Knowledge

Talk:Pilot (Suits)

Source đź“ť

240: 170: 85: 21: 160: 133: 102: 280:
section is basically summing up what each reviewer commented. But it isn't in any type of organized other than the order I read the reviews. I just left them there to provide some sort of critical commentary and an attempt to immediately establish notability. I personally, am terrible at writing a
307:
Ok, I think there is something missing here... "The episode was watched by an estimated 4.64 viewers"... 4.64 viewers, that is a pretty precise and unusually number... plus, I would think that fewer than 5 viewers wouldn't get a second
249: 143: 413: 254: 77: 418: 403: 230: 220: 408: 323:
Thank you for catching that! The word million is missing. It's supposed to say "The episode was watched by an estimated 4.64 million viewers." ~Cheers,
423: 393: 73: 192: 398: 196: 345: 309: 183: 138: 369: 334: 292: 113: 281:
proper reception section, other than locating these reviews. Anyway, I'm just putting it out there. ~Cheers,
364: 329: 287: 349: 313: 119: 36: 101: 359: 324: 282: 20: 175: 60: 188: 239: 55: 358:
Ah, whoops. I just don't like typing that figure correctly, do I? Thank you! ~Cheers,
387: 344:
The one I was referring to was in the lede, but I fixed it now that I know the number
277: 65: 169: 191:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can 51: 41: 165: 31: 187:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about 374: 353: 339: 317: 297: 159: 132: 95: 15: 238: 83: 58:
ice cream in five cities to promote the broadcast of the
76:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 195:. To improve this article, please refer to the 78:Template:Did you know nominations/Pilot (Suits) 8: 127: 44:). The text of the entry was as follows: 414:Low-importance Episode coverage articles 129: 99: 74:Knowledge:Recent additions/2012/August 72:A record of the entry may be seen at 7: 419:Episode coverage task force articles 181:This article is within the scope of 118:It is of interest to the following 404:Low-importance television articles 14: 409:C-Class Episode coverage articles 84: 205:Knowledge:WikiProject Television 168: 158: 131: 100: 19: 424:WikiProject Television articles 394:Knowledge Did you know articles 250:the Episode coverage task force 225:This article has been rated as 208:Template:WikiProject Television 1: 247:This article is supported by 399:C-Class television articles 375:20:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 354:20:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 340:18:50, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 318:18:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 303:Pretty accurate estimate... 440: 298:23:48, 9 August 2012 (UTC) 231:project's importance scale 40:column on 27 August 2012 ( 246: 224: 153: 126: 30:appeared on Knowledge's 243: 184:WikiProject Television 108:This article is rated 89: 242: 199:for the type of work. 87: 211:television articles 193:join the discussion 189:television programs 278:critical reception 244: 114:content assessment 90: 272:Reception section 269: 268: 265: 264: 261: 260: 176:Television portal 94: 93: 431: 372: 367: 362: 337: 332: 327: 295: 290: 285: 213: 212: 209: 206: 203: 197:style guidelines 178: 173: 172: 162: 155: 154: 149: 146: 144:Episode coverage 135: 128: 111: 105: 104: 96: 86: 23: 16: 439: 438: 434: 433: 432: 430: 429: 428: 384: 383: 370: 365: 360: 335: 330: 325: 305: 293: 288: 283: 274: 210: 207: 204: 201: 200: 174: 167: 147: 141: 112:on Knowledge's 109: 12: 11: 5: 437: 435: 427: 426: 421: 416: 411: 406: 401: 396: 386: 385: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 304: 301: 273: 270: 267: 266: 263: 262: 259: 258: 255:Low-importance 245: 235: 234: 227:Low-importance 223: 217: 216: 214: 180: 179: 163: 151: 150: 148:Low‑importance 136: 124: 123: 117: 106: 92: 91: 81: 71: 70: 54:gave out free 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 436: 425: 422: 420: 417: 415: 412: 410: 407: 405: 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 391: 389: 376: 373: 368: 363: 357: 356: 355: 351: 347: 343: 342: 341: 338: 333: 328: 322: 321: 320: 319: 315: 311: 302: 300: 299: 296: 291: 286: 279: 271: 256: 253:(assessed as 252: 251: 241: 237: 236: 232: 228: 222: 219: 218: 215: 198: 194: 190: 186: 185: 177: 171: 166: 164: 161: 157: 156: 152: 145: 140: 137: 134: 130: 125: 121: 115: 107: 103: 98: 97: 82: 79: 75: 68: 67: 66:pilot episode 63: 62: 57: 53: 49: 46: 45: 43: 39: 38: 33: 29: 28:Pilot (Suits) 25: 22: 18: 17: 346:74.124.47.11 310:74.124.47.11 306: 275: 248: 226: 182: 120:WikiProjects 64: 59: 48:Did you know 47: 37:Did you know 35: 27: 26:A fact from 56:Häagen-Dazs 52:USA Network 42:check views 388:Categories 202:Television 139:Television 88:Knowledge 50:... that 32:Main Page 371:Parasol 336:Parasol 308:airing. 294:Parasol 229:on the 110:C-class 34:in the 116:scale. 61:Suits 350:talk 314:talk 276:The 366:Ton 361:Ten 331:Ton 326:Ten 289:Ton 284:Ten 221:Low 390:: 352:) 316:) 257:). 142:: 348:( 312:( 233:. 122:: 80:. 69:?

Index


Main Page
Did you know
check views
USA Network
Häagen-Dazs
Suits
pilot episode
Knowledge:Recent additions/2012/August
Template:Did you know nominations/Pilot (Suits)

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Television
Episode coverage
WikiProject icon
icon
Television portal
WikiProject Television
television programs
join the discussion
style guidelines
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
the Episode coverage task force
Low-importance
critical reception
Ten

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑