Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Royaldutchshellplc.com

Source 📝

696:
are not involved in any commercial activity of any kind and therefore have no commercial activity to promote. The link is purely for verification purposes. No one is forced to use it or read any of the information in the article. Even though now gutted of a considerable amount of content, some of which I intend to put forward again here in a briefer form with acceptable links, the article still provides important evidence of the impact a low cost gripe site can have on a major company. The activity is entirely lawful and has been praised by independent parties such as the One World Trust, a charitable organisation linked to the UN and the Houses of Parliament. That was some of the information removed by you. I have no idea why you are so intent in censoring the content as you have done, also removing content which had verification links which fully meet Knowledge (XXG) standards e.g. the information about Shell employee safety issues.
338: 311: 398: 280: 434: 219: 485:
editor has dealt with the proposed changes. The slimmed down version of the article is undoubtedly much tidier, better written, more professionally presented and is now compliant with Knowledge (XXG) standards and guidelines. All due credit to Eustress. It is however in my humble opinion no where near as informative as the .
484:
Because of my direct involvement in the website which is the subject of this article, I will give 4 weeks notice here of my proposed changes to the content either to correct existing content or update the article with new information. I will make the changes after the 4 week notice period if no other
695:
Eustress, the current information is inaccurate. The Star Trek information proves that this is this case. Why do you want to have inaccurate information in an online encyclopaedia? Neither is it self-promoting. That allegation is entirely without foundation. Both my father and I are long retired. We
773:
Eustress, I have checked out the "request for comment" page. Use of the facility seems inappropriate and a waste of time when the only text dispute is between two people over eight words. Please end the relevant sentence as you suggest with "and early 1990s". I would then put a verification link on
733:
I draw attention to the fact that my father Alfred Donovan passed away in 2013 as can be confirmed from The Guardian article "Strange tale of Shell's pipeline battle, the Gardaí and £30,000 of booze". Please forgive me for errors and omissions and for not signing off correctly. I no longer remember
753:
I thought it had been agreed after a referral to the COI notice board that I would give four weeks notice here on proposed changes to the article and that if no one objected, I would then make the changes. The editor known as Eustress has prescribed otherwise. He appears from his editing record to
881:
Doh, I got the wrong end of the stick, sorry. Yes there's clearly some info in there which can be remove whether or not proposed AfD. I'm going to propose deletion anyway - I'm not seeing enough notability despite a few news references. I'll not be suprised if I'm wrong - but I think the process
543:
I propose to amend the following sentences from the second paragraph of "Website background" which currently state: A second writ was issued concerning a Nintendo promotion that ran in 1993.. Shell settled both claims in October 1996. A third law suit was processed in 1999; however, the claimant
832:
If the stubbing includes removal of a lot of info I'd be against it. I would be interested in a proposed deletion as is, I think the validity of this page needs deciding (I can't form an opinion). It may well be that the page is kept, I think it would be a good idea to find out what the general
817:
The various mentions of the site in news organisations appear to confirm notability. However given the promotional activities of User:Johnadonovan I'm finding it difficult to form an objective view, and am tending to suspect that it's notability has been somewhat overblown by a single highly
536:
I propose some minor changes to the current article. I would like to amend the last sentence of the opening paragraph by adding the word "outlet" so that it says: The site has been oft quoted in news sources and is known for its activities as an internet leak outlet and a forum for Shell
813:
Yes, given the effort that has been put into this article to make it conform to wiki standards I'm finding it difficult to separate notable from non-notability. Do you intend to nominate for deletion - if so wouldn't it be better to leave the content in at the time of deletion
609:
Oleg Mitvol, the so-called "Kremlin attack dog", confirmed that he received insider evidence about the Sakhalin-II project from John Donovan of the website royaldutchshellplc.com. The Russian energy company Gazprom subsequently obtained a 50% stake in the Sakhalin-II project.
514:
Also, I have tried to organize your suggestions below but it's quite difficult. You can't just throw out a bunch of suggestions and expect an editor to read through it all. Please provide a list of bulleted items that editors can respond to individually, in the future.
602:
On October 18, 2006, the site published an article stating that Shell had for some time been supplying information to the Russian government relating to Sakhalin II. The Russian energy company Gazprom subsequently obtained a 50% stake in the Sakhalin-II project.
594:
I propose to correct the grammar in this sentence by deleting the word "are": It avoids being an illegal cybersquatter as long as it is non-commercial, active, and no attempt are made to sell the domain name, as determined by WIPO proceedings.
598:
The sentence below relating to Sakhalin-II contains incorrect information. I supplied the information to the Russian government, not Shell. I have not got a clue about the reference to an article published on October 18, 2006.:
774:
those three words, not adding a single extra word to the text. That seems to be a reasonable compromise bearing in mind as you have stated or implied, we seem to be the only two people interested in the editing of this article.
867:- it gets close - it has been the source used by a a number of press articles - just not sure that the coverage is about it more mentions than coverage - maybe a non for AfD, let the community decided, and if Keep then stub ? 249: 239: 153: 388: 659:
royaldutchshellplc.com is a Royal Dutch Shell gripe site operated by Alfred and John Donovan, who engaged in several marketing campaigns with Shell during the 1980s and early 1990s, ending with a
734:
what to do and since I have no intention of adding content myself here or on any other Knowledge (XXG) page, there seems little point in learning again just for this brief notice. Johnadonovan --
955: 259: 754:
have a special interest in articles relating to Shell. My background is open and declared. I have always added content in my own name. I would be grateful if an editor would consider {{
147: 980: 849:
Thus I'd prefer to nominate for discussion of potential deletion as is. user:Eustress seems to have been a major editor to this article, I will leave a message for them.
572:, senior correspondent of Petroleum Economist. This followed a long interview conducted at our home where he looked at many documents to verify our account of events. 653:
royaldutchshellplc.com is a Royal Dutch Shell gripe site operated by Alfred and John Donovan, who engaged in several marketing campaigns with Shell during the 1980s.
44: 79: 965: 960: 412: 950: 945: 378: 758:}} the proposed items 1, 2 and 3 above and either add the content or authorise me to do so installing verification links in the format already set. 85: 489:
No, you are not to take matters into your own hands if no one responds within some arbitrary time frame (four weeks, as you have determined). Per
190: 30: 919: 911: 468: 452: 407: 321: 168: 99: 498: 444: 354: 345: 316: 135: 104: 20: 74: 970: 291: 975: 65: 129: 225: 185: 125: 448: 109: 821:
One suggestion I would make is that information in this page would make (possibly one of the best) examples of a
739: 550:
Two further writs were issued, one concerning a Nintendo game and the other, a promotion called "Now Showing".
199: 710:
I will agree to add "and early 1990s", but I still feel the Star Trek bit is superfluous and self-promoting. —
297: 175: 735: 279: 779: 763: 701: 668: 636: 577: 462: 24: 915: 678:
The Star Trek info is superfluous and just self-promoting. The current text is accurate and sufficient. —
55: 755: 494: 337: 310: 70: 660: 616: 218: 141: 887: 868: 854: 838: 799: 161: 795: 882:
needs doing, and the article looking at from others who haven't been involved in previous issues.
872: 803: 621: 559: 551: 204: 775: 759: 697: 664: 632: 573: 555: 458: 51: 562:
article published in February 2007, Shell settled out of court "as part of a "peace treaty".
927: 918:
by Guardian establish the notability of Donovans and Shell relations. I also think that the
201: 864: 490: 613:
I will provide verification links to the agreed format confirming the cited information.
493:, you need to submit proposed edits for review on the article's talk page along with a {{ 353:
on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
907: 883: 850: 834: 939: 863:
Was thinking of the stub as a alternate to delete, as it is not clear with regard to
713: 681: 518: 504: 397: 931: 891: 876: 858: 842: 807: 783: 767: 743: 718: 705: 686: 672: 640: 581: 523: 509: 203: 922:
published by The Times and other sources is worth of mentioning in this article.
923: 650:
I missed some incorrect information in the first paragraph. It currently says:
826: 822: 626: 443:
to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
228:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: 350: 825:- I'd be tempted to suggest a merge of some of the information into 558:
announced that the claimant had abandoned the claim, according to a
617:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2006/oct/04/russia.oilandpetrol
349:, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major 565:
The verification links would be inserted in the proper fashion.
569: 622:
http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=8209
428: 273: 213: 205: 15: 396: 471:) / Donovan, John This user has contributed to the article. 833:
populus thinks. I'm willing to propose it for that reason.
798:, I am planning to turn this into a stub - any comments ? 794:
Given the COI of the major editor and in accordance with
497:}} tag to attract users to review the edit, or to file a 441:
contributor may be personally or professionally connected
160: 554:
A fourth law suit was processed in 1999. Although a
174: 956:Redirect-Class Websites articles of Low-importance 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 290:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s 568:The Prospect magazine article was written by 8: 920:story about Shell's employees' database leak 540:If preferable, "outlet" could be "source". 591:Proposed further corrections 23 June 2009: 627:http://www.shellnews.net/images/Mitvol.pdf 552:Shell settled both claims in October 1996. 305: 981:Articles edited by connected contributors 307: 277: 7: 363:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Websites 296:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 966:Low-importance Computing articles 961:Redirect-Class Computing articles 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 951:Low-importance Websites articles 946:Redirect-Class Websites articles 631:That ends proposed corrections. 432: 383:This redirect has been rated as 336: 309: 278: 217: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 224:This article was nominated for 892:18:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 877:16:43, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 859:16:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 843:16:27, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 808:15:54, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 439:The following Knowledge (XXG) 405:This redirect is supported by 1: 366:Template:WikiProject Websites 42:Put new text under old text. 932:10:19, 2 October 2010 (UTC) 829:as an illustrative example. 997: 663:themed promotion in 1991. 719:23:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 706:21:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 687:01:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 673:22:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 656:I propose the following: 641:12:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 582:08:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 524:02:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 510:02:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 404: 382: 343:This redirect is part of 331: 304: 248:, 30 September 2010, see 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 784:16:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 768:15:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 744:13:12, 14 May 2021 (UTC) 480:Editing by John Donovan 258:, 29 January 2007, see 971:All Computing articles 401: 75:avoid personal attacks 25:Royaldutchshellplc.com 976:All Websites articles 544:abandoned the claim. 501:if no one responds. — 453:neutral point of view 408:WikiProject Computing 400: 100:Neutral point of view 445:conflict of interest 346:WikiProject Websites 105:No original research 606:Proposed revision: 556:joint press release 499:request for comment 238:, 14 May 2021, see 914:by The Times, and 402: 292:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 818:dedicated editor. 736:Johnalfreddonovan 537:whistleblowers. 477: 476: 427: 426: 423: 422: 419: 418: 369:Websites articles 272: 271: 268: 267: 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 988: 436: 435: 429: 389:importance scale 371: 370: 367: 364: 361: 340: 333: 332: 327: 324: 313: 306: 283: 282: 274: 230: 229: 221: 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 996: 995: 991: 990: 989: 987: 986: 985: 936: 935: 904: 792: 751: 731: 648: 589: 534: 482: 433: 368: 365: 362: 359: 358: 325: 319: 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 994: 992: 984: 983: 978: 973: 968: 963: 958: 953: 948: 938: 937: 906:It seems that 903: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 846: 845: 830: 819: 815: 791: 788: 787: 786: 750: 747: 730: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 690: 689: 647: 644: 588: 585: 533: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 481: 478: 475: 474: 473: 472: 437: 425: 424: 421: 420: 417: 416: 413:Low-importance 403: 393: 392: 385:Low-importance 381: 375: 374: 372: 341: 329: 328: 326:Low‑importance 314: 302: 301: 295: 284: 270: 269: 266: 265: 264: 263: 253: 243: 222: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 993: 982: 979: 977: 974: 972: 969: 967: 964: 962: 959: 957: 954: 952: 949: 947: 944: 943: 941: 934: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 901: 893: 889: 885: 880: 879: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 861: 860: 856: 852: 848: 847: 844: 840: 836: 831: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 811: 810: 809: 805: 801: 797: 789: 785: 781: 777: 772: 771: 770: 769: 765: 761: 757: 748: 746: 745: 741: 737: 728: 720: 717: 716: 715: 709: 708: 707: 703: 699: 694: 693: 692: 691: 688: 685: 684: 683: 677: 676: 675: 674: 670: 666: 662: 657: 654: 651: 645: 643: 642: 638: 634: 629: 628: 624: 623: 619: 618: 614: 611: 607: 604: 600: 596: 592: 586: 584: 583: 579: 575: 571: 566: 563: 561: 557: 553: 548: 545: 541: 538: 531: 525: 522: 521: 520: 513: 512: 511: 508: 507: 506: 500: 496: 492: 488: 487: 486: 479: 470: 467: 464: 460: 457: 456: 454: 450: 449:autobiography 446: 442: 438: 431: 430: 414: 411:(assessed as 410: 409: 399: 395: 394: 390: 386: 380: 377: 376: 373: 356: 352: 348: 347: 342: 339: 335: 334: 330: 323: 318: 315: 312: 308: 303: 299: 293: 289: 285: 281: 276: 275: 261: 257: 254: 251: 247: 244: 241: 237: 234: 233: 232: 231: 227: 223: 220: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 910:by Reuters, 905: 793: 776:Johnadonovan 760:Johnadonovan 756:Request edit 752: 749:Request edit 732: 729:Request edit 712: 711: 698:Johnadonovan 680: 679: 665:Johnadonovan 658: 655: 652: 649: 633:Johnadonovan 630: 625: 620: 615: 612: 608: 605: 601: 597: 593: 590: 574:Johnadonovan 570:Derek Brower 567: 564: 549: 546: 542: 539: 535: 517: 516: 503: 502: 495:Request edit 483: 465: 459:Johnadonovan 440: 406: 384: 355:project page 344: 298:WikiProjects 287: 255: 246:no consensus 245: 235: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 547:Proposed: 148:free images 31:not a forum 940:Categories 908:this story 827:Gripe site 823:gripe site 260:discussion 250:discussion 240:discussion 884:Sf5xeplus 851:Sf5xeplus 835:Sf5xeplus 814:proposal? 796:WP:BEFORE 661:Star Trek 322:Computing 88:if needed 71:Be polite 27:redirect. 21:talk page 916:this one 912:this one 869:Codf1977 800:Codf1977 714:Eustress 682:Eustress 560:magazine 519:Eustress 505:Eustress 469:contribs 360:Websites 351:websites 317:Websites 288:redirect 226:deletion 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 902:Sources 387:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 924:Beagel 865:WP:WEB 790:Stub ? 491:WP:COI 451:, and 294:scale. 126:Google 286:This 236:Merge 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 928:talk 888:talk 873:talk 855:talk 839:talk 804:talk 780:talk 764:talk 740:talk 702:talk 669:talk 637:talk 578:talk 463:talk 256:keep 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 455:. 379:Low 176:TWL 942:: 930:) 890:) 875:) 857:) 841:) 806:) 782:) 766:) 742:) 704:) 671:) 639:) 580:) 447:, 415:). 320:: 156:) 54:; 926:( 886:( 871:( 853:( 837:( 802:( 778:( 762:( 738:( 700:( 667:( 646:3 635:( 587:2 576:( 532:1 515:— 466:· 461:( 391:. 357:. 300:: 262:. 252:. 242:. 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Royaldutchshellplc.com
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
Articles for deletion
deletion
discussion
discussion
discussion

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.