416:
detail on what those factors are. The article also mentions that performance psychology is a growing field in sports and business, but is doesn't touch on in what other professions. It references the relationship to sports briefly and then it jumps to how it should be applied to front line workers and that if they aren't motivated or trained that will not succeed. I think there should be additional supporting facts. The field is a very broad field and research can lead it into many different directions. I think as this page grows, several different specific topics will be expanded upon such as how it is applied in sports, corporate management and the front line workers, mental and motivational facotrs that improve performance, focus, leadership and many more. I look forward to taking the opportunity to work on this page.(
541:
www.mindtools.com as "Career developmental Skills" (which is not the title of the website) doesn't give the reader any clue of what that link is before they click on it; the same applies to labeling www.brianmac.co.uk/psych.htm as "Psychology", and most of the rest of the references on the page. Normally I would try to give examples of how to properly format a reference, but since most of these references are inappropriate and need to be removed anyway I think it will be better for you just to look at a better-developed article, like
21:
621:
etc. to domains other than sports. This tight connection is clear from this article, which is dominated by a long section on sport psychology. So there's likely an article that could be written here, but the one we presently have is effectively unsourced, written like an advertisement, and doing more harm than good. Since the distinction seems largely to be based on clientele rather than methods/basis, and because the article for
327:
306:
465:
275:
496:
337:
620:
Sources exist, to be sure, but I'm noticing that in the scholarly psychology literature, "performance psychology" is based on sport psychology, which reframed itself as a sub-field of performance psychology in order to create an umbrella that covers application of sport psychology ideas, techniques,
519:
Furthermore, the article contains no references demonstrating that this field has produced any academic literature in peer-reviewed publications, which leads me to believe that this is a "self-help"-like pseudoscience. But that's really beside the point here; the problem with references is enough to
436:
The graphic at the head of the article needs to be elaborated on. Its legend, simply 'Relative performance' means little. It would ideally need to have clear axes and scales, and the legend could be expanded on; instead of being at the top, the graphic ought to be located within a section that deals
468:
Tagged "POV", article reads like a press release for its topic. Long paragraphs with a single "reference", which in one case went to the home page of mindtools.com, where no discernible support for the claims in that paragraph were found. Sorry but this is not ready for the main page. For a better
415:
This article on
Performance Psychology has a good general overview and was relatively useful. I think that there is plenty of room to expand on this topic. The first sentence mentions that performance psychology studies the factors that allows people to succeed in society, but it doesn't go into
616:
website (which, as a popular psychology publication, is pretty poor). The article was ad-like and even cited commercially-motivated websites of some of its practitioners (and tagged for both issues for a long time). So I removed the bad sources, the worst links, some big, unsourced claims, and
540:
On a side note, the way the references are displayed in the page is also not ideal. The links are hidden behind misleading titles. References should give accurate and full reference information (the title of the page, publisher, author, date written, and date accessed). Labeling, for instance,
511:, appears to be a partial Knowledge (XXG) mirror, as some of its content is identical to the article's. (I'm assuming good faith and supposing that that site updated itself to be a copy of the Knowledge (XXG) content, rather than supposing that the author of this article
237:
515:
some of the content of that website, which is a much more serious problem; but even if it's the site that copied
Knowledge (XXG), that just shows that the site should not be used as a reference for a Knowledge (XXG)
607:
Earlier today I noticed this article was overflowing with spammy, unreliable sources linked at the bottom of the page. After going through them I went through the cited sources. The only source which meets
32:
503:
for
Knowledge (XXG) articles are generally individual works, not just links to the front page of a website, and they are usually published in reliable outlets, not just someone's
231:
128:
393:
163:
681:
644:
Anyone wishing to contribute to this topic (i.e. the scientific study of human performance across domains and methodologies) can contribute to the page on
383:
686:
359:
169:
499:
Sorry, but the quality of referencing in the article is poor. Most of the references are links to the index page of various personal websites;
456:
47:
676:
671:
42:
114:
350:
311:
252:
183:
38:
625:
is leaps and bounds better, I'm boldly redirecting it to sport psychology for now (without prejudice to restoring/rebuilding it). —
219:
188:
104:
41:
at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
158:
84:
286:
149:
547:
522:
213:
20:
209:
193:
292:
259:
274:
512:
421:
108:
139:
443:
358:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
154:
574:
542:
486:
470:
225:
653:
645:
627:
245:
588:
The concept has good analysis and advantageous but the links are insufficient in this article.
437:
with it or where it would lend greater understanding to or illustrate elements in the text. --
417:
342:
135:
622:
613:
593:
556:
531:
438:
504:
570:
478:
609:
500:
649:
665:
464:
569:
Don't know why this is still categorized as a stub, great job on the assignment. --
657:
634:
597:
578:
560:
535:
495:
489:
445:
425:
589:
326:
305:
355:
332:
459:, so that they will still be easy to find after that review is removed.
508:
439:
268:
99:
455:
I'm pasting over some of the concerns that were mentioned at
77:
244:
354:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
51:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
258:
117:for general discussion of the article's subject.
285:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
507:, self-hosted website. One of the references,
8:
300:
56:
15:
617:started upon looking for sources myself.
33:Social sciences and society good articles
545:which another reviewer suggested above.
302:
368:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology
348:This redirect is within the scope of
272:
7:
291:It is of interest to the following
107:for discussing improvements to the
682:Mid-importance psychology articles
14:
134:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
494:
463:
388:This redirect has been rated as
335:
325:
304:
273:
129:Click here to start a new topic.
19:
687:WikiProject Psychology articles
371:Template:WikiProject Psychology
612:remotely is an article on the
520:reject this article from DYK.
509:http://www.geoffgreenwood.com/
37:nominee, but did not meet the
1:
658:17:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
362:and see a list of open tasks.
126:Put new text under old text.
677:NA-Class psychology articles
672:Former good article nominees
546:
521:
432:Relative performance graphic
598:16:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
703:
394:project's importance scale
45:. Editors may also seek a
579:20:39, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
561:01:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
536:01:07, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
490:00:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
469:article model, check out
457:this article's DYK review
446:06:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
387:
320:
299:
164:Be welcoming to newcomers
59:
55:
635:03:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
426:22:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
603:Page problems, redirect
351:WikiProject Psychology
159:avoid personal attacks
109:Performance psychology
27:Performance psychology
411:Scope for Improvement
184:Neutral point of view
39:good article criteria
543:Cognitive psychology
471:Cognitive psychology
189:No original research
85:Good article nominee
646:Performance science
640:Performance Science
374:psychology articles
287:content assessment
170:dispute resolution
131:
60:Article milestones
451:Comments from DYK
408:
407:
404:
403:
400:
399:
343:Psychology portal
267:
266:
150:Assume good faith
127:
98:
97:
94:
93:
694:
632:
630:
623:sport psychology
614:Psychology Today
551:
526:
501:reliable sources
498:
488:
485:
481:
467:
441:
376:
375:
372:
369:
366:
345:
340:
339:
338:
329:
322:
321:
316:
308:
301:
278:
277:
269:
263:
262:
248:
179:Article policies
100:
80:
57:
23:
16:
702:
701:
697:
696:
695:
693:
692:
691:
662:
661:
642:
628:
626:
605:
586:
549:
524:
479:
475:
474:
453:
434:
413:
373:
370:
367:
364:
363:
341:
336:
334:
314:
205:
200:
199:
198:
175:
145:
76:
12:
11:
5:
700:
698:
690:
689:
684:
679:
674:
664:
663:
641:
638:
629:Rhododendrites
604:
601:
585:
582:
568:
566:
565:
564:
563:
538:
517:
505:self-published
452:
449:
433:
430:
412:
409:
406:
405:
402:
401:
398:
397:
390:Mid-importance
386:
380:
379:
377:
360:the discussion
347:
346:
330:
318:
317:
315:Mid‑importance
309:
297:
296:
290:
279:
265:
264:
202:
201:
197:
196:
191:
186:
177:
176:
174:
173:
166:
161:
152:
146:
144:
143:
132:
123:
122:
119:
118:
112:
96:
95:
92:
91:
88:
81:
73:
72:
69:
66:
62:
61:
53:
52:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
699:
688:
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
673:
670:
669:
667:
660:
659:
655:
651:
647:
639:
637:
636:
631:
624:
618:
615:
611:
602:
600:
599:
595:
591:
583:
581:
580:
576:
572:
562:
558:
554:
553:
544:
539:
537:
533:
529:
528:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
497:
493:
492:
491:
487:
484:
483:
482:
472:
466:
462:
461:
460:
458:
450:
448:
447:
444:
442:
431:
429:
427:
423:
419:
410:
395:
391:
385:
382:
381:
378:
361:
357:
353:
352:
344:
333:
331:
328:
324:
323:
319:
313:
310:
307:
303:
298:
294:
288:
284:
280:
276:
271:
270:
261:
257:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
211:
208:
207:Find sources:
204:
203:
195:
194:Verifiability
192:
190:
187:
185:
182:
181:
180:
171:
167:
165:
162:
160:
156:
153:
151:
148:
147:
141:
137:
136:Learn to edit
133:
130:
125:
124:
121:
120:
116:
110:
106:
102:
101:
89:
87:
86:
82:
79:
78:July 22, 2011
75:
74:
70:
67:
64:
63:
58:
54:
50:
49:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
643:
619:
606:
587:
567:
477:
476:
454:
435:
418:WheelsDudley
414:
389:
349:
293:WikiProjects
282:
255:
249:
241:
234:
228:
222:
216:
206:
178:
103:This is the
83:
48:reassessment
46:
31:
30:
26:
513:plagiarized
440:Ohconfucius
232:free images
115:not a forum
43:renominated
666:Categories
571:Moderndope
480:Sharktopus
365:Psychology
356:Psychology
312:Psychology
90:Not listed
516:article.)
172:if needed
155:Be polite
111:redirect.
105:talk page
283:redirect
140:get help
113:This is
650:geordie
392:on the
238:WP refs
226:scholar
68:Process
590:Lizia7
289:scale.
210:Google
71:Result
29:was a
610:WP:RS
584:links
281:This
253:JSTOR
214:books
168:Seek
654:talk
594:talk
575:talk
557:talk
552:anaɢ
532:talk
527:anaɢ
422:talk
246:FENS
220:news
157:and
65:Date
633:\\
473:.
384:Mid
260:TWL
668::
656:)
648:.
596:)
577:)
559:)
534:)
428:)
424:)
240:)
138:;
652:(
592:(
573:(
555:(
550:ʨ
548:r
530:(
525:ʨ
523:r
420:(
396:.
295::
256:·
250:·
242:·
235:·
229:·
223:·
217:·
212:(
142:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
