Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Prometheus (2012 film)

Source 📝

1975:
the franchise doesn't include them. Even the table of films you have linked to explicitly segregates them. Aliens has crossed over with Terminator, Superman, Batman, and the Avengers, are we including those as legitimate aspects of the franchise? If anything, the Alien franchise page needs updating to explicitly separate out the Alien vs Predator films as spin offs instead of trying to treat them as some form of loose canon, else we wouldn't have a separate Aliens vs Predator franchise page. That page is a mess overall, Alien: Romulus takes place between Alien and Aliens but it's a spin-off? This "It is the first film installment of the Alien vs. Predator franchise, the fifth film in the Alien franchise and third film of the Predator franchise," is genuinely embarrassing and a mess, and now we're trying to further segment the alien series into a prometheus series? You can't even say Prometheus is the first chronological film because we have to account for freaking Aliens vs Predator 1? Embarrassing. It's a separate franchise of spin off fanfiction based on a comic book. The alien series are films dealing exclusively with the xenomorphs/Weyland/Yutani, and if you ain't down with that, I got two words for ya:
572: 551: 754: 1027: 774: 924: 897: 1835:
it surrounded by insectoid creatures the size of a human foot, and it is explained that they must have evolved from "space microbes" on the capsule. A little later the Klingons arrive, and the creatures have evolved into large snake-like creatures, big enough to wrap themselves around the arm and torso of a Klingon, who kills it by poking out its throat with his thumb. Klingons are bigger than humans, so presumably the snake creatures would be big enough to kill a human.
253: 1201: 934: 1096: 1180: 1075: 449: 286: 505: 480: 823: 802: 684: 656: 1291: 223: 1801: 1106: 1956:) also see the AvP films as part of the "Alien" franchise or series of films. I also noticed a few sources that don't list them, but including them seems more common and the best I think we can say is that it's inconsistent. Therefore we should be clearer here as to what we're referring to, especially as we link to our own article that doesn't obviously support the number quoted. 1039: 694: 1211: 1890:
I think it would be better to add a small qualifier here, but I'm not certain what would be best. Fifth film in the mainline/main/core Alien franchise? Not particularly happy with these, but at least it's correct. The franchise article refers to the actual Alien films as Anthology or Original, but I'm not a fan of using these either. Thoughts?
582: 1993:
clearly not (as well as failing the common sense test there isn't any sourcing). My original suggestion was something like "the 5th installment of the main (or) core Alien Franchise". I agree with you that it's better for from an editorial perspective to place Prometheus in the context of the films dealing with the narrative of the xenomorph.
2687:
The narrative scope of a film series also does not define whether or not films are part of a franchise. The Dark Knight trilogy and The Batman are both clearly part of the Batman media franchise, but would be usually described as separate series and do not share canon. Again, whether or not something
1974:
People including the AvP films on the Aliens franchise page doesn't shift reality, those spin off films are of course linked to the ALien franchise because they ahve aliens in them, but is it canon that Predators exist in this universe? No. They're fan fiction spin offs and any serious discussion of
1934:
includes them as part of the franchise, with the franchise being sub-divided into the "Anthology" of which this is the fifth and the "cross-over films"), and the info box breaks this up further with the original series, and the Prometheus films (of which this is the first). Obviously Knowledge (XXG)
1889:
and while I agree that it's probably better to refer to this as the fifth film, it's unfortunate anyone who clicks the link to the franchise article will see that the AvP films are listed as part of the franchise, and so it's technically the 7th in order of release. For consistency / accuracies sake
2695:
additional research is that there there is disagreement as to whether the Alien media franchise includes the AvP films, but that the Alien series does not. My original request for a qualifier isn't needed if we talk about the series as opposed to the franchise, most sources group all the main films
2184:
I have removed the reference to it's numbered place in the franchise from the first paragraph of the lead entirely to avoid further disruption. If it's included in the lead, then it should really be addressed (and sourced) in the body unless it's very uncontroversial. Sources (including some of the
1996:
However, there are enough sources that (however grudgingly) include the AvP films as part of the alien franchise (which is a marketing term ultimately) for there to be enough reason to make it clear to the reader what we're doing. Some google search statistics in addition to what I mentioned above;
1834:
There's a bit in the third film where they go down to the Genesis Planet, on which life evolves quickly and unstably as a result of some experiment or other done by Kirk's son. They find the pod which carried Spock's body after his death (the tomb is already empty and he has been reborn). They find
2576:
Right, but you didn't state that at the time. This is not to dismiss your opinion, but even a fan wiki is not representitive of an audiences POV as it can't speak for them as a whole. Regardless this approach of saying who has or who has not listed the film as part of the series does not bring any
2222:
It is but the ALien franchise page, and mainly IP editors, treat it based on chronological release, so even though AvP is a separate franchise, they treat those films as installments in both the Alien and Predator franchises. I believe there may be hints in some of the lesser Predator sequels post
1959:
I don't really care whether it's better to describe this film as the 5th of the non-crossover films (i.e. Alien Franchise + a qualifier), or the 7th film featuring Xenomorphs (i.e. just Alien Franchise as per our article and multiple sources) or to not link to our franchise article at all, but the
1992:
I'm not saying that page isn't a mess, or wrong, but we link to it. We could remove the link, as I suggested above, rather than link to possibly incorrect or contradictory information. I also wasn't suggesting any of the other film franchises you mentioned are part of the Alien franchise, they're
1830:
I've just watched Star Treks 2 (Khan) and 3 (The Search For Spock) on Channel 4 Catchup, which was either filling a gap in my cultural knowledge or three hours of my life which I'm never going to get back. I'd seen bits of both of them in the early 90s, but had never watched either right through.
2108:
On the topic of what film are or aren't in the series, I would try to find scholarship on how the series is seen as a whole. We can run around all day finding sources casually referring to a film belonging to a series, but if its truly a complex issue, maybe investigate what outside sources have
1838:
I wonder whether this was - either consciously or unconsciously - the inspiration for the worms which evolve in the black goo into snake creatures strong enough to break the arm of and then kill Milburn the biologist. The origin of the creatures is not explained at all in "Prometheus", no doubt
2185:
more scholarly ones I checked in the book results) are divided on the definition / scope of the "franchise", so if we're not going to provide the full picture it's better not to do it all than mislead / confuse the reader. If the fifth is re-instated I would also support the footnote approach.
2032:. It needs input from Wikiproject film ultimately because adding something like "main" or "core" is us making up a caveat to explain something that, IMO, doesn't need explaining, but as we're both on different sides of the aisle and the use of "fifth" is longterm, it needs outsider input. 1861:
The closing sentence in the plot describes content which was not picked up in any of the subsequent films in the franchise. It looks like a non sequitur. It should at least state, "In the lifeboat left behind on the planet, an alien creature bursts out of the Engineer's chest."
2712:
I would slightly lean towards the film series variant, as I think that this will come up again if not. We can still link to the franchise article as although they name things a little differently there, at least readers will see it's the 5th in something. Thoughts?
2703:
IMO the status quo version for this content is without the sentence, not with. This is what was FAC approved in 2013 and the reference to "installment number" was only introduced without discussion in June 2023 (and has been disputed ever since via
2449:
don't count it, using the very, very gross statement " it is the seventh installment in the Alien franchise (ninth if one counts the Alien vs. Predator films)". I think at this point I'd be inclined to go with fifth or not include it at all.
2046:
OK, requested. Maybe a TP watcher here will also chime in. Again, to be clear, I think 5th is the best number to choose, I just think additional clarity is better to avoid confusion (and also edits & reverts which is what caught my eye).
1806:
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Knowledge (XXG) rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
2699:
From a reader perspective, stating something in the lead which isn't really discussed in the body text, which isn't supported by a overwhelming majority of sources, and links to a WP article that directly contradicts the claim is not a good
2123:
I do agree, that part wasn't in the version that passed featured article, it was in the second paragraph when discussing it's initial development as a fifth entry. The problem is the IPs constantly adding it if we take it out.
1929:
I'm not sure that what you've stated above is the common view, so I still think we need to further qualify the term "Alien franchise". Our article for the Alien franchise, which is linked in the lead, includes the AvP films
2535:
films. Others do not. I don't really think playing it to a numbers game is appropriate here, so I would try to look at bigger views of the series. Not to mention that while some of these sources seem like reliable sources
385: 267: 2853:
While I don't think this is codified in the MoS, I think noting the installment number in the lead is pretty standard/good practice on film articles, as it provides helpful context for readers. Whether this constitutes
153: 2902: 366: 2922: 2008:
There may not be much serious discussion of the AvP films, but that's because they're fucking terrible, not because the sources consistently don't include them in the overall franchise (here's another one,
2530:
franchise. While this information would generally seemingly could be responded with a simple 'well it's obvious isn't it?" the research above clearly shows that some sources consider some films "proper"
1267: 2727:
It's not about "canonicity", it's about sharing the same continuity. A franchise is different from a series; the latter must share the same continuity while the former can include reboots. For example,
842:
and other media on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the
2897: 2526:
stating whether or not its a fifth or sixth or however entry in a series, I would again stress the arguments here are probably better addressed by seeing how films are viewed as part of the larger
2987: 2548:, etc.) some are not (the fandom page for example) many of them are kind of listicles that are just for google searches for finding narrative consistency or where the films can be streamed. 2629:", the term ""media franchise" "should not be taken as self-evident." The article goes into detail on how our own perceptions as an audience can suggest what is a "real/proper" part of the 2061:
Oh, and just to add that we wouldn't be making up a caveat, I believe we'd be just be reflecting what the sources are saying. Whether or not anyone else agrees with me, I guess I'll see.
964: 419: 1052: 907: 783: 670: 638: 763: 666: 292: 2917: 628: 981: 328: 147: 2328: 1162: 404: 2927: 2680:
Whether something is canon or not, is not a defining feature as to whether it is considered part of a media franchise (which is what the franchise articles represent, see
2413: 604: 214: 2093:
th film in a series, but we probably should not but so much emphasis on these points unless its discussed within sources, and I can't say I've done a lot of research on
2262: 2012:). Do you have any comments on the sourcing I'm providing, or anything that supports your assertion that RSs don't generally consider AvP part of the overall franchise? 1017: 3007: 2992: 1152: 1057: 2912: 2982: 2355: 1007: 44: 971: 3012: 2015:
Again, all I'm asking is that we make it clear with a single word that we're not including the AvP films when we talk about it being the 5th film in the lead.
1128: 595: 556: 79: 2952: 844: 2997: 2942: 976: 3002: 2947: 2398: 879: 2937: 190: 2977: 2967: 869: 1119: 1080: 85: 2892: 3022: 1257: 2445:
Anecdotal research but in general they primarily don't count AvP or even explicitly state it is not part of the Alien series. Even the IPs on
947: 902: 2907: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 2637:
series, even if they make the films not connect narratively, at one point, they were presented as such and we shouldn't really ignore this.
2972: 30: 2329:
https://screenrant.com/are-alien-predator-movies-same-universe/#:~:text=One%20way%20of%20looking%20at,canon%20to%20the%20Alien%20franchise
2684:. It's worth noting that terminology film franchise / film series are not consistently defined within sources for most IP that I've seen. 3027: 2503: 2414:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240829000725/https://www.vulture.com/article/all-the-alien-movies-that-never-got-made-before-romulus.html
1233: 2957: 2377: 959: 2263:
https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2474862/alien-movie-timeline-explained-all-alien-movies-in-order-chronologically-and-by-release-date
1976: 712: 603:
and its affiliated companies on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
99: 2962: 168: 104: 20: 2782:
franchise. So, now that you mention it, I agree that an acceptable compromise would be to say "It is the fifth installment in the
2662:
If no consensus is reached here after extended discussion, the status quo (restoring the sentence) should be retained by default.
2097:, but I very rarely see films being discussed like this in other sources. With that, I'm going to say numbering these films fails 3017: 2626: 2297: 955:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
135: 74: 2932: 2562:
I only included the fan site to show even fans, who don't have the same standards we do on Knowledge (XXG), don't include AvP.
2356:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonthompson/2017/05/18/every-alien-box-office-take-ranked-worst-to-best-ahead-of-alien-covenant/
347: 2372: 830: 807: 460: 2277: 1224: 1185: 511: 485: 262: 65: 2344: 1945: 724: 716: 2339: 720: 707: 661: 2709:
Therefore, I'd be happy with either; "5th installment in the Alien film series" or no reference at all (i.e. FA version)
2501: 2257: 2688:
is made available as part of a box set by rights holders is not necessarily indicative of anything at franchise level.
2399:
https://www.independent.co.uk/extras/indybest/gadgets-tech/television/alien-films-in-chronological-order-b2603728.html
587: 129: 2387: 285: 2844: 2567: 2492:. It shouldn't be difficult to find sources that confirm the placement; here are a bunch of recent sources calling 2455: 2302: 2228: 2129: 2037: 1983: 1920: 1111: 222: 185: 2267: 109: 2779: 2165:", which I suppose works but is a bit wordy. All this being said, the "correct" answer is of course whatever the 125: 2633:
series, when that's not really up to us. If they were presented as part of the product, I'd say its part of the
2518:
The thing is when we play counting games like this, it doesn't really clarify that "more is more right". As per
2474: 2434: 233: 2759: 2408: 2307: 448: 252: 2166: 466: 272: 2577:
conclusive response. Many people include the AvP films, many do not. Who is to say that majority rules here?
1936: 2867: 2830: 2735: 2667: 2612: 2509: 2466: 2212: 175: 2287: 2089:
on whether this is the fifth/sixth/etc. I know it's been popular on wikipedia to say a film or item is the
2030: 571: 550: 516: 490: 2772: 2642: 2582: 2553: 2114: 1762: 1748: 1733: 1719: 1706: 1692: 1677: 1663: 1649: 1634: 1619: 1605: 1591: 1577: 1563: 1548: 1533: 1518: 1503: 1489: 1475: 1460: 1445: 1430: 1415: 1400: 1386: 1373: 1360: 1347: 1334: 1311: 24: 2839:
I'm honestly fine without "instalment" mentions at all but I agree that the IPdiots will keep adding it.
2419: 2141: 55: 2840: 2692: 2563: 2521: 2451: 2224: 2125: 2033: 1979: 1916: 1882: 1232:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1127:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2855: 2349: 2292: 70: 2497: 1948: 2282: 2174: 2170: 1847: 939: 600: 2272: 2000:"alien film franchise" Prometheus Covenant Predator" gives 8200 hits (310 if you restrict to books), 1863: 753: 276: 2378:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240824140920/https://www.vulture.com/article/alien-movies-ranked.html
1867: 1026: 773: 161: 2102: 2098: 2086: 141: 2863: 2826: 2718: 2663: 2608: 2505: 2208: 2190: 2150: 2066: 2052: 2020: 1965: 1911: 1895: 238: 2681: 2424: 2003:"alien film franchise" Prometheus Covenant -Predator" gives 3990 (126 if you restrict to books). 923: 896: 2783: 2767: 2638: 2578: 2549: 2393: 2298:
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2024/08/16/alien-movies-ranked/74769522007/
2159: 2148:
franchise than the seventh. I might add an explanatory footnote reading "Not counting the two
2110: 1931: 51: 2499: 2439: 2334: 2318: 2252: 235: 2373:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lists/best-alien-movies/9-alien-vs-predator-requiem-2007/
2730: 2403: 2278:
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/watch-alien-movies-in-chronological-order/
1843: 1124: 2360: 2238:
I did a basic search for "alien franchise" and these are the first results that came up:
2429: 2750: 2742: 2446: 2345:
https://variety.com/2023/film/news/ridley-scott-watched-alien-romulus-great-1235759474/
1200: 1179: 839: 2340:
https://variety.com/2023/film/news/new-alien-movie-plot-synopsis-full-cast-1235542570/
2886: 2714: 2186: 2062: 2048: 2016: 1961: 1942: 1891: 952: 2323: 2258:
https://www.menshealth.com/entertainment/a37417939/alien-movies-chronological-order/
1095: 1074: 1216: 2871: 2848: 2834: 2722: 2671: 2646: 2616: 2586: 2571: 2557: 2513: 2459: 2232: 2216: 2194: 2178: 2133: 2118: 2070: 2056: 2041: 2024: 1987: 1969: 1924: 1899: 1871: 1851: 1811: 237: 2388:
https://www.escapistmagazine.com/no-one-has-any-idea-what-the-alien-franchise-is/
2223:
AvP that treat those films as canon but the alien franchise explicitly does not.
2144:. I would personally be much more likely to refer to it as the fifth film in the 711:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 2312: 2303:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Alien-Film-Franchise-Encyclopedia-Fordham/dp/1803361204
2010: 1954: 1044: 835: 834:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in 699: 2268:
https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a844657/alien-timeline-chronology-prometheus/
504: 479: 2382: 1939: 1800: 1206: 1101: 1034: 929: 689: 683: 655: 577: 2435:
https://www.gamesradar.com/entertainment/sci-fi-movies/alien-movies-in-order/
2625:
as a film alone makes it clear its not part of the series, as discussed in "
2409:
https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/film-and-tv-reviews/alien-movies-in-order
2308:
https://www.slashfilm.com/1591160/alien-movie-franchise-correct-order-watch/
1951: 1839:
because it was assumed to be obvious (actually it isn't, on first viewing).
822: 801: 2247: 1105: 951:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 728: 2288:
https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/movies/alien-franchise-future-101631305.html
2420:
https://www.cgmagonline.com/articles/features/ranking-alien-franchise/
1935:
isn't a reliable source, but we are linking to it. A bunch of sources
2158:
to "It is the fifth main film and seventh installment overall in the
2350:
https://www.audible.co.uk/blog/the-alien-saga-in-chronological-order
2293:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/please-stop-making-alien-movies/
2029:
Even the official boxset doesn't consider them genuine installments
1210: 2283:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/17/movies/alien-movies-ranked.html
1229: 2858:
would be a question for WT:FILM. If we were to deviate from this
2273:
https://ew.com/how-to-watch-all-the-alien-movies-in-order-8694293
2677:
I'd like make a couple of points based on the discussion above.
2627:
The (Im)Perfect Organism: Dissecting the Alien Media Franchise
1795: 1285: 442: 239: 15: 2425:
https://www.loudersound.com/features/ranking-every-alien-film
1025: 772: 752: 2394:
https://www.thewrap.com/alien-movies-in-order-how-to-watch/
2903:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
2484:
films. And, of course, it is a widely known fact that the
2440:
https://www.fangoria.com/where-to-watch-every-alien-movie/
2335:
https://www.cbr.com/alien-vs-predator-non-canon-explained/
2319:
https://time.com/7010555/alien-romulus-franchise-timeline/
2085:
Just to weight in on this we might be putting unnecessary
2253:
https://alienanthology.fandom.com/Alien_Universe_Timeline
2923:
FA-Class 20th Century Studios articles of Mid-importance
2793:
films are explicitly not part of the same continuity as
2621:
I didn't say it's a majority rule. I'm not sure how the
291:
This article appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as
2862:, someone will most likely come along and add it back. 2859: 2404:
https://www.space.com/alien-movies-ranked-worst-to-best
2352:(scott says they're not part of the official franchise) 2155: 1886: 397: 378: 359: 340: 321: 2473:
films were listed as part of the franchise. There are
2361:
https://screenrant.com/alien-movie-timeline-explained/
1905:
It already has a qualifier, "fifth installment in the
160: 2898:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
2430:
https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/alien-movies-ranked/
1960:
as-is wording seems inaccurate or at best ambiguous.
1842:
We'd need a source - a published review - obviously.
2741:(i.e. series), but also the 14th installment in the 1228:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1123:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 599:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 174: 2480:available for purchase, none of which include the 2988:FA-Class United States articles of Low-importance 2825:(all of which acknowledge/reference each other). 2324:https://www.odeon.co.uk/odeon-scene/alien-movies/ 613:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject 20th Century Studios 514:, a project which is currently considered to be 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 727:. To improve this article, please refer to the 2109:described as the film as a series as a whole. 2758:series, but also the 25th installment in the 2754:is the fifth installment in the Daniel Craig 2313:https://www.cbr.com/alien-franchise-in-order/ 1053:WikiProject Film - American cinema task force 8: 2918:Mid-importance 20th Century Studios articles 275:. Even so, if you can update or improve it, 271:as one of the best articles produced by the 265:; it (or a previous version of it) has been 2383:https://movieweb.com/alien-movies-in-order/ 2199:I thought it was well-established that the 1137:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Science Fiction 1308: 1297: 1174: 1069: 891: 796: 723:. To use this banner, please refer to the 650: 545: 474: 300: 247: 2928:WikiProject 20th Century Studios articles 992:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 616:Template:WikiProject 20th Century Studios 2248:https://avp.fandom.com/Alien_(franchise) 446: 3008:Mid-importance science fiction articles 2993:Mid-importance American cinema articles 2860:fairly widespread/ubiquitous convention 1176: 1071: 893: 848:to talk over new ideas and suggestions. 798: 652: 547: 476: 2913:FA-Class 20th Century Studios articles 2983:Low-importance United States articles 2416:calls Romulus the seventh installment 7: 3013:WikiProject Science Fiction articles 2154:films." I see that the sentence was 1222:This article is within the scope of 1140:Template:WikiProject Science Fiction 1117:This article is within the scope of 945:This article is within the scope of 828:This article is within the scope of 705:This article is within the scope of 593:This article is within the scope of 510:This article is within the scope of 2953:American cinema task force articles 2469:was taken down, only the six canon 465:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 2998:WikiProject United States articles 2943:British cinema task force articles 995:Template:WikiProject United States 854:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Horror 14: 3003:FA-Class science fiction articles 2948:FA-Class American cinema articles 2893:Knowledge (XXG) featured articles 2771:is the fourth installment in the 2607:films. It's not "majority rule". 1242:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject 2010s 781:This article is supported by the 761:This article is supported by the 526:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Alien 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 2938:FA-Class British cinema articles 2778:, but also the 23rd film in the 1799: 1289: 1209: 1199: 1178: 1104: 1094: 1073: 1037: 932: 922: 895: 821: 800: 737:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film 721:regional and topical task forces 692: 682: 654: 596:WikiProject 20th Century Studios 580: 570: 549: 503: 478: 447: 284: 251: 221: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2978:FA-Class United States articles 2968:High-importance horror articles 2599:is not part of the series. The 1262:This article has been rated as 1157:This article has been rated as 1012:This article has been rated as 874:This article has been rated as 633:This article has been rated as 2872:21:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 2849:18:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 2835:16:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 2723:11:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 2672:06:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 1885:. I saw your recent reversion 1877:Fifth or seventh in franchise? 1: 3023:Low-importance 2010s articles 2734:is the second installment in 2647:20:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 2617:16:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 2587:12:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 2572:08:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 2558:01:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 2514:22:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 2460:21:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 2233:11:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 2217:05:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 1872:06:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC) 1236:and see a list of open tasks. 1131:and see a list of open tasks. 1050:This article is supported by 619:20th Century Studios articles 607:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2908:Old requests for peer review 2973:WikiProject Horror articles 2203:films weren't canon to the 2195:09:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 2179:07:47, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 2134:22:26, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 2119:19:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 2071:12:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 2057:12:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 2042:12:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 2025:12:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 1988:11:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 1970:10:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 1925:11:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 1900:07:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 1852:08:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC) 1120:WikiProject Science Fiction 857:Template:WikiProject Horror 588:20th Century Studios portal 3044: 3028:WikiProject 2010s articles 1245:Template:WikiProject 2010s 1163:project's importance scale 1112:Speculative fiction portal 1018:project's importance scale 880:project's importance scale 845:general Project discussion 784:American cinema task force 639:project's importance scale 529:Template:WikiProject Alien 386:Featured article candidate 367:Featured article candidate 2958:WikiProject Film articles 2780:Marvel Cinematic Universe 1915:is a separate franchise. 1261: 1194: 1156: 1089: 1033: 1011: 948:WikiProject United States 917: 873: 816: 780: 764:British cinema task force 760: 740:Template:WikiProject Film 677: 632: 565: 498: 473: 429: 303: 299: 273:Knowledge (XXG) community 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2963:FA-Class horror articles 2390:(Prometheus retcons AvP) 1857:Closing sentence in plot 1143:science fiction articles 953:United States of America 293:Today's featured article 3018:FA-Class 2010s articles 2488:films are not canon to 2478:Blu-ray/DVD collections 2933:FA-Class film articles 2691:My takeaway away from 1813:Prometheus (2012 film) 1312:Prometheus (2012 film) 1030: 998:United States articles 777: 757: 455:This article is rated 259:Prometheus (2012 film) 75:avoid personal attacks 25:Prometheus (2012 film) 2315:(calls AvP not canon) 2169:say, as noted above. 1029: 776: 756: 459:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 420:Articles for deletion 329:Articles for deletion 215:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 2603:did not include the 2467:the official website 940:United States portal 610:20th Century Studios 601:20th Century Studios 557:20th Century Studios 348:Good article nominee 105:No original research 1315: 966:Articles Requested! 713:join the discussion 295:on August 26, 2016. 2807:Alien Resurrection 2693:Darkwarriorblake's 2242:doesnt include AVP 2201:Alien vs. Predator 2151:Alien vs. Predator 1932:the table of films 1912:Alien vs. Predator 1678:Critical reception 1309: 1031: 831:WikiProject Horror 778: 758: 461:content assessment 341:September 12, 2012 304:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 2768:Avengers: Endgame 1977:WikiProject: Film 1826:Worms and Genesis 1823: 1822: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1788: 1785: 1784: 1519:Sets and vehicles 1310:Section size for 1282: 1281: 1278: 1277: 1274: 1273: 1225:WikiProject 2010s 1173: 1172: 1169: 1168: 1068: 1067: 1064: 1063: 890: 889: 886: 885: 795: 794: 791: 790: 715:and see lists of 649: 648: 645: 644: 544: 543: 540: 539: 512:WikiProject Alien 441: 440: 437: 436: 246: 245: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3035: 2841:Darkwarriorblake 2601:official website 2593:films themselves 2564:Darkwarriorblake 2525: 2522:Darkwarriorblake 2452:Darkwarriorblake 2367:does include AVP 2225:Darkwarriorblake 2126:Darkwarriorblake 2034:Darkwarriorblake 1980:Darkwarriorblake 1917:Darkwarriorblake 1883:Darkwarriorblake 1817: 1803: 1796: 1751: 1736: 1695: 1680: 1652: 1637: 1622: 1594: 1566: 1551: 1536: 1534:Creature effects 1521: 1506: 1478: 1463: 1448: 1433: 1418: 1403: 1316: 1298: 1293: 1292: 1286: 1268:importance scale 1250: 1249: 1246: 1243: 1240: 1219: 1214: 1213: 1203: 1196: 1195: 1190: 1182: 1175: 1145: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1135: 1114: 1109: 1108: 1098: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1077: 1070: 1047: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1000: 999: 996: 993: 990: 942: 937: 936: 935: 926: 919: 918: 913: 910: 899: 892: 862: 861: 858: 855: 852: 825: 818: 817: 812: 804: 797: 745: 744: 741: 738: 735: 708:WikiProject Film 702: 697: 696: 695: 686: 679: 678: 673: 658: 651: 621: 620: 617: 614: 611: 590: 585: 584: 583: 574: 567: 566: 561: 553: 546: 534: 533: 530: 527: 524: 507: 500: 499: 494: 482: 475: 458: 452: 451: 443: 432:Featured article 430:Current status: 400: 381: 362: 360:January 16, 2013 343: 324: 322:February 8, 2011 301: 288: 263:featured article 255: 248: 240: 226: 225: 216: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3043: 3042: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3034: 3033: 3032: 2883: 2882: 2815:Alien: Covenant 2737:The Dark Knight 2731:The Dark Knight 2542:The Independent 2519: 2140:Came here from 1879: 1859: 1828: 1810: 1790: 1747: 1732: 1691: 1676: 1648: 1633: 1618: 1590: 1562: 1547: 1532: 1517: 1502: 1474: 1461:Post-production 1459: 1444: 1429: 1414: 1399: 1303: 1290: 1247: 1244: 1241: 1238: 1237: 1215: 1208: 1188: 1142: 1139: 1136: 1134:Science Fiction 1133: 1132: 1125:science fiction 1110: 1103: 1083: 1081:Science Fiction 1043: 1038: 1036: 997: 994: 991: 988: 987: 986: 972:Become a Member 938: 933: 931: 911: 905: 876:High-importance 860:horror articles 859: 856: 853: 850: 849: 811:High‑importance 810: 742: 739: 736: 733: 732: 698: 693: 691: 664: 618: 615: 612: 609: 608: 586: 581: 579: 559: 531: 528: 525: 522: 521: 488: 456: 396: 377: 358: 339: 320: 242: 241: 236: 213: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3041: 3039: 3031: 3030: 3025: 3020: 3015: 3010: 3005: 3000: 2995: 2990: 2985: 2980: 2975: 2970: 2965: 2960: 2955: 2950: 2945: 2940: 2935: 2930: 2925: 2920: 2915: 2910: 2905: 2900: 2895: 2885: 2884: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2819:Alien: Romulus 2751:No Time to Die 2746:film franchise 2710: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2689: 2685: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2602: 2595:make it clear 2594: 2447:Alien: Romulus 2443: 2442: 2437: 2432: 2427: 2422: 2417: 2411: 2406: 2401: 2396: 2391: 2385: 2380: 2375: 2369: 2368: 2364: 2363: 2358: 2353: 2347: 2342: 2337: 2332: 2326: 2321: 2316: 2310: 2305: 2300: 2295: 2290: 2285: 2280: 2275: 2270: 2265: 2260: 2255: 2250: 2244: 2243: 2236: 2235: 2182: 2181: 2167:WP:BESTSOURCES 2138: 2137: 2136: 2106: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2059: 2013: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2001: 1994: 1957: 1878: 1875: 1858: 1855: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1804: 1792: 1791: 1787: 1786: 1783: 1782: 1779: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1768: 1765: 1763:External links 1759: 1758: 1755: 1752: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1722: 1716: 1715: 1712: 1709: 1703: 1702: 1699: 1696: 1688: 1687: 1684: 1681: 1673: 1672: 1669: 1666: 1660: 1659: 1656: 1653: 1645: 1644: 1641: 1638: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1623: 1615: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1602: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1592:Viral campaign 1587: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1567: 1564:Visual effects 1559: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1544: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1529: 1528: 1525: 1522: 1514: 1513: 1510: 1507: 1504:Costume design 1499: 1498: 1495: 1492: 1486: 1485: 1482: 1479: 1471: 1470: 1467: 1464: 1456: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1441: 1440: 1437: 1434: 1431:Pre-production 1426: 1425: 1422: 1419: 1411: 1410: 1407: 1404: 1396: 1395: 1392: 1389: 1383: 1382: 1379: 1376: 1370: 1369: 1366: 1363: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1350: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1337: 1331: 1330: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1320: 1314:(31 sections) 1305: 1304: 1301: 1296: 1294: 1280: 1279: 1276: 1275: 1272: 1271: 1264:Low-importance 1260: 1254: 1253: 1251: 1248:2010s articles 1234:the discussion 1221: 1220: 1204: 1192: 1191: 1189:Low‑importance 1183: 1171: 1170: 1167: 1166: 1159:Mid-importance 1155: 1149: 1148: 1146: 1129:the discussion 1116: 1115: 1099: 1087: 1086: 1084:Mid‑importance 1078: 1066: 1065: 1062: 1061: 1058:Mid-importance 1049: 1048: 1032: 1022: 1021: 1014:Low-importance 1010: 1004: 1003: 1001: 985: 984: 979: 974: 969: 962: 960:Template Usage 956: 944: 943: 927: 915: 914: 912:Low‑importance 900: 888: 887: 884: 883: 872: 866: 865: 863: 826: 814: 813: 805: 793: 792: 789: 788: 779: 769: 768: 759: 749: 748: 746: 704: 703: 687: 675: 674: 659: 647: 646: 643: 642: 635:Mid-importance 631: 625: 624: 622: 605:the discussion 592: 591: 575: 563: 562: 560:Mid‑importance 554: 542: 541: 538: 537: 535: 532:Alien articles 508: 496: 495: 483: 471: 470: 464: 453: 439: 438: 435: 434: 427: 426: 423: 416: 412: 411: 408: 401: 393: 392: 389: 382: 374: 373: 370: 363: 355: 354: 351: 344: 336: 335: 332: 325: 317: 316: 313: 310: 306: 305: 297: 296: 289: 281: 280: 256: 244: 243: 234: 232: 231: 228: 227: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3040: 3029: 3026: 3024: 3021: 3019: 3016: 3014: 3011: 3009: 3006: 3004: 3001: 2999: 2996: 2994: 2991: 2989: 2986: 2984: 2981: 2979: 2976: 2974: 2971: 2969: 2966: 2964: 2961: 2959: 2956: 2954: 2951: 2949: 2946: 2944: 2941: 2939: 2936: 2934: 2931: 2929: 2926: 2924: 2921: 2919: 2916: 2914: 2911: 2909: 2906: 2904: 2901: 2899: 2896: 2894: 2891: 2890: 2888: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2864:InfiniteNexus 2861: 2857: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2827:InfiniteNexus 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2786: 2781: 2777: 2775: 2770: 2769: 2764: 2762: 2757: 2753: 2752: 2747: 2745: 2740: 2738: 2733: 2732: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2711: 2708: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2683: 2679: 2678: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2664:InfiniteNexus 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2609:InfiniteNexus 2606: 2600: 2598: 2592: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2534: 2529: 2523: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2506:InfiniteNexus 2504: 2502: 2500: 2498: 2496:the seventh: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2477: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2448: 2441: 2438: 2436: 2433: 2431: 2428: 2426: 2423: 2421: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2410: 2407: 2405: 2402: 2400: 2397: 2395: 2392: 2389: 2386: 2384: 2381: 2379: 2376: 2374: 2371: 2370: 2366: 2365: 2362: 2359: 2357: 2354: 2351: 2348: 2346: 2343: 2341: 2338: 2336: 2333: 2330: 2327: 2325: 2322: 2320: 2317: 2314: 2311: 2309: 2306: 2304: 2301: 2299: 2296: 2294: 2291: 2289: 2286: 2284: 2281: 2279: 2276: 2274: 2271: 2269: 2266: 2264: 2261: 2259: 2256: 2254: 2251: 2249: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2209:InfiniteNexus 2206: 2202: 2197: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2162: 2157: 2153: 2152: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2011: 2007: 2002: 1999: 1998: 1995: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1978: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1958: 1955: 1952: 1949: 1946: 1943: 1940: 1937: 1933: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1913: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1888: 1884: 1876: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1856: 1854: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1825: 1815: 1814: 1809: 1808: 1805: 1802: 1798: 1797: 1780: 1777: 1774: 1773: 1769: 1766: 1764: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1738: 1735: 1731: 1730: 1726: 1723: 1721: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1710: 1708: 1705: 1704: 1700: 1697: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1682: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1670: 1667: 1665: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1654: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1639: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1627: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1616: 1612: 1609: 1607: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1596: 1593: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1581: 1579: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1568: 1565: 1561: 1560: 1556: 1553: 1550: 1549:Sound effects 1546: 1545: 1541: 1538: 1535: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1523: 1520: 1516: 1515: 1511: 1508: 1505: 1501: 1500: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1480: 1477: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1465: 1462: 1458: 1457: 1453: 1450: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1420: 1417: 1413: 1412: 1408: 1405: 1402: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1390: 1388: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1371: 1367: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1333: 1332: 1326: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1307: 1306: 1302:Section sizes 1300: 1299: 1295: 1288: 1287: 1284: 1269: 1265: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1252: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1218: 1212: 1207: 1205: 1202: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1187: 1184: 1181: 1177: 1164: 1160: 1154: 1151: 1150: 1147: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1113: 1107: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1072: 1059: 1056:(assessed as 1055: 1054: 1046: 1035: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1002: 989:United States 983: 980: 978: 975: 973: 970: 968: 967: 963: 961: 958: 957: 954: 950: 949: 941: 930: 928: 925: 921: 920: 916: 909: 904: 903:United States 901: 898: 894: 881: 877: 871: 868: 867: 864: 847: 846: 841: 837: 833: 832: 827: 824: 820: 819: 815: 809: 806: 803: 799: 786: 785: 775: 771: 770: 766: 765: 755: 751: 750: 747: 743:film articles 730: 726: 725:documentation 722: 718: 714: 710: 709: 701: 690: 688: 685: 681: 680: 676: 672: 668: 663: 660: 657: 653: 640: 636: 630: 627: 626: 623: 606: 602: 598: 597: 589: 578: 576: 573: 569: 568: 564: 558: 555: 552: 548: 536: 519: 518: 513: 509: 506: 502: 501: 497: 492: 487: 484: 481: 477: 472: 468: 462: 454: 450: 445: 444: 433: 428: 425:Speedily kept 424: 422: 421: 417: 414: 413: 409: 407: 406: 402: 399: 398:April 3, 2013 395: 394: 390: 388: 387: 383: 380: 376: 375: 371: 369: 368: 364: 361: 357: 356: 352: 350: 349: 345: 342: 338: 337: 333: 331: 330: 326: 323: 319: 318: 314: 311: 308: 307: 302: 298: 294: 290: 287: 283: 282: 278: 274: 270: 269: 264: 260: 257: 254: 250: 249: 230: 229: 224: 220: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2823:Alien: Earth 2822: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2784: 2773: 2766: 2760: 2755: 2749: 2743: 2736: 2729: 2661: 2639:Andrzejbanas 2634: 2630: 2622: 2604: 2596: 2579:Andrzejbanas 2550:Andrzejbanas 2545: 2541: 2537: 2532: 2527: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2475: 2470: 2444: 2237: 2204: 2200: 2198: 2183: 2160: 2156:just changed 2149: 2145: 2111:Andrzejbanas 2094: 2090: 1910: 1909:franchise", 1906: 1880: 1860: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1812: 1319:Section name 1283: 1263: 1223: 1217:2010s portal 1158: 1118: 1051: 1013: 977:Project Talk 965: 946: 875: 843: 829: 782: 762: 706: 634: 594: 515: 467:WikiProjects 431: 418: 415:June 9, 2020 403: 384: 379:May 31, 2013 372:Not promoted 365: 346: 327: 277:please do so 266: 258: 218: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2856:WP:FANCRUFT 2787:film series 2776:film series 2207:franchise. 1620:Pre-release 1401:Development 1045:Film portal 700:Film portal 405:Peer review 148:free images 31:not a forum 2887:Categories 2811:Prometheus 2789:", as the 2761:James Bond 2756:James Bond 2171:TompaDompa 1844:Paulturtle 1720:References 1650:Home media 1635:Box office 1387:Production 840:literature 729:guidelines 717:open tasks 268:identified 2763:franchise 2704:editing). 2700:solution. 2696:together. 2163:franchise 2103:WP:SIGCOV 2099:WP:WEIGHT 1864:HenryRoan 1734:Citations 1693:Accolades 1664:Reception 1578:Marketing 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2774:Avengers 2715:Scribolt 2682:WP:MFILM 2538:Fangoria 2187:Scribolt 2063:Scribolt 2049:Scribolt 2017:Scribolt 1962:Scribolt 1892:Scribolt 1781:217,264 1749:Journals 1742:122,387 1727:123,445 671:American 517:inactive 491:inactive 457:FA-class 410:Reviewed 391:Promoted 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2803:Alien 3 2739:trilogy 2494:Romulus 2465:Before 2142:WT:FILM 1778:217,264 1739:122,387 1707:Sequels 1671:11,155 1606:Release 1497:13,680 1446:Filming 1416:Writing 1394:22,065 1327:Section 1266:on the 1161:on the 1016:on the 878:on the 667:British 637:on the 312:Process 219:90 days 154:WP refs 142:scholar 2821:, and 2799:Aliens 2744:Batman 2087:weight 1816:, EPEL 1770:3,143 1757:1,043 1714:2,110 1701:4,705 1686:6,435 1658:2,041 1643:3,823 1628:1,764 1613:8,226 1600:4,473 1585:8,811 1572:2,524 1542:4,905 1527:3,328 1512:1,804 1490:Design 1484:1,222 1469:2,587 1454:3,364 1439:1,697 1424:8,266 1409:4,913 1381:5,587 1374:Themes 1368:9,841 1355:4,790 1342:4,411 1329:total 982:Alerts 908:Cinema 851:Horror 808:Horror 463:scale. 353:Listed 315:Result 126:Google 2795:Alien 2785:Alien 2635:Alien 2631:Alien 2533:Alien 2528:Alien 2490:Alien 2476:Alien 2471:Alien 2205:Alien 2161:Alien 2146:Alien 2095:Alien 1907:Alien 1775:Total 1767:3,143 1754:1,043 1711:2,110 1698:4,705 1683:6,435 1655:2,041 1640:3,823 1625:1,764 1597:4,473 1582:4,338 1569:2,524 1539:4,905 1524:3,328 1509:1,804 1481:1,222 1476:Music 1466:2,587 1451:3,364 1436:1,697 1421:8,266 1406:4,913 1378:5,587 1365:9,841 1352:4,790 1339:4,411 1335:(Top) 1324:count 1239:2010s 1230:2010s 1186:2010s 523:Alien 486:Alien 261:is a 191:Index 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2868:talk 2845:talk 2831:talk 2719:talk 2668:talk 2643:talk 2613:talk 2591:The 2583:talk 2568:talk 2554:talk 2546:Time 2510:talk 2456:talk 2229:talk 2213:talk 2191:talk 2175:talk 2130:talk 2115:talk 2101:and 2067:talk 2053:talk 2038:talk 2021:talk 1984:talk 1966:talk 1921:talk 1896:talk 1887:here 1868:talk 1848:talk 1557:592 1361:Cast 1348:Plot 1322:Byte 870:High 836:film 734:Film 719:and 662:Film 334:Kept 309:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2791:AvP 2623:AvP 2605:AvP 2597:AvP 2486:AvP 2482:AvP 1944:), 1881:Hi 1610:598 1554:592 1494:527 1258:Low 1153:Mid 1008:Low 629:Mid 176:TWL 2889:: 2870:) 2847:) 2833:) 2817:, 2813:, 2809:, 2805:, 2801:, 2797:, 2765:; 2748:; 2721:) 2670:) 2645:) 2615:) 2585:) 2570:) 2556:) 2544:, 2540:, 2512:) 2458:) 2231:) 2215:) 2193:) 2177:) 2132:) 2117:) 2069:) 2055:) 2040:) 2023:) 1986:) 1968:) 1953:, 1950:, 1947:, 1941:, 1938:, 1923:) 1898:) 1870:) 1850:) 1724:15 1668:15 1391:16 1060:). 906:: 838:, 669:/ 665:: 217:: 209:, 205:, 201:, 197:, 193:, 156:) 54:; 2866:( 2843:( 2829:( 2717:( 2666:( 2641:( 2611:( 2581:( 2566:( 2552:( 2536:( 2524:: 2520:@ 2508:( 2454:( 2331:. 2227:( 2211:( 2189:( 2173:( 2128:( 2113:( 2105:. 2091:n 2065:( 2051:( 2036:( 2019:( 1982:( 1964:( 1930:( 1919:( 1894:( 1866:( 1846:( 1270:. 1165:. 1020:. 882:. 787:. 767:. 731:. 641:. 520:. 493:) 489:( 469:: 279:. 211:5 207:4 203:3 199:2 195:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Prometheus (2012 film)
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
Index
1
2
3
4
5

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.