117:
99:
197:
72:
127:
327:
peacock language I was able to identify from my original draft was around the regional/industry impact of its annual conference, which I attempted to paraphrase from the
Honolulu Advertiser article (which later merged with the Star-Bulletin to create the daily newspaper here). Instead, I'm more directly using the "largest" verbiage (similar to what is used in the
21:
369:
I hope my edits to the article just now and my clarifications above help ameliorate some of your concerns. While I recognize the article is very much a stub, I do believe it is written and comes across objectively (having slept on it, noticed your concerns, re-read, and edited some again today) and
326:
Aloha Vick. Although I live in Hawaiʻi, I don't work directly nor indirectly for PTC, which I feel I should clarify given your tagged concerns around the article being an advert/not objective. I have attended their conference twice as I work in this industry. About the only piece of puffery or
287:
overwhelmingly recognized the organization is more than sufficiently notable in its field. I've tried to create a rough-but-sourced article, but it is admittedly a stub. Hopefully will have some time to expand it further eventually (or, hopefully even more so, someone beats me to it).
365:
from reliable sources (both trade and otherwise) — and the consensus in that conversation was that it was a clearly notable organization (not least because of its ~1,210 Google
Scholar references and ~445 newspaper archive search results dating back to 1980 in at least one tool I just
215:
41:
384:
This is well explained but we might need to agree to disagree. I didn't imply that you have a COI, in fact, there are far worse drafts. However, this article applies to the organisation. If we're creating another article for the conference, then
358:
284:
51:
405:. Let's consider notability- it's inadequate to assume notability based on quantity. If you could provide me with two in-depth secondary reliable independent refs, I'd be convinced. But NORG states
283:
When creating this article, I noticed it had previously been deleted as someone had apparently just copied and pasted a blurb at some point from the organization itself — although the
456:
173:
179:
410:
466:
255:
414:
261:
149:
451:
418:
331:
article) from that source and others, and I've tried to streamline all of the language throughout the article to stick solely to its facts (similarly to the
471:
231:
140:
104:
338:
Insofar as notability, the multiple references cited clearly indicate it has had a long-term effect on its industry internationally sufficient to meet
461:
409:. But almost all of the Scholar refs are their own conference PDFs (non-independent). On Newspapers.com, the refs I found are sadly trivial/routine,
222:
202:
370:
not like an advertisement — but if you have specific concerns remaining, I hope you'll share so that I can work on them. Mahalo!
79:
27:
132:
421:
from minor local newspapers. Therefore, IMHO asserting the quantities is insufficient, we need concrete refs.
386:
343:
85:
342:
and has held a large and widely covered annual conference for over four decades that I think clearly meets
116:
98:
230:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
148:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
390:
347:
361:(where it was deleted due to being a copyvio and not on other merits), it has had decades of coverage
394:
351:
20:
429:
375:
315:
293:
434:
402:
379:
320:
297:
362:
145:
398:
339:
423:
371:
309:
289:
445:
227:
214:
196:
122:
30:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
397:
are relevant, but it isn't applicable as this article need to meet
332:
328:
307:
Article is likely non-notable and has puffery, will AfD soon.
65:
15:
78:
This article has not yet been rated on
Knowledge (XXG)'s
226:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
144:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
260:This article has not yet received a rating on the
178:This article has not yet received a rating on the
457:Unknown-importance Telecommunications articles
158:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Telecommunications
8:
191:
93:
71:
69:
240:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Organizations
467:Unknown-importance organization articles
407:Quantity does not determine significance
193:
161:Template:WikiProject Telecommunications
95:
452:Unassessed Telecommunications articles
406:
7:
220:This article is within the scope of
138:This article is within the scope of
84:It is of interest to the following
472:WikiProject Organizations articles
243:Template:WikiProject Organizations
14:
462:Unassessed organization articles
213:
195:
125:
115:
97:
70:
19:
26:This article was nominated for
141:WikiProject Telecommunications
1:
234:and see a list of open tasks.
152:and see a list of open tasks.
435:02:19, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
380:01:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
321:00:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
298:06:48, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
164:Telecommunications articles
488:
262:project's importance scale
180:project's importance scale
40:, September 12, 2018, see
259:
223:WikiProject Organizations
208:
177:
110:
92:
133:Telecommunication portal
357:As noted in its prior
50:, March 11, 2009, see
246:organization articles
359:deletion discussion
303:Advert + Notability
285:deletion discussion
155:Telecommunications
146:Telecommunications
105:Telecommunications
80:content assessment
276:
275:
272:
271:
268:
267:
190:
189:
186:
185:
64:
63:
60:
59:
479:
432:
426:
318:
312:
248:
247:
244:
241:
238:
217:
210:
209:
199:
192:
166:
165:
162:
159:
156:
135:
130:
129:
128:
119:
112:
111:
101:
94:
75:
74:
73:
66:
32:
31:
23:
16:
487:
486:
482:
481:
480:
478:
477:
476:
442:
441:
430:
424:
316:
310:
305:
281:
245:
242:
239:
236:
235:
163:
160:
157:
154:
153:
131:
126:
124:
12:
11:
5:
485:
483:
475:
474:
469:
464:
459:
454:
444:
443:
440:
439:
438:
437:
387:WP:PERSISTENCE
367:
355:
344:WP:PERSISTENCE
336:
304:
301:
280:
277:
274:
273:
270:
269:
266:
265:
258:
252:
251:
249:
232:the discussion
218:
206:
205:
200:
188:
187:
184:
183:
176:
170:
169:
167:
150:the discussion
137:
136:
120:
108:
107:
102:
90:
89:
83:
76:
62:
61:
58:
57:
56:
55:
45:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
484:
473:
470:
468:
465:
463:
460:
458:
455:
453:
450:
449:
447:
436:
433:
428:
427:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
368:
364:
360:
356:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
330:
325:
324:
323:
322:
319:
314:
313:
302:
300:
299:
295:
291:
286:
278:
263:
257:
254:
253:
250:
237:Organizations
233:
229:
228:Organizations
225:
224:
219:
216:
212:
211:
207:
204:
203:Organizations
201:
198:
194:
181:
175:
172:
171:
168:
151:
147:
143:
142:
134:
123:
121:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
100:
96:
91:
87:
81:
77:
68:
67:
53:
49:
48:speedy delete
46:
43:
39:
36:
35:
34:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
422:
401:rather than
308:
306:
282:
221:
139:
86:WikiProjects
47:
37:
391:WP:GEOSCOPE
348:WP:GEOSCOPE
446:Categories
395:WP:LASTING
352:WP:LASTING
279:Notability
52:discussion
42:discussion
425:VickKiang
403:WP:NEVENT
372:NapaCaGuy
335:article).
311:VickKiang
290:NapaCaGuy
366:checked.
363:WP:DEPTH
28:deletion
399:WP:NORG
431:(talk)
393:, and
350:, and
340:WP:ORG
317:(talk)
82:scale.
376:talk
333:CTIA
329:GSMA
294:talk
256:???
174:???
38:CSD
448::
417:,
413:,
389:,
378:)
346:,
296:)
419:3
415:2
411:1
374:(
354:.
292:(
264:.
182:.
88::
54:.
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
