Talk:Progressivism - Knowledge (XXG)

1636:"Finally, liberals are more likely to support the Democratic Party in America and a Labour party or Liberal Party in Europe and Australia, while progressives tend to feel disillusioned with any two-party system, and vote more often for third-party candidates". This seems confusing. Very few European countries have a Liberal Party as one of their big two, so the natural interpretation of the sentence is to look at Australia, where the Liberal Party is a rightwing conservative party despite its name. Besides, relatively few European countries have a two-party system, unless you mean two-party in the weak sense of two-party-dominant. In Germany for example, the third-party and fourth-party scene is about a million times more vibrant than the third-party scene in the USA. And only a small minority of Europe's mainstream social democratic parties are called Labour. 3287:

the rest of the article, which is strongly biased in the other direction, conflating political progressivism with the general notion of progress, talking about it in glowing terms ("demonstrating that societies could progress in civility from barbaric conditions to civilization through strengthening the basis of empirical knowledge as the foundation of society" … "nobility of Western civilization, worth of economic/technological growth, faith in reason and scientific/scholarly knowledge obtained through reason, intrinsic importance and worth of life on earth" etc.) It's not a well-balanced article, but almost entirely paints

4340:

therefore irrelevant. More relevant is that readers will NOT get a clear understanding of the topic by reading this article. Nowhere in the article are the core tenets of progressivism actually outlined or even hinted at (except in the egregiously misrepresentative lead); instead, the article just lists what people identifying as progressives happened to support throughout history. That obviously isn't sufficient to form a "clear" understanding of the topic, much less when progressives have supported positions as disparate as pro-eugenics and anti-social Darwinism.

2520:

reprimanded for NPOV left-wing political activism on WP. 2) TFD is ONLY cherry-picking three individuals on this list that he for some reason does not want to be publicly listed as being progressive, perhaps because in the USA 'progressive' has started taking on an increasingly negative public opinion in the past couple years. That's the only reason I can think of. My point here is why is TFD not removing ALL members from this list, since NONE are sourced, and only targeting these three, when the others on the list do not meet the requirements for the same policy?

1660:

to be the left end of the entire spectrum of discourse with voices like Chomsky and so forth being side show attractions. Presumably, this, the near total lack of a politically effective left is one of those contradictions in American politics overripe for resolution. So the distinction between "liberal" and "progressive" is overdetermined here, "liberal" doesn't mean what it does globally, and in as much as it's a central pillar of the "centre right nation" cant doesn't mean progressive at all.

848: 821: 290: 344: 323: 2133:

removal was done as a specific target against me, not against the content. When an editor selectively picks three additions I made a year ago to remove on the basis of not being cited, but leaves the rest of the names there also without citation, it is clearly a target against my additions, even though mine carried the same (and MORE) rationale for being added. As I was clearly being personally targeted, I have strong arguments to consider that a vandalism of my edits.--

1373:"Progressive" is simply a political ideology of advocating for social reform through government action. Aside from the use of loaded words throughout the article, every socio-political ideology is "progressive" in the way it is now described in this article. The problem with calling it "left statism" is that "statism" is a Libertarian term for those opposite to Libertarian ideology, but it is still the opposite of Libertarianism, particularly "right Libertarianism". 531: 951: 2400:

themselves as progressives borders on the absurd. Any attempt to post those citations will no doubt result in TFD starting a month-long war deleting citations as well. We need a non-partisan experienced editor to put a stop to TFD's ongoing blockade of subjects that appear to be damaging to his political ideology. he also needs a stern warning regarding targeting specific editors, instead of content. This incident proves this accusation. --

793: 858: 3415:

within Knowledge (XXG). The problem with a politically charged topic like this is that published articles describing progressivism will define it differently depending on the political viewpoint of the writer, they will inevitably conflict with one another, and there will be a struggle to exclude "facts" that are based on references from "biased" authors—i.e., authors whose politics differ from those of the editor doing the bowdlerizing. -

1123: 594: 455: 428: 2818:

the changes they approved of as anything but reform. And then it contradicts itself with its talk about conservative and reactionary, because reactionaries, by definition, and conservatives, in reality, want changes, and being human regard them as reform. Without some explanation about what kind of changes, it's not neutral. ("Positive changes" or other such euphemisms also don't cut it. No one wants negative change.)

1063: 465: 3597:, we read: "Prominent progressive conservative elements in the British Conservative Party have criticized neoliberalism". I think the sentence requires clarification in regards to the "progressive conservative" phrase, which seems like an oxymoron. Does it refer to members of the Conservative Party holding progressive views, to members of a discrete movement titled "progressive-conservative", or something else? -- 2706:

WELL-KNOWN and DEEPLY DOCUMENTED progressives is beyond absurd. So absurd, that any further removal of my PROPERLY CITED additions will lead me no choice but to file yet another NPOV complaint to add to your resume of using WP as a leftist propaganda platform. I halfway expect TFD to now start advocating for removing ALL names, since the only cited ones are the ones he is desperate to hide from public view.--

991: 584: 563: 354: 2849:

type of "ism". I agree with Morbius, above, that the argument for non-neutrality contains no context which is in any way descriptive or could be properly written about, short of some completely new research. So unless there is/are some other POV issues, or unless a proper context can be summoned to remove any POV from that opening sentence -- I'll be removing the neutrality tag in about a month.

3046: 3309:

is just original research. The original progressive position incidentally was not that government impose solutions based on modern principles, but that governments should be run according to modern principles. So while progressives brought in prohibition and food inspection, they also gave the vote to women and introduced referenda as a method of changing laws, and re-call elections.

3824:"It was Fortuyn who blazed the trail for the new generation of far-right leaders across Europe. He may not have intended to be a pioneer, but his brand of plain-spoken political incorrectness and his depiction of Islamic culture as a “backwards” and reactionary threat to the hard-won progressive values of western Europe would provide a potent template for a modernised far right." - 1505: 281: 223: 251: 695: 668: 3102: 705: 2670:"I am somebody who is no doubt progressive. I believe in a tax code that we need to make more fair. I believe in universal health care. I believe in making college affordable. I believe in paying our teachers more money. I believe in early childhood education. I believe in a whole lot of things that make me progressive." 3328:

progresssivism in the article. A lot of the other content that Embram mentions is showing what progressives have used as justifications for their policies - it does not mean that those points are conveying truths; such is a valuable inclusion regardless of whether one believes in those justifications of not.--

3544:

influenced progressivism as in a general philosophy or the contemporary political usage of the term progressivism, they are acceptable. Otherwise just listing various insignificant individuals and movements who associated in some manner with the word "progressive" in them is a total waste of space and time.

1895:. That was vandalism and I have reverted it. "One can argue" almost anything but this is not the place for original research, personal opinions or analysis. Neutrality is what we do. If you want to argue politics then please find a web forum where that sort of discussion is appropriate and do it there. -- 2940:

By what measure is it "gradual"; in relation to what? The article states it's left-wing, so is it gradual in comparison with a socialist revolution or social liberalism? And the term "reform" used in this context is a sweet nothing: reform is the rule of politics, what party in which country promises

2002:

Twice in the past year, an editor mysteriously removed three names from the list of Progressive who have served in the the U.S. Congress: Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama. All three are well-known progressives: Waters is a current member of the Progressive Caucus, Clinton and Obama

1749:

The "Idea of progress" (That technological advancement improves society) is completely unrelated to Progressivism (The theory that 'progressive' (meaning Incremental) change through government intervention is the best way to change society.) - This is a complete malapropism. The history section needs

1659:

The basis for this no longer appears to be in the article but what is there now, identifying American Liberalism with "left conservatism" is pretty near the mark. "Liberal" in the universe of mainstream US political discourse equivocally refers to that and what from the in-universe view is considered

1253:

Have been threatened? Are you in fear of your life? Do you fear detention without trial? Has anybody murdered any of your friends who have held similar opinions? Has anybody prevented you from taking your opinions to some blog or webforum where they are actually welcome and appropriate, as opposed to

3876:

Since this article is more about how the term progressive has been applied then about any specific ideological group, that level of information would be out of place. The answer to your question would depend on whether "progressive" means the left of the Democratic Party, the whole Democratic Party

3612:

I think the entire section should go. Cameron btw has described himself as a progressive conservative. It is not actually an oxymoron, some conservatives see progress as necessary in order to maintain tradition. So same sex marriage for example is defended as preserving the family. But few would

3464:

An ad hominem remark is an attack on a person. There was no person involved, so there was no ad hominem, no attack or criticism of or against any particular person. I was expressing a concern about what might happen (something to watch out for) in any hypothetical future page involving a politically

3286:

That statement might be improved, however it's not in the general introduction, but only in the portion of the introduction that concerns political progressivism, which is certainly about using the power of government to solve societal problems. Furthermore, there is nothing remotely "neutral" about

3232:

What on Earth are you talking about? The term "Progressive Era" was in use by the early 1900s, and became standard political shorthand by 1930 or so. And the Progressives very explicitly identified themselves as a movement, even using the term to name their political parties (or factions of existing

2848:

The opening sentence works and does not appear to have any neutrality issues. You can't read that opening phrase without taking into context the end of that same phrase, as well as the second sentence. This looks to me to properly provide the context for differentiating Progressivism from some other

2817:

The opening sentence is not neutral because it would in reality cover every single idelogy that ever existed -- "political ideology advocating or favoring social, political, and economic reform or changes" -- as if there were ever an ideology that liked things exactly the way they were, or regarded

2266:

July 22 - again reverted political-agenda removal of progressives Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Either the entire list goes away, or the entire list stays. Political ideologs removing people they don't want seen in this list is considered vandalism. They admit they are progressives, so they are

2219:

July 21, 2011: yet another political ideolog has without explanation again singled out progressives Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for removal frfom this list. This is a political game being played on WP in an attempt to hide these two leading *self-admitted* progressives from being included in

1680:

The section on Progressivism in Ireland shows the Progressive Democrats as being Progressive, eventhough they are not Progressive, just because their name says Progressive dosnt make it true, we could also make the same argument about the Progressive Conservatives of Canada, they are not Progressive

1474:

FWIW, Red Tories tend to be Progressives from Ontario or the East, while Progressives come from a rather different set of traditions and tend to be from the Prairies. There are individual exceptions: this Prairie nationalist Orchard tends, ahistorcally, to be called a Red Tory. Margaret Thatcher's

1428:

experts refer to themselves as libertarians but are really in many cases anarchists, reactionaries, fascists or just ignorant thugs, to give just four illustrative examples. Some of them are even libertarians, but this does not bode well for their objectivity nor their competence in working out the

1402:

Understand this: 'Progressive' simply means to 'progress' to John Lennon's "Imagine" Utopia (imagine no nations) as glamorized in the Closing Ceremony of the London 2012 Olympics. Note this: When the ruinous welfare state became unpopular, Progressives started to call themselves 'Liberals'; and when

1357:

The comparison section is confusing because the terms progressive, liberal, conservative and socialist are used ambiguously. However I cannot see how your use of the term progressive fits in with any of its uses in the article. Basically the article lists how the term has been used in reference to

1264:

So Forbes published an opinion piece that you agreed with back in 2014, did they? Good for you. The trouble is that we can't reference factual claims to people's opinions. The difference is that Forbes is a magazine and Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopaedia. They have their standards and we have ours.

4332:

They didn't reform or dismantle any norms that already existed in *German* society. Those whom the Nazis targeted were either culturally distinct from Germans (Jews, Roma) or violated/challenged existing social norms (socialists, LGBT). You could certainly argue that the Nazis violated many ethical

3687:

This movement was not a liberal vs. conservative thing in the U.S. (and in Europe). There were parts of that which laster formed the core of the modern liberal philosophy and parts that formed part of the modern conservative philosophy. But at the time these were all seen as part of one big push to

3633:

A long anti-racist section, complete with loads of sources (#21-24) arguing against race as an adequate classification (yes, in an article on progressivism), yet sources with a complete lack of anything associating these views with progressivism, which as this article explains, means the desire for

3450:

as being an appropriate state of affairs. Two wrongs don't make a right, if you believe the content in the article is biased towards progressivism that does not justify inserting a reverse-bias statement. What it does warrant is a thorough re-write of the article if others agree that is necessary.--

3449:

last remark that was completely unnecessary. The contrast of the term "government imposition" versus "individual actions and choices" is very biased, it is a libertarian adage that says that progressives are authoritarian and contrasts that with a market economy with minimal government intervention

3308:

The problem is that the article conflates four distinct historical political positions that called themselves progressive (1900-1914, 1924, 1948 and today.) The connections between the four are slight and any description of their common "ideology" (in fact progressivism has never been an ideology)

2690:

You are just Google-mining for sources to support your views. H. Clinton and Obama were never members of the Progressive Caucus, and you would need sources that describe them that way. Waters of course is a progressive, notice that she is highly critical of Obama, but does not have the stature of

2132:

Where did I ever say Clinton and Obama were part of the progressive caucus? I never stated that. I provided non-refutable citations by them IN THEIR OWN WORDS describing themselves as progressives. The first removal several months ago was done without explaination, and thus I reverted. The second

2035:

3) Barack Obama at a 2008 town hall meeting near Atlanta during the Presidential campaign: "I am somebody who is no doubt progressive. I believe in a tax code that we need to make more fair. I believe in universal health care. I believe in making college affordable. I believe in paying our teachers

3414:

progressivism will be written with a partisan point of view, argued over, and eventually controlled and maintained in an ideologically pure manner by a group of senior editors with a particular political viewpoint, perhaps similar to the way the pages concerning climate change have been controlled

2964:

Changed the last sentence to describe Blue Dog Democrats not as conservative, but as moderates. Too often Knowledge (XXG) demonstrates a sort of Moral Relativism, where everything easily relates to everything else or all things meld into one. If a Blue Dog is a Democrat, by definition, they should

1950:

hmmm what i mean is can a party be described as progressive if it is changing its own political perspective or is considered to be progressive by introducing new ideas. Or is progressiveness linked into the idea of social equity, individual freedom, social democracy, free markets. (Any of these

1420:

A problematic argument. The original Progressives weren't focused (entirely) on social reform through government action. In fact, many of them were classical liberals who advocated direct social engagement at the grass roots level. Bottom line? Government was simply one avenue to social, economic,

3397:

in a positive light (with some limited critical provisos thrown in by other editors), rather than a scholarly article. There are not only several different political "progressive" parties in the world, fighting for similar but not identical purposes, there are also different contexts in which the

2833:

That's not true. In the US, conservatives don't want real reform. They want things to stay the same or to return to a previous state. They might want to reform corrupt institutions but that's not what we're talking about here. Besides what you're claiming makes no sense anyway. A neutral sentence

2191:

Why are we listing members of Congress at all? The most famous progressives in U.S. history have come from various branches of government, including the presidency, state governors, senators, etc. By no stretch is Al Franken one of the most notable progressives in the U.S., for example. I suggest

1311:

Reading through discussion points, it's clear the term "progressive" needs a better heuristic for readers. The section comparing progressivism to liberalism, conservativism, and socialism provides a poor typological structure for conveying meaning. Now, I would need to read more about the early

4333:

norms (although even that is questionable given the atrocious precedent that the communists had set), but Hitler clearly explains that these unethical decisions were a means to end; it's highly doubtful that the Nazis viewed unethical norms as inherently and universally improving human societies.

4124:

The term should be simply described as a term for several political ideologies that were described that way to sound nice in the first paragraph. No idea how to make this statement sophisticated tn, but the current definition is horrible, jumping from one meaning to the other without any form of

3327:

The contrast in that statement of associating progressive stances as government imposition as opposed to leaving the economy alone to the free market and individual choices and actions, is a libertarian/laissez-faire outlook on progressive politics, which is fine to be included as a criticism of

2399:

After researching TFD's long history of standing guard on his favorite political pages, ensuring that his thinly-veiled leftist ideology gets bullied through, this incident is starting to make more sense. To claim that Hillary Clinton and Obama are not progressives, when they both self-identify

1450:

I removed this wording: "...although the PCs also contained a progressive wing for the rest of its history. Most of these people were opposed to the PCs merger with the more socially conservative Canadian Alliance in 2003." Progressives who joined or re-joined the Conservatives did not form a

1315:

This heuristic comes from Stiles (2006) who did an analysis of current environmental education policies/philosophies in the United States. Stiles supports his framework with a number of sources, and it makes a lot more sense with cited sources above and in the main article. The heuristic is as

2313:

you are ONLY targeting my additions. As I have said numerous times. only one other in the list is sourced, yet you do not remove them. Following links to Waters/Pelosi's WP pages discusses their involvement in the Progressive caucus. ***Further deletion of my valid additions WILL be treated as

3653:

This article seems to conflate a lot of things into one article. Granted, all of these things did cross paths at some point but I tend to think that perhaps some of these different topics should be split into different articles with this one just providing a short unifying basis to explain how

4292:

This would have nothing to do with the reforms the Nazis purportedly introduced. By the logic of your proposed lead sentence, the Nazis would still be labeled as progressive, so your proposal doesn't solve the underlying problem. The Nazis violently attempted to reform or dismantle social and

4339:

Frankly, it isn't that complicated. Fundamentally, there isn't much more to progressivism than a belief that the abandonment of certain social norms in exchange for increased social liberty or equality can be beneficial for society. But this ─ unlike my proposed change ─ is indeed WP:OR, and

3573:

The article does not, and should make clear, preferably near the start, that the term "Progressive" is solely an autonym that is not used or accepted by those unfavourable to the philosophy. The name is not a proper noun. It coopts a common noun with pre-existing positive, complimentary and

3543:

It is improved. However the examples in specific countries material is a waste of space and time. To be inclusive we would have to have progressive parties from every country in the world listed, and that is unreasonable. Where examples of people and movements in countries have substantially

2519:

TFD AGAIN reverted my additions, but did not remove other unsourced additions. This is my point. I have a document with notes of all of the relevant citations needed from actual transcripts, etc for inclusion in this WP section, but I am trying to prove a point. 1) TFD has a history of being

3715:

There doesn't appear to be a linked definition to how progressivism is defined. See the "" below, there is no link for "progressivism": Progressivism is the support for or advocacy for improvement of society by reform. As a philosophy, it is based on the idea of progress, which asserts that

2705:

Google mining people quoting in their exact words??? Obama says " I am no doubt a progressive", but TFD is saying that Obama was incorrect about describing himself? TFD, I am not sure what ideology or people you are trying to protect here, but your fixation on trying to protect these three

3266:

This statement above is currently in the intro, it is very biased using word usage to denigrate the topic, claiming that progressives want government to "impose solutions", mocking progressives claim to using modern principles by an inappropriate sarcastic usage of quotation marks that are

1795:

The recurrent insertion of material asserting that Progressivism is a form of insanity, especially in the head section, render the page unusable as a reference. I'm not familiar with the details of Wiki conventions, but such things often seem to find a home under a "controversy" section.

3209:

This whole idea of a "Progressive Era" and some cohesive "Progressivism movement" is really new. Some references should be added to confirm when the label "progressive" began to be applied in this manner. Otherwise, Knowledge (XXG) is just making stuff up like other publications.

4176:

As the article points out, the term was used to refer to four distinct movements. While each was created by members of the previous one, it was not one movement. It's only in the third version that racial equality became a key issue. Before that, there was a range of views on race.

1421:

and political reform. The emphasis being - in all cases - on reform and a transformation of conservative (past) ways of doing things. Additionally, this discussion ignores the scientific and empirical roots that the original Progressive movement held. 12:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

2192:

dropping the list completely. We have a whole article on the topic where readers can get details of notable progressives from across the history of progressivism. None of the other national sections list current progressive politicians in the lower houses of their legislatures.

4288:

which describe progressivism as attempting to dismantle cultural norms, and these sources indicate that this is the single most important aspect of progressivism so that it belongs in the first sentence, let's see them. From that, we can modify the body of the article to explain

1179:

Look at how nuanced, lengthy and elaborate the article on "classical liberalism" is, for comparison. Modern progressivism is at least as sizeable a movement as "classical liberalism" ever was, and yet we have this lackluster and uninformatively dull article. Please fix.

4160:

I find the broad use of "progressive" to be so broad and imprecise that it is unhelpful. Be that as it may, Woodrow Wilson is listed as an example of a progressive. Should his racist actions be mentioned? Cancel culturists may want him removed from this, but we are all

2983:

The passage did not call them "conservative" but "more conservative Democrats". Changing that to "more moderate Democrats" is injecting bias and I will revert. Democrats btw are not by definition not conservatives, since they do not enforce ideological consistency.

3261:"Progressivism as a political philosophy holds that societal problems can best be addressed by having government impose solutions according to "modern" principles, rather than leaving the economy and society up to the free market and individual actions and choices" 3899:

article is longer than the progressivism article. Why not expand the scope of the progressivism article so it is a more useful article. Progressives still exist just as liberals still exist. So naturally many people will want a more informative progressivism

2380:

I removed new edits that were clearly against policy. The fact that there may be problems with this and other articles is no justification to add unsourced text. Clinton and Obama were never progressive's. Clinton's husband was in fact associated with the

2106:. While Waters is a progressive, she is neither a senator nor a committee chairman, and if you want to list her, then you would have to list the 100 or so other people who have been in the caucus. In fact a list can be found in the appropriate article. 294: 1606:

article puts it well: "Statism (or etatism) is a scholarly term in political philosophy either emphasising the role of the state in analysing political change; or, in describing political movements which support the use of the state to achieve

3657:

One interesting thing that this does not touch on very well: During the latter 19th and early 20th centuries the "Progressive movement" (at least a big part of it) was focused on the idea of a return to basic Christian values, advocating for

4193:

The progressive standard 100 years ago cannot be the same as the current progressive standard. He would certainly be a far-right ultra-conservative in his current character, but he was progressive in many other social issues in his time.

3267:

unnecessary as they are not quoting anything. And lastly it invokes a libertarian or laissez-faire POV saying that this is contrasted instead of "leaving the economy and society up to the free market and individual actions and choices".

2665: 3270:

This statement is not neutral, is biased against the topic in the article, and other parts of the intro describe the nature of the topic already without such bias and lack of neutrality. I request that the statement be removed on these

1451:

separate wing and were not "progressive" in a modern sense. Also I added "former" (and capitalized the reference) to "progressives" who supported the Progressive Conservative Party, because the Progressive Party had ceased to exist.

4052:. This describes a vast number of movements that are not at all Progressivism. The reforms must be those reforms supported by Progressivism to qualify, and to avoid circularity, they need to be specified more clearly than that. 2414:

We cannot determine on our own who is progressive or thinly veiled leftist or whatever categories - we need reliable sources. If you do not like that then please get the policy changed rather than argue across numerous articles.

4393: 1702:

Good point. I removed them. They and the Progressive Conservatives are already mentioned in the lead as parties use progressive in their names, although not belonging to that tradition. (The Irish party is actually liberal.)

1215:

Why they allow a section called 'Authoritarian conservatism' relating it with nazi, while nazis really means National Socialism, nazi was in real progressives but Knowledge (XXG) deny a single sourced sentence telling the true.

4293:

cultural norms in human society based on their selective application of who counted as human. For topics as complicated as these, readers will need to read past the very first sentence to get a clear understanding of the topic.

3011:"The term "progressive" is today often used in place of "liberal." Although the two are related in some ways, they are separate and distinct political ideologies and should not be used interchangeably. In the US in particular, 2898:

Dr. Morbius, nice blinders you have there. Your crude definition of modern conservatism in the United States is laughable in how inaccurate it is. Thank you for confirming that this article has a POV that is not neutral.

3796:

But currently the article lacks context as it does not adequately address the various right-wing factions who oppose progressives. It also doesn't address the issue of the left-wing politics suffering some setbacks as of

3354:

for example was formed to fight high taxes and big government. It is progressive in the sense that it rejects (to them) old-fashioned, reactionary views that hold back progress. I do not see this article going beyond a

3291:

progressivism in the most glowing terms possible, and it's interesting that the only potentially critical statement that talks about the government power aspect (which is well-documented) is attacked as "very biased." -

2720:

Could you please avoid personal attacks and false statements about other editors in your talk page discussion and edit summaries. If Obama called himself a libertarian, would you add him to the liberarianism article?

3786:

As far as the exact strength of the major segments of the right-wing political spectrum that would be speculating. Also, I would not want to project into the future given that politics has been more volatile in recent

153: 2749:

Incoming moderators, please note the name of the list involved: "Some of the more notable progressive members of Congress have included..." This means current and FORMER, which is a detail TFD is not grasping

4383: 3662:

Making Christian values explicitly prominent. This led to Christian churches and Christian organizations gaining great power in the U.S., which had not been so much the case in the earlier days of the republic.

2797:

I think you're misunderstanding what "authoritarianism" means. Advocacy of government intervention or regulation as part of the process of liberal democracy, for example, is not what authoritarianism means.

1175:

The historical discussion is vague, lacks nuances and sources. The relevance to modern progressivism as most progressives themselves understand it is marginal. Experts or academics out there: Please fix.

4473: 3130:

WIKIPEDIA - Y U NO have article on anti-progressivism? Many have openly opposed progressivist policies and even called themselves "anti-progressive" in history. For example, opponents of the New Deal. --

1312:

progressive movement, but most of the cited sources above fit within a framework that views progressivism as an ORIENTATION to the foundational political philosophies of liberalism and communitarianism.

4125:

disclaimer for the reader, making it a mangled mess only existing to support the current usage of the term. There should be more emphasis on the term history than it's meaning considering it's usage. --

2666:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/us/politics/09campaign.html?_r=1&ei=5087&em=&en=b690d55617d9d0db&ex=1215748800&adxnnl=1&oref=login&adxnnlx=1215785058-T9CQHCNICPqGNIpAArg6lA

4398: 3684:

These were all things that were to varying degrees common during much of the Middle Ages and during the Protestant Reformation (e.g. we forget that the Catholic Church used to oppose money lending).

1424:

Uh, progress on getting these political terms straight is not going to be easy until American rightists get over their anti-Obama hysteria, if then. Cladistics is not easy when many of the loudest

1358:

different political groups: parties called "progressive", American politics in the Progressive, New Deal and Great Society era, and modern liberalism. The article itself needs to be re-written.

1932:

It is perfectly possible. One side might wish to progress to the left and one to the right. This is probably true of many countries where there are no truly conservative or reactionary parties. --

4478: 4215: 3190: 2941:

to maintain the broad status quo? This sentence places the reader in no stead to understand the philosophy, and the rest of the article is thereafter a concatenation of a very broad spectrum. --

1223: 1915:

the section implies that both sides of the political spectrum are progressive is this possible or is it a contradiction where neither is progressive and they are merely opposing points of veiw.

1465:

I'm not sure where this Four Deuces guy is coming from, but I did see the front half of a horse wandering down the street a few minutes ago. Call me, Deuces, and I'll point out where it went.

3665:

Eliminating consumption of drugs and alcohol (contrary to popular belief the first drug epidemic started in the 19th century, not the 20th century). This all culminated in the Prohibition Era.

4259:

Okay, I guess we'll just leave a verifiably false lead, then (since e.g. the Nazis also introduced a lot of political reforms, yet I don't think anyone would argue that they are progressive).

2628:"I prefer the word "progressive," which has a real American meaning, going back to the progressive era at the ::::::: beginning of the 20th century. I consider myself a modern progressive..." 2003:

both describe themselves as a progressives and both served in Congress. None of the other names in the list were cited, so why are these three well-known progressives being being removed? --

4493: 4468: 888: 3406:

are used, not only throughout history but also in the present day, and this article fairly well mixes up and conflates them all. I agree the best thing would be to turn this page into a

4513: 3483:

That means that many facts such as the universe having been created 6,000 years ago are treated as fringe. But that is based on policy which is where you should take your criticisms.

1403:

Liberalism/Liberals likewise became unpopular, Liberal-Progressives like Hillary Rodham Clinton reverted back to 'Progressive' instead of 'Liberal'. They are the same. Hope this helps,

2879:

Also these claim are baseless, so please support them by concrete examples and data. As far as I can tell, progressivism advances science in accordance to a political agenda, so it is

2036:

more money. I believe in early childhood education. I believe in a whole lot of things that make me progressive." I'll even pick a far-left progressive site to cite this admission:

800: 678: 1681:

even though their name says so, I think we should remove the Ireland section from this page considering that the party is not even close to being Progressive, they are Conservative.

4533: 4528: 4503: 1186:

References to advocacy of collective action, environmental protections, workers rights, government regulation and other aspects of modern progressivism are not present here either.

965: 3744:

or is conservatives? Does the alt-right has the greater degree of intensity against progressives, but do conservatives have the greater numbers of people against progressives?

905: 4508: 1254:

spamming them over an encyclopaedia? No. None of these things. All that has happened is that you have been told to stop disrupting Knowledge (XXG) by inserting your opinions.

1210:

One complained that was my opinion then I gave the reference below then I was censored with no explanation and with a threat like I would be in any totalitarian environment.

1876:

Advocating changes and/or reform is a pretty neutral description. One could argue Hitler was progressive because he proposed (and carried out) sweeping changes in Germany.--

540: 438: 726:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the

4428: 545: 1561:

The first sentence of the first paragraph is a blatant violation of wikipedia neutrality. Probably also a case of original research (ie. fantasy) since it is unsourced.

3465:

charged topic like political progressivism. I'd expect the same potential problem in a page about liberalism or conservatism or libertarianism or most any other -ism. -

941: 147: 3963:

Two of the sources in the article seem to come from known opinionated outlets and the content in the article seeks to describe Progressivism in a non-neutral fashion.

3410:

page, and then the individual different pages directed to respectively specific meanings of progressivism can be written. I expect, however, that any pages concerning

3194: 1227: 1183:

This article largely lacks relevance to modern progressivism. I have added a paragraph on 21st century progressivism. Please feel free to add sources and amplify.

650: 233: 2161:

The article listed notable members of CONGRESS, not the U.S. Senate. Waters has been a CONGRESS member (House) and member of the Progressive caucus since the 90's.--

1475:

comment at one of Conrad Black's dinners on Prime Minister Mulroney, an easterner, was "I'm sorry he pays so much more attention to the adjective than to the noun."

1471:

For anyone in doubt about the separateness of the wings, Google "Rob Anders." The Progressives are trying to keep him from being renominated in his Alberta riding.

4498: 265: 4488: 4433: 931: 960: 895: 831: 763: 4448: 3881:

quoted above for example refers to "the hard-won progressive values of western Europe," which basically incorporates the ground between communism and fascism.

640: 2433:. Any addition to the article will absolutely need to be sourced to a reliable source, and not just on the whim of what an editor thinks is appropriate or the 410: 79: 4329:"The Nazis violently attempted to reform or dismantle social and cultural norms in human society based on their selective application of who counted as human" 4240:

Hello. The body of the article doesn't specifically mention either cultural norms nor social norms. Likewise, it doesn't mention dismantling those norms. Per

3668:

Eliminating gambling. In the U.S. most gambling (even lotteries) was eliminated across the U.S. by WWII, leading to the rise of Las Vegas, Atlantic City, etc.

3525:

I've edited that portion to be more reflective of the cited source, and moved it within the political progressivism section. See if you like it better now. -

1612:

I think, however, the part you deleted needed to be deleted because it was inaccurate - too restrictive. The critical characteristic of progressivism is its

4523: 4378: 521: 4518: 4463: 4423: 1602:"Statism" or "statist" is often used derisively by people who oppose State intrusions upon liberty. Nevertheless, it is a good term. Knowledge (XXG)'s own 753: 900: 4453: 4408: 400: 4140:

Agreed, the lead is incoherent. See my edits of lead. I believe this is more consistent with the body of the article and addresses part of your concern.

4023: 616: 4244:

we cannot introduce new unsourced information into the very first sentence of an article in this way. Please discuss here before restoring. Thank you.

4418: 2249:

Wrong. Read the very first entry in this discussion. Both identify themselves as progressives. Why is the left desperate to change history on this? --

511: 3008:

The emphasized portion of the passage below has no citation, and runs contrary to what I know. Would someone care to look into this please? Thanks.

1616:

for social change - the political means (as opposed to voluntary social means.) That's why I added "through governmental action" to the definition.

2865:

This is true indeed, I came here to write exactly this so I support this claim. The opening sentence is not a real differentiator of progressivism.

728: 85: 4483: 4388: 1975:

It can mean anything and this article is just a list of definitions. It has been applied however to specific political moverments in the U. S.

1582:

A division into economic and social is also typical of libertarian viewpoints alone, as exemplified by their quiz, and has no academic standing.

376: 1579:

Statist is a libertarian term of derision, and that is the dominant usage people encounter. A brief google search for statism will show that.

4443: 4438: 3165:

I would respond: No. The opposite of progressive is anti-progressive. Go ask the anti-progressivists. Nobody calls themselves 'reactionary.' --

1340:

Stiles, T. (2006). Place stories: (Re)locating the interests of youth in environmental education. Dissertation at Arizona State University.

871: 826: 487: 4368: 3829: 2220:

the list. Why try to intentionally hide the two most influential progressives from a list that even includes former and dead politicians? --

44: 607: 568: 4458: 3551: 3511: 3451: 3329: 3272: 3217: 2915: 2884: 2751: 2736: 2707: 2676: 2401: 2359: 2335: 2315: 2274: 2250: 2221: 2162: 2134: 2073: 2044: 2004: 1757: 30: 2553:

Here's the sources I am ready to create, but should I even go through the trouble, as I fully expect an edit war on my citations as well?

4403: 4053: 3998: 3716:

advancements in science, technology, economic development and social organization are vital to the improvement of the human condition.

3350:

Again, progressive is a term that has been used for four distinct movements in the U.S. and for unrelated groups in other nations. The

3131: 3086: 2783: 1688: 1661: 1637: 4336:"For topics as complicated as these, readers will need to read past the very first sentence to get a clear understanding of the topic." 1515: 1211: 718: 673: 4413: 4219: 4098: 3851: 1877: 1811: 1777: 1292: 1037:

Write a history of each worldwide movement or cause self-identified as "progressive", possibly adding material to referenced articles.

883: 3750:

Which group is currently is expected to have more influence in the Democratic politics in 2018? The centrists or the progressives?

1830:, since it is self-published. Even if it were published by a reputable source, we would have to establish whether the opinions were 367: 328: 99: 3935:

It's not the same thing. Progressive is a term that can mean different things, which are better covered in their own articles, per

3701: 3635: 3145:

The opposite of progressive is reactionary. And many progressives opposed the New Deal, while many non-progressives supported it.

2799: 1540: 1374: 1192: 1553:

Article would exist better-presented with more subsections and subtopics, for increased clarity, objectivity, and ease of reading.

478: 433: 104: 20: 2355: 879:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

2965:

not be considered a conservative. You've got to draw a line in the sand somewhere. And typically, that is the deflection point.

2930:

As much as I abhor involving myself within the debate of semantics and duckspeak of politics, this article is undoubtingly bias.

2334:

Please provide an explanation why you left the other unsourced names on the list, and only targeted my additions for removal. --

74: 4373: 3979: 3076: 3479:

Content policy means that good articles should read like articles in standard textbooks or analyses in newspapers such as the

2385:. Pelosi quit the Progressives when she became speaker. But it is not up to other editors to investigate unsourced claims. 303: 2776:

Progressivism is 'authoritarianism for social and economic equality' would be the best definition that just saying statist.

3510:

There has been little substantive improvement in a month on the issues at hand that I regard as still open and unresolved.--

168: 65: 3634:

rapid progress and change. Which has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not race should be a scientific distinction.

1408: 1285:

Somebody appears to have plugged a reference to the Greens in there for no apparent reason. Relevance of this? 18/01/13

135: 3674:

Eliminating exploitive employment practices. The pro-union environment of the early 1900s being the most obvious example.

1804:

appears to refer to the work of Docjp, who put it here. I do not think this can be considered an authoritative source.

3389:. The main article in its current form seems largely a "rah-rah" page designed by the original author to cast the words 1723: 1719: 1585:

The introduction ought to be based on statements of progressivism by progressives. Not framed in libertarian ideology.

1143: 1140: 194: 190: 4241: 1104: 229: 2935:

Progressivism is a general political philosophy advocating or favoring gradual social, political, and economic reform.

1482: 1436: 1100: 2296:

should be sourced. since your additions are unsourced, I will remove them. Please do not restore without sources.

4322:

Yeah, I don't have enough time to scour paper after paper just to convince you to correct an obvious falsehood, but

3680:

Restoring cultural/racial norms. This led to the very strict segregation and rise of the new KKK in the early 1900s.

2883:

readers to think progressivism advances the human kind for beneficial purposes. Otherwise, please base your claims.

1257:

I put it to you that you have no idea what totalitarianism actually means otherwise I trust that you would have the

3737:

From the article, I don't get a sense of who is the bigger opponent of progressivism in US and European politics.

185: 3052: 109: 4182: 4106: 3944: 3886: 3618: 3488: 3364: 3314: 3150: 2989: 2726: 2696: 2624: 2486: 2420: 2390: 2301: 2240: 2111: 1980: 1847: 1708: 1456: 1393: 1363: 1152: 203: 4027: 3753:

Could some of these issues be incorporated into the article by someone more familiar with progressive politics?

3671:

Eliminating the scope and influence of big business. The anti-trust laws were the most obvious example of this.

3555: 3515: 3455: 3333: 3276: 2919: 2755: 2740: 2711: 2680: 2405: 2363: 2339: 2319: 2278: 2254: 2225: 2166: 2138: 2077: 2048: 2008: 1862: 1404: 129: 3769: 3579: 3221: 2888: 1761: 309: 260: 3135: 1641: 4057: 3677:

Elimination of exploitive lending practices. Anti-usury laws were strengthened and more thoroughly enforced.

3351: 3090: 2787: 2643: 1815: 1692: 1665: 3913:

article has a section entitled "Criticism and support". Why not do the same for the progressivism article?

3697: 3639: 3547: 3213: 3186: 2914:

Added a context sentence, removed tags as they were both about the lede and not actively under discussion.

2779: 2270: 2043:

Now why are these three additions continually removed by editors, without it being considered vandalism? --

1807: 1753: 1684: 1647: 1378: 1288: 1219: 995: 4199: 3939:. Liberalism for example can be called a progressive ideology. And criticism sections are discouraged. 1881: 1781: 1478: 1432: 1296: 125: 1858: 1347: 1108: 55: 4166: 3705: 2839: 2803: 2199: 1937: 1900: 1621: 1270: 1196: 615:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

486:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

375:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3936: 3407: 3356: 70: 4178: 4130: 4126: 4102: 3940: 3882: 3614: 3484: 3386: 3360: 3310: 3244: 3146: 2985: 2904: 2823: 2722: 2692: 2482: 2416: 2386: 2297: 2236: 2107: 1976: 1843: 1733: 1704: 1452: 1389: 1359: 863: 175: 3719: 2030: 1857:

You've got to be kidding me to even be taking this repetitious act of flagrant vandalism seriously.

1343: 1212:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphbenko/2014/01/13/are-todays-progressives-actually-totalitarians/2/

280: 222: 4141: 3975: 3723: 3575: 3170: 950: 599: 161: 2095: 1831: 1326:

conservative / communitarinism (e.g. communism, social conservative movement in the united states)

1099:

is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other

4313: 4249: 4145: 3777: 3124: 2970: 2854: 2063: 1961: 1922: 1588: 1158: 208: 2442: 2434: 1892: 1189:

Also -- re the oddly grammared entry below: Nazis were not progressives. They were fascists.

847: 820: 2058:

This raises the point that the inclusion of any person on this list needs to be well sourced.

4345: 4264: 4195: 4085: 3918: 3863: 3758: 3688:

make the world a better place (not that every Progressive was in total agreement, of course).

3602: 3027: 710: 343: 322: 51: 1835: 4162: 3530: 3470: 3420: 3297: 3113: 2835: 2194: 1933: 1896: 1617: 1592: 1266: 1154: 1122: 205: 3613:

describe Cameron as a progressive, but rather as more progressive than the party's Right.

2478: 2430: 2293: 1839: 530: 141: 4301: 4076: 4068: 3238: 3014: 2946: 2900: 2819: 2446: 1727: 1075: 1071: 470: 4305: 4285: 4024:"Refusing To Believe Early Progressives Loved Eugenics Will Not Erase The Horrible Truth" 3877:

or the Democratic Party and Republicans who are not right-wing or left-wing extremists.

2289: 2099: 1827: 3964: 3166: 359: 4278: 4097:

I agree. The term progressivism is only used in American politics and is described in

2438: 1062: 792: 464: 454: 427: 4362: 4309: 4245: 3839: 3773: 3594: 2966: 2850: 2382: 2103: 2102:. Clinton and Obama were never members of the Progressive Caucus and were listed as 2072:

None of the other names in the list were sourced, yet they were not deleted. Odd...--

2059: 1957: 1918: 1750:

to be written from scratch, as it currently has absolutely no accurate information.

999: 876: 24: 4341: 4260: 4235: 4081: 3914: 3859: 3754: 3598: 3180: 3023: 1468:

The original text which he excised is precisely correct and diplomatically worded.

612: 2037: 4323: 3574:

favourable meanings. Those not espousing the philosophy do not accept or use it.

4050:

Progressivism is the support for or advocacy of improvement of society by reform

4002: 3526: 3466: 3416: 3293: 3109: 1776:

the last section debunked this , however many individuals and sources disagree.

3733:

More coverage of opposition of progressives and recent setbacks of progressives

3910: 3896: 3446: 2942: 2625:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/24/us/politics/24transcript.html?pagewanted=all

2613: 2024: 2023:

1) Clinton in her own words defining herself as a progressive (@50 seconds)

853: 723: 700: 589: 583: 562: 460: 353: 349: 3741: 3654:"Progressivism" evolved into different, frequently divergent, philosophies. 3629:"Modern progressives now tend to describe race as merely a social construct" 1800: 372: 875:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 2267:

proud of it. Why continually try to hide it by vandalizing this section?

4101:, although the term progressive is used as an antithesis of reactionary. 2644:

http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=71&sectiontree=2,71

1156: 483: 207: 2314:

vandalism. Please keep your political agendas out of Knowledge (XXG).--

250: 4304:

because of this kind of thing. That's just one reason we need to avoid

3013:

the term progressive tends to have the same value as the European term

1603: 722:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 4349: 4317: 4268: 4253: 4223: 4203: 4186: 4170: 4149: 4134: 4110: 4091: 4061: 3984: 3948: 3922: 3890: 3867: 3781: 3762: 3727: 3709: 3643: 3622: 3606: 3583: 3559: 3534: 3519: 3492: 3474: 3459: 3424: 3368: 3337: 3318: 3301: 3280: 3249: 3225: 3198: 3174: 3154: 3139: 3117: 3094: 3031: 2993: 2974: 2950: 2923: 2908: 2892: 2858: 2843: 2827: 2807: 2791: 2759: 2744: 2730: 2715: 2700: 2684: 2490: 2450: 2424: 2409: 2394: 2367: 2343: 2323: 2305: 2282: 2258: 2244: 2235:

Because they do not self-identify as or are considered progressives.

2229: 2205: 2170: 2142: 2115: 2081: 2067: 2052: 2029:

2) Maxine Waters has been in the progressive caucus since the 1990's:

2012: 1984: 1965: 1941: 1926: 1904: 1885: 1866: 1851: 1819: 1785: 1765: 1738: 1712: 1696: 1669: 1651: 1625: 1596: 1486: 1460: 1440: 1412: 1397: 1382: 1367: 1351: 1300: 1274: 1231: 1200: 4394:

Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences

3999:"Dark Side of Progressivism Exposed: From Eugenics to 'Race Science'" 3359:

page, since other than favoring progress, there is no commonality.

694: 667: 3806:

It would not be hard to incorporate this material into the article.

3747:

Who is offering the greater degree of opposition to progressives?

3073:

Please make these minor edits regarding spelling/grammar/usability.

2605:

CNN / YouTube Democratic Primary debate, Charleston SC Jul 23, 2007

1171:

Article is problematic and irrelevant to 21st century progressivism

1514:

may be in need of reorganization to comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s

1261:

not insult its real victims by trying to compare yourself to them.

1242:

Please just take a few deep breaths and then ask yourself whether

2031:

http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Congressional_Progressive_Caucus

1320:

progressive / liberalism (e.g. liberal democracy ala Rawls,1971)

3815:

For example, below are reliable sources relating to this matter:

2735:

referred for mediation. I'm not playing TFD's game any longer.--

1334:

by Stephen Mulhall and Adam Swift (1996) is a must read as well.

3852:

Rise of the nationalists: a guide to Europe’s far-right parties

3255:

Very biased statement in the intro of this article, not neutral

2876:

people into thinking other isms do not want to advance science.

4326:

mentions social reform as a defining quality of progressivism.

3040: 1498: 1322:

conservative / liberalism (e.g. libertarianism, neoliberalism)

1159: 1116: 1057: 981: 274: 245: 217: 209: 15: 4384:

Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Society and social sciences

4210:

Progressivism; ¿The final revisionist of the politic culture?

4281:, but even with sources, that conflates two separate issues. 4156:

Woodrow Wilson as progressive, but promoter of Jim Crow laws

2098:: it has a clear meaning and using it the way you are is a 949: 791: 529: 2655:

Town hall meeting in suburban Atlanta during 2008 campaign:

1572:

policies (government management) and liberal direction for

269:. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. 3595:

Progressivism#Contemporary_mainstream_political_conception

3593:

On the last sentence of the last paragraph at the section

2634:

Maxine Waters (Founding member of the Progressive Caucus)

1724:

the merger/coup (depending on your point of view) of 2003

1998:

United States section - list of Progressives in Congress

4474:

Low-importance social and political philosophy articles

1522: 1023: 1017: 1011: 1005: 3772:

better suited to anything other than an Encyclopedia.

160: 4399:

C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences

1951:

things in isolation on in junction with one another.

1206:

Progressives are so totalitarians as Knowledge (XXG)

611:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 482:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 371:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 4479:

Social and political philosophy task force articles

2354:Please remove those same names off the list on the 774: 174: 1238:(Lets turn that bold font off shall we?</b: --> 4534:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use British English 4529:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use Oxford spelling 4494:C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance 4469:C-Class social and political philosophy articles 3840:US election: Trump and the rise of the alt-right 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 4514:United States History articles with to-do lists 2933: 2834:isn't neutral because it isn't specific? What? 2038:http://www.progressive.org/mag/nichols0109.html 1324:progressive / communitarianism (e.g. socialism) 1040:Elaborate on 'Progressivism Worldwide' section. 1525:to make improvements to the overall structure. 4504:Mid-importance United States History articles 1043:Expand List of progressive advocates section. 8: 2638:Congressional Progressive Caucus membership: 1891:Please do not disrupt the article to make a 732:about philosophy content on Knowledge (XXG). 4277:To be verifiably false it would have to be 3161:The opposite of progressive is reactionary. 1722:no longer calls itself "Progressive" since 1557:Neutrality violated by libertarian framing. 4509:WikiProject United States History articles 4308:to the first sentence of these articles. 4300:argue that they were progressive. We have 3695: 3184: 2614:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2oOoCdFblc 2025:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2oOoCdFblc 1217: 815: 771: 662: 557: 422: 317: 4429:Mid-importance American politics articles 1801:http://about-psychology.com/progress.html 1541:Learn how and when to remove this message 1246:of that nonsense you said actually makes 916:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 263:by Knowledge (XXG) editors, which is now 2957:Section: 2 By country, 2.6 United States 2868:For example, the opening sentence makes 2292:. All material added, especially about 625:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Conservatism 3989: 817: 664: 559: 424: 319: 278: 4524:Knowledge (XXG) pages with to-do lists 4499:C-Class United States History articles 4379:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles 4216:2800:430:1200:B062:9D55:CD26:D49A:4918 3191:2804:14C:F421:1337:2033:9778:D173:8945 3004:Relation to other political ideologies 1224:2804:14C:F421:1337:2033:9778:D173:8945 738:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Philosophy 232:on 25 March 2010 (UTC). The result of 4489:Mid-importance United States articles 4434:American politics task force articles 4082:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1799:I would point out that the link, < 1107:, this should not be changed without 385:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology 7: 4449:Mid-importance Conservatism articles 1772:as a eupemism for general "liberals" 869:This article is within the scope of 716:This article is within the scope of 605:This article is within the scope of 496:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics 476:This article is within the scope of 365:This article is within the scope of 3589:"Progressive-conservative" oxymoron 2358:WP Page. They are also unsourced.-- 308:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 4519:WikiProject United States articles 4464:Low-importance Philosophy articles 4424:C-Class American politics articles 4099:Progressivism in the United States 1388:Thankyou, now we all understand. 919:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 4454:WikiProject Conservatism articles 4409:Mid-importance sociology articles 3179:The opposite of progressivism is 1265:That's how a free press works. -- 628:Template:WikiProject Conservatism 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 4419:Mid-importance politics articles 4075:This reads like another fork of 3100: 3044: 2356:Congressional Progressive Caucus 1503: 1121: 1061: 989: 856: 846: 819: 703: 693: 666: 592: 582: 561: 463: 453: 426: 352: 342: 321: 288: 279: 249: 221: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1632:Liberals support conservatives? 936:This article has been rated as 801:Social and political philosophy 758:This article has been rated as 741:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 645:This article has been rated as 516:This article has been rated as 405:This article has been rated as 228:This article was nominated for 4484:C-Class United States articles 4389:C-Class level-5 vital articles 4296:Unfortunately a lot of people 4171:19:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC) 3460:23:07, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 3425:17:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 3369:14:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 3338:01:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 3319:00:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC) 3302:00:06, 29 September 2014 (UTC) 3281:23:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC) 3108:. Thanks for the corrections! 388:Template:WikiProject Sociology 1: 4444:C-Class Conservatism articles 4439:WikiProject Politics articles 4135:21:42, 11 December 2018 (UTC) 3710:21:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC) 3584:13:36, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 3032:05:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 2760:07:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 2745:07:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 2731:06:35, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 2716:06:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 2701:05:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 2685:04:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 2171:23:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC) 2143:23:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC) 2116:19:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 2082:18:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 2068:18:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC) 2053:00:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC) 2013:23:29, 25 December 2010 (UTC) 1739:19:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 1670:01:55, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 1576:policies (personal choice)." 1568:or egalitarian direction for 1398:03:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC) 1383:00:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC) 958:This article is supported by 619:and see a list of open tasks. 538:This article is supported by 499:Template:WikiProject Politics 490:and see a list of open tasks. 379:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 4369:Old requests for peer review 4214:Perhaps on XXI , we know it 4204:02:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC) 3997:Gregg, Samuel (2017-02-10). 3985:13:53, 24 October 2017 (UTC) 3644:08:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC) 3560:20:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC) 3535:22:33, 31 October 2014 (UTC) 3520:21:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC) 2924:13:07, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 2792:11:34, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 2660:NY Times Partial Transcript: 2429:Came here from a posting on 1713:22:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 1697:21:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 1626:05:48, 30 October 2010 (UTC) 1487:17:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC) 1461:18:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 1441:18:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC) 1368:18:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 1352:07:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 1301:01:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 541:American politics task force 4459:C-Class Philosophy articles 4224:01:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC) 4187:11:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC) 4022:Sammin, Kyle (2017-04-25). 3493:14:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 3475:02:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 3067:to reactivate your request. 3055:has been answered. Set the 2994:16:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 2975:19:51, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 2909:17:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 2893:06:45, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 2859:19:37, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 2437:. This is the core of the 2206:21:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC) 1834:and then present them in a 1652:06:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 1413:14:31, 18 August 2012 (UTC) 1332:Liberals and Communitarians 4550: 4404:C-Class sociology articles 4062:17:13, 28 April 2018 (UTC) 3728:17:48, 13 April 2019 (UTC) 3649:Confused/conflated topics? 3250:01:21, 20 April 2014 (UTC) 3226:17:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 3155:20:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC) 3140:19:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC) 3118:06:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 3095:07:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 2951:10:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC) 2844:18:39, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1867:05:01, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 1852:23:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC) 1820:22:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC) 1786:09:08, 20 March 2010 (UTC) 1597:11:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC) 942:project's importance scale 764:project's importance scale 651:project's importance scale 522:project's importance scale 411:project's importance scale 4414:C-Class politics articles 4350:00:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC) 4318:22:12, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 4269:21:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 4254:20:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC) 4150:18:41, 29 June 2022 (UTC) 4067:Should this be merged to 3949:16:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 3923:07:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 3891:05:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 3868:03:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 3199:19:52, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 3175:15:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC) 2828:23:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC) 2808:20:19, 17 June 2019 (UTC) 2491:16:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC) 2451:16:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC) 2425:01:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC) 2410:23:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 2395:15:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 2368:12:02, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 2344:11:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 2324:11:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 2306:04:40, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 2283:17:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 2259:17:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 2245:04:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 2230:02:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 1985:09:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC) 1966:08:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC) 1942:08:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC) 1927:07:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC) 1826:It does not qualify as a 1791:Progressivism as insanity 1766:15:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1275:20:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 1232:20:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 1201:20:06, 17 June 2019 (UTC) 957: 935: 872:WikiProject United States 841: 799: 770: 757: 688: 644: 577: 537: 515: 448: 404: 337: 316: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 4111:10:47, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 4092:09:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 3782:21:53, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 3763:15:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 3623:01:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 3607:22:23, 4 June 2015 (UTC) 3569:"Progressive" as autonym 1239:Ah. That's much better.) 961:WikiProject U.S. history 877:United States of America 608:WikiProject Conservatism 4324:Encyclopedia Britannica 3352:Progress Party (Norway) 3083:to attacked the --: --> 2439:policy on verifiability 1905:01:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC) 1886:01:09, 3 May 2010 (UTC) 775:Associated task forces: 4374:C-Class vital articles 2937: 1329: 954: 922:United States articles 796: 719:WikiProject Philosophy 534: 75:avoid personal attacks 3075:1935 election --: --> 3037:Minor edits to Canada 2691:other progressives. 1318: 953: 795: 631:Conservatism articles 533: 368:WikiProject Sociology 302:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 295:level-5 vital article 100:Neutral point of view 2479:WP:RSN#Progressivism 1840:no original research 1720:Tory party of Canada 1492:Organize data better 1105:relevant style guide 1101:varieties of English 864:United States portal 679:Social and political 479:WikiProject Politics 105:No original research 1838:. Please see also 1523:editing the article 1429:meanings of words. 1405:Charles Edwin Shipp 1307:A better heuristic? 1103:. According to the 890:Articles Requested! 744:Philosophy articles 600:Conservatism portal 4242:WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY 3959:Source reliability 3125:Anti-progressivism 2477:The posting is at 1745:"Idea of progress" 1029:Updated 2009-11-28 955: 797: 729:general discussion 535: 391:sociology articles 304:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 3712: 3700:comment added by 3550:comment added by 3216:comment added by 3201: 3189:comment added by 3071: 3070: 2872:to other isms by 2782:comment added by 2772:Better definition 2273:comment added by 1911:australia section 1872:changes or reform 1810:comment added by 1756:comment added by 1687:comment added by 1551: 1550: 1543: 1516:layout guidelines 1479:David Lloyd-Jones 1433:David Lloyd-Jones 1291:comment added by 1234: 1222:comment added by 1165: 1164: 1115: 1114: 1056: 1055: 980: 979: 976: 975: 972: 971: 814: 813: 810: 809: 806: 805: 711:Philosophy portal 661: 660: 657: 656: 556: 555: 552: 551: 502:politics articles 421: 420: 417: 416: 273: 272: 244: 243: 216: 215: 66:Assume good faith 43: 4541: 4286:reliable sources 4239: 4088: 4048:This oepns with 4038: 4037: 4035: 4034: 4019: 4013: 4012: 4010: 4009: 3994: 3971: 3969: 3768:That's a lot of 3562: 3247: 3241: 3228: 3104: 3103: 3062: 3058: 3048: 3047: 3041: 2794: 2285: 2202: 2197: 1822: 1768: 1736: 1730: 1699: 1655: 1546: 1539: 1535: 1532: 1526: 1507: 1506: 1499: 1303: 1160: 1125: 1117: 1068:This article is 1065: 1058: 1030: 993: 992: 982: 924: 923: 920: 917: 914: 866: 861: 860: 859: 850: 843: 842: 837: 834: 823: 816: 782: 772: 746: 745: 742: 739: 736: 713: 708: 707: 706: 697: 690: 689: 684: 681: 670: 663: 633: 632: 629: 626: 623: 602: 597: 596: 595: 586: 579: 578: 573: 565: 558: 504: 503: 500: 497: 494: 473: 468: 467: 457: 450: 449: 444: 441: 430: 423: 393: 392: 389: 386: 383: 362: 357: 356: 346: 339: 338: 333: 325: 318: 301: 292: 291: 284: 283: 275: 253: 246: 225: 218: 210: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 4549: 4548: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4359: 4358: 4302:Talk:Nazism/FAQ 4233: 4231: 4212: 4158: 4122: 4090: 4086: 4073: 4046: 4041: 4032: 4030: 4021: 4020: 4016: 4007: 4005: 3996: 3995: 3991: 3983: 3967: 3965: 3961: 3735: 3730: 3651: 3631: 3591: 3571: 3545: 3481:New York Times/ 3257: 3245: 3239: 3211: 3207: 3128: 3101: 3060: 3056: 3045: 3039: 3015:social democrat 3006: 2959: 2815: 2777: 2774: 2602:Hillary Clinton 2268: 2200: 2195: 2100:personal attack 2000: 1913: 1874: 1844:The Four Deuces 1828:reliable source 1805: 1793: 1774: 1751: 1747: 1734: 1728: 1705:The Four Deuces 1682: 1678: 1645: 1634: 1564:" usually in a 1559: 1547: 1536: 1530: 1527: 1521:Please help by 1520: 1508: 1504: 1494: 1453:The Four Deuces 1448: 1360:The Four Deuces 1309: 1286: 1283: 1208: 1173: 1161: 1155: 1130: 1109:broad consensus 1076:Oxford spelling 1072:British English 1052: 1051: 1004: 990: 921: 918: 915: 912: 911: 910: 896:Become a Member 862: 857: 855: 835: 829: 780: 743: 740: 737: 734: 733: 709: 704: 702: 682: 676: 630: 627: 624: 621: 620: 598: 593: 591: 571: 501: 498: 495: 492: 491: 471:Politics portal 469: 462: 442: 436: 390: 387: 384: 381: 380: 358: 351: 331: 299: 289: 212: 211: 206: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 4547: 4545: 4537: 4536: 4531: 4526: 4521: 4516: 4511: 4506: 4501: 4496: 4491: 4486: 4481: 4476: 4471: 4466: 4461: 4456: 4451: 4446: 4441: 4436: 4431: 4426: 4421: 4416: 4411: 4406: 4401: 4396: 4391: 4386: 4381: 4376: 4371: 4361: 4360: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4337: 4334: 4330: 4327: 4294: 4290: 4282: 4272: 4271: 4230: 4227: 4211: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4190: 4189: 4157: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4121: 4118: 4116: 4114: 4113: 4080: 4072: 4065: 4045: 4042: 4040: 4039: 4028:The Federalist 4014: 3988: 3973: 3960: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3937:disambiguation 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3770:WP:CRYSTALBALL 3734: 3731: 3718: 3682: 3681: 3678: 3675: 3672: 3669: 3666: 3663: 3650: 3647: 3630: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3590: 3587: 3576:PeterColdridge 3570: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3552:184.145.74.119 3538: 3537: 3512:184.145.74.119 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3452:184.145.74.119 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3408:disambiguation 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3357:disambiguation 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3330:184.145.74.119 3322: 3321: 3305: 3304: 3273:184.145.74.119 3256: 3253: 3235: 3234: 3218:74.192.227.151 3206: 3203: 3158: 3157: 3127: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3085: 3082: 3079: 3074: 3069: 3068: 3049: 3038: 3035: 3005: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2978: 2977: 2958: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2938: 2931: 2927: 2926: 2916:72.228.190.243 2896: 2895: 2885:147.235.199.20 2877: 2866: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2814: 2811: 2773: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2752:216.114.194.20 2747: 2737:216.114.194.20 2708:216.114.194.20 2677:216.114.194.20 2672: 2668: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2656: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2646: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2636: 2635: 2630: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2606: 2603: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2570: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2537: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2402:216.114.194.20 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2360:216.114.194.20 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2336:216.114.194.20 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2316:216.114.194.20 2294:living persons 2275:216.114.194.20 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2251:216.114.194.20 2222:216.114.194.20 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2163:216.114.194.20 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2135:216.114.194.20 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2074:216.114.194.20 2045:216.114.194.20 2042: 2020: 2005:216.114.194.20 1999: 1996: 1994: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1945: 1944: 1912: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1873: 1870: 1859:MondoManDevout 1855: 1854: 1836:neutral manner 1792: 1789: 1773: 1770: 1758:66.223.182.207 1746: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1650:comment added 1633: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1609: 1608: 1558: 1555: 1549: 1548: 1511: 1509: 1502: 1493: 1490: 1447: 1444: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1371: 1370: 1339: 1335: 1327: 1325: 1323: 1321: 1308: 1305: 1282: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1262: 1255: 1251: 1240: 1214: 1207: 1204: 1172: 1169: 1167: 1163: 1162: 1157: 1153: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1136: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1126: 1120: 1113: 1112: 1066: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1032: 987: 985: 978: 977: 974: 973: 970: 969: 966:Mid-importance 956: 946: 945: 938:Mid-importance 934: 928: 927: 925: 909: 908: 903: 898: 893: 886: 884:Template Usage 880: 868: 867: 851: 839: 838: 836:Mid‑importance 824: 812: 811: 808: 807: 804: 803: 798: 788: 787: 785: 783: 777: 776: 768: 767: 760:Low-importance 756: 750: 749: 747: 715: 714: 698: 686: 685: 683:Low‑importance 671: 659: 658: 655: 654: 647:Mid-importance 643: 637: 636: 634: 617:the discussion 604: 603: 587: 575: 574: 572:Mid‑importance 566: 554: 553: 550: 549: 546:Mid-importance 536: 526: 525: 518:Mid-importance 514: 508: 507: 505: 488:the discussion 475: 474: 458: 446: 445: 443:Mid‑importance 431: 419: 418: 415: 414: 407:Mid-importance 403: 397: 396: 394: 377:the discussion 364: 363: 360:Society portal 347: 335: 334: 332:Mid‑importance 326: 314: 313: 307: 285: 271: 270: 254: 242: 241: 234:the discussion 226: 214: 213: 204: 202: 201: 198: 197: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4546: 4535: 4532: 4530: 4527: 4525: 4522: 4520: 4517: 4515: 4512: 4510: 4507: 4505: 4502: 4500: 4497: 4495: 4492: 4490: 4487: 4485: 4482: 4480: 4477: 4475: 4472: 4470: 4467: 4465: 4462: 4460: 4457: 4455: 4452: 4450: 4447: 4445: 4442: 4440: 4437: 4435: 4432: 4430: 4427: 4425: 4422: 4420: 4417: 4415: 4412: 4410: 4407: 4405: 4402: 4400: 4397: 4395: 4392: 4390: 4387: 4385: 4382: 4380: 4377: 4375: 4372: 4370: 4367: 4366: 4364: 4351: 4347: 4343: 4338: 4335: 4331: 4328: 4325: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4315: 4311: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4280: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4237: 4228: 4226: 4225: 4221: 4217: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4197: 4192: 4191: 4188: 4184: 4180: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4168: 4164: 4155: 4151: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4132: 4128: 4120:NPOV concerns 4119: 4117: 4112: 4108: 4104: 4100: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4089: 4083: 4078: 4070: 4066: 4064: 4063: 4059: 4055: 4054:32.208.220.30 4051: 4043: 4029: 4025: 4018: 4015: 4004: 4000: 3993: 3990: 3987: 3986: 3981: 3977: 3972: 3970: 3958: 3950: 3946: 3942: 3938: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3924: 3920: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3898: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3875: 3874: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3856:New Statesman 3853: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3841: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3830: 3827: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3751: 3748: 3745: 3743: 3738: 3732: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3699: 3692: 3689: 3685: 3679: 3676: 3673: 3670: 3667: 3664: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3655: 3648: 3646: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3616: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3588: 3586: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3568: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3448: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3404:progressivism 3401: 3396: 3395:progressivism 3392: 3388: 3385:I agree with 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3353: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3307: 3306: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3290: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3268: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3254: 3252: 3251: 3248: 3242: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3204: 3202: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3182: 3177: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3163: 3162: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3132:99.185.229.78 3126: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3087:24.57.210.141 3084:to attack the 3080:amoug --: --> 3078: 3077:1935 election 3066: 3063:parameter to 3054: 3050: 3043: 3042: 3036: 3034: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3020: 3018: 3016: 3009: 3003: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2939: 2936: 2932: 2929: 2928: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2812: 2810: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2795: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2784:98.87.146.180 2781: 2771: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2748: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2673: 2671: 2667: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2645: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2629: 2626: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2607: 2604: 2601: 2600: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2383:New Democrats 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2286: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2207: 2204: 2203: 2198: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2104:New Democrats 2101: 2097: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2040: 2039: 2033: 2032: 2027: 2026: 2021: 2019: 2015: 2014: 2010: 2006: 1997: 1995: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1871: 1869: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1802: 1797: 1790: 1788: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1771: 1769: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1744: 1740: 1737: 1731: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1700: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1689:206.116.10.54 1686: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1662:72.228.177.92 1658: 1657: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1643: 1639: 1638:86.176.49.109 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1610: 1605: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1562: 1556: 1554: 1545: 1542: 1534: 1524: 1518: 1517: 1512:This article 1510: 1501: 1500: 1497: 1491: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1469: 1466: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1445: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1427: 1422: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1336: 1333: 1328: 1317: 1313: 1306: 1304: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1263: 1260: 1259:basic decency 1256: 1252: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1213: 1205: 1203: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1181: 1177: 1170: 1168: 1150: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1124: 1119: 1118: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1077: 1073: 1067: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1048: 1047:Cite sources. 1045: 1042: 1039: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1003: 1001: 1000:Progressivism 997: 986: 984: 983: 967: 964:(assessed as 963: 962: 952: 948: 947: 943: 939: 933: 930: 929: 926: 913:United States 907: 904: 902: 899: 897: 894: 892: 891: 887: 885: 882: 881: 878: 874: 873: 865: 854: 852: 849: 845: 844: 840: 833: 828: 827:United States 825: 822: 818: 802: 794: 790: 789: 786: 784: 779: 778: 773: 769: 765: 761: 755: 752: 751: 748: 731: 730: 725: 721: 720: 712: 701: 699: 696: 692: 691: 687: 680: 675: 672: 669: 665: 652: 648: 642: 639: 638: 635: 618: 614: 610: 609: 601: 590: 588: 585: 581: 580: 576: 570: 567: 564: 560: 547: 544:(assessed as 543: 542: 532: 528: 527: 523: 519: 513: 510: 509: 506: 489: 485: 481: 480: 472: 466: 461: 459: 456: 452: 451: 447: 440: 435: 432: 429: 425: 412: 408: 402: 399: 398: 395: 378: 374: 370: 369: 361: 355: 350: 348: 345: 341: 340: 336: 330: 327: 324: 320: 315: 311: 305: 297: 296: 286: 282: 277: 276: 268: 267: 262: 258: 257:Progressivism 255: 252: 248: 247: 239: 235: 231: 227: 224: 220: 219: 200: 199: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 25:Progressivism 22: 18: 17: 4297: 4284:If you have 4232: 4213: 4196:Mureungdowon 4159: 4123: 4115: 4074: 4049: 4047: 4031:. Retrieved 4017: 4006:. Retrieved 3992: 3966: 3962: 3879:The Guardian 3878: 3855: 3826:The Guardian 3825: 3752: 3749: 3746: 3739: 3736: 3714: 3696:— Preceding 3693: 3690: 3686: 3683: 3656: 3652: 3632: 3592: 3572: 3546:— Preceding 3509: 3480: 3411: 3403: 3399: 3394: 3390: 3288: 3269: 3265: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3236: 3212:— Preceding 3208: 3185:— Preceding 3181:Conservatism 3178: 3164: 3160: 3159: 3129: 3105: 3072: 3064: 3053:edit request 3021: 3012: 3010: 3007: 2934: 2897: 2880: 2873: 2869: 2816: 2796: 2778:— Preceding 2775: 2674: 2669: 2664: 2654: 2650:Barack Obama 2642: 2627: 2623: 2612: 2569: 2536: 2287: 2269:— Preceding 2265: 2218: 2193: 2041: 2034: 2028: 2022: 2017: 2016: 2001: 1993: 1956: 1917: 1914: 1878:77.248.75.39 1875: 1856: 1812:76.254.25.19 1798: 1794: 1778:79.176.49.28 1775: 1752:— Preceding 1748: 1701: 1679: 1635: 1613: 1587: 1584: 1581: 1578: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1563: 1560: 1552: 1537: 1528: 1513: 1495: 1477: 1473: 1470: 1467: 1464: 1449: 1431: 1425: 1423: 1419: 1372: 1342: 1337: 1331: 1330: 1319: 1314: 1310: 1293:202.20.73.21 1287:— Preceding 1284: 1258: 1247: 1243: 1218:— Preceding 1209: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1166: 1139: 1127: 1096: 1095:; note that 1092: 1089:organization 1088: 1084: 1080: 1069: 1046: 1033: 1026: 1020: 1014: 1008: 994: 988: 959: 937: 901:Project Talk 889: 870: 759: 727: 717: 646: 622:Conservatism 613:conservatism 606: 569:Conservatism 539: 517: 477: 406: 366: 310:WikiProjects 293: 264: 256: 237: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 4229:Lead issues 4163:Pete unseth 4003:CNSNews.com 3842:, BBC, 2016 3702:141.131.2.3 3636:85.194.2.41 3400:progressive 3391:progressive 3240:Orange Mike 3205:Bogus title 2836:Dr. Morbius 2800:152.3.34.82 2619:Transcript: 2288:Please see 2196:Will Beback 1934:DanielRigal 1897:DanielRigal 1806:—Preceding 1729:Orange Mike 1683:—Preceding 1646:—Preceding 1618:PhilLiberty 1375:76.14.54.78 1267:DanielRigal 1193:152.3.34.82 1070:written in 261:peer review 259:received a 148:free images 31:not a forum 4363:Categories 4279:verifiable 4127:RohenTahir 4087:reply here 4044:Neutrality 4033:2017-10-04 4008:2017-10-04 3911:liberalism 3897:liberalism 3740:Is it the 3691:Thoughts? 3447:ad hominem 3271:grounds.-- 3057:|answered= 2901:PokeHomsar 2881:misleading 2874:misleading 2820:Goldfritha 2813:Neutrality 2018:Citations: 1426:soi disant 1144:/Archive 2 1141:/Archive 1 996:To-do list 735:Philosophy 724:philosophy 674:Philosophy 3968:HapHaxion 3742:alt-right 3720:Joesadlon 3412:political 3289:political 3233:parties). 3167:BenMcLean 2870:injustice 2096:WP:VANDAL 1531:June 2009 1496:Add tag: 1344:R33f3rman 1338:Citation: 1316:follows: 1281:Australia 382:Sociology 373:sociology 329:Sociology 298:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 4310:Grayfell 4246:Grayfell 4161:complex. 4142:sbelknap 4077:progress 4069:progress 3980:contribs 3900:article. 3774:Koncorde 3698:unsigned 3548:unsigned 3214:unsigned 3187:unsigned 2967:10stone5 2851:10stone5 2780:unsigned 2435:WP:TRUTH 2271:unsigned 2060:ClovisPt 1958:Digmores 1919:Digmores 1808:unsigned 1754:unsigned 1685:unsigned 1570:economic 1289:unsigned 1220:unsigned 1128:Archives 493:Politics 484:politics 439:American 434:Politics 266:archived 230:deletion 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 4342:Rhosnes 4261:Rhosnes 4236:Rhosnes 3915:Knox490 3860:Knox490 3755:Knox490 3599:Dead3y3 3024:Ratha K 2750:here.-- 1832:notable 1676:Ireland 1648:undated 1607:goals." 1604:statism 1566:statist 1093:analyse 1085:realize 1024:refresh 1012:history 940:on the 832:History 762:on the 649:on the 520:on the 409:on the 300:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 4079:... -- 3858:, 2017 3828:, 2016 3787:times. 3694:- MC 3527:Embram 3467:Embram 3417:Embram 3398:words 3294:Embram 3110:BryanG 2608:Video: 2431:WP:RSN 1589:Mhuben 1574:social 1446:Canada 1250:sense? 1081:colour 906:Alerts 306:scale. 126:Google 4306:WP:OR 4289:this. 3797:late. 3445:Very 3081:among 3061:|ans= 3051:This 2943:Inops 2443:Yobol 2290:WP:RS 1893:point 1803:: --> 1614:means 1074:with 1018:watch 287:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 4346:talk 4314:talk 4265:talk 4250:talk 4220:talk 4200:talk 4183:talk 4167:talk 4146:talk 4131:talk 4107:talk 4058:talk 3976:talk 3945:talk 3919:talk 3909:The 3895:The 3887:talk 3864:talk 3778:talk 3759:talk 3724:talk 3706:talk 3640:talk 3619:talk 3603:talk 3580:talk 3556:talk 3531:talk 3516:talk 3489:talk 3471:talk 3456:talk 3421:talk 3402:and 3393:and 3365:talk 3334:talk 3315:talk 3298:talk 3277:talk 3246:Talk 3222:talk 3195:talk 3171:talk 3151:talk 3136:talk 3114:talk 3106:Done 3091:talk 3028:talk 2990:talk 2971:talk 2947:talk 2920:talk 2905:talk 2889:talk 2855:talk 2840:talk 2824:talk 2804:talk 2788:talk 2756:talk 2741:talk 2727:talk 2712:talk 2697:talk 2681:talk 2487:talk 2447:talk 2421:talk 2406:talk 2391:talk 2364:talk 2340:talk 2320:talk 2302:talk 2279:talk 2255:talk 2241:talk 2226:talk 2201:talk 2167:talk 2139:talk 2112:talk 2094:See 2078:talk 2064:talk 2049:talk 2009:talk 1981:talk 1962:talk 1938:talk 1923:talk 1901:talk 1882:talk 1863:talk 1848:talk 1816:talk 1782:talk 1762:talk 1735:Talk 1726:. -- 1718:The 1709:talk 1693:talk 1666:talk 1642:talk 1622:talk 1593:talk 1483:talk 1457:talk 1437:talk 1409:talk 1394:talk 1379:talk 1364:talk 1348:talk 1297:talk 1271:talk 1228:talk 1197:talk 1097:-ize 1006:edit 998:for 238:keep 236:was 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 4179:TFD 4103:TFD 3941:TFD 3883:TFD 3615:TFD 3485:TFD 3387:TFD 3361:TFD 3311:TFD 3183:. 3147:TFD 3059:or 2986:TFD 2723:TFD 2693:TFD 2483:TFD 2481:. 2417:TFD 2387:TFD 2298:TFD 2237:TFD 2108:TFD 1977:TFD 1842:. 1732:| 1644:) 1390:TFD 1248:any 1244:any 932:Mid 754:Low 641:Mid 512:Mid 401:Mid 176:TWL 4365:: 4348:) 4316:) 4298:do 4267:) 4252:) 4222:) 4202:) 4185:) 4169:) 4148:) 4133:) 4109:) 4060:) 4026:. 4001:. 3978:/ 3947:) 3921:) 3889:) 3866:) 3854:, 3780:) 3761:) 3726:) 3708:) 3642:) 3621:) 3605:) 3582:) 3558:) 3533:) 3518:) 3491:) 3473:) 3458:) 3423:) 3367:) 3336:) 3317:) 3300:) 3279:) 3243:| 3237:-- 3224:) 3197:) 3173:) 3153:) 3138:) 3116:) 3093:) 3065:no 3030:) 3022:-- 3019:" 2992:) 2973:) 2949:) 2922:) 2907:) 2891:) 2857:) 2842:) 2826:) 2806:) 2790:) 2758:) 2743:) 2729:) 2714:) 2699:) 2683:) 2675:-- 2489:) 2449:) 2441:. 2423:) 2408:) 2393:) 2366:) 2342:) 2322:) 2304:) 2281:) 2257:) 2243:) 2228:) 2169:) 2141:) 2114:) 2080:) 2066:) 2051:) 2011:) 1983:) 1964:) 1940:) 1925:) 1903:) 1884:) 1865:) 1850:) 1818:) 1784:) 1764:) 1711:) 1695:) 1668:) 1624:) 1595:) 1485:) 1459:) 1439:) 1411:) 1396:) 1381:) 1366:) 1350:) 1299:) 1273:) 1230:) 1199:) 1091:, 1087:, 1083:, 968:). 830:: 781:/ 677:: 548:). 437:: 193:, 156:) 54:; 4344:( 4312:( 4263:( 4248:( 4238:: 4234:@ 4218:( 4198:( 4181:( 4165:( 4144:( 4129:( 4105:( 4084:| 4071:? 4056:( 4036:. 4011:. 3982:) 3974:( 3943:( 3917:( 3885:( 3862:( 3776:( 3757:( 3722:( 3704:( 3638:( 3617:( 3601:( 3578:( 3554:( 3529:( 3514:( 3487:( 3469:( 3454:( 3419:( 3363:( 3332:( 3313:( 3296:( 3275:( 3220:( 3193:( 3169:( 3149:( 3134:( 3112:( 3089:( 3026:( 3017:; 2988:( 2969:( 2945:( 2918:( 2903:( 2887:( 2853:( 2838:( 2822:( 2802:( 2786:( 2754:( 2739:( 2725:( 2710:( 2695:( 2679:( 2485:( 2445:( 2419:( 2404:( 2389:( 2362:( 2338:( 2318:( 2300:( 2277:( 2253:( 2239:( 2224:( 2165:( 2137:( 2110:( 2076:( 2062:( 2047:( 2007:( 1979:( 1960:( 1936:( 1921:( 1899:( 1880:( 1861:( 1846:( 1814:( 1780:( 1760:( 1707:( 1691:( 1664:( 1654:. 1640:( 1620:( 1591:( 1544:) 1538:( 1533:) 1529:( 1519:. 1481:( 1455:( 1435:( 1407:( 1392:( 1377:( 1362:( 1346:( 1295:( 1269:( 1226:( 1195:( 1111:. 1079:( 1027:· 1021:· 1015:· 1009:· 1002:: 944:. 766:. 653:. 524:. 413:. 312:: 240:. 195:2 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index