughts? should it be removed off the talk page so as to avoid superfalousy?

688:

Well, you just elucidated pretty well what's wrong with the article, any imagined "vindictiveness" aside. It's just a mess, grammatically, syntactically and just in terms of being a cohesive "encyclopedia" article. I mean, aren't we supposed to at least

1557:

Does that mean you have not gotten anywhere fast yourself? Mr. Erases my comments, says/calls me "Shit-storms" "What Idiot Said" and "Sitting All Over", oh whats that, am I quoting the nice things you have said about me, hyprocrit. So yeah dude, what

1647:

anyways, i still favor use of allocate and since no real arguement has been given besides the accusation of ad hominem attacks and sockpuppetry attempting to appear as me i will put it in. if any objecttions please discuss "CONTENT ONLY" here =)

1084:

You guys do argue a lot. I've been watching this page, and it just dosen't seem like either of you are enjoying yourselves. Tension is really running high. I've been looking for that 'Random Smile' template to put on here, but I can't find it.

443:

Just to head off another of Cholga's mini-shit storms, I've checked the references for Point Isabel, and none of them use the phrase "leash-free". I'm changing this to read "allows off-leash dogs", which is what the references say.

942:

I agree with Fizbin. Your presence only brings more confrontation. Perhaps you should leave wikipedia and Cholga alone if you think it is some sort of god damn project that requires you to waste your precious time dealing with it.

1105:'s "that's metaphysically absurd!"); and you're absolutely correct in your assessment of the relative importance of this so-called "encyclopedia" (more like a big touchy-feely social club on steroids). But the fact remains that 1270:"SYLLABICATION: fund·raise PRONUNCIATION: fndrz VARIANT FORMS: or fund-raise also fund raise INTRANSITIVE VERB: Inflected forms: fund·raised, fund·rais·ing, fund·rais·es To engage in fundraising."(American Heritage Dictionary) 881:

copy-editing, but in this particular case, it's demoralizing enough for me, on account of certain editors who continually introduce sloppy writing into the article, that I simply don't feel like dealing with it. So sue me.

1935:

Do other articles about places list every corpse ever found there? The place isn't really a significant element of Laci's story (since she was killed elsewhere and washed up here by chance), let alone the reverse.

187: 63: 523:

So tell us, Cholga: how many things are wrong with that sentence? Give us a number. It's your writing, I'm sure, which is why I'm asking you. The article is full of similar errors and problems, hence the tagging.

1613:

Um. Are you Cholga? You sounds like her by using the word "me". Because if you you operate a sockpuppet, you can get blocked for it. So I advise you not to do it, even if you are upset about the situation.

647:

On the one hand, I think that ILike2BeAnonymous is vindictively critical of articles that Cholga takes an active interest in, including this one, and is doing so in his usual rude and condescending way.

877:

here as an editor. Folks do what they want to do. For example, I don't consider myself a "janitor", and therefore I never deal with vandalism. There seem to be plenty of others who do that. I do do

1067:

Okay, this is much better. Much more organized. I might be able to copy-edit it, but don't expect me to be very fast. I'm kind of busy- HS is taking up a lot of time. I will do the best I can.--

1029:

Heh, well, most of that is so far out of my league I can't even begin to tell you. I can't do anything like that. It does sound like a good idea, but you'd have to take that to somebody else.

1400:

type situation it hands them out for a well "particular purpose" to pick up dog crap. See what i mean, allocate is more specific towards the mandatory and specific purpose of the mutt mitts.

1662:

How can you be so sure that this would be assumed, the 21 acres is an exact figure from the East Bay Regional Park District the hectares is just an estimate so it should be noted i think.

1999: 192: 1339:

so they can be said to provide them. The supplier of the mitts may allocate certain resources towards their production or distribution, but that's a horse of a different color. +

519:

The park has also been noted for being safe, vandalism free, and very clean, the mutt mitts and self policing by parkgoers has been credited for making it dog poop free aswell.

2004: 291: 1335:

That's because it sounds like a 50-cent word to you. It's neither more specific nor more encyclopedic; "provides" is better. Allocation is a different process; the park

1741:

The remains of Laci Peterson and her unborn fetus' Conner's corpse washed up, at two separate sites, on the shores of the park in 2003 from where they drifted from the

2024: 2019: 1994: 281: 1717:

The Peterson connection is relevant to the extent that many people in the Bay Area, myself included, had never heard of this park until she floated ashore there.--

1032: 848:

Ironically enough, while we both spend quality time discussing what is or is not wrong with this article, neither one of us feels much like actually fixing it!--

152: 1088:

Can everone here calm down? Knowledge (XXG) isn't really important, not in the big scheme of things. Don't get all worked up about one article, or one person.

1989: 142: 1920:(note - even so, I did so before I figured out there was a discussion here, so feel free to revert - mine is just another opinion like everyone else's) 1532:

so. When you wrote "that's because it sounds like a 50 cent word to you" reffering to me, see that sounds ad hominem to me, because you are focusing on

2014: 1905:

I've removed the information again. Totally inappropriate for the encyclopedia. This isn't a close call. We're not a catalog of dead body finds.

2009: 1950:

Most corpses don't have articles written about them, its of note since her body being found was a milestone in her disappearance's investigation.

1331:

allocates seems to be a better more specific and encyclopedic term to me, as it implies both supply and distribution.17:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

807:

and that you "should" explain on here which you still haven't. "Jr High writing" is not good enough, its very lazy much like 7th grader i would say

239: 215: 118: 763:

While you may often be (and definitely are not always) correct, your presentation encourages time-wasting confrontation rather than cooperation.--

515:

Since you (Cholga) seemed to take umbrage at the presence of this template, let me try this: here's a sentence from the article as it stands now:

1041:, "The following tags should be added to articles that need a cleanup. Unless otherwise noted, they should be placed at the top of the article." 780:

Your objections have been duly noted. Now can we get back to the matter at hand, such as those many run-on sentences you pointed out and such? +

1038: 1257:"–verb (used with object) 1. to collect by fund-raising: The charity needs to fund-raise more than a million dollars. (Unarbidged Dictionary) 1146:

through his recent history on his talk page and look for an edit summary to the effect of "I don't want Cholga's studpid smile <growl: -->

733:

In fact, it tends to lead to long pointless back-and-forths on talk pages, numerous edit wars, calling in of the administrative troops, etc.

1984: 1199:

time when it was not considered a word and was therefore in good faith that you removed it since you are uninformed of its wordiness, okay

459:

Seriously why would it have been named the #1 dog park in the country by peta, according to the parks own website if it werent a dog park!

362: 802:

Gimmie a break, duly noted, thats so dismissive I think, seriously I've reached out to you a lot of times and no answer don't you even

456:

No the source clearly states even in the article title as follows "Point Isabel Shoreline the largest off-leash dog park in the nation"

103: 58: 397: 379: 873:

Well, that's interesting, isn't it? It points out something important about this whole damn project (Knowledge (XXG)), which is that

1965: 1895: 1595:

If it's okay for him to say everything about me is shit, its okay for me to at the very least critisize him for his use of it.

1396:

those are the definitions according to my dictionary. see what i feel is that the park doesn't just make them available in an

33: 978:

for, or a specific point of contention in this article. If, while making my edits, I mess up, please tell me. Best regards.--

707:

I think it must be a lot of us imaging this vindictiveness, what's up with you popping up on every article I be editing yo?

501: 427: 603:

And no, fixing spelling errors and copyediting are not different. In fact, fixing spelling errors is part of copyediting.

179: 1798:

latter two, the matter of the fact is she didn't wash up in Albany or San Rafael and she similarly wasnt dumped from the

1368: 1306: 577: 478: 320: 378:

We have a 60-70 acres off-leash dog park in Verona, WI (Prairie Moraine Park). Can't find strong reference though.

1577:

Stop personal attack each other, both of you. The usage of the word "shit" is certainly not helping the situation.

1454:

in case you missed it). You cannot accept the slightest courtesy without shitting all over it. I give up. Sheesh. +

1772:

The question is (or should be, in any case) whether this factoid about Laci Peterson is relevant to this article

1692: 1638: 1619: 1582: 948: 608: 538: 1687:

It is a known fact that all measurements are not accurate here on Knowledge (XXG). WP:MOS has no such standard.

1251:"verb raise money for a cause or project; "We are fundraising for AIDS research"" (WordNet/Princeton University) 1753:

This text should be included because it has to do with a major climax in one of the crimes of the century, if

245: 39: 366: 1178: 1124: 1092: 1068: 1046: 1000: 979: 1953: 1883: 1356: 1294: 466: 1811: 1781: 1678: 1507: 1455: 1412: 1340: 1222: 1110: 883: 781: 694: 557: 525: 445: 401: 383: 1961: 1925: 1910: 1891: 1807: 1232: 1123:

be arguments and (minor) edit wars. I just want all hot tempers to cool down. Is that too much to ask?--

117:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

624: 660:

And really, I did not get to the end of comments that could be made about the first paragraph alone.--

1866: 1848: 1688: 1634: 1615: 1578: 1563: 944: 604: 534: 1876:

But as long as there is an article about her, shouldn't it be mentioned? Its part of the history of

1443: 21: 1921: 1906: 1803: 1762:

archive either. This was a major turning point on the Laci Paterson case and should be mentioned.

1596: 1567: 1969: 1945: 1941: 1929: 1914: 1899: 1870: 1852: 1833: 1818: 1784: 1766: 1731: 1721: 1711: 1696: 1681: 1666: 1652: 1642: 1633:

The above comments are consider trolling comments in Knowledge (XXG) and has been strike out.

1623: 1599: 1586: 1570: 1541: 1510: 1485: 1458: 1429: 1415: 1404: 1372: 1343: 1321: 1310: 1279: 1235: 1225: 1215: 1181: 1160: 1127: 1113: 1095: 1071: 1059: 1049: 1023: 1003: 992: 982: 964: 952: 921: 886: 852: 811: 784: 767: 749: 711: 697: 678: 664: 637: 627: 612: 583: 560: 542: 528: 448: 405: 393: 387: 370: 348: 336: 326: 95: 1957: 1887: 1364: 1302: 1102: 572: 474: 315: 1673:

approximations. The only exceptions would be for such exact figures as the definition of a

594:

Action speaks louder than words. So I don't care if you are the janitor or not, just do it.

1862: 1844: 1742: 1273: 556:. I don't fix vandalism here, and I don't fix stuff like this (unless I feel like it). + 1799: 1758: 1746: 1109:. Whether one cares about that or not, of course, is a horse of a different color ... + 256: 1425:

write, especially in an encyclopedia article, wouldnt you agree? The word is more apt.

1031:

I think putting the template on the article is just something you do. You can ask the

960:

I nominated for a copyediting team copyedit to get over this problem once and for all.

313:

Does anyone know if it is the largest dog park in the world in addition to the nation?

1978: 1473:

Well obviously you are not a native speaker of any decent dialect of English because

1101:

Far be it from me to tell you your interpretation of the situation is wrong (cf. the

657:

of the mountains in Marin County, which also does not make much sense in this case.)

341:

well at least it was weak and not unuseable, fortunatly i found a chronicle article!

332:

The current reference for the 'largest dog park' comment- judysbook - is very weak.--

250: 1289: 1937: 1754: 1246: 430:, by Glen Martin, San Francisco Chronicle, August 16, 2004, retrieved July 25, 2007 745:

I couldn't agree more and thank you for the encouragement and authorative comments

230: 209: 79: 52: 1718: 1360: 1298: 849: 764: 661: 470: 345: 333: 1503: 1267: 1177:...*blinks*...Ah. I see. ...Umm....I'm sorry you and IL2BA are incompatible?-- 169: 113: 108: 85: 1284: 623:

Well I definatly don't think it is neccisary now, I just copyedited it again.

1442:

That seems to be an argument for "allocated" since it's a 50-cent word; see

460: 359: 161: 693:

to something better than a junior-high-school level of writing here? +

428:

Point Isabel Shoreline the largest off-leash dog park in the nation

1674: 15: 1562:

your angle? No one likes a rudeness, so take some advice and

160: 1263:–verb (used without object) 2. to engage in fund-raising." 533:

I remove the template since I copyedited the page already.

1254:"To engage in fundraising."(American Heritage Dictionary ) 107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1091:

If I interpreted the situation wrong, please tell me.--

358:

Marymoor Park Redmond, WA - 40 acre off leash dog park

1749:, CNN, April 18, 2003, retrieved September 23, 2007) 1747:

Laci Peterson's remains identified; husband arrested

1450:you're not a native English speaker" (emphasis in 1035:. They might be able to help you more then I can. 1242:To ease your understanding look at these links. 1446:for more on this. And notice I said "slack cut 1221:Actually, wordiness is a perfectly good word. + 2000:Mid-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles 1506:arguments, which will get you nowhere, fast. + 1829:desicion on this topic and avoid an edit war? 1352:what is a 50-cent word? you mean the rapper? 8: 266:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Protected areas 2005:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles 204: 47: 1039:Knowledge (XXG):Template messages/Cleanup 1824:Laci Peterson remains - comments request 2025:Articles of WikiProject Protected areas 2020:Low-importance Protected areas articles 1995:C-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles 552:And no, I don't feel like fixing this. 494: 420: 206: 49: 19: 1045:several sections if sorted properly.-- 360:http://www.metrokc.gov/parks/marymoor/ 127:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject California 1677:or similar scientific measurements. + 257:protected natural or ecological areas 7: 269:Template:WikiProject Protected areas 101:This article is within the scope of 1385:distribute for a particular purpose 1327:allocates vs. provides vs. supplies 1274:University of Rochester Style Guide 38:It is of interest to the following 1990:Low-importance California articles 875:nobody is obligated to do anything 14: 1793:- with all due respect it is not 188:San Francisco Bay Area task force 2015:C-Class Protected areas articles 229: 208: 172: 88: 78: 51: 20: 2010:WikiProject California articles 286:This article has been rated as 147:This article has been rated as 130:Template:WikiProject California 1819:01:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 1785:20:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1767:19:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1732:23:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 1722:16:39, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 1712:12:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 1697:00:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 1653:05:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 1643:22:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 1624:22:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 1600:22:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 1587:02:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 1571:22:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 1542:22:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 1511:02:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 1486:01:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 570:distraction if it is to remain 1: 1970:01:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 1946:05:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1930:07:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1915:01:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1900:01:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1871:01:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1853:22:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC) 1682:21:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 1667:21:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 1459:21:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 1430:21:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 1416:21:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 1405:21:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 1373:21:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 1344:01:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 1322:04:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 1311:00:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 1280:22:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 1236:04:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 1226:03:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 1216:22:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 1182:19:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 1161:22:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 1128:19:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 1114:19:13, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 1096:19:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 1072:19:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 185:This article is supported by 180:San Francisco Bay Area portal 121:and see a list of open tasks. 1834:04:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 1268:American Heritage Dictionary 1985:C-Class California articles 1107:this article is a huge mess 1060:23:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1050:00:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 1024:20:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1004:00:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 993:22:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 983:21:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 965:22:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 240:WikiProject Protected areas 2041: 953:21:22, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 922:23:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 887:17:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 853:17:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 812:23:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 785:16:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 768:16:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 750:23:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 712:23:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 698:16:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 679:23:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 665:15:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 638:12:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 628:00:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 292:project's importance scale 153:project's importance scale 1502:I see you're stooping to 613:18:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 584:02:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 561:01:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 543:01:14, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 529:00:58, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 449:18:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 406:20:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC) 388:20:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC) 371:04:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 349:16:49, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 337:21:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 327:02:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 285: 224: 168: 146: 73: 46: 1037:Nevermind. According to 272:Protected areas articles 236:This article is part of 1337:gives out "mutt mitts", 1055:wow, that sounds great! 1391:make available for use 165: 104:WikiProject California 64:San Francisco Bay Area 28:This article is rated 1812:Laci and Conner's Law 1808:Livermore, California 1151:owntown Richmond vs. 481:) 00:51, 27 July 2007 164: 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 1791:is it? should it be? 1727:Sadly ROFL! but true 1285:The Free Dictionary 1080:Wow. This is scary. 133:California articles 1804:Fresno, California 1477:manners are very " 1290:YourDictionary.com 511:Copy edit template 166: 34:content assessment 1972: 1956:comment added by 1902: 1886:comment added by 1782:ILike2BeAnonymous 1757:Black Glove or a 1734: 1679:ILike2BeAnonymous 1574: 1508:ILike2BeAnonymous 1456:ILike2BeAnonymous 1413:ILike2BeAnonymous 1376: 1359:comment added by 1341:ILike2BeAnonymous 1313: 1297:comment added by 1238: 1223:ILike2BeAnonymous 1210: 1111:ILike2BeAnonymous 924: 884:ILike2BeAnonymous 814: 782:ILike2BeAnonymous 752: 714: 695:ILike2BeAnonymous 681: 575: 558:ILike2BeAnonymous 554:I'm not a janitor 526:ILike2BeAnonymous 483: 469:comment added by 446:ILike2BeAnonymous 318: 306: 305: 302: 301: 298: 297: 203: 202: 199: 198: 96:California portal 2032: 1951: 1881: 1726: 1555: 1375: 1353: 1292: 1230: 1208: 1103:Firesign Theater 1010:copedit template 915: 801: 744: 706: 672: 571: 503: 499: 482: 463: 431: 425: 314: 309:Largest dog park 274: 273: 270: 267: 264: 233: 226: 225: 220: 212: 205: 182: 177: 176: 175: 135: 134: 131: 128: 125: 98: 93: 92: 91: 82: 75: 74: 69: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2031: 2030: 2029: 1975: 1974: 1826: 1743:Berkeley Marina 1704: 1695: 1660: 1641: 1622: 1585: 1564:Don't Be A Dick 1354: 1329: 1196: 1082: 1014:does it really 1012: 975: 951: 611: 582: 541: 513: 508: 507: 506: 500: 496: 464: 441: 436: 435: 434: 426: 422: 394:Prairie Moraine 392:Here's link to 325: 311: 271: 268: 265: 263:Protected areas 262: 261: 218: 216:Protected areas 178: 173: 171: 132: 129: 126: 123: 122: 94: 89: 87: 67: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 2038: 2036: 2028: 2027: 2022: 2017: 2012: 2007: 2002: 1997: 1992: 1987: 1977: 1976: 1933: 1932: 1874: 1873: 1855: 1825: 1822: 1800:Ferry Building 1788: 1787: 1759:Charles Manson 1745:to the south.( 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1703: 1700: 1691: 1685: 1684: 1659: 1656: 1637: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1618: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1581: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1419: 1418: 1394: 1393: 1387: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1347: 1346: 1328: 1325: 1315: 1314: 1287: 1282: 1271: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1255: 1252: 1247:Dictionary.com 1240: 1239: 1228: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1117: 1116: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1053: 1052: 1042: 1011: 1008: 1007: 1006: 974: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 947: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 773: 772: 771: 770: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 737: 736: 735: 734: 727: 726: 725: 724: 718: 717: 716: 715: 701: 700: 685: 684: 683: 682: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 618: 617: 616: 615: 607: 598: 597: 596: 595: 589: 588: 587: 586: 576: 564: 563: 550: 537: 521: 520: 512: 509: 505: 504: 493: 492: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 457: 440: 437: 433: 432: 419: 418: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 319: 310: 307: 304: 303: 300: 299: 296: 295: 288:Low-importance 284: 278: 277: 275: 251:national parks 234: 222: 221: 219:Low‑importance 213: 201: 200: 197: 196: 193:Mid-importance 184: 183: 167: 157: 156: 149:Low-importance 145: 139: 138: 136: 119:the discussion 100: 99: 83: 71: 70: 68:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2037: 2026: 2023: 2021: 2018: 2016: 2013: 2011: 2008: 2006: 2003: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1993: 1991: 1988: 1986: 1983: 1982: 1980: 1973: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1948: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1903: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1879: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1859: 1856: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1841: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1823: 1821: 1820: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1796: 1792: 1786: 1783: 1779: 1777: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1765: 1760: 1756: 1751: 1750: 1748: 1744: 1733: 1730: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1710: 1702:Laci Peterson 1701: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1683: 1680: 1676: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1665: 1657: 1655: 1654: 1651: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1602: 1601: 1598: 1597:HeebieJeebies 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1575: 1573: 1572: 1569: 1568:HeebieJeebies 1565: 1561: 1543: 1540: 1535: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1512: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1460: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1431: 1428: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1417: 1414: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1399: 1392: 1388: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1345: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1326: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1283: 1281: 1278: 1275: 1272: 1269: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1256: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1237: 1234: 1233:71.142.84.165 1229: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1214: 1206: 1202: 1193: 1183: 1180: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1162: 1159: 1154: 1150: 1144: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1129: 1126: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1115: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1094: 1089: 1086: 1079: 1073: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1058: 1051: 1048: 1043: 1040: 1036: 1034: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1022: 1017: 1009: 1005: 1002: 997: 996: 995: 994: 991: 985: 984: 981: 972: 966: 963: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 950: 946: 923: 920: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 888: 885: 880: 876: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 854: 851: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 813: 810: 805: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 786: 783: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 769: 766: 762: 761: 760: 759: 751: 748: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 731: 730: 729: 728: 722: 721: 720: 719: 713: 710: 705: 704: 703: 702: 699: 696: 692: 687: 686: 680: 677: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 663: 658: 655: 649: 639: 636: 631: 630: 629: 626: 622: 621: 620: 619: 614: 610: 606: 602: 601: 600: 599: 593: 592: 591: 590: 585: 581: 580: 579:Sexy Contribs 574: 573:¡Talk2Cholga! 568: 567: 566: 565: 562: 559: 555: 551: 547: 546: 545: 544: 540: 536: 531: 530: 527: 518: 517: 516: 510: 502: 498: 495: 491: 480: 476: 472: 468: 462: 458: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 447: 438: 429: 424: 421: 417: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 390: 389: 385: 381: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 368: 364: 363:12.72.245.203 361: 350: 347: 344:That works!-- 343: 342: 340: 339: 338: 335: 331: 330: 329: 328: 324: 323: 322:Sexy Contribs 317: 316:¡Talk2Cholga! 308: 293: 289: 283: 280: 279: 276: 259: 258: 253: 252: 247: 243: 242: 241: 235: 232: 228: 227: 223: 217: 214: 211: 207: 194: 191:(assessed as 190: 189: 181: 170: 163: 159: 158: 154: 150: 144: 141: 140: 137: 120: 116: 115: 110: 106: 105: 97: 86: 84: 81: 77: 76: 72: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1949: 1934: 1904: 1877: 1875: 1857: 1839: 1830: 1827: 1815: 1794: 1790: 1789: 1776:encyclopedic 1775: 1773: 1763: 1752: 1740: 1739: 1728: 1708: 1705: 1686: 1663: 1661: 1658:measurements 1649: 1646: 1632: 1594: 1576: 1559: 1556: 1554: 1538: 1533: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1451: 1447: 1426: 1401: 1397: 1395: 1390: 1384: 1336: 1330: 1318: 1316: 1276: 1262: 1241: 1212: 1204: 1200: 1197: 1157: 1152: 1148: 1142: 1106: 1090: 1087: 1083: 1056: 1054: 1030: 1020: 1015: 1013: 989: 986: 976: 973:Copy-editing 961: 941: 918: 878: 874: 808: 803: 746: 708: 690: 675: 659: 653: 650: 646: 634: 625:Chuchopacman 578: 553: 532: 522: 514: 497: 489: 442: 439:"Leash-free" 423: 415: 398:24.196.67.58 380:24.196.67.58 357: 321: 312: 287: 255: 249: 238: 237: 186: 148: 112: 102: 40:WikiProjects 1958:Boomgaylove 1952:—Preceding 1888:Boomgaylove 1882:—Preceding 1802:or live in 1355:—Preceding 1293:—Preceding 1203:I admit is 465:—Preceding 248:related to 246:WikiProject 1979:Categories 1863:Marco polo 1845:Milkbreath 1504:ad hominem 1481:indecent". 1444:WP:Peacock 1383:Allocate: 1317:I give up. 490:References 416:References 260:worldwide. 254:and other 124:California 114:California 109:U.S. state 59:California 1878:this park 1389:Provide: 1194:Fundraise 1966:contribs 1954:unsigned 1922:Wikidemo 1907:Wikidemo 1896:contribs 1884:unsigned 1566:anymore. 1369:contribs 1357:unsigned 1307:contribs 1295:unsigned 1207:a word, 549:animals. 479:contribs 467:unsigned 1938:Tamfang 1858:Comment 1840:Comment 1693:my talk 1639:my talk 1620:my talk 1583:my talk 949:my talk 609:my talk 539:my talk 290:on the 151:on the 30:C-class 1831:Cholga 1816:Cholga 1774:in an 1764:Cholga 1729:Cholga 1719:Fizbin 1709:Cholga 1689:Chris! 1664:Cholga 1650:Cholga 1648:cheers 1635:Chris! 1616:Chris! 1579:Chris! 1539:Cholga 1483:Cholga 1479:shitty 1427:Cholga 1402:Cholga 1361:Cholga 1319:Cholga 1299:Cholga 1277:Cholga 1213:Cholga 1158:Cholga 1057:Cholga 1021:Cholga 990:Cholga 962:Cholga 945:Chris! 919:Cholga 850:Fizbin 809:Cholga 765:Fizbin 747:Cholga 723:IL2BA, 709:Cholga 691:aspire 676:Cholga 662:Fizbin 635:Cholga 605:Chris! 535:Chris! 471:Cholga 346:Fizbin 334:Fizbin 36:scale. 1778:sense 1675:metre 1143:seems 831:IL2BA 1962:talk 1942:talk 1926:talk 1911:talk 1892:talk 1867:talk 1849:talk 1795:your 1755:OJ's 1707:dog. 1475:your 1365:talk 1303:talk 1201:that 1179:Song 1125:Song 1093:Song 1069:Song 1047:Song 1033:Loce 1016:have 1001:Song 980:Song 879:some 804:want 654:both 475:talk 461:here 402:talk 384:talk 367:talk 244:, a 1880:. 1806:or 1231:lol 1209:yet 1205:not 282:Low 143:Low 111:of 1981:: 1968:) 1964:• 1944:) 1928:) 1913:) 1898:) 1894:• 1869:) 1851:) 1843:-- 1560:is 1534:my 1452:IF 1448:IF 1398:if 1371:) 1367:• 1309:) 1305:• 477:• 404:) 386:) 369:) 195:). 62:: 1960:( 1940:( 1936:— 1924:( 1909:( 1890:( 1865:( 1847:( 1814:. 1363:( 1301:( 1211:. 1153:D 1149:d 882:+ 524:+ 473:( 444:+ 400:( 382:( 365:( 294:. 155:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index