449:
581:
925:. Main thing I did is to add page numbers everywhere since the current citation format does not have 'em, and made the article less dependent on newspapers/newsmedia. There is some content in the current article I didn't take over, either because it's unsourced or because the sources seem questionable to me. I'll wait a couple or so of weeks before swapping it in, in case there are objections, since I don't think it's 100% clear that it's better.
617:
219:
509:
482:
278:
440:
397:
326:
519:
1619:
Depends what exactly is meant - "best studied by astronomers" is definitely wrong; "best known to the general public" is plausible, but as said that's hard to determine. I don't think this is important enough to be in the lead section, but since it's cited it could be added to a "cultural impact" or
754:
Wholeheartedly agree, and in fact the previous edit sounds as though the editor her/himself did not understand the difference between transit detections and radial velocity detections. I changed the wording to more accurately reflect the preprint, but the paper may or course be edited after peer and
1454:
I don't think this is that problematic however, as
Frontiers' controversies seem to revolve about somewhat more society-related studies (e.g. HIV, CoViD) than, say, astrophysics (Judging by a quick look into the Wiki page). Some of the authors also appear to have helped somewhat "reputable" studies
1367:
Sorry to be a pain, but I still don't understand the sentence. In my reading it can mean either: "From the planet
Proxima Centauri b, the red dwarf star Proxima Centauri ..." Or From the planet Proxima Centauri b, the binary stars Alpha Centauri AB ..". I think if you add "the binary stars of Alpha
731:
The added wording makes it sound as if the study concludes that the entire detection was the result of correlated noise (i.e. that
Proxima Centauri b may not exist at all). However, reading the paper referred to, they don't seem to conclude this at all. Rather, they conclude that the planet simply
732:
does not transit, and explain reports of transits following the initial detection (which was made using radial velocity measurements) as correlated noise. Nothing in the paper seems to refute the original RV detection at all. As written, the addition to the article here seems grossly misleading.
727:
Earlier in May 2019, a user edited the introduction to add the following: "In May 2019, a paper published on the astrophysics preprint-arxiv presenting recent
Spitzer Space Telescope observations put doubt on the initial detection, finding no transits, and attributing the initial detection to
631:
1538:
1324:
I think that most people won't care about the distinction star-star system. In my experience, when you are talking about a star system you aren't part of star and star system aren't distinguished. If you are part of the system then you do distinguish (Sun vs. Solar System)
851:
Back in 2012, there was some weak evidence found for a possible planet orbiting around
Proxima Centauri at 5.6 days, half the later confirmed 11.2 days. But, I think it was discovered by Anglada-Escudé et al and published in the The Astrophysical Journal. see -
1765:
1100:
thanks for your work on this article. I'm the original reviewer that passed this article in its previous review. I'm happy to take a look this again for the reassessment if that would be desirable. I'll likely be able to put some time in this weekend.
880:
Partly as a corollary to the above, it's usually much easier to write new text from scratch & replace the current text from scratch than to add page numbers to already existing sourced text. I am not sure what people's considerations are on
876:
Currently the article does use references w/o indicating specific page numbers for particular claims. In my experience FA usually expects page numbers when the source is more than a few pages long. So a rewrite would imply adding lots of page
1223:
Proxima
Centauri b receives about 10-60 times as much of this radiation as Earth with a particular increase in the X-rays and might have received even more in the past, adding up to 7-16 times as much cumulative XUV radiation than Earth -:
1280:
I don't understand: "From
Proxima Centauri b, Alpha Centauri would be considerably brighter than Venus is from Earth". Proxima Centauri b is a part of Alpha Centauri, so comparing it with Venus/Earth makes little sense I would think.
1076:
and there are later edits too. I should have done this GAR earlier, since the article is now completely different from the time at which it passed GAN I think the new version should be checked against the GA criteria.
153:
655:
then what the early Earth was subjected to (about 3.8 Ga), and life was able to originate under these conditions. I think it could be helpful if we incoperate this study into the article but not make it too OR.
1309:
Hmm.. I was just going off wikilinks here, having no prior knowledge. Googling "alpha centauri" leads only to pages about the star system, rather than an individual star. Could you clarify which star is meant?
1735:
681:, the actual study. I haven't had time to go over it in detail, but I'm skeptical - the concern I've seen about flares has been about stripping atmospheres from planets, rather than the radiation per se.
1455:
about other exoplanets (e.g. TOI-1338b and TESS planets), which, at least I personally think, should make the source more of a non-issue. Should I perhaps add, or even replace the source with this one (
453:
739:
972:
384:
651:
was released regarding the possibility of some of the closest exoplanets supporting life. In a nutshell, they basically say that the radiation that is received by the exoplanets is actually
1725:
1695:
1690:
1755:
1740:
571:
147:
1760:
413:
590:
492:
79:
1720:
1025:
289:
1750:
561:
44:
1710:
1353:
I don't think that would make it any clearer, and we are talking about the planet not the star. And the convention above is also used in lay sources.
1730:
1021:
872:
Now unlike other articles I've brought from stub or redlink to FA this one is already fairly well-developed, so I am going to discuss a few things:
85:
1705:
1006:
307:
1590:
1745:
1656:
I think there is room for that, and also “best-known” without context as it was before is vague so that’s probably what the intention was.
30:
755:
before publication, and anyway this statement might be more appropriate in another section. If anyone thinks so, please move it. Be bold!
626:
998:
887:
Is there an established "best practice" on how to balance sources that rely on computer simulation with these that rely on observations?
814:
785:
1700:
743:
699:
True but I think they mention something about that I’m not sure. Should look at it more in-depth before we make the jump with this. --
532:
487:
295:
99:
1666:
709:
666:
190:
104:
20:
1715:
168:
1339:
I assume you're right, but what's the harm in changing it to "Proxima
Centauri" for those who are unaware of such a convention?
74:
135:
462:
1464:
65:
984:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
884:
It seems like astronomy articles often use databases as sources; is there a list of such sources that could/should be used?
1415:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1061:
260:
1046:
369:
350:
256:
1205:
Listified this sentence; I don't think an arbitrary split works from a good writing perspective but it is overlong.
129:
185:
1537:
Is
Proxima Centauri b the best known exoplanet, even compared with the 51 Pegasi one or TRAPPIST-1? As claimed in
109:
1594:
1514:
1428:: I originally considered using this source but decided against it because other sources say the same thing and
199:
1475:
1460:
1435:
125:
468:
789:
1647:
1578:
1545:
1503:
1479:
1445:
1387:
1358:
1330:
1300:
1252:
1233:
1210:
1191:
1142:
1122:
1082:
1057:
959:
945:
930:
907:
817:
1589:
Of course not. Whoever added that line does not know about exoplanets, or how to write, or both. Removing.
781:
735:
1625:
1244:(I don't think it's a GA criteria, but the diagrams section could be better integrated into the article).
175:
648:
264:
55:
1608:
1560:
1373:
1344:
1315:
1286:
1270:
1154:. Article is in a good shape, everything is cited, no cleanup templates. If it looks like GA, it is GA.
277:
70:
898:; I want to split the work so that it's not too much at once. This question is a repost of the one on
895:
760:
407:
299:
1603:
Reverted. 2/3rds of editors supported it's addition. Do not remove until a new consensus is formed
595:
161:
255:
is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
1643:
1574:
1541:
1499:
1495:
1441:
1383:
1354:
1326:
1296:
1248:
1229:
1206:
1187:
1138:
1118:
1095:
1078:
991:
955:
941:
926:
903:
809:
204:
24:
853:
141:
580:
396:
325:
1621:
1159:
838:
828:
688:
616:
51:
1659:
1639:
1604:
1556:
1369:
1340:
1311:
1282:
1266:
1134:
1105:
804:
800:
702:
678:
659:
524:
218:
201:
954:
I forgot that thi article is tagged as a GA - will need to re-review it after the rewrite.
890:
Should topics like planetary atmospheres be discussed in a dedicated header, or per planet?
1570:
1522:
1429:
899:
756:
231:
227:
1295:
I would think most people will read "Alpha
Centauri" as the star, not the entire system.
1684:
1155:
869:
I've been thinking for a while about trying to bring this article up to FA status.
832:
682:
1176:. Very close to GA, but there are a few places where the prose is not quite clear
1555:
Most famous exoplanet is hard to determine. I think it's okay to keep that claim
622:
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
1766:
Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
1102:
1518:
866:
776:
514:
203:
1671:
1651:
1629:
1612:
1598:
1582:
1564:
1549:
1526:
1507:
1483:
1468:
1449:
1391:
1377:
1362:
1348:
1334:
1319:
1304:
1290:
1274:
1256:
1237:
1214:
1195:
1163:
1146:
1126:
1108:
1086:
1065:
963:
949:
934:
911:
844:
822:
793:
764:
747:
714:
694:
671:
537:
508:
481:
401:
894:
Note that I am purposefully planning to do this before the launch of the
1642:
I kind of worry that the source does not say "to the general public"
400:
A news item involving this article was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1225:
can be split too. The mid-sentence cites make it difficult to parse
1456:
1202:
The additional factors sentence could be split in two/three/four
940:
OK, I am taking silence as assent and have put in the rewrite.
611:
433:
213:
205:
15:
1420:
Regarding the source for Proxima Centauri b not transiting...
854:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/15
579:
1736:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
677:
If anyone does anything with this, the reference to use is
1474:
These are reasonable arguments. I'll withdraw my concern.
723:
Mention of May 2019 preprint arxiv paper in introduction
1635:
1425:
1179:
The paragraph starting with "Climate models including"
1073:
1041:
1033:
1002:
922:
362:
831:
documents that observation and subsequent refutation.
160:
1182:"Planets partially or wholly covered with ice" -: -->
1459:), that basically concludes the same as you said ?
1726:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Physical sciences
174:
1696:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use British English
1691:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use Oxford spelling
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1183:I thought the article is about a single planet
856:(In the paper at "4.1. Proxima, a Flaring M4V")
305:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
1756:GA-Class Astronomy articles of Mid-importance
775:Then what this 2012 Nature article is about?
8:
1741:GA-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
1137:someone else will have to do the re-review.
594:, which collaborates on articles related to
536:, which collaborates on articles related to
777:https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11572
643:New study regarding life-supporting chances
779:
733:
476:
319:
272:
1432:has a somewhat dodgy reputation. Pinging
1074:installed a major rewrite of this article
861:Ideas and questions on a future expansion
740:2600:8803:B600:7310:CD67:365B:B49E:B060
478:
1761:GA-Class Astronomical objects articles
1721:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
546:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Astronomy
263:, this should not be changed without
7:
1711:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles
980:The following discussion is closed.
530:This article is within the scope of
439:
437:
921:I've written up a proposed rewrite
467:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1368:Centauri", the AB can be omitted.
14:
1751:Mid-importance Astronomy articles
1247:Restructured the image use here.
298:. If you can improve it further,
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1457:https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.01336
1411:The discussion above is closed.
615:
591:WikiProject Astronomical objects
517:
507:
480:
447:
438:
395:
324:
276:
217:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1731:GA-Class level-5 vital articles
1042:Watch article reassessment page
566:This article has been rated as
1706:Natural sciences good articles
549:Template:WikiProject Astronomy
290:Natural sciences good articles
286:has been listed as one of the
1:
1701:Knowledge (XXG) good articles
1583:14:49, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
1569:I see that this shows in the
1565:13:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
1527:21:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
1508:21:23, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
1127:11:52, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
1109:11:36, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
1087:10:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
1066:06:23, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
964:10:35, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
935:13:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
912:19:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
588:This article is supported by
42:Put new text under old text.
1672:18:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
1652:09:11, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
1630:18:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
1613:18:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
1599:18:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
1573:as well. I'll integrate it.
1550:16:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
1484:21:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
1469:16:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
1450:16:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
1147:17:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
950:16:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
845:17:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
823:16:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
794:19:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
1746:GA-Class Astronomy articles
1782:
1382:Put a variant of that in.
1164:16:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
715:03:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
695:02:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
672:01:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
572:project's importance scale
1392:09:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
1378:08:56, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
1363:08:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
1349:08:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
1335:09:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
1320:17:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
1305:17:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
1291:16:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
1275:19:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
1257:11:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
1238:11:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
1215:11:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
1196:11:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
587:
565:
502:
475:
420:
394:
385:Good article reassessment
322:
318:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1413:Please do not modify it.
982:Please do not modify it.
765:00:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
748:20:18, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
1716:GA-Class vital articles
1072:So, a few weeks ago I
584:
75:avoid personal attacks
583:
533:WikiProject Astronomy
461:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
454:level-5 vital article
296:good article criteria
100:Neutral point of view
1498:confirmed to exist?
1461:Sir Proxima Centauri
1436:Sir Proxima Centauri
896:James Webb Telescope
596:astronomical objects
493:Astronomical objects
370:Good article nominee
351:Good article nominee
261:relevant style guide
257:varieties of English
105:No original research
1476:JoJo Eumerus mobile
771:Discovered in 2016?
728:correlated noise."
540:on Knowledge (XXG).
259:. According to the
1496:Proxima Centauri d
1490:Proxima Centauri d
1058:Extraordinary Writ
1047:Most recent review
983:
973:Proxima Centauri b
647:So recently a new
585:
552:Astronomy articles
463:content assessment
330:Article milestones
284:Proxima Centauri b
86:dispute resolution
47:
25:Proxima Centauri b
1620:similar section.
1117:that could work.
981:
829:Alpha Centauri Bb
796:
784:comment added by
750:
738:comment added by
640:
639:
610:
609:
606:
605:
602:
601:
432:
431:
428:
427:
380:September 7, 2022
363:February 26, 2017
314:
271:
270:
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1773:
1439:
1099:
1056:
1044:
1038:
1029:
1010:
841:
820:
812:
805:Proxima Centauri
801:Alpha Centauri B
691:
619:
612:
554:
553:
550:
547:
544:
527:
525:Astronomy portal
522:
521:
520:
511:
504:
503:
498:
495:
484:
477:
460:
451:
450:
443:
442:
441:
434:
421:Current status:
399:
365:
346:November 5, 2016
329:
328:
320:
303:
280:
273:
224:This article is
221:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1781:
1780:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1681:
1680:
1669:
1591:209.194.208.148
1535:
1513:Yep! Published
1492:
1433:
1430:Frontiers Media
1422:
1417:
1416:
1093:
1051:
1040:
1019:
996:
990:
986:
976:
919:
902:if it matters.
900:Talk:TRAPPIST-1
863:
839:
816:
810:
773:
725:
712:
689:
669:
645:
551:
548:
545:
542:
541:
523:
518:
516:
496:
490:
458:
448:
414:August 24, 2016
361:
323:
265:broad consensus
232:Oxford spelling
228:British English
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1779:
1777:
1769:
1768:
1763:
1758:
1753:
1748:
1743:
1738:
1733:
1728:
1723:
1718:
1713:
1708:
1703:
1698:
1693:
1683:
1682:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1665:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1571:reader numbers
1534:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1515:just last week
1491:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1421:
1418:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1228:Rewrote this.
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1166:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1116:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1049:
987:
978:
977:
975:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
918:
915:
892:
891:
888:
885:
882:
878:
865:So, like with
862:
859:
858:
857:
849:
848:
847:
827:Specifically,
772:
769:
768:
767:
724:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
708:
665:
644:
641:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
629:
627:Google Scholar
623:
620:
608:
607:
604:
603:
600:
599:
586:
576:
575:
568:Mid-importance
564:
558:
557:
555:
529:
528:
512:
500:
499:
497:Mid‑importance
485:
473:
472:
466:
444:
430:
429:
426:
425:
418:
417:
392:
391:
388:
381:
377:
376:
373:
366:
358:
357:
354:
347:
343:
342:
339:
336:
332:
331:
316:
315:
281:
269:
268:
222:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1778:
1767:
1764:
1762:
1759:
1757:
1754:
1752:
1749:
1747:
1744:
1742:
1739:
1737:
1734:
1732:
1729:
1727:
1724:
1722:
1719:
1717:
1714:
1712:
1709:
1707:
1704:
1702:
1699:
1697:
1694:
1692:
1689:
1688:
1686:
1673:
1668:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1644:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1641:
1637:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1575:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1572:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1542:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1540:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1500:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1497:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1452:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1442:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1437:
1431:
1427:
1419:
1414:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1384:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1381:
1380:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1355:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1352:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1327:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1323:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1297:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1294:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1249:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1246:
1245:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1230:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1227:
1226:
1222:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1207:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1204:
1203:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1188:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1185:
1184:
1181:
1180:
1178:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1139:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1136:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1119:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1114:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1104:
1097:
1096:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1079:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1075:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1054:
1050:
1048:
1043:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1027:
1023:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1008:
1004:
1000:
995:
994:
989:
988:
985:
974:
971:
965:
961:
957:
956:Jo-Jo Eumerus
953:
952:
951:
947:
943:
942:Jo-Jo Eumerus
939:
938:
937:
936:
932:
928:
927:Jo-Jo Eumerus
924:
917:Rewrite is up
916:
914:
913:
909:
905:
904:Jo-Jo Eumerus
901:
897:
889:
886:
883:
879:
875:
874:
873:
870:
868:
860:
855:
850:
846:
842:
836:
835:
830:
826:
825:
824:
821:
819:
815:
813:
806:
802:
799:
798:
797:
795:
791:
787:
786:95.84.178.156
783:
778:
770:
766:
762:
758:
753:
752:
751:
749:
745:
741:
737:
729:
722:
716:
711:
706:
705:
704:
698:
697:
696:
692:
686:
685:
680:
676:
675:
674:
673:
668:
663:
662:
661:
654:
650:
642:
633:
630:
628:
625:
624:
621:
618:
614:
613:
597:
593:
592:
582:
578:
577:
573:
569:
563:
560:
559:
556:
539:
535:
534:
526:
515:
513:
510:
506:
505:
501:
494:
489:
486:
483:
479:
474:
470:
464:
456:
455:
445:
436:
435:
424:
419:
415:
411:
409:
403:
398:
393:
389:
387:
386:
382:
379:
378:
374:
372:
371:
367:
364:
360:
359:
355:
353:
352:
348:
345:
344:
340:
337:
334:
333:
327:
321:
317:
312:
310:
309:
301:
297:
293:
292:
291:
285:
282:
279:
275:
274:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
233:
229:
223:
220:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1658:
1657:
1622:SevenSpheres
1536:
1533:Most famous?
1493:
1453:
1424:...added in
1423:
1412:
1265:
1173:
1169:
1168:
1151:
1071:
1052:
1034:
1030:
1016:Article talk
1015:
1014:
1011:
992:
979:
920:
893:
871:
864:
833:
808:
780:— Preceding
774:
734:— Preceding
730:
726:
701:
700:
683:
658:
657:
652:
646:
589:
567:
531:
469:WikiProjects
452:
423:Good article
422:
405:
383:
368:
349:
306:
304:
300:please do so
288:
287:
283:
252:
251:; note that
248:
245:organization
244:
240:
236:
225:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1660:MarioProtIV
1640:MarioProtIV
1605:Redacted II
1557:Redacted II
1539:this source
1003:visual edit
703:MarioProtIV
660:MarioProtIV
408:In the news
226:written in
148:free images
31:not a forum
1685:Categories
1634:Regarding
867:TRAPPIST-1
757:Illexsquid
412:column on
356:Not listed
294:under the
1636:this edit
1480:main talk
1426:this edit
1133:Going by
543:Astronomy
538:Astronomy
488:Astronomy
457:is rated
402:Main Page
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1667:contribs
1103:♫CheChe♫
877:numbers.
782:unsigned
736:unsigned
710:contribs
667:contribs
459:GA-class
308:reassess
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1186:Fixed.
1170:Comment
1156:Artem.G
1055:: Kept.
1026:history
1007:history
993:Article
840:discuss
834:Tarl N.
811:Serendi
690:discuss
684:Tarl N.
570:on the
404:in the
338:Process
249:analyse
241:realize
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1519:Shadow
1053:Result
803:, not
632:Google
465:scale.
375:Listed
341:Result
237:colour
126:Google
1370:Femke
1341:Femke
1312:Femke
1283:Femke
1267:Femke
1115:think
1035:Watch
881:this.
649:study
446:This
230:with
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1648:talk
1626:talk
1609:talk
1595:talk
1579:talk
1561:talk
1546:talk
1523:talk
1517:! --
1504:talk
1465:talk
1446:talk
1388:talk
1374:talk
1359:talk
1345:talk
1331:talk
1316:talk
1301:talk
1287:talk
1271:talk
1253:talk
1234:talk
1211:talk
1192:talk
1174:Keep
1160:talk
1152:Keep
1143:talk
1135:this
1123:talk
1106:talk
1083:talk
1062:talk
1022:edit
999:edit
960:talk
946:talk
931:talk
923:here
908:talk
790:talk
761:talk
744:talk
679:this
653:less
390:Kept
335:Date
253:-ize
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1638:by
1494:Is
1224:-->
1092:Hi
818:ous
562:Mid
176:TWL
1687::
1670:)
1664:(/
1650:)
1628:)
1611:)
1597:)
1581:)
1563:)
1548:)
1525:)
1506:)
1482:)
1467:)
1448:)
1440:.
1390:)
1376:)
1361:)
1347:)
1333:)
1318:)
1303:)
1289:)
1273:)
1255:)
1236:)
1213:)
1194:)
1162:)
1145:)
1125:)
1113:I
1085:)
1064:)
1045:•
1039:•
1024:|
1005:|
1001:|
962:)
948:)
933:)
910:)
843:)
807:.
792:)
763:)
746:)
713:)
707:(/
693:)
670:)
664:(/
656:--
491::
311:it
302:.
247:,
243:,
239:,
156:)
54:;
1646:(
1624:(
1607:(
1593:(
1577:(
1559:(
1544:(
1521:(
1502:(
1478:(
1463:(
1444:(
1438::
1434:@
1386:(
1372:(
1357:(
1343:(
1329:(
1314:(
1299:(
1285:(
1269:(
1251:(
1232:(
1209:(
1190:(
1158:(
1141:(
1121:(
1098::
1094:@
1081:(
1060:(
1031:·
1028:)
1020:(
1012:·
1009:)
997:(
958:(
944:(
929:(
906:(
837:(
788:(
759:(
742:(
687:(
598:.
574:.
471::
416:.
410:"
406:"
313:.
267:.
235:(
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
