734:
711:
697:
666:
642:
615:
605:
580:
566:
552:
521:
487:
49:
1153:
1140:
1118:
1105:
959:
The lead's a bit short - remember it's supposed to summarize the entire article, so I'd recommend adding a few other things, like her participation in the Boxer
Rebellion and serving as the East Asia Squadron flagship in 1900. I like to put a line or two on technical stuff (like main armament, speed,
948:
and thought I'd take a look at what I can. There are some other MOS issues - the footnotes need to be formatted the same (i.e., link them all or none, use "p." or "pg" consistently), ensure all books in the bibliography section are cited, or else move them to a "Further reading" section or remove
960:
size), though I know some don't like doing that. As an aside, numbers should be spelled out if they are followed by a numerical descriptor (like twenty 305mm shells). I fixed the two instances here. Otherwise, the article looks great. Nice work, Buggie.
1032:
The entire design and construction section, for example. The Boxer
Rebellion is a fairly notable event and merits mentioning in the lead. On a related note, you may want to look through accounts of the Boxer Rebellion for a fuller picture of what
841:
section. Though everything I can think of in relation to this article is linked from the article's body, I would ask everyone to comment on possibilities. That said, currently I see no other issues (except for mentioned above) with the
818:
question: I have no access to the sources. After ending the initial review step I'll take care of bringing other's attention to the book list; though until any claims about inaccuracy are received, I'll assume the good referencing. โ
54:
1040:
As for images, they need a date of publication (not the same thing as the date the photo was taken), and the document they were published in (i.e., a newspaper, naval annual, postcard, etc.) See for example
133:
1014:
Kind of don't get the publication date Parsec. All of them, bar the color print, ahve the date written there. IS there something wrong with that? I'll axe the color print and do the other things ASAP.
129:
114:
280:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
59:
949:
them altogether (for instance, Gardiner et. al., Jung, Preston, Spector, and Wood), and one of the two images of the ship sinking need to be moved or removed. Text sandwiching is a no-go.
106:
277:
982:
What do You think is not summarized in a lead? The Boxer
Rebellion is barely mentioned in the article... Given the article's length, the longer lead would just be an overkill, IMHO.
198:
226:
87:
77:
412:
1076:
I'll add the design to the lead, as well as lazily change the images so as they're only using acceptable ones instead of look for dates on the current ones.
122:
17:
230:
222:
214:
99:
455:
432:
876:
1058:
General practice at FAC/ACR/GAN is for sources not directly used in the article to be placed in a further reading section. If the source
689:
218:
461:
352:
82:
572:
300:
288:
404:
1045:
I uploaded of a contemporary warship. The color print is actually the only photo that is currently usable (though it needs a
163:
416:
269:
493:
273:
210:
1042:
880:
538:
513:
449:
This subsection is intended for reviewer's notes on review process. Please, don't edit it unless You are reviewer.
408:
339:
243:
178:
367:
327:
23:
1187:
1172:
1085:
1071:
1009:
969:
928:
914:
896:
870:
855:
828:
809:
773:
167:
952:
As for images in general, we need a pre-1917 date of publication all of the images save the color print from
861:
Thanks for the review. I will admit I forgot about the lead and the
References section. My bad. I'll fix it.
760:
compliance in full, I have already found the substantial shortcoming of the lead section: it doesn't mention
988:
Why do You think all the books from
Bibliography should be used for inline citations? As far as I can see,
945:
304:
905:
section; instead I just ask to think about possible entries. Right now I don't see any candidates. โ
782:
failure: the article doesn't follow single style of referencing: while most books are listed in the
1081:
1067:
1019:
965:
924:
892:
866:
761:
679:
501:
389:
385:
1183:
1168:
1005:
910:
851:
824:
805:
794:
769:
428:
157:
1026:
393:
993:
628:
497:
465:
259:
258:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
989:
843:
757:
703:
509:
505:
558:
356:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
1077:
1063:
1049:
1015:
961:
920:
888:
862:
1179:
1164:
1001:
906:
847:
820:
801:
765:
153:
985:
I completely fail to understand Your point about the images. What did you mean?
884:
1062:
consulted, it needs to be cited directly to meet current sourcing standards.
764:, though the ship is probably best known for being his place of death. โ
366:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
338:
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
875:
FYI, See also sections are rarely used, if at all in ship articles, see
1101:
The lead should mention all important events from the ship's history
1029:. Basically, you don't want two images sandwiching text between them.
748:
Please add comments about the changes or reviewer's mistakes here.
956:. That may help decide what to do with the other sinking photo.
800:
format, which violates the common style of the article. โ
1178:
Well, it seems there is nothing to wait for any more. โ
141:
110:
790:section instead. Also, these two books are not in
199:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
24:Talk:Russian battleship Petropavlovsk (1897)/GA1
8:
688:(images are tagged and non-free images have
18:Talk:Russian battleship Petropavlovsk (1894)
37:
68:
40:
1037:and the Russian contingent was doing.
756:failure: though I didn't examine the
7:
877:Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895)
1055:tag added to the description page).
201:; spelling and grammar are correct;
683:, where possible and appropriate.
31:
901:Please note, I don't request the
197:the prose is clear, concise, and
1151:
1138:
1116:
1103:
732:
709:
695:
664:
640:
637:Fair representation without bias
613:
603:
578:
564:
550:
519:
485:
464:for what the criteria are, and
1127:Printed sources' verification
278:could reasonably be challenged
1:
413:valid non-free use rationales
733:
710:
696:
665:
641:
614:
604:
579:
565:
551:
520:
486:
1188:16:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
1173:10:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1097:So, the current status is:
1086:02:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
1072:02:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
1010:17:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
979:What is "text sandwiching"?
970:16:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
929:16:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
915:16:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
897:16:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
871:16:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
856:15:54, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
829:15:42, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
810:15:42, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
774:15:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
168:14:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
1204:
1163:Am I missing something? โ
881:Helgoland class battleship
260:the layout style guideline
1025:On text sandwiching, see
919:Ok. I've fixed the rest.
475:reasonably well written
431:to the topic, and have
944:- I saw the notice on
702:(appropriate use with
468:for what they are not)
677:It is illustrated by
629:neutral point of view
593:broad in its coverage
317:Broad in its coverage
209:it complies with the
1114:Style of references
837:: the article lacks
786:section, two are in
301:copyright violations
289:no original research
249:no original research
1180:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
1165:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
1002:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
907:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
848:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
821:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
802:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
766:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
762:Vasily Vereshchagin
690:fair use rationales
370:or content dispute.
276:. All content that
833:Further detail on
661:No edit wars, etc.
534:factually accurate
409:copyright statuses
380:, if possible, by
231:list incorporation
976:A few questions:
704:suitable captions
433:suitable captions
415:are provided for
326:it addresses the
96:
95:
22:(Redirected from
1195:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1124:
1120:
1119:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1054:
1048:
954:Le Petit Journal
799:
793:
736:
735:
713:
712:
699:
698:
668:
667:
644:
643:
617:
616:
607:
606:
582:
581:
568:
567:
559:reliable sources
554:
553:
523:
522:
489:
488:
437:
436:
421:
420:
417:non-free content
398:
397:
372:
371:
358:
357:
344:
343:
332:
331:
321:
320:
309:
308:
293:
292:
282:
281:
270:reliable sources
264:
263:
253:
252:
235:
234:
203:
202:
192:
191:
146:
137:
118:
50:Copyvio detector
38:
27:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1152:
1150:
1139:
1137:
1117:
1115:
1104:
1102:
1052:
1046:
797:
791:
745:
626:It follows the
600:(major aspects)
446:
426:
425:
402:
401:
376:
375:
362:
361:
350:
349:
337:
336:
325:
324:
315:
314:
299:it contains no
298:
297:
286:
285:
268:
267:
257:
256:
241:
240:
213:guidelines for
211:Manual of Style
208:
207:
196:
195:
186:
185:
175:
127:
104:
98:
92:
64:
36:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1201:
1199:
1191:
1190:
1161:
1160:
1147:
1134:
1125:
1112:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1056:
1038:
1030:
999:
998:
997:
986:
983:
980:
973:
972:
957:
950:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
887:for examples.
846:compliance. โ
744:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
557:(citations to
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
470:
469:
445:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
423:
373:
359:
347:
346:
345:
334:
312:
311:
310:
295:
283:
265:
238:
237:
236:
223:words to watch
205:
174:
171:
147:
94:
93:
91:
90:
85:
80:
74:
71:
70:
66:
65:
63:
62:
60:External links
57:
52:
46:
43:
42:
35:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1200:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1158:
1148:
1145:
1135:
1133:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1113:
1110:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1051:
1044:
1039:
1036:
1035:Petropavlovsk
1031:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1000:
995:
991:
987:
984:
981:
978:
977:
975:
974:
971:
967:
963:
958:
955:
951:
947:
943:
940:
939:
930:
926:
922:
918:
917:
916:
912:
908:
904:
900:
899:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
878:
874:
873:
872:
868:
864:
860:
859:
858:
857:
853:
849:
845:
840:
836:
831:
830:
826:
822:
817:
812:
811:
807:
803:
796:
789:
785:
781:
776:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
750:
749:
742:
730:
727:
726:
724:
721:
715:
714:
707:
705:
693:
691:
685:
684:
682:
681:
676:
670:
669:
662:
659:
658:
656:
652:
646:
645:
638:
635:
634:
632:
630:
625:
619:
618:
611:
601:
597:
596:
594:
590:
584:
583:
576:
574:
562:
560:
548:
544:
543:
541:
540:
535:
531:
525:
524:
517:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
483:
479:
478:
476:
472:
471:
467:
463:
459:
457:
453:
452:
451:
450:
443:
434:
430:
424:
418:
414:
410:
406:
400:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
374:
369:
365:
360:
355:
354:
348:
341:
340:summary style
335:
330:of the topic;
329:
323:
322:
318:
313:
306:
302:
296:
290:
284:
279:
275:
271:
266:
261:
255:
254:
250:
246:
245:
239:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
215:lead sections
212:
206:
200:
194:
193:
189:
184:
183:
182:
180:
172:
170:
169:
165:
162:
159:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
103:
102:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
75:
73:
72:
67:
61:
58:
56:
53:
51:
48:
47:
45:
44:
39:
33:
25:
19:
1162:
1156:
1143:
1131:
1128:
1121:
1108:
1096:
1059:
1034:
953:
941:
902:
838:
834:
832:
815:
813:
787:
784:Bibliography
783:
779:
777:
753:
751:
747:
746:
728:
722:
701:
687:
678:
660:
654:
636:
627:
609:
599:
592:
570:
556:
547:(references)
546:
537:
533:
491:
481:
474:
454:
448:
447:
381:
377:
363:
351:
328:main aspects
316:
287:it contains
274:cited inline
248:
242:
188:Well-written
187:
179:good article
176:
160:
150:
149:
142:
138:
124:Article talk
123:
119:
100:
97:
88:Instructions
506:word choice
407:with their
378:Illustrated
111:visual edit
1043:this image
885:SMS Goeben
814:Regarding
788:References
778:Regarding
752:Regarding
743:Discussion
539:verifiable
427:media are
403:media are
305:plagiarism
244:Verifiable
55:Authorship
41:GA toolbox
1078:Buggie111
1064:Parsecboy
1016:Buggie111
994:otherwise
962:Parsecboy
921:Buggie111
889:Buggie111
863:Buggie111
795:cite book
729:Pass/Fail
610:(focused)
151:Reviewer:
78:Templates
69:Reviewing
34:GA Review
1149:Numbers
1132:Awaiting
946:WT:SHIPS
903:See also
839:See also
429:relevant
384:such as
368:edit war
173:Criteria
164:contribs
154:Czarkoff
83:Criteria
1136:Images
992:states
942:Comment
723:Overall
510:fiction
482:(prose)
353:Neutral
227:fiction
134:history
115:history
101:Article
990:WP:MOS
844:WP:MOS
758:WP:MOS
680:images
655:stable
653:It is
631:policy
591:It is
532:It is
512:, and
502:layout
473:It is
458:review
444:Status
411:, and
405:tagged
386:images
364:Stable
229:, and
219:layout
1050:PD-US
514:lists
460:(see
394:audio
392:, or
390:video
382:media
247:with
143:Watch
16:<
1184:talk
1169:talk
1157:Done
1144:Done
1122:Done
1109:Done
1082:talk
1068:talk
1027:here
1020:talk
1006:talk
966:talk
925:talk
911:talk
893:talk
867:talk
852:talk
835:1(b)
825:talk
816:2(c)
806:talk
780:2(a)
770:talk
754:1(b)
536:and
498:lead
496:for
466:here
462:here
272:are
181:is:
158:talk
130:edit
107:edit
494:MoS
422:and
333:and
303:or
294:and
204:and
1186:)
1171:)
1084:)
1070:)
1060:is
1053:}}
1047:{{
1022:)
1008:)
968:)
927:)
913:)
895:)
883:,
879:,
869:)
854:)
827:)
808:)
798:}}
792:{{
772:)
731::
725::
708::
700:b
694::
686:a
663::
657:.
639::
633:.
612::
608:b
602::
598:a
595:.
577::
573:OR
569:c
563::
555:b
549::
545:a
542:.
518::
508:,
504:,
500:,
490:b
484::
480:a
477:.
456:GA
388:,
342:).
225:,
221:,
217:,
177:A
166:)
132:|
113:|
109:|
1182:(
1167:(
1129:ฯ
1080:(
1066:(
1018:(
1004:(
996:.
964:(
923:(
909:(
891:(
865:(
850:(
823:(
804:(
768:(
706:)
692:)
575:)
571:(
561:)
516:)
492:(
435:.
419:;
396::
319::
307:.
291:;
262:;
251::
233:.
190::
161:ยท
156:(
139:ยท
136:)
128:(
120:ยท
117:)
105:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.