Talk:Wright Flyer - Knowledge (XXG)

1084:

is widely noted for using nicknames ending in "-cat". These are the Wildcat, Hellcat, Tigercat, Bearcat and Tomcat for the F4F, F6F, F7F, F8F and F-14 respectively. Continuing the "cat" theme, there was also the Grumman Panther, Cougar, Jaguar and Tiger. We can guess that when Grumman won the Lunar Module contract, there were strong arguments within the company to give this spacecraft a "-cat" name to continue this legacy. And when that didn't happen, there were 9 Apollo crews who flew these, with the commanders of Apollo 11, 12, 13, 14, 16 & 17 all having been Navy carrier pilots. In the case of Apollo 12 & 14, BOTH moonwalkers were Navy officers who had flown off of carriers. So any of these missions could have given their spaceships "-cat" callsigns. Neil Armstrong, Pete Conrad, Al Bean, Fred Haise, Alan Shepard, John Young and Gene Cernan all had flown Grumman "cats" off of carriers as their primary aircraft. The others (Lovell, Mitchell, etc) probably flew Grumman "cats" as a Navy test pilot. The best opportunity seems to have been Apollo 12, the All-Navy crew, with all three being Grumman "cat" veterans, with moonwalkers Conrad & Bean having flown the F9F Cougar operationally (VF-43 & VA-44 repectively), and the Command Module Pilot Dick Gordon having flown the F11F Tiger as a test pilot.

875: 820: 1111:. Along with an entire line of "-hawk" aircraft, even predating the Wright merger. This includes the P-1, P-2, P-3, P-5, P-6, P-11, P-17, P-22, P-23, P-36 and AT-4 & AT-5 ...ALL named "Hawk". The P-40 is also known as the Warhawk and the Tomahawk. Various other Curtiss models were named the Seahawk, Sparrowhawk, Goshawk and Blackhawk. Then there was the Dayton-Wright XO-3 Mohawk . (Other companies have produced airplanes named the Skyhawk, Nighthawk, Jayhawk, and most recently the Red Hawk, along with the Hawkeye, and the more obscure Hawk Junior. Helo nicknames include the Black Hawk, Seahawk, Pave Hawk, Jayhawk and SpeedHawk. Pilotless aircraft have been named the Global Hawk, T-Hawk and SpyHawk.) 3334: 2424:. But I stretched my imagination and could not arrive at any possible way that any editor could assess that this FP was an improvement over the Fully Restored version that got knocked out. Perhaps someone here might be able to present a scenario that is consistent with Good Faith. I cannot. It is extremely easy to see that the FP status had been conferred at least as far back as 2012. And that the Fully Restored version was not created until 2018. Had the Fully Restored version existed when the FP decision was being made, it seems quite obvious that FP status would have been given to that one instead. 2634:...and next, went straight to complaining to Admins, instead of presenting a rational rebuttal here as to why your revert was not deliberately inflicting damage. We have seen a history of Admins refusing to uphold WP. Or failure to logically explain why my understanding of WP is incorrect (instead, citing an Essay which contradicted their position). Anyone can look over at that new section where flags have been raised, and see that there are Admins who have mischaracterized the quality of my efforts here. So it appears that we are now entering another cycle of history repeating itself. 1095:(made by North American Aviation, a company which curiously has the same initials as the "First Man", N.A.A.). In parallel with this entrenched history of Grumman "-cats", there is another aircraft company which has an extremely long history of using the "-hawk" nickname. Though I don't hear anyone discuss this one. The Wright Brothers started their own aircraft company. In later years, Wright Aeronautical merged with Curtiss to become Curtiss-Wright, a company which exists to this day, headquartered in North Carolina. You can visit their 477: 732:

worry a little that another editor coming along will see the multiple names up front and decide to add another, and pretty soon the lede becomes a big speed bump right at the start of the article. Several Policies/Guidelines urge not stuffing a lede sentence with multiple names, pronouncers, etc., and as a reader of the encyclopedia myself, I couldn't agree more. On a great many articles, however, those recommendations are honored in the breach. Here is one that was so bad as to be laughable:

2486:

be resolved. The way this was left hanging back in February of 2021, fully one year ago, was not a resolution. Not one consistent with Consensus, as I understand it. And not even with the Admin who intervened and presented an Essay which argued for Consistency Between Articles. I will hold off on that discussion until after this Vandalism issue gets resolved. If we cannot get this aspect under control, then we are walking backwards, no matter what our position on Consensus might be. --

259: 602: 1556: 2995:. I am extremely sorry for having mischaracterized your motivations. There is loads of history in what has been happening here over the past year. So my reaction is laced with some variant of PTSD. Maybe Omicron-PTSD. That does not in any way excuse me having jumped the gun. Well... actually, I did not jump at all. I have been waiting very patiently for well over a month to address your change. Things have certainly gotten out of hand here. 526: 2865:– the Daniels photograph could profitably be the POTD on an anniversary of the flight, for example. The version that holds featured status would be the one to appear; the featured status of the current FP can be transferred via a delist-and-replace nomination to the fully restored version. As you have much better knowledge than I about the merits of this version, I think you to be better suited to initiate or contribute to such a nomination. — 505: 292: 3330:

stopped. The front elevator has been detached and is in a more upright position as it had been twisted over and semi crushed after the fourth flight. Importantly the machine has probably already been brought back several hundred feet from where it ended the 852ft flight by the time this photo was snapped. One can compare the photo with the more clear frontal photo of the machine just after Wilbur's landing.

3323: 3535: 382: 219: 1122:

brothers, as well as the Navy carrier jet aircraft from more than one company, the Tomcat, the Skyhawk, etc. These used what is commonly called a "cat launch", here with the term 'cat' being an abbreviation for 'catapult'. 'Cats' using 'cats'. But this peripheral connection goes far beyond the naming pattern topic. And this entire blockquote section can be set aside for current purposes.

1103:"Curtiss-Wright Corporation ... has a long history with its roots dating back to Orville and Wilbur Wright's first flight in 1903, and Mr. Glenn Curtiss, the father of naval aviation. In 1929, the companies founded by these three great aviation pioneers, the Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company and Wright Aeronautical Corporation, merged to form the largest aircraft company at the time..." 316: 250: 1740:

the event as distinct from the aircraft. We have articles on the inventors, the photographer, and the plane. Each of these discuss the event. But not a separate article for that. And so I see no need whatsoever for us to split out any such distinction. And I don't see how we would go about attempting to do that, even if someone saw that to be a productive effort. --

454: 443: 432: 421: 326: 752:. I've had the same reaction to many other articles which overrun the first sentence with similar, but no doubt not as extreme, examples as that one. After reading that one, and thanks for pointing it out, I may use it on my talk page intro, the first sentence here seems like a walk in the park and doesn't seem like it would hinder the word flow for too many readers. 410: 2428:

accepted this damage. If the actual objection was simply regarding colorization of the historical photo, then the edit which would be consistent with the goal of continual improvement of Knowledge (XXG) articles would be to simply SWAP the colored version with the black&white version, which was readily indicated

670:

possible, including a variety of different names (and pronunciations and linguistic versions) for the topic. I prefer that such additional identifiers be put at the end of the opening paragraph. Policy/Guidelines support that idea--of not stuffing the lead sentence with such material, making it hard to read.

2439:

The approach I myself decided to take upon observing these cases which were clearly damaging the article was to sit back and wait. My hope was that others here would, at the very minimum, raise questions to these editors who were inflicting the damage and give them opportunity to explain themselves.

2356:

I again oppose use of this colorized image in this article, which is jam packed full of original research on the part of the colorizing editor. No one can possibly know what the actual colors were at the time of the flight, and all of the truly encyclopedic content is contained in the black and white

1946:

The only time I looked at Knowledge (XXG) on mobile was when a friend looked something up about 10 years ago, and I've never edited on mobile, so thanks for the explanation and a sad thing to hear. Because of TheGreyMouse's commendable persistence I've added a summary to the lead which should do the

1739:

Here I do not see how the two can be separated. Again, the only reason why the plane is famous is because of the event. And I would assert that our biggest guide on that question is the fact that here on Knowledge (XXG), this Wright Flyer article covers both. There is no separate article covering

3329:

This photo shows the Wrights and party(the men from the Life Saving Station) bringing the Flyer back to the camp after the fourth flight on December 17, 1903. The airplane is in a state of disassembly and transit with the rudder laying on the ground in back of the machine. The engine and props have

3285:

This article uses the global dating system (dd/mm/yy). Why am I ranting about this? Well the flight, took place in Kill Devil, North Carolina, which is in the United States. The United States, however uses their own dating system (mm/dd/yy). I request to fix this. Please change all the dates in the

3099:

Thank you for raising that issue. But it is not academic at all to the discussion which is the focus of this particular subsection. The question that was presented to various editors is why they did not simply switch from the colorized image to the monochrome version. I have yet to see an answer

2485:

this gets fixed goes back to the sticking point from one year ago regarding the issue of whether or not we, as a group, will choose to follow one of the most fundamental principles when it comes to editing: Consensus. After Vandalism, I see that to be the next priority on aspects here that need to

2477:

Of course, the central issue here in this section on Colorization is the question of Policy, which appears to remain unanswered. And the third issue being Consensus. I am starting my reply over here on the Talk by addressing Vandalism, because I see THIS to be the most immediate concern. I would

2266:

In the UK in a small village near Great Ayton there was a steam powered craft that half glided and half flew over a field a few years before the Wright brothers. It is not very well known but the wright brothers were the first to make a sustained flight back in 1903. I'm unaware of any other pre WB

1083:

The aircraft naming story is particularly interesting. Aside from single aircraft being given the name "Kitty Hawk", there is the legacy naming of an entire aircraft type as the "Kittyhawk". Then there is the naming pattern observed within a particular aircraft corporation. Grumman, for example,

669:

The two photos (this page, and the truck with big sign in the wright.edu article) would be considered primary sources. But they seem to provide some support for applying the name "Kitty Hawk" to the plane. As a more general comment, I think the first sentence of any article should avoid, as much as

3136:

You uploaded the colourized image to commons with a Creative Commons 2.5 free licence, when the original file on Flicker was under a "CC BY-NC-ND 2.0" licence, which is a non-free licence. Those are incompatible licences and thus your upload was a copyright violation, as it did not comply with the

3113:

I still do not understand the reason why you say that use here on Knowledge (XXG) of that image should not be allowed. My understanding is that my act of uploading it to the Commons was in line with the creator's permissions. I am not a lawyer. And perhaps someone will present an explanation in

3020:

In my ideal world, the response to my initial post here would have been your explanation, which you gave. And then the other editors piping in to explain their own motivations as being perfectly benign as well. Now me having raised this V-flag probably was the worst way to go about getting their

3252:

Well I can't speak for any other editors, but in my case, I removed it and didn't replace it with anything else, because the article already has a lot of images and didn't need anymore, especially in the section where that image appeared. It was down in the "Specifications" section and overlapped

2505:

vandalism. Accusing editors of vandalism when it's not can be considered a personal attack. I highly advise you to.strike those comments so we.can proceed in good faith discussions on the matter. If you keep falsely accusing editors of vandalism, you will be reported to ANI, and may be blocked to

1121:

One could even go so far as to identify commonality between these two different families of aircraft nicknames, both the -cat and -hawk traditions. The name "Kitty Hawk" has connotations of both -cat and -hawk. And then there is likewise commonality in the launching mechanism used by the Wright

901:

of the Smithsonian who oversaw Operation Homecoming. Garber was one of the foremost historians on the pioneers of flight. He personally accompanied the aircraft during its legs from Nova Scotia to Washington DC. He had approval authority over these aspects of the entire mission, to include the

731:

Well, I just wanted to state my preference as a general principle. I envisioned simply moving all the secondary names to the paragraph end, beginning: "The airplane is also known as...." I almost did, but decided I can live with its present form. Those kinds of ledes are a pet peeve, and I always

3204:

There is one more image of the Wright Flyer which is the only other image I myself am aware of where it was photographed actually flying. The famous infobox image, and this other image. A grand total of two (2). Yet no one knows about this second pic. My own opinion is that it belongs in the

2789:

of the wooden rail which this airplane used to launch off of. In your FP, the length of the takeoff run is utterly ambiguous. For all anyone knows, Orv might have been travelling down it for hundreds of feet prior to liftoff. But in the Fully Restored version, everyone can see, quite clearly,

2824:

I hope I have provided a thorough explanation here as to why one image provides significantly better information to the general public than the other image does. That is to say, I still see your edit as having done a negative improvement to our article. That is my opinion. I am fully open to

716:

Looking again at the initial naming sentence (which I've edited for brevity) its placement seems fine as it contains no pronunciation and is brief enough not to confuse readers or their topic comprehension. It may actually read awkwardly moving those to the end of the first paragraph, and could

2784:

I myself have no care whatsoever regarding FP status. Perhaps you know something that I don't know as to why FP is so important. I myself just use my own two eyeballs. I can readily see that one image tells a better story than the other, making it more historically valuable. Making it more

2427:

So why am I raising this issue about this Wright Flyer article being vandalized here in this section about photo colorization? Because Ariadacapo's edit from Jan 23, exactly 4 weeks ago, is yet another example of deliberate damage being done to the article, where subsequent editors have fully

2716:

I would be interested to know your reason why you have taken no further action, after this has been called to your attention. In my own view, it would at least be appropriate for you to explain why you see your chosen image to be the better choice. You have not done that (let alone revert).

3434:

Liking the uncropped version better, it gives a fuller experience of what the site looked like. I haven't looked if it's there yet, but if it is real, and seems to be, the uncropped version could be used on the page somewhere in a large enough size to provide the feeling of the scene.

2602:

All of 2 minutes after I had raised the issue which I saw to be as Vandalism, you vandalize my post by clobbering the Subsection I had created for the express purpose of highlighting this issue. An issue which I had highlighted one year ago (see Archive). The subsection has now been

819: 2731:

I chose the current image because it appeared, at first glance, to be the better one – one is (currently) a featured picture, and the other is not. Since, as you pointed out, the other version should work better here, I shall not object if you revert my change and replace the image.

2776:, it is now clear that you have no intention to revert it yourself. If your reason for not doing so is because FP status is something which you value as making your image a better one to present to the public, then I expect you're well aware of the other option available here: 1150:, yet another -hawk themed name. Across the street is First Flight Middle School, where they are the Seahawks, and also First Flight Elementary, the Flyers. All three of these schools are adjacent to the Wright Brothers Memorial, with statue of the airplane being even closer. 3595:. The airplane flew 852 feet (260 m) on its fourth and final flight, but was damaged on landing, and minutes later was wrecked when powerful gusts blew it over. The aircraft never flew again but was shipped home and subsequently restored by Orville Wright. It was housed in the 1997:

I have removed it from the lede - a couple of swatches of cloth are too minor to put in the lede and has little to do with the aircraft and its flights during its operational life time. It is mentioned down in the body of the article under "artifacts" and that is sufficient. -

893:

Hap Arnold knew the Wright Brothers personally. One of the "Early Birds", he was taught to fly by them at their school. He was the only 5-star general of the US Air Force, along with being the winner of the first Mackay Trophy, and being a founder of Pan Am and Project RAND.

1828:

remove the short section about pieces of the Wright Flyer being brought to the Moon and Mars? His edit claims "there is an entire section about this at the page below" but it's not clear what "page" he is referring to. I no longer see any references to these in the article.

3076:

This discussion is largely academic anyway, since the image in question is actually CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic) and as such can't be used without a fair-use rationale, and since the black and white version is free it would obviously fail

1118:). But I do see it to be important to have this mentioned here in the Talk page in case anyone were to find a reference where it is stated that there is some connection or tribute. If that were to be found, then it would be important to include that in the Legacy section. 1869:

P.S. I now see that the "page" he was referring to is within the "Artifacts" roll-up subsection of this article. However, still need to understand why the Moon and Mars references are better hidden in an "Artifacts" roll-up section and not in the main body of the article.

889:- PDF p173 of254: Hap Arnold's message at the Smithsonian presentation event, Dec 17, 1948, "...this priceless airplane, the "Kitty Hawk", is back home...", "...I can never think of the "Kitty Hawk" without being aware of...", "...which the "Kitty Hawk" fathered...". 2054:

was used (what if NASA had sent an entire wing of the plane? The tiny fabrics, and the wood which went to the Moon, have the same effect: symbolizing in real-time and space the enormity of what the Wright's accomplished) it would find inclusion in the summary.

2616:

My first post in this section here indicated that I was totally open to alternate reasons which might explain these edits which I've called attention to. You presented a reason which did nothing to explain why you clobbered the image, instead of switching to

874: 2473:

who comes here to learn about the Wright Flyer from seeing this image, regardless of form. And on top of this, there are all of the editors who let the degradation of the infobox image stand. That is two other editors, on top of everyone mentioned above.

2478:

hope that ALL of us, regardless of our differences when it comes to those other two issues, share the common goal of continually improving our article here. Any and all edits which deliberately inflict damage go against that goal, obviously.

1686:

All of this is unambiguous evidence that what is being honored here is not merely the place, and not only the two men, but THE EVENT that was accomplished by these two brothers at this particular place. These are unequivocal tributes to the

1535:

Kitty Hawk, N.C., and for Kill Devil Hill, the site approximately four miles south of the village of Kitty Hawk, where Orville and Wilbur Wright made the first successful sustained powered flights in a heavier-than-air machine on 17 December

3163:

Ok, that's an explanation that makes sense to me. THANK YOU for that. I apparently had made a major error in interpreting what the Flickr license actually meant. Curious that a copyright violation would go undetected for more than one

2846:

I don't disagree with your evaluation of the versions of the photograph, or your judgement on whether to revert the change. Since you don't seem willing to do it either (it doesn't have to be me), I have reinstated the previous infobox

3109:

Now regarding copyright of the colorized image, I see your post to be highly relevant to the main section above. Should you decide to delete it here, and repost up there, I would be perfectly fine with you likewise deleting my reply

2930:

The reason why I held back is because, once you appeared in our discussion here, I saw you to be the best person to do this change. And I am certain that everyone else here would have freaked out by the way I was going to make the

2429: 1982:

Yeah, not the mobile life for me. Edit on a chesttop laptop, much easier laying around than sitting up. My related quibble is the small size of the default print, I crank my machine up to 175 percent and that suits me fine.

1039:

are not shabby references, as with the highly prestigious newspapers previously cited above, and of course the US Navy and US Air Force themselves, along with the Smithsonian, the folks who own, keep and maintain the

1073:, it is important for this article to likewise include the legacy of things which followed that were also named "Kitty Hawk". This includes aircraft and spacecraft, ships (airplane/aircraft carriers), and schools. 153: 3779: 566: 3394:

Because many people think the aeroplane is still flying. There was a caption by early flying historian Carroll Gray, it has now been reduced to a citation, and now essentially out of site. So I added some

576: 3301:

Good catch. The article originally used MDY dates, but because of a mistaken change to the article date in May 2021, the date style was changed in December 2021. As such, I've started changing it back.

2342:

Despite the consensus, this image seem to be constantly reintroduced. I agree it does not belong, looks really awful. It looks more like a screenshot from a video game than a historical photograph. -

2022:

this lead could use a couple more paragraphs in addition to this one. Maybe concentrate on extending the lead summary, which is now too short, and provide the standard lead-overview of the article.

3784: 2036:

It doesn't matter really, even if the lede is expanded, or split into more paras, the fact that a tiny swatch of fabric was sent to Mars is still really minor and wouldn't belong in the lede. -

1091:, nor similar. These "Moon Sailors" never did that. And I've never heard this topic raised, nor any of the moonwalkers asked this directly. But Apollo 14 did name their Command Module the 3744: 1232:, who flew this as prep for entering the "V-5 Naval Aviation program". The screening was done at Amherst's Civilian Pilot Training Course as the first phase of officer candidate training ( 3774: 2707:, thank you for explaining what had happened with your infobox image edit. Given that, then I have mischaracterized what has happened in that case. It appears that I owe you an apology. 2956:

Thank you also for all the info regarding FP. I've long been aware of all that. And then with the pic we're discussing, when striving to evaluate your reasons, I had also seen this:

1501:

reason why the place became famous is because of that singular event which happened on one particular day in history. The day that this aircraft became the first successful airplane.

1134:. This school is located on Kitty Hawk Rd. And this road is one mile from the Main Entrance at Randolph, Air Force Base, the famous pilot training base that was given the nickname 3505:. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the 2433: 1964:, I do 99% of my editing on Android smartphones, and I use the desktop site. I only check out the mobile site from time to time, to verify that it still sucks, which it still does. 3184:

it actually does absolutely nothing to answer the question as to why no one, yourself included, opted for the solution of swapping the colorized image to the black&white image.

2469:. If the four of you are objecting to Colorization, then why did none of you not simply swap the colorized photo for the historical black&white version? You all are denying 1126:

For the time being, the recommendation being proposed is to add a Legacy section where direct connections are clear. This includes the specific aircraft and spacecraft named the

1228:

The Viking B-8 Kitty Hawk, used as a trainer during World War II (along with the Waco and Cub). One of the most famous pilots who trained in this Kitty Hawk was none other than

1928:, this is the type of havoc that WMF software foolishness wreaks. The fully functional desktop site works fine on 2021 mobile devices and the app is addressing 2010 problems. 2610: 2573: 1114:

Now I am not aware of these Hawk-themed aircraft nicknames as being connected with the Wright Brothers, or was done in tribute to them (with the obvious exception being the

3734: 1832:

Certainly, the section as written was entirely accurate and now no information about the Wright Flyer pieces brought to the Moon and Mars appears in this article at all.

1252:

was picked at the same place and time as Ted Williams by the Naval Aviation Cadet Selection Board. So it appears that it would be a reasonable guess that George Bush

147: 878:

Transcript of Hap Arnold's speech from the day that the airplane was presented at the Smithsonian, with three examples highlighted of him referring to it by the name

395: 381: 2159:

The U.S. Smithsonian Institution describes the aircraft as "the first powered, heavier-than-air machine to achieve controlled, sustained flight with a pilot aboard."

3719: 2659:

I have no objection to using the highest-quality image here. Admittedly I did not scrutinise the files before making the change, not being an expert in this area.

2404:. And subsequent editors appear to be perfectly accepting of incremental deliberate damage that has been done. On Jan 12, well over one month ago, Ravenpuff did 717:

inhibit reading flow from the first to the second paragraph. What wording are you envisioning, maybe I'm missing it and you have a good sentence in mind. Thanks.

1236:). This B-8 Kitty Hawk was built by Viking Flying Boat Co. of New Haven, CT, after a merger with Bourdon Aircraft Corporation of Hillsgrove, Rhode Island (info 542: 263: 3749: 79: 2853:

status is accorded to the highest-quality images on Knowledge (XXG), and can serve as a useful indicator to editors who want to use (say) a photograph of the

1172: 3729: 1257: 1221: 2667:

featured pictures can be delisted and replaced; you can nominate the version you uploaded to replace the current featured picture if superior to it – see

2249:'s craft flew about 90 feet vs Wright's 120 feet. So I gathered the key distinction was control. Stringfellow's craft was unmanned and thus uncontrolled. 1164: 2282: 3333: 823:

Operation Homecoming, with crate marked "KITTYHAWK" (no space), and truck marked twice on each side identifying the aircraft's name as the "KITTY HAWK"

905:

This Smithsonian reference includes examples from many various newspapers which referred to this airplane exclusively as the "Kitty Hawk", including

533: 510: 1758: 870:- PDF p109 of254: "...the Wright Brothers' "Flyer" is...", (along with calling it the "Kitty Hawk", newspaper: The Knickerbocker News, Albany, NY). 2544:

And your reply, and your threat, did not address the first vandalism issue which I had raised. The deliberate degradation of the infobox image. --

85: 3739: 3222:

No one switched to the b&w. Everyone deleted it. Repeatedly, and persistently. Voicing objection only to the fact that it was colorized. --

3655: 1607:

And with the US Navy, to maintain that the ship is named for the village, then it DOES NOT explain why their ship's symbol unambiguously depicts

3769: 3764: 1767:

I have not delved into this, but I would be shocked if anyone there attempts to split out any distinction between the aircraft vs the event. --

1920:

mentions the "roll- up subsection", I can only conclude that this editor is reading the article on the godforsaken mobile app which displays

1637:

These prominent facts make it absolutely clear that regardless of what their official story might be, these are all examples of things being

924:. And this was my first thought when I first happened across this article, many years ago: "I wonder why they aren't calling this plane the 2018:. The lead summarizes its page and, apparently, is the only thing shown on some screens. Instead of removing these important honors of the 1241: 856:- PDF p43 of254: US NAVY OFFICIAL MEMO & PLAN, airplane referred to as "Kitty Hawk" x2 in Memo, x1 in Plan, signed by XO of USS Palau. 44: 30: 3510: 943:

Thanks Wright Stuf for your detailed research and analysis. Nice work. I enjoyed the link to decades of the scale model planes, all named

1634:

If it was really only named for the village of Kitty Hawk, then a proper symbol would be the Town Hall, or at least their local 7-Eleven.

2986:

I myself could care less which version is used on that day. But maybe some time before December of 2023, I might find a reason to care.

2147: 1679: 860:

Here are the rare exceptions to where the aircraft is referred to by any name other than the "Kitty Hawk" (or "Kitty", or "Kittyhawk"):

230: 3759: 3754: 789:

Any child who grew up as an avid builder of plastic model airplane kits knows very well that this most famous airplane is called the

99: 3608: 2779:- Since it is important to you, then you can do what you had initially suggested that I do. Nominate for that Delist/Replace thing. 1571:

But I see this to be as silly as if those kids in San Antonio were told that their school, Kitty Hawk Middle School, is named after

907:

The New York Times, The New York Sun, The Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Washington Daily News, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

794: 356: 1539: 486: 338: 302: 297: 104: 20: 1079:

These following blockquote paragraphs can be skipped as largely being an aside, separate from the Legacy section being recommended

2558:

It's a dispute over of content, in this case a photo. It is not vandalism. Anyway, you can defend yourself to the admins at ANI.

1130:, along with the ships, and even one school in Texas, where the students at Kitty Hawk Middle School in San Antonio are known as 867:- PDF p87 of254: "...Orville sought to have the 'Flyer' (as they called me)...", Magazine article, Current Science and Aviation. 864:- PDF p71 of254: airplane "...known as both the "Flyer" and the "Kitty Hawk"." (newspaper: Paterson Evening News, Paterson, NJ). 850:- PDF p29,p47-57,p81 of254: airplane referred to as "Kittyhawk" (with no space), along with the commonly used name "Kitty Hawk". 74: 3724: 3498: 655:

The "Here is an article..." link above has a photo with the "Kitty Hawk" name displayed, would that be copyable for the page?

272: 2278: 1924:

the lead section of the article, unless the reader clicks on a pull-down menu to actually read the body of the full article.

1676:, here is a patch design which does not depict a silhouette of the two brothers, but instead shows their airplane in flight: 1366:

And here's another excellent reference which shows that the name "Warhawk" was not used until the F-model (Kittyhawk Mk II):

916:

Upon examination of the plethora of sources contained within this Smithsonian scrapbook, it indicates quite clearly that the

541:

and related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3662: 3494: 3137:

image's licence. You can note the image has been deleted from Commons, which renders quite a bit of this discussion moot. -

2409: 65: 1458:

One other issue to be resolved. Are things named Kitty Hawk named after the aircraft itself or the first flight (location)?

1294:

Imagine if someone were to discover a photo of a pilot like Ted Williams or George Bush flying one of these Kitty Hawks. --

808: 168: 3681: 3600: 3355:

I'm a bit confused, what's the mystery of the photo? Furthermore, will solving this mystery help improve the article? -

1572: 135: 1194: 3591:", it was relatively unstable and very difficult to fly. The Wright brothers flew it four times in a location south of 2323:. I believe the colorized and edited photo has no place in this article. I also remember this was the consensus in the 1522:

Now the US Navy, for example, will tell you their official story that the aircraft carrier was named in tribute to the

3568: 2412:, this was somehow an improvement. Yet anyone doing a cursory comparison can readily see that this FP is actually an 2324: 1875: 1840: 1386:

This section of Knowledge (XXG) explains that the batch of P-40s delivered to the AVG Flying Tigers were "Tomahawks":

1016:- America Welcomes the Kittyhawk. Some Extracts from the American Press on the Return of the Aeronautical Beau Geste. 190: 1289:, with the logo of pilot's wings featuring a cat's face as the center crest, and the words KITTY HAWK on the wings.) 628:. Seems enough to include it as an alternate name, but is there information that it should be the official name with 3534: 1175:, etc. At least citing the most prominent ones. It seems to be a fitting complement to the Reproductions section. 847:

p41,p45,p73,p221 of254: airplane referred to as "Kitty", for short, along with the commonly used name "Kitty Hawk".

633: 3592: 2432:. And who is the person who had uploaded that black&white version? None other than Ariadacapo. (B&w pic 981:

Wilbur & Orville Wright: A Bibliography Commemorating the One-Hundredth Anniversary of the First Powered Flight

343:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of 185: 2050:

I'd disagree. If there was an adequate lead summarizing the page the honoring, no matter how large a piece of the

1406:

Tomahawk IIB's, to be exact. So P-40C's. That was well before the USAAF started calling the P-40F's the Warhawk.

1349: 109: 199: 3676: 3644: 3639: 3634: 3502: 2274: 1885:

I don't know what you mean by 'roll up section'. The topics have a decent sized section with some good images.

1143: 608:

This image, used on the page, includes a note from Orville Wright which indicates that he is calling the plane

344: 1286: 278: 129: 2143: 1917: 1899: 1871: 1836: 1463: 1435: 1323: 1256:

flew the B-8 Kitty Hawks at Amherst. (Bush & Williams ended up as "Cloudbusters" in the V-5 program at

1178:

And there's also the "Kitty Hawk Air Society" of the US Air Force Junior ROTC. Here's one page of theirs:

797:

These ubiquitous kits, available all across the USA, spanned from the 1950s through the 1990s at a minimum.

538: 2270: 2135: 988:

On pg123 (pdf132of153) you can find a batch of even more examples where the airplane is referred to as the

911:

Paterson, NJ, Dayton, OH, Omaha, NE, Scranton, PA, Albany, NY, Buffalo, NY, Nova Scotia, and Wellington, NZ

3701: 3596: 3580: 3576: 3490: 3291: 2298: 2574:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Wright Stuf and false accusations of vandalism

2401: 125: 55: 3227: 3119: 3055: 2830: 2722: 2642: 2549: 2491: 2396:

Vandalism - or perhaps an alternative explanation as to recent edits which have degraded article quality

2229: 2139: 2114: 1902:, thanks for the suggestion, I've added a brief note in the lead as a summary of the Artifacts section. 1772: 1745: 1700: 1555: 1414: 1299: 1202: 1049: 933: 621: 235: 3287: 844: 839:

throughout this document (with three rare exceptions cited below). Here are particular pages of note:

812: 70: 684:

Sounds like a good format. The Smithsonian reference seems like the key one we presently have for the

3440: 3021:

feedback. But I am glad that with you, this has resolved in the way that I had originally hoped for.

2959:"This image was selected as picture of the day on the English Knowledge (XXG) for December 17, 2023." 2332: 2060: 2027: 1988: 1952: 1907: 1890: 1859: 1807: 1680:

https://www.popularpatch.com/navy-patches/aircraft-carrier-patches/cvl-49-uss-wright-kitty-hawk-patch

964: 757: 722: 693: 660: 645: 616:

the name that the Wright's used for this plane and, if so, did they also name it, then or later, the

476: 249: 175: 3409:

I can see how people might think that, but I don't know that it is a problem on Knowledge (XXG). -

2882: 2749: 2688: 2453:

And this involves far more than just those two editors. This same question is being asked of you,

2362: 1970: 1934: 1672: 786:, for highlighting this issue. And for these initial steps you've taken to correct the situation. 601: 161: 3587:. It used a 12-horsepower (9-kilowatt) gasoline engine powering two pusher propellers. Employing " 3253:

into the "See also" section. It just added to too much clutter, regardless of the other issues. -

2070: 1430:

British designations early in the war for American aircraft were taken from placenames in the US.

1427:+bomber, "Whirlibomber" from Westland Whirlwind+bomber and Bombphoon from Bomb(er)+Hawker Typhoon. 3472: 3400: 3345: 2462: 1850:

As I said in my edit summary, a section already existed when you added yours. You can find it at

1802:

helicopter, so wanted to let you know before other Space Shuttle pages are unitalicized. Thanks.

1719: 1459: 1431: 1319: 204: 3078: 2130: 1540:

https://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/danfs/k/kitty-hawk-cva-63-ii.html

350: 2807:

I see the ball to be in your court here. And of course, you have the option to leave it there.

3518: 2313:

The article once again features a colorized image, in the Specifications section, as added by

2294: 2246: 1762: 1249: 51: 2862: 1346:"...designating it the D-model, while the Royal Air Force gave it a new name: the Kittyhawk." 1233: 980: 827:

This 'Wright 1903 Flyer "Operation Homecoming" Scrapbook' from the Smithsonian Institute has

3501:(POTD) for December 17, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at 3467:

I added it for context and added the other front photo. Cropped versions are at Wikicommons.

3458: 3307: 3223: 3115: 3086: 3051: 2841: 2826: 2718: 2662: 2638: 2581: 2563: 2545: 2511: 2487: 2314: 2254: 2240: 2225: 2211: 2188: 2110: 1768: 1741: 1696: 1424: 1410: 1295: 1198: 1069:

Given the understanding that this famous aircraft has been widely and commonly known as the

1045: 929: 800:

And here is the motherload reference for the Wright Brothers' 1903 airplane being named the

201: 2668: 2421: 2171:

They made the first controlled, sustained flight of a powered, heavier-than-air aircraft...

1265: 1245: 3620: 3604: 3564: 3436: 3385: 3258: 3142: 2825:

considering any and all other productive views on this which may run counter to my own. --

2443: 2416:

of the image. So it is obvious that FP was simply pretense for this deliberate vandalism.

2347: 2328: 2164: 2078: 2056: 2041: 2023: 2003: 1984: 1961: 1948: 1925: 1903: 1886: 1855: 1825: 1803: 1409:

Then there's also the fighterbomber units who nicknamed their P-40's the "Kittybomber". --

960: 783: 753: 739: 718: 707: 689: 675: 656: 641: 331: 141: 3201:

To this very moment, my own view is that it is an excellent image to have in our article.

3050:, I am sorry for the unnecessary and inaccurate mischaracterization of your work here. -- 2850: 1237: 2785:

valuable for this article. For example, in the Fully Restored version, you can see the

1168: 809:

https://sova.si.edu/record/NASM.XXXX.0393?s=11210&n=10&t=C&q=Art&i=11212

525: 504: 3416: 3362: 3047: 2868: 2773: 2735: 2704: 2674: 2466: 2447: 2358: 1965: 1929: 898: 2527:"I believe the colorized and edited photo has no place in this article." - Ariadacapo 2224:

I think the key word that you quote is "sustained" that doesnt apply to Stringfellow.

3713: 3468: 3396: 3341: 1389: 3322: 1179: 1099:, and that page shows you the Wright Flyer. Click on that image, and it says this: 3588: 3546: 3514: 3450: 1851: 1229: 1031:

It's quite colorful to call this plane the "Aeronautical Beau Geste". That aside,

24: 1272:

going thru the V-5 program in Iowa.) The marketing slogan that Bourdon used was:

315: 291: 3624: 3454: 3303: 3082: 2577: 2559: 2507: 2481:

No one else here has fixed the infobox image. I intend to do that myself. And

2454: 2250: 2184: 1261: 1139: 2109:

Interesting but in the end it is trivia and doesnt need a mention in the lead.

1798:, etc.). Saw you also removed italics from the name of a Space Shuttle and the 1350:

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Curtiss_P_40/2pCHCwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1

218: 3381: 3254: 3138: 3100:

presented which explains this as not being willful degradation of our article.

2606:

In light of Ravenpuff's explanation (below), I have modified the header title.

2458: 2343: 2074: 2037: 2015: 1999: 1787: 1369: 1269: 1096: 977:

These were great documents to read. And here is another excellent reference:

735: 703: 671: 321: 3506: 3410: 3356: 2858: 1596:

It creates cognitive dissonance as to why these kids refer to themselves as

955:

has probably become the common name). At a minimum your research shows that

225: 2925:"No one else here has fixed the infobox image. I intend to do that myself." 3286:

article to fit mm/dd/yy. This is to give convenience to American readers.

3560: 3556: 3497:

used in this article, has been selected as the English Knowledge (XXG)'s

885:

This speech transcript is what I consider to be the STRONGEST reference:

203: 2532:

That is not a content objection. It is a photo colorization objection.

2327:, which I hope we do not need to reproduce here. I will remove it now. 2073:, but let's see if any other editors think it should be in the lede. - 1087:

But that didn't happen. I've never seen anyone refer to the LM as the

1817:

Why was section discussing pieces of Flyer on Moon and Mars deleted???

3584: 1494:

I myself do not see that as being anything that needs to be resolved.

1153:

Another excellent subsection for this would include mention of these

3522: 3476: 3462: 3444: 3425: 3404: 3389: 3371: 3349: 3311: 3295: 3262: 3231: 3146: 3123: 3090: 3059: 2889: 2857:

in an article. Featured pictures are also eligible to appear on the

2834: 2756: 2726: 2695: 2646: 2585: 2567: 2553: 2515: 2495: 2366: 2351: 2336: 2302: 2286: 2258: 2233: 2192: 2118: 2082: 2064: 2045: 2031: 2007: 1992: 1977: 1956: 1941: 1911: 1894: 1879: 1863: 1844: 1811: 1776: 1749: 1704: 1467: 1439: 1418: 1343:"...the export version of the P-40, tagged the Tomahawk by Curtiss." 1327: 1303: 1206: 1053: 968: 937: 761: 743: 726: 711: 697: 679: 664: 649: 2535:

NO ONE, not even you, raised any objection other than colorization.

3332: 3321: 1554: 873: 818: 600: 2293:

Knowledge (XXG) content is based on published reliable sources.

1190: 702:

Agree, the airandspace.si.edu article is good secondary source.

1854:. Please have a look to see if more needs to be added, thanks. 1755:

Here is what I see to be another excellent guide for us here...

1423:"Kittybomber" is Kittyhawk+bomber (see also "Hurribomber" from 640:, but Orville's note doesn't include the word 'Flyer'. Thanks. 243: 213: 205: 15: 2919:

You stated: "Since you don't seem willing to do it either..."

2131:

https://www.newscientist.com/definition/first-powered-flight/

1318:

The P-40 Kittyhawk and Tomahawk names are British creations.

2790:

exactly how long the maximum length of that takeoff run was.

475: 380: 2420:

Now my own starting point when evaluating that edit was to

224:

A fact from this article was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s

2408:

to the infobox, presenting the justification that being a

1002:- The Kitty Hawk Comes Home at Last, by Findley, Earl N., 3599:

in London from 1928 to 1948, and is now exhibited at the

3780:

High-importance Smithsonian Institution-related articles

3081:

point 1. I've tagged it for deletion on Commons anyway.

2866: 2733: 2672: 793:. That's because this was clearly the name on the box: 537:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 3696: 3691: 3686: 2405: 2319: 951:

as primary name, and it would be an interesting RM (as

749: 733: 688:

name (and Orville's note seems the icing on the cake).

3509:. If you have any concerns, please place a message at 3337:

front view of Wright 1903 machine after fourth flight.

160: 3785:

WikiProject Smithsonian Institution-related articles

3745:

Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Technology

983:(NASA Publication SP-2002-4527, published Sep, 2002) 853:- PDF p41,p67 of254: "Kitty Hawk Day" proclamation. 393:

This article has been checked against the following

2671:. At any rate, this does not count as vandalism. — 2611:

User:Wright Stuf and false accusations of vandalism

392: 174: 3563:– on December 17, 1903. Invented and flown by the 2922:Actually, you will find this in my original post: 1790:. Single aircraft which are named are italicized ( 1197:), the 40-plus year predecessor to NASA itself. -- 622:Here is an article which includes, near the bottom 2450:, I am giving you that opportunity here and now. 3775:C-Class Smithsonian Institution-related articles 795:Google Image Search: kitty+hawk+wright+model+kit 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 638:as an alternate name (click 'long description') 3603:in Washington, D.C. This photograph, taken by 3555:, made the first sustained flight by a manned 1718:OOPS. I now see that I misread your comment, 1107:So it is this company which produced the P-40 748:sol (smiling out loud and almost lol) at that 3181:As for things becoming moot by that deletion, 3114:which the light bulb will click on for me. -- 1340:Here's an in-depth reference which explains: 8: 3735:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Technology 902:name by which the airplane was referred to. 554:Template:WikiProject Smithsonian Institution 551:Knowledge (XXG):GLAM/Smithsonian Institution 1370:http://ram-home.com/ram-old/p-40family.html 1222:File:Viking_B-8_Kitty_Hawk_(2835380968).jpg 2381:The following discussion has been closed. 2373: 2268: 835:. Furthermore, that is the name which is 612:. It is clickable for a larger image. Was 499: 389: 286: 2637:Or perhaps, someone might surprise me. -- 2357:photo. This simply does not belong here. 624:, evidence that the plane was called the 3489:Hello! This is to let editors know that 3451:Wright Flyer#Flight trials at Kitty Hawk 1759:The Spirit of St. Louis (disambiguation) 947:. You've shown that there is a case for 557:Smithsonian Institution-related articles 337:This article is within the scope of the 3615:seconds into its first flight in 1903. 3511:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Picture of the day 3205:article along with that Dec 14th image. 2203: 1279:Flies Like a Hawk — Lands Like a Kitten 1013:, Dec. 1948, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 18-19 959:should remain as the main alternative. 632:being the common name? The Smithsonian 501: 288: 247: 3730:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles 3720:Selected anniversaries (December 2010) 3575:is a single-place biplane design with 2183:, which, back then, would be a pilot. 2170: 2158: 2125:The Wright brothers were not the first 999:, Nov. 29, 1948, vol. 49, no. 22, p.15 355:. To use this banner, please see the 3559:powered and controlled aircraft – an 1185:Far more important, and arguably the 1167:at Embry-Riddle in Daytona, Florida, 1062:Legacy section, in light of the name 1006:, Dec. 1948, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 5-6 7: 3750:C-Class vital articles in Technology 3529: 2609:My full reply is posted over there ( 1763:Charles Lindbergh#In popular culture 531:This article is within the scope of 365:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Aviation 3485:Featured picture scheduled for POTD 2989:Now I had stated that I owe you an 2506:prevent this from occurring again. 620:or was that a name used by others? 534:Smithsonian Institution WikiProject 277:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1189:important of all of these, is the 831:of this airplane being called the 14: 3609:United States Life-Saving Service 3567:, it marked the beginning of the 2400:This article has been repeatedly 2069:I would basically classify it as 1218:Here's another one I had missed: 1020:, June 1949, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 21 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 3533: 1244:, stating that 34 were built). 920:for this famous airplane is the 524: 503: 452: 441: 430: 419: 408: 324: 314: 290: 257: 248: 217: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3579:(drooping) wings, front double 3380:I agree, what is your point? - 1761:. We have an entire section on 1643:in honor of the Wright Brothers 1138:. Another school, back at the 829:well over one hundred instances 571:This article has been rated as 3740:C-Class level-5 vital articles 2325:talk page discussion last year 2259:13:13, 28 September 2021 (UTC) 2234:11:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC) 2193:04:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC) 2119:17:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC) 1146:, with their mascot being the 1: 3770:WikiProject Aviation articles 3765:WikiProject Aircraft articles 3601:National Air and Space Museum 3477:19:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC) 3463:02:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC) 3445:01:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC) 3426:00:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC) 3405:19:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC) 3390:00:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC) 3372:22:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC) 3350:22:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC) 3318:Solving mystery of this photo 3312:03:02, 22 December 2022 (UTC) 3296:02:08, 22 December 2022 (UTC) 3263:16:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 3232:16:39, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 3147:15:56, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 3124:15:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 3091:14:56, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 3060:13:30, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2890:12:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2835:12:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2757:10:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2727:08:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2696:00:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2647:08:45, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2586:02:08, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2568:01:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2554:00:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2516:00:26, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2496:00:19, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 2367:07:24, 20 February 2022 (UTC) 2352:01:36, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 1835:Strongly need this restored. 1264:, as stated by Anne Keene in 1009:- Kitty Hawk's Last Landing. 762:03:27, 31 December 2021 (UTC) 744:02:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC) 727:12:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 712:02:24, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 698:02:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 680:02:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 665:20:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 650:00:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC) 597:, alternate or original name? 545:and see a list of open tasks. 484:This article is supported by 368:Template:WikiProject Aviation 42:Put new text under old text. 3523:23:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC) 2337:19:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC) 2303:04:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC) 2287:04:40, 7 December 2022 (UTC) 1777:16:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 1750:16:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 1705:16:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 1468:07:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 1440:06:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 1419:04:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 1328:21:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC) 1304:21:05, 22 January 2022 (UTC) 1207:23:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC) 1054:16:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC) 969:11:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC) 938:02:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC) 897:And then of course there is 2083:13:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 2065:13:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 2046:12:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 2032:12:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 2008:12:18, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 1993:03:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 1978:03:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 1957:03:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 1942:03:27, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 1912:03:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 1895:03:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 1880:03:06, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 1864:03:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 1845:03:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 909:, along with newspapers in 3801: 3593:Kitty Hawk, North Carolina 3453:. It's been there awhile. 1390:Flying_Tigers#Curtiss_P-40 1182:showing the Wright Flyer. 413:Referencing and citation: 3760:C-Class aircraft articles 3755:C-Class aviation articles 3281:Uses global dating system 570: 519: 483: 309: 285: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 3607:, a local member of the 3503:Template:POTD/2023-12-17 2384:Please do not modify it. 2129:Stringfellow beat them. 1670:Even in the case of the 1144:First Flight High School 995:- Kitty Hawk in Museum. 750:article before your edit 3569:pioneer era of aviation 2309:Colorized image (again) 1812:21:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC) 1136:"West Point of the Air" 548:Smithsonian Institution 539:Smithsonian Institution 511:Smithsonian Institution 424:Coverage and accuracy: 3725:C-Class vital articles 3663:More featured pictures 3491:File:First flight2.jpg 3338: 3326: 1852:Wright Flyer#Artifacts 1724:You were questioning: 1559: 1124: 882: 824: 605: 480: 457:Supporting materials: 385: 75:avoid personal attacks 3336: 3325: 2501:A content dispute is 1558: 1075: 877: 822: 604: 479: 384: 271:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 264:level-5 vital article 100:Neutral point of view 3551:, also known as the 2275:Andrew James Gilbert 1248:document shows that 487:the aircraft project 340:Aviation WikiProject 105:No original research 3630:Recently featured: 3619:Photograph credit: 2430:over on the Commons 1737:Not Plane vs Place. 446:Grammar and style: 399:for B-class status: 3499:picture of the day 3339: 3327: 2863:picture of the day 2155:From this article: 1560: 1425:(Hawker) Hurricane 1173:at Maxwell AFB, AL 1169:in Chanute, Kansas 1037:Air Force Magazine 883: 825: 606: 481: 386: 273:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 3672: 3671: 3635:Common cuttlefish 3627: 3278: 3277: 2289: 2273:comment added by 2163:From the article 2138:comment added by 1918:TheGreyMouser2016 1900:TheGreyMouser2016 1872:TheGreyMouser2016 1837:TheGreyMouser2016 1275:The Kitty Hawk: 1004:U.S. Air Services 591: 590: 587: 586: 583: 582: 498: 497: 494: 493: 470: 469: 415:criterion not met 371:aviation articles 357:full instructions 242: 241: 236:December 17, 2010 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3792: 3618: 3583:and rear double 3557:heavier-than-air 3537: 3530: 3513:. Thank you! — 3495:featured picture 3424: 3419: 3413: 3370: 3365: 3359: 2877: 2874: 2871: 2845: 2744: 2741: 2738: 2683: 2680: 2677: 2666: 2414:inferior version 2410:Featured Picture 2386: 2374: 2322: 2244: 2216: 2215: 2208: 2151: 1975: 1973:Let's discuss it 1939: 1937:Let's discuss it 1757:This example of 1600:, and not, say, 837:used exclusively 636:Kitty Hawk Flyer 577:importance scale 559: 558: 555: 552: 549: 528: 521: 520: 515: 507: 500: 460: 456: 455: 449: 445: 444: 438: 434: 433: 427: 423: 422: 416: 412: 411: 390: 373: 372: 369: 366: 363: 334: 329: 328: 327: 318: 311: 310: 305: 294: 287: 270: 261: 260: 253: 252: 244: 221: 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3800: 3799: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3668: 3650: 3649: 3621:John T. Daniels 3605:John T. Daniels 3565:Wright brothers 3487: 3422: 3421: 3417: 3411: 3368: 3367: 3363: 3357: 3320: 3283: 2872: 2869: 2839: 2739: 2736: 2678: 2675: 2660: 2398: 2382: 2318: 2311: 2238: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2210: 2209: 2205: 2165:Wright brothers 2133: 2127: 1971: 1935: 1824:Why did editor 1819: 1784: 1497:...because the 1067: 599: 573:High-importance 556: 553: 550: 547: 546: 514:High‑importance 513: 458: 453: 447: 442: 436: 431: 425: 420: 414: 409: 370: 367: 364: 361: 360: 332:Aviation portal 330: 325: 323: 300: 268: 258: 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3798: 3796: 3788: 3787: 3782: 3777: 3772: 3767: 3762: 3757: 3752: 3747: 3742: 3737: 3732: 3727: 3722: 3712: 3711: 3705: 3704: 3699: 3694: 3689: 3684: 3679: 3673: 3670: 3669: 3667: 3666: 3659: 3651: 3648: 3647: 3642: 3637: 3631: 3629: 3623:; restored by 3597:Science Museum 3539: 3538: 3528: 3527: 3486: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3465: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3415: 3392: 3375: 3374: 3361: 3319: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3282: 3279: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3202: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3182: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3111: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3094: 3093: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2987: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2920: 2917: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2848: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2699: 2698: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2635: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2614: 2607: 2604: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2570: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2519: 2518: 2417: 2397: 2394: 2392: 2388: 2387: 2378: 2377: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2310: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2218: 2217: 2202: 2201: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2175:Key words are 2173: 2168: 2161: 2156: 2126: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 1867: 1866: 1818: 1815: 1783: 1780: 1766: 1756: 1754: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1723: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1647:their airplane 1635: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1605: 1602:"The Asphalts" 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1537: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1495: 1492: 1490:Place vs Plane 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1428: 1407: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1347: 1344: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1283: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1180:with pin photo 1165:this other one 1105: 1104: 1082: 1066: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1014: 1007: 1000: 986: 985: 984: 972: 971: 891: 890: 872: 871: 868: 865: 858: 857: 854: 851: 848: 817: 816: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 598: 592: 589: 588: 585: 584: 581: 580: 569: 563: 562: 560: 543:the discussion 529: 517: 516: 508: 496: 495: 492: 491: 482: 472: 471: 468: 467: 465: 463: 462: 461: 450: 439: 428: 417: 403: 402: 400: 387: 377: 376: 374: 336: 335: 319: 307: 306: 295: 283: 282: 276: 254: 240: 239: 222: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3797: 3786: 3783: 3781: 3778: 3776: 3773: 3771: 3768: 3766: 3763: 3761: 3758: 3756: 3753: 3751: 3748: 3746: 3743: 3741: 3738: 3736: 3733: 3731: 3728: 3726: 3723: 3721: 3718: 3717: 3715: 3703: 3700: 3698: 3695: 3693: 3690: 3688: 3685: 3683: 3680: 3678: 3675: 3674: 3665: 3664: 3660: 3658: 3657: 3653: 3652: 3646: 3643: 3641: 3638: 3636: 3633: 3632: 3628: 3626: 3622: 3616: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3541: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3531: 3526: 3524: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3484: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3433: 3427: 3420: 3414: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3393: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3373: 3366: 3360: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3335: 3331: 3324: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3280: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3203: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3183: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3112: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3075: 3074: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 2994: 2993: 2988: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2958: 2957: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2929: 2924: 2923: 2921: 2918: 2916: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2891: 2888: 2885: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2875: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2849: 2843: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2788: 2783: 2778: 2777: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2758: 2755: 2752: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2742: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2706: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2697: 2694: 2691: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2681: 2670: 2664: 2658: 2657: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2615: 2612: 2608: 2605: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2534: 2531: 2526: 2525: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2504: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2484: 2479: 2475: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2463:GraemeLeggett 2460: 2456: 2451: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2435: 2431: 2425: 2423: 2418: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2395: 2393: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2380: 2379: 2376: 2375: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2321: 2316: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2242: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2222: 2214:. 2016-04-28. 2213: 2212:"Exhibitions" 2207: 2204: 2200: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2172: 2169: 2166: 2162: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2140:203.170.14.66 2137: 2132: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2053: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1969: 1968: 1963: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1940: 1938: 1933: 1932: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1833: 1830: 1827: 1822: 1816: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1781: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1764: 1760: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1733: 1732: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1721: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1685: 1681: 1678: 1677: 1675: 1674: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1612: 1611: 1606: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1574: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1557: 1541: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1529: 1527: 1526: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1500: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1460:GraemeLeggett 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1432:GraemeLeggett 1429: 1426: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1391: 1388: 1387: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1351: 1348: 1345: 1342: 1341: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1320:GraemeLeggett 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1288: 1284: 1282: 1280: 1274: 1273: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1181: 1176: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1157: 1151: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1123: 1119: 1117: 1112: 1110: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1074: 1072: 1065: 1061: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1038: 1034: 1033:Aviation Week 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1019: 1015: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1001: 998: 997:Aviation Week 994: 993: 991: 987: 982: 979: 978: 976: 975: 974: 973: 970: 966: 962: 958: 954: 950: 946: 942: 941: 940: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 919: 914: 912: 908: 903: 900: 895: 888: 887: 886: 881: 876: 869: 866: 863: 862: 861: 855: 852: 849: 846: 842: 841: 840: 838: 834: 830: 821: 814: 810: 807: 806: 805: 803: 798: 796: 792: 787: 785: 781: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 746: 745: 741: 737: 734: 730: 729: 728: 724: 720: 715: 714: 713: 709: 705: 701: 700: 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 682: 681: 677: 673: 668: 667: 666: 662: 658: 654: 653: 652: 651: 647: 643: 639: 637: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 611: 603: 596: 593: 578: 574: 568: 565: 564: 561: 544: 540: 536: 535: 530: 527: 523: 522: 518: 512: 509: 506: 502: 489: 488: 478: 474: 473: 466: 464: 459:criterion met 451: 448:criterion met 440: 437:criterion met 429: 426:criterion met 418: 407: 406: 405: 404: 401: 398: 397: 391: 388: 383: 379: 378: 375: 358: 354: 353: 348: 347: 342: 341: 333: 322: 320: 317: 313: 312: 308: 304: 299: 296: 293: 289: 284: 280: 274: 266: 265: 255: 251: 246: 245: 237: 233: 232: 227: 223: 220: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3661: 3654: 3617: 3613:Wright Flyer 3612: 3611:, shows the 3589:wing warping 3573:Wright Flyer 3572: 3552: 3547:Wright Flyer 3545: 3544: 3542: 3488: 3340: 3328: 3288:MLBFanAdrien 3284: 3046:Once again, 2991: 2990: 2914: 2886: 2881: 2878: 2867: 2855:Wright Flyer 2854: 2786: 2753: 2748: 2745: 2734: 2692: 2687: 2684: 2673: 2572:Reported at 2502: 2482: 2480: 2476: 2470: 2452: 2442: 2438: 2426: 2419: 2413: 2399: 2391: 2383: 2312: 2295:AndyTheGrump 2269:— Preceding 2265: 2247:Stringfellow 2206: 2198: 2180: 2176: 2134:— Preceding 2128: 2052:Wright Flyer 2051: 2020:Wright Flyer 2019: 1972: 1966: 1936: 1930: 1921: 1868: 1834: 1831: 1823: 1820: 1799: 1795: 1792:Wright Flyer 1791: 1785: 1753: 1736: 1730: 1728: 1717: 1692: 1689:Wright Flyer 1688: 1671: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1610:the airplane 1609: 1608: 1601: 1598:"The Flyers" 1597: 1532: 1524: 1523: 1498: 1489: 1278: 1276: 1253: 1230:Ted Williams 1186: 1184: 1177: 1160: 1155: 1154: 1152: 1147: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1125: 1120: 1115: 1113: 1108: 1106: 1092: 1088: 1086: 1078: 1076: 1071:"Kitty Hawk" 1070: 1068: 1063: 1041: 1036: 1032: 1017: 1010: 1003: 996: 990:"Kitty Hawk" 989: 956: 953:Wright Flyer 952: 948: 944: 926:"Kitty Hawk" 925: 922:"Kitty Hawk" 921: 918:PRIMARY NAME 917: 915: 910: 906: 904: 896: 892: 884: 880:"Kitty Hawk" 879: 859: 836: 833:"Kitty Hawk" 832: 828: 826: 802:"Kitty Hawk" 801: 799: 791:"Kitty Hawk" 790: 788: 779: 778: 685: 635: 630:Wright Flyer 629: 625: 618:Wright Flyer 617: 613: 609: 607: 594: 572: 532: 485: 394: 351: 345: 339: 279:WikiProjects 262: 229: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 25:Wright Flyer 19:This is the 3224:Wright Stuf 3116:Wright Stuf 3052:Wright Stuf 2842:Wright Stuf 2827:Wright Stuf 2719:Wright Stuf 2663:Wright Stuf 2639:Wright Stuf 2546:Wright Stuf 2488:Wright Stuf 2315:Wright Stuf 2241:MilborneOne 2226:MilborneOne 2179:, and also 2111:MilborneOne 1769:Wright Stuf 1742:Wright Stuf 1697:Wright Stuf 1693:Kitty Hawk. 1411:Wright Stuf 1296:Wright Stuf 1262:Gerald Ford 1260:along with 1258:Chapel Hill 1250:George Bush 1199:Wright Stuf 1140:Outer Banks 1046:Wright Stuf 930:Wright Stuf 899:Paul Garber 435:Structure: 352:task forces 234:section on 231:On this day 148:free images 31:not a forum 3714:Categories 3625:Lise Broer 3553:Kitty Hawk 3437:Randy Kryn 2915:THANK YOU! 2444:Ariadacapo 2402:vandalized 2329:Ariadacapo 2199:References 2181:controlled 2057:Randy Kryn 2024:Randy Kryn 1985:Randy Kryn 1962:Randy Kryn 1949:Randy Kryn 1926:Randy Kryn 1904:Randy Kryn 1887:Randy Kryn 1856:Randy Kryn 1826:Randy Kryn 1804:Randy Kryn 1673:USS Wright 1533:Named for: 1270:John Glenn 1161:Kitty Hawk 1148:Nighthawks 1132:The Flyers 1128:Kitty Hawk 1093:Kitty Hawk 1064:Kitty Hawk 1042:Kitty Hawk 961:Randy Kryn 957:Kitty Hawk 949:Kitty Hawk 945:Kitty Hawk 754:Randy Kryn 719:Randy Kryn 690:Randy Kryn 686:Kitty Hawk 657:Randy Kryn 642:Randy Kryn 626:Kitty Hawk 614:Kitty Hawk 610:Kitty Hawk 595:Kitty Hawk 346:open tasks 3702:file page 3645:Raspberry 3640:Tim Peake 3507:Main Page 3048:Ravenpuff 2859:Main Page 2705:Ravenpuff 2603:restored. 2467:Cullen328 2448:Ravenpuff 2406:THIS EDIT 2359:Cullen328 2320:this edit 2267:flight! 2071:WP:TRIVIA 1800:Ingenuity 1796:Enola Gay 1729:Plane vs 1116:Kittyhawk 1109:Kittyhawk 1011:Air Force 811:(dnld as 780:THANK YOU 634:includes 267:is rated 226:Main Page 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3581:elevator 3577:anhedral 3561:airplane 3469:Koplimek 3397:Koplimek 3395:clearup. 3342:Koplimek 3079:WP:NFCCP 2617:b&w. 2283:contribs 2271:unsigned 2148:contribs 2136:unsigned 1639:de facto 1573:THE ROAD 1097:homepage 396:criteria 362:Aviation 303:Aircraft 298:Aviation 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3692:history 3656:Archive 3525:(UTC) 3515:Amakuru 2992:apology 2931:change. 2861:as the 2524:Hello? 1947:trick. 1782:Italics 1268:, with 1266:her vid 1163:, like 1159:of the 1156:statues 1089:Lunacat 575:on the 269:C-class 228:in the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3585:rudder 3571:. The 3455:BilCat 3304:BilCat 3083:FDW777 2847:image. 2669:WP:FPC 2578:BilCat 2560:BilCat 2508:BilCat 2471:anyone 2455:BilCat 2446:& 2251:DB1729 2245:Well, 2185:DB1729 2014:Hello 1967:Cullen 1931:Cullen 1786:Hello 1720:Graeme 1691:, the 1641:named 1240:& 275:scale. 126:Google 3697:watch 3382:Ahunt 3255:Ahunt 3164:year. 3139:Ahunt 3110:here. 2870:RAVEN 2787:start 2737:RAVEN 2676:RAVEN 2459:Ahunt 2344:Ahunt 2177:pilot 2075:Ahunt 2038:Ahunt 2016:Ahunt 2000:Ahunt 1916:When 1821:All, 1788:Ahunt 1731:Event 1536:1903. 1525:place 1285:(see 1142:, is 1018:Pylon 784:Randy 736:DonFB 704:DonFB 672:DonFB 256:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3687:edit 3682:talk 3677:view 3543:The 3519:talk 3493:, a 3473:talk 3459:talk 3449:See 3441:talk 3412:ZLEA 3401:talk 3386:talk 3358:ZLEA 3346:talk 3308:talk 3292:talk 3259:talk 3228:talk 3143:talk 3120:talk 3087:talk 3056:talk 2883:talk 2873:PVFF 2831:talk 2750:talk 2740:PVFF 2723:talk 2689:talk 2679:PVFF 2643:talk 2582:talk 2564:talk 2550:talk 2512:talk 2492:talk 2465:and 2434:here 2363:talk 2348:talk 2333:talk 2299:talk 2279:talk 2255:talk 2230:talk 2189:talk 2144:talk 2115:talk 2079:talk 2061:talk 2042:talk 2028:talk 2004:talk 1989:talk 1953:talk 1922:only 1908:talk 1891:talk 1876:talk 1860:talk 1841:talk 1808:talk 1773:talk 1746:talk 1701:talk 1645:and 1528:... 1499:only 1488:Re: 1464:talk 1436:talk 1415:talk 1324:talk 1300:talk 1254:ALSO 1246:THIS 1242:HERE 1238:HERE 1203:talk 1195:seal 1191:NACA 1187:most 1050:talk 1044:. -- 1035:and 965:talk 934:talk 928:. -- 758:talk 740:talk 723:talk 708:talk 694:talk 676:talk 661:talk 646:talk 567:High 349:and 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2503:not 2483:how 2436:.) 2422:AGF 2317:in 1234:ref 845:PDF 813:PDF 176:TWL 3716:: 3521:) 3475:) 3461:) 3443:) 3403:) 3388:) 3348:) 3310:) 3294:) 3261:) 3230:) 3145:) 3122:) 3089:) 3058:) 2851:FP 2833:) 2774:Ok 2732:— 2725:) 2717:-- 2645:) 2613:). 2584:) 2576:. 2566:) 2552:) 2514:) 2494:) 2461:, 2457:, 2365:) 2350:) 2335:) 2301:) 2285:) 2281:• 2257:) 2232:) 2191:) 2150:) 2146:• 2117:) 2081:) 2063:) 2044:) 2030:) 2006:) 1991:) 1955:) 1910:) 1893:) 1878:) 1862:) 1843:) 1810:) 1794:, 1775:) 1748:) 1703:) 1695:-- 1466:) 1438:) 1417:) 1326:) 1302:) 1287:AD 1205:) 1171:, 1081:.) 1052:) 992:: 967:) 936:) 913:. 843:- 804:: 782:, 760:) 742:) 725:) 710:) 696:) 678:) 663:) 648:) 301:: 156:) 54:; 3517:( 3471:( 3457:( 3439:( 3423:\ 3418:T 3399:( 3384:( 3369:\ 3364:T 3344:( 3306:( 3290:( 3257:( 3226:( 3141:( 3118:( 3085:( 3054:( 2887:· 2879:· 2844:: 2840:@ 2829:( 2754:· 2746:· 2721:( 2693:· 2685:· 2665:: 2661:@ 2641:( 2580:( 2562:( 2548:( 2510:( 2490:( 2361:( 2346:( 2331:( 2297:( 2277:( 2253:( 2243:: 2239:@ 2228:( 2187:( 2167:: 2142:( 2113:( 2077:( 2059:( 2040:( 2026:( 2002:( 1987:( 1951:( 1906:( 1889:( 1874:( 1858:( 1839:( 1806:( 1771:( 1765:. 1744:( 1722:. 1699:( 1649:. 1613:: 1604:. 1575:! 1531:" 1462:( 1434:( 1413:( 1322:( 1298:( 1281:" 1277:" 1201:( 1193:( 1077:( 1048:( 963:( 932:( 815:) 756:( 738:( 721:( 706:( 692:( 674:( 659:( 644:( 579:. 490:. 359:. 281:: 238:. 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index