1203:"Science and religion are based on different aspects of human experience. In science, explanations must be based on evidence drawn from examining the natural world. Scientifically based observations or experiments that conflict with an explanation eventually must lead to modification or even abandonment of that explanation. Religious faith, in contrast, does not depend only on empirical evidence, is not necessarily modified in the face of conflicting evidence, and typically involves supernatural forces or entities. Because they are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways. Attempts to pit science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist. (NASIM 2008: 12)", explained below
1209:"Following up on Pinker, it should be noted that it would not be scientifically acceptable today to appeal to miracles or to direct acts of God. Any supposed miracle would (to many, if not all scientists) be a kind of defeat and to welcome an unacceptable mystery. This is why some philosophers of science propose that the sciences are methodologically atheistic. That is, while science itself does not pass judgment on whether God exists (even though some philosophers of science do), appealing to God’s existence forms no part of their scientific theories and investigations."
1327:"The phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Knowledge (XXG) to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist. This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article and directly support the material being presented."
272:
755:
839:
519:
498:
1180:
overlapping. Can you provide some quotes from the sources on some of the statements made? This may have a spot in the article, but would be better as you said between
History and Perspectives since that is where these epistemic ideas make sense. The general structure of Incompatibility, Independence, Dialogue, Integration are the major sections of this article and those should be left alone since they are based on divisions made by historians of science.
470:
454:
438:
745:
724:
860:
529:
624:
634:
603:
988:
232:
263:
964:
944:
340:
305:
1000:
350:
1478:. "In conclusion, it appears that religious Americans have less positive attitudes toward, and less interest in, science. However, this does not appear to be a feature of religiosity, per se, as the effect is not clearly generalizable outside of the United States." You have to be careful with correlational studies.
1449:. "In conclusion, it appears that religious Americans have less positive attitudes toward, and less interest in, science. However, this does not appear to be a feature of religiosity, per se, as the effect is not clearly generalizable outside of the United States." You have to be careful with correlational studies.
1067:
In science, challenges to beliefs are often seen as opportunities to learn and improve understanding. Scientists are trained to question and scrutinize their own ideas as well as those of others, and recognize that challenges and criticism are an essential part of the scientific process. The attitude
1474:
Also bing is not a reliable source for anything. Just like google is not an appropriate refence for wikipedia. And the last reference you mentioned is a correlational study on religious
Americans, not moderate or liberal Americans. Here is another source by the same researchers showing that there is
1445:
Also bing is not a reliable source for anything. Just like google is not an appropriate refence for wikipedia. And the last reference you mentioned is a correlational study on religious
Americans, not moderate or liberal Americans. Here is another source by the same researchers showing that there is
1363:* I feel that the paragraph is supported by the sources, since the paragraph is objective summary from sources which satifies "you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article and directly support the material being presented." in my opinion.
1402:
Religiosity predicts negative attitudes towards science and lower levels of science literacy: "Finally, we also tested whether the predicted negative relation between religiosity and science knowledge is mediated by attitudes towards science. The rationale for such mediation is straightforward. To
1652:
Religiosity predicts negative attitudes towards science and lower levels of science literacy: "Finally, we also tested whether the predicted negative relation between religiosity and science knowledge is mediated by attitudes towards science. The rationale for such mediation is straightforward. To
1596:
Just making note that User:Gluo88 seems to ask algorithms or AI like bing for automated responses. It does not feel like I am talking to an actual human being since the responses seem automated, repetitive, and ignore context like failure to provide direct quotes for any of their proposed wording.
1246:
Thanks for providing some quotes. I read that source too. But they don't really say what you wrote in your proposed section about attitudes. They just say that religion and science are separate and don't overlap - they answer separate questions and there is no controversy. These do not support the
1071:
In religion, challenges to beliefs can be seen as threats to one's faith and personal identity. For some, questioning or challenging religious beliefs can be seen as disrespectful or even sacrilegious. However, for others, challenges to religious beliefs can be an opportunity for growth and deeper
1698:
While I like the general idea behind their edits, it is too black and white formulated: scientists can be very rigid and dogmatic (there is a difference between being open to hold debates and being prepared to be persuaded by evidence), it is just that the scientific community as a whole does not
1718:
The abave is regarding scientific attitude and religious attitude, not attitude of the dogmatic scientists or rational and open-minded theologians (as mentioned in the above text:"However, for others, challenges to religious beliefs can be an opportunity for growth and deeper understanding of
1076:
Overall, the attitude towards challenges faced by beliefs in science and faith in religion can be shaped by a range of factors, including cultural and personal beliefs, experiences, and worldviews. However, in general, the scientific attitude tends to prioritize evidence and inquiry, while the
1617:
The paragraph you wrote is mostly correct, but it could be improved by acknowledging that there are different views and perspectives within both science and religion, and that the relationship between them is not always one of conflict or harmony. For example, some religious people may accept
1503:
You may verify the quote in the source: "Finally, we also tested whether the predicted negative relation between religiosity and science knowledge is mediated by attitudes towards science. The rationale for such mediation is straightforward. To the extent that religious people view science as
1293:
The paragraph you wrote is mostly correct, but it could be improved by acknowledging that there are different views and perspectives within both science and religion, and that the relationship between them is not always one of conflict or harmony. For example, some religious people may accept
1463:
This is not a debate on the topic. The responsibility falls on you provide a source that directly says what you are proposing because you are one trying to add something to the article. Is there any source for example for your statement "However, in general, the scientific attitude tends to
1434:
This is not a debate on the topic. The responsibility falls on you provide a source that directly says what you are proposing because you are one trying to add something to the article. Is there any source for example for your statement "However, in general, the scientific attitude tends to
1179:
with the dichotomizing here. For instance, the "Epistemology" article you cite does not even mention religion or faith or science. The source on "Philosophy of
Religion" has a section on Religion and Science and it says that the sciences are methodologically agnostic and says they are not
1464:
prioritize evidence and inquiry, while the religious attitude often places greater emphasis on faith and personal experience."? A direct quote from any one of the 4 sources you cited making that specific claim on attitude? If no source makes that specific claim, then it is
1435:
prioritize evidence and inquiry, while the religious attitude often places greater emphasis on faith and personal experience."? A direct quote from any one of the 4 sources you cited making that specific claim on attitude? If no source makes that specific claim, then it is
1331:
The last sentence is important. Otherwise, what is to stop another editor from changing your wording for "their" interpretation of the same sources. If a source makes an explicit claim, everyone is locked in by what that source says and no need to interpret a source. See
1572:"It is commonly claimed that science and religion are logically and psychologically at odds with one another. However, previous studies have mainly examined American samples; therefore, generalizations about antagonism between religion and science may be unwarranted."
1576:"Therefore, by taking such a broad approach, we are confident that we have accurately assessed both science interest and attitudes adequately...In conclusion, it appears that religious Americans have less positive attitudes toward, and less interest in, science.
1320:
Hi again. It is not about your proposed wording being right or wrong. It is about the sources not supporting your proposed wording on
Knowledge (XXG). The sources you use should explicitly state the points you are writing about. This is to avoid violating
166:
1766:
786:
1283:
Microsoft New Bing: What are the differences of the attitudes towards challenges faced by beliefs in science and faith in religion, in area of psychology and attitudes? Are the following paragraph correct?
1052:
I feel that the attitude towards challenges faced by beliefs in science and faith in religion may be one of key topic for this entry, and it is better highlighted in someway, in a high level visible section.
57:
1756:
1554:
Gosh this whole thing is a mess. Ok since you clearly are not listening or following to wikipedia policy on original research, this whole section with all of the violations of wikipedia policy on
160:
1020:
276:
1771:
1618:
scientific challenges to their beliefs as a way of testing or strengthening their faith1, while some scientists may have religious beliefs that do not interfere with their scientific work2.
1294:
scientific challenges to their beliefs as a way of testing or strengthening their faith1, while some scientists may have religious beliefs that do not interfere with their scientific work2.
973:
in 2014 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education
Program:Duquesne University/UCOR 143 Global and Cultural Perspectives (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
953:
in 2014 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education
Program:DuquesneUniveristy/UCOR 143 Global and Cultural Perspectives (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
1821:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
1806:
1621:
You could also add some examples of specific challenges faced by beliefs in science and faith in religion, such as evolution, creationism, climate change, stem cell research, etc.345
1297:
You could also add some examples of specific challenges faced by beliefs in science and faith in religion, such as evolution, creationism, climate change, stem cell research, etc.345
821:
1861:
811:
1826:
371:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
1811:
223:
1403:
the extent that religious people view science as invalid, irrelevant, or morally suspect, they will be less interested in learning science, both formally and informally."
1653:
the extent that religious people view science as invalid, irrelevant, or morally suspect, they will be less interested in learning science, both formally and informally.
1219:
Ramos1990: "This may have a spot in the article, but would be better as you said between
History and Perspectives since that is where these epistemic ideas make sense.",
1008:
1866:
1816:
781:
1801:
1160:
I feel that
Espitemologocal Analysis of relationship between science and religion should be a section in this entry, between "history" and Perspectives sections. --
922:
408:
92:
1876:
1856:
1781:
912:
398:
1751:
706:
660:
477:
323:
777:
768:
729:
585:
461:
319:
445:
315:
181:
1846:
1836:
696:
575:
148:
37:
1119:
Bishop, John and Daniel J. McKaughan, "Faith", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.)
1881:
1791:
888:
373:
98:
1761:
668:
1851:
1578:
However, this does not appear to be a feature of religiosity, per se, as the effect is not clearly generalizable outside of the United States.
1492:"Also bing is not a reliable source for anything. " is not the topic that faces us, since the source is not bing, found by bing. The source is
1658:
but at that point you ingored my source and assume that the source context is from Ping, although I did not see the paper that you found.
1500:
title: "Religiosity predicts negative attitudes towards science and lower levels of science literacy, which will be addded to the paragraph."
1175:
This seems quite abstract and am not seeing stuff about attitude in the sources you cited the way it is presented above. Seems like a lot of
551:
1871:
1776:
142:
43:
1370:: If your viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with references to commonly accepted reference texts;)
1796:
1130:"Religiosity predicts negative attitudes towards science and lower levels of science literacy, which will be addded to the paragraph.""
867:
844:
664:
363:
310:
1841:
1024:
138:
1360:* I have responded "Thank you for your feedback. I guess that we may have different conclusion based on our different interpretions."
112:
1831:
1101:
Hansson, Sven Ove, "Science and Pseudo-Science", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
1092:
Taliaferro, Charles, "Philosophy of Religion", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
1063:"Attitude towards challenges" The attitude towards challenges faced by beliefs in science and faith in religion can vary greatly.
672:
648:
608:
117:
33:
1786:
188:
1110:
Steup, Matthias and Ram Neta, "Epistemology", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
970:
950:
542:
503:
87:
1746:
285:
1475:
no consistent correlation between religion and attitudes towards science when looking at 60 countries instead of just the US
1446:
no consistent correlation between religion and attitudes towards science when looking at 60 countries instead of just the US
776:
content on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
78:
1206:" Despite the initial plausibility of the Academies stance, however, it may be problematic. First, ..." ....
1504:
invalid, irrelevant, or morally suspect, they will be less interested in learning science, both formally and informally."
1058:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Relationship_between_religion_and_science&diff=1142949541&oldid=1142949185
887:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
154:
773:
231:
198:
1269:
Thank you for your feedback. I guess that we may have different conclusion based on our different interpretions.
122:
1567:
1476:
1447:
760:
242:
291:
1646:
1495:
1399:
1129:
1731:
1712:
1667:
1638:
1606:
1591:
1534:
1487:
1458:
1416:
1379:
1345:
1315:
1278:
1264:
1241:
1189:
1169:
1150:
1042:
1028:
68:
1038:
550:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1699:
cherish monolithic ideological unity, and many theologians are very rational and open-minded (see e.g.
1247:
dichotomizing nor do they say anything on attitudes or challenges from science or religion. Looks like
83:
1306:
1. pewresearch.org2. plato.stanford.edu3. pewresearch.org4. journals.plos.org5. nationalacademies.org
1708:
1700:
246:
1468:. The philosophy of religion source you cite does not make such a statement any where in the source.
1439:. The philosophy of religion source you cite does not make such a statement any where in the source.
262:
1602:
1587:
1483:
1454:
1341:
1260:
1185:
174:
1723:
1659:
1630:
1526:
1408:
1371:
1307:
1270:
1233:
1161:
1142:
991:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
982:
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - RPM SP 2022 - MASY1-GC 1260 200 Thu
247:
1355:
Ramos1990: " It is about the sources not supporting your proposed wording on Knowledge (XXG).",
1068:
towards challenges in science is often one of curiosity and openness to new ideas and evidence.
355:
64:
1727:
1663:
1634:
1530:
1412:
1375:
1311:
1274:
1237:
1165:
1146:
859:
838:
244:
1559:
1471:
You cannot just take sources and make an essay out of them. Please follow wikipedia policy.
1442:
You cannot just take sources and make an essay out of them. Please follow wikipedia policy.
1333:
1248:
1176:
1704:
639:
1555:
1465:
1436:
1322:
1252:
518:
497:
1598:
1583:
1479:
1450:
1337:
1256:
1181:
1004:
534:
1367:
744:
723:
469:
453:
437:
1740:
1034:
880:
876:
1077:
religious attitude often places greater emphasis on faith and personal experience.
1597:
The responses seem choppy and incoherent too. Never seen anything like this before.
528:
1216:"Epistemology" entry is for the reason that philosophy and science follows this.
987:
633:
1568:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1948550620923239?journalCode=sppa
1507:
The new reference has been added to the paragraph, which has 5 references now.
884:
750:
629:
524:
368:
345:
1368:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Neutral_point_of_view
963:
943:
623:
602:
1019:
this chapter seems to be missing several world religions, such as Judaism.
659:-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us
1647:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207125
1496:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207125
1400:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207125
655:
872:
547:
367:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
1629:
Note: I am not sure how you can assume my other response is from AI?
1366:* The above from bing is to get more opinions on the paragraph (See
339:
304:
1767:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
1643:
At one point, I manualy checked source link, provided the source
958:
938:
256:
248:
28:
15:
468:
452:
436:
1156:
propose to add section with title Espitemologocal Analysis
780:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1757:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Philosophy and religion
1719:
their faith"). Thank you very much for offering opinion.
1614:"Hello, this is Bing. I can help you with your question.
1290:
Hello, this is Bing. I can help you with your question.
1057:
1300:
I hope this helps. Do you have any other questions? 😊
173:
653:, a project to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s articles on
1624:
I hope this helps. Do you have any other questions?"
1611:
I have identified the only portion from AI already:
871:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
546:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
419:
187:
1772:B-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
1562:does not belong in the article at all. Also, the
1582:Not sure why you are ignoring the updated paper.
46:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1822:High-importance philosophy of religion articles
1807:High-importance philosophy of science articles
796:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject History of Science
787:History of Science Collaboration of the Month
8:
1398:from Bing for support the above paragraph:
377:about philosophy content on Knowledge (XXG).
1862:High-importance history of science articles
1827:Philosophy of religion task force articles
833:
718:
597:
492:
416:
299:
1812:Philosophy of science task force articles
772:, an attempt to improve and organize the
38:Relationship between religion and science
1867:WikiProject History of Science articles
1817:B-Class philosophy of religion articles
1085:
835:
799:Template:WikiProject History of Science
720:
599:
494:
301:
260:
1802:B-Class philosophy of science articles
1752:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
1021:2601:5C1:4401:1EB0:A956:86BC:43DD:EDC7
897:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Skepticism
383:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Philosophy
7:
1048:Propose to add the following section
865:This article is within the scope of
681:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Religion
645:This article is within the scope of
540:This article is within the scope of
361:This article is within the scope of
1877:High-importance Skepticism articles
1857:B-Class history of science articles
1782:High-importance Philosophy articles
969:This article was the subject of an
949:This article was the subject of an
560:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Science
290:It is of interest to the following
36:for discussing improvements to the
1226:yes, I agree. Thank you very much.
996:
992:
14:
1033:gah i got logged out, apologies!
63:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1847:Top-importance Religion articles
1837:High-importance science articles
999:. Further details are available
986:
962:
942:
858:
837:
753:
743:
722:
632:
622:
601:
527:
517:
496:
348:
338:
303:
270:
261:
230:
58:Click here to start a new topic.
1882:WikiProject Skepticism articles
1792:High-importance ethics articles
917:This article has been rated as
900:Template:WikiProject Skepticism
816:This article has been rated as
701:This article has been rated as
580:This article has been rated as
403:This article has been rated as
386:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
1762:B-Class level-5 vital articles
1566:reference by your researchers
1015:re: specific religions chapter
784:. You can also help with the
769:History of Science WikiProject
1:
1852:WikiProject Religion articles
1072:understanding of their faith.
891:and see a list of open tasks.
684:Template:WikiProject Religion
554:and see a list of open tasks.
55:Put new text under old text.
1352:Thank you for your feedback.
1043:14:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
1029:14:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
766:This article is part of the
563:Template:WikiProject Science
1872:B-Class Skepticism articles
1777:B-Class Philosophy articles
802:history of science articles
1898:
1797:Ethics task force articles
923:project's importance scale
822:project's importance scale
707:project's importance scale
586:project's importance scale
409:project's importance scale
1842:B-Class Religion articles
1732:14:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1713:07:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1668:02:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
1639:02:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
1607:22:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1592:22:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1535:21:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1488:20:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1459:20:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1417:19:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1380:19:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1346:18:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1316:17:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1279:17:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1265:16:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1242:13:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1196:"Philosophy of Religion":
1190:05:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1170:04:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
1151:04:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
916:
853:
815:
761:History of science portal
738:
700:
617:
579:
512:
476:
460:
444:
415:
402:
333:
298:
93:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
1832:B-Class science articles
671:standards, or visit the
21:
1787:B-Class ethics articles
420:Associated task forces:
1747:B-Class vital articles
971:educational assignment
951:educational assignment
868:WikiProject Skepticism
478:Philosophy of religion
473:
457:
441:
364:WikiProject Philosophy
88:avoid personal attacks
1003:. Student editor(s):
472:
462:Philosophy of science
456:
440:
284:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
277:level-5 vital article
224:Auto-archiving period
113:Neutral point of view
1701:Liberal Christianity
649:WikiProject Religion
118:No original research
903:Skepticism articles
543:WikiProject Science
389:Philosophy articles
1694:Edit warring by IP
1001:on the course page
793:History of Science
774:history of science
730:History of Science
661:assess and improve
474:
458:
442:
374:general discussion
286:content assessment
99:dispute resolution
60:
1060:section deleted]
977:
976:
957:
956:
937:
936:
933:
932:
929:
928:
832:
831:
828:
827:
717:
716:
713:
712:
687:Religion articles
675:for more details.
596:
595:
592:
591:
491:
490:
487:
486:
483:
482:
356:Philosophy portal
255:
254:
79:Assume good faith
56:
27:
26:
1889:
1134:
1133:
1126:
1120:
1117:
1111:
1108:
1102:
1099:
1093:
1090:
1009:article contribs
998:
994:
993:27 February 2022
990:
966:
959:
946:
939:
905:
904:
901:
898:
895:
862:
855:
854:
849:
841:
834:
804:
803:
800:
797:
794:
763:
758:
757:
756:
747:
740:
739:
734:
726:
719:
689:
688:
685:
682:
679:
673:wikiproject page
642:
637:
636:
626:
619:
618:
613:
605:
598:
568:
567:
566:science articles
564:
561:
558:
537:
532:
531:
521:
514:
513:
508:
500:
493:
427:
417:
391:
390:
387:
384:
381:
358:
353:
352:
351:
342:
335:
334:
329:
326:
307:
300:
283:
274:
273:
266:
265:
257:
249:
235:
234:
225:
192:
191:
177:
108:Article policies
29:
16:
1897:
1896:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1737:
1736:
1696:
1158:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1128:
1127:
1123:
1118:
1114:
1109:
1105:
1100:
1096:
1091:
1087:
1050:
1017:
984:
919:High-importance
902:
899:
896:
893:
892:
848:High‑importance
847:
818:High-importance
801:
798:
795:
792:
791:
759:
754:
752:
733:High‑importance
732:
686:
683:
680:
677:
676:
640:Religion portal
638:
631:
611:
582:High-importance
565:
562:
559:
556:
555:
533:
526:
507:High‑importance
506:
425:
405:High-importance
388:
385:
382:
379:
378:
354:
349:
347:
328:High‑importance
327:
313:
281:
271:
251:
250:
245:
222:
134:
129:
128:
127:
104:
74:
12:
11:
5:
1895:
1893:
1885:
1884:
1879:
1874:
1869:
1864:
1859:
1854:
1849:
1844:
1839:
1834:
1829:
1824:
1819:
1814:
1809:
1804:
1799:
1794:
1789:
1784:
1779:
1774:
1769:
1764:
1759:
1754:
1749:
1739:
1738:
1735:
1734:
1720:
1695:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1644:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1615:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1505:
1501:
1498:
1493:
1472:
1469:
1461:
1443:
1440:
1405:
1404:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1364:
1361:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1353:
1329:
1304:
1301:
1298:
1295:
1291:
1288:
1285:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1221:
1220:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1207:
1204:
1198:
1197:
1157:
1154:
1136:
1135:
1121:
1112:
1103:
1094:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1049:
1046:
1016:
1013:
983:
980:
975:
974:
967:
955:
954:
947:
935:
934:
931:
930:
927:
926:
915:
909:
908:
906:
889:the discussion
863:
851:
850:
842:
830:
829:
826:
825:
814:
808:
807:
805:
765:
764:
748:
736:
735:
727:
715:
714:
711:
710:
703:Top-importance
699:
693:
692:
690:
644:
643:
627:
615:
614:
612:Top‑importance
606:
594:
593:
590:
589:
578:
572:
571:
569:
552:the discussion
539:
538:
535:Science portal
522:
510:
509:
501:
489:
488:
485:
484:
481:
480:
475:
465:
464:
459:
449:
448:
443:
433:
432:
430:
428:
422:
421:
413:
412:
401:
395:
394:
392:
360:
359:
343:
331:
330:
308:
296:
295:
289:
267:
253:
252:
243:
241:
240:
237:
236:
194:
193:
131:
130:
126:
125:
120:
115:
106:
105:
103:
102:
95:
90:
81:
75:
73:
72:
61:
52:
51:
48:
47:
41:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1894:
1883:
1880:
1878:
1875:
1873:
1870:
1868:
1865:
1863:
1860:
1858:
1855:
1853:
1850:
1848:
1845:
1843:
1840:
1838:
1835:
1833:
1830:
1828:
1825:
1823:
1820:
1818:
1815:
1813:
1810:
1808:
1805:
1803:
1800:
1798:
1795:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1785:
1783:
1780:
1778:
1775:
1773:
1770:
1768:
1765:
1763:
1760:
1758:
1755:
1753:
1750:
1748:
1745:
1744:
1742:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1693:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1651:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1623:
1620:
1616:
1613:
1612:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1579:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1506:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1470:
1467:
1462:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1441:
1438:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1401:
1397:
1396:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1362:
1359:
1354:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1336:for examples.
1335:
1330:
1328:
1324:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1302:
1299:
1296:
1292:
1289:
1286:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1232:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1215:
1214:
1208:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1178:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1155:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1131:
1125:
1122:
1116:
1113:
1107:
1104:
1098:
1095:
1089:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1054:
1047:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1014:
1012:
1010:
1006:
1002:
989:
981:
979:
972:
968:
965:
961:
960:
952:
948:
945:
941:
940:
924:
920:
914:
911:
910:
907:
890:
886:
882:
881:pseudohistory
878:
877:pseudoscience
874:
870:
869:
864:
861:
857:
856:
852:
846:
843:
840:
836:
823:
819:
813:
810:
809:
806:
789:
788:
783:
779:
775:
771:
770:
762:
751:
749:
746:
742:
741:
737:
731:
728:
725:
721:
708:
704:
698:
695:
694:
691:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
657:
652:
651:
650:
641:
635:
630:
628:
625:
621:
620:
616:
610:
607:
604:
600:
587:
583:
577:
574:
573:
570:
553:
549:
545:
544:
536:
530:
525:
523:
520:
516:
515:
511:
505:
502:
499:
495:
479:
471:
467:
466:
463:
455:
451:
450:
447:
439:
435:
434:
431:
429:
424:
423:
418:
414:
410:
406:
400:
397:
396:
393:
376:
375:
370:
366:
365:
357:
346:
344:
341:
337:
336:
332:
325:
321:
317:
312:
309:
306:
302:
297:
293:
287:
279:
278:
268:
264:
259:
258:
239:
238:
233:
229:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
195:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
133:
132:
124:
123:Verifiability
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
100:
96:
94:
91:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
70:
66:
65:Learn to edit
62:
59:
54:
53:
50:
49:
45:
39:
35:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
1697:
1577:
1575:
1571:
1563:
1524:
1406:
1326:
1159:
1140:
1124:
1115:
1106:
1097:
1088:
1080:
1075:
1062:
1055:
1051:
1032:
1018:
985:
978:
918:
866:
817:
785:
778:project page
767:
702:
663:articles to
654:
647:
646:
581:
541:
404:
372:
362:
292:WikiProjects
275:
227:
197:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
107:
32:This is the
1303:Learn more:
161:free images
44:not a forum
1741:Categories
1705:tgeorgescu
1081:References
997:5 May 2022
894:Skepticism
885:skepticism
845:Skepticism
782:discussion
380:Philosophy
369:philosophy
311:Philosophy
1599:Ramos1990
1584:Ramos1990
1574:and also
1480:Ramos1990
1451:Ramos1990
1338:Ramos1990
1257:Ramos1990
1182:Ramos1990
1005:Aashima99
280:is rated
101:if needed
84:Be polite
34:talk page
1035:Nortsapa
678:Religion
656:Religion
609:Religion
324:Religion
228:180 days
199:Archives
69:get help
42:This is
40:article.
1564:updated
1287:Answer:
921:on the
873:science
820:on the
705:on the
584:on the
557:Science
548:Science
504:Science
407:on the
320:Science
282:B-class
167:WP refs
155:scholar
1724:Gluo88
1660:Gluo88
1631:Gluo88
1560:WP:SYN
1527:Gluo88
1409:Gluo88
1372:Gluo88
1334:WP:SYN
1308:Gluo88
1271:Gluo88
1249:WP:SYN
1234:Gluo88
1177:WP:SYN
1162:Gluo88
1143:Gluo88
446:Ethics
316:Ethics
288:scale.
139:Google
1570:says
1556:WP:OR
1466:WP:OR
1437:WP:OR
1323:WP:OR
1253:WP:OR
269:This
182:JSTOR
143:books
97:Seek
1728:talk
1709:talk
1664:talk
1635:talk
1603:talk
1588:talk
1558:and
1531:talk
1484:talk
1455:talk
1413:talk
1376:talk
1342:talk
1312:talk
1275:talk
1261:talk
1251:and
1238:talk
1186:talk
1166:talk
1147:talk
1039:talk
1025:talk
995:and
913:High
883:and
812:High
667:and
665:good
576:High
399:High
175:FENS
149:news
86:and
1711:)
1703:).
1011:).
697:Top
669:1.0
189:TWL
1743::
1730:)
1722:--
1666:)
1649:,
1637:)
1605:)
1590:)
1533:)
1525:--
1486:)
1457:)
1415:)
1407:--
1378:)
1344:)
1325:-
1314:)
1277:)
1263:)
1240:)
1188:)
1168:)
1149:)
1141:--
1041:)
1027:)
879:,
875:,
426:/
322:/
318:/
314::
226::
218:,
214:,
210:,
206:,
169:)
67:;
1726:(
1707:(
1662:(
1633:(
1601:(
1586:(
1580:"
1529:(
1482:(
1453:(
1411:(
1374:(
1340:(
1310:(
1273:(
1259:(
1255:.
1236:(
1184:(
1164:(
1145:(
1132:.
1056:[
1037:(
1023:(
1007:(
925:.
824:.
790:.
709:.
588:.
411:.
294::
220:5
216:4
212:3
208:2
204:1
201::
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
71:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.