768:
392:
413:
583:
344:
800:
511:
493:
673:
214:
607:
297:
361:
745:
734:
723:
617:
879:
subjective and lacking substance, basically just a person's opinion. It also contains errors, such as "If 13,500 people did all actually see something that they took for a UFO at the time, I guarantee you that more than just a single photograph would have resulted". You can see for example, at least one video not mentioned in the podcast exists, with provenience.
244:
836:
712:
701:
1199:
Most of the errors I found and tried to correct are still present. It would seem that this page is guarded too heavily by people with a shared POV who will prefer the errors to persist as long as they promote their own POV, to make it worthwhile for me to attempt to get these errors to be corrected.
885:
Can we delete this sentence? Or alternatively, if it must stay, can we clarify what was actually disputed. For example specifically proposes a hypothesis that some of the events could have been caused by helicopters, and asserts that the 13,500 eyewitness accounts are the result of a psychosocial
878:
At the end of the section on the
Belgian wave, it just says, "This entire Belgian UFO wave, however, has been disputed by skeptics.". Isn't this way too vague of an assertion. Ideally, what has been disputed should be explicit. Also, is just a transcript of a podcast, and the dispute seems highly
1040:
The article doesn't address the word purportedly in this specific context, but uses criminal trial as an example. In the case of an anecdote from an anonymous person, purported is better than stating what the person said as a being a fact as was previously the case before added. If you don't like
985:
You have shown no evidence that the website you linked is the source of the image, and not one of the many, many sites that host a copy of it because the photographer placed it in the public domain, allowing it to be used freely and widely. The image you removed was a valuable illustration of the
1007:
The reason purported was added, is that the claim was not determined. You did not give a valid reason to undo the revert, and if you were being honest, you'd recognize that the edits I made dramatically improved the quality of the page, as in its previous form it contained multiple misleading or
904:
It should be noted that the photo associated with the photo in the
Belgium wave section is also fishy, because none of the citations match that particular photo. The podcast cited shows a different photo, although also attributed to Patrick Maréchal. And news article, shows yet another photo
1042:
said, or something like that. Or remove the statement in question all together. The goal should be for the article to be accurate. You're just undoing the work I put in to correct obvious errors in the article. Take the time to verify what you are doing makes sense before doing it. Thanks.
1151:
The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page
1128:
Perhaps you have not seen the warnings on your IP talk page: You must stop revert warring. You have seen that others disagree with your changes - continuing as you have been will get your IP blocked and/or the page locked so that IP editors may not longer change it.
1057:
Reverting your changes is in fact a 'good faith edit', because your edits made the article worse. You are not correcting 'obvious errors', you are pushing your personal POV in a way that obviously conflicts with
Knowledge (XXG)'s content policies.
1241:
Would it be worth adding a section for this? Given that it was filmed? It's kinda heartbreaking that there are only two photos here, one of them's a hoax and the other is suggested to be a formation of orbs rather than a black triangle.
1200:
The information elucidating the errors is here on the talk page, so if anyone with enough authority to get these errors fixed, who cares about the integrity of
Knowledge (XXG), wants to take on the burden themselves, feel free to do so.
981:
word (that really is a guideline), we do not insert such words to try to undercut the reliable sources. That is POV pushing - even if you personally disagree with the source, Knowledge (XXG) policy is that we follow what it
164:
937:
You need to justify why you added back the photo from abaduct-anon.com, that doesn't even match the photos discussed by
Dunning, or the other sources that are cited, neither in their purported origin or the image
909:, attributes the image to J.S. Henradi. The source of this image is also a highly fringe website. The image should either be replaced to be consistent with the sources that are cited, or removed all together.
1149:
please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors.
1156:
1115:
1044:
1009:
961:
942:
910:
887:
923:
I reverted the latest changes - they were generally pushing POV (repeatedly inserting the word 'purportedly') and overall replaced properly sourced content with more credulous text. -
1078:
You can simply look at the source of the image, and compare it with the images in the cited sources, and see clearly they are not the same image, nor have the same provenience.
1201:
259:
158:
205:
862:
21:06, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC) Can someone categorically state when the first FT was reported? Is there an archive which catalogued the first proper Flying
Triangle sighting?
686:
672:
1336:
1160:
1119:
1048:
1013:
965:
946:
905:
different than the one in the section and different than the one in but also attributes it to the same person. Yet the source of the actual image in this section,
559:
1232:
Hey, not sure how to work this into the article, but the maintainers might be interested to know that a video of a black triangle was shot some time in the 2010s
565:
475:
90:
1099:
1321:
465:
55:
336:
1311:
840:
531:
1341:
1326:
441:
96:
1205:
1361:
1356:
941:
Using the word purportedly is preferable to just asserting the thing is true, when that's not the case. Please under the revert. Thank you.
1331:
1316:
41:
278:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
201:
535:
527:
518:
498:
420:
397:
1351:
1346:
914:
891:
110:
647:
974:
First, I did find it necessary, that is why I did it. Second, that is an essay, not a policy or guideline. It's somebody's opinion.
777:
629:
593:
588:
115:
31:
179:
1233:
85:
1084:
906:
146:
1238:
The uploader's reddit account had existed for a year before the upload, and wasn't previously involved in the UFOs subreddit.
372:
1112:
76:
1100:
https://www.lefigaro.fr/sciences/2011/07/28/01008-20110728ARTFIG00353-la-photo-d-un-ovni-belge-celebre-etait-un-trucage.php
440:
related articles on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
255:
1104:
Source shows yet a different image (not the one
Dunning discussed or abduct-anon.com) but with the same provenience
140:
634:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
213:
196:
825:
120:
224:
635:
136:
986:
topic of the article, and contained important cited content in the image caption. That should not be removed.
378:
186:
66:
312:
1081:
Here is the image. It comes from a credulous abduction website, that credits the image to J.S. Henradi.
81:
1000:"Words such as supposed, apparent, alleged, and purported can imply that a given point is inaccurate,
799:
1273:
275:
35:
1261:
767:
360:
271:
1143:"Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that
815:
530:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with
172:
1286:
1246:
978:
819:
229:
641:
296:
152:
822:) may not even acknowledge its existence. The most reliable sources may be highly speculative.
1290:
1250:
1188:
1134:
1063:
1031:
991:
958:
928:
62:
1234:
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/14wygn7/this_was_taken_from_a_friend_of_my_dads_while/
1174:
1085:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081205155054/http://www.abduct-anon.com/AUTHENTIC%20PHOTOS.htm
907:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081205155054/http://www.abduct-anon.com/AUTHENTIC%20PHOTOS.htm
412:
391:
226:
829:
1269:
1113:
https://www.science-et-vie.com/article-magazine/photos-dovnis-la-plus-celebre-etait-fausse
622:
324:
1265:
1002:
although alleged and accused are appropriate when wrongdoing is asserted but undetermined
867:
1305:
1183:
IP, you do understand that you have been reverted by multiple other people, correct?
814:
Because of the nature of such projects, the most authoritative sources (any involved
808:
433:
429:
17:
1184:
1130:
1059:
1027:
987:
924:
1147:, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute,
606:
582:
1041:
that, maybe make a good faith edit, replacing the word purported with, <X: -->
824:
Please ensure that the article is well and reliably sourced and does not contain
1170:
228:
1294:
1277:
1254:
1209:
1192:
1178:
1164:
1138:
1123:
1067:
1052:
1035:
1017:
995:
969:
950:
932:
918:
895:
880:
859:
612:
523:
510:
492:
437:
307:
425:
329:
1145:
you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be
1090:
1285:
To make this clear though: I'm not making this my problem. See ya.
316:
column on 3 September 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
858:
This article should probably state what "ULM" and "RPV" means. —
522:, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the
1169:
I have, and I will draw the inevitable and logical conclusion.
1096:
Source shows no image, but speaks about the same story from .
794:
354:
291:
238:
230:
26:
959:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Revert_only_when_necessary
766:
671:
342:
1024:
such as with people awaiting or undergoing a criminal trial
1282:
Why would a RP be needed here? What would they be adding?
283:
279:
250:
171:
1093:, shows a different image with different provenience.
1022:
You've omitted crucial context from your quotation:
684:
This article has been checked against the following
424:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
683:
185:
955:You are not supposed to revert without good cause.
564:This article has not yet received a rating on the
538:, where you can join the project and discussions.
977:Using the word 'purportedly' is an example of a
44:for general discussion of the article's subject.
337:Knowledge (XXG):Recent additions/2004/September
8:
881:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBUULtF0TGw
874:Should we allow vague assertions like this?
680:
577:
487:
386:
322:... that the mysterious objects known as
628:This article is within the scope of the
579:
489:
388:
358:
343:
1337:Unknown-importance paranormal articles
1023:
646:. To use this banner, please see the
544:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Paranormal
516:This article falls under the scope of
450:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Skepticism
1312:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles
1157:2605:59C8:33D2:D310:28CE:DC6B:B0:D666
1116:2605:59C8:33D2:D310:28CE:DC6B:B0:D666
1045:2605:59C8:33D2:D310:28CE:DC6B:B0:D666
1010:2605:59C8:33D2:D310:28CE:DC6B:B0:D666
962:2605:59C8:33D2:D310:28CE:DC6B:B0:D666
943:2605:59C8:33D2:D310:28CE:DC6B:B0:D666
911:2605:59C8:33D2:D310:78A5:5930:AE:59D0
888:2605:59C8:33D2:D310:78A5:5930:AE:59D0
335:A record of the entry may be seen at
7:
901:I'm going to go ahead and delete it.
656:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Aviation
418:This article is within the scope of
1322:High-importance Skepticism articles
807:This article deals with a military
377:It is of interest to the following
34:for discussing improvements to the
1091:https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4538
25:
1264:source. Knowledge (XXG) requires
61:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
798:
743:
732:
721:
710:
699:
615:
605:
581:
509:
491:
411:
390:
359:
295:
242:
212:
56:Click here to start a new topic.
1342:WikiProject Paranormal articles
1327:WikiProject Skepticism articles
547:Template:WikiProject Paranormal
470:This article has been rated as
453:Template:WikiProject Skepticism
306:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1:
1362:WikiProject Aviation articles
1357:WikiProject Aircraft articles
1202:2605:59C8:33D2:D310:0:0:0:45C
1193:21:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
1179:21:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
1165:21:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
1139:21:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
1124:21:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
1068:21:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
1053:21:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
1036:21:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
1026:. That is not the case here.
1018:21:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
996:20:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
970:20:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
951:20:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
933:12:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
919:08:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
896:05:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
775:This article is supported by
659:Template:WikiProject Aviation
444:and see a list of open tasks.
53:Put new text under old text.
1008:untrue bits of information.
1332:C-Class paranormal articles
1317:C-Class Skepticism articles
837:black project working group
1378:
1295:17:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
1278:00:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
1255:22:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
870:19:38, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
835:For more details, see the
704:Referencing and citation:
566:project's importance scale
476:project's importance scale
1352:C-Class aircraft articles
1347:C-Class aviation articles
1210:23:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
774:
600:
563:
504:
469:
406:
385:
282:; for its talk page, see
91:Be welcoming to newcomers
841:military history project
715:Coverage and accuracy:
771:
748:Supporting materials:
676:
519:WikiProject Paranormal
421:WikiProject Skepticism
367:This article is rated
348:
86:avoid personal attacks
770:
675:
371:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
346:
206:Auto-archiving period
111:Neutral point of view
18:Talk:TR-3 Black Manta
1155:Have you read this?
778:the aircraft project
631:Aviation WikiProject
304:Black triangle (UFO)
276:Black triangle (UFO)
270:. Its contents were
266:with a consensus to
116:No original research
36:Black triangle (UFO)
1228:Ontario 2010s video
820:defense contractors
737:Grammar and style:
690:for B-class status:
550:paranormal articles
456:Skepticism articles
772:
677:
373:content assessment
349:
254:was nominated for
97:dispute resolution
58:
849:
848:
844:
830:vague predictions
793:
792:
789:
788:
785:
784:
761:
760:
717:criterion not met
706:criterion not met
662:aviation articles
648:full instructions
576:
575:
572:
571:
486:
485:
482:
481:
353:
352:
290:
289:
237:
236:
77:Assume good faith
54:
16:(Redirected from
1369:
834:
802:
795:
751:
747:
746:
740:
736:
735:
729:
725:
724:
718:
714:
713:
707:
703:
702:
681:
664:
663:
660:
657:
654:
625:
620:
619:
618:
609:
602:
601:
596:
585:
578:
552:
551:
548:
545:
542:
513:
506:
505:
495:
488:
458:
457:
454:
451:
448:
415:
408:
407:
402:
394:
387:
370:
364:
363:
355:
345:
328:may actually be
299:
292:
251:TR-3 Black Manta
246:
245:
239:
231:
217:
216:
207:
190:
189:
175:
106:Article policies
27:
21:
1377:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1302:
1301:
1230:
876:
856:
845:
828:information or
749:
744:
738:
733:
727:
722:
716:
711:
705:
700:
661:
658:
655:
652:
651:
623:Aviation portal
621:
616:
614:
591:
549:
546:
543:
540:
539:
534:, or visit the
472:High-importance
455:
452:
449:
446:
445:
401:High‑importance
400:
368:
347:Knowledge (XXG)
330:hybrid airships
325:Black triangles
243:
233:
232:
227:
204:
132:
127:
126:
125:
102:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1375:
1373:
1365:
1364:
1359:
1354:
1349:
1344:
1339:
1334:
1329:
1324:
1319:
1314:
1304:
1303:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1283:
1229:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1181:
1153:
1110:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1097:
1094:
1087:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1005:
983:
975:
956:
953:
939:
902:
875:
872:
864:
855:
854:Misc. comments
852:
847:
846:
833:
805:
803:
791:
790:
787:
786:
783:
782:
773:
763:
762:
759:
758:
756:
754:
753:
752:
741:
730:
719:
708:
694:
693:
691:
678:
668:
667:
665:
627:
626:
610:
598:
597:
586:
574:
573:
570:
569:
562:
556:
555:
553:
528:related topics
514:
502:
501:
496:
484:
483:
480:
479:
468:
462:
461:
459:
442:the discussion
416:
404:
403:
395:
383:
382:
376:
365:
351:
350:
340:
334:
333:
300:
288:
287:
264:12 August 2017
262:was closed on
260:The discussion
247:
235:
234:
225:
223:
222:
219:
218:
192:
191:
129:
128:
124:
123:
118:
113:
104:
103:
101:
100:
93:
88:
79:
73:
71:
70:
59:
50:
49:
46:
45:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1374:
1363:
1360:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1350:
1348:
1345:
1343:
1340:
1338:
1335:
1333:
1330:
1328:
1325:
1323:
1320:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1310:
1309:
1307:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1243:
1239:
1236:
1235:
1227:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1098:
1095:
1092:
1089:Source one,
1088:
1086:
1083:
1080:
1077:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1003:
999:
998:
997:
993:
989:
984:
980:
976:
973:
972:
971:
967:
963:
960:
957:
954:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
935:
934:
930:
926:
922:
921:
920:
916:
912:
908:
903:
900:
899:
898:
897:
893:
889:
883:
882:
873:
871:
869:
863:
861:
853:
851:
842:
838:
831:
827:
823:
821:
817:
812:
810:
809:black project
804:
801:
797:
796:
780:
779:
769:
765:
764:
757:
755:
750:criterion met
742:
739:criterion met
731:
728:criterion met
720:
709:
698:
697:
696:
695:
692:
689:
688:
682:
679:
674:
670:
669:
666:
649:
645:
644:
639:
638:
633:
632:
624:
613:
611:
608:
604:
603:
599:
595:
590:
587:
584:
580:
567:
561:
558:
557:
554:
537:
533:
532:current tasks
529:
525:
521:
520:
515:
512:
508:
507:
503:
500:
497:
494:
490:
477:
473:
467:
464:
463:
460:
443:
439:
435:
434:pseudohistory
431:
430:pseudoscience
427:
423:
422:
417:
414:
410:
409:
405:
399:
396:
393:
389:
384:
380:
374:
366:
362:
357:
356:
341:
338:
331:
327:
326:
321:
318:
317:
315:
314:
309:
305:
301:
298:
294:
293:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
248:
241:
240:
221:
220:
215:
211:
203:
200:
198:
194:
193:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
131:
130:
122:
121:Verifiability
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
98:
94:
92:
89:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
68:
64:
63:Learn to edit
60:
57:
52:
51:
48:
47:
43:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1270:- LuckyLouie
1260:Reddit is a
1244:
1240:
1237:
1231:
1152:protection."
1148:
1144:
1001:
886:phenomenon?
884:
877:
866:pictures? -
865:
857:
850:
826:unverifiable
813:
806:
776:
685:
642:
636:
630:
536:project page
517:
471:
419:
379:WikiProjects
323:
320:Did you know
319:
313:Did you know
311:
303:
302:A fact from
267:
263:
249:
209:
195:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
105:
30:This is the
816:governments
726:Structure:
643:task forces
280:its history
159:free images
42:not a forum
1306:Categories
1262:WP:USERGEN
637:open tasks
541:Paranormal
524:paranormal
499:Paranormal
447:Skepticism
438:skepticism
398:Skepticism
1107:as and .
979:WP:WEASEL
868:Omegatron
308:Main Page
99:if needed
82:Be polite
32:talk page
687:criteria
653:Aviation
594:Aircraft
589:Aviation
256:deletion
197:Archives
67:get help
40:This is
38:article.
1287:Myas012
1247:Myas012
1185:MrOllie
1131:MrOllie
1060:MrOllie
1028:MrOllie
988:MrOllie
938:itself.
925:MrOllie
839:of the
474:on the
426:science
369:C-class
310:in the
210:60 days
165:WP refs
153:scholar
1171:Drmies
375:scale.
272:merged
137:Google
1266:WP:RS
982:says.
860:Timwi
274:into
268:merge
180:JSTOR
141:books
95:Seek
1291:talk
1274:talk
1251:talk
1206:talk
1189:talk
1175:talk
1161:talk
1135:talk
1120:talk
1064:talk
1049:talk
1032:talk
1014:talk
992:talk
966:talk
947:talk
929:talk
915:talk
892:talk
818:and
640:and
526:and
466:High
436:and
284:here
173:FENS
147:news
84:and
560:???
258:.
187:TWL
1308::
1293:)
1276:)
1268:.
1253:)
1245:--
1208:)
1191:)
1177:)
1163:)
1137:)
1122:)
1066:)
1051:)
1034:)
1016:)
994:)
968:)
949:)
931:)
917:)
894:)
592::
432:,
428:,
208::
167:)
65:;
1289:(
1272:(
1249:(
1204:(
1187:(
1173:(
1159:(
1133:(
1118:(
1062:(
1047:(
1030:(
1012:(
1004:"
990:(
964:(
945:(
927:(
913:(
890:(
843:.
832:.
811:.
781:.
650:.
568:.
478:.
381::
339:.
332:?
286:.
202:1
199::
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
69:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
