1188:
in respect of Hong Kong is not the point with which we are to be primarily concerned. The question is what is meant by the two
Chinese terms. I am frankly astonished at what lmmnhn has suggested about 建制派 and 親建制派. Those editors who read Chinese will instantly see that this is not a case of abbreviation at all. It is plain and simple qualification by 親. You have the camp itself and then you have its sympathisers, affiliates, or even "running dogs" as the PRC used to be fond of calling them. There is a fundamental problem with the rote-blabbing of "camp" all the time, as if one could put one's hands around such a thing in any political system, but leaving that to one side for the moment, there is no problem at all seeing what is staring us in the face in the Chinese terms here. If some members of the Chinese press use the terms with reckless disregard that is no basis for replicating that lack of care in WP. In any event, we have seen the climb-down from Lmmnhn. What we are left with is either to leave the English as a faithful translation of the Chinese (i.e. establishment and pro-establishment) or take out establishment/建制派 entirely.
530:
658:
630:
520:
492:
1787:, then Pro-Beijing camp should not be a redirect here but should be a disambiguation page for this and the Macau article, and any other relevant articles. If we are going to keep the redirect, then there is no point keeping this in parenthetical disambiguated form. The outcome of the above RM seems to suggest Pro-Beijing camp should be a disambiguation page, and I considered changing it myself but frankly there are way way way too many direct links to
985:
352:
318:
362:
668:
2058:
1089:
975:
947:
596:
506:
243:
452:
287:
1051:
734:
338:
961:
644:
428:
21:
1239:
Agreed with above; inclusion on the infobox gives the impression that her position is 'Chief
Executive of the Pro-Beijing camp' rather than the CE who happens to be from the Pro-Beijing camp. It should be removed from the infobox but mention given in the body text that her, Tsang Yok-sing, and other
1187:
Noted Lmmnhn's view has changed. Lmmnhn rejected my edit on the basis that "'Establishment camp' does not exist in the
English media" but now concedes that it does. But that leading, highly-respected international purveyors of news about Hong Kong (AFP, FT, etc.) use the term "establishment camp"
1441:
either since it appeared in the public press, and was not phrased as fact in the article, but was merely a comment on a legitimate public discussion. I would also argue that there are plenty of
American, British, Australian, etc political figures whose articles mention suspected links to organised
1387:
I've just read the policy and it seems to say, fairly explicitly, that it is meant to apply to people who are not public figures, which does not include anybody named in this section. Also, having links to triads is not in itself a crime, so this policy should probably not apply to this section at
1332:
Pro-Beijing camp basically is an alliance of pro-Beijing political parties that would field politicians as candidates in elections. It's not an ideology alliance for anyone. Carrie Lam is "aligned" (sharing the ideology) with Pro-Beijing camp, but she isn't part of the Pro-Beijing camp because she
1152:
It seems this anonymous contributor may have inadvertently transposed part of his/her comment because 建制派 was in and 親建制派 was not. Secondly, one is not to be misled by the opening statement "pro-Beijing camp is just called '建制派'" which is just sloppy translation in the comment: Beijing does not
1317:
Pro-Beijing camp is not a party. It is a political alliance, the "united front" of the "patriotic forces" by the People's
Republic of China who have repeatedly said that the SAR government shall be ruled by the patriotic forces. To claim that one person is not affiliated with any political party
1199:
1197:
It is interesting that how you can make such a rant between I saying "does not exist" and "hardly exist", as the meaning will be the same: that "establishment camp" is hardly in use and therefore should not be put in the header. I googled it and there are only 10 results with "establishment
1171:
insists to put the name "establishment camp" in the header, but the fact is there is hardly a thing called "establishment camp" in the
English media. What most of them use is "pro-establishment camp", which means "親建制派" in Chinese, and "建制派" is merely an abbreviation of the term.
1284:
Except they are literally still members of those parties, Carrie Lam is not (by law) a member of any political party. This also doesn't address my previous point about giving a misleading impression in the article that she is the 'CE of the Pro-BJ camp', which she is
1223:
It appears someone is very much confused with "pro-Beijing faction" and "Pro-Beijing camp". Carrie Lam as Chief
Executive is non-partisan, even she's pro-Beijing but she doesn't represent Pro-Beijing camp in the government. Her name should be removed from infobox.
1795:) most of which look like they are indeed targeting this article and I don't have a script nor know of any bot I can invoke to fix that. Frankly I'm not sure if the above RM properly considered the primary topic issue, and the large number of links compared to
2082:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
1136:
In Hong Kong and Macau media, the pro-Beijing camp is just called "建制派", and it is NOT an abbreviation of "親建制派". The
Chinese name need NOT be a direct translation of English name. It is offending to include "親建制派" but not "建制派" in this article.
2085:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has
2008:
How about adding it to 'See also'? The
English-speaking world does not distinguish between "radical pro-Beijing" and moderate "pro-Beijing," as they are both authoritarians after all. However, "激進建制派" is even used in media in Hong Kong.
206:
1436:
I would not call the CE a "municipal politician", they are the head of the government for a political entity and more than notable in HK, which I think would be sufficient. I don't see that this section violates the
1302:
specifies CE cannot be a member of political party. Hong Kong CE election is not a presidential election, Carrie Lam wasn't a candidate for any political party in Pro-Beijing camp when she ran for CE election.
1153:
arise in either, for a start, and, if the commenter is correct that this is not a case of abbreviation, then the only way to preserve a distinction is to translate them "pro-Beijing camp" and "Beijing camp".
1943:
The
Chinese version of this article and the Pro-Dem Camp article includes the EC, while the English article of the Pro-BJ camp of Macau also includes NPC delegates, thoughts on adding it here?
1637:- Just keep it simple, no need for the "Hong Kong" bit. "Pro-Beijing camp" is really the common name for the Pro-Beijing camp of Hong Kong, rarely you would think of Pro-Beijing camp of Macao.
1671:
there should more topics out there than just these two RECENTISM topics of Macau and HK. What about Beijing vs Taipei? The Pro-Beijing camp favours PRC having the UN seat over the ROC; etc --
2272:
2078:
36:
2322:
200:
2247:
861:
807:
97:
2312:
2277:
1703:
Clearly it is not since we are discussing the "Pro-Beijing camp". Which is what it is, in the UN, and the IOC. It is lacking historical perspective, hence RECENTISM. --
2237:
442:
437:
328:
2252:
2267:
2242:
1800:
1505:
923:
576:
2307:
1041:
1031:
915:
811:
799:
1971:
article, but why do I keep removing it? 激進建制派 is a political term that is strictly used. If the title Radical pro-Beijing camp is a problem, you just have to
1201:
in the media, which 3 of them are not addressing the Hong Kong's pro-Beijing camp. If you can provide evidences for your claims that would be very helpful.
690:
1897:, which makes them no longer non-aligned. I believe I've seen media sources referring pro-Beijing camp's seats as 89, but I cannot find it at the moment. --
263:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.
2317:
2292:
724:
714:
132:
1990:
You really need to include citations for this stuff. And, as for the page you are wikilinking to, I have yet to review the sources there. Please avoid
2232:
2227:
2067:
418:
408:
1843:
643:
337:
2297:
2262:
2217:
1007:
874:
2189:- furthermore I would really appreciate it if you would pay more attention to basic grammar in your edits before posting them to article space.
1570:
also existed. Lastly, i would like to see Google Ngram or other evidence from external source to prove it is common name/primary topic or else.
2302:
2257:
2119:
I would ask that, before this merge of material be completed, there be a review of the material in order to ensure that the sources being used
1918:
1792:
919:
878:
586:
250:
138:
1869:
836:
1566:
Not sure "Pro-Beijing camp" or "pro-establishment camp" is the common name of the coalition. But i would say there is no primary topic if
1481:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
221:
55:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
2287:
2282:
1138:
853:
840:
384:
188:
2222:
1704:
1672:
998:
952:
1917:
I oppose the color changing for the Pro-Beijing camp, as the whole camp is still controlled by the red (CCP), rather than the blue (
755:
473:
2111:
because I am concerned that much of that content is material I previously reviewed and found failed verification at the previous
1255:
552:
1584:
Hong Kong is much larger than Macau, so usage and significance for the pro-Beijing camp in Hong Kong far exceeds that in Macau.
681:
635:
266:
254:
152:
83:
375:
323:
157:
73:
182:
1370:
is a very serious policy, and the para as written was not compliant with it. I'd strongly suggest you review that policy.
127:
1494:. The oppose !votes invoke the existence of the Macau camp; the nomination doesn't provide a rationale for it being the
1968:
1531:
298:
77:
52:
178:
1517:
1114:
543:
497:
118:
1406:
I'd hesitate to call a municipal politician a public figure as described by that definition. And furthermore review
1951:
1067:
750:
689:-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to
612:
551:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
468:
1498:
for the term. No prejudice against speedy renomination if the nominator wants to make the case for that (pinging
228:
2071:
1757:
1472:
1259:
1118:
32:
2063:
2048:
1961:
1850:
1796:
1567:
1972:
1625:
1142:
272:
162:
1708:
1676:
1512:
1947:
1921:, literally "Conservatism in Hong Kong") (media often say "赤化", literally "spreading of CCP ideology").
1769:
1765:
1482:
304:
194:
1838:
Should the page use blue as political colour? Most of the Hong Kong media and even Chinese state media
1823:
1608:
1575:
960:
505:
286:
2194:
2169:
2132:
2093:
2032:
1999:
1846:
1808:
1485:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1415:
1375:
1122:
990:
214:
108:
1006:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
383:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1861:
1743:
1655:
1621:
1589:
1553:
1443:
1389:
1367:
1358:
1286:
1241:
1240:
such Pro-Beijing figures were aligned with this camp while also holding non-partisan positions.--
123:
657:
629:
1783:
I feel like I should point out that if the argument is that this is not the primary topic for
1734:
and so on gives results for both (and even for Japan, but these seems pretty obscure). Adding
1545:
1189:
1154:
1097:
519:
491:
260:
104:
48:
1922:
1873:
2155:
2014:
1980:
1902:
1788:
1784:
1659:
1541:
1495:
1447:
1438:
1407:
1393:
1323:
1290:
1275:
1245:
1206:
1177:
673:
1442:
crime, or to crimes committed themselves, so this seems acceptable in this instance to me.
2198:
2186:
2173:
2159:
2136:
2097:
2036:
2018:
2003:
1984:
1955:
1930:
1906:
1881:
1854:
1827:
1819:
1812:
1747:
1712:
1698:
1680:
1663:
1646:
1629:
1612:
1604:
1593:
1579:
1571:
1557:
1524:
1451:
1419:
1397:
1379:
1342:
1327:
1312:
1294:
1279:
1249:
1233:
1210:
1192:
1181:
1157:
1146:
367:
891:
2190:
2165:
2128:
2089:
2028:
1995:
1890:
1804:
1731:
1694:
1642:
1411:
1371:
1338:
1308:
1229:
903:
361:
351:
317:
2211:
2124:
1739:
1585:
1549:
1499:
2182:
2024:
1991:
1926:
1877:
1263:
1168:
1003:
535:
2178:
2151:
2108:
2010:
1976:
1898:
1865:
1364:
1319:
1271:
1267:
1202:
1173:
1088:
1803:) makes me think that it may very well be. (Although it's only weak evidence.)
980:
974:
946:
663:
595:
525:
357:
1690:
1638:
1334:
1304:
1225:
686:
1654:. The disambiguation in the title is helpful to contextualise the subject.
1603:. Generic title, especially considering the existence of the Macau one. --
1113:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
451:
275:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
1050:
733:
380:
1318:
therefore is not affiliated with any political camp is totally untrue.
427:
1894:
1818:
AWB is the solution. I just don't have time to fix it myself BTW.
1727:
548:
1839:
1083:
280:
237:
68:
15:
1764:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
1049:
732:
594:
450:
426:
1868:
said pro-Beijing camp won 89 district councillor seats in
2142:
I will only recover the part that you didn't add in the
1333:
isn't a member of any party within the Pro-Beijing camp.
2079:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Radical pro-Beijing camp
1844:
Blue vs. Yellow: Divide is ripping families in Hong Kong
2116:
2062:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1536:
824:
791:
786:
781:
776:
60:
56:
27:
213:
2107:
I've reverted the significant new additions made by @
1756:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
2066:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
1002:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
547:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
379:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1726:since the Macau article also exists and lookups in
685:, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all
1772:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1872:, which is quite different from most media (86).
2273:C-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
86:for general discussion of the article's subject.
2181:can you please be more careful about unsourced
1801:Special:WhatLinksHere/Pro-Beijing camp (Macau)
2323:Knowledge articles that use Hong Kong English
2164:That is still not reviewing before inclusion.
227:
8:
2248:Knowledge requested photographs in Hong Kong
1864:be categorized as pro-Beijing camp? Because
1132:Please respect the naming by Chinese people
2313:Knowledge requested images of conservatism
1620:no benefit to readers in ambiguating this
1471:The following is a closed discussion of a
1101:, which has its own spelling conventions (
941:
764:
624:
486:
312:
1779:Pro-Beijing camp should not redirect here
1738:anyway since Hong Kong is more common. --
2278:Knowledge requested photographs in China
1939:Add election committee and NPC/SC seats?
2238:Mid-importance political party articles
943:
626:
488:
314:
284:
2253:Knowledge requested images of politics
2117:Please see this history for specifics.
1793:Special:WhatLinksHere/Pro-Beijing camp
2268:Mid-importance China-related articles
2243:Political parties task force articles
1121:, this should not be changed without
7:
2308:Mid-importance Conservatism articles
1870:Template:Hong Kong political parties
1490:The result of the move request was:
996:This article is within the scope of
679:This article is within the scope of
541:This article is within the scope of
373:This article is within the scope of
2068:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
303:It is of interest to the following
76:for discussing improvements to the
1300:Chief Executive Election Ordinance
1016:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism
14:
2318:WikiProject Conservatism articles
2293:Top-importance Hong Kong articles
2076:The article will be discussed at
1019:Template:WikiProject Conservatism
2233:C-Class political party articles
2228:Low-importance politics articles
2056:
1464:Requested move 29 September 2019
1256:Republican Party (United States)
1087:
1058:An editor has requested that an
983:
973:
959:
945:
741:An editor has requested that an
666:
656:
642:
628:
603:An editor has requested that an
528:
518:
504:
490:
459:An editor has requested that an
360:
350:
336:
316:
285:
241:
98:Click here to start a new topic.
19:
1036:This article has been rated as
719:This article has been rated as
699:Knowledge:WikiProject Hong Kong
581:This article has been rated as
413:This article has been rated as
265:Content must be written from a
249:The subject of this article is
2298:WikiProject Hong Kong articles
2263:C-Class China-related articles
2218:Knowledge controversial topics
2123:the claims being made and are
1594:17:00, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
1580:09:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
1558:08:46, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
1506:closed by non-admin page mover
1452:00:05, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
1420:12:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
1398:04:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
1380:13:02, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
702:Template:WikiProject Hong Kong
393:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
1:
2303:C-Class Conservatism articles
2258:WikiProject Politics articles
1855:05:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
1828:06:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
1813:08:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
1010:and see a list of open tasks.
555:and see a list of open tasks.
435:This article is supported by
396:Template:WikiProject Politics
387:and see a list of open tasks.
95:Put new text under old text.
2148:Pro-Beijing camp (Hong Kong)
1969:Pro-Beijing camp (Hong Kong)
1907:15:32, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
1882:14:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
1532:Pro-Beijing camp (Hong Kong)
438:Political parties task force
78:Pro-Beijing camp (Hong Kong)
53:Pro-Beijing camp (Hong Kong)
2103:A more managed merge please
1748:10:52, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
1713:06:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
1699:09:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
1681:08:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
1664:14:36, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
1647:14:19, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
1630:12:50, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
1613:12:36, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
1525:14:14, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
924:...assess the un-Importance
808:...needing expert attention
561:Knowledge:WikiProject China
259:When updating the article,
103:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
2339:
2288:C-Class Hong Kong articles
2283:WikiProject China articles
2137:21:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
1042:project's importance scale
725:project's importance scale
587:project's importance scale
564:Template:WikiProject China
419:project's importance scale
2223:C-Class politics articles
2098:13:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
2037:12:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
2019:12:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
2004:12:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
1985:12:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
1343:13:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
1328:12:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
1313:11:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
1295:09:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
1280:06:50, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
1260:Democratic Party of Korea
1250:07:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
1234:13:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
1057:
1035:
968:
763:
740:
718:
651:
602:
580:
513:
458:
434:
412:
345:
311:
261:be bold, but not reckless
133:Be welcoming to newcomers
59:; for its talk page, see
2144:Radical pro-Beijing camp
2113:Radical pro-Beijing camp
2070:or whether it should be
2064:Radical pro-Beijing camp
2049:Radical pro-Beijing camp
1967:I want to add it to the
1962:Radical pro-Beijing camp
1956:16:43, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
1931:09:51, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
1893:and Co. are endorsed by
1797:Pro-Beijing camp (Macau)
1762:Please do not modify it.
1568:Pro-Beijing camp (Macau)
1478:Please do not modify it.
1211:16:21, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
1193:15:54, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
1182:15:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
1158:16:02, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
1147:08:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
999:WikiProject Conservatism
756:Wikipedians in Hong Kong
474:Wikipedians in Hong Kong
28:Radical pro-Beijing camp
2199:20:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
2174:11:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
2160:07:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
2146:article before in the
1054:
920:...assess the un-Class
916:...maintain popularity
737:
599:
567:China-related articles
455:
431:
293:This article is rated
253:and content may be in
128:avoid personal attacks
1053:
1022:Conservatism articles
736:
682:WikiProject Hong Kong
598:
454:
430:
267:neutral point of view
153:Neutral point of view
1119:relevant style guide
1115:varieties of English
898:Page creation needed
875:Start-Class articles
819:Collaboration needed
812:...without infoboxes
759:may be able to help!
477:may be able to help!
376:WikiProject Politics
158:No original research
47:. Its contents were
43:with a consensus to
1117:. According to the
991:Conservatism portal
910:Miscellaneous tasks
879:Stub-Class articles
1862:Professional Power
1164:Establishment camp
1055:
904:Requested articles
831:Improvement needed
738:
705:Hong Kong articles
600:
456:
432:
299:content assessment
139:dispute resolution
100:
31:was nominated for
1509:
1129:
1128:
1098:Hong Kong English
1082:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1074:
1073:
940:
939:
936:
935:
932:
931:
837:GA-Class articles
753:to this article.
691:join this project
623:
622:
619:
618:
544:WikiProject China
485:
484:
481:
480:
471:to this article.
399:politics articles
329:Political parties
279:
278:
236:
235:
119:Assume good faith
96:
67:
66:
2330:
2121:actually support
2060:
2059:
1948:Hkfreedomfighter
1834:Blue ribbon camp
1789:Pro-Beijing camp
1785:Pro-Beijing camp
1539:
1537:Pro-Beijing camp
1522:
1520:
1515:
1503:
1480:
1270:in the infobox.
1094:This article is
1091:
1084:
1070:to this article.
1024:
1023:
1020:
1017:
1014:
993:
988:
987:
986:
977:
970:
969:
964:
963:
962:
957:
949:
942:
854:C-Class articles
841:B-Class articles
800:Attention needed
768:Hong Kong To-do:
765:
707:
706:
703:
700:
697:
676:
674:Hong Kong portal
671:
670:
669:
660:
653:
652:
647:
646:
645:
640:
632:
625:
615:to this article.
569:
568:
565:
562:
559:
538:
533:
532:
531:
522:
515:
514:
509:
508:
507:
502:
494:
487:
401:
400:
397:
394:
391:
370:
365:
364:
354:
347:
346:
341:
340:
339:
334:
331:
320:
313:
296:
290:
289:
281:
245:
244:
238:
232:
231:
217:
148:Article policies
69:
23:
22:
16:
2338:
2337:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2208:
2207:
2105:
2087:
2061:
2057:
2053:
1965:
1941:
1836:
1781:
1776:
1535:
1518:
1513:
1511:
1476:
1466:
1362:
1221:
1166:
1134:
1123:broad consensus
1021:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1011:
989:
984:
982:
958:
955:
886:Deorphan needed
825:Recommend topic
796:
704:
701:
698:
695:
694:
672:
667:
665:
641:
638:
566:
563:
560:
557:
556:
534:
529:
527:
503:
500:
398:
395:
392:
389:
388:
368:Politics portal
366:
359:
335:
332:
326:
297:on Knowledge's
294:
242:
174:
169:
168:
167:
144:
114:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2336:
2334:
2326:
2325:
2320:
2315:
2310:
2305:
2300:
2295:
2290:
2285:
2280:
2275:
2270:
2265:
2260:
2255:
2250:
2245:
2240:
2235:
2230:
2225:
2220:
2210:
2209:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2104:
2101:
2055:
2054:
2052:
2047:Nomination of
2045:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2039:
1964:
1959:
1940:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1919:zh:商界 (香港政治派別)
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1891:Christine Fong
1885:
1884:
1847:Marxistfounder
1842:recognize it.
1835:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1774:
1758:requested move
1752:
1751:
1750:
1732:Google Scholar
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1684:
1683:
1666:
1649:
1632:
1615:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1530:
1528:
1488:
1487:
1473:requested move
1467:
1465:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1401:
1400:
1361:
1357:Please review
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1297:
1220:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1133:
1130:
1127:
1126:
1092:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1056:
1046:
1045:
1038:Mid-importance
1034:
1028:
1027:
1025:
1008:the discussion
995:
994:
978:
966:
965:
956:Mid‑importance
950:
938:
937:
934:
933:
930:
929:
928:
927:
907:
906:
895:
894:
883:
882:
858:
857:
848:Cleanup needed
845:
844:
828:
827:
816:
815:
795:
794:
789:
784:
779:
773:
770:
769:
761:
760:
739:
729:
728:
721:Top-importance
717:
711:
710:
708:
678:
677:
661:
649:
648:
639:Top‑importance
633:
621:
620:
617:
616:
601:
591:
590:
583:Mid-importance
579:
573:
572:
570:
553:the discussion
540:
539:
523:
511:
510:
501:Mid‑importance
495:
483:
482:
479:
478:
457:
447:
446:
443:Mid-importance
433:
423:
422:
415:Low-importance
411:
405:
404:
402:
385:the discussion
372:
371:
355:
343:
342:
333:Low‑importance
321:
309:
308:
302:
291:
277:
276:
246:
234:
233:
171:
170:
166:
165:
160:
155:
146:
145:
143:
142:
135:
130:
121:
115:
113:
112:
101:
92:
91:
88:
87:
81:
65:
64:
39:was closed on
37:The discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2335:
2324:
2321:
2319:
2316:
2314:
2311:
2309:
2306:
2304:
2301:
2299:
2296:
2294:
2291:
2289:
2286:
2284:
2281:
2279:
2276:
2274:
2271:
2269:
2266:
2264:
2261:
2259:
2256:
2254:
2251:
2249:
2246:
2244:
2241:
2239:
2236:
2234:
2231:
2229:
2226:
2224:
2221:
2219:
2216:
2215:
2213:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2171:
2167:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2102:
2100:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2084:
2081:
2080:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2050:
2046:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1944:
1938:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1860:Also, should
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1845:
1841:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1778:
1773:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1754:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1722:
1721:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1667:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1650:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1622:In ictu oculi
1619:
1616:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1538:
1533:
1527:
1526:
1523:
1521:
1516:
1507:
1501:
1497:
1496:primary topic
1493:
1486:
1484:
1479:
1474:
1469:
1468:
1463:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1440:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1366:
1360:
1356:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1301:
1298:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1218:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1191:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1170:
1163:
1159:
1156:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1139:182.239.77.40
1131:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1093:
1090:
1086:
1085:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1033:
1030:
1029:
1026:
1009:
1005:
1001:
1000:
992:
981:
979:
976:
972:
971:
967:
954:
951:
948:
944:
925:
921:
917:
914:
913:
912:
911:
905:
902:
901:
900:
899:
893:
890:
889:
888:
887:
880:
876:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:Destub needed
866:
864:
863:
855:
852:
851:
850:
849:
842:
838:
835:
834:
833:
832:
826:
823:
822:
821:
820:
813:
809:
806:
805:
804:
802:
801:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
778:
775:
774:
772:
771:
767:
766:
762:
758:
757:
752:
748:
744:
735:
731:
730:
726:
722:
716:
713:
712:
709:
692:
688:
684:
683:
675:
664:
662:
659:
655:
654:
650:
637:
634:
631:
627:
614:
610:
606:
597:
593:
592:
588:
584:
578:
575:
574:
571:
554:
550:
546:
545:
537:
526:
524:
521:
517:
516:
512:
499:
496:
493:
489:
476:
475:
470:
466:
462:
453:
449:
448:
444:
441:(assessed as
440:
439:
429:
425:
424:
420:
416:
410:
407:
406:
403:
386:
382:
378:
377:
369:
363:
358:
356:
353:
349:
348:
344:
330:
325:
322:
319:
315:
310:
306:
300:
292:
288:
283:
282:
274:
270:
268:
262:
258:
256:
252:
251:controversial
247:
240:
239:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
173:
172:
164:
163:Verifiability
161:
159:
156:
154:
151:
150:
149:
140:
136:
134:
131:
129:
125:
122:
120:
117:
116:
110:
106:
105:Learn to edit
102:
99:
94:
93:
90:
89:
85:
79:
75:
71:
70:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
41:30 April 2024
38:
34:
30:
29:
25:
18:
17:
2147:
2143:
2120:
2112:
2106:
2088:
2077:
2075:
2051:for deletion
1966:
1945:
1942:
1837:
1782:
1761:
1755:
1735:
1723:
1705:67.70.33.184
1673:67.70.33.184
1668:
1651:
1634:
1617:
1600:
1563:
1529:
1510:
1491:
1489:
1477:
1470:
1363:
1299:
1264:Donald Trump
1262:which shows
1222:
1169:User:Sirlanz
1167:
1135:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1095:
1063:
1059:
1037:
1013:Conservatism
1004:conservatism
997:
953:Conservatism
909:
908:
897:
896:
885:
884:
868:
867:
862:Image needed
860:
859:
847:
846:
830:
829:
818:
817:
798:
797:
754:
746:
742:
720:
680:
608:
604:
582:
542:
536:China portal
472:
464:
460:
436:
414:
374:
305:WikiProjects
264:
248:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
147:
72:This is the
44:
40:
26:
2127:inclusion.
1866:User:Lmmnhn
1770:move review
1724:Weak oppose
1689:Off-topic.
1483:move review
1368:WP:BLPCRIME
1359:WP:BLPCRIME
1268:Moon Jae-in
1096:written in
201:free images
84:not a forum
57:its history
2212:Categories
1975:the title.
1820:Matthew hk
1605:Necrothesp
1572:Matthew hk
1546:WP:TWODABS
1219:Carrie Lam
1064:photograph
892:...orphans
877:(5,424) •
747:photograph
609:photograph
465:photograph
2191:Simonm223
2166:Simonm223
2150:article.
2129:Simonm223
2090:Simonm223
2086:finished.
2029:Simonm223
1996:Simonm223
1805:Nil Einne
1766:talk page
1542:WP:PTOPIC
1492:Not moved
1439:WP:RUMOUR
1412:Simonm223
1408:WP:RUMOUR
1372:Simonm223
1111:travelled
696:Hong Kong
687:Hong Kong
636:Hong Kong
273:citations
141:if needed
124:Be polite
74:talk page
2187:WP:SYNTH
2023:No. Add
1768:or in a
1740:MarioGom
1586:feminist
1550:feminist
1500:Feminist
922:(390) •
390:Politics
381:politics
324:Politics
271:Include
109:get help
82:This is
80:article.
33:deletion
2072:deleted
1635:Support
1564:Comment
1190:sirlanz
1155:sirlanz
1107:realise
1040:on the
926:(1,324)
881:(6,732)
856:(1,026)
839:(60) •
782:history
723:on the
585:on the
417:on the
295:C-class
255:dispute
207:WP refs
195:scholar
2179:ProKMT
2152:ProKMT
2125:WP:DUE
2115:page.
2109:ProKMT
2011:ProKMT
1977:ProKMT
1899:Lmmnhn
1669:Oppose
1656:Kdm852
1652:Oppose
1618:Oppose
1601:Oppose
1540:– Per
1519:(talk)
1444:Kdm852
1390:Kdm852
1365:Lmmnhn
1320:Lmmnhn
1287:Kdm852
1285:not.--
1272:Lmmnhn
1242:Kdm852
1203:Lmmnhn
1174:Lmmnhn
1103:colour
865:(348)
810:(4) •
301:scale.
179:Google
49:merged
2183:WP:OR
2025:WP:RS
1992:WP:OR
1895:HKFTU
1791:(see
1728:JSTOR
1388:all.
1198:camp"
1068:added
1060:image
843:(290)
803:(60)
792:purge
787:watch
751:added
743:image
613:added
605:image
558:China
549:China
498:China
469:added
461:image
222:JSTOR
183:books
137:Seek
51:into
45:merge
2195:talk
2185:and
2170:talk
2156:talk
2133:talk
2094:talk
2033:talk
2015:talk
2000:talk
1981:talk
1973:move
1952:talk
1927:talk
1903:talk
1878:talk
1851:talk
1840:CGTN
1824:talk
1809:talk
1744:talk
1736:weak
1709:talk
1695:talk
1691:STSC
1677:talk
1660:talk
1643:talk
1639:STSC
1626:talk
1609:talk
1590:talk
1576:talk
1554:talk
1544:and
1514:SITH
1502:).
1448:talk
1416:talk
1394:talk
1376:talk
1339:talk
1335:STSC
1324:talk
1309:talk
1305:STSC
1291:talk
1276:talk
1266:and
1258:and
1254:See
1246:talk
1230:talk
1226:STSC
1207:talk
1178:talk
1143:talk
814:(23)
777:edit
215:FENS
189:news
126:and
61:here
1066:be
1062:or
1032:Mid
749:be
745:or
715:Top
611:be
607:or
577:Mid
467:be
463:or
409:Low
229:TWL
35:.
2214::
2197:)
2172:)
2158:)
2135:)
2096:)
2074:.
2035:)
2027:.
2017:)
2002:)
1994:.
1983:)
1954:)
1946:--
1929:)
1923:UU
1905:)
1880:)
1874:UU
1853:)
1826:)
1811:)
1760:.
1746:)
1730:,
1711:)
1697:)
1679:)
1662:)
1645:)
1628:)
1611:)
1592:)
1578:)
1556:)
1548:.
1534:→
1475:.
1450:)
1418:)
1410:.
1396:)
1378:)
1341:)
1326:)
1311:)
1293:)
1278:)
1248:)
1232:)
1209:)
1180:)
1145:)
1109:,
1105:,
918:•
445:).
327::
209:)
107:;
2193:(
2168:(
2154:(
2131:(
2092:(
2031:(
2013:(
1998:(
1979:(
1950:(
1925:(
1901:(
1876:(
1849:(
1822:(
1807:(
1799:(
1742:(
1707:(
1693:(
1675:(
1658:(
1641:(
1624:(
1607:(
1588:(
1574:(
1552:(
1508:)
1504:(
1446:(
1414:(
1392:(
1374:(
1337:(
1322:(
1307:(
1289:(
1274:(
1244:(
1228:(
1205:(
1176:(
1141:(
1125:.
1044:.
727:.
693:.
589:.
421:.
307::
269:.
257:.
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
111:.
63:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.