Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Rigel

Source 📝

389: 583:. There is also extinction, which many people forget about. In this case it isn't obvious how many magnitudes of extinction have been included in the calculation because the paper goes directly from the distance modulus and colour excess to the absolute magnitude. However, the difference between the distance modulus and the absolute magnitude makes it fairly clear that there are about 0.16 magnitudes of extinction in there. That is consistent with the E(B-V) of 0.05. 521: 237: 380: 270: 449: 422: 207: 459: 655:
The parallax in the starbox is for Rigel B. It should probably have a note to that effect since it isn't obvious from the reference. Yes, it is fairly accurate, but it is also somewhat indirect and potentially doesn't reflect the actual distance of Rigel. The parallax shown at Simbad for Rigel A
578:
Yes, you missed something. First, the references given for the apparent magnitude, the distance, and the absolute magnitude are not the same, so they are not necessarily consistent. In fact the reference for the absolute magnitude (which I just changed to the original paper that derived the value
562:
Rigel is actually a multi star system. But the energy output of its components other than the main star are negligable. Its average apperent magnitude is m=0.13 and the distance is d=860 ly. With these figures its absolute magnitude should be M= -6.97 . But the article gives the figure as M= -7.84.
851: 618:
Thanks for pointing that out. I took a look and it seems that the infobox value was obtained using another method, but the value of 860 ly (863, to be exact) is the more widely accepted value. I have updated the infobox and added a reference.
791: 821: 153: 786: 637:
The distance isn't consistent now to the measured parallax - which i think is a pretty accurate method for this distance. The simbad database also states that the Parallax is actually 3.78 (compare:
687: 811: 276: 656:
is the old Hipparcos parallax because Gaia can't yet provide a useful parallax for such bright stars. The Hipparcos value is still widely-used as the "reference" distance for Rigel.
350: 251: 841: 826: 511: 393: 753:
The sidebar says that the faint companion, or at least one component of it if it is a binary, is on the main sequence. It describes the primary star (component A) as being a
198: 846: 147: 530: 432: 79: 806: 836: 501: 738:
The sidebar says that Rigel is on the main sequence but the text says that it has evolved away from the main sequence. Presumably the text is correct
816: 85: 781: 331: 796: 831: 30: 739: 642: 603:
The first paragraph gives a distance of 860 light-years (260 pc) from Earth. Yet the sidebar lists Distance 1,010 ± 20 ly (309 ± 5 pc).
702:
I rhyme it with Nigel, the 'g' as in jam. Some pronunciation guides give a hard 'g', but I haven't heard this actually being used.
691: 472: 427: 99: 104: 20: 801: 74: 402: 641:). Should the parallax be changed to reflect this value? Or is the gaia data which was used for the 3.2 value more accurate? 246: 65: 44: 269: 168: 206: 185: 716:
And that corresponds to the tri-literal root RJL of the Arabic name (ar-Rijl al-Jauza, the foot of the giant). --
135: 109: 568: 217: 379: 236: 408: 256: 743: 646: 683: 55: 608: 129: 70: 762: 707: 661: 588: 564: 194: 190: 260: 535: 161: 125: 222: 520: 721: 51: 175: 604: 464: 219: 638: 758: 754: 703: 657: 626: 584: 312: 775: 717: 141: 852:
Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
621: 454: 477: 448: 421: 680:
I would rhyme this with Nigel, but is that correct? Would it be a hard G?
24: 221: 579:
instead of one that was just quoting it) assumed a distance of
373: 223: 15: 519: 822:
Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in Physical sciences
766: 747: 725: 711: 695: 665: 650: 632: 612: 592: 572: 792:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
639:
https://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-basic?Ident=Rigel
275:
This article appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as
343: 324: 305: 160: 787:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
812:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Physical sciences
174: 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 842:FA-Class Astronomy articles of Top-importance 8: 827:FA-Class vital articles in Physical sciences 534:, which collaborates on articles related to 476:, which collaborates on articles related to 259:. Even so, if you can update or improve it, 255:as one of the best articles produced by the 249:; it (or a previous version of it) has been 681: 416: 284: 231: 377: 418: 847:FA-Class Astronomical objects articles 807:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles 688:2A01:4C8:1428:C467:F0B7:ED5:AF2E:FE81 486:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Astronomy 7: 470:This article is within the scope of 407:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 837:Top-importance Astronomy articles 782:Knowledge (XXG) featured articles 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 531:WikiProject Astronomical objects 457: 447: 420: 387: 378: 268: 235: 205: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 817:FA-Class level-4 vital articles 506:This article has been rated as 633:18:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC) 613:14:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC) 489:Template:WikiProject Astronomy 1: 666:14:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC) 651:07:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC) 528:This article is supported by 42:Put new text under old text. 797:Old requests for peer review 832:FA-Class Astronomy articles 726:18:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC) 712:17:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC) 696:07:12, 2 January 2022 (UTC) 593:17:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 573:14:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 868: 767:20:36, 21 March 2022 (UTC) 748:11:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC) 512:project's importance scale 351:Featured article candidate 563:Have I missed something? 527: 505: 442: 415: 364: 287: 283: 257:Knowledge (XXG) community 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 277:Today's featured article 802:FA-Class vital articles 524: 279:on September 28, 2020. 75:avoid personal attacks 523: 473:WikiProject Astronomy 401:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 394:level-4 vital article 199:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 536:astronomical objects 433:Astronomical objects 313:Good article nominee 105:No original research 480:on Knowledge (XXG). 734:Evolutionary stage 558:Absolute magnitude 525: 492:Astronomy articles 403:content assessment 288:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 698: 686:comment added by 550: 549: 546: 545: 542: 541: 372: 371: 360: 359: 230: 229: 66:Assume good faith 43: 859: 629: 624: 582: 494: 493: 490: 487: 484: 467: 465:Astronomy portal 462: 461: 460: 451: 444: 443: 438: 435: 424: 417: 400: 391: 390: 383: 382: 374: 367:Featured article 365:Current status: 346: 327: 325:December 8, 2019 308: 285: 272: 247:featured article 239: 232: 224: 210: 209: 200: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 867: 866: 862: 861: 860: 858: 857: 856: 772: 771: 755:blue supergiant 736: 678: 627: 622: 601: 580: 560: 491: 488: 485: 482: 481: 463: 458: 456: 436: 430: 398: 388: 342: 323: 304: 226: 225: 220: 197: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 865: 863: 855: 854: 849: 844: 839: 834: 829: 824: 819: 814: 809: 804: 799: 794: 789: 784: 774: 773: 770: 769: 735: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 677: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 600: 597: 596: 595: 559: 556: 554: 548: 547: 544: 543: 540: 539: 526: 516: 515: 508:Top-importance 504: 498: 497: 495: 469: 468: 452: 440: 439: 437:Top‑importance 425: 413: 412: 406: 384: 370: 369: 362: 361: 358: 357: 354: 347: 339: 338: 335: 328: 320: 319: 316: 309: 301: 300: 297: 294: 290: 289: 281: 280: 273: 265: 264: 240: 228: 227: 218: 216: 215: 212: 211: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 864: 853: 850: 848: 845: 843: 840: 838: 835: 833: 830: 828: 825: 823: 820: 818: 815: 813: 810: 808: 805: 803: 800: 798: 795: 793: 790: 788: 785: 783: 780: 779: 777: 768: 764: 760: 756: 752: 751: 750: 749: 745: 741: 740:155.137.25.15 733: 727: 723: 719: 715: 714: 713: 709: 705: 701: 700: 699: 697: 693: 689: 685: 676:Pronunciation 675: 667: 663: 659: 654: 653: 652: 648: 644: 643:194.113.40.61 640: 636: 635: 634: 631: 630: 625: 617: 616: 615: 614: 610: 606: 598: 594: 590: 586: 577: 576: 575: 574: 570: 566: 557: 555: 552: 537: 533: 532: 522: 518: 517: 513: 509: 503: 500: 499: 496: 479: 475: 474: 466: 455: 453: 450: 446: 445: 441: 434: 429: 426: 423: 419: 414: 410: 404: 396: 395: 385: 381: 376: 375: 368: 363: 355: 353: 352: 348: 345: 344:June 30, 2020 341: 340: 336: 334: 333: 329: 326: 322: 321: 317: 315: 314: 310: 307: 306:April 1, 2020 303: 302: 298: 295: 292: 291: 286: 282: 278: 274: 271: 267: 266: 262: 258: 254: 253: 248: 244: 241: 238: 234: 233: 214: 213: 208: 204: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 737: 682:— Preceding 679: 620: 602: 565:Nedim Ardoğa 561: 553: 551: 529: 507: 471: 409:WikiProjects 392: 366: 349: 330: 311: 261:please do so 250: 242: 202: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 605:KevinTernes 332:Peer review 148:free images 31:not a forum 776:Categories 759:Lithopsian 704:Lithopsian 658:Lithopsian 585:Lithopsian 252:identified 483:Astronomy 478:Astronomy 428:Astronomy 397:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 684:unsigned 599:Distance 399:FA-class 356:Promoted 337:Reviewed 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 718:Elphion 510:on the 296:Process 203:90 days 154:WP refs 142:scholar 628:Verbum 581:360 pc 405:scale. 318:Listed 299:Result 126:Google 386:This 245:is a 243:Rigel 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 25:Rigel 763:talk 744:talk 722:talk 708:talk 692:talk 662:talk 647:talk 609:talk 589:talk 569:talk 293:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 757:. 623:Pax 502:Top 176:TWL 778:: 765:) 746:) 724:) 710:) 694:) 664:) 649:) 611:) 591:) 571:) 431:: 201:: 193:, 156:) 54:; 761:( 742:( 720:( 706:( 690:( 660:( 645:( 619:- 607:( 587:( 567:( 538:. 514:. 411:: 263:. 195:2 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Rigel
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
2

Featured article
featured article
identified

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.