Talk:White supremacy/Archive 5

2176:, we found a suitable version between us on what to use, so your revertion back to one of our previously discussed wordings based on your personal preferences is flawed. As is your argument about the content being a misportrayal of the source, which says, "Captain America was created by writer Joe Simon and artist Jack Kirby—both of whom were Jewish—in 1941. In the superhero's first appearance, he can be seen punching Nazi leader Adolf Hitler in the face. Despite his overt anti-Nazi overtones, his origin story, which involves a physically weak man gaining superpowers after being injected with a super-soldier serum, has become a dog whistle for white supremacist ideology." Nowhere does it say that he "ALWAYS" fights Nazis at all, and considering the topic of this article and that white supremacists are not synonymous with Nazis, it doesn't make sense to have the phrasing as you've put it. 920:"However, although they caution against the agendas of "watchdog" organizations, their own conclusions raise questions. Other researchers will disagree with their downplaying Klan and skinhead violence and neo-Nazi and Christian Identity race hatred and anti-Semitism (which breaks through only in reproduced Movement cartoons)... Dobratz and Shanks-Meile have strong criticism for government attempts at policing the far Right, and they talk of "McCarthyism" and law enforcement acting in accord with "state interests to maintain the status quo." Violent separatist groups and individuals are explained as caught up in the American paramilitary culture, with violence mainly resulting from the interaction with overly aggressive law enforcement authorities." 2731:. This image is so deeply offensive and dehumanizing that its only encyclopedic value would be to illustrate precisely these aspects of Nazi propaganda. In my view the primary thing this image would serve to do were it to be included here would be to give pornographic pleasure to neo-Nazis who happen to be perusing the article and cause People of Color who may be looking to this page for information to feel gratuitously harassed. (Please note that it is clearly not Sweetstache's intention to cause these reactions –– I think their good faith is clear from the context –– but nonetheless I believe that this will be the likely outcome of inclusion.) Per OMIMG we should include such offensive images 2757:

lead image, and I think I see your point on that. But to shy away from including the image at all because it will (most definitely) shock many people seems to doing marginalized groups a great injustice. White supremacy has led to their mass murder in the past, and making that connection clear is, IMHO, for the best. We ought not repeat the dark part of history that this poster came from. The more people that understand the fact--especially with a dose of shock--that mask-off white supremacy has only recently been marginalized in the Western world, the better. I think there is significant value in associating the belief with the feeling of shock itself. This image is used over at

1966: 2567: 1232: 1059: 1540:

adhering to the opposite ideology of a specific page. Would you include all of major political parties that promote democracy on a page about Royalism? Additionally, it should be noted that while in the past the Nation of Islam embraced Black Supremacy and the first incarnation of the organization's teachings inspired much if not most organized modern day Black Supremacists, the group that now calls itself the Nation of Islam as well as its comparatively Liberal direct successor organization-the

912:"But even assuming that this third represents racists generally (which is doubtful, but in any case unanswerable, given that sampling procedures are never discussed), the word "attribute" gives the game away; just because people attribute their behavior to some factor does not mean it actually causes them to act that way.The authors could have profited from C. Wright Mills's distinction between motivations (causes) and motives (justifications and excuses)." 31: 2120:

alt-right in college campus recruitment in 2017, an ironic co-optation because Captain America had always battled against Nazis in the comics, and was created by Jewish cartoonists", and I just don't think using the term 'Nazis' when the first half of the sentence talks about "alt-right" promoting is accurate, since the alt right does not necessarily mean Nazi. In fact, neo-Nazis are said to be a minority in the alt-right groups

1266:

to expand this entry, or per WP:GNG craft a new article, on this social movement. I'd like to help with this, but haven't the capacity for the time being, so in the meantime I am posting an initial bibliography of relevant books in case other editors who have been involved in the development of this article recently may be interested in taking that on, or flagging the issue to other editors. Tagging:

2918: 2518: 1184: 1011: 464: 388: 2856:

rhetorics, thinking, or ideology. When Nazis used the term "negro", it was to attack their opponents as being too friendly towards or being corrupted by Black people - in the case of the poster the opponent under attack is the Catholic Church, in many other cases it was American culture, e.g. in the form of Jazz music. That's why I think the poster doesn't belong here at all. --

2443: 2078: 871: 2124:. Plus, Captain America fights actual Nazis, whereas any Nazi ideology in the alt right spectrum would in fact be neo-Nazi, and that's not QUITE the same thing. And your added wording of "had ALWAYS battled Nazis" isnt quite accurate as he only fights against Nazis for a part of his comic run, not even a majority of it. 2016:"racism," "white supremacy," and "far-right" meaningless. This very Knowledge article itself briefly mentions how modern-day far-left academics deliberately misuse the term "white supremacy" in order to sow confusion and conflict, and to demonize their political opponents. If you were being serious and not hyperbolic, 2756:

Is there a way in which one can pictorially represent the idea of "white supremacy" without shocking large numbers of people? Its logical conclusion runs so contrary to modern liberal democratic ideals and morality that the belief itself is shocking. Maybe that's an argument against including it as a

2709:

Lead images should be natural and appropriate representations of the topic; they should not only illustrate the topic specifically, but also be the type of image used for similar purposes in high-quality reference works, and therefore what our readers will expect to see. Lead images are not required,

1450:

You cite from a good variety of reliable sources. My only suggestion is that, in the lead section, the note about Christianity does seem somewhat biased. I think it’s most important that you edit that part about white supremacist views in Christianity, or at least be more clear in how you mean that

1265:

There are a number of WP:RS academic books, encyclopedias and peer-reviewed articles published over 20+ years that describe the ideological movement associated with white supremacy as the "white power" movement. I see "white power" is redirected here, and there's a little coverage, however, I propose

678:

Yes, we do have to. We explain this because it's the entire purpose of the article. Reliable sources don't merely say it's racist, they define it as racist, and we should summarize a topic according to reliable sources. Further, many people come to this talk page disputing that this is racist despite

2855:

German Nazi ideology was built on centuries of prejudice against Jews, while white suprematism was built on centuries of economic exploitation of Black people. The two topics should be treated differently. While Hitler had some Black people murdered or sterilized, whiteness was not important for his

738:

Nobody is disputing that it's racist. What is in dispute is the necessity of putting the word 'racist' in the lead. Try the converse: 'white supremacism is the non-racist belief that white people are superior to people of other races'. Does that make any sense? No. There's really no need to describe

2784:

is typically a form of argument we avoid in talk page discussions. I do want to emphasize that it's clear to me you're coming at this from a genuine concern to improve the encyclopedia. We just have different intuitions about what is going to be helpful to readers, and the guidelines leave a lot of

2549:

It is unreasonable to make the words "white supremacY" (Historical Events) equal to "White supremacISM" (belief). The article seems to be focused on "white supremacISM" (belief). A separate WIKI for historical examples of White SupremacY around the World should be created, to include for example

1544:

both reject Black Supremacy. When the Nation of Islam was re-instituted in 1977, the new group kept many of the original incarnation's extreme beliefs, including several a reasonable person would find hard not to consider racist; but officially rejected Black Supremacy and continues to teach racial

1112:

Given that he appears well credentialed and published in reliable and not fringy sources on these topics, I am not too concerned with the emphasis here. Not my area of expertise, so if we start to have contrary views from other reliable sources and especially sources suggesting he is fringe for the

1643:

Also, listening to the main stream media - the current newsycle is constantly driving home the idea that "white supremacy" is responsible for almost everything negative in the world today. I'm sure there must be hundreds or thousands of examples and people that can be cited as "white supremacists"

1539:

Then if anything you're saying the Nation of Islam should be included in the "See Also" of the Black Supremacy page not this one? The opposite of Christian Identity would arguably be Black Identity or Black Supremacy? The see also section is not necessarily meant to include all major organizations

1470:

Your revisions are appropriate and structure is clear and sensible. I think it might help to make the revisions to the lead section about Christianity, and I would even suggest adding a section on Critical Race Theory in the history section because that would be really important to this. I think

892:

Related to this proposal I have further concerns about the validity of giving weight to Dobratz alone if even at all in the sourcing. Several reviews of her book indicate problems with her methodology, conclusions and willingness to repeat without analysis the claims of the groups. Examples below.

419:

I suggest changing the language used in the first sentence of the article to match the verbiage used on the article on "Black supremacy". I feel the current article on "White supremacy" reads a bit more biased and negative then the article on "Black supremacy". Both are forms of racial supremacism

1639:

The idea of a person believing their race should not intersect with other races is not the same as believing that their race is superior to other races. Why is that category in a wiki for supremacists? Jared Taylor for example has said many times that he would prefer the races be seperate but has

2119:

I'm glad we managed to work together to sort things out on the BLM article, so I was hoping we'd be able to do likewise on the line in the White Supremacy article. In short, our dispute revolves around this line, "The comic book super hero Captain America was used for dog whistle politics by the

2015:

None of the sources you have cited give any examples of 21st-century white supremacists, just the usual case of Marxist "academics" smearing Donald Trump and conservatives in general as racist and far-right without any evidence, which is part of the Left's agenda to dilute and render the terms

1159:

I am planning on creating a new article on white supremacy specifically in US curriculum (obviously), and I am considering what I might be able to add to this article's section on education to link to this new article. My current idea is to relay several historical and modern examples of white

495:

The statement "In academic usage, particularly in usage which draws on critical race theory or Intersectionality, the term "white supremacy" can also refer to a political or socioeconomic system, in which white people enjoy a structural advantage (privilege) over other ethnic groups, on both a

804:

article created based on the work of one researcher without support of the majority of her field. The vast majority of published news and research says that White separatism is part and parcel of white supremacy. The only objector seems to be Dobratz, but the article as written is giving her

1313:

Burke, K. (2020). “It’s a white fight and we’ve got to win it”: Culture, violence, and the transatlantic far right since the 1970s. In Geary D., Schofield C., & Sutton J. (Eds.), Global white nationalism: From apartheid to Trump (pp. 262-300). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

679:

these sources and despite it's obviousness. Either you accept that it's racist, in which case you are wasting time trying to remove a single word for some poorly explained reason, or you are implying this only because you think some other article should be changed. In that case, you're

1493:, thanks for your edits! The section on white supremacy in education is very relevant. I would urge you to consider adding images to the section and additional linking to other pages. I think it would benefit the article and make the connections to other fields and topics more clear. 2716:, nor is it the type of image one would expect to find in a high-quality reference work on the topic. Indeed, it seems likely that white supremacy is one of those topics mentioned in the MOS for which no easy representation exists, and that is fine. Further, LEADIMAGE also states: 986:

I would like to apologize to everyone for my behavior in the last 2 RfCs. I should've done a better job at listening to everyone's comments. I promise that I'll do a better job at listening to the comments and I will also do a better job at listening to reliable sources.

2672:, the core strength of the image is its age, which speaks to how long white supremacy has been around; it's not a new phenomenon but one that the world has been dealing with for quite some time. In my mind this overrides concerns about the visual darkness of the image. 207:

The last time we saw this editor, he had just read Shirer and had appointed himself an expert on Adolf Hitler. He became a timesink, debating against multiple editors who knew the subject backwards and forwards from reading many books about Hitler and the Third Reich.

1647:

Ultimately, I'm proposing the white seperatist group be removed from this wiki (and either filed under it's own wiki or not), and also add more names of current people that are actual white SUPREMACISTS and haven't been dead since before the Civil Rights movement.

930:

This is not true at all. White Supremacy has its roots in Christianity or Christian Supremacy. Scientific Racism has it's origins in White Supremacy. White Supremacy in America, for example, had it's origins from the English Crown, Charles I and II, circa 1600s.

1671:

who has been widely-described as a white supremacist - listing the most important / influential white supremacists of the 21st century here makes sense, but it shouldn't be an indiscriminate list. Still, some possible sources regarding modern white supremacy:

2646:

It illustrates a clear distinction in the way white/"Aryan" people were perceived in Nazi Germany (a society widely acknowledged as white supremacist) versus Black people. The poster serves as an Exhibit-A of sorts when it comes to what white supremacy is.

160:

I am the opposition. I am your stereotypical white man from mainstream America. I have posted opposition paragraphs today, March 28, 2018, and I hope they are published so we can have a healthy debate on the subject. Please post your credentials below:

1335:

Dyck, K. (2017). The History of White-Power Music outside Europe. In Reichsrock: The International Web of White-Power and Neo-Nazi Hate Music (pp. 104-144). New Brunswick, New Jersey; London: Rutgers University Press. Retrieved October 9, 2020, from

2127:

I thus propose the wording "The comic book super hero Captain America was used for dog whistle politics by the alt-right in college campus recruitment in 2017, an ironic co-optation because Captain America had been known to battle against

2761:

to contextualize the thought process of a regime that slaughtered 17 million people in cold blood. The belief that this poster exemplifies--this article--was the beating heart of that regime. Don't we want that fact to be crystal clear?

2880:

Why is there no mention of white supremacy in the Middle East? Several middle eastern/North African countries such as Mauratania and Libya have major racial issues and a caste system that places black at the bottom and white on top.

321:. In point of fact, this article has been on my watchlist, along with similar pages, for quite a while.You guys getting the idea of why this "expert" is a timesink? I would suggest that no other responses be made to his comments. 211:

Now he's "the opposition", but he should be informed that he's not going to be allowed to become another timesink, and that at the first sign of disruption, his name will most certainly come up on the Administrators' noticeboards.

2650:

The image may be considered offensive, but I imagine that any historical image attempting to convey the concept of "white supremacy" would be as well. There is no gore, no acute suffering, no atrocity. It seems that it adheres to

432:

Here is what I think the opening sentence should read for the "White supremacy" article: White supremacy or white supremacism is a racial supremacist belief which maintains that white people are superior to people of other races.

2223:

Davefelmer appears to be worried about the equation of white supremacists and Nazis, because the two are not exactly the same thing. But Professor Leslie Madsen-Brooks makes the connection explicit in the cited article from

527:

In case it's not clear, the lead section is a summary of the body of the article, and statements in the lede are not required to be specifically sourced, as long as they are properly sourced in the body of the article. See

2234:

by Pengortm correctly removes the unreferenced stuff about far-right ideologies and white supremacists, even though it inserts the word "always" which is not supported. I would fix the problem by removing "had always".

2930: 1242:

that support the change you want to be made. That is not a conclusion Knowledge should be arriving at. However, if independent news sources make the connection, then we can integrate what those sources say.

1136:, I have neither the patience nor the attention span to read the entire analysis and modify the related Knowledge article accordingly. It just goes on and on and on forever. This could be noteworthy on the 846:

Also because the article is locked down (and I have no objection it seems to be obviously needed) could someone assist me by putting the appropriate Merge-From tag on the page for this discussion? Thanks!

1160:

supremacist narratives in school curricula and some analysis from critical race theory scholars. I have a more detailed outline of the information I can pull from on my user page. Does this sound good? --

2108:

I noticed the revised comment in the sentence about Captain America and Nazis in the 'effect of the media' section has been reverted back with a request to bring the talk discussion between myself and

1326:

Drabble, J. (2007). From White Supremacy to White Power: The FBI, COINTELPRO-WHITE HATE, and the Nazif¡cation of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1970s. American Studies, 48(3), 49-74. doi:10.2307/40644149 (

2132:

ideologies including white supremacists and Nazis in the comics, and was created by Jewish cartoonists." This most accurately addresses the comparison itself as well as the character's comics run.

1354:

Reid, S., & Valasik, M. (2020). THE DILEMMA OF DEFINITIONS AND CATEGORIZATIONS. In Alt-Right Gangs: A Hazy Shade of White (pp. 14-30). Oakland, California: University of California Press.

1043: 820:

term that white supremacists use be merged to this article. There's really no need to have a giant list of white separatists as if they weren't already all noted as white supremacists such as

2785:

room for interpretation in matters like this. I would suggest that we now take a step back and wait for others to chime in and hopefully resolve the issue one way or the other. Best wishes,

664:

Just because reliable sources say something doesn't mean we have to. Describing something that is by definition racist as 'racist' is completely redundant and adds nothing to the article.

1589:

would seem better supported by the sourced text in the article at present. Again, I don't doubt that "wealth" and "purpose" could be sourced, but I don't see them sourced at the moment.

2040:. Actual white supremacists are quite rare, fringe, and powerless in this century, despite what you may have heard from the left-wing media or blue check mark celebrities on Twitter. 1636:

The article almost entirely mentions groups, events and people who are approx. 100 years or more old. Also, the list of "White Separatists" are not necessarily "White Supremacists".

426:

From "White supremacy": White supremacy or white supremacism is the racist belief that white people are superior to people of other races and therefore should be dominant over them.

2403: 2086: 753:

The existence of this thread is clear evidence that explicit mention is needed, not to mention that omission of the essential concept behind white supremacy is just plain bizarre.

2201:

has no further questions, I suggest that Pengortm please revert the version back to the agreed one unless you have any further questions. Otherwise I would be happy to do so.

581: 2355:

Saying " is White Supremacy" implies that is an area where whites are superior. "White supremacism" only implies that there are people who believe in white supremacy in .

1376:

Shanks-Meile, S. L., Dobratz, B. A. (2000). The White Separatist Movement in the United States: "White Power, White Pride!". United Kingdom: Johns Hopkins University Press.

1296:

Burley, S., & Ross, A. (2019). From Nativism to White Power: Mid-Twentieth-Century White Supremacist Movements in Oregon. Oregon Historical Quarterly, 120(4), 564-587.

1644:

that are current, yet again I'm only seeing a few names here that haven't been deceased for decades, and of even those names - most are seperatists and not supremacists.

267:

From what I know of Knowledge rules, the talk area is the place to debate and discuss. Please abide by Knowledge rules and try not to cut me off because I am an expert.

2805:

No Nazi poster, please. The topic is larger than that. Let's not lead the reader to think the topic is primarily about Germany during two decades of the last century.

429:

From "Black supremacy": Black supremacy or black supremacism is a racial supremacist belief which maintains that black people are superior to people of other races.

1667:

requires that we be cautious - we can only mention them here if the sourcing is very high-quality. We'd also want to avoid having this become a dumping ground for

2720:

Since the image in question is clearly shocking in the way it seeks to depict people of African descent as subhuman, it violates this second stipulation as well.

2228:. Madsen-Brooks points out the irony of white supremacists adopting a superhero who fought Nazis, because white supremacists are considered the modern Nazis. 916: 2407: 1371:

Simi, P. & Futrell, R. (2015) American swastika: Inside the white power movement's hidden spaces of hate (second edition). Rowman & Littlefield.

616:(my bold) and is by definition racist, so we don't need to be told so. Also, calling white supremacy racist, but not black supremacy, is itself racist. 1823: 2942: 2121: 964: 2718:

Lead images should be of least shock value; an alternative image that accurately represents the topic without shock value should always be preferred.

1600: 955: 2263:

Thank you for the collegial discussion and bringing this to the talk page. I also agree with removing "had always". I'll go do this momentarily. -

1663:

Well, older stuff has more coverage, and is generally less controversial, so it's easier to write about it. And when dealing with living people

2381:

I guess Donald Trump paid Knowledge alot of moneey to remove his name from this article since he is a well known supporter of white supremacy

1431:

I have added a section on school curriculum in the U.S. if anyone wants to/is willing to take a look--I am wondering if I should expand more?

2733:

only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available.

2320: 1866: 1832: 497: 2776:

I see where you're coming from, Sweetstache, but I'm still not convinced that the image has an overriding encyclopedic value here –– or at

894: 854: 831: 1291:

Belew, K. (2018) Bring the war home: The white power movement and paramilitary America. Harvard University Press. (already cited in text).

97:

How exactly was moving the images their corresponding part of the text "a very poor layout"? And why exactly was the other edit reverted?

2550:

the arrival of the White Supremacists at Plymouth, MA in 1620, the establishment of Jamestown in 1607, the Conquest of Mexico, etcetera.

2882: 2468: 2423: 2388: 2362: 1524: 960: 2896:

The answer is, because no one made the effort to summarize the existing literature on that point! You can be the first if you want. --

2643:: "Image did not belong in the lead. I am not sure it belongs anywhere in the article either, per MOS:IMAGE. What does it illustrate?" 1992: 2551: 2288: 2070: 437: 191:

is the guiding principle here. The credentials of the editor don't matter; the credentials (i.e., the reliability) of the source do. —

1047: 2845: 1993:"Make America Great again: Donald Trump, Racist Nativism and the Virulent Adherence to White Supremecy Amid U.S. Demographic Change" 241:

you seem a bit confused. This is an encyclopaedia and certainly not a place for the sort of debate you seem to be thinking about.

1451:

so it doesn’t seem like you’re coming to a particular conclusion in an effort to persuade the audience one way or another here.

554:

Is it really appropriate to call White Power racist while leaving Black Power untouched? I say no. Some double standard stuff.

2055: 1065:

it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a

569: 1884:"It's okay to be White: laundering White supremacy through a colorblind victimized White race-consciousness raising campaign" 821: 84: 72: 67: 59: 1471:

the biggest suggestion I have for you si the Critical Race Theory thing, especially as the topic is gaining in popularity.

809:

weight by representing her lone writings as being "Other scholars have argued that" which creates a false-balance fallacy.

917:

https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.lib.uh.edu/stable/2568417?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=2#metadata_info_tab_contents

908: 2697:

Thanks, Sweetstache, for launching this discussion. For reference, this is the Nazi propaganda poster under discussion:

2586: 1594: 1541: 1565:, could you point me to the text in the body that this summarizes? I'm afraid I don't quite see it. The claims about 2122:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/college/2016/11/23/the-difference-between-alt-right-and-neo-nazi-explained/37424923/

1239: 1145: 1133: 1066: 38: 2790: 2740: 2723:

2) The argument against inclusion at all is more subjective, but I would argue that it does in fact run afoul of

992: 1940: 2324: 898: 858: 835: 501: 2700:

There are two issues here: 1) Does this image belong in the lead, and 2) does it belong in the article at all.

1344:

Kapan, J. (ed.) (2000). Encyclopedia of white power: A sourcebook on the radical racist right. Altamira Press.

2729:

Avoid images that contain irrelevant or extraneous elements that might seem offensive or harassing to readers

2427: 2082: 1528: 2886: 2579: 2555: 2524: 2472: 2392: 2366: 2292: 1590: 1190: 1017: 537: 470: 441: 394: 326: 217: 188: 1640:

never said even one word about superiority. This is very misleading and is 2 entirely different subjects.

1562: 656: 601: 300: 272: 166: 139: 2679:

section as it's a specific illustration of white supremacy in that country in the described time period.

816:

be redirected here, and that a small subsection for the very minimal definition of white separatism as a

2841: 2810: 2767: 2687: 2662: 2450: 2240: 2155: 1786:"Understanding how hatred persists: situating digital harassment in the long history of white supremacy" 1619: 1436: 1165: 1141: 1103: 973: 882: 247: 296: 268: 236: 178: 162: 638: 635: 2833: 2786: 2781: 2751: 2736: 2710:

and not having a lead image may be the best solution if there is no easy representation of the topic.

2665:

doesn't apply as the article is about a belief regarding an ethnic group/race, not the group itself.

2630: 2494: 2419: 2384: 2358: 2316: 2254: 2250: 2206: 2202: 2140: 2136: 2089:

until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

2043: 1414: 1395:

This is useful, thanks! I've adjusted some of the formatting and added some links for easier access.

1385: 1270: 1220: 988: 850: 827: 762: 717: 557: 314: 47: 17: 2675:

I still think it's fit for the lead. If that view isn't shared, I propose that we include it in the

2047: 1649: 951:"White Supremacists Have Weaponized an Imaginary Viking Past. It's Time to Reclaim the Real History" 561: 2604: 2574: 2264: 2196: 2171: 2051: 2029: 1653: 1114: 932: 565: 310: 2150:

Sure, that'll work. Thanks for keeping the word Nazis with regard to Captain America's opponents.

1097:'s ideas seem fairly fringe, and I wonder if we are putting too much emphasis on him as a source. 2950: 2921:

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between

2340: 2268: 2129: 2094: 1729:"More in common: the domestication of misogynist white supremacy and the assassination of Jo Cox" 1585:

White supremacy denotes a view favoring the maintenance and defense of white power and privilege.

1520: 1400: 1118: 936: 744: 688: 669: 621: 533: 529: 322: 295:

Beyond My Ken, why are you stalking me? I would like responsible authorities to screw this guy.

213: 120: 102: 2698: 1216: 996: 2901: 2861: 2777: 2758: 2037: 1903: 1863: 1829: 1805: 1748: 1710: 1476: 1456: 1305: 1273: 640: 585: 123: 1614:

Don't let me stop you from improving the summary, making it better reflect the article body.

1071: 950: 2837: 2821: 2806: 2763: 2683: 2669: 2445: 2236: 2188: 2151: 2111: 1895: 1855: 1797: 1740: 1702: 1615: 1556: 1498: 1490: 1432: 1355: 1315: 1297: 1279: 1250: 1161: 1098: 1075: 968: 878: 817: 813: 801: 797: 790: 518: 361: 242: 198: 1690: 2827: 2676: 2528: 2488: 2464: 1765:

de Gibert, Ona; Perez, Naiara; García-Pablos, Aitor; Cuadros, Montse (12 September 2018).

1516: 1512: 1410: 1381: 1349:

Landeu, E (1993). The white power movement: America's racist hate groups. Millbrook Press.

1194: 1137: 1021: 806: 756: 711: 680: 474: 398: 1550:"Its purpose is the maintenance and defense of a system of wealth, power, and privilege" 2934: 2703:

1) In my view the argument against inclusion in the lead is more clearly self-evident.

2592: 2280: 2025: 1094: 420:

and both should reflect this neutrally and equally in tone in their opening sentences.

2954: 2905: 2890: 2865: 2849: 2814: 2794: 2771: 2744: 2691: 2609: 2559: 2502: 2476: 2453: 2431: 2411: 2396: 2370: 2344: 2328: 2296: 2272: 2258: 2244: 2210: 2159: 2144: 2098: 2059: 1657: 1623: 1606: 1532: 1502: 1480: 1460: 1440: 1418: 1404: 1389: 1254: 1224: 1169: 1149: 1122: 1106: 1082: 1051: 976: 963:

I'm not sure how relevant this book is here, it obviously has a use in other articles:

940: 909:

https://academic.oup.com/sf/article-abstract/77/3/1221/2234134?redirectedFrom=fulltext

902: 886: 862: 839: 770: 748: 725: 692: 673: 659: 625: 604: 573: 541: 522: 505: 445: 365: 330: 304: 276: 250: 221: 202: 170: 142: 106: 2946: 2704: 2336: 2284: 2090: 1691:"White supremacy, white counter-revolutionary politics, and the rise of Donald Trump" 1664: 1396: 1276: 1267: 740: 684: 665: 617: 318: 98: 2897: 2857: 2313:

Can it be included that black people view USA laws as central to white supremacy?

1472: 1452: 1301: 1113:

points in question, than I would support reconsideration and a change in emphasis.-

209: 184: 1899: 1801: 1744: 956:"Vikings were never the pure-bred master race white supremacists like to portray" 2917: 1883: 1859: 1785: 1728: 1494: 1319: 1282: 1245: 1070: 513: 357: 317:

to understand why accusing me of "stalking" you without evidence is, in fact, a

193: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2402:

You will need to use a reliable source in order to add your requested content.

1851:

Covert Hate Speech: White Nationalists and Dog Whistle Communication on Twitter

2087:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 18#Human Genetic Branching

2033: 2021: 1849: 2438:"From memes to race war: How extremists use popular culture to lure recruits" 1921: 1906: 1808: 1751: 1713: 1706: 1337: 2724: 2656: 2652: 2621: 1363: 1129:

I found an extremely long article that could benefit this Knowledge article.

1967:"President Trump and Charlottesville: Uncivil Mourning and White Supremacy" 1359: 2830:

section, and limiting its context/influence to that part of the article?

2193:

can confirm that he's still happy with the phrasing we agreed on, and if

1215:

Add Donald Trump due to his clear signaling of support for those groups.

187:, so another editor (not I) removed them from the article. Remember that 2077: 1327: 2712:

The image in question does not illustrate the topic of white supremacy

2249:

Fine. Considering the above, I too would accept removing "had always".

2620:

Recently added a WW2-era poster as lead image, it was reverted citing

2624:. My (paraphrased) response on the reverting editor's talk page was: 1155:

New Child Article: White Supremacy in United States School Curriculum

1766: 496:

collective and individual level. " provides no immediate sources.

1941:"Trump, the KKK, and the Versatility of White Supremacy Rhetoric" 2463:

Why are there scare quotes around " 'races' " in the intro when

2279:

Captain America was born of Irish parents and was therefore an

511:

Correct. The sources are provided in the body of the article. —

2735:

In this case, I would argue, none of these conditions is met.

2512: 1178: 1005: 458: 382: 25: 1508:

Addition to See Also section to link with Christian Identity.

967:

The articles above though seem relevant here and elsewhere.

2309:

Black people think of white supremacy as including USA laws

961:"White Supremacy’s Old Gods: The Far Right and Neopaganism" 2351:

Should be "White supremacism" instead of "White supremacy"

2116:

about it onto this page. Therefore, I am doing so below:

1854:. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 151–172. 611:

White supremacy or white supremacism is the belief that

2639: 2483: 2231: 706: 1822:

Kindinger, Evangelia; Schmitt, Mark (4 January 2019).

2912:

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

2780:

for that matter. Regarding the latter, be aware that

2081:

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

2020:

21st-century white supremacists would be people like

1573:

do not seem supported by the cited text in the body.

1784:

Mott, Carrie; Cockayne, Daniel (11 September 2020).

1519:as it is the same & a direct opposite group to 1140:article too since he is mentioned in the analysis. 965:"The Invention of Race in the European Middle Ages" 313:to understand what article talk pages are for, and 2876:White supremacy outside Europe and the anglosphere 1767:"Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forum" 613:white people are superior to people of other races 1042:Remove this outlandish claim its not verifiable. 1175:Semi-protected edit request on 30 September 2020 796:I have been trying to update the sparse article 2485:, with no clear explanation. I'll remove them. 2467:(if I understand it correctly) forbids them? - 2024:(yeah, looks like he's nearing 100 years old), 634:say, not our own opinions. Also, equine abuse 349:Semi-protected edit request on 28 December 2018 183:The edits you made were not backed up with any 1695:Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 2482:It appears to have been added with this edit 455:Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2019 8: 2727:, particularly the part which enjoins us to 926:White Supremacy origins in Scientific Racism 739:something everyone knows is racist as such. 2509:Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2021 2028:(younger, Millennial version), groups like 1922:"Twitter and White Supremacy: A Love Story" 1523:sharing the same belief system/ structure. 1515:should be included in "See Also" following 1002:Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2020 2778:Holocaust victims#Additional Non-Europeans 2759:Holocaust victims#Additional Non-Europeans 2417: 2382: 2356: 2314: 2104:Captain America vs alt-right/Nazis comment 1338:http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1ffjrmp.8 848: 825: 555: 372:The following discussion has been closed. 352: 149:The following discussion has been closed. 115: 2943:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 423:Here are the raw sentences in question: 2941:Above undated message substituted from 1681: 2732: 2728: 2717: 2708: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 610: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1848:Bhat, Prashanth; Klein, Ofra (2020). 1261:Adding info on "White power" movement 1044:2600:1700:521:2350:2848:CD7:9DAD:2140 7: 2069:"Human Genetic Branching" listed at 1882:Brooks, Marcus A. (31 August 2020). 1581:do seem supported. A sentence like: 580:False parallelism and edit warring ( 2416:this is what trolling looks like. 1920:Daniels, Jessie (19 October 2017). 2926: 2922: 2335:All we need is a reliable source. 630:No, but regardless, we go by what 436:Thank you for your consideration. 24: 1727:Jones, Hannah (26 October 2019). 2929:. Further details are available 2916: 2565: 2516: 2404:2600:1012:B12D:1903:0:7:2DDE:201 2076: 1974:Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric 1948:Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric 1230: 1182: 1057: 1009: 869: 462: 386: 29: 2085:. The discussion will occur at 1427:United States school curriculum 946:White supremacy and the Vikings 2377:Why no mention of Donald Trump 1825:The Intersections of Whiteness 1302:10.5403/oregonhistq.120.4.0564 1255:16:53, 30 September 2020 (UTC) 1225:16:34, 30 September 2020 (UTC) 1170:04:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC) 1150:19:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC) 822:David Lane (white supremacist) 1: 2906:19:53, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 2891:16:26, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 2866:12:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC) 2850:02:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC) 2826:Thoughts on adding it to the 2815:01:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC) 2795:01:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC) 2772:01:18, 12 November 2021 (UTC) 2745:00:56, 12 November 2021 (UTC) 2692:00:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC) 2297:22:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 2160:19:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 2145:19:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 1991:Huber, Lindsay Perez (2016). 1939:Sanchez, James Chase (2018). 1900:10.1080/02732173.2020.1812456 1802:10.1080/0966369X.2020.1816920 1745:10.1080/01419870.2019.1577474 1624:16:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 1607:06:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC) 1533:09:52, 20 November 2020 (UTC) 708:, to the surprise of nobody. 446:07:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC) 366:07:31, 28 December 2018 (UTC) 2955:12:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 2371:20:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC) 2345:18:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC) 2329:18:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC) 2273:00:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC) 2259:22:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC) 2245:18:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC) 2211:14:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC) 2099:04:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC) 1658:12:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC) 1503:02:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC) 1481:00:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC) 1461:00:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC) 1441:08:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC) 1419:22:16, 12 October 2020 (UTC) 2543:to reactivate your request. 2531:has been answered. Set the 2060:11:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 1860:10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_7 1790:Gender, Place & Culture 1632:Recent cases/ supremacists? 1542:American Society of Muslims 1405:22:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC) 1390:22:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC) 1320:10.7765/9781526147080.00020 1209:to reactivate your request. 1197:has been answered. Set the 1036:to reactivate your request. 1024:has been answered. Set the 812:I propose that the article 705:DFTT, OP indeffed for this 542:03:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC) 523:21:28, 4 January 2019 (UTC) 506:21:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC) 489:to reactivate your request. 477:has been answered. Set the 413:to reactivate your request. 401:has been answered. Set the 107:09:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC) 2971: 2397:11:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC) 977:18:46, 13 April 2019 (UTC) 903:14:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC) 887:16:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC) 863:13:08, 28 March 2019 (UTC) 840:13:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC) 331:02:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC) 305:02:02, 29 March 2018 (UTC) 277:01:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC) 251:20:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 222:19:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 203:19:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 171:19:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 143:02:35, 29 March 2018 (UTC) 2610:02:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 2560:00:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC) 1926:Publications and Research 1733:Ethnic and Racial Studies 1123:22:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC) 1107:11:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC) 1083:16:08, 23 June 2020 (UTC) 1052:16:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC) 997:19:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 982:GamerKiller2347's Apology 941:12:51, 9 April 2019 (UTC) 771:02:03, 8 March 2019 (UTC) 749:01:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC) 726:01:38, 8 March 2019 (UTC) 693:01:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC) 674:01:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC) 660:05:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC) 626:04:45, 7 March 2019 (UTC) 609:No it isn't appropriate. 605:04:39, 7 March 2019 (UTC) 574:04:37, 7 March 2019 (UTC) 2503:02:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC) 2477:02:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC) 2071:Redirects for discussion 1707:10.1177/2399654418789949 1545:equality and acceptance. 1486:Comments on recent edits 375:Please do not modify it. 152:Please do not modify it. 2454:15:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 2432:18:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC) 2412:01:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC) 2083:Human Genetic Branching 1689:Inwood, Joshua (2020). 1093:It may be just me, but 981: 800:but it appears to be a 1965:Perry, Samuel (2018). 1563:Special:Diff/996929463 1360:10.2307/j.ctv153k67v.6 2933:. Student editor(s): 2663:MOS:NOETHNICGALLERIES 2032:, and Web sites like 1997:Charleston Law Review 1888:Sociological Spectrum 789:Merger Proposal from 42:of past discussions. 2577:for this alteration 1871:– via Springer Link. 112:Who are our posters? 18:Talk:White supremacy 2587:edit semi-protected 2573:please establish a 2135:What do you think? 2030:Atomwaffen Division 1837:– via Google Books. 2931:on the course page 1591:AleatoryPonderings 1521:Christian Identity 1079: 356:same old same old 2836:comment added by 2608: 2571:Not done for now: 2547: 2546: 2499: 2434: 2422:comment added by 2399: 2387:comment added by 2373: 2361:comment added by 2331: 2319:comment added by 2232:This trimming job 2046:comment added by 2038:The Daily Stormer 1868:978-3-030-41421-4 1834:978-1-351-11277-2 1771:arXiv:1809.04444 1739:(14): 2431–2449. 1213: 1212: 1077: 1040: 1039: 865: 853:comment added by 842: 830:comment added by 767: 722: 681:also wasting time 576: 560:comment added by 493: 492: 452: 451: 417: 416: 346: 345: 90: 89: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2962: 2957: 2928: 2927:14 December 2018 2924: 2920: 2852: 2825: 2755: 2670:MOS:IMAGEQUALITY 2642: 2640:your recent edit 2637:Here to discuss 2634: 2602: 2595: 2590: 2569: 2568: 2538: 2534: 2520: 2519: 2513: 2500: 2497: 2493: 2491: 2448: 2200: 2192: 2175: 2115: 2080: 2062: 2005: 2004: 1988: 1982: 1981: 1971: 1962: 1956: 1955: 1945: 1936: 1930: 1929: 1917: 1911: 1910: 1879: 1873: 1872: 1845: 1839: 1838: 1819: 1813: 1812: 1781: 1775: 1774: 1762: 1756: 1755: 1724: 1718: 1717: 1686: 1560: 1240:reliable sources 1234: 1233: 1204: 1200: 1186: 1185: 1179: 1142:MarioSuperstar77 1101: 1080: 1073: 1069:if appropriate. 1061: 1060: 1031: 1027: 1013: 1012: 1006: 971: 877: 873: 872: 814:White separatism 798:White separatism 791:White separatism 768: 765: 761: 759: 723: 720: 716: 714: 653: 650: 647: 644: 632:reliable sources 598: 595: 592: 589: 484: 480: 466: 465: 459: 408: 404: 390: 389: 383: 377: 353: 245: 240: 189:WP:Verifiability 185:reliable sources 182: 154: 136: 133: 130: 127: 116: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2970: 2969: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2940: 2914: 2878: 2831: 2828:History:Germany 2819: 2787:Generalrelative 2752:Generalrelative 2749: 2737:Generalrelative 2677:History:Germany 2638: 2631:Generalrelative 2628: 2618: 2593: 2584: 2566: 2536: 2532: 2529:White supremacy 2517: 2511: 2495: 2489: 2487: 2465:MOS:SCAREQUOTES 2461: 2446: 2440: 2379: 2353: 2321:104.235.133.211 2311: 2226:Idaho Statesman 2194: 2186: 2169: 2168:As you can see 2109: 2106: 2097: 2074: 2041: 2010: 2009: 2008: 1990: 1989: 1985: 1969: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1943: 1938: 1937: 1933: 1919: 1918: 1914: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1869: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1835: 1821: 1820: 1816: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1764: 1763: 1759: 1726: 1725: 1721: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1641: 1634: 1554: 1552: 1517:Black Supremacy 1513:Nation of Islam 1510: 1488: 1468: 1448: 1429: 1409:Great, thanks. 1271:GamerKiller2347 1263: 1238:please provide 1231: 1202: 1198: 1195:White supremacy 1183: 1177: 1157: 1138:Richard Spencer 1134:Here's the link 1131: 1099: 1091: 1076: 1067:reliable source 1058: 1029: 1025: 1022:White supremacy 1010: 1004: 989:GamerKiller2347 984: 969: 948: 928: 870: 868: 794: 763: 757: 755: 718: 712: 710: 651: 648: 645: 642: 596: 593: 590: 587: 552: 498:186.177.165.108 482: 478: 475:White supremacy 463: 457: 406: 402: 399:White supremacy 387: 373: 351: 319:personal attack 243: 234: 176: 150: 134: 131: 128: 125: 114: 95: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2968: 2966: 2923:1 October 2018 2913: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2877: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2721: 2701: 2617: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2545: 2544: 2521: 2510: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2460: 2457: 2439: 2436: 2378: 2375: 2352: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2310: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2281:Irish-American 2277: 2276: 2275: 2229: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2163: 2162: 2105: 2102: 2093: 2073: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2026:Robert Spencer 2007: 2006: 1983: 1957: 1931: 1912: 1874: 1867: 1840: 1833: 1814: 1776: 1757: 1719: 1701:(4): 579–596. 1680: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1638: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1587: 1586: 1551: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1509: 1506: 1487: 1484: 1467: 1464: 1447: 1444: 1428: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1367: 1351: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1332: 1331: 1323: 1322: 1310: 1309: 1293: 1292: 1262: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1211: 1210: 1187: 1176: 1173: 1156: 1153: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1095:John McWhorter 1090: 1089:John McWhorter 1087: 1086: 1085: 1038: 1037: 1014: 1003: 1000: 983: 980: 947: 944: 927: 924: 923: 922: 914: 895:208.84.155.212 890: 889: 866: 855:208.84.155.212 832:208.84.155.212 793: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 551: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 491: 490: 467: 456: 453: 450: 449: 415: 414: 391: 379: 378: 369: 368: 350: 347: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 227: 226: 225: 224: 156: 155: 146: 145: 113: 110: 94: 93:Reverted edits 91: 88: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2967: 2958: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2938: 2936: 2932: 2919: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2883:108.208.70.47 2875: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2854: 2853: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2829: 2823: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2803: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2783: 2782:WP:OTHERSTUFF 2779: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2760: 2753: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2706: 2705:MOS:LEADIMAGE 2702: 2699: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2680: 2678: 2673: 2671: 2666: 2664: 2660: 2658: 2654: 2648: 2644: 2641: 2635: 2632: 2625: 2623: 2615: 2611: 2606: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2588: 2582: 2581: 2576: 2572: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2542: 2539:parameter to 2530: 2526: 2522: 2515: 2514: 2508: 2504: 2501: 2498: 2492: 2484: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2469:73.195.249.93 2466: 2459:Scare quotes? 2458: 2456: 2455: 2452: 2449: 2444: 2437: 2435: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2424:108.4.245.204 2421: 2414: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2400: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2389:71.254.12.170 2386: 2376: 2374: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2363:76.89.155.131 2360: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2308: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2285:Erin go bragh 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2233: 2230: 2227: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2198: 2190: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2173: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2133: 2131: 2125: 2123: 2117: 2113: 2103: 2101: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2079: 2072: 2068: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1987: 1984: 1979: 1975: 1968: 1961: 1958: 1953: 1949: 1942: 1935: 1932: 1927: 1923: 1916: 1913: 1908: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1878: 1875: 1870: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1852: 1844: 1841: 1836: 1831: 1828:. Routledge. 1827: 1826: 1818: 1815: 1810: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1780: 1777: 1772: 1768: 1761: 1758: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1723: 1720: 1715: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1685: 1682: 1678: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1645: 1637: 1631: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1604: 1603: 1598: 1597: 1592: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1558: 1549: 1543: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1525:82.71.230.181 1522: 1518: 1514: 1507: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1485: 1483: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1466:Peer Review 2 1465: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1445: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1426: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1375: 1374: 1370: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1342: 1339: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1321: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1294: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1284: 1281: 1278: 1275: 1272: 1269: 1268:Beyond My Ken 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1247: 1241: 1237: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1208: 1205:parameter to 1196: 1192: 1188: 1181: 1180: 1174: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1154: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1096: 1088: 1084: 1081: 1074: 1068: 1064: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1035: 1032:parameter to 1023: 1019: 1015: 1008: 1007: 1001: 999: 998: 994: 990: 979: 978: 975: 972: 966: 962: 958: 957: 953: 952: 945: 943: 942: 938: 934: 925: 921: 918: 915: 913: 910: 907: 906: 905: 904: 900: 896: 888: 884: 880: 876: 867: 864: 860: 856: 852: 845: 844: 843: 841: 837: 833: 829: 823: 819: 815: 810: 808: 803: 799: 792: 788: 772: 769: 766: 760: 752: 751: 750: 746: 742: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 724: 721: 715: 707: 704: 694: 690: 686: 682: 677: 676: 675: 671: 667: 663: 662: 661: 658: 655: 654: 639: 636: 633: 629: 628: 627: 623: 619: 615: 614: 608: 607: 606: 603: 600: 599: 583: 579: 578: 577: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 549: 543: 539: 535: 534:Beyond My Ken 531: 526: 525: 524: 520: 516: 515: 510: 509: 508: 507: 503: 499: 488: 485:parameter to 476: 472: 468: 461: 460: 454: 448: 447: 443: 439: 434: 430: 427: 424: 421: 412: 409:parameter to 400: 396: 392: 385: 384: 381: 380: 376: 371: 370: 367: 363: 359: 355: 354: 348: 332: 328: 324: 323:Beyond My Ken 320: 316: 315:WP:HARASSMENT 312: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 278: 274: 270: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 252: 249: 246: 238: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 223: 219: 215: 214:Beyond My Ken 210: 206: 205: 204: 200: 196: 195: 190: 186: 180: 175: 174: 173: 172: 168: 164: 158: 157: 153: 148: 147: 144: 141: 138: 137: 122: 118: 117: 111: 109: 108: 104: 100: 92: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2939: 2915: 2879: 2832:— Preceding 2714:specifically 2713: 2681: 2674: 2667: 2661: 2649: 2645: 2636: 2626: 2619: 2597: 2596: 2578: 2570: 2552:74.76.77.139 2548: 2540: 2525:edit request 2486: 2462: 2441: 2418:— Preceding 2415: 2401: 2383:— Preceding 2380: 2357:— Preceding 2354: 2315:— Preceding 2312: 2289:78.17.21.207 2225: 2134: 2126: 2118: 2107: 2075: 2042:— Preceding 2017: 2000: 1996: 1986: 1977: 1973: 1960: 1951: 1947: 1934: 1925: 1915: 1891: 1887: 1877: 1850: 1843: 1824: 1817: 1793: 1789: 1779: 1770: 1760: 1736: 1732: 1722: 1698: 1694: 1684: 1676: 1668: 1646: 1642: 1635: 1601: 1595: 1588: 1553: 1511: 1489: 1469: 1449: 1430: 1379: 1286: 1274:EvergreenFir 1264: 1244: 1235: 1214: 1206: 1191:edit request 1158: 1132: 1092: 1062: 1041: 1033: 1018:edit request 985: 959: 954: 949: 929: 919: 911: 891: 874: 849:— Preceding 826:— Preceding 811: 795: 754: 709: 641: 631: 612: 586: 556:— Preceding 553: 512: 494: 486: 471:edit request 438:73.254.77.17 435: 431: 428: 425: 422: 418: 410: 395:edit request 374: 311:WP:NOTAFORUM 309:Please read 297:Music man214 269:Music man214 237:Music man214 192: 179:Music man214 163:Music man214 159: 151: 124: 96: 78: 43: 37: 2838:Sweetstache 2822:Binksternet 2807:Binksternet 2764:Sweetstache 2684:Sweetstache 2598:Ganbaruby! 2447:Doug Weller 2237:Binksternet 2189:Binksternet 2152:Binksternet 2112:Binksternet 1894:(0): 1–17. 1796:(0): 1–20. 1616:Binksternet 1557:Binksternet 1491:MBJAnderson 1446:Peer Review 1433:MBJAnderson 1280:Doug Weller 1162:MBJAnderson 1100:Doug Weller 970:Doug Weller 879:Richard3120 530:WP:CITELEAD 244:Doug Weller 121:not a forum 36:This is an 2682:Thoughts? 2616:Lead image 2591:template. 2583:using the 2533:|answered= 2490:Acroterion 2251:Davefelmer 2203:Davefelmer 2137:Davefelmer 2034:Stormfront 2022:David Duke 1677:References 1411:Shameran81 1382:Shameran81 1199:|answered= 1026:|answered= 758:Acroterion 713:Acroterion 479:|answered= 403:|answered= 2935:Khajehmal 2725:MOS:OMIMG 2657:MOS:OMIMG 2653:MOS:SHOCK 2622:MOS:IMAGE 2575:consensus 2130:far-right 2048:McCoySWAT 1907:0273-2173 1809:0966-369X 1752:0141-9870 1714:2399-6544 1650:Yashamaga 1236:Not done: 1063:Not done: 824:either. 818:WP:WEASEL 802:WP:FRINGE 562:Ian D 123 85:Archive 6 79:Archive 5 73:Archive 4 68:Archive 3 60:Archive 1 2947:PrimeBOT 2846:contribs 2834:unsigned 2707:states: 2420:unsigned 2385:unsigned 2359:unsigned 2337:deisenbe 2317:unsigned 2265:Pengortm 2197:Pengortm 2172:Pengortm 2091:Hog Farm 2056:contribs 2044:unsigned 1669:everyone 1575:rivilege 1397:Grayfell 1277:Grayfell 1115:Pengortm 933:Othelllo 851:unsigned 828:unsigned 807:WP:UNDUE 741:Adam9007 685:Grayfell 666:Adam9007 618:Adam9007 582:reported 570:contribs 558:unsigned 550:"Racist" 119:This is 99:Kiwifist 2898:Mvbaron 2858:Rsk6400 2668:As for 1567:purpose 1473:AHall08 1453:AHall08 1287:Works: 39:archive 2580:before 2496:(talk) 2018:actual 2003:: 215. 1665:WP:BLP 1571:wealth 1495:19jshi 1380:Best, 1283:Jmabel 1246:C.Fred 1072:Ed6767 764:(talk) 719:(talk) 657:(talk) 602:(talk) 514:C.Fred 358:Edaham 194:C.Fred 140:(talk) 2537:|ans= 2523:This 1970:(PDF) 1944:(PDF) 1579:power 1364:JSTOR 1328:JSTOR 1306:JSTOR 1217:ERMOS 1203:|ans= 1189:This 1078:talk! 1030:|ans= 1016:This 483:|ans= 469:This 407:|ans= 393:This 16:< 2951:talk 2925:and 2902:talk 2887:talk 2862:talk 2842:talk 2811:talk 2791:talk 2768:talk 2741:talk 2688:talk 2655:and 2605:talk 2556:talk 2473:talk 2451:talk 2442:See 2428:talk 2408:talk 2393:talk 2367:talk 2341:talk 2325:talk 2293:talk 2269:talk 2255:talk 2241:talk 2207:talk 2156:talk 2141:talk 2095:Talk 2052:talk 2036:and 1904:ISSN 1864:ISBN 1830:ISBN 1806:ISSN 1749:ISSN 1711:ISSN 1654:talk 1620:talk 1577:and 1569:and 1561:Per 1529:talk 1499:talk 1477:talk 1457:talk 1437:talk 1415:talk 1401:talk 1386:talk 1251:talk 1221:talk 1166:talk 1146:talk 1119:talk 1104:talk 1048:talk 993:talk 974:talk 937:talk 899:talk 883:talk 875:Done 859:talk 836:talk 745:talk 689:talk 670:talk 622:talk 584:... 566:talk 538:talk 519:talk 502:talk 442:talk 362:talk 327:talk 301:talk 273:talk 248:talk 218:talk 199:talk 167:talk 103:talk 2945:by 2627:Hi 2535:or 2527:to 2185:If 1896:doi 1856:doi 1798:doi 1741:doi 1703:doi 1602:!!! 1599:) ( 1596:??? 1535:Cd 1356:doi 1316:doi 1298:doi 1201:or 1193:to 1028:or 1020:to 652:Fir 649:een 646:rgr 643:Eve 597:Fir 594:een 591:rgr 588:Eve 481:or 473:to 405:or 397:to 135:Fir 132:een 129:rgr 126:Eve 2953:) 2937:. 2904:) 2889:) 2864:) 2848:) 2844:• 2813:) 2793:) 2770:) 2743:) 2690:) 2659:. 2589:}} 2585:{{ 2558:) 2541:no 2475:) 2430:) 2410:) 2395:) 2369:) 2343:) 2327:) 2295:) 2283:. 2271:) 2257:) 2243:) 2209:) 2158:) 2143:) 2058:) 2054:• 2001:10 1999:. 1995:. 1976:. 1972:. 1950:. 1946:. 1924:. 1902:. 1890:. 1886:. 1862:. 1804:. 1792:. 1788:. 1769:. 1747:. 1737:42 1735:. 1731:. 1709:. 1699:37 1697:. 1693:. 1656:) 1622:) 1605:) 1531:) 1501:) 1479:) 1459:) 1439:) 1417:) 1403:) 1388:) 1253:) 1223:) 1207:no 1168:) 1148:) 1121:) 1050:) 1034:no 995:) 939:) 901:) 885:) 861:) 838:) 747:) 691:) 683:. 672:) 637:, 624:) 572:) 568:• 540:) 532:. 521:) 504:) 487:no 444:) 411:no 364:) 329:) 303:) 275:) 220:) 201:) 169:) 105:) 64:← 2949:( 2900:( 2885:( 2860:( 2840:( 2824:: 2820:@ 2809:( 2789:( 2766:( 2754:: 2750:@ 2739:( 2686:( 2633:: 2629:@ 2607:) 2603:( 2594:◢ 2554:( 2471:( 2426:( 2406:( 2391:( 2365:( 2339:( 2323:( 2291:( 2287:! 2267:( 2253:( 2239:( 2205:( 2199:: 2195:@ 2191:: 2187:@ 2174:: 2170:@ 2154:( 2139:( 2114:: 2110:@ 2050:( 1980:. 1978:8 1954:. 1952:8 1928:. 1909:. 1898:: 1892:0 1858:: 1811:. 1800:: 1794:0 1773:. 1754:. 1743:: 1716:. 1705:: 1652:( 1618:( 1593:( 1559:: 1555:@ 1527:( 1497:( 1475:( 1455:( 1435:( 1413:( 1399:( 1384:( 1366:) 1362:( 1358:: 1330:) 1318:: 1308:) 1304:( 1300:: 1249:( 1243:— 1219:( 1164:( 1144:( 1117:( 1046:( 991:( 935:( 897:( 881:( 857:( 834:( 743:( 687:( 668:( 620:( 564:( 536:( 517:( 500:( 440:( 360:( 325:( 299:( 271:( 239:: 235:@ 216:( 197:( 181:: 177:@ 165:( 101:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index