769:
what these series really represent? Seems to me
Calculus is not quite enough. I wrote Laurent series because there is a very close connection between Laurent's Theorem and Puiseux series, an important one I think, and should be explained somewhere in the article and just mentioning it in the lead is a first exposure. I specifically gave a real example of evaluating the series, using a specific root and explaining the conjugate series, to relax the reader as many are intimidated by multi-valued functions and giving a simple practical example they can understand gives them confidence to proceed further. Perhaps I could omit the term "conjugate" as that may be a bit too technical for the lead but I do feel explaining how to practically evaluate the series sometime soon in the discussion is helpful.
817:
year of calculus should in principle be able to understand what is a
Puiseux series, and even the content of Puiseux's theorem, and therefore we should aspire to introduce those basic ideas using terminology that would not unnecessarily exclude those potential readers. Speaking personally, I have no training in complex analysis (I mean, I took some classes as an undergraduate nearly 2 decades ago that did not mention Puiseux series, as far as I recall), but I occasionally come across (formal) Puiseux series in my work, so your description of the audience excludes even some PhD-holding professional research mathematicians who might be interested in the article content. --
84:
74:
53:
1340:
geometry and
Puiseux series can help with that. The problem of course is most everyone is intimidated by the fractional powers and more so when they are combined into an extremely complex object like the algebraic curve of f(x,y)=0. But this can be mitigated if the principles are presented in an intuitive and easy to follow manner by anyone interested in Complex Analysis. This I can do as I hope I did with the edit suggestions I made of the first paragraph above.
1678:
784:
article to readers who have heard of it and do not remember exactly the definition. I agree with JBL that the current version better fills these requirement than yours. In particular, as everyone who knows what a
Laurent series knows also what a power series is, "power series" must be preferred to "Laurent series" in the first paragraph, even if it is worth to mention them later in the introduction, as it is done now.
22:
263:
768:
Puiseux series are distinguished by their fractional powers. That is a quintessential feature of the series quite different from power series with integer exponents. Is it unreasonable to expect readers to have some background in
Complex Variables/Analysis to have any real success in understanding
500:
This sentence belongs to a subsection of section "Puiseux expansion of algebraic curves and functions", and thus concern only
Puiseux expansion of algebraic curves. In this case, the statement is true. Similarly, the divergent Taylor expansion are always Taylor expansions of transcendental functions.
1617:
or at least one which fully ramifies to better exhibit a conjugate class and include either links to the Newton
Polygon algorithm or a short discussion. Next show some actual calculations using the series, especially convergence examples. Include a plot or two of the beautiful underlying geometry.
1399:. By the way, this section begins with two errors: by excluding branches with a vertical tangent, and, in the second paragraph by identifying a branch with a point (incidently, it is not here that normalization must be considered, as it suffices to define, as usually, a branch as an analytic curve).
521:
I am hesitant to go in and change the article however
Puiseux series are intimidating to most everyone who encounters them and beginning the discussion here with an abstract description only frightens them further. Better to slowly ease them in with an undergraduate introduction to appeal to a much
258:
I was the one who placed the âtoo technicalâ template. I was redirected to this page from âPuiseux theorem,â to find out that the article only gives the âmodern,â very algebraic statements. But more elementary theory does exist, and the discussion of it should precede the more âmodernâ formulations.
1475:
OK for the vertical tangent. But this shows that the section is very badly written, as it may confuse readers who well know the subject. The sentence "let us define the branches of X at p to be the points ..." is definitively an identification of branches with some points. This could make sense if
1704:
Did anyone check the links? For the last link (Algebraic Curves, R.J. Walker) I thought that I downloaded the book several days ago. But now when I open it, I see that it leads to a site where I should download it. The url type says that I need to register (that's why I didn't remove this link) -
1339:
Another example is studying the branching geometry at singular points other than zero important for studying contour integration over these functions. Consider the pochhammer contour for the beta function. This is a difficult concept to understand without a clear understanding of the underlying
816:
You titled this section "Some suggestions for appealing to a wider audience". Appealing to as wide an audience as possible is a great idea; insisting that the audience must share your particular background and perspective is the opposite of that. It's quite clear that students who have taken one
783:
The article introduction is not for expressing the quintessence of a subject, but for summarizing the article and providing information that allows readers to decide whether they want read the article further. When technically possible, the introduction must also recall what is the subject of the
692:. And therefore this series actually represents three (single-valued) series which make up a single conjugate class of Puiseux series. The other two series of this class can be obtained by conjugation or most often computed by the usual method of Newton Polygon (see below for more information).
745:
I do not think this is an improvement. Power series are familiar to every single-variable calculus student (at least in the US), whereas
Laurent series are almost never met (at least under that name) until later. Puiseux series need not be evaluated / evaluable (formal Puiseux series are a
1335:
Ok, how about just state the expansion can be at any point but is frequently done at the origin. I think presenting the expansion at any point in the lead while perhaps focusing initially at the origin does not add unnecessary complexity and prepares the reader for a more comprehensive
1657:
Hello everyone, it seems confusing the way the completeness of
Puiseux series is explained. Would someone (who is confortable enough with this subject) please explain better why the completeness is claimed for Puiseux series, then contradicted in the generalization section ?
1460:
has a branch point at the origin with a vertical tangent. Also I do not see where a branch is being identified with a point. My example refers implicitly to a 3-cycle branch defined locally by three single-valued Puiseux series. Can you explain a bit further
1621:
I can do this work which would in my opinion break a long-standing ice jam with this subject and attract further interest and discovery about this very beautiful subject so ask everyone associated with this topic to allow me to propose changes for your review.
1336:
understanding. Consider Runge's Theorem which studies expansions centered at infinity. Casually and briefly mentioning this Theorem in the discussion for example gives a concrete application of Puiseux series and may interest the reader to pursue this further.
746:
perfectly reasonable object), and the technicalities thereof hardly seem lead-worthy. Compared with the trivial matter of what to call the variable, these are much larger issues. (I wouldn't object to changing the variable to
221:
1615:
666:
1024:
140:
391:
I am also concerned with the excessive focus on the abstract algebra properties of the series and the omission of Puiseux's theorem, which I think more readers would be interested in.--
1058:
1458:
372:
I believe that I have solved, for the lead, the "too technical" issue. I have left the tag, because some work is yet needed in the body of the article. In particular the use of
438:
1319:
1160:
311:
1385:
1286:
814:
Is it unreasonable to expect readers to have some background in Complex Variables/Analysis to have any real success in understanding what these series really represent?
1230:
1195:
924:
480:
690:
351:
331:
1255:
It seems that the only difference with the current version is that Puiseux expansion are considered in the neighborhood of any point. As series Puiseux in
1749:
130:
1744:
1719:, but could not find any security policy in this case (and what if the link just changes - should we register ourselves to check that it is safe?..)
106:
847:
Copy that. I see some changes have already been made which I feel is an improvement. However, I feel one statement can be improved further.
723:
1387:
are important. But here we are in the lead, and is it standard, in an article introduction, to avoid, as possible, technical details (see
486:
357:
The book proceeds to âgive several versions of this theorem, of increasing sharpness.â I think this article should follow that example.
1662:
97:
58:
1476:
the language of schemes would be assumed, but this is not the case, and it must not be the case if a wide audience is desired.
165:
1506:
259:
I may rewrite the introductory sections of the article myself, but in the meantime, here is a suggestion on how to proceed.
567:
1395:). This suggest to detail Puiseux expansions outside the origin in a specific section that could be a first subsection of
33:
1413:
Ok, thanks for that reference. I do not see where branches with vertical tangents are being excluded. My example of
1202:
929:
376:
to expand as Puiseux series the solutions of a bivariate equation should be explained and illustrated by examples.
1726:
1637:
This sounds to me like a good thing to have in the article, and a bad thing to have in the lead of the article. --
21:
787:
As two editors prefer the current version, please discuss (if needed) the current version rather than yours.
1722:
1666:
541:
The "T" only distracts from an already difficult subject. Use x. Also, would be more clear if written as:
490:
868:
Original statement: (possibly zero excluded, in the case of a solution that tends to the infinity at when
228:
441:
395:
39:
1029:
83:
1416:
223:
does not converge. This is to explain why I just deleted the completeness claim from the main page. --
1642:
1623:
1462:
1341:
1241:
1119:
1061:
822:
770:
755:
693:
523:
415:
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1689:
1627:
1481:
1466:
1404:
1345:
1326:
1245:
1083:
1065:
792:
774:
697:
527:
506:
381:
243:
89:
1291:
73:
52:
262:
A good place to find a contemporary presentation of the elementary theory seems to be the book
1198:
224:
1124:
275:
1357:
1258:
392:
1233:
1208:
1173:
362:
900:
897:
Recommended change: "(zero excluded in the case of expansion about a pole). For example
455:
1638:
1396:
1075:
818:
751:
561:
553:
373:
1677:
675:
336:
316:
1738:
1685:
1477:
1400:
1322:
1079:
788:
502:
377:
239:
557:
1026:
has a pole at the origin so the Puiseux series for at least one branch contains a
1321:
outside the lead. However, the current formulation can (and should) be improved.
238:
This is not a Puiseux series, the denominators in the exponents being unbounded.
545:
102:
1074:
This does not belong to the lead, but will be worth to include in the section
440:, i.e. the field of complex numbers, the Puiseux expansions defined above are
358:
79:
1716:
1712:
1392:
1388:
1730:
1693:
1670:
1646:
1631:
1485:
1470:
1408:
1349:
1330:
1249:
1087:
1069:
826:
796:
778:
759:
701:
531:
510:
494:
398:
385:
366:
254:
A suggestion on how to start making this article more widely accessible
247:
232:
268:
by C. T. C. Wall. The first sentence of Chapter 2 in that book says:
1708:
Do people check these links or are they just scam / fishing / fraud?
522:
more wide audience, then follow with the more advanced description.
556:
that allow for fractional exponents. They were first introduced by
672:. The entire series is evaluated using a chosen cube root of
15:
408:
I am confused by this statement (in "Analytic convergence").
272:
The theorem of Puiseux states that a polynomial equation
216:{\displaystyle \sum _{k=2}^{\infty }w^{k+{\frac {1}{k}}}}
1288:
are not defined before, it seem better to keep the case
1610:{\displaystyle F(x,y)=1+(x+x^{2})y+(3x^{2}+x^{3})y^{3}}
537:
First paragraph about Puiseux series should be improved
333:
is expressed as a power series in fractional powers of
1104:
Second paragraph in my opinion is not worded correctly
661:{\displaystyle g(x)=1+x^{1/3}+x^{2/3}+x^{5/3}+\cdots }
1509:
1419:
1360:
1294:
1261:
1211:
1176:
1127:
1032:
932:
903:
678:
570:
458:
418:
339:
319:
278:
168:
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1609:
1452:
1379:
1313:
1280:
1224:
1189:
1170:, can be expanded as Puiseux series about a point
1154:
1052:
1018:
918:
684:
660:
517:Some suggestions for appealing to a wider audience
485:Indeed this is wrong even for formal power series.
474:
432:
345:
325:
305:
215:
501:I have edited the article to clarify this point.
158:Counterexample for completeness of Puiseux series
1078:, when this section will be correctly written.
1019:{\displaystyle f(x,y)=1+(2+x)y+xy^{2}+xy^{3}=0}
722:harvtxt error: no target: CITEREFNewton1960 (
8:
19:
47:
1601:
1588:
1575:
1550:
1508:
1434:
1430:
1418:
1371:
1359:
1299:
1293:
1272:
1260:
1216:
1210:
1181:
1175:
1126:
1042:
1033:
1031:
1004:
988:
931:
902:
677:
642:
638:
621:
617:
600:
596:
569:
467:
459:
457:
426:
425:
417:
338:
318:
277:
201:
194:
184:
173:
167:
444:in the sense that for a given choice of
711:
49:
1684:. Good point; thanks for pointing it.
813:
718:
1232:. In other words, every branch of an
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
1500:Next follow with a specific example
38:It is of interest to the following
1053:{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{x^{p}}}}
185:
14:
1750:Low-priority mathematics articles
1453:{\displaystyle 1+x^{1/3}+\cdots }
1240:) described by a Puiseux series.
564:in 1850. For example, the series
452:, they converge for small enough
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
1745:Start-Class mathematics articles
1676:
1060:term so is undefined at zero."
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
1354:I agree that Puiseux series in
265:Singular points of plane curves
135:This article has been rated as
1594:
1565:
1556:
1537:
1525:
1513:
1143:
1131:
972:
960:
948:
936:
913:
907:
580:
574:
468:
460:
433:{\displaystyle K=\mathbb {C} }
294:
282:
1:
1694:18:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
1671:17:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
1393:MOS:MATH#Article introduction
399:06:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
109:and see a list of open tasks.
1705:first I didn't notice that.
1647:19:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
1632:11:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
1486:13:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
1471:12:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
1409:16:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
1350:16:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
1331:13:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
1250:11:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
1236:may be locally (in terms of
1114:, sometimes also called the
1088:15:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1070:14:57, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
827:14:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
797:13:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
779:12:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
760:19:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
702:11:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
560:in 1676 and rediscovered by
532:11:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
386:12:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
248:12:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
1731:23:12, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
1314:{\displaystyle x_{0}\neq 0}
1766:
1166:, viewed as functions of
511:10:42, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
495:09:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
367:16:53, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
134:
67:
46:
1155:{\displaystyle P(x,y)=0}
1118:, asserts that, given a
1076:§ NewtonâPuiseux theorem
926:given by the expression
552:are a generalization of
313:has a solution in which
306:{\displaystyle f(x,y)=0}
233:01:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
162:For example, the series
141:project's priority scale
1700:pdfs with registration?
1380:{\displaystyle x-x_{0}}
1281:{\displaystyle x-x_{0}}
668:is a Puiseux series in
98:WikiProject Mathematics
1611:
1454:
1381:
1315:
1282:
1226:
1191:
1156:
1116:NewtonâPuiseux theorem
1054:
1020:
920:
686:
662:
483:
476:
434:
347:
327:
307:
217:
189:
28:This article is rated
1653:Completeness property
1612:
1455:
1382:
1316:
1283:
1227:
1225:{\displaystyle x_{0}}
1192:
1190:{\displaystyle x_{0}}
1157:
1055:
1021:
921:
687:
663:
477:
435:
410:
348:
328:
308:
218:
169:
1507:
1417:
1358:
1292:
1259:
1209:
1174:
1125:
1030:
930:
919:{\displaystyle y(x)}
901:
736:Puiseux (1850, 1851)
676:
568:
456:
416:
337:
317:
276:
166:
121:mathematics articles
1162:, its solutions in
1120:polynomial equation
475:{\displaystyle |x|}
1723:Yaroslav Nikitenko
1607:
1450:
1397:§ Algebraic curves
1377:
1311:
1278:
1222:
1187:
1152:
1050:
1016:
916:
682:
658:
472:
430:
343:
323:
303:
213:
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
1112:Puiseux's theorem
1048:
685:{\displaystyle x}
346:{\displaystyle x}
326:{\displaystyle y}
209:
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
1757:
1680:
1616:
1614:
1613:
1608:
1606:
1605:
1593:
1592:
1580:
1579:
1555:
1554:
1459:
1457:
1456:
1451:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1386:
1384:
1383:
1378:
1376:
1375:
1320:
1318:
1317:
1312:
1304:
1303:
1287:
1285:
1284:
1279:
1277:
1276:
1239:
1231:
1229:
1228:
1223:
1221:
1220:
1196:
1194:
1193:
1188:
1186:
1185:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1159:
1158:
1153:
1059:
1057:
1056:
1051:
1049:
1047:
1046:
1034:
1025:
1023:
1022:
1017:
1009:
1008:
993:
992:
925:
923:
922:
917:
875:
871:
737:
734:
728:
727:
716:
691:
689:
688:
683:
667:
665:
664:
659:
651:
650:
646:
630:
629:
625:
609:
608:
604:
481:
479:
478:
473:
471:
463:
439:
437:
436:
431:
429:
404:Wrong statement?
352:
350:
349:
344:
332:
330:
329:
324:
312:
310:
309:
304:
222:
220:
219:
214:
212:
211:
210:
202:
188:
183:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1765:
1764:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1735:
1734:
1702:
1655:
1597:
1584:
1571:
1546:
1505:
1504:
1502:
1426:
1415:
1414:
1367:
1356:
1355:
1295:
1290:
1289:
1268:
1257:
1256:
1237:
1234:algebraic curve
1212:
1207:
1206:
1177:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1123:
1122:
1106:
1038:
1028:
1027:
1000:
984:
928:
927:
899:
898:
873:
869:
742:
741:
740:
735:
731:
721:
717:
713:
674:
673:
634:
613:
592:
566:
565:
539:
519:
454:
453:
414:
413:
406:
335:
334:
315:
314:
274:
273:
256:
190:
164:
163:
160:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1763:
1761:
1753:
1752:
1747:
1737:
1736:
1701:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1661:Best regards.
1654:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1567:
1564:
1561:
1558:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1542:
1539:
1536:
1533:
1530:
1527:
1524:
1521:
1518:
1515:
1512:
1501:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1449:
1446:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1422:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1363:
1337:
1310:
1307:
1302:
1298:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1264:
1219:
1215:
1184:
1180:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1133:
1130:
1105:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1015:
1012:
1007:
1003:
999:
996:
991:
987:
983:
980:
977:
974:
971:
968:
965:
962:
959:
956:
953:
950:
947:
944:
941:
938:
935:
915:
912:
909:
906:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
785:
763:
762:
750:, though.) --
739:
738:
729:
710:
709:
705:
681:
657:
654:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
588:
585:
582:
579:
576:
573:
562:Victor Puiseux
554:Laurent series
550:Puiseux series
538:
535:
518:
515:
514:
513:
470:
466:
462:
428:
424:
421:
405:
402:
389:
388:
374:Newton polygon
355:
354:
342:
322:
302:
299:
296:
293:
290:
287:
284:
281:
255:
252:
251:
250:
208:
205:
200:
197:
193:
187:
182:
179:
176:
172:
159:
156:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1762:
1751:
1748:
1746:
1743:
1742:
1740:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1718:
1714:
1709:
1706:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1659:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1619:
1602:
1598:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1562:
1559:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1540:
1534:
1531:
1528:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1510:
1499:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1447:
1444:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1420:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1361:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1338:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1308:
1305:
1300:
1296:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1262:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1235:
1217:
1213:
1204:
1203:neighbourhood
1200:
1182:
1178:
1149:
1146:
1140:
1137:
1134:
1128:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1103:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1013:
1010:
1005:
1001:
997:
994:
989:
985:
981:
978:
975:
969:
966:
963:
957:
954:
951:
945:
942:
939:
933:
910:
904:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
828:
824:
820:
815:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
781:
780:
776:
772:
767:
766:
765:
764:
761:
757:
753:
749:
744:
743:
733:
730:
725:
720:
719:Newton (1960)
715:
712:
708:
704:
703:
699:
695:
679:
671:
655:
652:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
586:
583:
577:
571:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
542:
536:
534:
533:
529:
525:
516:
512:
508:
504:
499:
498:
497:
496:
492:
488:
487:128.178.14.87
482:
464:
451:
447:
443:
422:
419:
409:
403:
401:
400:
397:
394:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:
369:
368:
364:
360:
340:
320:
300:
297:
291:
288:
285:
279:
271:
270:
269:
267:
266:
260:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
230:
226:
206:
203:
198:
195:
191:
180:
177:
174:
170:
157:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1721:
1711:I looked up
1710:
1707:
1703:
1681:
1663:79.95.86.167
1660:
1656:
1620:
1503:
1115:
1111:
1110:
1107:
747:
732:
714:
706:
669:
558:Isaac Newton
549:
543:
540:
520:
484:
449:
448:-th root of
445:
411:
407:
390:
356:
264:
261:
257:
225:Thomas Bliem
161:
137:Low-priority
136:
96:
62:Lowâpriority
40:WikiProjects
1108:Recommend:
546:mathematics
393:Jasper Deng
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
30:Start-class
1739:Categories
1199:convergent
707:References
442:convergent
1717:Help:Link
1197:that are
872:tends to
1713:Help:URL
1686:D.Lazard
1624:Youriens
1478:D.Lazard
1463:Youriens
1401:D.Lazard
1389:MOS:LEAD
1342:Youriens
1323:D.Lazard
1242:Youriens
1201:in some
1080:D.Lazard
1062:Youriens
789:D.Lazard
771:Youriens
694:Youriens
524:Youriens
503:D.Lazard
378:D.Lazard
240:D.Lazard
1461:please?
139:on the
396:(talk)
36:scale.
1682:Fixed
412:When
359:Reuqr
1727:talk
1715:and
1690:talk
1667:talk
1643:talk
1628:talk
1482:talk
1467:talk
1405:talk
1391:and
1346:talk
1327:talk
1246:talk
1084:talk
1066:talk
823:talk
793:talk
775:talk
756:talk
724:help
698:talk
528:talk
507:talk
491:talk
382:talk
363:talk
244:talk
229:talk
1639:JBL
1205:of
819:JBL
752:JBL
544:In
131:Low
1741::
1729:)
1692:)
1669:)
1645:)
1630:)
1484:)
1469:)
1448:âŻ
1407:)
1365:â
1348:)
1329:)
1306:â
1266:â
1248:)
1086:)
1068:)
876:).
825:)
795:)
777:)
758:)
700:)
656:âŻ
548:,
530:)
509:)
493:)
384:)
365:)
246:)
231:)
186:â
171:â
1725:(
1688:(
1665:(
1641:(
1626:(
1603:3
1599:y
1595:)
1590:3
1586:x
1582:+
1577:2
1573:x
1569:3
1566:(
1563:+
1560:y
1557:)
1552:2
1548:x
1544:+
1541:x
1538:(
1535:+
1532:1
1529:=
1526:)
1523:y
1520:,
1517:x
1514:(
1511:F
1480:(
1465:(
1445:+
1440:3
1436:/
1432:1
1428:x
1424:+
1421:1
1403:(
1373:0
1369:x
1362:x
1344:(
1325:(
1309:0
1301:0
1297:x
1274:0
1270:x
1263:x
1244:(
1238:x
1218:0
1214:x
1183:0
1179:x
1168:x
1164:y
1150:0
1147:=
1144:)
1141:y
1138:,
1135:x
1132:(
1129:P
1082:(
1064:(
1044:p
1040:x
1036:1
1014:0
1011:=
1006:3
1002:y
998:x
995:+
990:2
986:y
982:x
979:+
976:y
973:)
970:x
967:+
964:2
961:(
958:+
955:1
952:=
949:)
946:y
943:,
940:x
937:(
934:f
914:)
911:x
908:(
905:y
874:0
870:x
821:(
791:(
773:(
754:(
748:x
726:)
696:(
680:x
670:x
653:+
648:3
644:/
640:5
636:x
632:+
627:3
623:/
619:2
615:x
611:+
606:3
602:/
598:1
594:x
590:+
587:1
584:=
581:)
578:x
575:(
572:g
526:(
505:(
489:(
469:|
465:x
461:|
450:x
446:n
427:C
423:=
420:K
380:(
361:(
353:.
341:x
321:y
301:0
298:=
295:)
292:y
289:,
286:x
283:(
280:f
242:(
227:(
207:k
204:1
199:+
196:k
192:w
181:2
178:=
175:k
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
