102:
81:
50:
21:
219:
showing third-party sources where the
Society has been mentioned. Unfortunately, since I'm in Germany, I can't view most of the book previews, so I don't know what these books have to say. I do think the Society is notable enough for inclusion, but I'm not sure how to go about proving it.
197:
are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press coverage about the
Society, or books in which the Society is mentioned. The sources may, but need not, be available online; it is however important that they are explicitely cited.
278:
Sinds 1931 bestaat er volledige kerkelijke gemeenschap tussen de Oud - Katholieke Kerk en de kerken van de
Anglicaanse Gemeenschap. De St. Willibrord Vereniging wil deze contacten in binnen- en buitenland verstevigen en uitbreiden."
285:
Ever since 1931 a full ecclesiastical community exists between the Old-Catholic Church and the churches of the
Anglican Communion. The Saint Willibrord Society wants to enhance and expand these contacts in our country and abroad."
242:, and while Bishops of the Anglican and Old Catholic churches play a part in the life of the Society (the Archbishops of Canterbury and of Utrecht are Patrons of the English Willibrord Society), there are no
304:
Reliable, but not independent. To really establish notability, we need to show that the
Willibrord Society has been discussed in print by people other than the Anglican and Old Catholic Churches themselves.
31:
163:
336:
153:
246:
which convey more than a bare minimum of information about the society. There are references to the
Societies' activities in the ecclesiastical press (e.g.
341:
129:
331:
125:
112:
86:
272:
on the website of the
Rotterdam Old Catholic Church mentions the St. Willibrord Vereniging, the dutch name for this society. I quote
243:
194:
61:
27:
294:
67:
49:
259:
101:
80:
20:
290:
254:, but random explicit citations from ephemera are not useful for the majority of readers, surely?
206:
201:
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the
124:. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
121:
238:
While the various
Willibrord Societies are well-enough known to feature, for example, in the
202:
255:
216:
190:
189:
of this organization is currently unclear, since no secondary sources are cited. By the
311:
226:
186:
325:
117:
269:
316:
306:
298:
263:
231:
221:
209:
289:
Perhaps the Dutch internet has more refernces like this. Are these RS? --
116:, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
43:
15:
128:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
8:
75:
47:
240:Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church
30:on 16 October 2008 (UTC). The result of
282:"Contacts old catholics and anglicans
275:"Contact oud-katholieken en anglicanen
138:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Anglicanism
77:
191:notability criteria for organizations
7:
337:Low-importance Anglicanism articles
66:It is of interest to the following
14:
342:Stub-Class Christianity articles
141:Template:WikiProject Anglicanism
100:
79:
48:
19:
332:Stub-Class Anglicanism articles
252:Christkatholisches Kirchenblatt
158:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
1:
317:19:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
299:18:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
264:07:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
244:independent reliable sources
232:17:53, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
195:independent reliable sources
358:
164:project's importance scale
217:some hits at Google Books
157:
95:
74:
210:20:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
113:WikiProject Anglicanism
203:Notability wikiproject
56:This article is rated
60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
144:Anglicanism articles
122:Anglican Communion
108:Willibrord Society
62:content assessment
178:
177:
174:
173:
170:
169:
42:
41:
349:
146:
145:
142:
139:
136:
104:
97:
96:
91:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
357:
356:
352:
351:
350:
348:
347:
346:
322:
321:
270:This Dutch text
183:
143:
140:
137:
134:
133:
89:
57:
12:
11:
5:
355:
353:
345:
344:
339:
334:
324:
323:
320:
319:
291:Paul Pieniezny
267:
266:
235:
234:
182:
179:
176:
175:
172:
171:
168:
167:
160:Low-importance
156:
150:
149:
147:
105:
93:
92:
90:Low‑importance
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
354:
343:
340:
338:
335:
333:
330:
329:
327:
318:
315:
314:
310:
309:
303:
302:
301:
300:
296:
292:
287:
283:
280:
276:
273:
271:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
233:
230:
229:
225:
224:
218:
214:
213:
212:
211:
208:
207:B. Wolterding
204:
199:
196:
192:
188:
180:
165:
161:
155:
152:
151:
148:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
109:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
312:
307:
288:
284:
281:
277:
274:
268:
251:
248:Church Times
247:
239:
227:
222:
200:
184:
159:
126:project page
111:
107:
68:WikiProjects
35:
256:HectorDavie
135:Anglicanism
118:Anglicanism
110:is part of
87:Anglicanism
326:Categories
215:There are
187:notability
181:notability
130:discussion
58:Stub-class
120:and the
28:deletion
162:on the
64:scale.
295:talk
260:talk
205:. --
185:The
36:keep
34:was
154:Low
328::
313:gr
308:An
297:)
262:)
250:,
228:gr
223:An
193:,
305:—
293:(
258:(
220:—
166:.
132:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
