67:
49:
22:
143:
I performed a long-overdue copy edit on the page. I changed several translations to better match other articles on
Knowledge (XXG). I added a number of links. I found that many of the references back to the organization's website no longer work. Also, some of the information is well out of date and
279:
The
English version of this article is practically solely based on the self-representation of the project. There are many independent sources in the German article. Probably there will also be articles in English about the idea. To me it seems likely that this article has been edited by some kind of
256:
Putting a link where it does not really belong does not convince anyone that the article should be here. There is an easy and sensible way to link here by just adding links from the pages of politicians listed in the project. I would very much prefer this article to appear under abgeordnetenwatch
257:
because that's the lable under which it is known. Hardly anyone knows that there is an entity behind it with a mixed German
English name, and translating it here violates the rule that articles should be named after what the topic is typically referred to.
241:
mention, especially since it seems like the idea is spreading in Europe. Perhaps there's a better way to do it? As I said, this seems like a good thing to have in an encyclopedia, and I'd hate to see it up for deletion because it's orphaned. //
144:
hasn't been updated in a while. This seems like an interesting project, and I think it'd be a shame if this article were deleted. Toward that end, I added incoming links from a few related pages, in hopes of de-orphaning it. //
229:
that the articles should be merged as they are duplicative. However, I'm not sure if the best name is "Parlamentwatch" (from the German name of the entity) or "Parliamentwatch" (the
English translation of
307:
82:
54:
280:
PR team of abgeordnetenwatch that does not understand what
Knowledge (XXG) is for. If so, you are welcome here, but you need to reveal yourself as per
121:
The reference for the Adolf Grimme Award is broken, and I cannot find any other link that supports the assertion. The published nominees and winners
234:). My concern is that readers of the English wikipedia might mistakenly assume that the German spelling is a correct English spelling.
124:
don't seem to include
Parliamentwatch, at least not that I can see through Google Translate. Can anyone provide a working reference?
281:
29:
185:. If both articles are basically about the same thing, they should be merged. The appropriate title would seem to be
177:
GmbH (without the 'i'), a private limited company in
Germany. The portal run by the company appears to be called
35:
289:
262:
285:
258:
247:
193:
182:
149:
129:
216:
197:
201:
301:
243:
145:
125:
77:
73:
237:
As for
European Parliament, it seemed borderline to me too, but I think it merits
66:
48:
212:
173:(with a space), but the article is not about that. There is an entity called
211:
entry at
European Parliament. That would appear to give it undue weight. --
293:
266:
251:
220:
153:
133:
122:
15:
28:
This article has not yet been rated on
Knowledge (XXG)'s
275:
External sources and suspicion of Conflict of Interest
204:. The new article would probably also need a rewrite.
308:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
181:. There is already an article about that, called
92:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
8:
95:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
43:
21:
19:
207:I am also not sure this topic warrants a
45:
7:
282:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of Interest
34:It is of interest to the following
14:
192:So my proposal would be to merge
189:(which is currently a redirect).
65:
47:
20:
165:I cannot find an entity called
294:10:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
267:10:32, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
252:17:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
221:09:11, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
154:00:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
98:Guild of Copy Editors articles
1:
134:23:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
284:. Please read those rules.
324:
60:
42:
169:. I found a blog called
86:, on 9 September 2010.
89:Guild of Copy Editors
83:Guild of Copy Editors
55:Guild of Copy Editors
179:abgeordnetenwatch.de
80:, a member of the
30:content assessment
232:abgeordnetenwatch
194:abgeordnetenwatch
183:abgeordnetenwatch
114:
113:
110:
109:
106:
105:
72:This article was
315:
171:Parliament Watch
100:
99:
96:
93:
90:
69:
62:
61:
51:
44:
25:
24:
23:
16:
323:
322:
318:
317:
316:
314:
313:
312:
298:
297:
277:
198:Parliamentwatch
167:Parliamentwatch
163:I am confused.
161:
141:
119:
97:
94:
91:
88:
87:
12:
11:
5:
321:
319:
311:
310:
300:
299:
276:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
235:
202:Parlamentwatch
187:Parlamentwatch
175:Parlamentwatch
164:
160:
159:Merge and move
157:
140:
137:
118:
115:
112:
111:
108:
107:
104:
103:
101:
70:
58:
57:
52:
40:
39:
33:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
320:
309:
306:
305:
303:
296:
295:
291:
287:
286:Omikroergosum
283:
274:
268:
264:
260:
259:Omikroergosum
255:
254:
253:
249:
245:
240:
236:
233:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
205:
203:
199:
195:
190:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
158:
156:
155:
151:
147:
138:
136:
135:
131:
127:
123:
116:
102:
85:
84:
79:
75:
71:
68:
64:
63:
59:
56:
53:
50:
46:
41:
37:
31:
27:
18:
17:
278:
238:
231:
226:
208:
206:
191:
186:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
142:
120:
81:
36:WikiProjects
74:copy edited
139:Copy edit
302:Category
244:⌘macwhiz
209:See also
146:⌘macwhiz
126:⌘macwhiz
78:Macwhiz
227:Concur
117:Award?
32:scale.
213:Boson
290:talk
263:talk
248:talk
239:some
217:talk
196:and
150:talk
130:talk
200:at
76:by
304::
292:)
265:)
250:)
219:)
152:)
132:)
288:(
261:(
246:(
215:(
148:(
128:(
38::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
