514:; although statements like "Panzuriel's shamans and priests are, for the most part, mere rabble raised from a variety of different races" make sense from a fictional standpoint, it does not in anyway reflect reality. Even if you can find a citation that identifies the source of this statement, it still represents a (fictional) statement of fact which is not true in reality. I think only a complete rewrite of this article, eliminating the in universe perpective, will release this article from the grips of
345:
327:
198:
22:
84:
494:. I am asking though for some time (that is no AFDs on these articles) to figure out what I need to do, how to do it, and then actually do it. Not something I am going to get done in a week. BUT if allowed to do it will reduce the multitude of these D&D Deities to a couple of pages. That should be a solution that everyone likes.
53:
490:
Wow that is walk down memory lane, pulling down a 2nd Ed book I have not touched in years. There are no COPYVIOs and no OR. NOW I could go through and properly cite everything here so there is no question about anything. Pull up multiple sources from the few hundred D&D books I own, but what's
568:
I am sitting in my office now looking over book cases of about 1,500 books on mythology, occultism and various topics and none of those would be primary source material for this article. Nothing develops in a vacuum, especially not RPGS. Just because YOU can't find anything doesn't mean I can't.
549:
If we are going to discuss this article honestly, then my view is that even if you rewrite, it will be difficult to find reliable secondary sources that will provide evidence notability, but also it will be difficult to find sufficient non-trivial real-world content to write a decent encyclopedic
534:
Actually I did find the citations, quite a few in fact, it's just that even given that I'd rather rewrite the article whole cloth. Something that will take time. So here are my choices. Quickly cite a sub-par article to a point where it will survive any review process OR take the time needed to
589:
Suggest you at least reference the "mere rabble" comment, as that seems to have struck a nerve with Gavin. There might be a few other statements that need citations. This isn't a case of either cite this article OR re-write a new article... do both.
461:
sourced, and so the assumption is that these statements are backed by at least one of the provided sources. What is needed is inline citations, to tell us which of the sources (and where in those sources) support which specific statements.
456:
Commenting due to request at WT:NOR... I tend to agree with
Webwarlock. Since we are talking about specific statements and not entire lines of reasoning, I think {{fact}} taging is more appropriate than a blanket OR tag. The article
628:
476:
I will pull my copy tonight and have a look. I will also make sure that no violations of COPYVIO have been made, that is a pet peeve of mine and I try to remove them when I can. Thank you.
508:
Whilst I agree the lack of inline citation is the primary issue, I am still sticking with my view that this article contains multiple unsupstantiated claims about this ficitonal character.
623:
618:
142:
132:
638:
422:
Add a citation tag. OR is not applicable. Revert this and I will take it as a unwarrented edit-waring. Do some research first then come back here, that is what I am doing.
550:
article. I would recomend merger, and save your good efforts for topics which are the subject of a wide range of sources which are independent of primary sourc material. --
643:
108:
361:
633:
97:
58:
352:
332:
74:
535:
rewrite or merge this with others so that it is a much better entry (and maybe even fewer entries). So do you want it done now or done right?
239:
235:
290:
299:
227:
89:
33:
264:
278:
491:
the point? Honestly this needs to be condensed on to anotehr page, a project that I have already mentioned here
436:
Please feel free to disagree. Would you like to obtain a third opinion to settle this difference of opinion? --
403:
Panzuriel's shamans and priests are, for the most part, mere rabble raised from a variety of different races.
107:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the
555:
523:
492:
441:
412:
271:
21:
256:
39:
186:
103:
574:
540:
511:
499:
481:
427:
569:
HOWEVER. I am in favor of many, multiple mergers of a lot of these topics. It will take me time.
360:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
595:
551:
519:
467:
437:
408:
231:
210:
357:
570:
536:
495:
477:
423:
246:
221:
197:
612:
591:
515:
463:
295:
344:
326:
399:
This article contains opinions and views not supported by citations, such as:
79:
260:
83:
73:
52:
407:
I have therefore added a cleaup template to address this issue. --
629:
Redirect-Class
Dungeons & Dragons articles of Low-importance
599:
578:
559:
544:
527:
503:
485:
471:
445:
431:
416:
15:
111:, where you can join the project and find out how to help!
177:
172:
167:
162:
510:
The source of this problem is the over reliance on an
356:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
624:Low-importance Dungeons & Dragons articles
619:Redirect-Class Dungeons & Dragons articles
8:
117:Knowledge:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons
639:Redirect-Class fictional character articles
277:add sources to novels planned for merge to
120:Template:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons
370:Knowledge:WikiProject Fictional characters
321:
205:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
150:
47:
644:WikiProject Fictional characters articles
373:Template:WikiProject Fictional characters
95:This redirect is within the scope of the
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
323:
49:
350:This redirect is within the scope of
19:
7:
236:Variant Dungeons & Dragons games
634:All Dungeons & Dragons articles
38:It is of interest to the following
98:Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject
14:
353:WikiProject Fictional characters
343:
325:
196:
137:This redirect has been rated as
82:
72:
51:
20:
123:Dungeons & Dragons articles
1:
600:03:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
579:14:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
560:13:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
545:12:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
528:09:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
504:01:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
486:20:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
472:18:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
446:17:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
432:16:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
417:16:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
364:and see a list of open tasks.
300:Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)
253:Rewrite to be out-of-universe
90:Dungeons & Dragons portal
376:fictional character articles
265:Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
228:Dungeoneer's Survival Guide
660:
279:List of Dragonlance novels
143:project's importance scale
338:
149:
136:
67:
46:
512:in universe perspective
405:
257:Companions of the Hall
114:Dungeons & Dragons
104:Dungeons & Dragons
59:Dungeons & Dragons
401:
367:Fictional characters
358:fictional characters
333:Fictional characters
232:Swords & Spells
34:content assessment
395:Original research
392:
391:
388:
387:
384:
383:
320:
319:
316:
315:
312:
311:
308:
307:
189:
651:
378:
377:
374:
371:
368:
347:
340:
339:
329:
322:
216:Various articles
200:
193:
192:
185:
151:
125:
124:
121:
118:
115:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
659:
658:
654:
653:
652:
650:
649:
648:
609:
608:
397:
375:
372:
369:
366:
365:
304:
191:
182:
122:
119:
116:
113:
112:
88:
81:
61:
12:
11:
5:
657:
655:
647:
646:
641:
636:
631:
626:
621:
611:
610:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
563:
562:
531:
530:
509:
488:
451:
450:
449:
448:
396:
393:
390:
389:
386:
385:
382:
381:
379:
362:the discussion
348:
336:
335:
330:
318:
317:
314:
313:
310:
309:
306:
305:
303:
302:
281:
267:
242:
217:
204:
202:
201:
183:
181:
180:
175:
170:
165:
159:
156:
155:
154:D&D to-do:
147:
146:
139:Low-importance
135:
129:
128:
126:
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
656:
645:
642:
640:
637:
635:
632:
630:
627:
625:
622:
620:
617:
616:
614:
601:
597:
593:
588:
580:
576:
572:
567:
566:
565:
564:
561:
557:
553:
552:Gavin Collins
548:
547:
546:
542:
538:
533:
532:
529:
525:
521:
520:Gavin Collins
517:
513:
507:
506:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:
473:
469:
465:
460:
455:
454:
453:
452:
447:
443:
439:
438:Gavin Collins
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
421:
420:
419:
418:
414:
410:
409:Gavin Collins
404:
400:
394:
380:
363:
359:
355:
354:
349:
346:
342:
341:
337:
334:
331:
328:
324:
301:
297:
294:
292:
291:Collaboration
288:
286:
282:
280:
276:
274:
273:
268:
266:
262:
258:
254:
251:
249:
248:
243:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
224:
223:
218:
215:
213:
212:
207:
206:
203:
199:
195:
194:
190:
188:
179:
176:
174:
171:
169:
166:
164:
161:
160:
158:
157:
153:
152:
148:
144:
140:
134:
131:
130:
127:
110:
106:
105:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
458:
406:
402:
398:
351:
296:Dave Arneson
289:
284:
283:
270:
269:
252:
245:
244:
220:
219:
209:
208:
184:
138:
102:
96:
40:WikiProjects
29:
571:Web Warlock
537:Web Warlock
496:Web Warlock
478:Web Warlock
424:Web Warlock
613:Categories
109:discussion
592:Blueboar
464:Blueboar
261:Dark Sun
30:redirect
240:More...
168:history
141:on the
516:WP:NOR
272:Verify
247:Update
36:scale.
285:Other
222:Stubs
211:Merge
178:purge
173:watch
28:This
596:talk
575:talk
556:talk
541:talk
524:talk
518:. --
500:talk
482:talk
468:talk
442:talk
428:talk
413:talk
187:view
163:edit
133:Low
615::
598:)
577:)
558:)
543:)
526:)
502:)
484:)
470:)
459:is
444:)
430:)
415:)
298:,
263:,
259:,
255::
238:,
234:,
230:,
594:(
573:(
554:(
539:(
522:(
498:(
480:(
466:(
440:(
426:(
411:(
293::
287::
275::
250::
225::
214::
145:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
