1291:: "Delaware's term may cause some confusion, as some states, such as California, use this term to refer to nonprofit corporations." Hence, the search results for "Public-Benefit Corporation" and "California" are so voluminous, because those search results are referring to the more common non-profit entity of California, as opposed to Delaware's public benefit corporation structure. IMO, Knowledge can make a big impact in helping to clear up all of this confusion by educating its readers. Hope this helps! Best regards.
106:
81:
1166:. "Benefit Corporation" is a general term for any legal entity in any state that is required to balance the interests of shareholders with the public. "Public-Benefit Corporation" is the term used by the state of Delaware for benefit corporations organized under Delaware state law. In corporate law, the state of Delaware is probably more important than all other states combined, because most large American companies are organized under Delaware law.
164:
92:
288:
270:
208:
190:
218:
298:
50:
116:
21:
372:
354:
916:
491:
benefit corporation" is a IRC 501(c)(3) tax-exempt nonprofit corporation, while a "mutual benefit corporation" is a nonprofit corporation that is either not tax-exempt or is tax-exempt under some IRC section other than 501(c)(3). This article needs to be fixed to show that New York's definition is an unusual one. --
846:
CG: These articles should not be merged. A public benefit corporation and a B-Corp are quite different (at least in the U.S.). A Public
Benefit Corporation, or sometimes just Benefit Corporation, includes a specific legal commitment in its State approved ByLaws. A B-Corp is any for-profit entity that
490:
It looks like the definition of "public benefit corporation" as used in this article reflects a definition unique to New York law (in the sense of implying that a public benefit corporation is essentially a form of state-controlled corporation). In many other states, including
California, a "public
1109:
Concur with User:Noaht2. I also want to belatedly voice my support at this point for User:Mastimido's sudden reduction of the article to two sentences. The better option would have been to expressly propose the reduction in advance, but it was clearly necessary because the existing article was an
1061:
I believe is neutral, properly cited to legal scholars, and an improvement over the current page. My hope is that more impartial editors will consider using all or part of the draft to jump-start the page, at which point it might continue to improve through the normal incremental process. The draft
744:
also use the term "Public-benefit corporation". We will need to work to make our terms and distinctions clear to readers; it's obviously not clear even to us! I'd love to see an existing reference work discuss these organization types rather than depending on sources which merely discuss one or the
537:
I have finally done some preliminary research on InfoTrac OneFile and ProQuest eLibrary. It appears that the most common and neutral terms for a corporation owned by the government are "government corporation" and "government-owned corporation." In most U.S. states, a "public benefit corporation"
1121:(see the ICANN articles of incorporation]). I am not a specialist in corporate law, but my vague understanding (which may be incorrect) is that part of the problem is that other states refused to follow the major reforms implemented by California due to the scandal arising out of
720:
is a type of for-profit corporate entity... that includes positive impact on society, workers, the community and the environment in addition to profit as its legally defined goals." These are organizations which seek to have beneficial social impacts and generate profit, but are
1117:, so as a result, the phrase is now used to describe two drastically different types of corporations. For example, in California, a "public benefit corporation" is a type of nonprofit corporation under the California Nonprofit Corporation Law. A well-known example of this is
847:
is certified by the nonprofit B Lab. As described by B Lab, "Certified B Corporations are businesses that meet the highest standards of verified social and environmental performance, public transparency, and legal accountability to balance profit and purpose"
1110:
utterly incoherent and unsalvageable mess. The only people with the advanced knowledge of comparative corporate law necessary to clean up such a mess are probably too busy serving their paying clients, so the next best option is to start over from scratch.
436:
The current version of the page already served the purpose of a disambiguation page, but was not using the style of a disambiguation page. I think in the new style it will be easier to use. I will move the examples of benefit corporations to the
923:
There is an entire other article about
Benefit corporations. This article is indeed a mess and so I am deleting most of it, leaving the explanation that the term is used in at least two very different ways depending on the jurisdiction.
700:
to an organization which is not, however, directly managed or funded by the government. I'm not sufficiently educated in political theory to precisely define government authority or responsibilities, but it has something to do with
1179:
The source material explains this, though not all that well. For example, Reuters says "'public benefit corporation,' a
Delaware legal structure gaining attention among would-be financial reformers." Citation 5 in
518:
Four months later. Still a mess. Sad. Very sad. This is the classic example of an orphan article because everyone is too busy cleaning up other articles to clean it up. In my opinion it would be better to
1113:
The underlying problem is that there is an irreconcilable split between jurisdictions over whether a "public benefit corporation" should be allowed to be for profit, or whether that very idea is an
501:
Wow, this article is still a mess. Unfortunately, I'm still way too busy with depositions and law and motion practice to deal with this. And my main
Knowledge priority at the moment is fixing the
725:. While they are trying to do "good" for society, their benefits needn't be "public" or be driven by a societal or political perspective, but can be directed towards their immediate neighbors.
31:
1415:
1405:
872:
I agree with the above edit. A Public
Benefit Corporation in the United States must meet several considerations to be a B Corp. I would vote against merging these two articles.
1410:
652:
538:
is simply a IRC 501(c)(3) tax-exempt nonprofit corporation that is run for the public benefit (but is not a government agency or even controlled or funded by the government).
1057:, a public benefit corporation, and therefore have a potential conflict of interest. Since the current page is only two sentences and has no citations, I wanted to share a
760:
Merge but understand that a Public
Benefit Corp is exactly the same thing as a Benefit Corp. In some jurisdictions Public Benefit Corps have quasi-govermental status.
995:
991:
977:
1455:
1440:
616:
558:
398:
1445:
862:
963:
1450:
1420:
1126:
1425:
832:
472:
394:
379:
359:
1430:
320:
172:
138:
1062:
also helps elaborate the difference between public benefit corporations and some similar concepts that have their own
Knowledge pages.
728:
There's been some confusion in these articles. Without checking the sources, I'm guessing
American Prison Data Systems, mentioned in
1435:
1188:
says on page 86: "(and most states) use the term 'benefit corporation' while
Delaware employs the term 'public benefit corporation'"
973:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1089:
596:
I am hesitant to delete other efforts, but this is a really bad article. I don't see anything worth saving - except the title.
887:
311:
275:
129:
86:
634:
This article is primarily a American article. Other article exist in Knowledge with different titles meaning the same thing.
1077:
1038:
858:
554:
542:
61:
688:
While these seem similar at a glance, I think there is a difference we should strive to make more clear. Consider the
825:. The articles describe the same corporate form (if you look at the statutes referenced, this is clearly the case).
696:, preserve and improve the Port of London." by an act of government stating "Authority is hereby given....". This is
1324:
1181:
1058:
947:
822:
729:
550:
1088:
thinks. (They cut the article down to two sentences.) If so, the article might as it is might as well be moved to
1374:
231:
195:
27:
1201:
In other words, "Public-benefit Corporation" is a type of benefit corporation adopted by the state of Delaware.
994:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
765:
689:
384:
1258:
836:
476:
1076:
I've read your draft and, although it explains the difference between a public-benefit corporation and a the
964:
https://web.archive.org/web/20151018122717/http://tornado.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/olls/sl2013a/sl_230.htm
854:
1225:
1029:
955:
750:
601:
235:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
137:
articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
49:
1296:
1206:
1067:
951:
741:
546:
1013:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1001:
706:
67:
954:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1266:
1134:
967:
875:
850:
828:
580:
566:
528:
438:
20:
1081:
929:
818:
802:
761:
733:
717:
642:
319:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
80:
1247:
883:
746:
702:
624:
597:
998:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1348:
1014:
605:
495:
1292:
1287:
1202:
1063:
903:
657:
1097:
446:
1021:
163:
1280:
1262:
1161:
1130:
710:
666:
576:
562:
524:
510:
502:
492:
303:
121:
1220:
There are plenty of potential citations for "Public-benefit corporation" & Delaware:
1300:
1270:
1251:
1210:
1138:
1101:
1085:
1071:
1043:
980:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
933:
925:
907:
891:
866:
840:
769:
754:
670:
628:
584:
570:
532:
513:
480:
450:
91:
1020:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
467:
Something is wrong with the linking of this page to the page in Hebrew - according to
297:
287:
269:
1399:
1243:
1122:
1054:
879:
679:
620:
456:
899:
523:
have an article like this, which is an incoherent mess, than to have it at all. --
1349:"ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS"
1084:. I have a suspicion that they are actually the same thing, which is what I think
505:
article and fighting off vandals on articles I've invested a lot of time in, like
207:
189:
1153:
1093:
987:
442:
217:
986:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
683:
662:
293:
223:
213:
111:
468:
115:
1114:
316:
134:
459:
has reverted the change. I have asked them to join the discussion here.
647:
506:
371:
353:
1118:
968:
http://tornado.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/olls/sl2013a/sl_230.htm
723:
in no way associated with government authority or responsibilities
545:, and then making this article into a disambiguation page between
1375:"JP Morgan's board rejects switch to stakeholder-focused entity"
692:
as the example of a Public-benefit corporation, established to "
1125:'s unsuccessful attempt to run for a seat on the board of the
709:, or a goal of impacting a whole society or economy, like the
236:
43:
15:
162:
958:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
541:
I propose moving most of the content in this article into
787:
389:
171:
This disambiguation page has been marked as needing an
397:, where you can join the project or contribute to the
698:
delegation of government authority and responsibility
653:
Independent agencies of the United States government
315:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
133:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1261:
for "public benefit corporation" and California. --
990:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
898:Closing, given the opposition and lack of support.
575:
Okay, it's been three weeks and no one objected. --
1080:, I don't understand the difference between and a
471:, this is not the right translation for the page.
387:pages on Knowledge. If you wish to help, you can
377:This disambiguation page is within the scope of
309:This disambiguation page is within the scope of
229:This disambiguation page is within the scope of
127:This disambiguation page is within the scope of
1416:WikiProject Business articles needing infoboxes
736:. The terminology is surely confusing, and the
1325:"Public Benefit Corporations are Going Public"
976:This message was posted before February 2018.
469:https://en.wikipedia.org/Voluntary_association
737:
8:
1406:Disambig-Class WikiProject Business articles
1411:NA-importance WikiProject Business articles
1090:Public-benefit-corporation (disambiguation)
383:, an attempt to structure and organize all
47:
946:I have just modified one external link on
873:
848:
826:
348:
264:
184:
75:
617:Talk:Public-benefit nonprofit corporation
559:New York State public benefit corporation
393:attached to this talk page, or visit the
60:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
730:Public-benefit corporation#United States
1315:
1226:""Public-benefit corporation" Delaware"
779:
350:
266:
186:
77:
1127:Automobile Club of Southern California
7:
407:Knowledge:WikiProject Disambiguation
410:Template:WikiProject Disambiguation
239:and the subjects encompassed by it.
66:It is of interest to the following
1323:P.C., Jackson Lewis (2021-03-02).
790:Public-benefit corporation#History
762:The Columbian Journalism Librarian
30:on 25 October 2021. The result of
14:
1288:Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
1186:Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
950:. Please take a moment to review
1456:WikiProject Disambiguation pages
1441:Disambig-Class politics articles
914:
463:Problem with Hebrew-English term
370:
352:
296:
286:
268:
216:
206:
188:
114:
104:
90:
79:
48:
19:
1446:NA-importance politics articles
26:This article was nominated for
432:Changed to disambiguation page
329:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
147:Knowledge:WikiProject Business
1:
1451:WikiProject Politics articles
1421:WikiProject Business articles
934:17:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
615:There is a merge proposal at
606:20:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
571:07:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
533:16:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
481:21:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
332:Template:WikiProject Politics
323:and see a list of open tasks.
153:WikiProject Business articles
150:Template:WikiProject Business
141:and see a list of open tasks.
1044:04:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
908:23:18, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
892:22:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
867:15:11, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
555:Government-owned corporation
543:Government-owned corporation
514:06:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
1426:Disambig-Class law articles
1373:Kerber, Ross (2021-02-09).
1078:B Corporation certification
671:08:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
1472:
1431:NA-importance law articles
1271:18:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
1252:17:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
1211:03:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
1139:19:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
1102:16:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
1007:(last update: 5 June 2024)
948:Public-benefit corporation
943:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
912:
823:Public-benefit corporation
770:22:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
585:09:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
551:Not-for-profit corporation
380:WikiProject Disambiguation
1301:21:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
1072:22:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
629:21:48, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
365:
281:
245:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
201:
170:
99:
74:
1436:WikiProject Law articles
1053:I work in marketing for
841:21:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
755:20:43, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
690:Port of London Authority
496:06:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
486:This article isn't right
248:Template:WikiProject Law
1329:The National Law Review
939:External links modified
742:501(c)(3) organizations
451:10:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
413:Disambiguation articles
1257:And there are roughly
716:On the other hand, "a
547:Nonprofit organization
167:
707:common-pool resources
561:. Any objections? --
485:
166:
988:regular verification
439:Benefit corporations
312:WikiProject Politics
130:WikiProject Business
1285:. According to the
1259:three times as many
1082:benefit corporation
978:After February 2018
819:Benefit Corporation
803:Benefit corporation
734:Benefit Corporation
718:benefit corporation
643:Statutory authority
58:disambiguation page
1182:the draft I shared
1049:Proposed revisions
1032:InternetArchiveBot
983:InternetArchiveBot
855:ColoradoGeneralist
745:other separately.
740:demonstrates that
703:natural monopolies
168:
62:content assessment
1008:
894:
878:comment added by
869:
853:comment added by
843:
831:comment added by
658:Regulatory agency
621:Pontiff Greg Bard
429:
428:
425:
424:
421:
420:
347:
346:
343:
342:
335:politics articles
263:
262:
259:
258:
183:
182:
179:
178:
42:
41:
1463:
1389:
1388:
1386:
1385:
1370:
1364:
1363:
1361:
1360:
1345:
1339:
1338:
1336:
1335:
1320:
1284:
1239:
1237:
1236:
1165:
1157:
1042:
1033:
1006:
1005:
984:
918:
917:
805:
800:
794:
793:
788:Old revision of
784:
738:above discussion
732:, is actually a
687:
415:
414:
411:
408:
405:
392:
374:
367:
366:
356:
349:
337:
336:
333:
330:
327:
306:
301:
300:
290:
283:
282:
272:
265:
253:
252:
249:
246:
243:
226:
221:
220:
210:
203:
202:
192:
185:
155:
154:
151:
148:
145:
124:
119:
118:
108:
101:
100:
95:
94:
93:
83:
76:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
1471:
1470:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1383:
1381:
1372:
1371:
1367:
1358:
1356:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1333:
1331:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1278:
1234:
1232:
1224:
1159:
1151:
1059:potential draft
1051:
1036:
1031:
999:
992:have permission
982:
956:this simple FaQ
941:
921:
920:
915:
821:be merged into
817:I propose that
815:
813:Merger Proposal
810:
809:
808:
801:
797:
786:
785:
781:
711:Federal Reserve
677:
613:
503:Attorney at law
488:
465:
434:
412:
409:
406:
403:
402:
388:
334:
331:
328:
325:
324:
304:Politics portal
302:
295:
250:
247:
244:
241:
240:
232:WikiProject Law
222:
215:
152:
149:
146:
143:
142:
122:Business portal
120:
113:
89:
12:
11:
5:
1469:
1467:
1459:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1398:
1397:
1391:
1390:
1365:
1340:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1241:
1240:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1111:
1050:
1047:
1026:
1025:
1018:
971:
970:
962:Added archive
940:
937:
913:
911:
910:
833:207.237.168.50
814:
811:
807:
806:
795:
778:
777:
773:
758:
757:
726:
714:
674:
673:
667:Chinwag Podium
660:
655:
650:
645:
636:
635:
612:
611:Merge proposal
609:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
539:
487:
484:
473:147.236.176.90
464:
461:
433:
430:
427:
426:
423:
422:
419:
418:
416:
404:Disambiguation
385:disambiguation
375:
363:
362:
360:Disambiguation
357:
345:
344:
341:
340:
338:
321:the discussion
308:
307:
291:
279:
278:
273:
261:
260:
257:
256:
254:
228:
227:
211:
199:
198:
193:
181:
180:
177:
176:
169:
159:
158:
156:
139:the discussion
126:
125:
109:
97:
96:
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1468:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1403:
1401:
1380:
1376:
1369:
1366:
1354:
1350:
1344:
1341:
1330:
1326:
1319:
1316:
1312:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1282:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1231:
1230:Google Search
1227:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1187:
1183:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1163:
1155:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1123:Marvin Braude
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1056:
1055:Veeva Systems
1048:
1046:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1034:
1023:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1003:
997:
993:
989:
985:
979:
974:
969:
965:
961:
960:
959:
957:
953:
949:
944:
938:
936:
935:
931:
927:
909:
905:
901:
897:
896:
895:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
870:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
844:
842:
838:
834:
830:
824:
820:
812:
804:
799:
796:
792:
791:
783:
780:
776:
772:
771:
767:
763:
756:
752:
748:
747:Sondra.kinsey
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
724:
719:
715:
712:
708:
704:
699:
695:
691:
685:
681:
676:
675:
672:
668:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
640:
639:
633:
632:
631:
630:
626:
622:
618:
610:
608:
607:
603:
599:
598:Gadickson2002
586:
582:
578:
574:
573:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
522:
517:
516:
515:
512:
508:
504:
500:
499:
498:
497:
494:
483:
482:
478:
474:
470:
462:
460:
458:
457:User:Onel5969
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
431:
417:
400:
396:
391:
390:edit the page
386:
382:
381:
376:
373:
369:
368:
364:
361:
358:
355:
351:
339:
322:
318:
314:
313:
305:
299:
294:
292:
289:
285:
284:
280:
277:
274:
271:
267:
255:
238:
234:
233:
225:
219:
214:
212:
209:
205:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
187:
174:
165:
161:
160:
157:
140:
136:
132:
131:
123:
117:
112:
110:
107:
103:
102:
98:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
59:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1382:. Retrieved
1378:
1368:
1357:. Retrieved
1355:. 2012-02-25
1352:
1343:
1332:. Retrieved
1328:
1318:
1310:
1293:Meaganbusath
1286:
1242:
1233:. Retrieved
1229:
1219:
1203:Meaganbusath
1185:
1075:
1064:Meaganbusath
1052:
1030:
1027:
1002:source check
981:
975:
972:
945:
942:
922:
874:— Preceding
871:
849:— Preceding
845:
827:— Preceding
816:
798:
789:
782:
774:
759:
722:
697:
693:
637:
614:
595:
520:
489:
466:
454:
435:
395:project page
378:
310:
251:law articles
230:
128:
68:WikiProjects
57:
36:no consensus
35:
237:legal field
1400:Categories
1384:2021-03-31
1359:2021-03-31
1334:2021-03-31
1311:References
1281:Coolcaesar
1263:Coolcaesar
1235:2021-03-31
1162:Coolcaesar
1131:Coolcaesar
1039:Report bug
775:References
694:administer
577:Coolcaesar
563:Coolcaesar
525:Coolcaesar
511:Coolcaesar
493:Coolcaesar
399:discussion
224:Law portal
1184:from the
1086:Mastimido
1022:this tool
1015:this tool
926:Mastimido
1244:Peaceray
1115:oxymoron
1028:Cheers.—
919:Resolved
888:contribs
880:Asparish
876:unsigned
863:contribs
851:unsigned
829:unsigned
680:Gregbard
455:Update:
326:Politics
317:politics
276:Politics
144:Business
135:business
87:Business
28:deletion
952:my edit
900:Klbrain
173:infobox
1154:Noaht2
1094:Noaht2
648:Quango
507:Lawyer
443:Delius
441:page.
64:scale.
1353:ICANN
1129:. --
1119:ICANN
684:Visik
663:Visik
638:e.g.
56:This
1297:talk
1267:talk
1248:talk
1207:talk
1158:and
1135:talk
1098:talk
1068:talk
930:talk
904:talk
884:talk
859:talk
837:talk
766:talk
751:talk
682:and
625:talk
602:talk
581:talk
567:talk
529:talk
509:. --
477:talk
447:talk
34:was
1379:U.S
1277:Hi
996:RfC
966:to
521:not
242:Law
196:Law
1402::
1377:.
1351:.
1327:.
1299:)
1269:)
1250:)
1228:.
1209:)
1137:)
1100:)
1092:.
1070:)
1009:.
1004:}}
1000:{{
932:)
906:)
890:)
886:•
865:)
861:•
839:)
768:)
753:)
705:,
669:)
627:)
604:)
583:)
569:)
557:,
553:,
549:,
531:)
479:)
449:)
1387:.
1362:.
1337:.
1295:(
1283::
1279:@
1265:(
1246:(
1238:.
1205:(
1164::
1160:@
1156::
1152:@
1133:(
1096:(
1066:(
1041:)
1037:(
1024:.
1017:.
928:(
902:(
882:(
857:(
835:(
764:(
749:(
713:.
686::
678:@
665:(
623:(
619:.
600:(
579:(
565:(
527:(
475:(
445:(
401:.
175:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
