468:. Due to constant ethnic conflicts between and within nations, the eventual use of such a weapon is highly probable in the view of the authors" does not represent the content of the book: while the authors indicate that they could be technically feasible, they also explain why they are not very likely. Furthermore, this long sentence it is giving a very heavy weight to less than 7 pages section of the book (out of a total of 262 pages).
351:
76:
49:
341:
323:
292:
263:
21:
183:: Knowledge (XXG) users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users; to approach even difficult situations in a dignified fashion and with a constructive and collaborative outlook; and to avoid acting in a manner that brings the project into disrepute. Unseemly conduct, such as
163:. Accordingly, it is not the appropriate venue for advocacy or for advancing a specific point of view. While coverage of all significant points of view is a necessary part of balancing an article, striving to give exposure to minority viewpoints that are not significantly expressed in reliable secondary sources is not.
425:
on my user subpages that would be helpful for updating this article. The subpages on IQ and human intelligence are reasonably complete now, always to be updated more, and the subpages on race and human genetics will be updated a lot more over the next few months. Feel free to refer to those to edit
529:
Knowledge (XXG) has a whole set of recommendations about how to write articles about books in general, and, yes, it is generally useful for any article about a book to cite reviews of the book and to find sourced information about how the book has been received by readers. --
273:
31:
135:. In particular, analyses or conclusions not already published in reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy are not appropriate for inclusion in articles.
200:
246:
95:
445:
I see this article is but a stub, and I wonder if the article has sufficient sources available to meet the notability requirements for a stand-alone
Knowledge (XXG) article about a book. --
93:, along with other articles relating to the area of conflict (namely, the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed), is currently subject to
173:
are expected to contribute neutrally instead of following their own agenda and, in particular, should take care to avoid creating the impression that their
59:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, which is a contentious topic.
371:
245:
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the full
90:
563:
375:
145:
and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources. Primary sources are permitted if used carefully. All interpretive claims, analyses, or
558:
184:
303:
62:
56:
365:
328:
192:
539:
269:
27:
535:
450:
431:
514:
I wonder if mentioning reviews, or general reception of the book would help readers make better use of this book?
471:
I have replaced it with the shorter and more correct sentence "The authors then discuss "the horrific prospect of
177:
is non-neutral, which could strongly suggest that their editing is not compatible with the goals of this project.
309:
291:
196:
238:
531:
446:
427:
422:
519:
230:
188:
543:
523:
484:
454:
435:
480:
379:
262:
20:
383:
214:
210:
160:
142:
108:
472:
465:
234:
226:
222:
174:
170:
146:
125:) are not negotiable and cannot be overruled, even when apparent consensus to do so exists.
476:
249:. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first.
100:
described in a 2010 Arbitration
Committee case where the articulated principles included:
150:
121:
116:
218:
112:
552:
350:
48:
515:
356:
133:"facts, allegations, ideas, and stories not already published by reliable sources"
464:
The sentence "The authors then discuss a fourth, alternate option in the form of
149:
about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than to
346:
475:," which they view as technically feasible but not very likely to be used."--
340:
322:
370:. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can
285:
257:
70:
43:
15:
74:
153:
of the primary-source material by
Knowledge (XXG) editors.
441:
Is notability requirement for books met by this article?
417:
This article could be much improved with more sources.
225:); or to evade procedural restrictions such as the
131:: Knowledge (XXG) defines "original research" as
426:this article and articles on related topics. --
382:. To improve this article, please refer to the
213:. Tag-team editing – to thwart core policies (
141:: Knowledge (XXG) articles should be based on
8:
423:Source Lists to Share with Other Wikipedians
85:Arbitration Ruling on Race and Intelligence
378:. To use this banner, please refer to the
317:
289:
30:on 21 February 2013 (UTC). The result of
376:discuss matters related to book articles
494:
384:relevant guideline for the type of work
319:
237:over articles; or otherwise to prevent
209:: Tag teams work in unison to push a
143:reliable, published secondary sources
91:Race: The Reality of Human Difference
7:
362:This article is within the scope of
159:: Knowledge (XXG) strives towards a
308:It is of interest to the following
229:or to violate behavioural norms by
107:: Knowledge (XXG) articles must be
119:. Those founding principles (the
14:
392:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Books
349:
339:
321:
290:
261:
47:
19:
268:This article was nominated for
26:This article was nominated for
510:Include reactions to the book?
460:Ethnically targeted bioweapons
455:15:38, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
272:on 2006 June 2. The result of
1:
544:20:54, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
524:18:31, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
473:ethnically targeted weapons
436:16:11, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
241:prevailing – is prohibited.
96:active arbitration remedies
580:
564:WikiProject Books articles
395:Template:WikiProject Books
485:17:03, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
334:
316:
233:; or to attempt to exert
559:Stub-Class Book articles
211:particular point of view
193:assumptions of bad faith
201:disruptive point-making
171:Single purpose accounts
167:Single purpose accounts
298:This article is rated
139:Correct use of sources
79:
302:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
247:arbitration case page
215:neutral point of view
161:neutral point of view
115:and must not contain
78:
223:no original research
477:Jacques de Selliers
65:and edit carefully.
61:Please consult the
304:content assessment
175:focus on one topic
80:
57:contentious topics
466:ethnic bioweapons
414:
413:
410:
409:
406:
405:
366:WikiProject Books
284:
283:
256:
255:
227:three revert rule
151:original analysis
129:Original research
117:original research
69:
68:
42:
41:
571:
532:WeijiBaikeBianji
502:
499:
447:WeijiBaikeBianji
428:WeijiBaikeBianji
400:
399:
396:
393:
390:
372:join the project
359:
354:
353:
343:
336:
335:
325:
318:
301:
295:
294:
286:
265:
258:
207:Tag-team editing
203:, is prohibited.
185:personal attacks
147:synthetic claims
77:
71:
51:
44:
23:
16:
579:
578:
574:
573:
572:
570:
569:
568:
549:
548:
512:
507:
506:
505:
500:
496:
462:
443:
419:
397:
394:
391:
388:
387:
355:
348:
299:
252:
251:
86:
75:
12:
11:
5:
577:
575:
567:
566:
561:
551:
550:
547:
546:
511:
508:
504:
503:
493:
492:
488:
461:
458:
442:
439:
418:
415:
412:
411:
408:
407:
404:
403:
401:
361:
360:
344:
332:
331:
326:
314:
313:
307:
296:
282:
281:
274:the discussion
266:
254:
253:
243:
242:
204:
178:
164:
154:
136:
126:
87:
84:
83:
81:
67:
66:
52:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
576:
565:
562:
560:
557:
556:
554:
545:
541:
537:
533:
528:
527:
526:
525:
521:
517:
509:
498:
495:
491:
487:
486:
482:
478:
474:
469:
467:
459:
457:
456:
452:
448:
440:
438:
437:
433:
429:
424:
416:
402:
398:Book articles
385:
381:
380:documentation
377:
373:
369:
368:
367:
358:
352:
347:
345:
342:
338:
337:
333:
330:
327:
324:
320:
315:
311:
305:
297:
293:
288:
287:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
260:
259:
250:
248:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
219:verifiability
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
144:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
124:
123:
118:
114:
110:
106:
103:
102:
101:
99:
97:
92:
82:
73:
72:
64:
60:
58:
53:
50:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
513:
497:
489:
470:
463:
444:
421:I have some
420:
364:
363:
357:Books portal
310:WikiProjects
277:
244:
231:edit warring
206:
180:
166:
156:
138:
132:
128:
120:
104:
94:
89:The article
88:
54:
35:
553:Categories
540:how I edit
490:References
300:Stub-class
197:harassment
189:incivility
113:verifiable
63:procedures
239:consensus
235:ownership
501:Page 248
270:deletion
157:Advocacy
28:deletion
516:Beaulen
181:Decorum
122:Pillars
109:neutral
105:Pillars
306:scale.
221:, and
389:Books
329:Books
199:, or
536:talk
520:talk
481:talk
451:talk
432:talk
374:and
278:keep
276:was
55:The
36:keep
34:was
555::
542:)
538:,
522:)
483:)
453:)
434:)
217:,
195:,
191:,
187:,
169::
111:,
534:(
518:(
479:(
449:(
430:(
386:.
312::
280:.
98:,
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
