Talk:Patricia Billings

1213:, "Independent labs have tested GeoBond, a harmless mixture of cement, gypsum and a secret compound of off-the-shelf ingredients, and found it to have remarkable properties...No new fireproof material has shown so much promise since the downfall of asbestos..." Whether or not this product became a long-term commercial success, whether or not USG and others were able to duplicate its properties and market their own rival formulations, Patricia Billings invented something that got a lot of RS coverage and she is notable. The 2001 article that is sourced only to somebody selling a rival product should not be presented as the last word on the value of her invention. Not many people drive a Model T these days, but we still have an article about 1130:

material....and yet there are none. Using a gee-whiz glurge listicle as a starting point isn't always bad, if the wikiteur uses it as a starting point rather than a destination, but every single cite claiming this is significant -is- either preliminary and severely outdated, obviously sourced to the inventor, or citeless, and possibly based on sources that are preliminary, citeless, or sourced to the investor. There are no decent cites provided, and many of the claims made are laughable for people with a relevant technical background: it is not remarkable that gypsum wouldn’t support a flame, for instance.

1737:, and others. I thank you for your research into the citations and article improvements. I don't have much to say at this point, as I feel intimidated and POV-railroaded by the editor who originally brought this article to AfD. In the nearly nine years I have been editing I have never been belittled so many times in edit summaries, and was even hauled off to ANI for the first time ever, for aleged lack of "competence" and "canvassing" in relation to this article (the claim was inactionable.) Quite frankly I am fearful of retaliation from them if I continue to work on the article. 279: 229: 211: 1457:: Editors show consensus that the source is reliable in most cases on subject matters in its areas of expertise." The statements that the company is failing would be within his area of expertise; statements about what a crap product they were selling are sourced solely to one rival representative. There are many reasons for small startups run by inexperienced people to fail besides that they were trying to sell people garbage. 1337:, Your argument has no merit. This is not an article about the product Geobond. It is a biography of a living person. Whether or not you "like" the product less than Duracal is irrelevant. The truth is that there was an article about her on the front page of the Wall Street Journal. That you personally believe it was placed there for "comic relief" is your personal opinion. It is certainly not a reason to delete the citation. 401: 377: 610:

derogatory, and deleting so many citations that can be useful for context. This is especially important at this time when the article is currently a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's educational initiatives. Nonsense edit summaries are abstruse and battlegroundish antics can be intimidating; neither set positive examples for newer or first time editors. Please be more thoughtful in the future. Thank you.

141: 123: 510: 457: 92: 1907:

catalog that survived the laboratories' four-hour torture test without smoking, catching fire or becoming too weak to support typical roofs and ceilings. Only a handful of the fire-resistant building materials tested each year provides enough protection to contain intense fires for as long as four hours, said Dan Kaiser, a Underwriters Laboratories' fire protection engineer.

1369:: "Most content on Forbes.com is written by contributors with minimal editorial oversight, and is generally unreliable. Editors show consensus for treating Forbes.com contributor articles as self-published sources, unless the article was written by a subject-matter expert. Forbes.com contributor articles should never be used for third-party claims about living persons." 21: 307: 151: 1805:

Last year, the well-regarded Underwriters Laboratory tested a 10-by-10-foot wall that had a two-inch thick panel of GeoBond on each side. The Chicago-based independent lab subjected it to flames as hot as 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit for four hours, and found that the temperature on the other side stayed

687:

The problem: Geobond isn't the whizbang stuff the media wanted it to be. Cement and gypsum can be mixed together, no secret "catalyst" necessary. "It's just a matter of knowing the chemistry of the cement and mixing it right," says Paul Shipp, a senior associate in USG's research department. USG even

790:

It is news to me that the following are a "bunch of crap sources": Wall Street Journal, Kansas City Star, National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, People Magazine, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, CBS News, Popular Mechanics, and several books. And yet a snarky short article in Forbes trumps

1588:

There are also multiple sources that praise Billings and Geobond in the context of recognizing women's achievements. These are suitable for showing evidence that her work was recognized as important, but for facts in the article, we should be using the RS cited above, which are based on independent

1271:

The part of the WSJ article I quoted does not include the word "supposedly" and was undoubtedly fact-checked. Certainly there has been "hype" about Geobond, but there were also factual statements about its properties and, as you say, its "promise." But this is not an article about Geobond, or about

820:

Enough with the "see talk page" business, Qwirkle, when you've already been addressed by us here. It is immaterial to me, and indeed to the existence of the biography, whether Geobond changed the world or was a load of doo-doo. The details of her biography, career, and patents are not disputed. You

1289:

In front of two dozen firemen and onlookers at the Kansas City Fire Department's Test Station, two miniature homes have been set ablaze. One is made of standard construction: drywall, vinyl siding and shaker shingles. The other has the same wood frame, but its walls and roof shingles are made with

1079:

article, the source of the negative comments about Geobond is the manufacturer of a rival product ("Paul Shipp, a senior associate in USG's research department. USG even makes such a mixture, called Duracal, used to repair roads.") Shipp is also the source of the claim that "brick, cement, ceramic

1129:

MIT, and others, certainly should have a wealth of sources about this product, if it isn’t a flash-in-the-pan. There should be cites about actual material science, there should be cites about the business aspect, there should be cites about manufacturing issues, and significant projects using the

1906:

The wall tested by Underwriters Laboratories was made by putting GeoBond over metal lath and tarpaper. Billings and Michalski call it the FireTherm system...While all GeoBond products are highly fire-resistant, the FireTherm wall system is the only product listed in the Underwriters Laboratories

1053:

In 2001, a financial columnist at Forbes wrote an unflattering article about the company manufacturing the product Billings invented. The columnist also made unflattering comments about the product Geobond that are directly contradicted by other RS more likely to have expert knowledge concerning

846:

And a 2018 book from the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine; a 2002 book published by Wiley; a St. Louis Post-Dispatch article from 2007, a 2017 book on Women designers, craftswomen, architects and engineers; a 2020 Popular Mechanics piece, and other additional news and book

609:

While you may feel a sense of disappointment or even frustration that your AfD on this woman inventor was closed as unanimously Keep (and many Speedy Keep !votes), it is kindly requested that you please refrain from adding nonsense-words and incomprehensible edit summaries that are bordering on

675:

Here was the "best alternative to asbestos in decades," said the Journal. People magazine, CBS' 48 Hours and NBC's Dateline picked up the story. Crews of firefighters ignited a bonfire inside a Geobond shack, which refused to burn. Billings turned down a $ 20 million buyout offer. Perhaps $ 80

560:

More importantly, though, there are a good many products, completely unrelated, that share this name. When I did a google search of “geobond”, the first three pages had only one hit for Ms. Billings’ product aside from listicle glurge. All the others were for an unrelated roofing system from

1241:

Duracal was developed well before this, and was in actual use in the early ‘70s, as three minutes with a search engine will tell anyone interested in fact instead of fantasy. Unless you are adding time travel to Ms. Billings’ remarkable claims, the idea that it was developed in response is

1232:

No...on so many levels. To begin with, the WSJ cite appears to be from the bottom section of the front page, which is to say it is from the usual comic relief/hum interest article. Such articles often contain hyperbolic claims, and are sometimes meant to be taken with a grain of

681:

Someday has come, and Billings has plenty of time to sculpt. But she isn't any multimillionaire. Once the hype died down, buyout offers ceased and so did sales of Geobond. Billings' staff has shrunk from 13 to 3. She'd have a hard time filling orders these days, if there were

580:

hello does anyone know where one can get Geobond cement that Patricia Billings invented way back then,,the Geobond company that mrs Billings had is no longer around, This Geobond cement is allegedly fireproof to 6000 degrees, I ve tried googling but couldnt find any info...

1615:

I see no policy-based reason this article should conceal from our readers what RS say about tests that were done on GeoBond. Is it because Billings, like any business owner, sought to publicize the favorable result of tests by respected groups such as UL.org? Both WSJ and

805:

Of course. Whether these were once good sources isn’t the question. Twenty-some year old sources talking about possibilities, sourced obviously to press releases and the subject, mean very little at this point. The Forbes source and a possible later bankruptcy mean more.

1863:

In a test earlier this year at Underwriters Laboratories Inc, a wall made from the GeoBond product withstood four hours of blowtorch-hot flame, reaching a peak of 2,000 degrees...Temperatures on the other side never exceeded 187 degrees, the temperature of warm

469: 1755:, and those accusations were absurd. I had to step back from this toxic environment for a while because I can't let one user's negativity burn me out. Thanks for staying in the battle longer than I did. I am concern that it isn't over. We'll see. 1175:, She has been written about in numerous reliable news sources including the Wall Street Journal, CBS News, Popular Mechanics, St. Louis Dispatch, National Academy of Sciences, Kansas City Star as well as in several books, and has an entry in the 1049:

This article is about an inventor, one of whose inventions was Geobond. There have been many non-RS publications about the inventor and the product, and it makes sense for the article to prune out poor sources while relying on good ones.

1105:

Thank you for pointing that out, I agree with what you have written above. However the editor who insists that the former Forbes writer is the sole purveyor of the truth has been deleting citations and content that they don't agree with.

1418:

material in the bio, asking only that it be presented in a less POV way, and in context. But speaking of impeaching good cites, your quibbles about the WSJ article's reliability are ... but my speculation must be constrained by WP:AGF.

1080:

and plaster are cheaper or more widely available and just as fireproof." So if we want to include negative remarks about Geobond, by all means give the actual source of those comments--don't present them as facts in Knowledge's voice.

1833:

Last summer members of the Kansas City, Mo., Fire Department performed a test on two sheds, one of conventional materials and one of GeoBond. When fire investigator Gary Dull set them both ablaze, only the GeoBond structure remained

862:

Which illustrates why we should avoid sourcing to listicles, even in book form. Ordinarily, these’d probably be pretty good cites....and yet they vector the obvious doo-doo, to use your word, that this was a significant invention.

1248:

Rapid repair of transportation facilities, especially roads, airports, and tunnels, is a real priority for many companies and government agencies. Why aren’t there hundreds of cites for it, instead of...one, by look of it?

556:

Umm...no. To begin with, Google is not some oracle that reveals Big Tee Truth, it is a marketing system that attempts to find the cites that the seeker wants. If someone has just done one search, that factors into the next

688:

makes such a mixture, called Duracal, used to repair roads. "We could plaster a wall with it," Shipp says, but why bother when brick, cement, ceramic and plaster are cheaper or more widely available and just as fireproof.

1948:

The article has been substantially improved since the templates were added. I am removing them. Anybody who wants to re-instate them should explain on the talk page what elements in this bio are non-neutral or false.

552:

Just google "Geobond" and you will see how widespread this product is globally. The market for it is alive and well, it is used for many applications in many countries, and now has offices in several countries.

645:

The reader may also wish to ask why there isn’t any meaningful coverage of this product after 2000 in newspapers.com, and whether a vibrant, ongoing firm would have abandoned all their trademarks by 2002...

1308:

Leaving aside the belabored point that only on Knowledge is any sign of expertise used as an insult, I’d say that preventing glurgers from lying to our readers is a most valuable use of anyone’s expertise.

514: 1641:

There are a whole battery of formal test protocols from several reputable testing organizations. Building and torching a couple of sheds doesn’t seem to mentioned by either ASTM or UL, last I checked.

1179:. The AfD was closed unanimously as keep, I am sorry if that was disappointing to you. The article was vetted during the process by experienced editors. The citations in reliable sources exist. 1272:

the company that manufactured it. It is a BLP for a person who is notable because multiple RS considered her notable even if you do not. Find something more valuable to do with your expertise.

1929:, Stop repeatedly removing content and verifiable citations in reliable sources that I have added, such as the 2017 book on Women designers, craftswomen, architects and engineers, and others. 1624:; the Star goes on to quote a UL engineer on that testing. And why should we doubt the results reported in RS as having been done by a lab at Edwards Air Force Base or the KC Fire Department? 1655:

The protocols used are described in the RS, including the protocol used for UL testing. Knowledge editing is based on reaching consensus, not on repeated reverts to your own favored version.

979:“Does not support combustion” is not the same as “fireproof”. It is not remarkable, at all, that a piece of rock does not burn, rather the exceptions coal, brimstone and some shales are. 297: 2007: 353: 2017: 764:

Of course the accuracy is disputed; we have a bunch of crap sources suggesting the firm is a world-beater, and a good one stating it is moribund for almost twenty years now.

71: 1057:

For example, the 2001 magazine story should be placed in the article in chronological order, before the RS stating that in 2006 the product was still widely used and sold.

1025:

Qwirkle, please stop your disruptive deletions. The magical bot-elves never arrived to restore the citations you deleted. You are wasting several other editors time here.

821:

are simply saying it is incomplete because the Forbes articlette isn't present. So add it. Add the Forbes source and stop the reversions that add that inappropriate tag.

359: 31: 2012: 2002: 1987: 1499:

article is basically an opinion piece based on one suspect source, and that your description in the bio of what it says is even more POV than the article itself.

407: 387: 877:

Qwirkle, it's silly to violate Knowledge policy by reverting the article, what is it now, 5 times today? The more you pick at it, the more we'll patch it up.

1992: 1972: 1450: 76: 2022: 329: 59:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 1627:

The claim that other materials could pass such tests is irrelevant to this article, which is based on what reliable sources say about Patricia Billings.

1158:

Nonsense. If the product has no merit, the inventor is not significant, except as an example of, to give one of the respectable possibilities, folklore.

1054:

building products, such as MIT. I agree that the 2001 story should be in this article, but it needs to be given due WP:WEIGHT and presented in context.

526: 485: 1060:

It also violates NPOV to use expressions such as "points out," which implies that this 2001 article presents the REAL truth overlooked by other RS.

1982: 1977: 169: 51: 320: 284: 1235:

Next, the WSJ article begins with a rather ptominent “supposedly” which somehow seem to have managed to get lost before reaching the article.

173: 1997: 1806:

steady at 187 degrees, not even hot enough to boil water. The government lab at Edwards Air Force Base near Los Angeles also tested it.

693:

Whither Geobond? There may be uses for it, albeit obscure say, a coating that could be used for telephone poles in wildfire districts.

412: 382: 177: 1010:

More to the point, any actual use of the cites elsewhere in the article is restored by bot; there is no “destruction” involved here.

628:

in selecting suitable cites, and you will do less to cause the Wikimedia Foundation’s educational initiatives painful embarrassment.

1245:

Duracal was in pretty common use for rapid repair for at least 30 years, and decent technical cites for it aren’t difficult to find.

1585:

Billings's notability rests on in-depth coverage by fact-checked reliable sources, which should be the backbone of this article.

168:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 245: 1388:

will show, this is from the print edition. As a review of the print edition will show, the writer was a senior member of staff.

164: 128: 1876: 513:

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available

1471:

Ahh, you now accept that this was a small startup that failed rather than a world-shaker found on every inhabited continent.

630:

More importantly, the reader will note that none of the factual observations made above are addressed, let alone answered.

717:. Note that it was published in 2001, before Fitch left Forbes..i.e., it appears to be “reliably sourced”, in WikiSpeak 103: 328:

and related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1495:

was at 15:01 today. I have never proposed that the company or the product was world-shaking. I still contend that the

417: 236: 216: 1562:, but it's a marginal case). Please don't edit war on this issue and instead resolve it here on the talk page, or on 1760: 914: 882: 826: 755: 27: 1890: 1847: 296: 278: 1721:

I'm responding to a ping. Thank you to the editors who have volunteered to work on this article, in particular

1621: 1445:

is ALSO promoting the company USG, as does his criticism of Ms Billings's rival product. Articles in published

1365:

That 2001 Forbes article, identified as being submitted by a "former contributor" is not RS for a BLP. Quoting

477: 91: 1954: 1712: 1632: 1594: 1504: 1462: 1424: 1374: 1277: 1222: 1085: 1065: 60: 1756: 1722: 1691:

It is also very bad form to refactor without explanation comments made by others on Talk pages as you did

910: 878: 822: 751: 228: 210: 750:, who is suggesting it is incomplete but not doing the work to complete it... So add the source already. 109: 714: 1934: 1742: 1342: 1184: 1149: 1111: 1030: 999: 949: 852: 796: 615: 70:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 20: 1730: 1696: 1366: 1359: 676:

million was enough, she said. Maybe someday, she mused, "this old lady can go off and just do art."

244:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1950: 1870: 1726: 1708: 1628: 1590: 1571: 1545: 1500: 1458: 1420: 1370: 1273: 1218: 1100: 1081: 1061: 534: 493: 460:

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between

74:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 1442: 1144:

This is a BLP about a person, it is not an article about Geobond. Your argument has no merit.

1646: 1518: 1478: 1395: 1314: 1254: 1163: 1135: 1015: 984: 964: 928: 900: 868: 811: 769: 737: 722: 701: 651: 635: 588: 566: 1612:

with edit summary saying that tests cited by RS were 1) publicity stunts and 2) unremarkable.

959:

Quit making false claims about what references say. That is neither honest nor constructive.

944:

Stop removing references, such as the Wall Street Journal article. That is not constructive.

1559: 325: 156: 1930: 1752: 1738: 1704: 1338: 1290:

Ms. Billings's invention: a cement- like, supposedly fireproof material she calls GeoBond.

1180: 1145: 1107: 1026: 995: 945: 848: 792: 611: 67: 1589:

testimony from groups such as UL, Edwards Air Force Base, and the KS Mo Fire Department.

1818: 1563: 473: 312: 1966: 1734: 1567: 1549: 625: 576: 530: 518: 489: 1792: 1581:

Reliable sources: propose separating out tertiary sources into "Recognition" section

1390:

Why you are so bent on impeaching good cites is left as an exercise for the reader.

1924: 1642: 1605: 1541: 1514: 1488: 1474: 1409: 1391: 1334: 1310: 1266: 1250: 1204: 1172: 1159: 1131: 1011: 980: 960: 924: 896: 864: 807: 765: 747: 733: 718: 697: 647: 631: 604: 584: 562: 1217:, and it does not conclude with a paragraph about how much better a Cadillac is. 509: 456: 400: 376: 140: 122: 1214: 302: 146: 1513:

I did, actually. I mistook you for one of the above. For that, I apologize.

1238:

Claims of “promise” have a shelf life, and 25-odd years seems well past that.

1958: 1938: 1764: 1746: 1716: 1650: 1636: 1598: 1575: 1522: 1508: 1482: 1466: 1428: 1399: 1378: 1346: 1318: 1281: 1258: 1226: 1188: 1167: 1153: 1139: 1115: 1089: 1069: 1034: 1019: 1003: 988: 968: 953: 932: 918: 904: 886: 872: 856: 830: 815: 800: 773: 759: 741: 726: 705: 655: 639: 619: 592: 570: 538: 497: 847:

sources beats the Forbes 2001 short (and rather snarky) article any day.

1554: 1008:

Stop misrepresenting the cites, and there’s no reason to remove them.

1045:

Forbes article from 2001 should not be presented as the "last word"

732:(Indeed, note that it was published in print, February 5th, 2001.) 416:

project in October 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please

176:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 241: 1793:"New Fireproof Building Material May Be Alternative to Asbestos" 994:

You removed three more citations. Stop the destructive editing.

85: 66:

from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially

43: 15: 909:

To what "agenda" do you refer in your recent edit summary?

583:. Does that strike you as proof that it’s widely avaiable? 1700: 1692: 1681: 1678: 1675: 1672: 1669: 1666: 1656: 1609: 1492: 1177:

Historical Encyclopedia of American Women Entrepreneurs

746:

The accuracy of the BLP is not disputed by anyone but

504:

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

451:

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

420:

regarding their contributions before making changes.

324:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 240:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 358:This article has not yet received a rating on the 406:This article was created or improved during the 1443:Stephane Fitch's other article in February 2001 1294:Why is it so important to you to suppress this? 561:Sherwin-Williams, and an animal feed additive. 1286:Yet the article does say “supposedly”, to wit: 8: 2018:WikiProject Women in Red meetup 179 articles 2008:Unknown-importance Women's History articles 1491:Do you have me confused with someone else? 89: 371: 273: 205: 117: 527:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 486:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 1783: 1620:reference professional testing done by 525:Above undated message substituted from 484:Above undated message substituted from 373: 275: 207: 119: 1988:Start-Class WikiProject Women articles 1868: 1288: 692: 686: 680: 674: 579: 551: 545: 1891:"KC product can take the heat part 2" 1848:"KC product can take the heat part 1" 1566:where you are already discussing it. 338:Knowledge:WikiProject Women's History 7: 2013:WikiProject Women's History articles 2003:Start-Class Women's History articles 341:Template:WikiProject Women's History 318:This article is within the scope of 234:This article is within the scope of 162:This article is within the scope of 1993:All WikiProject Women-related pages 1973:Biography articles of living people 1918:STOP removing content and citations 1414:I was quite content to include the 108:It is of interest to the following 2023:All WikiProject Women in Red pages 465: 461: 426:Knowledge:WikiProject Women in Red 30:on 27 October 2020. The result of 14: 1791:Kumar, Amal (25 September 1996). 429:Template:WikiProject Women in Red 624:Please display a basic level of 508: 468:. Further details are available 455: 399: 375: 305: 295: 277: 227: 209: 149: 139: 121: 90: 49:This article must adhere to the 19: 1548:, you are both in violation of 1453:," that is "Generally reliable 186:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 26:This article was nominated for 1983:WikiProject Biography articles 1978:Start-Class biography articles 189:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 1959:04:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC) 1939:23:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 1765:17:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 1747:16:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 1717:14:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 1651:05:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 1637:03:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 1610:edit removing relevant quotes 1599:18:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 1576:03:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 1558:might be okay because of the 1523:02:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 1509:02:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 1493:My first edit to this article 1483:02:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 1467:01:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 1429:02:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 1400:01:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 1379:01:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 1347:23:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 1319:00:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 1282:23:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 1259:22:39, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 1227:22:10, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 1189:22:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 1168:22:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 1154:22:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 1140:21:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 1116:21:53, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 1090:21:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 1070:21:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 1035:21:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 670:Again, googling “Geobond”.... 332:and see a list of open tasks. 248:and see a list of open tasks. 52:biographies of living persons 1020:02:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC) 1004:02:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC) 989:01:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC) 969:12:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC) 954:10:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC) 933:00:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC) 919:00:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC) 905:00:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC) 887:00:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC) 873:23:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC) 857:19:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC) 831:19:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC) 816:19:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC) 801:18:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC) 774:17:57, 6 November 2020 (UTC) 760:17:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC) 742:02:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC) 727:23:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC) 706:23:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC) 656:04:21, 9 November 2020 (UTC) 640:21:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC) 620:21:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC) 593:21:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC) 571:20:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC) 539:02:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC) 498:02:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC) 174:contribute to the discussion 321:WikiProject Women's History 254:Knowledge:WikiProject Women 64:must be removed immediately 2039: 1998:WikiProject Women articles 1875:: CS1 maint: url-status ( 1846:Meyer, Gene (1996-05-03). 1386:at the cite in the article 360:project's importance scale 260:WikiProject Women articles 257:Template:WikiProject Women 1795:. The Wall Street Journal 1622:Underwriters Laboratories 1455:in its areas of expertise 1449:magazine are considered " 891:Ahh, tendentious editing 546:Just google "Geobond".... 408:Women in STEM edit-a-thon 394: 357: 290: 222: 134: 116: 923:” O, wad some Power...” 344:Women's History articles 1751:I really felt for you, 98:This article is rated 1075:Looking again at the 517:. Student editor(s): 472:. Student editor(s): 432:Women in Red articles 165:WikiProject Biography 1895:The Kansas City Star 1852:The Kansas City Star 388:Women in STEM (2020) 1897:. 1996-05-03. p. 24 1604:Commenting here on 1211:Wall Street Journal 895:tag teaming! Kewl. 478:Anonymous user22144 1451:generally reliable 515:on the course page 476:. Peer reviewers: 470:on the course page 192:biography articles 104:content assessment 1441:Interesting that 462:29 September 2020 448: 447: 444: 443: 440: 439: 418:assume good faith 370: 369: 366: 365: 272: 271: 268: 267: 237:WikiProject Women 204: 203: 200: 199: 84: 83: 42: 41: 2030: 1928: 1910: 1909: 1903: 1902: 1887: 1881: 1880: 1874: 1866: 1860: 1859: 1843: 1837: 1836: 1830: 1829: 1815: 1809: 1808: 1802: 1800: 1788: 1618:Kansas City Star 1557: 1413: 1270: 1208: 1104: 608: 541: 512: 500: 467: 466:18 December 2020 463: 459: 434: 433: 430: 427: 424: 403: 396: 395: 390: 379: 372: 346: 345: 342: 339: 336: 315: 310: 309: 308: 299: 292: 291: 281: 274: 262: 261: 258: 255: 252: 231: 224: 223: 213: 206: 194: 193: 190: 187: 184: 170:join the project 159: 157:Biography portal 154: 153: 152: 143: 136: 135: 125: 118: 101: 95: 94: 86: 72:this noticeboard 44: 23: 16: 2038: 2037: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2029: 2028: 2027: 1963: 1962: 1946: 1922: 1920: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1900: 1898: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1867: 1857: 1855: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1827: 1825: 1819:"Her Big Break" 1817: 1816: 1812: 1798: 1796: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1757:DiamondRemley39 1723:DiamondRemley39 1583: 1553: 1539: 1407: 1363: 1264: 1202: 1098: 1047: 977: 911:DiamondRemley39 879:DiamondRemley39 823:DiamondRemley39 752:DiamondRemley39 672: 602: 549: 524: 506: 483: 453: 431: 428: 425: 422: 421: 385: 343: 340: 337: 335:Women's History 334: 333: 326:Women's history 311: 306: 304: 285:Women's History 259: 256: 253: 250: 249: 191: 188: 185: 182: 181: 155: 150: 148: 102:on Knowledge's 99: 12: 11: 5: 2036: 2034: 2026: 2025: 2020: 2015: 2010: 2005: 2000: 1995: 1990: 1985: 1980: 1975: 1965: 1964: 1945: 1942: 1919: 1916: 1912: 1911: 1882: 1838: 1810: 1782: 1781: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1731:Morbidthoughts 1697:Morbidthoughts 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1625: 1613: 1582: 1579: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1362: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1328: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1123: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1093: 1092: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 976: 973: 972: 971: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 875: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 710: 671: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 575:PS:From 2013, 548: 543: 505: 502: 452: 449: 446: 445: 442: 441: 438: 437: 435: 410:hosted by the 404: 392: 391: 380: 368: 367: 364: 363: 356: 350: 349: 347: 330:the discussion 317: 316: 313:History portal 300: 288: 287: 282: 270: 269: 266: 265: 263: 246:the discussion 232: 220: 219: 214: 202: 201: 198: 197: 195: 161: 160: 144: 132: 131: 126: 114: 113: 107: 96: 82: 81: 77:this help page 61:poorly sourced 47: 40: 39: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2035: 2024: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2011: 2009: 2006: 2004: 2001: 1999: 1996: 1994: 1991: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1971: 1970: 1968: 1961: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1951:HouseOfChange 1943: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1926: 1917: 1908: 1896: 1892: 1886: 1883: 1878: 1872: 1865: 1853: 1849: 1842: 1839: 1835: 1824: 1820: 1814: 1811: 1807: 1794: 1787: 1784: 1780: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1727:HouseOfChange 1724: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1709:HouseOfChange 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1680: 1677: 1674: 1671: 1668: 1658: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1629:HouseOfChange 1626: 1623: 1619: 1614: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1591:HouseOfChange 1586: 1580: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1556: 1555:HouseOfChange 1551: 1547: 1546:HouseOfChange 1543: 1536: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1501:HouseOfChange 1498: 1494: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459:HouseOfChange 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1421:HouseOfChange 1417: 1411: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1371:HouseOfChange 1368: 1361: 1357: 1354: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1295: 1292: 1291: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1274:HouseOfChange 1268: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1246: 1243: 1239: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1219:HouseOfChange 1216: 1212: 1206: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1102: 1101:HouseOfChange 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1082:HouseOfChange 1078: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1062:HouseOfChange 1058: 1055: 1051: 1044: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 992: 991: 990: 986: 982: 974: 970: 966: 962: 958: 957: 956: 955: 951: 947: 934: 930: 926: 922: 921: 920: 916: 912: 908: 907: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 889: 888: 884: 880: 876: 874: 870: 866: 861: 860: 859: 858: 854: 850: 832: 828: 824: 819: 818: 817: 813: 809: 804: 803: 802: 798: 794: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 775: 771: 767: 763: 762: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 744: 743: 739: 735: 731: 730: 729: 728: 724: 720: 716: 711: 708: 707: 703: 699: 695: 694: 690: 689: 684: 683: 678: 677: 669: 657: 653: 649: 644: 643: 642: 641: 637: 633: 627: 623: 622: 621: 617: 613: 606: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 573: 572: 568: 564: 558: 554: 553: 547: 544: 542: 540: 536: 532: 528: 522: 520: 516: 511: 503: 501: 499: 495: 491: 487: 481: 479: 475: 471: 458: 450: 436: 419: 415: 414: 409: 405: 402: 398: 397: 393: 389: 384: 381: 378: 374: 361: 355: 352: 351: 348: 331: 327: 323: 322: 314: 303: 301: 298: 294: 293: 289: 286: 283: 280: 276: 264: 247: 243: 239: 238: 233: 230: 226: 225: 221: 218: 215: 212: 208: 196: 179: 178:documentation 175: 171: 167: 166: 158: 147: 145: 142: 138: 137: 133: 130: 127: 124: 120: 115: 111: 105: 97: 93: 88: 87: 79: 78: 73: 69: 65: 62: 58: 54: 53: 48: 46: 45: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1947: 1921: 1905: 1899:. Retrieved 1894: 1885: 1862: 1856:. Retrieved 1851: 1841: 1832: 1826:. Retrieved 1822: 1813: 1804: 1797:. Retrieved 1786: 1778: 1701:on this page 1665: 1617: 1587: 1584: 1540: 1496: 1472: 1454: 1446: 1415: 1389: 1385: 1367:WP:FORBESCON 1364: 1360:WP:FORBESCON 1358:article and 1355: 1327: 1293: 1287: 1247: 1244: 1240: 1237: 1234: 1210: 1209:Quoting the 1201: 1176: 1122: 1076: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1009: 978: 975:Inaccuracies 943: 892: 845: 712: 709: 696: 691: 685: 679: 673: 629: 574: 559: 555: 550: 523: 507: 482: 454: 423:Women in Red 413:Women in Red 411: 383:Women in Red 319: 235: 163: 110:WikiProjects 75: 63: 56: 50: 35: 1384:As looking 100:Start-class 1967:Categories 1931:Netherzone 1901:2020-11-07 1858:2020-11-06 1828:2018-03-30 1823:PEOPLE.com 1799:27 October 1779:References 1753:Netherzone 1739:Netherzone 1705:Netherzone 1560:BLP clause 1552:(although 1473:Progress. 1339:Netherzone 1242:laughable. 1215:Henry Ford 1181:Netherzone 1146:Netherzone 1108:Netherzone 1027:Netherzone 996:Netherzone 946:Netherzone 849:Netherzone 793:Netherzone 626:competence 612:Netherzone 1944:Templates 1871:cite news 474:Pompquine 183:Biography 129:Biography 68:libellous 1735:Gbear605 1568:Gbear605 1537:Edit War 791:these? 531:PrimeBOT 519:Mstou001 490:PrimeBOT 28:deletion 1925:Qwirkle 1854:. p. 19 1834:intact. 1643:Qwirkle 1606:Qwirkle 1564:WP:BLPN 1542:Qwirkle 1515:Qwirkle 1489:Qwirkle 1475:Qwirkle 1410:Qwirkle 1392:Qwirkle 1335:Qwirkle 1311:Qwirkle 1267:Qwirkle 1251:Qwirkle 1205:Qwirkle 1173:Qwirkle 1160:Qwirkle 1132:Qwirkle 1012:Qwirkle 981:Qwirkle 961:Qwirkle 925:Qwirkle 897:Qwirkle 865:Qwirkle 808:Qwirkle 766:Qwirkle 748:Qwirkle 734:Qwirkle 719:Qwirkle 698:Qwirkle 648:Qwirkle 632:Qwirkle 605:Qwirkle 585:Qwirkle 563:Qwirkle 1550:WP:3RR 1497:Forbes 1447:Forbes 1416:Forbes 1356:Forbes 1077:Forbes 106:scale. 1864:food. 1233:salt. 713:From 251:Women 242:women 217:Women 1955:talk 1935:talk 1877:link 1801:2020 1761:talk 1743:talk 1713:talk 1699:and 1693:here 1682:diff 1679:diff 1676:diff 1673:diff 1670:diff 1667:diff 1657:diff 1647:talk 1633:talk 1595:talk 1572:talk 1519:talk 1505:talk 1479:talk 1463:talk 1425:talk 1396:talk 1375:talk 1343:talk 1315:talk 1278:talk 1255:talk 1223:talk 1185:talk 1164:talk 1150:talk 1136:talk 1112:talk 1086:talk 1066:talk 1031:talk 1016:talk 1000:talk 985:talk 965:talk 950:talk 929:talk 915:talk 901:talk 883:talk 869:talk 853:talk 827:talk 812:talk 797:talk 770:talk 756:talk 738:talk 723:talk 715:here 702:talk 682:any. 652:talk 636:talk 616:talk 589:talk 581:thnx 577:here 567:talk 557:one. 535:talk 494:talk 464:and 172:and 36:keep 34:was 1703:to 1695:to 1608:'s 893:and 529:by 488:by 354:??? 57:BLP 1969:: 1957:) 1937:) 1904:. 1893:. 1873:}} 1869:{{ 1861:. 1850:. 1831:. 1821:. 1803:. 1763:) 1745:) 1733:, 1729:, 1725:, 1715:) 1707:. 1649:) 1635:) 1597:) 1574:) 1544:, 1521:) 1507:) 1481:) 1465:) 1427:) 1398:) 1377:) 1345:) 1317:) 1280:) 1257:) 1225:) 1187:) 1166:) 1152:) 1138:) 1114:) 1088:) 1068:) 1033:) 1018:) 1002:) 987:) 967:) 952:) 931:) 917:) 903:) 885:) 871:) 855:) 829:) 814:) 799:) 772:) 758:) 740:) 725:) 704:) 654:) 638:) 618:) 591:) 569:) 537:) 521:. 496:) 480:. 386:: 1953:( 1933:( 1927:: 1923:@ 1879:) 1759:( 1741:( 1711:( 1645:( 1631:( 1593:( 1570:( 1517:( 1503:( 1477:( 1461:( 1423:( 1412:: 1408:@ 1394:( 1373:( 1341:( 1313:( 1276:( 1269:: 1265:@ 1253:( 1221:( 1207:: 1203:@ 1183:( 1162:( 1148:( 1134:( 1110:( 1103:: 1099:@ 1084:( 1064:( 1029:( 1014:( 998:( 983:( 963:( 948:( 927:( 913:( 899:( 881:( 867:( 851:( 825:( 810:( 795:( 768:( 754:( 736:( 721:( 700:( 650:( 634:( 614:( 607:: 603:@ 587:( 565:( 533:( 492:( 362:. 180:. 112:: 80:. 55:( 38:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index