90:
80:
53:
22:
240:
to submit a detailed writeup on EM CR, with diagrams, equations, etc., then maybe it would warrant its own article. I would also like to see some discussion of general resonator theory in the resonator article, maybe a few approachable example equations for common cases (e.g. springs or crystal radios). I plan to submit some of this material this Fall (2006).
639:
unobtrusive gifs. That said, I strongly agree that animations need a prominent ON/OFF button. However I think the default should be ON. With an opt-in, the readers who will most benefit from the animation, the uneducated and technically-inexperienced, will not notice or understand the button and will never turn the animation on. --
455:
is commonly used to mean the multiplication of a conjugate power variable by a passive system. For instance, using mechanical advantage to increase velocity, or using an impedance transformer to increase sound pressure. The analogous situation in electrical engineering would be voltage (or current)
296:
The patents section probably should be clarified to indicate that it only pertains to electromagnetic resonators. This article currently refers to other types of resonators (acoustic resonators) that I'm guessing are classified differently by the USPTO, though I haven't done any research to find out
262:
Agreed. At least, the definition is incomplete. It states that a resonator is a system which resonate strongly for some specific frequencies. This is simply incorrect. ANY system having a dominant specific mode would be a 'resonator'!. A resonator in this context is NOT a system, but a DEVICE, 'built
239:
I think the articles can be merged- electromagnetic cavity resonators are a specific example of a resonant device, like guitars, auto exhaust pipes, quartz crystals, etc. The current article titled "Cavity resonators" is sort of broad and shallow and doesn't really need its own entry. If someone were
638:
My humble opinion: I think animations are absolutely wonderful tools for getting across physics and engineering concepts to general readers, and should be used more (I have created a number of gifs for WP articles) (but not this one). I suspect only a minority of readers are irritated by reasonably
551:
is relevant to this, but there has been no activity for years. The last comment was someone saying they would get a discussion going but nothing seems to have happened. The holdup seems to be mostly that the devs are unsure if this is a feature that would be much used. I suggest starting a
648:
Facebook currently shows animated GIF frozen by default. It displays a clear overlay that looks like a button and acts like a button – a simple click starts the animation. I think most people can handle that. A web page should never show an uninvited animation. —
546:
I would love it if something was done in core code about gifs so users could turn them on and off at will. That's the real solution. This article isn't so bad, but some are so completely littered with animations that they are virtually unreadable.
327:
The link under "Websites" does not seem to redirect to its listed description, but rather to what seems to be an endorsement for a commercial website. I may not have pursued deeply enough to find the listed reference, but I shouldn't have to.
263:
for achieving an specific dominant mode', in order to be used by other systems. Also the definition of resonator as a 'single degree' or as a 'simple oscillator' would be ok, but just as a definition, not as a different context.
487:
But there will be radiation losses; they are intrinsic to the design. Very significant losses, according to the main article, from radiation out of the open end of the bore, at least in the basic design described here.
222:
I think better linking/labelling would do the trick. I'm happy that the CR article stand alone - perhaps re-labelled "Cavity resonator - Electromagnetic" or something similar, and move the flute references
370:. The word doc talks about marimba resonators at length, but I don't think it's worthy of inclusion as an external link here on this page. Maybe on the marimba page... I'm taking the link out.
678:
485:
In the absence of radiation losses, the effective resistance of the LGR is determined by the resistivity and electromagnetic skin depth of the conductor used to make the resonator.
460:
is correct terminology, but of course electrical engineers would normally mean active amplification even when the device is a voltage amplifier, as opposed to a power amplifier.
158:
63:
146:
673:
136:
683:
89:
668:
196:
112:
312:
407:
343:
Good catch, those spamlinks keep popping up. Get rid of it, and if you can find from the page history who added it, be sure to put a
618:
181:
The automotive section on resonators is very short, and even biased. More work needs to be done at making it a little more detailed.
103:
58:
33:
456:
multiplication. This can be done by a transformer for instance, but can also be achieved with a resonator. In this context
556:
to test whether this idea has support and then report that back on
Phabricator to encourage the devs to actually do it.
333:
279:
688:
366:. Maybe the website author used to have the listed book featured but moved it in a redesign. I think they moved it to
404:
What about 'cavity filters' etc. they don't amplify, do they? Sounds like some sort of parametric amplifier to me.
367:
251:
I also think that the articles can be merged as the current (Cavity resonator) article is not specific enough.
192:
308:
39:
21:
562:
494:
466:
411:
329:
300:
267:
184:
650:
213:
188:
304:
375:
111:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
241:
581:
557:
489:
461:
423:
601:
And if I push the right edge of the window towards the left the window remains beside the text.
344:
371:
275:
553:
628:
516:
640:
577:
534:
348:
95:
662:
619:
Knowledge (XXG):Village_pump_(policy)#Any_animated_GIF_should_have_an_ON/OFF_switch
252:
509:
This constantly playing animated GIF is annoying !! and should be made closable!!.
484:
271:
79:
52:
624:
528:
512:
224:
85:
108:
400:
an electromagnetic wave is called a cavity resonator." (my italics)
451:
In some fields, such as mechanical or audio engineering, the term
653:
643:
632:
567:
537:
520:
499:
471:
442:
415:
379:
353:
337:
316:
283:
255:
244:
227:
216:
200:
15:
533:
How about just moving it down so it is not visible at top? --
234:
I also think that better linking/labeling would do the trick.
548:
363:
212:
Seems that these 2 pages should be merged. Any opinion?
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
603:I would greatley appreciate this suggested switch.
362:Flamurai added the basic link a long time ago in
679:Start-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
8:
396:"A hollow conductor that uses resonance to
19:
605:Plus: I would love, if animated gifs were
298:
182:
47:
49:
7:
101:This article is within the scope of
595:the first seven lines of text (not
121:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Physics
38:It is of interest to the following
422:I've reworded that, sound ok now?
297:what class/subclass is applicable.
14:
88:
78:
51:
20:
674:Mid-importance physics articles
505:The animated GIF is annoying !!
141:This article has been rated as
684:Start-Class acoustics articles
568:09:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
538:18:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
521:15:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
472:14:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
617:I have made this suggestion:
443:20:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
416:21:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
388:2.1 Cavity resonators section
380:15:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
354:12:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
338:10:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
156:This article is supported by
115:and see a list of open tasks.
669:Start-Class physics articles
654:10:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
644:19:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
256:16:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
245:23:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
124:Template:WikiProject Physics
633:07:54, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
705:
228:01:01, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
147:project's importance scale
317:13:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
217:15:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
155:
140:
73:
46:
500:09:02, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
392:This sounds a bit iffy:
284:04:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
201:22:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
549:Phabricator task T61217
28:This article is rated
345:spam warning template
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
591:screen the image is
347:on his talk page. --
159:Acoustics Taskforce
104:WikiProject Physics
689:Acoustics articles
480:Loop-gap resonator
323:"Websites" listing
177:Automotive section
34:content assessment
651:GhostInTheMachine
319:
303:comment added by
287:
270:comment added by
203:
187:comment added by
174:
173:
170:
169:
166:
165:
696:
623:Please ping me.
585:
532:
511:Please ping me.
486:
439:
436:
435:
432:
431:
351:
286:
264:
129:
128:
127:physics articles
125:
122:
119:
98:
93:
92:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
704:
703:
699:
698:
697:
695:
694:
693:
659:
658:
575:
526:
507:
482:
437:
433:
429:
427:
425:
390:
349:
325:
294:
292:Patents section
265:
214:134.193.168.253
210:
189:206.248.132.180
179:
126:
123:
120:
117:
116:
94:
87:
67:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
702:
700:
692:
691:
686:
681:
676:
671:
661:
660:
657:
656:
646:
614:
604:
602:
600:
586:
573:
572:
571:
570:
552:discussion at
541:
540:
510:
506:
503:
481:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
446:
445:
402:
401:
389:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
357:
356:
324:
321:
305:63.225.141.201
293:
290:
289:
288:
259:
258:
248:
247:
236:
235:
231:
230:
209:
206:
178:
175:
172:
171:
168:
167:
164:
163:
154:
151:
150:
143:Mid-importance
139:
133:
132:
130:
113:the discussion
100:
99:
96:Physics portal
83:
71:
70:
68:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
701:
690:
687:
685:
682:
680:
677:
675:
672:
670:
667:
666:
664:
655:
652:
647:
645:
642:
637:
636:
635:
634:
630:
626:
621:
620:
615:
612:
608:
598:
594:
590:
583:
582:Spinningspark
579:
569:
566:
565:
561:
560:
555:
550:
545:
544:
543:
542:
539:
536:
530:
525:
524:
523:
522:
518:
514:
504:
502:
501:
498:
497:
493:
492:
479:
473:
470:
469:
465:
464:
459:
454:
450:
449:
448:
447:
444:
441:
440:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
413:
409:
408:220.101.28.25
399:
395:
394:
393:
387:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:this word doc
365:
361:
360:
359:
358:
355:
352:
346:
342:
341:
340:
339:
335:
331:
322:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
291:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
261:
260:
257:
254:
250:
249:
246:
243:
238:
237:
233:
232:
229:
226:
221:
220:
219:
218:
215:
207:
205:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
176:
161:
160:
153:
152:
148:
144:
138:
135:
134:
131:
114:
110:
106:
105:
97:
91:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
622:
616:
610:
606:
596:
592:
588:
574:
563:
558:
508:
495:
490:
483:
467:
462:
457:
452:
424:
405:
403:
397:
391:
326:
299:— Preceding
295:
266:— Preceding
211:
183:— Preceding
180:
157:
142:
102:
40:WikiProjects
372:Binksternet
30:Start-class
663:Categories
641:Chetvorno
578:Chetvorno
535:Chetvorno
364:this diff
350:Chetvorno
64:Acoustics
559:Spinning
491:Spinning
463:Spinning
313:contribs
301:unsigned
280:contribs
268:unsigned
197:contribs
185:unsigned
611:default
458:amplify
453:amplify
398:amplify
253:Ksbrown
242:Mhopeng
145:on the
118:Physics
109:Physics
59:Physics
607:halted
593:beside
554:WP:VPP
272:Hypfco
223:out.--
208:Merge?
36:scale.
625:Steue
597:above
564:Spark
529:Steue
513:Steue
496:Spark
468:Spark
438:Spark
225:Snori
629:talk
580:and
517:talk
412:talk
376:talk
334:talk
309:talk
276:talk
193:talk
609:by
587:on
330:MVD
204:‎
137:Mid
665::
631:)
599:).
589:my
519:)
434:ng
430:ni
428:in
426:Sp
414:)
406:--
378:)
336:)
315:)
311:•
282:)
278:•
199:)
195:•
62::
627:(
613:.
584::
576:@
531::
527:@
515:(
410:(
374:(
332:(
307:(
274:(
191:(
162:.
149:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
