Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:White privilege

Source đź“ť

495: 474: 360: 689: 668: 882: 505: 937: 287: 317: 600: 579: 443: 917: 387: 759: 2029:
When I was young, in a city where blacks were not allowed in white public schools, the public swimming pool, or on our side of the tracks after sundown; our black maid's skin looked white but was badly scared. This was due to her efforts to bleach her skin white to lift herself out of the situation
1871:
I agree. I think there is enough criticism of white privilege from left-wing and other social justice perspectives to merit its own section here. Adolph L. Reed and Karen and Barbara Fields have established an intellectual tradition that questions the salience of race-centered perspectives divorced
1795:
One thing I think is worth noting is research from Plos one titled, "How the term “white privilege” affects participation, polarization, and content in online communication." The conclusion is "Overall, mention of white privilege seems to create internet discussions that are less constructive, more
1824:
In most cases separate sections devoted to criticism, controversies, or the like should be avoided in an article because these sections call undue attention to negative viewpoints. Articles should present the prevailing viewpoints from reliable sources, whether positive or negative. Segregation of
1913:
It should be noted throughout the article that white privilege is a theory or the opinion of some and not a proven fact. Yes there are countless editorials and opinions about the topic, but very little factual data. For wikipedia to remain true to its mission it shouldn't be pushing one groups
1856:
As Generalrelative points out, Criticism sections are a holdout from Knowledge (XXG)'s cowboy days, where we didn't have as many guidelines. They've fallen out of favor, and any articles that still have them need to be edited for compliance with modern standards. It's just not people's highest
1791:
There isn't a section for criticism of the concept of white privilege. I don't see this in the article history. Am I opening a can of worms by starting a section? If I don't hear back soon, I'll give it a try. Feel free to post feedback here.
1825:
text or other content into different subsections, based solely on the apparent POV of the content itself, may result in an unencyclopedic structure, such as a back-and-forth dialogue between proponents and opponents.
153: 650: 926:
in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Ontario Institute of Technology/Critical Race Theory (Winter 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
412: 1645: 2044:
Not here to dispute the historical mistreatment of black folks. I was hoping that, here in 2024, I might find answers regarding my level of privilege. As someone who may or may not be "of color".
1709: 842: 422: 1997:
At what specific skin tone does it kick in? Or is the privilege graded, with say, an Italian enjoying less of it than an Irishman? Does a black albino person enjoy white privilege?
790: 815: 805: 2062:
and that specific a question is not possible to answer anywhere. If you have a suggestion about an addition; you are welcome to provide reliable sources for that addition.
278: 147: 820: 810: 739: 2114: 640: 2129: 729: 855: 561: 79: 1677:
The previous concern is valid. White privilege is theoretical and should be portrayed as such. This exact article is why I don't use Knowledge (XXG) anymore.
2119: 616: 2134: 337:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. 705: 2104: 800: 551: 2094: 704:, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 324: 2109: 851: 85: 2124: 44: 607: 584: 527: 763: 696: 673: 2000:
Perhaps the article could seek to answer these questions. As an "olive" type with mixed ancestry I'm not quite sure where I stand. Thanks.
1678: 30: 2099: 1915: 1873: 1649: 190: 1713: 899: 518: 479: 340: 328: 99: 1929:
The article is well sourced referencing multiple studies. I see no editorials in the cites. You have provided no contrary studies.
104: 20: 923: 74: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 454: 368: 168: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 135: 65: 1786:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1891:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
393: 1705:"RS" all push the idea of White privilege. Any source pushing back against it will just be discredited as "extremist". 373: 286: 185: 346: 109: 1847: 129: 895: 297: 1902: 1907: 1682: 460: 1919: 1877: 2067: 2049: 2035: 2005: 1934: 1727: 1668: 125: 889: 2020: 1696: 1644:
Whether or not you agree with it's existence, white privilege is an idea. So, we can redefine it as that.
777: 1831: 1818: 903: 55: 615:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
526:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2059: 175: 70: 1843: 1807: 1835: 1610: 442: 386: 334: 1872:
from social class and other forms of oppression, which white privilege scholarship often embraces.
161: 2063: 2045: 2031: 2001: 1972: 1945: 1930: 1859: 1767: 1723: 1664: 1619: 302: 1967: 1614: 2016: 1692: 494: 473: 51: 141: 299: 1830:
With regard to that one study, I'm neutral on inclusion. Generally we prefer to rely upon
1803: 1562: 1549: 1536: 1523: 1510: 1496: 1481: 1466: 1451: 1436: 1421: 1406: 1391: 1376: 1361: 1346: 1331: 1316: 1301: 1286: 1271: 1256: 1242: 1228: 1213: 1198: 1183: 1168: 1153: 1138: 1123: 1108: 1094: 1080: 1065: 1050: 1035: 1020: 1006: 993: 980: 957: 831: 24: 1762: 1660: 1797: 612: 510: 2088: 881: 701: 688: 667: 504: 500: 916: 797:
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
523: 396:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: 349:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
301: 791:
Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
1839: 700:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to 2071: 2053: 2039: 2024: 2009: 1979: 1952: 1938: 1923: 1881: 1866: 1851: 1811: 1774: 1731: 1717: 1700: 1686: 1672: 1653: 1626: 758: 599: 578: 1796:
polarized, and less supportive of racially progressive policies."
894:
If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review
1966:
We are not here to answer questions about the article topic, per
1613:
section. Next time, just remove this kind of post, this is not a
1970:. This is not a place for either homework answers, or debate. — 1757:
This section has been dead for 6 months. If you wish to suggest
825: 931: 911: 876: 436: 381: 354: 311: 303: 15: 1943:
Please see the Archives, this has been discussed to death. —
896:
the relevant Knowledge (XXG) policy on recruitment of editors
1838:
studies, particularly ones in pay-to-publish journals like
1857:
priority to go looking for them on a volunteer project. —
843:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests
1905:
from "White privilege is opinion and not a proven fact".
160: 1798:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067660/
816:
Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment
806:
Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action
611:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 522:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2058:Sorry, much as my response sounded forumy; this is 174: 821:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention 811:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 902:. Disputes on Knowledge (XXG) are resolved by 372:. Please read recent comments and look in the 1822: 787:of articles within the scope of this project. 8: 2015:Do you have any RS that discuss this issue? 1986:The following discussion has been closed. 1962: 1633:The following discussion has been closed. 1605: 954: 943: 801:Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles 747: 662: 625:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Discrimination 573: 468: 397: 714:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ethnic groups 1834:sources wherever possible, rather than 1646:2A02:8084:601D:5880:E544:E554:D87B:2CC7 664: 575: 470: 440: 2115:Mid-importance Discrimination articles 1722:You could say the same about gravity. 1691:So provide some RS that challenge it. 890:recruit editors of specific viewpoints 2130:Mid-importance Ethnic groups articles 1710:2A00:23C7:9183:2601:100:B4FC:2E2E:2BA 751:WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: 536:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology 7: 2095:Knowledge (XXG) controversial topics 1782:The following discussion is closed. 1659:We cannot redefine anything. We use 694:This article is within the scope of 605:This article is within the scope of 516:This article is within the scope of 2120:WikiProject Discrimination articles 1169:Privileges not related to injustice 922:This article was the subject of an 628:Template:WikiProject Discrimination 459:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 2135:WikiProject Ethnic groups articles 1959:If white privilege exists, then... 717:Template:WikiProject Ethnic groups 14: 2105:Mid-importance sociology articles 369:previous arguments being restated 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 1887:The discussion above is closed. 1765:, please start a new section. — 935: 915: 880: 757: 687: 666: 598: 577: 503: 493: 472: 441: 385: 358: 315: 285: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2110:C-Class Discrimination articles 1761:additions to the article, with 1095:Applications in critical theory 734:This article has been rated as 645:This article has been rated as 556:This article has been rated as 392:This article was nominated for 339:Content must be written from a 323:The subject of this article is 2125:C-Class Ethnic groups articles 2030:blacks were forced to endure. 539:Template:WikiProject Sociology 1: 1732:12:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 1718:12:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 1708:This is the problem with WP. 1627:18:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 708:and see a list of open tasks. 619:and see a list of open tasks. 530:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1701:14:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC) 1687:14:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC) 1081:21st-century popular culture 900:neutral point of view policy 888:There have been attempts to 1867:19:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC) 1852:19:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC) 1812:19:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC) 333:When updating the article, 2151: 2100:C-Class sociology articles 2072:00:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC) 2054:00:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC) 2040:14:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC) 2025:14:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC) 2010:14:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC) 1980:12:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC) 1953:12:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC) 1939:11:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC) 1924:11:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC) 1882:20:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1775:16:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC) 1673:01:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC) 1654:00:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC) 740:project's importance scale 608:WikiProject Discrimination 562:project's importance scale 1184:Framing racial inequality 764:WikiProject Ethnic groups 746: 733: 697:WikiProject Ethnic groups 682: 644: 593: 555: 488: 467: 365:Discussions on this page 335:be bold, but not reckless 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1989:Please do not modify it. 1889:Please do not modify it. 1784:Please do not modify it. 1636:Please do not modify it. 1407:Employment and economics 1199:White privilege pedagogy 1051:US civil rights movement 1974:The Hand That Feeds You 1947:The Hand That Feeds You 1861:The Hand That Feeds You 1769:The Hand That Feeds You 1621:The Hand That Feeds You 906:, not by majority vote. 631:Discrimination articles 411:, 16 October 2007, see 1827: 924:educational assignment 720:Ethnic groups articles 449:This article is rated 327:and content may be in 75:avoid personal attacks 519:WikiProject Sociology 453:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 401:Deletion discussions: 341:neutral point of view 279:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 1109:Critical race theory 1066:Study of the concept 1021:European colonialism 421:, 8 March 2005, see 105:No original research 1243:Global perspectives 961: 856:discuss these tasks 762:Here are some open 1785: 1750:Criticisms Section 1124:Whiteness unspoken 1036:Early 20th-century 955: 839:Start an article: 542:sociology articles 455:content assessment 376:before commenting. 371: 86:dispute resolution 47: 2083: 2082: 1906: 1783: 1747: 1746: 1663:for our content. 1594: 1593: 1589: 1588: 1585: 1584: 1139:Unjust enrichment 956:Section size for 930: 929: 910: 909: 898:, as well as the 875: 874: 871: 870: 867: 866: 863: 862: 661: 660: 657: 656: 572: 571: 568: 567: 435: 434: 431: 430: 380: 379: 366: 353: 352: 310: 309: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2142: 1991: 1975: 1963: 1948: 1901: 1896:Opinion vs. fact 1862: 1770: 1763:reliable sources 1661:reliable sources 1638: 1622: 1606: 1499: 1484: 1469: 1454: 1439: 1424: 1409: 1394: 1379: 1364: 1349: 1334: 1319: 1304: 1289: 1274: 1259: 1231: 1216: 1201: 1186: 1171: 1156: 1154:Spared injustice 1141: 1126: 1111: 1083: 1068: 1053: 1038: 1023: 962: 944: 939: 938: 932: 919: 912: 892:to this article. 884: 877: 785:on the talk page 782: 776: 761: 748: 722: 721: 718: 715: 712: 691: 684: 683: 678: 670: 663: 651:importance scale 633: 632: 629: 626: 623: 602: 595: 594: 589: 581: 574: 544: 543: 540: 537: 534: 513: 508: 507: 497: 490: 489: 484: 476: 469: 452: 446: 445: 437: 398: 389: 382: 362: 361: 355: 319: 318: 312: 304: 290: 289: 280: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2150: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2085: 2084: 1987: 1973: 1961: 1946: 1903:Thread retitled 1898: 1893: 1892: 1860: 1844:Generalrelative 1788: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1768: 1752: 1634: 1620: 1604: 1590: 1550:Further reading 1495: 1480: 1465: 1450: 1435: 1420: 1405: 1390: 1375: 1360: 1345: 1330: 1315: 1300: 1285: 1270: 1255: 1227: 1214:White fragility 1212: 1197: 1182: 1167: 1152: 1137: 1122: 1107: 1079: 1064: 1049: 1034: 1019: 958:White privilege 949: 936: 832:Peruvian people 780: 774: 719: 716: 713: 710: 709: 676: 630: 627: 624: 621: 620: 587: 541: 538: 535: 532: 531: 509: 502: 482: 450: 359: 316: 306: 305: 300: 277: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 25:White privilege 12: 11: 5: 2148: 2146: 2138: 2137: 2132: 2127: 2122: 2117: 2112: 2107: 2102: 2097: 2087: 2086: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2027: 1993: 1992: 1983: 1982: 1960: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1941: 1911: 1910: 1908:WP:TALKHEADPOV 1897: 1894: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1869: 1854: 1828: 1789: 1780: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1751: 1748: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1706: 1679:142.177.42.150 1640: 1639: 1630: 1629: 1603: 1600: 1598: 1592: 1591: 1587: 1586: 1583: 1582: 1579: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1568: 1565: 1563:External links 1559: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1546: 1545: 1542: 1539: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1526: 1520: 1519: 1516: 1513: 1507: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1492: 1491: 1488: 1485: 1477: 1476: 1473: 1470: 1462: 1461: 1458: 1455: 1447: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1425: 1417: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1395: 1387: 1386: 1383: 1380: 1372: 1371: 1368: 1365: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1350: 1342: 1341: 1338: 1335: 1327: 1326: 1323: 1320: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1305: 1297: 1296: 1293: 1290: 1282: 1281: 1278: 1275: 1267: 1266: 1263: 1260: 1252: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1232: 1229:White backlash 1224: 1223: 1220: 1217: 1209: 1208: 1205: 1202: 1194: 1193: 1190: 1187: 1179: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1164: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1149: 1148: 1145: 1142: 1134: 1133: 1130: 1127: 1119: 1118: 1115: 1112: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1097: 1091: 1090: 1087: 1084: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1061: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1046: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1031: 1030: 1027: 1024: 1016: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1003: 1002: 999: 996: 990: 989: 986: 983: 977: 976: 974: 971: 969: 966: 960:(41 sections) 951: 950: 947: 942: 940: 928: 927: 920: 908: 907: 885: 873: 872: 869: 868: 865: 864: 861: 860: 852:edit this list 848: 847: 846: 845: 837: 836: 835: 828: 823: 818: 813: 808: 803: 795: 794: 793: 788: 753: 752: 744: 743: 736:Mid-importance 732: 726: 725: 723: 706:the discussion 692: 680: 679: 677:Mid‑importance 671: 659: 658: 655: 654: 647:Mid-importance 643: 637: 636: 634: 622:Discrimination 617:the discussion 613:Discrimination 603: 591: 590: 588:Mid‑importance 585:Discrimination 582: 570: 569: 566: 565: 558:Mid-importance 554: 548: 547: 545: 528:the discussion 515: 514: 511:Society portal 498: 486: 485: 483:Mid‑importance 477: 465: 464: 458: 447: 433: 432: 429: 428: 427: 426: 416: 403: 402: 390: 378: 377: 367:often lead to 363: 351: 350: 320: 308: 307: 298: 296: 295: 292: 291: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2147: 2136: 2133: 2131: 2128: 2126: 2123: 2121: 2118: 2116: 2113: 2111: 2108: 2106: 2103: 2101: 2098: 2096: 2093: 2092: 2090: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2046:Gene Stanley1 2043: 2042: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2028: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2003: 2002:Gene Stanley1 1998: 1995: 1994: 1990: 1985: 1984: 1981: 1978: 1976: 1969: 1965: 1964: 1958: 1954: 1951: 1949: 1942: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1916:146.168.64.10 1909: 1904: 1900: 1899: 1895: 1890: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1874:47.32.112.104 1870: 1868: 1865: 1863: 1855: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1826: 1820: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1800: 1799: 1793: 1787: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1764: 1760: 1749: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1632: 1631: 1628: 1625: 1623: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1607: 1601: 1599: 1596: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1566: 1564: 1561: 1560: 1556: 1553: 1551: 1548: 1547: 1543: 1540: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1514: 1512: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1501: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1486: 1483: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1459: 1456: 1453: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1441: 1438: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1426: 1423: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1411: 1408: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1396: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1381: 1378: 1377:United States 1374: 1373: 1369: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1351: 1348: 1347:North America 1344: 1343: 1339: 1336: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1321: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1276: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1261: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1236: 1233: 1230: 1226: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1195: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1158: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1131: 1128: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1085: 1082: 1078: 1077: 1073: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1055: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1004: 1000: 997: 995: 992: 991: 987: 984: 982: 979: 978: 972: 967: 964: 963: 959: 953: 952: 948:Section sizes 946: 945: 941: 934: 933: 925: 921: 918: 914: 913: 905: 901: 897: 893: 891: 886: 883: 879: 878: 859: 857: 853: 850:Feel free to 844: 841: 840: 838: 834: 833: 829: 827: 824: 822: 819: 817: 814: 812: 809: 807: 804: 802: 799: 798: 796: 792: 789: 786: 779: 778:Ethnic groups 772: 771: 769: 768: 767: 765: 760: 755: 754: 750: 749: 745: 741: 737: 731: 728: 727: 724: 711:Ethnic groups 707: 703: 702:ethnic groups 699: 698: 693: 690: 686: 685: 681: 675: 674:Ethnic groups 672: 669: 665: 652: 648: 642: 639: 638: 635: 618: 614: 610: 609: 604: 601: 597: 596: 592: 586: 583: 580: 576: 563: 559: 553: 550: 549: 546: 529: 525: 521: 520: 512: 506: 501: 499: 496: 492: 491: 487: 481: 478: 475: 471: 466: 462: 456: 448: 444: 439: 438: 424: 420: 417: 414: 410: 407: 406: 405: 404: 400: 399: 395: 391: 388: 384: 383: 375: 370: 364: 357: 356: 348: 344: 342: 336: 332: 330: 326: 325:controversial 321: 314: 313: 294: 293: 288: 284: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2017:Slatersteven 1999: 1996: 1988: 1971: 1944: 1912: 1888: 1858: 1832:WP:SECONDARY 1823: 1819:WP:CRITICISM 1801: 1794: 1790: 1781: 1766: 1758: 1693:Slatersteven 1643: 1635: 1618: 1597: 1595: 1537:Bibliography 1287:South Africa 965:Section name 887: 849: 830: 784: 770:Meta-tasks: 756: 735: 695: 646: 606: 557: 517: 461:WikiProjects 418: 408: 338: 322: 282: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2064:O3000, Ret. 2060:not a forum 2032:O3000, Ret. 1931:O3000, Ret. 1724:O3000, Ret. 1665:O3000, Ret. 1497:New Zealand 1332:South Korea 148:free images 31:not a forum 2089:Categories 1914:ideology. 1836:WP:PRIMARY 1804:MoralMoney 1611:WP:POVPUSH 1602:Redefining 1524:References 994:Definition 773:Place the 423:discussion 413:discussion 1482:Australia 1437:Education 904:consensus 783:template 533:Sociology 524:sociology 480:Sociology 347:citations 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1968:WP:FORUM 1840:PLoS One 1759:specific 1615:WP:FORUM 1609:Closing 1581:134,666 1511:See also 1452:Military 394:deletion 374:archives 345:Include 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1578:134,666 1490:12,465 1475:15,742 1467:Oceania 1445:12,400 1422:Housing 1385:29,732 1355:32,996 1272:Namibia 1250:66,026 1102:21,595 1014:27,059 1007:History 973:Section 766:tasks: 738:on the 649:on the 560:on the 451:C-class 329:dispute 283:90 days 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1570:1,937 1557:4,420 1544:1,588 1505:3,263 1487:12,465 1460:1,153 1442:12,400 1430:3,052 1415:6,689 1400:4,002 1392:Wealth 1370:3,244 1362:Canada 1340:4,984 1325:2,859 1310:7,854 1295:3,097 1280:4,117 1265:7,227 1257:Africa 1237:3,640 1222:4,170 1207:1,590 1192:4,405 1162:1,056 1132:2,357 1117:2,750 1089:4,887 1074:5,209 1059:5,796 1044:4,561 1029:6,594 1001:5,662 988:5,958 975:total 457:scale. 126:Google 1575:Total 1567:1,937 1554:4,420 1541:1,588 1502:3,263 1457:1,153 1427:3,052 1412:6,689 1397:4,002 1382:2,436 1367:3,244 1337:4,984 1322:2,859 1317:Japan 1292:3,097 1277:4,117 1247:2,207 1234:3,640 1219:4,170 1204:1,590 1189:4,405 1159:1,056 1129:2,357 1114:2,750 1086:4,887 1071:5,209 1056:5,796 1041:4,561 1026:6,594 998:5,662 985:5,958 981:(Top) 970:count 191:Index 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2068:talk 2050:talk 2036:talk 2021:talk 2006:talk 1935:talk 1920:talk 1878:talk 1848:talk 1817:See 1808:talk 1728:talk 1714:talk 1697:talk 1683:talk 1669:talk 1650:talk 1617:. — 1518:325 1302:Asia 1177:608 1147:982 968:Byte 826:Iyer 419:Keep 409:Keep 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1531:96 1515:325 1174:608 1144:982 854:or 730:Mid 641:Mid 552:Mid 176:TWL 2091:: 2070:) 2052:) 2038:) 2023:) 2008:) 1937:) 1922:) 1880:) 1850:) 1842:. 1821:: 1810:) 1802:-- 1730:) 1716:) 1699:) 1685:) 1671:) 1652:) 1528:96 1472:14 1352:20 1307:11 1262:13 1099:37 1011:12 858:. 781:}} 775:{{ 281:: 275:21 273:, 271:20 269:, 267:19 265:, 263:18 261:, 259:17 257:, 255:16 253:, 251:15 249:, 247:14 245:, 243:13 241:, 239:12 237:, 235:11 233:, 231:10 229:, 225:, 221:, 217:, 213:, 209:, 205:, 201:, 197:, 193:, 156:) 54:; 2066:( 2048:( 2034:( 2019:( 2004:( 1977:: 1950:: 1933:( 1918:( 1876:( 1864:: 1846:( 1806:( 1772:: 1726:( 1712:( 1695:( 1681:( 1667:( 1648:( 1624:: 742:. 653:. 564:. 463:: 425:. 415:. 343:. 331:. 227:9 223:8 219:7 215:6 211:5 207:4 203:3 199:2 195:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
White privilege
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
Index
1
2
3
4
5

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑