Knowledge

Talk:Pterodactylus

Source đź“ť

1268: 438: 310: 174: 2313: 244: 807:
frequency. His revision of the genus Pterodactylus shows that the German Pterodactylus is represented by only one species. He originally considered Germanodactylus, a similar pterodactylid, to be a species of Pterodactylus (as P. sp.), but later (2006) showed Germanodactylus to be distinct from Pterodactylus. Jouve (2004) concluded that Diopecephalus is related to Pterodactylus. The revised synonymy of the German Pterodactylus (modified from
369: 1835:"A P. antiquus specimen (AMNH 1942) showing muscle impressions" - the tiny image makes it impossible to see these, even if the reader knows what to look for. Perhaps a) make the thumbnail larger b) use a cropped image to draw attention to the muscles, and c) use an .SVG image (including a cropped bitmap) to provide some graphic help e.g. an outline or arrows to point out the muscles. I suppose some caption engineering would help a little. 342: 21: 68: 234: 207: 165: 491: 470: 3173: 3058: 2657: 639: 2801:, I believe that the problem with the phrase "the scientific name for a pterodactyl" is not that I came up with it, but that I put it into an official hook proposal, and then accepted it. So the phrase is not irredeemable if you still would like to use it. In addition, I can approve one of your proposed hooks if you just propose it officially, with the bolded intro like I did with ALT2. 501: 579: 122: 2728:, I think that the idea of a "wastebasket taxon" for ALT1 is interesting, but I don't quite understand what the rest of the hook was saying, maybe that could be expanded on in place of the "textbook definition". I still think that the addition of "the scientific name for a pterodactyl" is a helpful addition to clarifying to readers what this is. Let me know what you think. 3101: 2682: 2419: 3227: 1635: 3083:! As I said, you're allowed to tweak the hook; you're even allowed to tweak the article and continue reviewing it if you haven't done a major overhaul (in which case you would add yourself to the DYK credit line and call for a new reviewer). BTW, "taxa" is the plural of "taxon", and since "taxon" is linked earlier, I unlinked it. 1447:
I forgot to mention that Pterodactylus brevirostris was tentatively synonymized with Aurorazhdarcho micronyx by Wellnhofer (1970). Bennett (2013) mentions that the holotype is very similar to Aurorazhdarcho, and so it's possible that P. brevirostris (and hence Ptenodracon could be a senior synonym of
2945:
proposed the ALT1 hook and you are simply tweaking the language without adding any new facts, correct? So you can complete the review. But ALT3 is way over the 200-character limit. Please write out your suggested wording as ALT4, check that it's under 200 characters, and then review and approve it.
2804:
As for the new hook, it's a lot better. So I guess what you're saying is that many species used to be assigned to the taxon Pterodactylus, and then was moved to another taxon, right? maybe... "because many species were assigned to the taxon that were later reassigned to other genera and families?".
1250:
I was told that Pterodactyl was mentioned in Discovery Science as a mammal NOT a Reptile - as such it would be an evolutionary step away from avian-like reptiles, and most definitely not a Flying lizard or dinosaur ... can anyone get the reference and disambiguate and re-edit for this new viewpoint
1144:
Unfortunately I think Arthur might have misinterpreted the palm-forward thing. If you look at Conway's own skeletals showing this position the palm is forward, but the fingers don't all stick up. Instead they all sort of collapse together in a telescoping way along he wing finger. Hard to describe,
1095:
The CG image on the left side of the article shows Pterodactylus with "Walking With Dinosaurs" grade hands--the smaller fingers curve back over the wing finger. I'm pretty sure this is incorrect--the wing finger doesn't come out of the palm of the hand, it's a digit that begins at a metacarpal just
1034:
I don't know, but I would say that Bennett will publish his work concerning the synonymy of Pterodactylus kochi with P. antiquus and the distinctness of Daitingopterus (to be published as new genus for "Pterodactylus rhamphastinus"), Diopecephalus, and Germanodactylus will be published later this
806:
Bennett (1996, 2003) provided evidence that Pterodactylus kochi is conspecific with P. antiquus. Bennett (1996) demonstrated P. micronyx to be the juvenile of Gnathosaurus subulatus. These conclusions are based on analyses that plot the measurements of Pterodactylus elements against their size
732:
Pterodactylus is represented in Britain, France, and Tanzania each by two species. The British species are Pterodactylus manseli and Pterodactylus pleydelli, the French species are Pterodactylus cerinensis and Pterodactylus suprajurensis, and Tanzanian species are Pterodactylus arningi and
2747:, I also think that "the scientific name for a pterodactyl" is a helpful addition, but this isn't stated in one of my hooks, in addition to the fact that this segment was something you suggested, therefore, like Yoninah said, the reviewer is not allowed to approve a hook he/she suggested. 682:
Jouve (2004) demonstrated that Pterodactylus elegans is probably a species of Ctenochasma, resulting in the new combination Ctenochasma elegans (Wagner, 1861) comb. nov. For this reason, remove elegans from the Pterodactylus species list and transfer it to Ctenochasma.
1890:
Well, since you stated that it doesn't have the impressions, it may be inaccurate to put that as the caption? The image itself does sit within the Classification section, so it has nothing related to what the paragraphs say, so it can easily be substituted...?
733:
Pterodactylus maximus. Add these species to this page. In all, there are 8 species of Pterodactylus (2 in Britain, 2 in France, 2 in Germany , and 2 in Tanzania). This number of Pterodactylus species suggests that Pterodactylus is widespread.
2685:
Hi, I came by to promote this. I find the nominator's original hooks nicely descriptive and maybe other descriptive things could be found to write a good hook. But the reviewer's suggestion for ALT2 is simply a dictionary definition. BTW per
2845:
I've just took your suggestion above, and made some modifications while also adding the phrase "the scientific name for a pterodactyl", let me know whay you think. Oh, and yes, you did get the meaning of what a "wastebasket taxon" is.
1875:
And you'd draw on the muscles? But it doesn't have the impressions ... I think the impressions were quite reasonably sharp on the other image, but perhaps an Unsharp Mask would help (with or without an Edge Preserving Smooth first).
1111:
You're correct, the digits appear to be hyperextended relative to the wing in that case. Might be an easy fix, maybe you should contact the artist. I'm hesitant to remove it outright for a relatively minor inaccuracy as it's spot-on
2511:
Since the source says that a new specimen was found larger than the previous ones, maybe putting "maximum" would be good? Because as far as I know, the source was published in 2013 (pretty recent), and no other later discoveries of
2461:
I don't know if that specific wording would be correct, and it admittedly still sounds a bit awkward, but it'd be nice to add in how Pterodactylus relates to the well-known Pterodactyl, for that's what people will be interested in.
1096:
like the regular fingers. It doesn't even seem possible for a pterosaur to twist its fingers that way without breaking and/or dislocating them. Unless pterosaur digits articulated backwards, I just don't see how it could happen.
1016:
Jouve, S., 2004. Description of the skull of a Ctenochasma (Pterosauria) from the Late Jurassic of eastern France, with a taxonomic revision of European Tithonian Pterodactyloidea. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology: 3: 542-554.
3306: 2889:, I have a question for you. With this new modified hook, since I contributed a lot to the writing of a new hook, does that mean that the best action is to ask for another editor's approval of the hook? Please advise. 2771:
This is perhaps a more or less simplified way of saying it, but maybe it's still a bit too scientific, and also, I think "families" isn't needed since it confuses readers more? Let me know what you think about it.
178: 3361: 686:
Stéphane, J., 2004. Description of the skull of a *Ctenochasma* (Pterosauria) from the latest Jurassic of eastern France, with a taxonomic revision of European Tithonian Pterodactyloidea, JVP 24(3):542-554.
2435:, the source says: "a new specimen of P. antiquus larger than all previously known specimens, which demonstrates that the species exceeded 1 m in wingspan and had a low bony cranial crest", but you say it 3296: 1561:
article, just mention somewhere (history/classificaton) that this hypothesis has been proposed. Then we wait with any major restructuring until some kind of consensus emerges, however long that may take.
3311: 1987:
Many thanks. The new image is fine, though it would be nice to draw the reader's attention to the muscles in the image, with SVG graphics or some sort of explanation of what and where in the caption.
1010:
Bennett, S. C. 2003. New information on the genera Pterodactylus and Germanodactylus from the Solnhofen Limestone of southern Germany. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23(Suppl. to #3):33A.
265:-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 3326: 2050:
I see there's no 'In human culture' section. This seems a shame for such an iconic species, which created great excitement on its discovery. Perhaps that should be mentioned; there is indeed
1917:
Now I have no idea what you are talking about. The image originally in the article certainly had impressions; the one you propose above as a replacement doesn't, so it doesn't seem suitable.
447: 352: 319: 217: 428: 3356: 2496:
I've put "name" instead of "genus" since people will be more familiar when they see "scientific name" instead of "scientific genus". For my main hook, maybe a better way to say it is:
1535:
I'd hold off on splitting until we see something new from somebody other than Vidovic and Martill, who are the only ones during the past 25 years not treating these as growth stages.
418: 1276:
Well, this is not a "new viewpoint", no one supports that today. It wa proposed by someone in the 19th century that they were marsupials, but no one else has taken that seriously.
1035:
year. Germanodactylus will be restricted to the type species, G. cristatus (Witman, 1925), with G. rhamphastinus (Wagner, 1851) to be made the type of the new genus Daitingopterus.
1797:"Preserved fossil specimen of the species Rhamphorhynchus muensteri" - aren't all fossils preserved specimens? The wording doesn't seem necessary and isn't used on any other image. 1419:
Weirdly, it seemed to make sense at the time, an image of a specimen on Commons was once labelled as P. longirostris, but the specimen has since been referred to Aurorazhdarcho...
3366: 3271: 1007:
Bennett, S. C. 1996. Year-classes of pterosaurs from the Solnhofen Limestone of Germany: taxonomic and systematic implications. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16:432-444.
3245: 2822:
Then I guess I should put "ALT3" to my proposal to be approved officially? So, the phrase "the scientific name for a pterodactyl" could still be used? If so, how about this:
2578:
I like this combined hook idea. I think it's kinda confusing to talk about a "maximum wingspan that exceeds ___", because then you don't really have a maximum. Maybe just:
1767:
50 pixels really makes the cladogram images very small (hard to see). Perhaps around 80px would be better (it's certainly quite usual); the trees are not especially large.
3351: 2529:
Another idea I've got is perhaps mixing some info from my main hook ('cause I admit that the second one is really scientific) and your hook? Maybe something like this:
3321: 2629:
The word "pterosaur" actually describes the animal a bit more, but since you said that there is Pterodactylus and pterodactyl already, I'm actually ok removing it.
2296: 1673: 631: 290: 300: 1640: 1013:
Bennett, S. C. 2006. Juvenile specimens of the pterosaur Germanodactylus cristatus, with a review of the genus. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 26:872-878.
394: 381: 347: 1148:. Notice that digit 1 is behind digit 2 is behind digit 3, so the "palm" such as it is does face forward. But the fingers aren't out of the plane of the wing. 2375: 1663: 1315:
I'd have to double check but I *think* this is a case where the same species name was used twice for two different type specimens (maybe one started out as
3346: 3336: 452: 324: 1162:
Yeah, I've noticed that none of his pictures have hyperextended fingers, before or after that journal. Any idea what to do about the Pterodactylus, then?
2094:
I've included the 'In popular culture' section, and I think you've already seen it. Should I change anything, though? Or maybe include something more?
695:
A study by Mateer (1976) recognizes two species of Pterodactylus from Germany: Pterodactylus antiquus (P. kochi is a junior synonym) and P. micronyx.
3376: 3291: 547: 1024:
Any idea if/when this is going to be published? The abstract came out four years ago, and Bennett has published on similar subjects in the interval.
3386: 3316: 3301: 3162: 3047: 2923: 2863: 2789: 2646: 2608:
Also, what do you think about getting rid of the word "pterosaur"? Since we already have Pterodactylus and pterodactyl. Let me know what you think.
2562: 2208: 2155: 2111: 2082: 2018: 1978: 1948: 1908: 1866: 1176:
I'll have some time and can try to photoshop it later this week, unless anybody else wants to take a crack at it. Shouldn't be too hard to correct.
557: 266: 79: 1130:. I don't quite understand how that results in "Walking With Dinosaurs" grade hands but according to Arthur (the artist) it was fully intentional. 3341: 3281: 2879:", as many species were assigned to it and later reassigned to other genera and families?" to be more concise. Everything else looks good. Thanks! 739: 708: 3381: 3331: 2191:, I've just started yesterday with it. Anyways, I'm happy that this iconic creature has passed the GA review, thanks again for the efforts! 1215: 627: 2164:
Many thanks, good work. I'm happy to pass this now. It would be great if you could pick one or two articles to review from the GAN list.
1931:
Oh, I actually got confused with what you said before. I'll try with the Unsharp mask for the image then. I apologize for the confusion.
1738:'"Naturalienkabinett", or nature cabinet' - the Wikilink should be displayed in full as Cabinet of curiosities, as that is its ancestry. 1712: 1645: 1163: 1145:
but they're not hyperextended. It's more like a variation on the orientation of folded maniraptoran hands. You can sort of see it here:
1131: 1097: 743: 712: 257: 212: 93: 2509:
had a maximum wingspan exceeding 1 meter (3.3 ft), and a feature that the animal itself had was a low bony cranial crest on its skull?"
2312: 3371: 3237: 3219: 523: 150: 2065:
As for the 'In human culture' section, which I think would be better as 'In popular culture', might take time, but I'll start today.
786:
A specimen with a wingspan of 1.5 metres would have measured about 55 centimetres from the tip of the snout to the end of the tail.--
2001:
I've specified putting "in the chest and wing-membranes" in the caption, since that's where the muscles are, would it work, though?
3286: 3276: 1668: 85: 1464:
True, but I'd wait for a more thorough discussion on potential synonymy before doing anything here. Maybe we should include
2058:
were "pterodactylic" (see there for citations). Not to mention merchandise, soft toys, etc. The section can be quite brief.
514: 475: 3158: 3043: 2919: 2859: 2785: 2642: 2558: 2403: 2204: 2151: 2107: 2078: 2014: 1974: 1944: 1904: 1862: 187: 3005:? I've removed "pterosaur" and consolidated "genera and families" into "taxon" and linked it for those who don't know. 1204:
There's a viral video and it's fast becoming a pop cultural idea of the Pterodactyle in the cartoons of theoatmeal.com
2338:
only had a wingspan exceeding 1 meter (3.3 ft), and the animal itself also had a low bony cranial crest on its skull?
2255: 1526: 46: 1849:
one (it's actually a fossilized pelvis), I know it has nothing to do with the previous one, but would it still work?
1733:
WOW, that was fast! It's just today that I've nominated it, also, thanks! Anyway, I've finished with the corrections.
1074:
I think Oken's 'suevicus' is actually a 1916 name, but yes, it is apparently a nomen nudum. The description is here:
1845:
Hey, I tried to upload a cropped version of the muscle impressions, but it looks all blurred, so I was thinking of
2545:
I'll admit I'm not so good at creating hooks, but is this a good idea, or should we just stick to the ones above?
2431:
might be more interesting if written well, but it's really technical, and I honestly don't understand it. For the
1020:
Therefore, update the Pterodactylus taxobox and page, once Bennett publishes his (2003) abstract as a full paper.
50: 2690:, the reviewer is not allowed to approve a hook he suggested. Could you suggest something else please? Thanks, 736:
Mateer, N. J. 1976 A statistical study of the genus Pterodactylus. Bull. geol. Inst. Univ. Uppsala 6, 97-105.
698:
Mateer, N. J. 1976 A statistical study of the genus Pterodactylus. Bull. geol. Inst. Univ. Uppsala 6, 97-105.
1219: 1044: 666:
which is a common term for pterosaurs as a whole. Any information on pop culture etc. should be palced at the
1497: 1126:
According to the artist it's based off a lecture by John Conway in which he argued a "palm forward" position
3176: 3146: 3031: 3002: 2942: 2907: 2872: 2847: 2798: 2773: 2725: 2630: 2573: 2546: 2399: 2192: 2169: 2139: 2129: 2095: 2066: 2002: 1992: 1962: 1932: 1922: 1892: 1881: 1850: 1782: 1706: 1267: 1167: 1135: 1101: 747: 716: 1842:
The image may take a while, but I'll try to upload a cropped version of it showing the muscle impressions.
763:. I'll dig up cites if I can, but I haven't seen a survey in years that lists more than 3 valid species of 3253: 2367:", with many specimens split from the type species, and were then placed in different genera and families? 1691: 1687: 1522: 1453: 100: 1961:
of the image, is it OK now, or should I do more adjustments? Also, sorry again for the confusion before.
1146: 67: 2843:", this is because many species were assigned to it, and later reassigned to other genera and families?" 594: 193: 3137:
The citation for the hook (which is also the one for ALT1) says: "Until relatively recently, the genus
2422:
It works! Long enough, sourced, eligible. I changed your image width to "160" because it is horizontal.
2752:
As for the "wastebasket taxon" hook, maybe we could simplify what it states, perhaps something like: "
2439:
exceeds one meter, giving the idea that it is small. Can you come up with some better hooks? Maybe...
385:, an effort to make Knowledge a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for 1211: 1075: 1802:"The Solnhofen Limestone is diverse Lagerstätte" - perhaps "consists of" or better "is exposed in". 1254: 437: 309: 249: 54: 2370:
Source: "Throughout the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries, specimens were split from the type species
2341:
Source: "demonstrates that the species exceeded 1 m in wingspan and had a low bony cranial crest"
1818:(or provide a "further" link) at 'Growth and breeding seasons' where the genus is first mentioned. 1518: 522:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
153:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
3241: 3215: 2180: 2165: 2125: 2051: 1988: 1918: 1877: 1778: 1702: 1609: 1567: 1540: 1508: 1473: 1424: 1410: 1384: 1370: 1356: 1305: 1281: 1258: 1235: 1181: 1153: 1117: 1050: 2342: 701:
Pterodactylus grandipelvis and P. grandis may also be synonyms of P. antiquus, because they are
578: 3249: 3188: 3117: 3109: 3088: 3070: 3010: 2988: 2951: 2894: 2876: 2840: 2810: 2766: 2733: 2695: 2669: 2613: 2467: 2364: 2276: 1581: 1449: 620: 89: 3145:
that has included many diverse pterosaurs..." It is in the lines 37-38 if it's hard to find.
1846: 1079: 29: 1958: 1327:. Third, Cuvier, ignoring Sommering's paper, added a species name to the type specimen, as 1208:
Maybe it's worth mentioning somewhere but I'm new to this so will leave it to the experts
20: 2687: 2124:
are certainly noteworthy, and if you look there you'll find a citation ready and waiting.
1814: 1127: 808: 2664:. Since you prefer keeping 'pterosaur', we'll keep it there unless someone else objects. 2769:", with many species assigned to it, and later reassigned to other genera and families?" 1393:
Scratch that, looks like the source I used was intending to refer specimens referred to
1550: 1297: 1065: 791: 506: 368: 341: 3065:. The hook looks good, and it is well cited. Everything else has been checked before. 767:
They can certainly be discussed in the text, but I wouldn't list them in the taxobox.
393:. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the 3265: 3180: 3105: 2979: 2831: 2757: 2589: 2534: 2501: 2481: 2355: 2330: 1605: 1600: 1563: 1536: 1504: 1469: 1420: 1406: 1380: 1366: 1352: 1301: 1277: 1231: 1177: 1149: 1113: 1046: 1025: 768: 671: 611: 3179:, I believe what Yoninah is saying is that you need to cite the fact in the article 3030:
is a proper noun given to a specific type of animal, "the" is probably unnecessary.
2240:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
3184: 3132: 3113: 3084: 3080: 3066: 3019: 3006: 2947: 2936: 2903: 2890: 2884: 2819: 2806: 2744: 2729: 2721: 2691: 2665: 2624: 2609: 2463: 2272: 1577: 1493: 262: 138: 1300:
article, there's a Pterodactylus longirostris von Meyer, 1859. What's the matter?
599: 667: 233: 206: 3172: 3057: 2656: 2246:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
1246:
Was Pterodactyl a reptile or dinosaur - anyone have Discovery Science reference
3100: 2681: 2418: 496: 490: 469: 239: 1757:
Many .. were found in England. Perhaps say in which formations (or counties).
1296:
Here a Pterodactylus longirostris is attributted to Cuvier, 1819. But in the
1043:
Is the Pterodactylus "suevicus" Oken, 1825 mentioned here the same as this?
2595: 2540: 2491: 2452: 2187: 1061: 787: 659: 589: 386: 2121: 2055: 1694:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 45:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 1351:
was named for a different specimen and so is a homonym but not a synonym.
1205: 2599: 2185:
Thanks for the efforts on the review! I'm actually reviewing the article
782:
it doesnt say how long they were so cant really get the proportions.....
3226: 1762:"Holotype specimen of Cimoliopterus" - maybe say it's the jaw or snout. 519: 390: 3257: 3192: 3166: 3121: 3092: 3074: 3051: 3014: 2955: 2927: 2898: 2867: 2814: 2793: 2737: 2699: 2673: 2650: 2617: 2566: 2471: 2407: 2280: 2212: 2173: 2159: 2133: 2115: 2086: 2022: 1996: 1982: 1952: 1926: 1912: 1885: 1870: 1786: 1716: 1613: 1585: 1571: 1544: 1530: 1512: 1477: 1457: 1428: 1414: 1388: 1374: 1360: 1323:
with no species name. Subsequently, Sommering named the same specimen
1309: 1285: 1262: 1239: 1223: 1185: 1171: 1157: 1139: 1121: 1105: 1082: 1069: 1054: 1028: 795: 771: 751: 720: 2993: 2991:", as many species were assigned to it and later reassigned to other 2258:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 1230:
Any reputable, published articles discussing it's cultural impact?
3244:. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at 2448: 1774:
I've kept the images at 70px, 'cause 80px looked a bit too large.
1397:
by Meyer to Cuvier's type species, not create an additional name.
1266: 3246:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 6 § P. antiquus
3022:, everything is good enough, though I think putting "the" before 1503:
is in press. Seems this article will have some problems by then.
1076:
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/276843#page/341/mode/1up
2987:, the scientific name for a pterodactyl, had been considered a " 2839:, the scientific name for a pterodactyl, had been considered a " 619:, the scientific name for a pterodactyl, had been considered a " 3307:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
759:
Most of those species are too dubious to assign definately to
573: 158: 116: 62: 15: 637: 436: 308: 2906:, We could change it a bit of course, I don't really mind. 2543:
that had a maximum wingspan that exceeds 1 meter (3.3 ft)?"
623:" as many species were assigned to it and later reassigned? 3362:
GA-Class amphibian and reptile articles of High-importance
2494:
that most likely preyed on fish and other small animals?"
2455:
that most likely preyed on fish and other small animals?"
1828:
is actually already linked in the 'Life history' section.
1319:?). Edit: Ok, so Cuvier latinized his "Ptero-Dactyle" as 3061:
Since the change is small, I just removed the word from
3297:
Knowledge vital articles in Biology and health sciences
3232: 2301: 2292: 1729:
What a fascinating article, and on an iconic subject.
809:
http://archosauria.org/pterosauria/taxonomy/species.pdf
146: 142: 133: 128: 106: 3312:
GA-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
2391:: This just got pass GA yesterday, so it works, right? 630:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 3104:
Hi, I came by to promote this, but it's important to
3240:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
518:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 261:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1468:on both pages under synonyms with a question mark. 1365:Ouch. What does that mean for redirects? Disambig? 3327:GA-Class Palaeontology articles of High-importance 2476:Maybe a better way to say what you said above is: 1078:. I think this needs to be added to the list. — 92:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 2594:, the scientific name for a pterodactyl, was a 2374:, and placed in different genera and families" 632:Template:Did you know nominations/Pterodactylus 3357:High-importance amphibian and reptile articles 1777:Many thanks. The tree works a lot better now. 2539:, the scientific name for pterodactyl, was a 1379:I think a disambig would be necessary, yeah. 1343:Cuvier 1819 is a junior objective synonym of 403:Knowledge:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles 8: 3367:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles 3272:Knowledge articles that use American English 3183:, which you just did. It should be gtg now. 2260:No further edits should be made to this page 728:French, British, and Tanzanian Pterodactylus 406:Template:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles 1557:article, but don't do major changes to the 1807:"closer related" - "more closely related". 1623: 464: 336: 201: 120: 33:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 1549:We could maybe treat it like we did with 602:). The text of the entry was as follows: 2941:looking at this thread, it appears that 884:(von Sömmering, 1816–17) Lydekker, 1888 127:Text and/or other creative content from 3352:GA-Class amphibian and reptile articles 1654: 1626: 1604:article, so I just redirected to that. 1499:, it is mentioned a paper resurrecting 1206:http://theoatmeal.com/pterodactyl_video 466: 338: 203: 3322:High-importance Palaeontology articles 1743:Edward Cope is a disambiguation page. 891:(von Sömmering, 1816–17) Oken, 1819 857:(von Sömmering, 1812) Lydekker, 1888 819:Cuvier, 1809 emend. Rafinesque, 1815 626:A record of the entry may be seen at 53:, this should not be changed without 7: 3106:cite the hook fact(s) in the article 628:Knowledge:Recent additions/2020/July 512:This article is within the scope of 255:This article is within the scope of 164: 162: 2398:Improved to Good Article status by 802:Revision of the genus Pterodactylus 382:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles 275:Knowledge:WikiProject Palaeontology 192:It is of interest to the following 3347:WikiProject Palaeontology articles 3337:Top-importance Pterosaurs articles 3001:What do you think about this hook 1335:as genus priority but Sommering's 929:Pterodactylus crocodilocephaloides 278:Template:WikiProject Palaeontology 14: 1292:Pterodactylus longirostris twice? 638: 88:. If you can improve it further, 3377:High-importance Germany articles 3292:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 3225: 3171: 3099: 3056: 2680: 2655: 2427:Let's talk about these hooks... 2417: 2311: 831:= "Pterotherium" Fischer, 1813 577: 499: 489: 468: 367: 340: 242: 232: 205: 172: 163: 66: 19: 3387:Knowledge Did you know articles 3317:GA-Class Palaeontology articles 3302:GA-Class level-5 vital articles 3248:until a consensus is reached. 2243:Please do not modify this page. 1598:Seems there was already an old 948:(Wagner, 1837) von Meyer, 1859 552:This article has been rated as 423:This article has been rated as 295:This article has been rated as 3342:Pterosaurs task force articles 3282:Natural sciences good articles 3026:is a bit inappropriate, since 2602:could exceed 1 meter (3.3 ft)? 1957:I've uploaded a cropped (new) 1521:Let the splitting begin...... 962:(Wagner, 1837) Lydekker, 1888 691:Status of German Pterodactylus 409:amphibian and reptile articles 80:Natural sciences good articles 76:has been listed as one of the 1: 1721:I'll have a go at this one. 1429:19:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 1415:18:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 1091:Error in life reconstruction? 1070:08:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 1029:03:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 992:Rhamphorhynchus scolopaciceps 978:(Münster, 1842) Wagner, 1851 796:14:51, 20 November 2009 (UTC) 772:21:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 752:20:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 721:19:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 532:Knowledge:WikiProject Germany 526:and see a list of open tasks. 445:This article is supported by 317:This article is supported by 269:and see a list of open tasks. 3382:WikiProject Germany articles 3332:GA-Class Pterosaurs articles 1513:08:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC) 1389:21:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 1375:19:29, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 1361:17:11, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 1339:has priority of species. So 1310:11:56, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 1083:20:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC) 955:(Wagner, 1837) Seeley, 1871 914:(Cuvier, 1819) Ritgen, 1826 912:Ornithocephalus longirostris 907:(Cuvier, 1819) Giebel, 1852 872:Ornithocephalus brevirostris 662:. It is a different term to 535:Template:WikiProject Germany 3112:". Please add one. Thanks, 3108:. I do not see a cite for " 2256:Knowledge talk:Did you know 2248:this nomination's talk page 1286:21:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC) 1263:20:40, 24 August 2013 (UTC) 984:Pterodactylus scolopaciceps 905:Macrotrachelus longirostris 3403: 1443:Pterodactylus brevirostris 1329:Pterodactylus longirostris 1271:Marsupial pterosaurs, 1843 1240:13:28, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 1224:02:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 1055:02:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 897:Pterodactylus longirostris 889:Pterodactylus brevirostris 558:project's importance scale 429:project's importance scale 301:project's importance scale 3372:GA-Class Germany articles 3258:21:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC) 3193:22:53, 17 July 2020 (UTC) 3167:19:07, 17 July 2020 (UTC) 3122:22:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC) 3093:19:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 3075:19:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 3052:19:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 3015:18:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 2956:18:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 2928:17:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 2899:16:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 2868:16:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 2815:16:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 2794:15:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 2738:13:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 2720:Thanks for the comments, 2700:13:24, 15 July 2020 (UTC) 2674:16:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 2651:17:52, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 2618:12:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 2567:07:45, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 2472:00:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC) 2451:for a pterodactyl, was a 2408:10:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC) 2281:19:08, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 2138:Included, anything else? 1586:17:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 1572:15:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 1545:15:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 1531:21:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC) 1519:And the paper is now out. 1478:12:17, 7 April 2014 (UTC) 1458:19:35, 6 April 2014 (UTC) 1122:19:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 1106:18:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 1000:Pterodactylus spectabilis 674:03:48, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) 551: 484: 448:the Pterosaurs task force 444: 422: 362: 320:the Pterosaurs task force 316: 294: 258:WikiProject Palaeontology 227: 200: 137:was copied or moved into 3238:redirects for discussion 3220:Redirects for discussion 3141:Cuvier, 1809 had been a 2531:"... that the pterosaur 2498:"... that the pterosaur 2478:"... that the pterosaur 2213:19:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC) 2174:18:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC) 2160:16:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC) 2134:14:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC) 2116:14:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC) 2087:17:40, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 2023:08:22, 9 June 2020 (UTC) 1997:07:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC) 1983:20:45, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 1953:19:05, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 1927:18:58, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 1913:18:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 1886:18:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 1871:18:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 1787:17:47, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 1717:16:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 1614:00:22, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1325:Ornithocephalus antiquus 1186:14:04, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 1172:00:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 1158:22:14, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 1140:16:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 1039:Pterodactylus "suevicus" 881:Ptenodracon brevirostris 863:Ornithocephalus antiquus 598:column on 23 July 2020 ( 588:appeared on Knowledge's 3287:GA-Class vital articles 3277:Knowledge good articles 2828:... that the pterosaur 2765:had been considered a " 2754:... that the pterosaur 2586:... that the pterosaur 2516:found larger specimens. 2490:for pterodactyl, was a 2363:had been considered a " 2352:... that the pterosaur 2327:... that the pterosaur 2317:Life reconstruction of 2252:the article's talk page 2233:Did you know nomination 2091:Looking forward to it. 875:von Sömmering, 1816–17 658:is a specific genus of 400:Amphibians and Reptiles 348:Amphibians and Reptiles 2372:Pterodactylus antiquus 2054:; Tolkien stated that 1692:Talk:Pterodactylus/GA1 1272: 976:Ornithocephalus meyeri 923:"suevicus" Oken, 1825 811:) is presented below: 643: 441: 313: 281:Palaeontology articles 2406:). Self-nominated at 1553:; we make a separate 1331:. Therefore Cuvier's 1270: 960:Ornithocephalus kochi 938:Ornithocephalus kochi 742:comment was added by 711:comment was added by 678:Pterodactylus elegans 641: 440: 397:for more information. 312: 179:level-5 vital article 86:good article criteria 2120:The "pterodactylic" 1491:In the paper naming 968:Pterodactylus meyeri 866:von Sömmering, 1812 828:von Sömmering, 1812 145:. The former page's 51:relevant style guide 47:varieties of English 3242:redirect guidelines 3236:has been listed at 1576:Sounds good to me. 1501:Diopecephalus kochi 953:Diopecephalus kochi 946:Pterodactylus kochi 608:... that the genus 515:WikiProject Germany 250:Paleontology portal 151:provide attribution 49:. According to the 3177:JurassicClassic767 3003:JurassicClassic767 2943:JurassicClassic767 2873:JurassicClassic767 2799:JurassicClassic767 2726:JurassicClassic767 2574:JurassicClassic767 2400:JurassicClassic767 2052:Pterodactyl (film) 1273: 994:(von Meyer, 1850) 644: 617:(species depicted) 442: 314: 188:content assessment 3143:wastebasket taxon 3110:wastebasket taxon 2989:wastebasket taxon 2877:wastebasket taxon 2841:wastebasket taxon 2767:wastebasket taxon 2486:, the scientific 2447:, the scientific 2411: 2377: 2365:wastebasket taxon 2344: 1682: 1681: 1523:Lythronaxargestes 1487:to be resurrected 1214:comment added by 1128:as described here 1080:Dr Mark D. Scherz 755: 724: 648: 647: 621:wastebasket taxon 572: 571: 568: 567: 564: 563: 463: 462: 459: 458: 335: 334: 331: 330: 157: 156: 115: 114: 111: 104:: June 9, 2020. ( 61: 60: 3394: 3235: 3229: 3175: 3155: 3152: 3149: 3136: 3103: 3060: 3040: 3037: 3034: 2940: 2916: 2913: 2910: 2888: 2875:, nice. Maybe "" 2856: 2853: 2850: 2782: 2779: 2776: 2684: 2659: 2639: 2636: 2633: 2628: 2577: 2555: 2552: 2549: 2421: 2397: 2369: 2340: 2315: 2267:The result was: 2245: 2201: 2198: 2195: 2184: 2148: 2145: 2142: 2104: 2101: 2098: 2075: 2072: 2069: 2027:Certainly helps. 2011: 2008: 2005: 1971: 1968: 1965: 1941: 1938: 1935: 1901: 1898: 1895: 1859: 1856: 1853: 1636:Copyvio detector 1624: 1448:Aurorazhdarcho. 1226: 1003:von Meyer, 1861 987:von Meyer, 1850 737: 706: 640: 581: 574: 540: 539: 538:Germany articles 536: 533: 530: 509: 504: 503: 502: 493: 486: 485: 480: 472: 465: 411: 410: 407: 404: 401: 371: 364: 363: 358: 355: 344: 337: 283: 282: 279: 276: 273: 252: 247: 246: 245: 236: 229: 228: 223: 220: 209: 202: 185: 176: 175: 168: 167: 166: 159: 136: 124: 123: 117: 109: 107:Reviewed version 98: 70: 63: 30:American English 26:This article is 23: 16: 3402: 3401: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3262: 3261: 3231: 3223: 3211: 3153: 3150: 3147: 3130: 3038: 3035: 3032: 2934: 2914: 2911: 2908: 2882: 2854: 2851: 2848: 2780: 2777: 2774: 2637: 2634: 2631: 2622: 2571: 2553: 2550: 2547: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2308: 2306: 2302:Article history 2241: 2235: 2199: 2196: 2193: 2178: 2146: 2143: 2140: 2102: 2099: 2096: 2073: 2070: 2067: 2009: 2006: 2003: 1969: 1966: 1963: 1939: 1936: 1933: 1899: 1896: 1893: 1857: 1854: 1851: 1826:Rhamphorhynchus 1815:Rhamphorhynchus 1812:Maybe wikilink 1750:Ornithocephalus 1727: 1686:This review is 1678: 1650: 1622: 1489: 1460:Vahe Demirjian 1445: 1349:P. longirpstris 1341:P. longirostris 1317:Ornithocephalus 1294: 1248: 1209: 1202: 1093: 1041: 849:Lydekker, 1888 825:Ornithocephalus 804: 780: 738:—The preceding 730: 707:—The preceding 693: 680: 653: 554:High-importance 537: 534: 531: 528: 527: 505: 500: 498: 479:High‑importance 478: 425:High-importance 408: 405: 402: 399: 398: 357:High‑importance 356: 350: 297:High-importance 280: 277: 274: 271: 270: 248: 243: 241: 222:High‑importance 221: 215: 186:on Knowledge's 183: 173: 132: 121: 105: 55:broad consensus 12: 11: 5: 3400: 3398: 3390: 3389: 3384: 3379: 3374: 3369: 3364: 3359: 3354: 3349: 3344: 3339: 3334: 3329: 3324: 3319: 3314: 3309: 3304: 3299: 3294: 3289: 3284: 3279: 3274: 3264: 3263: 3222: 3212: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3125: 3124: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2880: 2802: 2749: 2748: 2741: 2740: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2660:Good to go as 2606: 2605: 2604: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2424: 2423: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2386: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2316: 2310: 2309: 2305: 2304: 2299: 2289: 2287: 2283: 2265: 2264: 2236: 2234: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2060: 2059: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 1915: 1837: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1820: 1819: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1759: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1745: 1744: 1740: 1739: 1735: 1734: 1726: 1723: 1697: 1696: 1680: 1679: 1677: 1676: 1671: 1666: 1660: 1657: 1656: 1652: 1651: 1649: 1648: 1646:External links 1643: 1638: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1551:Ornithoscelida 1488: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1444: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1298:Aurorazhdarcho 1293: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1251:or theory ... 1247: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1216:216.58.110.168 1201: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1040: 1037: 1032: 1031: 1006: 971:Münster, 1842 837:Macrotrachelus 803: 800: 799: 798: 779: 776: 775: 774: 729: 726: 692: 689: 679: 676: 652: 649: 646: 645: 635: 625: 624: 582: 570: 569: 566: 565: 562: 561: 550: 544: 543: 541: 524:the discussion 511: 510: 507:Germany portal 494: 482: 481: 473: 461: 460: 457: 456: 453:Top-importance 443: 433: 432: 421: 415: 414: 412: 372: 360: 359: 345: 333: 332: 329: 328: 325:Top-importance 315: 305: 304: 293: 287: 286: 284: 267:the discussion 254: 253: 237: 225: 224: 210: 198: 197: 191: 169: 155: 154: 149:now serves to 125: 113: 112: 97: 71: 59: 58: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3399: 3388: 3385: 3383: 3380: 3378: 3375: 3373: 3370: 3368: 3365: 3363: 3360: 3358: 3355: 3353: 3350: 3348: 3345: 3343: 3340: 3338: 3335: 3333: 3330: 3328: 3325: 3323: 3320: 3318: 3315: 3313: 3310: 3308: 3305: 3303: 3300: 3298: 3295: 3293: 3290: 3288: 3285: 3283: 3280: 3278: 3275: 3273: 3270: 3269: 3267: 3260: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3234: 3230:The redirect 3228: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3181:Pterodactylus 3178: 3174: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3144: 3140: 3139:Pterodactylus 3134: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3102: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3059: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3029: 3028:Pterodactylus 3025: 3024:Pterodactylus 3021: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2996: 2995: 2990: 2986: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980:Pterodactylus 2975: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2944: 2938: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2905: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2886: 2881: 2878: 2874: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2844: 2842: 2838: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832:Pterodactylus 2825: 2821: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2803: 2800: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2770: 2768: 2764: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758:Pterodactylus 2751: 2750: 2746: 2743: 2742: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2718: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2683: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2658: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2626: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590:Pterodactylus 2583: 2580: 2579: 2575: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2544: 2542: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535:Pterodactylus 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2515: 2514:Pterodactylus 2510: 2508: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502:Pterodactylus 2495: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482:Pterodactylus 2475: 2474: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2460: 2456: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2445:Pterodactylus 2441: 2440: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2420: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2390: 2387: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2376: 2373: 2368: 2366: 2362: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356:Pterodactylus 2349: 2346: 2345: 2343: 2339: 2337: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331:Pterodactylus 2325: 2324: 2320: 2319:Pterodactylus 2314: 2303: 2300: 2298: 2294: 2291: 2290: 2286: 2284: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2263: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2244: 2238: 2237: 2232: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2190: 2189: 2182: 2181:Chiswick Chap 2177: 2176: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2166:Chiswick Chap 2163: 2162: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2126:Chiswick Chap 2123: 2122:Nazgûl#Steeds 2119: 2118: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2093: 2092: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2057: 2056:Nazgûl#Steeds 2053: 2049: 2048: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1989:Chiswick Chap 1986: 1985: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1960: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1919:Chiswick Chap 1916: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1878:Chiswick Chap 1874: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1848: 1844: 1843: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1834: 1833: 1827: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1779:Chiswick Chap 1776: 1775: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1724: 1722: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1711: 1708: 1704: 1703:Chiswick Chap 1701: 1695: 1693: 1689: 1684: 1683: 1675: 1672: 1670: 1667: 1665: 1662: 1661: 1659: 1658: 1653: 1647: 1644: 1642: 1639: 1637: 1634: 1633: 1631: 1630: 1625: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1601:Diopecephalus 1597: 1596: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1560: 1559:Pterodactylus 1556: 1555:Diopecephalus 1552: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1496: 1495: 1486: 1485:Diopecephalus 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1442: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1333:Pterodactylus 1330: 1326: 1322: 1321:Pterodactylus 1318: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1269: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1207: 1199: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1164:97.104.210.67 1161: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1132:97.104.210.67 1129: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098:97.104.210.67 1090: 1084: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1045: 1038: 1036: 1030: 1027: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1018: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1004: 1002: 1001: 995: 993: 988: 986: 985: 979: 977: 972: 970: 969: 963: 961: 956: 954: 949: 947: 942: 941:Wagner, 1837 940: 939: 933: 932:Ritgen, 1826 931: 930: 924: 922: 921: 920:Pterodactylus 915: 913: 908: 906: 901: 900:Cuvier, 1819 899: 898: 892: 890: 885: 883: 882: 876: 874: 873: 867: 865: 864: 858: 856: 855: 850: 848: 847: 841: 840:Giebel, 1852 839: 838: 832: 829: 827: 826: 820: 818: 817: 816:Pterodactylus 812: 810: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 784: 783: 777: 773: 770: 766: 762: 758: 757: 756: 753: 749: 745: 744:72.194.116.63 741: 734: 727: 725: 722: 718: 714: 713:72.194.116.63 710: 704: 699: 696: 690: 688: 684: 677: 675: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 656:Pterodactylus 650: 636: 633: 629: 622: 618: 615: 614: 613: 612:Pterodactylus 607: 604: 603: 601: 597: 596: 591: 587: 586:Pterodactylus 583: 580: 576: 575: 559: 555: 549: 546: 545: 542: 525: 521: 517: 516: 508: 497: 495: 492: 488: 487: 483: 477: 474: 471: 467: 454: 451:(assessed as 450: 449: 439: 435: 434: 430: 426: 420: 417: 416: 413: 396: 392: 388: 384: 383: 378: 377: 376:Pterodactylus 373: 370: 366: 365: 361: 354: 349: 346: 343: 339: 326: 323:(assessed as 322: 321: 311: 307: 306: 302: 298: 292: 289: 288: 285: 272:Palaeontology 268: 264: 263:palaeontology 260: 259: 251: 240: 238: 235: 231: 230: 226: 219: 214: 213:Palaeontology 211: 208: 204: 199: 195: 189: 181: 180: 170: 161: 160: 152: 148: 144: 140: 135: 134:Pterodactylus 130: 126: 119: 118: 108: 103: 102: 95: 91: 87: 83: 82: 81: 75: 74:Pterodactylus 72: 69: 65: 64: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 32: 31: 25: 22: 18: 17: 3250:Hemiauchenia 3224: 3218:" listed at 3142: 3138: 3062: 3027: 3023: 2992: 2984: 2978: 2977: 2973: 2972: 2836: 2830: 2829: 2827: 2823: 2762: 2756: 2755: 2753: 2661: 2588: 2587: 2585: 2581: 2533: 2532: 2530: 2513: 2506: 2500: 2499: 2497: 2487: 2480: 2479: 2477: 2444: 2442: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2396: 2388: 2371: 2360: 2354: 2353: 2351: 2347: 2335: 2329: 2328: 2326: 2318: 2285: 2268: 2266: 2259: 2251: 2247: 2242: 2239: 2186: 1825: 1813: 1749: 1728: 1720: 1709: 1699: 1698: 1685: 1674:Instructions 1599: 1558: 1554: 1500: 1494:Aerodactylus 1492: 1490: 1484: 1466:brevirostris 1465: 1450:Extrapolaris 1446: 1402: 1399:longirostris 1398: 1395:longirostris 1394: 1348: 1347:. The other 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1295: 1253: 1249: 1210:— Preceding 1203: 1094: 1042: 1033: 1019: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1005: 999: 998: 996: 991: 989: 983: 982: 980: 975: 973: 967: 966: 964: 959: 957: 952: 950: 945: 943: 937: 936: 934: 928: 927: 925: 919: 918: 916: 911: 909: 904: 902: 896: 895: 893: 888: 886: 880: 879: 877: 871: 870: 868: 862: 861: 859: 853: 852: 851: 845: 844: 842: 836: 835: 833: 830: 824: 823: 821: 815: 814: 813: 805: 781: 764: 760: 735: 731: 703:nomina dubia 702: 700: 697: 694: 685: 681: 663: 655: 654: 616: 610: 609: 606:Did you know 605: 595:Did you know 593: 585: 584:A fact from 553: 513: 446: 424: 395:project page 380: 375: 374: 318: 296: 256: 194:WikiProjects 177: 139:Aerodactylus 129:this version 99: 90:please do so 78: 77: 73: 42: 38: 34: 27: 3233:P. antiquus 3216:P. antiquus 2976:: ... that 1688:transcluded 1345:P. antiquus 1200:Pop culture 854:P. antiquus 846:Ptenodracon 668:pterodactyl 664:pterodactyl 600:check views 379:is part of 28:written in 3266:Categories 2985:(pictured) 2837:(pictured) 2763:(pictured) 2507:(pictured) 2443:"... that 2361:(pictured) 2336:(pictured) 1641:Authorship 1627:GA toolbox 1381:MMartyniuk 1353:MMartyniuk 1232:MMartyniuk 1112:otherwise. 387:amphibians 353:Pterosaurs 218:Pterosaurs 84:under the 2596:carnivore 2541:carnivore 2492:carnivore 2453:carnivore 2433:main hook 2188:Echinodon 1700:Reviewer: 1664:Templates 1655:Reviewing 1620:GA Review 670:article. 660:pterosaur 642:Knowledge 590:Main Page 182:is rated 143:this edit 3163:contribs 3148:Jurassic 3079:Thanks, 3048:contribs 3033:Jurassic 2946:Thanks, 2924:contribs 2909:Jurassic 2864:contribs 2849:Jurassic 2790:contribs 2775:Jurassic 2647:contribs 2632:Jurassic 2600:wingspan 2563:contribs 2548:Jurassic 2269:promoted 2209:contribs 2194:Jurassic 2156:contribs 2141:Jurassic 2112:contribs 2097:Jurassic 2083:contribs 2068:Jurassic 2019:contribs 2004:Jurassic 1979:contribs 1964:Jurassic 1949:contribs 1934:Jurassic 1909:contribs 1894:Jurassic 1867:contribs 1852:Jurassic 1725:Comments 1713:contribs 1669:Criteria 1606:FunkMonk 1564:FunkMonk 1537:Dinoguy2 1505:FunkMonk 1470:Dinoguy2 1421:FunkMonk 1407:Dinoguy2 1403:antiquus 1367:FunkMonk 1337:antiquus 1302:FunkMonk 1278:FunkMonk 1255:AspieNo1 1212:unsigned 1178:Dinoguy2 1150:Dinoguy2 1114:Dinoguy2 1047:FunkMonk 1026:Dinoguy2 769:Dinoguy2 740:unsigned 709:unsigned 672:Martyman 651:Untitled 391:reptiles 184:GA-class 94:reassess 43:traveled 3185:Awsomaw 3151:Classic 3133:Yoninah 3114:Yoninah 3085:Yoninah 3081:Awsomaw 3067:Awsomaw 3036:Classic 3020:Awsomaw 3007:Awsomaw 2948:Yoninah 2937:Awsomaw 2912:Classic 2904:Awsomaw 2891:Awsomaw 2885:Yoninah 2852:Classic 2820:Awsomaw 2807:Awsomaw 2778:Classic 2745:Awsomaw 2730:Awsomaw 2722:Yoninah 2692:Yoninah 2688:Rule H2 2666:Awsomaw 2635:Classic 2625:Awsomaw 2610:Awsomaw 2551:Classic 2464:Awsomaw 2389:Comment 2293:Comment 2273:Yoninah 2197:Classic 2144:Classic 2100:Classic 2071:Classic 2007:Classic 1967:Classic 1959:version 1937:Classic 1897:Classic 1855:Classic 1578:Abyssal 1401:only = 778:Length? 592:in the 556:on the 529:Germany 520:Germany 476:Germany 427:on the 299:on the 147:history 39:defense 2997:taxa? 2994:taxons 2598:whose 1748:So is 190:scale. 101:Review 2449:genus 1690:from 1060:No.-- 171:This 141:with 35:color 3254:talk 3189:talk 3159:talk 3118:talk 3089:talk 3071:talk 3063:ALT4 3044:talk 3011:talk 2974:ALT4 2952:talk 2920:talk 2895:talk 2860:talk 2824:ALT3 2811:talk 2786:talk 2734:talk 2696:talk 2670:talk 2662:ALT2 2643:talk 2614:talk 2582:ALT2 2559:talk 2488:name 2468:talk 2437:only 2429:Alt1 2404:talk 2348:ALT1 2297:view 2277:talk 2205:talk 2170:talk 2152:talk 2130:talk 2108:talk 2079:talk 2015:talk 1993:talk 1975:talk 1945:talk 1923:talk 1905:talk 1882:talk 1863:talk 1847:this 1783:talk 1707:talk 1610:talk 1582:talk 1568:talk 1541:talk 1527:talk 1509:talk 1474:talk 1454:talk 1425:talk 1411:talk 1385:talk 1371:talk 1357:talk 1306:talk 1282:talk 1259:talk 1236:talk 1220:talk 1182:talk 1168:talk 1154:talk 1136:talk 1118:talk 1102:talk 1066:talk 1062:MWAK 1051:talk 792:talk 788:MWAK 748:talk 717:talk 548:High 419:High 389:and 291:High 3154:767 3039:767 2915:767 2855:767 2826:: " 2781:767 2638:767 2554:767 2295:or 2271:by 2254:or 2200:767 2147:767 2103:767 2074:767 2010:767 1970:767 1940:767 1900:767 1858:767 131:of 96:it. 3268:: 3256:) 3191:) 3165:) 3161:| 3120:) 3091:) 3073:) 3050:) 3046:| 3013:) 2954:) 2926:) 2922:| 2897:) 2866:) 2862:| 2813:) 2792:) 2788:| 2736:) 2724:. 2698:) 2672:) 2649:) 2645:| 2616:) 2584:: 2565:) 2561:| 2470:) 2288:( 2279:) 2250:, 2211:) 2207:| 2172:) 2158:) 2154:| 2132:) 2114:) 2110:| 2085:) 2081:| 2021:) 2017:| 1995:) 1981:) 1977:| 1951:) 1947:| 1925:) 1911:) 1907:| 1884:) 1869:) 1865:| 1785:) 1715:) 1612:) 1584:) 1570:) 1543:) 1529:) 1511:) 1476:) 1456:) 1427:) 1413:) 1405:. 1387:) 1373:) 1359:) 1308:) 1284:) 1261:) 1238:) 1222:) 1184:) 1170:) 1156:) 1138:) 1120:) 1104:) 1068:) 1053:) 997:= 990:= 981:= 974:= 965:= 958:= 951:= 944:= 935:= 926:= 917:= 910:= 903:= 894:= 887:= 878:= 869:= 860:= 843:= 834:= 794:) 765:P. 761:P. 750:) 719:) 705:. 455:). 351:: 327:). 216:: 110:). 41:, 37:, 3252:( 3214:" 3187:( 3157:( 3135:: 3131:@ 3116:( 3087:( 3069:( 3042:( 3009:( 2950:( 2939:: 2935:@ 2918:( 2893:( 2887:: 2883:@ 2858:( 2809:( 2784:( 2732:( 2694:( 2668:( 2641:( 2627:: 2623:@ 2612:( 2576:: 2572:@ 2557:( 2466:( 2410:. 2402:( 2350:: 2307:) 2275:( 2262:. 2203:( 2183:: 2179:@ 2168:( 2150:( 2128:( 2106:( 2077:( 2013:( 1991:( 1973:( 1943:( 1921:( 1903:( 1880:( 1861:( 1781:( 1752:. 1710:· 1705:( 1608:( 1580:( 1566:( 1539:( 1525:( 1507:( 1472:( 1452:( 1423:( 1409:( 1383:( 1369:( 1355:( 1304:( 1280:( 1257:( 1234:( 1218:( 1180:( 1166:( 1152:( 1134:( 1116:( 1100:( 1064:( 1049:( 822:= 790:( 754:. 746:( 723:. 715:( 634:. 560:. 431:. 303:. 196:: 57:.

Index


American English
varieties of English
relevant style guide
broad consensus
Good articles
Natural sciences good articles
good article criteria
please do so
reassess
Review
Reviewed version
this version
Pterodactylus
Aerodactylus
this edit
history
provide attribution
level-5 vital article
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Palaeontology
Pterosaurs
WikiProject icon
Paleontology portal
WikiProject Palaeontology
palaeontology
the discussion
High

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑