1108:
free being, are also free to ignore the warning! But repeated deliberate deletions based on persistent false statements, which are proven to be false, where such proof is ignored while repeating the action, cannot be dismissed as non-vandalism. Thank you for quoting, "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of
Knowledge (XXG)", because removal of proven-correct references directly compromises the integrity of Knowledge (XXG), by damaging its
468:
450:
245:
478:
173:
22:
617:". Moreover before accusing someone of vandalism just because you are in a bad mood, is useful to look to its edits. Than you would have noticed, that I'm here since 2006 and just today I made some 70 edits none of which has been reverted. Please, when you are tired, in a bad mood or whatever else, do not come to edit Knowledge (XXG) and waste contributors time. --
87:
1030:"Bold edits, though they may precede consensus or be inconsistent with prior consensus, are not vandalism unless other aspects of the edits identify them as vandalism. The Knowledge (XXG) community encourages users to be bold, and acknowledges the role of bold edits in reaching consensus." **"Edit warring is not vandalism and should not be dealt with as such."
77:
53:
830:" and you'd have apologised for accusing me of vandalism and removed the notice from my talkpage. If instead of spending your energy in harassing me as you did, had you looked for a better reference in the first place, the issue would have been resolved hours ago with less ado and waste of editors time.--
1107:
Why not just de-escalate? There is no harassment going on, neither has there been any threat, nor unjust accusation. Requestion 3O is not harassment. You are free to mock the
Twinkle generic language - and you are free to reject my specific explanation added to the Twinkle boilerplate. You, as a
876:
which part of VANDNOT are you specifically calling into play here? There's nothing which excuses repeated non-AGF deletions accompanied as they were by uncivil, insulting comments and false edit summaries. I don't expect you to agree with this. Do you want VANDNOT to be expanded to allow such
678:
your accusations just made (above) only make matters worse for you. The 1999 and 2004 editions of the books, with the same title and author, have differences. If you knew this (and you have not denied this), and deleted anyways: that's vandalism. Your tone and actions, then and now, are not in
1003:
After you managed to accuse me of "vandalism" some 5 or 6 times in few hours between here, your talk page, edit summaries and article talk page, you haven't managed to actually read and understand what vandalism is. Now here is the essence of that is considered vandalism on
Knowledge (XXG):
999:
The funny thing is, later on you write: "I could only assume it was vandalism, since you must have read the publication date correctly". Right. Because doubting that a smaller paperback edition has information not present in the larger hard-cover edition is a clear example of vandalism.
1201:
The reference in question seems to work fine for me from the west coast of the USA. I see no reason that it should be removed from the article. Using the discussion page when the Gbooks link did not work (rather than immediately hitting the undo button) might have been more
563:. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging
610:
I wonder if you read and think before taking any action. You accused my of vandalism because, in you opinion I removed content "without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary" and not happy about it, you advised to use the sand
636:
my given reference. My given reference was the 2004 edition, which discusses
Roomano, as seen at the given link. I could only assume it was vandalism, since you must have read the publication date correctly, and known the ref was valid.
143:
660:. Moreover, that the paperback edition from 2004 is a revisited edition of the hardcover from 1999 is just you supposition/hope (in order not to be utterly wrong and not just wrong as you are at the moment). --
394:
project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
182:
63:
408:
373:
232:
859:
LOL!!! You really need to learn to understand when you read! And I'd like to remind you, that you still need to apologise to me for the repeated unfounded accusation of vandalism. --
613:
Now, if you had tried to read just a little bit, you would have noticed that I DID put a explanation for my removal, and very valid too: it is wrong! And just for you here it is: "
793:, at first returned a Google "Maximum page views" message in place of the page preview. However, doing an in-book search for "Roomano" then produced the full preview page. This
1281:
137:
761:
560:
964:"Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Knowledge (XXG), as you did to Roomano, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary."
395:
402:
794:
567:. Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the
1296:
1291:
568:
113:
1276:
1306:
504:
1301:
771:
The first link, Perseus' page, shows the "Selling
Territory" to be US/Canada only. The above links might only be accessible via a U.S. proxy. --
255:
100:
58:
988:. Right. While doing some 70# constructive edits, I got bored and I thought to add "some blatant lie", just to upset you....LOL! In other words
1216:
User:Dia^ appears to have asked not to be contacted on their talk page again regarding this; it probably is best to comply with that request.
768:
1286:
800:
Even though 3O has been requested, we can still discuss, and perhaps even settle this before they show up (days, usually). So, discuss. --
500:
491:
455:
1120:
That is the most pro-Knowledge (XXG), pro-progress, pro-resolution statement any
Wikipedian can ever make, in the midst of a dispute. --
1039:
Short at to the point, you have accused me unjustly and repeatedly of vandalism and lying, threatened me and generally wasted my time.--
564:
549:
1249:
I appreciate the time taken, and I will refrain from inappropriate use of the specific word "vandalism" as (too) narrowly defined here.
1073:
Not really, since you accused accused me unjustly and repeatedly of vandalism and lying, threatened me and generally wasted my time.--
1198:
None of the recent edits to the article represent vandalism, which is defined as a deliberate attempt to damage
Knowledge (XXG).
33:
790:
736:
112:
related articles on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
891:
1012:. Clearly removing a reference because believed wrong and explaining that in the summary is no vandalism. (Here is the
384:
656:
So here my answer (identical to the one on my talk page): And that's hardly any vandalism. Just for you here what is
754:
680:
426:
576:
39:
21:
883:
pointedly says "The principle of verifiability implies nothing about ease of access to sources". That is,
1013:
993:
887:
inability to verify a given reference is not a good reason to delete a reference. Templates such as
1115:
823:
714:
692:
657:
615:(well, I just checked on Amazon and there "Roomano" is not mentioned at all in the given reference)
572:
691:, please. And please do not communicate with me further except respectfully, politely, or through
688:
380:
1143:
Stop harassing me! And don't pretend not to understand. You know you have not acted correctly. --
483:
1210:
1144:
1093:
1074:
1040:
860:
831:
661:
618:
278:
244:
713:
Third
Opinion - please stop edit warring, pending 3O. If you prefer, we can use a different
538:
1257:
1225:
1174:
1125:
1063:
1055:
996:, you should learn it by heart! And someone should test you every few days, just to be sure.
946:
920:
901:
850:
805:
776:
744:
722:
700:
642:
596:
587:
1206:
1169:
Speak for yourself. We'll see what 3O or any other dispute resolution says. No problem. --
1148:
1097:
1078:
1044:
936:
864:
835:
665:
622:
1191:
977:, removal of content". LOL!! I think you loose a bit too fast the sense of proportion...
710:
632:
You looked at the 1999 edition on Amazon, which has "Look Inside" but no
Roomano. That
467:
449:
955:
LOL!! Still problem with the understanding? No problem! I'm always happy to help! ;0)
337:
1243:
1239:
1235:
Thank you for responding to my request for 3O. Though I respectfully disagree with #1
1109:
1033:
last but not least: "However, not leaving edit summaries is not considered vandalism."
880:
1270:
556:
731:
Followup 2: For verification of the URL in the given ref, here are two screengrabs
303:
172:
739:, second, the search result for a key phrase in the article. Hope this helps. --
1253:
1221:
1170:
1121:
1059:
942:
916:
846:
801:
772:
740:
718:
696:
638:
592:
496:
363:
92:
473:
82:
969:
I did actually write the reason for it. The reference was not good or clear.
307:
828:
your edit summary as applied to the ref was false and therefore invalid,'
1252:
Could you now settle whether any alleged "harassing" has taken place? --
676:
your edit summary as applied to the ref was false and therefore invalid,
984:
Still thinking that was not enough, you accused me of a "blatant lie",
986:
something that you changed while I was answering you on your talk page
86:
786:
315:
495:, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the
379:
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
359:
341:
311:
295:
291:
287:
109:
1242:, their deletion damages WP, and individual inability to verify
653:
Nice to post an answer here and a different one on my talk page!
499:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, visit the
367:
333:
299:
283:
105:
76:
52:
1006:"Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a
1261:
1229:
1178:
1152:
1129:
1101:
1082:
1067:
1048:
950:
924:
868:
854:
839:
809:
780:
748:
726:
704:
669:
646:
626:
600:
580:
15:
171:
732:
826:, otherwise you would not write such work of fantasy as: "
753:
Followup 3: Running Press/Perseus' official book page for
1010:
attempt to compromise the integrity of Knowledge (XXG)"
985:
614:
222:
217:
212:
207:
1205:
Both the participants here should consider re-reading
909:
relevant to the article and reference, not the editor
822:
I guess you didn't bother to read what is written in
545:
This article talk page was automatically added with
503:
where you can join the project or contribute to the
104:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
911:, are all better approaches. I hope you agree with
154:
142:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1020:Even more specifically in written under "What is
403:Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested images of food
760:, Perseus' official branded preview at Google:
674:The ref is valid, your deletion was incorrect,
1116:dispute resolution process you care to engage
8:
958:Here it is: All you mistakes in this issue:
1282:Unknown-importance Food and drink articles
444:
195:
151:
122:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Food and drink
47:
19:
992:You should not just read and understand
990:you have accused ma wrongly a third time
513:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Netherlands
489:This article falls within the scope of
446:
49:
907:, and asking investigative questions
797:worked for me, your mileage may vary.
785:Followup 4: Proxify.com, one of many
7:
1112:. To repeat, I welcome a review by
735:. The first is a screengrab of the
695:resolution procedures. Thank you. --
687:an encyclopedia cooperatively. Read
98:This article is within the scope of
1297:WikiProject Food and drink articles
1292:Unknown-importance Cheeses articles
1190:I am responding to a request for a
401:Provide photographs and images for
252:Here are some tasks you can do for
125:Template:WikiProject Food and drink
38:It is of interest to the following
1277:Stub-Class Food and drink articles
14:
1307:All WikiProject Netherlands pages
979:Well, clearly you are wrong again
658:NOT vandalism on Knowledge (XXG)
516:Template:WikiProject Netherlands
476:
466:
448:
407:Consider joining this project's
243:
85:
75:
51:
20:
1302:Stub-Class Netherlands articles
973:In the edit summary you wrote "
429:from the project's tasks pages.
372:Participate in project-related
1262:11:18, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
1230:08:01, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
1179:17:42, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
1153:17:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
1130:16:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
1102:15:40, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
1083:15:35, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
1068:15:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
1049:15:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
971:So you are wrong a first time.
951:15:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
939:to maintain single discussion)
925:13:40, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
869:13:42, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
855:13:04, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
840:10:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
810:06:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
791:Google books page preview link
781:05:40, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
749:02:00, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
727:00:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
705:00:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
670:19:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
647:18:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
627:18:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
601:00:37, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
392:{{WikiProject Food and drink}}
1:
709:Followup: I have requested a
180:This article is supported by
116:and see a list of open tasks.
935:(moved Dia^'s response from
1287:Stub-Class Cheeses articles
1323:
1054:(moved this response from
550:WikiProject Food and drink
539:WikiProject Food and drink
256:WikiProject Food and drink
230:To edit this page, select
144:project's importance scale
101:WikiProject Food and drink
1244:does not justify deletion
845:I accept your apology. --
555:banner as it falls under
461:
199:Food and Drink task list:
194:
179:
150:
141:
70:
46:
733:http://imgur.com/a/RSQXF
717:resolution procedure. --
581:00:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
561:one of its subcategories
387:to learn how to do this.
683:of Knowledge (XXG): to
492:WikiProject Netherlands
128:Food and drink articles
881:WP:V#Access to sources
425:Note: These lists are
350:articles currently at
324:articles currently at
272:Status or below up to
183:the Cheeses task force
176:
28:This article is rated
789:, presented with the
409:Assessment task force
175:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
767:, in-book "Roomano"
679:accordance with the
519:Netherlands articles
374:deletion discussions
892:verification failed
268:articles currently
155:Related taskforces:
681:goals and precepts
484:Netherlands portal
385:WP:Handling trivia
279:Agaricus bisporus
177:
34:content assessment
1248:
606:Do you ever read?
586:(moved here from
569:project talk page
535:
534:
531:
530:
527:
526:
443:
442:
439:
438:
435:
434:
422:
421:
282:(i.e. mushroom),
264:Help bring these
190:
189:
1314:
1240:WP requires refs
1236:
1092:harassing me. --
1056:User talk:Lexein
906:
900:
896:
890:
787:free web proxies
763:Cheese Companion
756:Cheese Companion
588:User talk:Lexein
554:
548:
521:
520:
517:
514:
511:
486:
481:
480:
479:
470:
463:
462:
452:
445:
430:
247:
239:
238:
196:
162:
152:
130:
129:
126:
123:
120:
95:
90:
89:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1267:
1266:
904:
898:
894:
888:
769:search results.
608:
552:
546:
543:
518:
515:
512:
509:
508:
482:
477:
475:
431:
424:
418:
415:in this section
348:High Importance
248:
227:
160:
127:
124:
121:
118:
117:
91:
84:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1320:
1318:
1310:
1309:
1304:
1299:
1294:
1289:
1284:
1279:
1269:
1268:
1265:
1264:
1250:
1218:
1217:
1214:
1203:
1199:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1135:
1133:
1132:
1087:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1031:
1018:
1017:
1001:
997:
967:
966:
965:
960:You wrote me:
959:
937:User talk:Dia^
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
878:
821:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
798:
783:
751:
729:
707:
654:
612:
607:
604:
573:TinucherianBot
542:
536:
533:
532:
529:
528:
525:
524:
522:
488:
487:
471:
459:
458:
453:
441:
440:
437:
436:
433:
432:
423:
420:
419:
417:
416:
405:
399:
388:
377:
370:
344:
338:French cuisine
322:Top Importance
318:
266:Top Importance
261:
250:
249:
242:
237:
236:
226:
225:
220:
215:
210:
204:
201:
200:
192:
191:
188:
187:
178:
168:
167:
165:
163:
157:
156:
148:
147:
140:
134:
133:
131:
119:Food and drink
114:the discussion
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
59:Food and drink
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1319:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1293:
1290:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1280:
1278:
1275:
1274:
1272:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1245:
1241:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1215:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1193:
1192:third opinion
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1117:
1111:
1110:verifiability
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:vandalism":
1023:
1015:
1011:
1009:
1002:
998:
995:
991:
987:
983:
982:
981:
980:
976:
975:Page blanking
972:
963:
962:
961:
956:
953:
952:
948:
944:
940:
938:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
903:
893:
886:
882:
879:
875:
872:
871:
870:
866:
862:
858:
857:
856:
852:
848:
844:
843:
842:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
811:
807:
803:
799:
796:
792:
788:
784:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
764:
759:
757:
752:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
706:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
677:
673:
672:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
644:
640:
635:
631:
630:
629:
628:
624:
620:
616:
605:
603:
602:
598:
594:
590:
589:
583:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
557:Category:Food
551:
540:
537:
523:
506:
502:
498:
494:
493:
485:
474:
472:
469:
465:
464:
460:
457:
454:
451:
447:
428:
414:
413:project ideas
410:
406:
404:
400:
397:
393:
389:
386:
382:
378:
375:
371:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:status up to
353:
349:
345:
343:
339:
335:
331:
328:status up to
327:
323:
319:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
259:
258:
257:
251:
246:
241:
240:
235:
234:
229:
228:
224:
221:
219:
216:
214:
211:
209:
206:
205:
203:
202:
198:
197:
193:
185:
184:
174:
170:
169:
166:
164:
159:
158:
153:
149:
145:
139:
136:
135:
132:
115:
111:
107:
103:
102:
94:
88:
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1237:
1219:
1189:
1134:
1113:
1089:
1086:
1072:
1053:
1052:
1038:
1021:
1019:
1014:long version
1007:
1005:
989:
978:
974:
970:
968:
957:
954:
934:
933:
912:
908:
884:
873:
827:
820:
762:
755:
737:page preview
684:
675:
633:
609:
585:
584:
544:
501:project page
490:
412:
391:
355:
351:
347:
346:Bring these
329:
325:
321:
320:Bring these
304:Ham and eggs
277:
273:
269:
265:
254:
253:
231:
181:
99:
40:WikiProjects
1202:productive.
994:WP:BONAFIDE
510:Netherlands
497:Netherlands
456:Netherlands
427:transcluded
411:. List any
396:select here
364:Burger King
93:Food portal
1271:Categories
1246:of a ref),
1008:deliberate
885:individual
824:WP:VANDNOT
715:WP:DISPUTE
693:WP:DISPUTE
505:discussion
30:Stub-class
877:behavior?
874:Actually,
689:WP:TIGERS
381:WP:Trivia
308:Soy sauce
276:status:
1220:Thanks!
1211:WP:CIVIL
390:Add the
358:status:
332:status:
1088:Please
902:dubious
634:was not
541:Tagging
213:history
64:Cheeses
1254:Lexein
1222:VQuakr
1207:WP:AGF
1171:Lexein
1122:Lexein
1060:Lexein
943:Lexein
917:Lexein
847:Lexein
802:Lexein
773:Lexein
765:(2004)
758:(2004)
741:Lexein
719:Lexein
697:Lexein
639:Lexein
593:Lexein
316:Yogurt
36:scale.
1000:(°_°)
913:this.
711:WP:3O
685:build
360:Apple
342:Sugar
312:Sushi
296:Drink
292:Curry
288:Bread
223:purge
218:watch
110:drink
1258:talk
1226:talk
1209:and
1175:talk
1149:talk
1145:Dia^
1126:talk
1114:any
1098:talk
1094:Dia^
1090:STOP
1079:talk
1075:Dia^
1064:talk
1045:talk
1041:Dia^
947:talk
921:talk
897:and
865:talk
861:Dia^
851:talk
836:talk
832:Dia^
806:talk
795:link
777:talk
745:talk
723:talk
701:talk
666:talk
662:Dia^
643:talk
623:talk
619:Dia^
611:box.
597:talk
577:talk
565:here
383:and
368:Fish
334:Beer
300:Food
284:Beef
233:here
208:edit
108:and
106:food
1022:not
571:--
559:or
138:???
1273::
1260:)
1228:)
1194:.
1177:)
1151:)
1128:)
1100:)
1081:)
1066:)
1058:--
1047:)
1016:).
949:)
941:--
923:)
915:--
905:}}
899:{{
895:}}
889:{{
867:)
853:)
838:)
808:)
779:)
747:)
725:)
703:)
668:)
645:)
637:--
625:)
599:)
591:--
579:)
553:}}
547:{{
366:,
362:,
356:FA
352:GA
340:,
336:,
330:FA
326:GA
314:,
310:,
306:,
302:,
298:,
294:,
290:,
286:,
274:GA
260::
161:/
62::
1256:(
1238:(
1224:(
1213:.
1173:(
1147:(
1124:(
1118:.
1096:(
1077:(
1062:(
1043:(
945:(
919:(
863:(
849:(
834:(
804:(
775:(
743:(
721:(
699:(
664:(
641:(
621:(
595:(
575:(
507:.
398:.
376:.
270:B
186:.
146:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
